reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker sets out to “clear up” fascism, communism, and totalitarianism by arguing they are not simple opposites but rival forms arising from the same collectivist impulse. He cites Mussolini’s definition of fascism as corporatism—the merger of corporate and government power—and the view that “for the fascist, everything is the state and nothing human or spiritual exists, much less has value outside the state.” He then paraphrases Ayn Rand, saying “Fascism and communism are not two opposites, but two rival gangs fighting over the same territory” based on the collectivist principle that man is the rightless slave of the state. He notes that the Nazis’ National Socialism fused unions, industry, and state into a totalitarian system, and labels that form of totalitarianism as fascism. Turning to today, he argues Mussolini’s corporatist definition best fits recent developments, with “the corporate and governments joining into a merger” aided by the World Economic Forum (WEF), United Nations (UN), and related entities. He traces a historical lineage: in the late 1950s, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund funded the Special Studies Project, with Nelson Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger involved, aiming to “shape a new world order” across spiritual, economic, political, and social dimensions. The CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) and David Rockefeller are described as coordinating global leaders to build a globalist system, identifying global challenges—health, pandemics, population, climate change—as pathways to global governance. He emphasizes climate change as an opportunity to promote globalism, noting Harvard’s International Seminar (funded by Ford, Rockefeller, and others) and Klaus Schwab’s rise to prominence, leading to the European Economic Forum in 1971 and its evolution into the World Economic Forum (WEF). Key players and structures are listed: Barbara Ward’s push for sustainable development and climate focus; the Club of Rome and its Limits to Growth; Giovanni Agnelli linking banking and big oil with Rockefeller figures; the Davos forum’s shift to sustainability, stakeholder capitalism, and climate. He highlights funding and influence from major banks and financial institutions, the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, and Bilderberg participants, asserting a broad network guiding global policy. From the 1970s onward, he covers milestones: the 1972 Stockholm conference on climate, the 1987 World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland) and Our Common Future; Agenda 21 (1992) from Rio; Bilderberg meetings; the 1990s and 2000s’s Davos and the emergence of the Global Leaders of the WEF; the 2020 initiative and the identification of pandemics, climate risk, and digital governance as future imperatives. He notes the 2006 Global Risks report’s mention of a pandemic and misinformation, arguing they anticipated the 2020 pandemic and the censorship that followed. He argues that public-private partnerships represent totalitarianism, with “the state and corporate power” merged and “the politicians… taking orders from the top levels.” He contends the UN Global Goals and the 2019 formal joining of WEF with the UN formalize a global government, promoting the Fourth Industrial Revolution to reshape the physical world, environment, space surveillance, and digital technology. The Decade of Action (2019) culminates in a 2020 pandemic as part of a planned sequence toward global governance. He concludes that fascism, communism, and totalitarianism are effectively the same at core: “the state” or “the corporate governmental” structure controlling individuals, with “fascism and communism” as rival narratives used to advance a single collectivist end. The closing thanks acknowledge supporters and invite further contributions.

The pandemic has devastated lives and economies, but a green recovery offers a chance to rethink how we live and do business. We need an economic model that prioritizes nature and the transition to net zero, pursuing sustainable, inclusive growth. Climate action is a difficult fight, but businesses, investors, and consumers are increasingly prioritizing sustainability, creating a virtuous circle. By leveraging market forces and the private sector, there is hope for transformation. However, we are at the last hour, and urgent action is needed to rescue the situation. We know what to do, and must now do it.

The World Economic Forum, founded in 1971 by Klaus Schwab, is accused of promoting authoritarianism and Marxist ideology. It claims to address global issues like climate change and systemic racism, but critics argue that it is anti-capitalist and seeks to undermine Western values. The organization advocates for strict COVID measures, including lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations, and supports the idea of a "great reset" to reimagine economic policies. The World Economic Forum has been accused of promoting the abolition of private property, which critics argue is a form of communism. It is important to be aware of their influence and protect individual liberties against government intrusion.

The WEF has introduced 15 minute cities, known as C40 cities. In these cities, petrol and diesel cars will be banned in favor of electric vehicles. Residents will receive calorie-controlled meal plans via text. Violations could lead to frozen bank accounts. This plan, supported by the WEF and London's mayor, aims to be implemented globally. Critics fear it will restrict freedom and create a perpetual state of lockdown. This information has not been widely discussed.

The pandemic has devastated lives and economies, but a green recovery offers a chance to rethink how we live and do business. We need an economic model that prioritizes nature and the transition to net zero, pursuing sustainable, inclusive growth. Climate action is a difficult fight, but businesses, investors, and consumers are increasingly prioritizing sustainability, creating a virtuous circle. By leveraging market forces and the private sector, there is hope for transformation. However, we are at the last hour, and urgent action is needed to rescue the situation. We know what to do, and must now do it.

Climate change is an existential threat that we all recognize, but addressing it creates value. Society increasingly values achieving net zero, spurred by sustainable development goals, the Paris agreement, social movements, and government action. Companies and investors who are part of the solution will be rewarded, while those lagging behind will be punished. Investing in new technologies and changing business practices to reduce and eliminate climate change is vital.

In Great Britain, some counties have passed legislation to impose climate lockdowns. These lockdowns require the establishment of 15-minute cities, where people are only allowed to leave their immediate area a few times a year. However, those with more money can buy passes from others, leaving the less fortunate in these restricted neighborhoods while the wealthier individuals can freely travel wherever they want.

In March 2020, the Western world followed China's lead and implemented measures for climate change. The Center For Biological Diversity estimates that this would grant Joe 130 new executive powers, similar to those during the 9/11 and COVID emergencies. These powers could extend to governors and mayors, potentially resulting in another lockdown. Climate activists are advocating for restrictions on air travel and odd-even gas station days. Utilities are working with local governments to control thermostats during heat waves. The LA Times even suggests using blackouts to meet emission goals. The ruling class wants a climate emergency to limit our freedoms, similar to the COVID restrictions. Additionally, there are concerns about the impact on cows and the collapse of transportation and agriculture systems. Measures such as banning gas cars and limiting nitrogen-based fertilizer are being implemented without congressional votes, bypassing democracy. This is all happening under the guise of a climate emergency.

Nature underpins every aspect of the economy; air, water, soil, oceans, and minerals—the building blocks of economies. While these models of economic growth have driven global prosperity, their unintended consequences are not sustainable on a finite planet. Resource extraction and pollution—greenhouse gas emissions, sewage, plastics—are beyond the earth's carrying capacity, causing significant societal and financial costs. This shows up as financial risk for institutions. Lack of water is leading to disruption of operations of supply chains where water is needed as an essential input for manufacturing or power production. The degradation of soil is leading to reduced agricultural yields. The decline of pollinator species is also having an impact on agriculture. So that's leading to direct financial risks for organizations, for businesses, and ultimately for investors.

The 15-minute city initiative by c40 cities will ban petrol and diesel cars, control food intake, and freeze bank accounts for non-compliance. The WEF and WBF are pushing this agenda globally, with London's mayor as the chair. This plan is concerning as it restricts freedom and could lead to a lifetime of limitations. It's a hidden agenda that needs more public awareness.

The C40 consortium, made up of 40 major cities, aims for citizens to only have 3 articles of clothing, 95% reduction in private car ownership, and limited flights. This could greatly impact industries and living standards. Some believe this green agenda may sacrifice the working class and poor for environmental goals.

World leaders, CEOs, and the global elite meet annually in Davos to address global issues. However, after years of meetings, environmental problems have worsened. The World Economic Forum (WEF) has influential members like Larry Fink and Kristalina Georgieva. Mark Carney is a core member and on the board of trustees. BlackRock, a major player, owns most US banks, pharmaceutical companies, and oversees 10% of global stocks. They also have influence in governments. The WEF partners with companies like Google, Amazon, and Facebook. Factcheck.org, funded by Johnson and Johnson, may not be impartial. Project Syndicate and press agencies shape media reporting. Klaus Schwab, founder of the WEF, promotes the Great Reset and Agenda 2030, which aim to reshape society and establish a world government.

The C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group aims for zero meat and dairy consumption, limited clothing items, no private vehicles, and fewer flights to combat climate change. This plan, outlined in the "Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5 Degree World" report, is supported by Michael Bloomberg and around 100 cities worldwide. Recent progress includes New York City limiting meat and dairy in institutions, the UK banning gas-powered vehicles after 2035, and France banning short-haul flights. Critics argue that these measures are about social control rather than climate change, as globalist leaders continue to fly in private jets and wealthy individuals buy up farmland. There are even proposals to genetically modify humans to be allergic to red meat and shrink human size through eugenics.

In 2020, a powerful organization known as stakeholders initiated a 10-year shift towards stakeholder capitalism, marking the decline of shareholder capitalism. Their agenda includes controlling the food supply chain by 2030, with Bill Gates becoming the largest individual farmland owner. They promote GMO foods and aim to ban livestock, suggesting alternatives like artificial meat and insects as food sources. Climate change is used as a justification for these changes, with warnings about food insecurity and famine. Protests by farmers are escalating globally, with thousands demonstrating against government policies that threaten family farms. The situation raises concerns about food security and the future of agriculture. For more information, visit yellow.forum.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is pushing for the Great Reset and the 4th Industrial Revolution, which includes a personal carbon social credit system to track everything individuals do. The WEF is encouraged by the global acceptance of COVID-19 restrictions and plans to use this to further their control. They are also using blockchain technology and central bank digital currencies to monitor activities. The WEF advocates for increased costs on carbon-intensive activities and reducing demand for certain things, potentially including meat, air travel, and family size. They want to set personal levels of acceptable emissions and redefine a fair share of emissions. Critics argue that this agenda is being implemented by design, with attacks on nation states and individuals who oppose it. Anglosphere leaders are pushing for global censorship and taxation, while celebrating movements that rely on deceit and chaos. The media largely reports the official interpretation of events, and these agents of change are willing to lie without fear of exposure. Despite all this, many people refuse to acknowledge what is happening.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is pushing for a personal carbon social credit system that tracks everything people do, buy, and eat. They are encouraged by the global acceptance of COVID-19 restrictions and plan to use this to further their control over society. The WEF is also promoting their 4th Industrial Revolution, which utilizes blockchain technology and central bank digital currencies to monitor all activities. They advocate for increased costs on carbon-intensive activities and reducing demand for certain things, potentially including meat, air travel, and family size. They want to set personal levels of acceptable emissions and redefine a fair share of emissions. These actions are part of a larger agenda to reshape society, with global censorship, taxation, and attacks on opposing governments and individuals. Despite these developments, many people remain unaware or refuse to acknowledge them.

- The video discusses energy lockdowns as a forecast reality already beginning in some countries and likely to ripple worldwide. The host emphasizes the content as potentially disturbing and cites a recent IEA report titled “sheltering from oil shocks,” along with data from multiple countries and other worst‑case scenario reports. - Core plan described: the IEA envisions energy lockdowns that require major changes in daily life and mobility. Measures include: - Working from home three out of five days per week. - Dramatically reducing driving speeds and limiting private car access to cities. - Reducing public transport use and expanding car sharing. - Assessing whether one has a “key worker” reason to travel. - Reducing air travel by 40% or requiring a strong justification for flights. - Promoting 15‑minute cities to minimize travel. - Encouraging walking or cycling, greater public transport use, and eco‑driving techniques. - Prioritizing electric vehicles, with questions raised about how this aligns with other fuel choices. - The host reiterates that these measures would be more severe than COVID lockdowns. They reference the ongoing energy disruptions: strikes on Russian oil refineries, destruction/damage to about 40 energy sites in the Middle East, Europe’s reliance on LNG with tanker reroutes to Asia due to higher payments, and broader geopolitical tensions affecting energy flows. - Worst‑case scenario categories described in the report: 1) Immediate daily survival hits: low energy caps on homes (heating limited to about 15–18°C, with rolling blackouts in winter), no air conditioning in heat waves, fridges/freezers potentially turned off, cooking restricted if power or gas are limited, water pumps and treatment plants failing, possible boiling water orders, toilets and sewage issues, and widespread darkness with limited internet/TV/charging. 2) Health system breakdown: hospitals running on diesel generators, surgeries canceled, ventilators/oxygen/dialysis impacted, home medical devices useless, ambulance and emergency services underfunded or overwhelmed. 3) Food, water, and supply chain collapse: irrigation and farming halted due to fuel shortages, processing and distribution disrupted, empty shelves and panic buying, potential black markets and rationing reminiscent of wartime scenarios, with starvation risks in weeks in some countries and severe inflation. 4) Transport and mobility lockdowns: fuel rationing (odd/even days), reduced public transport, more cycling/walking, restricted medical visits, difficulty moving goods, economic and job devastation, and unemployment possibly skyrocketing (20–40% in worst cases). 5) Economic and societal collapse: energy‑intensive sectors shut, currency printing for stimulus, social order strain including riots and migrations, education stopping (home schooling), innovation and investment freezes, potential grid or civil breakdown, and excess deaths from extreme temperatures, starvation, and illness. 6) Long‑term societal damage: prolonged crisis causing massive economic contraction, widespread disruption to infrastructure and services, and deep social disruption. - The host notes current real‑world developments that align with these concerns: numerous countries declaring emergencies, fuel supply challenges, and policy actions such as fuel rationing or travel restrictions. Examples cited include the Philippines declaring a state of emergency, Vietnam and Bangladesh facing oil issues, Slovenia introducing fuel rationing, and South Korea implementing odd‑license‑plate driving bans for public sector workers. - The video closes with warnings about the potential severity and urges viewers to prepare, arguing that comments by some media or officials predicting quick recoveries could mislead families about the risk. A sense of urgency is conveyed about taking energy and logistical precautions in light of the described scenarios.

Speaker 0 presents a critical view of “fifteen minute cities,” arguing the goal is to corral people into an area where they can be easily surveilled and controlled. The speaker contends the central interest is how a small, ruling elite can govern the many forever without the many ever being able to complain or act. The result, they claim, is a global governance project that uses big tech and mass surveillance to create a new way of life and system of living, with a particular aim of reducing the share of wealth or resources held by the many—the 99 or so. The speaker connects these ideas to the COVID era, suggesting that groups like the World Economic Forum (WEF) popularized policies framed as sustainability but ultimately designed and implemented to limit ownership and control by individuals. Specifically, the speaker cites WEF proposals such as not owning cars—renting them instead—and the deployment of autonomous fleets to drive people around within a defined radius. They also note proposals around not owning homes but renting and sharing apartments when unoccupied. A concrete example given is the Columbus smart city initiative tied to the Columbus Partnership, which Wexner chaired for roughly twenty years (2001–2021). The speaker notes that Columbus received a large Department of Transportation grant and private funding, possibly from Wexner, to implement a system where private car ownership would disappear in favor of fleets of autonomous vehicles. In this system, the autonomous cars would determine where people go, with specific routes available for payment and use. The speaker references the National Security Commission on AI, chaired by Eric Schmidt of Google, which reportedly described, as part of a strategy to beat China in AI, the need to end private car ownership in the United States and replace it with autonomous fleets (Waymo-like) guided by AI to manage where people go and work, implying a nationwide shift toward centralized planning of mobility. Finally, the speaker connects these initiatives to the Technocracy Inc. model, noting influence from Taylorism and industrial-revolution-era thinking that prioritized efficiency and micromanagement. The implication is that the new systems aim to extract data and monetize daily life, elevating efficiency and control above individual autonomy.

The speaker questions whether it is strange that leading environmental organizations have met for fifty years with CEOs of heavily polluting corporations while the natural world keeps getting worse. They say that critics of the WAF are right when considering who the most important partners are that account for almost 71% of the WES budget. The partners include BlackRock, the Open Society Foundations, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and many other large corporations, of whom Vanguard and BlackRock own the shares directly or indirectly.

- In collusion with the world's most powerful people, the heads of our governments have enacted a ten year transition to a universal political system called stakeholder capitalism. - It's a funeral of shareholder capitalism and it's a birth of stakeholder capitalism. - The World Economic Forum is now very much engaged into this initiative of shaping a great reset. - Stakeholder capitalism replaces both shareholder and state capitalism with a single global political system that provides authority to a group of people called stakeholders. - To ensure that both people and the planet prosper, four key stake holders play a crucial role. They are governments, civil society such as education bodies, companies, and the international community such as the UN and European Union. - The heads of these organizations are exclusive elite members of the World Economic Forum. - The Chinese social credit system forces compliance by punishing people who break the government's rules.

I've examined the C40 consortium agenda, which includes major global cities pushing for extreme measures. They propose limiting citizens to three articles of clothing per year, drastically reducing private car ownership by 95%, and allowing only one short-haul flight every three years. This would severely impact the travel and tourism industries, particularly in Europe. The overarching aim seems to be an 85% reduction in Western living standards, deemed necessary for a sustainable planet by certain globalist groups. This agenda appears to prioritize bureaucratic ambitions and radical leftist goals, potentially sacrificing the working class and the poor in the process.

The speaker discusses the so-called Great Reset, insisting it is not a conspiracy theory and noting that it has been referenced by prime minister Trudeau in a United Nations speech. The speaker explains that Pierre Polyev, the federal conservative finance critic, recently raised concerns about this concept and was criticized by some in the media and by liberals for allegedly promoting conspiracy theories. According to the speaker, the Great Reset is the name of Klaus Schwab’s book. Schwab’s thesis, as described, is that governments and societies should “seize the opportunity of the public health and economic crisis to reimagine the world and radically change policies.” The speaker characterizes the proposed changes as a “grab bag of left wing ideas” that would mean less freedom and more government intervention, including policies that would “create massive poverty,” with particular emphasis on energy policy. Klaus Schwab is identified as the president and founder of the World Economic Forum, also known as the Davos Summit. The speaker labels Davos as “the biggest gathering of global hypocrites in history,” describing it as a ski village in Switzerland where, every February, thousands of wealthy individuals, including billionaires, millionaires, global CEOs, and politicians, fly in with private airplanes to spend a week lecturing the world, including working people, about reducing their carbon footprint. The speaker asserts that the Great Reset is advocated by influential people and even alluded to by Trudeau, though the discussion centers on what the reset entails and how it would impact policy, government power, and energy policy.

Speaker 0: We tend to think about capital as only financial capital—cash and financial assets—but that is not the only value our economies depend on. Every aspect of the economy is fundamentally dependent on nature: the air we breathe, the water we drink, the soil, the oceans for the food we consume, and the minerals needed for technology and infrastructure. Without these forms of natural capital, economies wouldn’t exist; they are the fundamental building blocks. Yet the ways we have grown our economies and our models of economic development have been incredibly successful for global prosperity. But the unintended consequences of current growth models are not sustainable on a finite planet. The resources we draw from Earth and the pollution and waste we emit—greenhouse gas emissions, sewage, plastics into the ocean—are beyond the Earth’s carrying capacity. This is leading to significant direct impacts on society and substantial financial costs for the economy. Macro-level calculations show these costs, and they’re also showing up in practical ways as we breach environmental boundaries and undermine nature. These breaches translate into financial risks for institutions: lack of water disrupts operations and supply chains where water is an essential input for manufacturing or power production; soil degradation reduces agricultural yields; the decline of pollinator species affects agriculture. All of this leads to direct financial risks for organizations, for businesses, and ultimately for investors. The root cause is that decision-making within businesses and financial institutions currently relies on financial data and metrics that do not factor in nature. Nature is treated within the economy as though it is unlimited and predominantly free, and the risks and harms are not costed in financial terms. While macro-level costs can be calculated, they are not integrated into day-to-day decision making. The consequence is that our economies are placed at fundamental risk. We cannot do business on a dead planet. To protect natural systems, one solution is to bring nature onto the balance sheet—bring nature into the ways decisions are made within business, allocate a value to it, and integrate it into accounting and financial mechanisms.

The World Economic Forum, founded in 1971, is accused of promoting authoritarianism and Marxist ideology. It claims to have influence over government cabinets, including those in Canada, Argentina, and France. The organization advocates for globalist issues like climate change and systemic racism, while also pushing for an online digital identity. Critics argue that the Forum is anti-capitalist and seeks to undermine Western values. They promote stakeholder capitalism, which prioritizes climate change over wealth creation. The Forum supports strict COVID measures, such as lockdowns and vaccine mandates, and aims to reimagine economic policies through the concept of the "Great Reset." Critics fear this could lead to communism and the abolition of private property. It is important to monitor the Forum's influence and protect individual liberties.