reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Tucker Carlson interviews Robert F. Kennedy Jr., discussing various topics, including his lack of Secret Service protection during his presidential campaign. Kennedy explains that he applied for protection due to numerous threats, citing historical precedents where other candidates received protection much earlier than he did. He suggests that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) may be intentionally denying him protection to hinder his campaign financially. The conversation shifts to the war in Ukraine, where Kennedy argues that the U.S. has provoked Russia by expanding NATO despite assurances not to do so. He recounts historical commitments made to Gorbachev and discusses the consequences of U.S. involvement in Ukraine, including the 2014 coup that ousted the democratically elected government. Kennedy claims that the U.S. is using Ukraine as a proxy in a broader conflict with Russia, which he believes is detrimental to American interests. Kennedy also touches on immigration issues, describing his observations at the U.S.-Mexico border. He notes that many migrants are not from Central America but from various countries worldwide, often facilitated by cartels. He criticizes the Biden administration's open border policy and the exploitation of migrants, arguing that it harms both the migrants and American workers. Finally, Kennedy expresses concern about the economic struggles facing many Americans, highlighting rising food prices and increased credit card debt. He emphasizes that both major political parties have abandoned working-class Americans, leading to a sense of desperation among the populace. He concludes by stating his commitment to advocating for those who feel unheard in the current political landscape.

Dave Rubin opens the show with a humorous cold open referencing classic comedies, transitioning to a discussion about immigration and deportation led by Stephen Miller, Deputy Chief of Staff at the White House. Miller emphasizes the executive branch's authority under Article 2 of the Constitution to deport individuals deemed a threat, particularly focusing on illegal immigrants involved in crime. He argues that federal judges should not overstep their bounds in these matters, highlighting the tension between branches of government. Rubin critiques the left's stance on immigration, noting that Democrats seem to defend illegal immigrants while ignoring the safety of American citizens. He references a CNN discussion where Miller effectively communicates the legal framework surrounding deportations, contrasting it with the emotional arguments presented by leftist commentators. The conversation shifts to the broader implications of immigration policies, including the potential for violence and crime associated with illegal immigration. Rubin expresses concern over the left's priorities, suggesting they often neglect the rights and safety of American citizens in favor of protecting non-citizens. Rubin also touches on the political landscape, mentioning Trump's approach to peace negotiations in Ukraine and the ongoing scrutiny of Hunter Biden's financial dealings. He concludes by highlighting the left's internal struggles and the rise of more extreme figures within the Democratic Party, suggesting a lack of moderating voices.

In this conversation, Patrick Bet-David welcomes Cenk Uygur back for a discussion that covers a wide range of political topics, including the upcoming elections, the state of the Democratic Party, and various cultural issues. They reflect on the significance of the NBA playoffs as a metaphor for the current political climate, emphasizing the intensity of the upcoming election season. Cenk shares his thoughts on the recent film "Oppenheimer," praising its message about diversity and its historical context regarding the development of the atomic bomb. He argues that the contributions of Jewish scientists were crucial to the U.S. victory in World War II, highlighting the irony of Nazi anti-Semitism inadvertently aiding the Allies. The discussion shifts to current events, including the ongoing war in Ukraine, with Cenk expressing concern about the potential for escalation and the implications of U.S. involvement. He critiques the push for NATO expansion near Russia, suggesting it provoked the conflict. Cenk emphasizes the need for a nuanced approach to U.S. foreign policy, advocating for support of Ukraine without provoking further aggression from Russia. They also touch on the political landscape, discussing figures like Trump and Biden. Cenk argues that while Trump did not start new wars during his presidency, his unpredictability poses a risk, especially in the context of nuclear weapons. He expresses skepticism about the credibility of fears surrounding Trump starting a war, given his previous actions. The conversation then moves to the topic of climate change and mental health, with Cenk referencing a Wall Street Journal article that labels climate change obsession as a mental disorder. They discuss the implications of such views and the broader societal reactions to climate change. Cenk and Patrick explore the implications of recent political events, including the testimony of Devin Archer regarding Hunter Biden's business dealings. Cenk argues that while Hunter Biden's actions may be questionable, there is insufficient evidence to implicate Joe Biden directly in wrongdoing. He stresses the importance of evidence and due process in political discourse. The discussion also covers the cultural wars in America, particularly regarding LGBTQ+ issues and education. Cenk defends the rights of individuals to express their identities while acknowledging the complexities surrounding discussions of gender and sexuality in schools. He emphasizes the need for open dialogue and understanding, rather than divisive rhetoric. Cenk announces his new book, "Justice is Coming," which addresses the need for a progressive movement that can unite various factions within the Democratic Party. He argues that the party has been captured by corporate interests and that a grassroots movement is necessary to reclaim it. Throughout the conversation, Cenk and Patrick engage in a spirited debate about the future of American politics, the role of media, and the importance of addressing economic issues that resonate with the majority of Americans. They conclude by encouraging listeners to engage with the ideas presented and to consider the implications of the current political climate on future elections.

On January 29, 2024, Dave Rubin discussed significant issues including Ilhan Omar's controversial speech prioritizing Somalia's interests over American values, labeling her as part of a "Hamas caucus" within the Democratic Party. He highlighted the worsening border crisis, which he described as escalating into a constitutional crisis, with states pushing back against federal inaction. Rubin criticized the media's distortion of these issues and expressed concern over the Democrats' approach to immigration, suggesting it was intentional to increase voter bases. He presented alarming statistics about illegal immigration, noting that around 6 million people have entered the U.S. in the last three years, leading to rampant crime and drug issues. Rubin referenced a proposed bipartisan bill that would allow 5,000 illegal entries daily, equating to 1.8 million annually, and emphasized the need for stronger border enforcement. Rubin also mentioned the potential for a Trump and RFK Jr. ticket in the 2024 election, suggesting that RFK's shift to independent candidacy could disrupt traditional voting patterns. He concluded by urging viewers to wake up to the realities of the current political landscape and the necessity for creative solutions to address the challenges facing America.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. faced significant scrutiny during his recent testimonies in Congress. A protester, linked to Ben Cohen of Ben & Jerry's, criticized Medicaid cuts while connecting them to U.S. funding for military actions in Gaza. RFK Jr. discussed vaccines, stating he would likely vaccinate for measles but emphasized that people should seek advice from medical professionals rather than him. He faced tough questioning about cuts to the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), with critics highlighting the potential harm to vulnerable families. RFK Jr. argued that budget cuts do not equate to a lack of empathy, a stance that complicates his position given his history of advocating for government oversight.

Dave Rubin reflects on the historical allure of figures like Hitler and draws parallels to current political dynamics, emphasizing the dangers to democracy and freedom. He discusses the ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict, highlighting the complexities of U.S. involvement and the corruption in Ukraine. Rubin critiques the U.S. government's approach, suggesting that the war could have been avoided and questioning the motivations behind U.S. support for Ukraine, including corporate interests from banks like JP Morgan and BlackRock in reconstruction efforts. He raises concerns about illegal immigration, particularly in sanctuary cities, where released migrants, including violent offenders, pose public safety threats. Rubin connects these issues to broader societal problems, including declining life expectancy and rising drug use, suggesting a spiritual crisis in America. He concludes by questioning the competence of current leadership, particularly Joe Biden, in addressing these multifaceted challenges.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. expresses skepticism about Kamala Harris's ability to engage with foreign leaders, fearing she may be manipulated into supporting war, particularly with Russia. He reflects on his disillusionment with the Democratic Party, which he believes has shifted away from its historical values of peace and free speech, becoming aligned with neoconservative interests. Kennedy outlines five ways the left has gone too far, including its embrace of censorship and militarism. In discussing his unexpected alliance with Donald Trump, Kennedy notes that he initially rejected the idea of running with Trump due to personal and familial concerns. However, he acknowledges a significant transformation in the political landscape, with disaffected Democrats now aligning with Republicans. He emphasizes the importance of health crises in America, highlighting the alarming rise in chronic diseases and obesity driven by processed foods and harmful agricultural practices. Kennedy argues that the current health crisis is a pressing issue that needs to be addressed through executive actions rather than legislative measures, focusing on reforming the National Institutes of Health to prioritize research on chronic diseases. He believes that once sufficient scientific evidence is established regarding the harms of certain products, legal actions will follow, leading to significant changes in public health policy. Throughout the conversation, Kennedy critiques the Democratic Party's abandonment of democratic principles and free speech, expressing concern over the potential consequences of a Harris presidency. He concludes that the current trajectory could lead to irreversible damage to the country, particularly regarding civil rights and international relations. The discussion also touches on the need for a united front against censorship and the importance of grassroots movements to reclaim democracy.

In a conversation between Dave Rubin and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Kennedy discusses his affiliation with the Democratic Party, expressing disappointment in its current direction while maintaining hope for its redemption. He highlights a disconnect between traditional Democratic values and the party's current stance, noting that many working-class individuals and minorities feel neglected. Kennedy emphasizes the importance of civility and finding common ground rather than focusing on divisive issues. Kennedy addresses the media's treatment of him, describing it as a coordinated effort among legacy media to censor dissenting voices, particularly regarding COVID-19 and political narratives. He reveals ongoing litigation against the Trusted News Initiative, which he claims is a conspiracy among major media outlets to suppress alternative viewpoints. On the topic of big tech, Kennedy advocates for executive orders to prevent federal agencies from engaging in censorship and suggests reinstating the Smith-Mundt Act to prohibit government propaganda. He expresses confidence in reforming government agencies, citing his extensive experience in litigation against them. Kennedy also critiques the current Ukraine war, attributing it to neoconservative influence within the Biden administration and advocating for negotiations with Russia. He concludes by discussing his views on affirmative action and the need for a more inclusive political discourse, expressing a desire for a debate stage where diverse ideas can be presented.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. discusses the complexities of U.S.-Russia relations, emphasizing that regime change in Russia is not America's responsibility and could be dangerous given Russia's nuclear capabilities. He believes that fostering friendship with Russia is crucial and warns that current U.S. actions are not weakening Putin but rather pushing him closer to China. Kennedy expresses his admiration for science and engineering, advocating for epistemic humility and open debate in scientific discourse. He reflects on the founding principles of the United States, highlighting its role as a model of democracy and the importance of self-restraint in exercising freedom. He cites historical figures like Thomas Jefferson and Albert Camus to illustrate the necessity of moral courage and the human capacity to find meaning in absurdity. He critiques the U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding the Ukraine conflict, arguing that the West has provoked Russia since the end of the Cold War and that the current war is a proxy conflict driven by neoconservative agendas. Kennedy believes that the U.S. should engage in dialogue with both Russia and Ukraine to seek a peaceful resolution. Kennedy shares personal anecdotes about his family history and his father's teachings on empathy and moral courage, stressing the fragility of democracy and the importance of individual responsibility in resisting totalitarianism. He reflects on the lessons learned from historical atrocities, emphasizing the need for vigilance against the erosion of freedoms. On the topic of vaccines, Kennedy asserts that while he is not anti-vaccine, he advocates for vaccine safety and transparency in the pharmaceutical industry. He criticizes the regulatory capture of agencies like the FDA and highlights the need for accountability in vaccine development. He acknowledges the complexity of vaccine efficacy and safety, citing historical examples to illustrate his points. Kennedy discusses his personal journey with addiction and recovery, emphasizing the role of spirituality and moral decision-making in his life. He describes how he found meaning through service and self-restraint, drawing parallels between his experiences and philosophical ideas about existence and purpose. In closing, Kennedy reflects on the importance of integrity in journalism and the dangers of propaganda, advocating for a return to a more honest and skeptical press. He expresses a desire to unify people across political divides by focusing on shared values and the common good, rather than divisive rhetoric.

Joe Rogan and Robert Kennedy Jr. engage in a deep conversation about vaccines, public health, and the political landscape. Kennedy shares his journey from environmental activism to vaccine skepticism, highlighting how he initially accepted mainstream narratives about vaccines without question. He recounts how the pandemic prompted him to read his book, "The Real Anthony Fauci," which challenged his previous beliefs and led him to question the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Kennedy discusses his experiences with mothers of intellectually disabled children who attributed their children's conditions to vaccines, leading him to investigate the science behind vaccine safety. He expresses concern over the influence of pharmaceutical companies on regulatory agencies like the FDA and CDC, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability in public health. The conversation shifts to the broader implications of government policies, including the military-industrial complex and foreign interventions, particularly in Ukraine. Kennedy argues that the U.S. should focus on rebuilding the middle class and addressing domestic issues rather than engaging in endless wars abroad. Rogan and Kennedy also touch on the censorship of dissenting voices in the media and the challenges faced by those who question the prevailing narratives. Kennedy reflects on the importance of critical thinking and open dialogue in a democratic society, asserting that the current political climate stifles genuine discourse. Throughout the discussion, Kennedy emphasizes the need for a populist movement that unites people across political lines to address the pressing issues facing the country, including health care, economic inequality, and the environment. He expresses hope that his presidential campaign can inspire a return to the values of empathy and community that characterized his family's legacy.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. expresses deep concern about the potential for nuclear war, citing escalating tensions in the Middle East, particularly with Egypt and Syria mobilizing troops. He criticizes U.S. leadership for lacking a healthy fear of nuclear conflict and highlights the diminished state of the Israeli military compared to past decades. Kennedy recounts personal security threats he has faced as a presidential candidate, emphasizing the politicization of law enforcement and the denial of Secret Service protection despite his requests. He discusses the Democratic Party's shift, attributing it to fundraising changes and the influence of pharmaceutical companies. Kennedy argues that the party has become driven by fear, contrasting it with Franklin Roosevelt's vision of hope. He believes his campaign appeals to disaffected individuals who question authority, likening them to those who walked out of the Milgram experiment. On the Israel-Palestine conflict, he asserts that misconceptions about Israel's history persist, and he defends Israel's right to self-defense. He warns that if Israel were to disappear, it would lead to a power vacuum in the Middle East, jeopardizing U.S. national security. Kennedy advocates for a reduction in military spending and emphasizes the importance of Israel as a strategic ally. He also addresses the dangers of AI and censorship, proposing transparency in algorithms to mitigate manipulation.

Megyn Kelly welcomes Robert F. Kennedy Jr. back to her show, discussing his new documentary "The Real Anthony Fauci" and his recent book "Letter to Liberals." Kennedy emphasizes the need for accountability regarding COVID policies and critiques the suppression of dissenting voices during the pandemic. He argues that the liberal tradition values free speech and open debate, which he believes were undermined by government actions during the pandemic, including lockdowns and mandates that violated constitutional rights. Kennedy recounts a debate with a colleague who supported pandemic orthodoxy, highlighting the lack of respectful discourse and the vilification of those questioning official narratives. He expresses concern over the impact of lockdowns on children and the poor, citing studies that show significant IQ loss in children and increased mortality rates among disadvantaged groups. He argues that the pandemic response has strayed from the core values of liberalism, which prioritize civil rights and free expression. The conversation shifts to vaccine safety, with Kennedy challenging claims about vaccine efficacy and safety, particularly regarding myocarditis risks in young men. He cites studies indicating a higher risk of myocarditis from vaccines compared to COVID itself, questioning the narrative pushed by health authorities. Kennedy shares his skepticism about the data provided by pharmaceutical companies and the regulatory agencies, criticizing the lack of transparency and accountability in vaccine trials. Kennedy also discusses the censorship he faced for raising concerns about vaccines and the broader implications of government control over public health narratives. He expresses frustration over the lack of rigorous studies on vaccine-related injuries and the failure to address rising unexplained deaths among young people post-vaccination. The discussion touches on the ongoing war in Ukraine, with Kennedy revealing that his son has joined the fight. He reflects on the complexities of U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts, drawing parallels to historical events and emphasizing the need for a thorough debate on military actions. Kennedy advocates for understanding the motivations behind conflicts and the consequences of U.S. foreign policy decisions. Throughout the interview, Kennedy maintains a focus on the importance of open dialogue, scientific inquiry, and the need for accountability in public health and government actions.

Dave Rubin opens the April 22, 2025, episode of The Rubin Report by discussing the exhaustion of the Democratic Party, claiming they are out of ideas and resorting to defending criminals and jihadists, which he believes won't win them votes. He highlights an interview with Peter Thiel, who expresses optimism about the current political landscape, suggesting that the Democrats' lack of leadership and ideas presents an opportunity for change. Rubin critiques Elizabeth Warren's defense of President Biden's mental acuity, arguing that her statements reflect the broader dishonesty of Democrats. He emphasizes that the public is increasingly aware of these lies. He shares clips of Bernie Sanders facing backlash from his radical base for not being anti-Israel enough, illustrating the left's internal conflicts and lack of coherent ideas. Rubin also discusses a Maryland man, an illegal immigrant and MS-13 member, whose deportation has sparked media outrage, framing it as another example of Democrats prioritizing criminals over citizens. He critiques the media's portrayal of such individuals, calling out their bias. The conversation shifts to RFK Jr.'s comments on rising autism rates, which he attributes to environmental factors and vaccine schedules, igniting media backlash. Rubin defends RFK's inquiries into autism and criticizes the expert class for stifling debate. Finally, Rubin touches on the importance of open dialogue and the need to question authority, emphasizing that the current political climate requires more discussion rather than censorship. He concludes by inviting viewers to join the postgame show for further interaction.

Joe Rogan and Dave Smith discuss various topics, including the recent news surrounding Yevgeny Prigozhin's plane crash, speculating on the implications of his potential death after his mutiny against Vladimir Putin. They delve into the ongoing war in Ukraine, contrasting narratives about the conflict's progress and the realities on the ground, including the heavy losses faced by Ukrainian forces. Smith critiques the left's support for the war, questioning the morality of prolonging the conflict and the consequences for Ukraine. The conversation shifts to the historical context of U.S. involvement in Ukraine, touching on the 2014 coup and the role of American policy in shaping the current situation. They discuss the hypocrisy of U.S. leaders who criticize Russia while ignoring their own military actions and interventions. The discussion highlights the complexities of foreign policy, the influence of the military-industrial complex, and the challenges of understanding the motivations behind U.S. actions abroad. Smith emphasizes the importance of recognizing the consequences of U.S. foreign policy decisions, particularly in the context of the war in Ukraine and the potential for escalation. They also touch on the political landscape in the U.S., including the rise of figures like RFK Jr. and Vivek Ramaswamy, who challenge the status quo and offer alternative perspectives on issues like the pandemic response and government overreach. The dialogue underscores the disillusionment many Americans feel toward the political establishment, the media, and the narratives surrounding current events. They express concern about the erosion of trust in institutions and the implications for democracy. The conversation concludes with reflections on the need for a more honest and open discourse about the realities of governance, foreign policy, and the impact of political decisions on everyday lives.

The All-In podcast features a discussion with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a presidential hopeful for 2024. The hosts introduce Kennedy, highlighting his lineage as the nephew of President John F. Kennedy and son of Senator Robert F. Kennedy. Kennedy's background includes a career as an environmental lawyer and activism focused on public health, which has made him a controversial figure due to his criticisms of pharmaceutical safety and COVID-19 restrictions. The conversation shifts to foreign policy, particularly regarding the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Kennedy expresses skepticism about U.S. involvement, suggesting that the war has been prolonged by neoconservative interests in Washington. He argues that the U.S. should have pursued peace negotiations and cites the Minsk Accords as a viable solution. Kennedy believes that the humanitarian mission has been overshadowed by a desire for regime change in Russia, leading to significant Ukrainian casualties. On military spending and the U.S. debt crisis, Kennedy emphasizes the need for fiscal responsibility, criticizing the military budget and advocating for a focus on rebuilding the middle class. He expresses concern about the growing national debt and the implications for social safety nets like Social Security and Medicare, stating that he would not support cuts to these programs. Kennedy also addresses the role of intelligence agencies, asserting that they have become too intertwined with corporate interests, leading to a lack of accountability. He advocates for transparency and accountability within these agencies and supports pardoning whistleblowers like Julian Assange and Edward Snowden. The discussion touches on vaccines and the COVID-19 response, with Kennedy arguing that the pandemic was mishandled due to a militarized approach rather than a public health-focused one. He criticizes the suppression of early treatment options and the prioritization of vaccine development over effective treatments. Kennedy's views on education and social issues are also explored. He supports bodily autonomy but believes that children should not make irreversible decisions regarding gender reassignment without parental consent. He emphasizes the importance of teaching history honestly, including the darker aspects of American history, while fostering a sense of optimism among students. The podcast concludes with reflections on Kennedy's anti-establishment stance and the challenges he faces in gaining media attention. The hosts express their appreciation for the candid discussion and the need for more platforms that allow for open dialogue on controversial topics.