TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

First speaker: Implant aborted baby parts into lab animals. You heard of that sort of research? Second speaker: We did an analysis a few years ago showing that over ninety percent of experiments with using human fetal tissue and putting them involved animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID. First speaker: Do you know where they're getting the aborted human fetal tissue? Second speaker: A lot of it is happening at colleges and universities that have affiliated hospitals that perform that procedure. First speaker: Madam Chair, I think Second speaker: we First speaker: need to look into that as well.

The speaker admits to using babies of imprisoned mothers and individuals under colonial rule to study experimental vaccines, including in the Belgian Congo with almost a million people. Another speaker raises concerns about the safety of genetically modified organisms used in medicines and the practice of injecting them into children's arms. Safety testing and potential side effects are mentioned.

Speaker 0 describes a unit in Saima that went into African countries; "And how was that done exactly?" "Through inoculation. Through vaccines. Vaccines." "Pretending to inoculate people and that type of thing. The idea being to kill black people? Yeah. To eradicate black people." "There you must understand the concept was that AIDS was a killer. It was incurable at that point in time, so it was led to believe that if infected people, it was the quick non militaristic approach to eliminate black people." "And that is something you know for a fact that AIDS was actively being Yes. Spread to Yes. Other countries? Yes. To African countries."

During cross-examination, Speaker 1 describes fetal tissue work: the Wistar Institute study involving 76 fetuses, all three months or older when aborted and normally developed. Tissues were harvested by coworkers, cut up, and cultured, including pituitary gland, lung, skin, kidney, spleen, and heart (tongue probably). In his career, he says he worked with “quite a few” fetuses, but cannot recall exact numbers. He notes objections to using aborted fetal tissue in vaccines and cites that “The Catholic Church has actually issued a document on that which says that individuals who need the vaccine should receive the vaccines regardless of the fact, and that I I think it implies that I am the individual who will go to hell because of the use of aborted tissues, which I am glad.” Regarding religion, he says “Vaccination is always under attack by religious zealots who believe that the will of God includes death and disease?” and answers “Yes” and “Are you an atheist? Yes.”

The speaker is questioned about their work with vaccines and the use of fetuses. They confirm being an author of an article that involved a study at the Wistar Institute using 76 fetuses. The fetuses were 3 months or older and were normally developed. Various organs were harvested from the fetuses, including the pituitary gland, lung, skin, kidney, spleen, heart, and possibly the tongue. When asked about the total number of fetuses they have worked with, the speaker cannot provide an exact number but mentions working with quite a few. They are aware of objections to the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines, but state that individuals who need vaccines should receive them regardless of this issue. The speaker also expresses disagreement with religious beliefs that oppose vaccination.

Animal rights activists have more influence than vaccine companies and anti-abortion activists. There is concern over the lack of outcry regarding human babies born alive at 5 to 6 months old for research purposes. These babies are delivered alive and their hearts are cut out without anesthesia. The speaker emphasizes that they wouldn't do this to a mouse. The conversation then shifts to discussing the use of fetuses in vaccine production. Stanley Plotkin, a scientist, allegedly used various parts of aborted fetuses for vaccines. The speaker confirms that scientists purchase different body parts for research purposes. The speaker mentions receiving a catalog with prices for body parts from 20 years ago. The conversation concludes by acknowledging the moral implications and transitioning to discussing the science.

The speaker discusses the CDC report on Merck's Heptavax vaccine and its alleged contamination with HIV in the 1980s. They highlight the CDC's data, which shows a significant increase in HIV infection rates among trial participants. The speaker also mentions the controversial methods used to produce the vaccine, including the use of infected feces and chimpanzee blood. They suggest that the HIV contamination was not properly disclosed to the public and that the vaccine was sold in poor countries while safe versions were introduced in wealthier markets. The speaker proposes the establishment of a neutral foundation to investigate the issue further and requests support for this initiative.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they personally administered any COVID-19 vaccinations and informs them they may be personally liable and prosecuted under the Nuremberg Code. Speaker 0 claims COVID was a hoax and the shots are for depopulation, having killed or permanently disabled millions. Speaker 1 states the company is liable, not them, because they made sure beforehand that the company would take responsibility and support them administering the shots.

Speaker 1, a doctor, admits to working with 2 fetuses in their personal work related to vaccines. They confirm being an author of an article that involved 76 fetuses at the Wistar Institute. Various organs, including the pituitary gland, lung, skin, kidney, spleen, heart, and possibly the tongue, were harvested from these fetuses. The doctor cannot recall the exact number of fetuses they have worked with throughout their career but mentions studying them before using them for vaccine development. They are aware of objections to the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines, including religious concerns. The doctor stands by their statement that vaccinations are often criticized by religious zealots who believe that death and disease are part of God's will.

The speaker admits to using orphans and mentally handicapped individuals to study experimental vaccines in the 1960s, stating that it was a common practice at the time. They also acknowledge writing a letter expressing the belief that experiments should be performed on those less likely to contribute to society, such as children with disabilities. The speaker confirms using babies of mothers in prison and individuals under colonial rule in the Belgian Congo for vaccine studies, involving almost a million people. They mention changing their views since then.

The speaker confirms using orphans, babies of mothers in prison, and individuals under colonial rule to study an experimental vaccine. They also confirm doing so in the Belgian Congo.

The speaker states that vaccines contained 40 different viruses that were being inactivated. The yellow fever vaccine contained leukemia virus due to the crude science of the time. The speaker says they were not reporting AIDS virus at the time, but they had a disease virus. The speaker says it was good science at the time because they didn't worry about these viruses.

J. Marion Sims performed surgeries on enslaved black women without anesthesia. The Tuskegee experiment withheld penicillin from black men with syphilis. Puerto Rican women were given experimental birth control pills, resulting in seizures and hemorrhages. At Edgewood Arsenal, over 60,000 troops were exposed to nerve gas and LSD. The Navy sprayed San Francisco with bacteria linked to pneumonia. The Pentagon released weaponized mosquitoes in Florida. Soldiers were infected with biological agents in Operation White Coat. Millions were injected with the SV40 virus. Military planes sprayed mock bioweapons on civilian cities. Pregnant women at Vanderbilt drank radioactive iron. Orphans were fed radioactive milk. MK Ultra used extreme electroshock and sensory deprivation. Lyme disease mutations were researched at Fort Detrick. Vaccines are claimed to have catastrophic fertility side effects, micro clots, graphene, and prion contamination. The US funded gain of function research in Wuhan. Anthony Fauci funneled millions into weaponizing viruses. Government agencies are accused of experimenting, burning records, and denying the truth.

The speaker questions the safety of Thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative in vaccines, asserting it hasn't been adequately tested since 1929 when Lilly tested it on 27 meningitis patients, all of whom died. Despite this, the speaker claims Thimerosal has been used since the 1930s. The speaker challenges the witness to definitively state that the amount of mercury injected into babies is harmless. The witness admits it's impossible to make such a categorical statement with 100% certainty. The speaker then asks if it's possible that even trace amounts of mercury could neurologically damage a child. The witness says they don't think it has that capacity, but concedes they don't have evidence for every child and dose. The speaker expresses frustration at the difficulty in addressing the issue.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they have ever used orphans, mentally handicapped individuals, babies of mothers in prison, or individuals under colonial rule to study experimental vaccines. Speaker 1 admits to using orphans, but does not recall using mentally handicapped individuals specifically. They acknowledge that it was common practice in the 1960s. Speaker 1 confirms using babies of mothers in prison and individuals under colonial rule, including in the Belgian Congo, where the experiment involved nearly a million people.

The speaker claims that the MMR vaccine contains millions of pieces from cultured cell lines derived from aborted fetuses. They allege the rubella virus is grown on these cell lines. The speaker references a study involving over 70 healthy fetuses aborted specifically for research. According to the speaker, these fetuses were dissected into small pieces, and attempts were made to culture viruses on them to determine the optimal body part for virus growth. The speaker states that some of these abortions occurred past the first trimester.

Speaker 0: It is a report that concludes that The United States official foreign policy signed into law in 1975 by president Ford, and when I say signed into law, it's called a presidential directive, is the reduction of population in 12 foreign twelve twelve specific foreign countries. Not the control of population, the reduction of population. And so it explains the ways we're gonna do this is through medicalizing birth control, never was before. You didn't need a doctor to get a condom, and to go around and talk to villages everywhere and say, you want a reproductive health freedom, don't you? You know what most women want on the planet Earth? Babies. They're they're not looking for reproductive health freedom was a term for have fewer babies. Right? There is a very potent move in official US foreign policy to reduce population in other countries. Now why? Philippines or or Indonesia. Why? They state it directly in the Kissinger report because it's classified. They wanted to reduce those countries' development so that they wouldn't need their own raw materials because we want them, the metals, etcetera. It is dark as shit, the Kissinger reports. It's not and it's not classified anymore. You can, you know, ask chat GPT about it to give you quotes from it. And so this whole business of population reduction is now another third rail I'm stepping on. Right? Nobody wants it. What are you you're nuts. No. A lot of people want it. A lot of people believe, obviously, Bill Gates, that 8,000,000,000 people was the number where we must turn it around, which is where we are supposedly now. And the Kissinger report, I was a kid. I didn't write it. I didn't make it up. You can find it on Wikipedia. It's a real thing. And all the presidential directives that came from it. Would these countries like the idea that we show up and we say, hey. We've got a new tetanus vaccine for you, but it happens to also have in it secretly something that will reduce fertility in your women as we did in India, as we did in Peru. In both India and Peru, we also did forced sterilization surgeries. US paid for them. True story. Speaker 1: So the the one vaccine was the DTP vaccine. Is that what it was? Speaker 0: The the one I'm talking about. The the Speaker 1: the The one that had h c g in it? It was just tetanus. But there was a vaccine that was in Bobby Kennedy's book Yeah. Where they were talking about women in Africa, where they were unknowingly given Yeah. This vaccine against That's that's diphtheria, tetanus, and Speaker 0: Well, it was the tetanus part Right. That that they were that they were pitching. And by the way, tetanus is a challenge in those countries more than it is in The United States. But, yeah, they were call they were naming them wellness drugs. Speaker 1: And they had h c g Speaker 0: in it. That's correct. Speaker 1: And that h c g, and they were more administered to women than they were to men. Speaker 0: Oh, of course. And they were five. They would administer administer five of the injections. Speaker 1: And they did it under this the guys were the the the narrative was that women were more vulnerable. So you have to give the vaccination to women. Yeah. And it was preventing them from getting pregnant. Speaker 0: It was preventing them from getting pregnant, and they had World Health Organization, which basically has this as a mission. Man, I wish they would sue me for saying this, but they they have this as a mission, which is population reduction from the beginning. They had worked on that HCG. Speaker 1: There's Gates famously, Speaker 0: of course, Speaker 1: in the speech saying Speaker 0: We can do that with vaccines. Speaker 0: Yeah. By the way, in the Kissinger report, for those of you not seeing this and only hearing it, that was me drinking my pause was me drinking water. I did not have a stroke. In the Kissinger report, they list the strategies and how much funding they'll give to each strategy. One of the strategies is to medicalize birth control, meaning have trusted people in the villages, etcetera. Another one is to pay young men to have a vasectomy. Just outright pay you know, write a check-in villages so they get $60 and they get a nice weekend of buying beer, but they never have kids. But another one of them is injections that reduce that temporarily reduce male fertility. Now here's an interesting thing about that one. It's in the Kissinger report. Injections that temporarily reduce male fertility. The COVID vaccine reduces sperm count in men for three months admitted by Fauci. It's not a secret. But the CDC's response was, yeah, but it's only for three months. And But they were asking us to take one every fucking three months. Well, also the miscarriages. Miscarriages and stillbirths. My point is that it's no it's no surprise that these persistent thoughts that I think good people believe meaning, I think there are good people who believe that population reduction is important. The fact is, of course, that now we are barely at replacement, you know, at replacement value right now in terms of many populations.

What if I told you that a vaccine was secretly laced with a hormone to cause infertility was given to hundreds of thousands of women and girls without their knowledge? What if I told you that a vaccine that was banned in the West for killing girls was pushed on African girls making them 10 times more likely to die? And what if I told you that the man behind all of this funding it, promoting it, has just had his legal immunity stripped in Kenya? Bill Gates through the WHO has funded programs that have been exposed as dangerous, unethical, and deadly. In 02/2013, the World Health Organization launched a neonatal neonatal tetanus campaign in Kenya claiming to protect newborns from deadly infections. But the vaccines contained h c g hormones, a hormone vital in pregnancy chemically bonded to the tetanus vaccine. What were they for?

- Speaker 0 describes a doctrine where an agent or pathogen works best as a binary weapon if followed by mass exposure with vaccines, noting the insistence on gene transfection technologies to create a peptide with a prion-catalyzing epitope and pointing out that lipid nanoparticles are highly labile and inflammatory, constituting a combination of chemical and biological warfare. - Speaker 0 adds that if this was a weapon release, it may be done and now data will reveal its effects, and expresses doubt about how much trust can be placed in normal scientific methods and institutions to relay data to the public, inviting Speaker 1’s thoughts. - Speaker 1 (Stephanie) says the discussion has been an incredible and difficult ride since things began unfolding, with questions about natural versus lab-based origins, vaccine development versus biowarfare, and concerns about funding by China for bioweapons, acknowledging the impossibility of definitively answering many questions. - Speaker 0 agrees that ambiguity is the point and calls it the strength of the weapon. - Speaker 1 asks why someone would inject something to inflict a bioweapon on the entire population, suggesting population control as a possible motivation. - Speaker 0 notes the need to consider literature from top transnational power structures and corporations, asserting that it is not hidden. - Speaker 1 recalls prior concerns about population-control vaccines, referencing reports about vaccines used in Argentina and Africa that allegedly caused infertility, describing an example where a vaccine given to teenage girls could lead to antibody development to a fetus, making infertility less detectable over time. She mentions a memory of a “benign disease” vaccination program in Argentina that led people to suspect infertility, and notes that it could be a stealth method. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the idea that vaccines may have had effects on fertility and reference terms like human chorionic something, with Speaker 1 acknowledging possible occurrences in India as well as Africa and Argentina. - Speaker 0 refers to bioaccumulation seen in reproductive organs and cites pharmacokinetic studies beginning in Japan, noting the vaccine’s presence in the placenta and testes and recalling reports of harmful effects on male reproductive organs. - Speaker 0 mentions Anna Burkhart’s data as dark regarding spike protein expression in reproductive organs found in autopsies, while acknowledging uncertainty about how much weight to attribute to that data, but maintaining that biowarfare cannot be dismissed. - The discussion returns to the mechanism of biowarfare being distinct from a pathogen, describing a scenario where exposure leads to effects years later due to the disease mechanism being induced, rather than immediate pathogen-driven illness.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they have ever used orphans, mentally handicapped individuals, babies of mothers in prison, or individuals under colonial rule to study experimental vaccines. Speaker 1 admits that in the 1960s, it was not uncommon to use mentally handicapped individuals and babies of mothers in prison for such studies. They also confirm conducting experiments on individuals under colonial rule, specifically in the Belgian Congo. The transcript ends without further details about the experiment in the Belgian Congo.

The speakers discuss the use of aborted fetuses in medical research. Speaker 1 confirms that various organs, including the lung, skin, kidney, spleen, and heart, were included in a study. Speaker 0 questions the number of fetuses Speaker 1 has worked with throughout their career, to which Speaker 1 admits not remembering the exact number but acknowledges studying quite a few before using them for vaccine production. When asked about the number of studies involving fetuses, Speaker 1 cannot recall. Speaker 0 then mentions that one objection to vaccination is the use of aborted fetuses.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they have ever used orphans, mentally handicapped individuals, babies of mothers in prison, or individuals under colonial rule to study experimental vaccines. Speaker 1 admits to using orphans, but does not recall using mentally handicapped individuals specifically. They acknowledge that it was not uncommon in the 1960s. Speaker 1 confirms using babies of mothers in prison and individuals under colonial rule, including in the Belgian Congo, where the experiment involved nearly a million people.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about the lack of clinical trial data for the MMR vaccine. Speaker 1 insists that the vaccine was extensively tested before being licensed and that millions of doses have been used. Speaker 0 asks for proof of pre-licensure clinical trials, but Speaker 1 only refers to a book and mentions studies done in the 1960s. Speaker 0 argues that the data provided is not sufficient and questions the absence of a placebo group. Speaker 1 admits uncertainty about the inclusion of control groups but maintains that safety assessments were conducted. Speaker 0 concludes that no randomized placebo-controlled study exists for the MMR vaccine. Speaker 1 agrees to provide additional information after the deposition.

The speaker is asked if they have used orphans or mentally handicapped individuals to study experimental vaccines. They confirm using mentally handicapped children in a study mentioned in an article. The speaker is then asked if they believe it is better to experiment on those less likely to contribute to society, such as children with disabilities. They say they don't remember specifically but it's possible. The speaker is asked if they wrote a letter to the editor on human experimentation ethics, and they confirm writing it. The letter questions whether experiments should be done on fully functioning adults or on children and adults who are not socially potential. The speaker admits to using babies of imprisoned mothers and individuals under colonial rule in vaccine studies, including in the Belgian Congo with almost 1,000,000 people.

Doctors at the Federal Communicable Disease Center acknowledge that the flu vaccine and its recommended dosage are ineffective; in a larger dose, it can be harmful. Nevertheless, the flu vaccine is still recommended for older people and the chronically ill. A senate subcommittee headed by Abraham Rebikoff charged that the federal government wasn’t doing a good enough job of informing the public about ineffective vaccines. Scientists at the Division of Biologic Standards test vaccines for potency and safety before licensing them for public use. However, the division does not determine the effectiveness of the vaccine. That is left to the manufacturers. A case in point is the influenza vaccine. Four scientists in charge of work on the flu vaccine during the 1960s found it to be ineffective, and they refused to give it to their own families. Two were transferred to other work, a third left the division, and over the entire ten-year period, not one word of their unfavorable findings was allowed to be published. But a more serious case involving the relationship between the leaders of the division and their scientists involves the adenovirus vaccine, a vaccine given to thousands of American soldiers to prevent certain cold-like symptoms. When it was shown that the vaccine contained a contaminant which caused cancer in laboratory animals, it was taken off the market. But that was three years after the division’s own scientists had pointed out the danger. Doctor Murray justifies the use of the vaccine by saying it took three years to examine the evidence against it. "It is more important to use the vaccines than to take them off the market and remove the agent." "It is more important to use the vaccines" "than to take them off the market" "and to remove the agent." Thus, for three years, American troops were injected with a cold-preventing vaccine, which was causing cancer in laboratory animals. And some of the division’s scientists who charged they were prevented from publishing results of experiments which show some of the vaccines to be ineffective. "It's the control officer in 1960 who has grave doubts about the potency of influenza vaccine. These doubts were made known to the director of the division and through the proper channels."