reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I've banned another political opposition party that questioned my legitimacy, using the Department of Justice to seize their assets. This follows my 2022 ban on major opposition parties and TV channels linked to them, as well as taking control of Ukraine's largest television networks. My presidential term ended on May 20th, but I canceled elections, citing martial law and suspending the constitution to remain in power. Some may say this is acceptable because we are at war. But, consider the implications if we accept this rationale. Leaders in other countries may use the same excuse to suspend constitutions and cancel elections, especially considering the conflicts with Russia and China. They are already conditioning people to accept a dictatorship by using the Department of Justice to target political opponents.

- The conversation opens with a discussion of escalating dynamics in the Ukraine conflict as a new year begins, focusing on how the rules of war have shifted over the past four years, including the depth of NATO involvement and when actions cross into direct war. The speakers note that political leadership has largely been exempt from the war, but Russia has had opportunities to strike Ukrainian leaders that have been avoided, raising questions about future targets and the diplomatic path. - Speaker 1 argues that the political leadership has indeed been outside the war, and that voices inside Russia are growing more critical. They challenge the Western portrayal of Vladimir Putin as a dictator, suggesting Putin has restrained destruction that could hit the West, and asserting that the West and Zelenskyy have grown comfortable with exemptions. They warn that continued escalation could lead to a nuclear conflict with Europe at risk due to its geographic compactness, citing the potential fallout from attacks on American nuclear bases and the broader geopolitical consequences. - The discussion moves to the potential consequences of Western strikes on energy infrastructure and frontline energy targets, including refineries and civilian vessels. The speakers examine how Russia might respond if its assets are attacked at sea or in the Black Sea, and the possibility of Russia forcing Ukraine to lose access to the Black Sea through strategic military actions. The analysis includes a few provocative specifics: British and European actors allegedly orchestrating or enabling attacks, the role of third-country-flagged ships, and the idea that reflagging to Russian flags could be treated as an act of war by Russia. - The dialogue delves into the operational dynamics of the Mediterranean and Black Sea theatres, noting incidents such as sunflowers and other oil cargo damage, the Caspian transit company's facilities, and the implications for Turkish oil revenue and Western economies. The speakers argue that Western powers are drawing in broader international actors and that the war could expand beyond Ukraine, potentially dragging in NATO ships and submarines in a conflict at sea. They warn that if escalation continues, it could trigger a broader, more destructive war in Europe. - The conversation shifts to the likely trajectory of the battlefield, with Speaker 1 offering a grim assessment: the Donbas front and the Zaporozhye region are nearing collapse for Ukrainian forces, with Russian forces dominating missile and drone capabilities and outmaneuvering on three axes. The analysis suggests that within two to three months, upper-river-front areas, including the Zaporozhzhia and surrounding Donbas fronts, could be fully compromised, leaving only a few large urban pockets. The absence of civilian protection and the encirclement of cities would accelerate Ukrainian withdrawals and surrender, while Russia could enhance pressure on remaining fronts, including Donbas and Sumy, Kharkiv, and Dnieper regions, as weather and terrain favor Russian movements. - The speakers discuss the impact of collapsing command posts and morale, likening the abandonment of Gudai Poia to a sign of impending broader collapse, with open terrain making Ukrainian forces vulnerable to rapid Russian breakthroughs. They suggest that strategic fortifications will be overwhelmed as the front line collapses and supply lines are severed, with a predicted sequence of encirclements and city sieges. - The US role is analyzed as both a negotiator and strategist, with the assertion that the United States has long led the proxy dimension of the conflict and continues to influence targeting and weapons delivery. The discussion questions the coherence of US policy under Trump versus Biden, arguing the conflict remains a US-led enterprise despite attempts to reframe or outsources it. The speakers describe the US as hedging its bets through ongoing military support, budgets, and intelligence cooperation, while insisting that Ukraine remains a core objective of US hegemony. - A critical examination of European Union leadership follows, with strong claims that the EU is increasingly tyrannical and undemocratic, sanctioning dissidents andSuppressing speech. The dialogue condemns the deplatforming of individuals and argues that the EU’s leadership has undermined diplomacy and negotiated peace, instead pushing toward a broader confrontation with Russia. The speakers suggest that several European countries and elites are pursuing escalating policies to maintain power, even at the risk of deepening European instability and economic collapse. - The conversation ends with reflections on broader historical patterns, invoking Kennan’s warnings about NATO expansion and the risk of Russian backlash, and noting the potential for the EU to fracture under pressure. The participants acknowledge the risk of a wider conflict that could redefine global power and economic structures, while expressing concern about censorship, deplatforming, and the erosion of diplomacy as barriers to resolving the crisis. They conclude with a cautious note to prepare for worst-case scenarios and hope for, but not rely on, better circumstances in the near term.

As European economies decline, young people can't afford homes, and energy costs are much higher, leading to a declining standard of living and low birth rates, which is a sign of civilizational collapse. There's a lot of rage in Europe, and the Russia-Ukraine war serves as a relief valve for European leaders to blame Putin. The UK's response to fighting a new war against Russia is sad because Russia could easily defeat the UK. Turning the population's rage towards Russia distracts from domestic issues. Intelligence sources believe Ukrainians were behind the Nord Stream pipeline attack.

President Zelensky of Ukraine has gained control of the media, banned political opposition parties, and cancelled the upcoming presidential elections. This move is seen as an attempt to silence critics of corruption in Ukraine and the ongoing war. Comparisons are drawn to past instances, such as South Vietnam holding elections during the Vietnam War and Iraq conducting democratic elections during a period of violence. The speaker questions President Biden's support for Ukraine, suggesting that it undermines democracy while taking money from American taxpayers. The concern is raised that if our government supports canceling elections in Ukraine, they may justify doing the same in the United States during times of war.

The situation in Ukraine is dire: Zelensky is unpopular, people are being press-ganged into service, and corruption is rampant. The Western press is dishonest, ignoring the destruction of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and the persecution of its members. I'm an American attorney defending the Ukrainian Orthodox Church against Zelensky's attempts to destroy it. Despite being arrested in Moscow for defending Putin's political opponents, I'm now labeled a Russian stooge for defending the Church. The US government is involved in establishing a new church in Ukraine, violating religious freedom in the name of anti-Putin activities. The Ukrainians have developed a sophisticated propaganda campaign and are exercising control over the media. Zelensky has destroyed civil society and is jailing and torturing priests, and the international community is silent.

Patrick Baab and the host discuss the perceived erosion of freedom of expression in Europe and the role of governments and institutions in pressuring speech. - Baab asserts that there is “no freedom of speech in the EU anymore,” citing a 160-page US Congress report published in February that allegedly finds the EU Commission created a system of complete censorship across the European Union. The report states the EU regime “pressured platforms in the Internet to suppress lawful speech, including speech that was true simply because it was politically inconvenient,” and that the Commission is transforming itself “into a censorship authority against democracy.” - The discussion moves to Jacques Baud (spelled Baud by Baab, sometimes Jacques Baud), a Swiss colonel and analyst who argued that the war in Ukraine had been provoked. Baab notes Baud was sanctioned by the EU, with consequences including travel bans, frozen assets, and limited monthly food funds (€500). Baud cannot travel to Switzerland; his bank accounts and property are frozen, and neighbors reportedly cook for him. Baab calls these measures extralegal, asserting they punish a person for an argument, not for crimes, and claims such sanctions illustrate a mechanism to suppress dissent. - Baab elaborates that Baud’s sanction is part of a broader pattern: “extralegal sanctions” against multiple individuals (Baud and 58 others) within and partly outside the EU, aimed at silencing those who challenge NATO or EU narratives. He argues this signals a “death of freedom” and a move to shut mouths through sanctions. - The host asks if the media’s shift toward propaganda is temporary or permanent. Baab responds that the transformation is structural: democracy in Europe is becoming anti-democratic and warmongering despotism. He cites Viktor Orban’s view that the EU intends to wage war against Russia, with propaganda and censorship as two sides of the same coin to close public debate. Baab says the war will be ugly, as Russia has warned it could escalate to nuclear conflict, and ties this to investments in Ukraine (Shell deal) that were lost when territories changed hands, implying economic motivations behind policy and casualties for profits. - The conversation turns to self-censorship. Baab describes widespread fear among journalists and academics; many refused to join a board intended to assist Baud, fearing repercussions. He cites a US Congress report alleging the EU manipulated eight elections, including Romania, Slovakia, and France. He also notes the EU Commission’s engagement with major platforms (Meta, Google, TikTok, X, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, Rumble, Reddit, OpenAI) to enforce content management under EU rules, threatening sanctions if not compliant. - Reputational attacks against critics are discussed. Baab shares experiences of smear campaigns, such as being misrepresented as a “Putin poll watcher” in Germany, and notes that state- and EU-funded NGOs sometimes amplify misinformation. He argues mainstream media generally ignores these issues, turning to “new media” and independent outlets as alternatives for information. - On Germany specifically, Baab identifies EU-level figures (German-origin leaders) who drive censorship: Ursula von der Leyen as EU Commission President (authorized COVID-19 disinformation monitoring), Vera Jorova (values and transparency), Thierry Breton (pressures on platforms), Prabhat Agarwal (Digital Services Act enforcement), and Renate Künast (translating DSA into practice). He says national governments decide sanctions but pass the burden to Brussels, creating a “kickback game.” He notes the German Bundestag extended EU sanctions into national law, punishing any helper of a sanctioned person with up to ten years’ imprisonment. - For optimism, Baab says Europe needs external help, such as the US Congress report, and citizens must seek alternative information sources and organize to defend democratic rights, including voting for different parties. He suggests that without broad public pushback, the propaganda system will persist. - The discussion closes with reflections on broader geopolitical dynamics, warnings about a multipolar world, and a dystopian vision of a Europe dominated by conflict and state control, with elites colluding with Western powers at the expense of ordinary citizens.

Ukraine's President Zelensky banned another opposition party, seized assets, and controlled TV networks. He extended his term, canceled elections under martial law, and suspended the constitution. This raises concerns about potential dictatorship and abuse of power.

Ukraine faced issues like human trafficking, organ trafficking, narco trafficking, and fascism. These threats are global, not just local. The world is on the brink of World War 3 due to these dangers. We are all at risk of being controlled by lies and manipulation from a common enemy.

Over a million Ukrainians are dead or permanently maimed, and the country is devastated. Recently, the Biden administration approved the use of anti-personnel mines, contradicting previous stances. These mines pose a danger to civilians, especially children, who may mistake them for toys. There's confusion about who is truly in charge in the White House, with speculation about figures like Anthony Blinken or Jake Sullivan. The situation in Ukraine is characterized by a lack of justification for violence, with the current Ukrainian leadership being described as dictatorial. The broader implications reflect a dying empire, marked by nihilism and desperation, leading to senseless violence reminiscent of historical collapses.

We are facing immense crises in the European Union. War has returned to our territory, and we need the EU more than ever. However, the far-right is gaining success in elections, with figures like Mr. Wilders campaigning against Muslims, immigration, and even the European Green Deal. If we don't realize the gravity of the situation and find the strength to convince others of the need to save the EU, it is in danger of extinction. We are facing both external and internal threats, unlike anything we have seen before. The upcoming election is crucial and decisive for our history. Putin's plan to pressure and weaken Europe is succeeding.

America and Europe are facing similar problems due to a globalist agenda. Europe is experiencing challenges with immigration from non-Western countries, leading to the erosion of national identities and sovereignty. Additionally, there is excessive spending on a nonexistent climate crisis and a war in Ukraine that is not Europe's concern. These actions are contributing to our own downfall.

President Zelensky of Ukraine has gained complete control of the media, banned political opposition parties, and even outlawed the second largest orthodox Christian church. Now, he has canceled the upcoming presidential elections. This is concerning because even during times of conflict, countries like South Vietnam and Iraq still managed to hold elections. President Biden claims to defend democracies, yet he continues to financially support Ukraine in their conflict against Russia, which is seen as a corrupt autocracy. Zelensky's motive for canceling elections is to silence critics of corruption and the war. Those in our government who support him may believe that canceling elections is justified during times of war.

Ukraine transitioned from atheism to Christianity, with strong government support for the church. They changed laws to define marriage as between a man and a woman, restricted abortion, and stopped overseas adoptions. The US has a history of expanding its empire, like in the Middle East, but faced resistance. Now, the US is moving eastward towards the Ukrainian or Russian border.

Over a million Ukrainians are dead or maimed, and the country is devastated. Recently, the Biden administration approved the use of anti-personnel mines, contradicting its previous stance against them. These mines, which resemble leaves, pose a danger to children and civilians. Questions arise about who is truly in charge in the White House, with speculation about figures like Antony Blinken or Jake Sullivan. The situation in Ukraine is grim, with the president acting like a dictator, suppressing dissent and imprisoning clergy. The complicity of Western European nations in this conflict reflects a dying empire, marked by nihilism and desperation. This chaotic period resembles the collapse of Rome, where a once-great power engages in self-destructive violence, leading to widespread suffering.

Zelensky's presidency has involved fulfilling obligations that have contributed to Ukraine's destruction. Key tasks include eliminating the Russian language, enforcing Ukrainian-only education, and creating a division within the Orthodox Church. He has suppressed freedom of speech by shutting down opposition media and banning political parties. Zelensky has also engaged in rewriting history, replacing Victory Day with Europe Day, and promoting a narrative that vilifies Russian identity. Furthermore, he has facilitated foreign control over Ukrainian land and turned the country into a testing ground for military and biological experiments. With significant foreign aid and military support, Ukraine's economy is heavily indebted, raising concerns about its future stability and sovereignty. Zelensky's actions reflect a commitment to foreign interests rather than the welfare of his citizens.

Speaker 0 says Western European populations support what he calls a “suicidal war on Russia through Ukraine” because elites in Zelensky’s Ukraine use corruption to maintain control over their population, rather than protecting countries from Russia or the Soviet Union. He adds that the elites aim to protect societies from becoming democratic. Speaker 1 agrees and frames the pattern as one where leaders who prioritize national interest are eliminated. He cites Libya as an example, saying Muammar Gaddafi cared about Libyans and Africans, but was assassinated for defying the central banking system and relying on gold with his own oil. He then says Venezuela today follows a similar pattern, where becoming nationalist and enriching one’s people leads to being killed or overthrown. Speaker 1 describes the mechanism as “Gladio networks” and intelligence agencies deploying operations against leaders. He recounts the Congo in the early 1960s after independence from Belgium, when Patrice Lumumba was elected prime minister. He says Lumumba approached the United States with a proposal to give the uranium that had been allocated to Belgium, but to use the portion going to Belgium to enrich Congolese people. He states that President Dwight D. Eisenhower would not meet with Lumumba and that Vice President Richard Nixon would not meet with him; Lumumba instead met with the secretary of state, who told him that he could not cut out Belgium and that Congo would receive the same arrangement as before, providing essentially nothing for building schools and hospitals. Speaker 1 says Lumumba then refused the deal, and that the Soviet Union would have been interested in uranium. Speaker 1 concludes that Lumumba was murdered by Operation Gladio elements controlled by Otto Skorzeny, described as Nazi, under Reinhard Gehlen’s German intelligence, the BND. He ends by saying that any prime minister or president who “stands up for their country” is targeted by an “international syndicate” seeking to control the world’s resources.

Zelenskyy has banned another political opposition party, seizing its members' assets through the Department of Justice. This follows his 2022 ban on major opposition parties and TV channels linked to them, consolidating control over Ukraine's largest television networks under government control. My presidential term ended on May 20th. I canceled elections, citing martial law and suspending the constitution to remain in power. While some argue this is justified due to the war, consider the implications. Accepting this rationale sets a precedent for leaders to suspend constitutions and cancel elections under similar pretenses, especially considering the ongoing conflicts involving Russia and China. They're already conditioning us to accept authoritarianism by misusing our Department of Justice to target political rivals.

The United States is in a state of decline, with no clear identity. Monuments are being defaced and destroyed, erasing our heritage. In Germany, Olaf Schulz is using the pretext of preparing for a fight with Russia to suppress opposition within the country. Similar fates await other Western governments, as their populations have had enough and will replace them with new leaders who are not like the current ones.

It strikes me as ironic that some of the most vocal anti-Trump activists are now supporting Zelensky, a leader exhibiting dictatorial behaviors. There are traits that help in identifying dictators, such as the consolidation of media under state control, the banning of opposition parties, and the criminalization of political dissent. Emerging dictators target political opponents, often jailing them to silence dissent. War is a common tool for control, leading to martial law and the suppression of religious organizations. To sustain power and wealth, they exploit their nation's resources and youth, avoiding fair elections at all costs. So, why are those who decried Trump as a dictator now backing someone who seems to fit the description?

I have committed many acts of violence, resulting in numerous deaths, including non-combatants, at the hands of the Zelensky government. Our priests and parishioners are being assaulted, and documented evidence of these beatings is available on savetheu0c.com. Elderly parents of soldiers fighting for Ukraine's liberation are frequently targeted by the SBU, the secret police, who wear death masks and Nazi insignias. Zelensky has dismantled civil society, suppressed free media, and imprisoned or sanctioned political opponents, accusing them of treason. Highlighting these issues, such as the jailing and torture of priests, shouldn't disqualify us from speaking out.

Europe was once the shining sun of the world, with incredible inventions and breathtaking cities. However, our civilization has been broken by destructive ideologies and institutions like the European Union. The EU accelerates and organizes the decay of our traditions, nations, and culture. It promotes demographic, gender, health, and digital transitions that erode our society's fabric. The EU seeks to create a new Europe, but Russia remains the last European country that stands for the old Europe. This is the state of Europe according to Forum's vision.

Russian elections are rigged, with political opponents being imprisoned or eliminated. This leads to a lack of checks and balances in Russia. As a result, one man decides to launch an unjustified and brutal invasion of Ukraine, mistakenly mentioning Iraq.

I have committed violence, and many people have been killed, including noncombatants, by the Zelensky government. Our priests and parishioners are being beaten, and videos of these incidents are available on savetheu0c.com. Elderly parents of those fighting for Ukraine's liberation are being attacked, often by the SBU secret police wearing death masks with Nazi insignias. Zelensky has destroyed civil society and free media, jailing, sanctioning, or charging his opponents with treason. Highlighting these issues is met with accusations of being disentitled to speak, as if mentioning the jailing and torturing of priests is forbidden.

Zelensky is a fascist or communist in Eastern Europe, evidenced by the actions of his secret police and state. We see it in his treatment of churches, and the prevalence of organized crime in Ukraine. The human trafficking and disappearance of tens of thousands of women and children into exploitative underworlds is shameless.

Zelensky's actions in Ukraine reveal a troubling authoritarianism, as he has banned opposition parties, shut down critical media, and arrested political opponents. Recently, he announced plans to ban the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, claiming it poses a threat due to its ties to Russia, despite its denunciation of the invasion. This move has been largely ignored or excused by U.S. leaders and media, who continue to support Zelensky as a defender of freedom. However, the reality is that Ukrainians face severe restrictions on their rights, including worship and political expression. The Ukrainian government is prioritizing its power over democratic principles, raising questions about the true nature of the support being given to them by the West.