reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker opens by reframing Jesus’s presence in today’s terms: “If Jesus were here today, he would be a clinic escort distracting women from the hatred of the protesters or an abortion doula holding women's hands and offering support and love as they end their pregnancies.” They anticipate Jesus would have “a stern word for self righteous legislators who use abortion as a political issue rather than showing compassion for the people seeking abortions.” On this Row Sunday, the speaker aims to share some collected stories, describing them as “the sacred stories of women's lives.” They note that if Jesus were giving a sermon today, he might also have said, “blessed are those who end pregnancies, for they will be known for their loving kindness.” The speaker continues with a personal testimony: they have been pregnant four times, “I have had two abortions, and I have two amazing children.” They describe each reproductive decision—to have children and not to have children—as sacred because “they reflect the moral responsibility of reproductive power that is part of our inheritance as human creatures.” They remind the audience that each person has a reproductive story, and they point out a statistic: “one quarter of American women will have an abortion by the age of 45,” suggesting that some audience members’ reproductive journeys may also include abortion. They reiterate, “Blessed are those who end pregnancies for they will be known for their loving kindness.” The speaker then calls for a reimagining of theological understanding surrounding abortion, arguing it is essential “to addressing the violence that is being done to people across the country in the name of Christianity.” They frame the current climate as marked by “rampant reproductive injustice in our society,” and pose the question: “what does God require of us?” They close with “Amen. Amen.”

In 2005, fertility rates in most US states were high, but in 2021, they have significantly declined. The entire country is experiencing a record low fertility rate, with 43 states recording their lowest rates in over three decades. This has led to a decrease in population growth, and a concerning increase in miscarriages, with an estimated 1 in 4 pregnancies ending in miscarriage. The speaker questions why there is little discussion about this issue. They suggest that the consumption of birth control, environmental factors like chemical abortion pills, exercise rates, diet, and the pharmaceutical industry may all play a role in the declining fertility rates. The speaker expresses alarm and believes that more attention should be given to this issue.

Speaker 0 argues that abortion is murder and frames it as a ritual akin to human sacrifice, claiming civilizations like the Incas and Vikings killed people to appease gods and gain power. They insist abortion isn’t ritualistic, reference an abortion truck outside the Democratic convention, and challenge the idea that abortion is a right, suggesting that abortion is the only right people have. They express empathy for individuals who might face pregnancy decisions, recounting childhood conversations about a 12-year-old farmworker who might be pregnant from rape, and acknowledge sadness about abortion, but insist that now abortion is “the only right you have.” Speaker 1 pushes back by denying that abortion is a ritual and emphasizes that people do not have the right to keep someone from taking a medical injection or consuming unknown products, arguing that the only right claimed is to murder one’s own children. They describe the statement as dark and urge Speaker 0 to reconsider their stance. Speaker 0 responds with a personal perspective as a father, asserting that the most important thing in life is having children and that one’s children are what will matter most. They reject the notion that jobs or material concerns are paramount and criticize the idea of just killing one’s children. They apologize to Brookie for the upset but maintain their view that abortion is grotesque and sad, noting that many people who have abortions are not happy about it. Speaker 1 contends they don’t care about what Speaker 0 says and asserts a lack of interest in further discussion. Speaker 0 elaborates on the idea that the issue is highly ideological and that the reality of abortion is often hidden behind abstractions. They argue that a human being is beheaded with a knife inside a woman, insisting that if beheading didn’t take place, that person could have led a different life, and that it is not for us to kill people simply because they are “in the way.” They warn that if it is permissible to kill children who are in the way, then the elderly or even others could be killed as well, concluding with the assertion that you can’t do that. Speaker 1 reiterates that abortion is a matter of human rights, while Speaker 0 maintains that there is no human right to kill people, insisting that killing people is the enemy of human rights and that the human right is to live. The conversation ends with an unresolved tension between preserving life and recognizing individual rights, framed by extreme positions about abortion and its moral implications.

The speaker discusses concerns about late-term abortions and the alleged practice of keeping babies alive after birth to harvest their organs. They mention the governor of Virginia's comments, but the speaker claims they didn't see it. They suggest that these babies are kept alive for a short period, and their organs are registered and sold for profit. The speaker also mentions that California has passed a law related to this issue, and Virginia, New York, and three other states are trying to pass similar laws.

Abortion is seen as a choice and a right, but it is also considered a tragedy. The focus should be on making it rare and safe, and finding common ground to limit the number of abortions.

The speaker discusses the position of Trump and his running mate on abortion. They state that Trump and his running mate say they believe in exceptions to abortion bans to save the mother's life. The speaker then says, "Let's break that down."

Terri Beatley, author and founder of the Hosea Initiative, argues that America's declining birth rate is not a mere lifestyle trend but may be linked to a long-running population control agenda sold under the language of health care, choice, and women's rights. She discusses her research into the population-control movement in the U.S., highlighting Bernard Nathanson, cofounder of what became the abortion industry, and the organization now known as Planned Parenthood, framed as women’s health care. Beatley recounts her personal journey from buying into Margaret Sanger’s legacy and postponing motherhood to later becoming a homeschooling mother who left a six-figure career. She discusses how the abortion industry affected parental rights in Virginia and led her to interview Nathanson, who she says transitioned from abortion advocate to anti-abortion advocate. Nathanson allegedly performed abortions and taught other doctors how to kill babies, while also cofounding the first pro-abortion political action committee (NARAL). Beatley emphasizes Nathanson’s exposure to real-time ultrasound, his eventual conversion to a pro-life stance by 1979, and his later life as a vocal critic of abortion, including his “eight-point strategy of deception” to promote abortion. Beatley explains that Nathanson’s eight-point propaganda plan was revealed to her in an interview (December 1, 2009) with Nathanson, conducted while he was ill and near death. She outlines the eight points as follows: 1) Frame the argument around choice, presenting it as a woman’s right to choose. 2) Craft catchy slogans, such as “my body, my choice” and “every baby a wanted baby.” 3) Manipulate the media, with Nathanson described as the “Fauci of yesteryear.” 4) Fabricate facts to evoke empathy, including claims of a million illegal abortions annually and 5,000–10,000 women dying from abortion complications, which Beatley asserts are lies. 5) Use polling statistics to mislead public opinion, with Nathanson allegedly fabricating a 60% figure while acknowledging the true figure was far smaller. 6) Repetition of lies through media, a strategy Nathanson reportedly endorsed. 7) Justify decriminalizing abortion by arguing it would not stop abortions, while noting that legalization can increase demand. 8) The Catholic strategy, including a four-part plan to target Catholics: blame bishops for abortion deaths, back Catholic pro-choice politicians, split Catholics into orthodox and “Kennedy-style” pro-choice camps, and promote the “Catholic straddle”—standing pro-life personally but voting pro-choice politically. Beatley stresses the broader consequences she associates with abortion advocacy: a rapid rise in breast cancer linked to birth control practices, evisceration of parental rights across all 50 states, and a cultural shift that allegedly contributed to societal decline. She argues that Nathanson’s legacy—if exposed and understood—could influence hearts and minds toward ending abortion, as opposed to political action alone. Beatley references Nathanson’s “Silent Scream” and his resignation letter on the second anniversary of Roe v. Wade (1975), noting that Nathanson urged Americans to love and stop the killing, and that his conversion took place after viewing ultrasound footage. The conversation shifts to practical actions: Beatley promotes distributing “fact check booklets” produced by Hosea Initiative to educate families, churches, and communities. The booklets cover Nathanson’s history and the eight-point propaganda strategy. Hosea Initiative’s website is given as HoseaFourU.org (Hosea, thenumberfour,you.org). Beatley emphasizes an online Raise Up Your Voice community, seeking passionate pro-life representatives in every county (3,143 counties) to build a national educational movement and “repent for apathy” in voting choices. The interview closes with Beatley urging widespread dissemination of Nathanson’s story and the eight-point strategy, claiming that education can empower people to “connect the dots” and reduce the abortion industry’s influence. She frames the effort as an information war and suggests that President Trump could amplify Nathanson’s message to reach a broad audience.

During the Republican debate, the speaker tweeted about the misleading claim that Democrats support abortion up until birth. They provided statistics showing that abortions past the point of fetal viability are rare, with over 80% happening before 10 weeks of pregnancy and less than 1% happening after 21 weeks. Personal stories from women seeking late-term abortions highlight the difficult decisions they face due to catastrophic fetal abnormalities or risks to their own lives. The speaker emphasized that no one is advocating for late-term abortions or running on a platform of aborting viable babies. They argued that these claims are an attempt to change the parameters of the debate on women's healthcare. Democrats aim to protect a woman's right to make these decisions with her doctor.

The speaker discusses violence among black people, stating that there is no place where black people live and do not engage in violence against each other. They claim that in African countries with black governments and leaders, black people still kill each other. The speaker cites examples of violence in Kenya, including femicide, and notes similar issues in the Caribbean, Haiti, Jamaica, and the United States. They assert that black people will engage in violence in any community. The speaker claims that the only difference in Africa is the lack of guns, with violence instead enacted using sticks, machetes, knives, and bottles. They cite Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Sudan, Somalia, and Nigeria as examples of black-on-black violence.

In 2005, fertility rates in most US states were high, but in 2021, they have significantly declined. The country's fertility rate is now at an all-time low, with 43 states recording their lowest rates in over 30 years. This has led to a decrease in population growth, and approximately 1 in 4 pregnancies end in miscarriages. The speaker questions why there is little discussion about this issue. They suggest exploring the potential links between high birth control consumption, environmental impact of abortion pills, exercise rates, diet, and the pharmaceutical industry's influence on fertility. The speaker expresses concern and emphasizes the need for attention to this matter.

- The speaker notes dated 07/25/2022, reporting on developments related to baby deaths and baby funerals. They reference the UK government website, and specifically Northampton NHS in detail mentioning children's funerals, noting that contracts for this area have appeared that were previously unseen. They point to contractfinderservice.gov.uk and advise looking for “children's and babies' funerals.” They identify several awarded contracts, including one for Hertfordshire, another for Hertfordshire specifically for baby funerals, and contracts awarded for Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS, and Leicester Hospitals NHS. - The speaker mentions that the WNHS is another organization involved for those who do not want to have Mexican arranged funerals, stating that they will do that for you now. - A doctor in Australia, Dr. Luke McClinton, is described as leading the fertility services at the Mater Hospital and as a principal investigator for a series of randomized controlled trials. He is also described as the president of the Australian Institute for Restorative Reproductive Medicine and is labeled as “the top doctor in Australia in this field.” - The speaker asserts that Dr. Luke McClinton was sacked on Friday for not getting the jab and for attempting to release his data on miscarriages post-vaccination. They state that he has until the following Friday to exit his private practice rooms, as he is no longer allowed to practice in public or private settings. - The speaker claims that Dr. McClinton has been investigating miscarriages in couples post-vaccination and states that the “normal miscarriage rate” is between five and perhaps as high as sixteen percent. They then claim that since the introduction of the vaccine, he has found that seventy-four percent of women who are vaccinated are now having miscarriages. - The speaker reiterates the statistic: “Seventy four percent of women are having miscarriages who are vaccinated.” They suggest that this statistic would explain why hospitals allegedly want to deal directly with crematoria, with vans taking multiple babies directly to the crematorium, bypassing funeral directors. The speaker emphasizes that they had previously mentioned these points.

President Trump has stated he will veto a national abortion ban, viewing it as a state's rights issue. The speaker believes that if a baby can survive outside the womb, abortion is not permissible; it constitutes murder at that stage of gestation. The speaker claims the education system has instilled terror in girls and women, pushing the idea that pregnancy is the end of their lives and careers. This fear leads them to believe they must have access to abortion, even in extreme circumstances, and they will vote against any candidate who might restrict it. The speaker asserts that having children brings more joy than anything else and that it is natural to love one's children.

The speaker stands by a statement made, refusing to elaborate further. They defend the senator's remarks, emphasizing her good intentions and dismissing any ill will. The speaker questions the lack of outrage over abortion of African American children, highlighting their efforts towards race relations in the state. They express confusion over the silence on this issue.

The speaker discusses the topic of abortion and argues that it should be considered murder. They emphasize that if there is no life in the fetus, then there is no need for an abortion. However, they believe that the fetus is alive and developing, even if it doesn't have consciousness. They conclude that abortion is objectively the killing of a human being.

One speaker suggests killing unwanted children in foster care. They ask for statistics on the percentage of foster children who are abused, molested, or enslaved. Another speaker says they would be okay with killing babies in foster care and killing children who have been abused. One speaker states that if they don't want to have a baby, they should have the choice not to, because people should still have the choice, and that the other speaker doesn't understand the magnitude of having a child.

Melanin, the pigment that gives color to our skin, is said to be worth more than gold by the pound. This raises questions about why Planned Parenthood clinics are predominantly located in black communities. The speaker suggests that organs containing melanin are more valuable than those of non-melanated individuals. They state that this is not a conspiracy, but rather a fact. Additionally, the speaker mentions that black babies in New York are born larger and older, which could potentially make the abortion industry profitable.

The speaker claims that women who received the vaccine in the first trimester had an 82% miscarriage rate. They state that this is the same miscarriage rate observed in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market analysis.

Are there any states where women face prosecution for having an abortion? No. Are there states that criminalize miscarriage or the care for it? No. Are there states that criminalize removing an ectopic pregnancy? No. Are there states that prohibit life-saving care for the mother? No. Women do not need to be actively dying for doctors to provide care. There’s a lot of rhetoric that may deter women from accessing healthcare. Recently, Vice President Harris claimed women are being arrested for miscarriages. However, there are no known instances of women being arrested for miscarriages or related healthcare. Misleading examples can scare women away from seeking necessary treatment.

If Donald Trump is re-elected, he will go further, and it is important to remind everyone of the high stakes. The speaker is certain that Trump would sign a national abortion ban, outlawing abortion everywhere. This would also force states to report on women's miscarriages and abortions. The speaker expresses disbelief that Project 2025, which contains these plans, was put in writing and distributed.

All of a sudden, we were given this free free thing from the from the Society of America abortion. 78% of your free abortion clinics were placed in black and urban areas for the purpose of something free of charge from a racist society. As a to put it in words, the one pro abortionist, we don't need so many Negroes anymore. There's no more cotton to pick. These feelings about black people, this was one way of doing it as a social benefit, if you will. We're here to help you. Black women and let it be stated, black women never demonstrated, demanded, or even requested the right to an abortion. Been asking for the right to decent housing, the right to education, in fact, the right to health care. And all we've been given for your charge is the right to kill our unborn child.

The speaker discusses concerns about late-term abortions and the alleged practice of keeping babies alive after birth to harvest their organs. They mention the governor of Virginia's comments, but the speaker claims they didn't see it. They suggest that these babies are kept alive for a short period, and their organs are registered for bidding, potentially making large sums of money. The speaker also mentions that California has passed a law related to this, and Virginia, New York, and three other states are trying to pass similar legislation.

The speaker claims that the MMR vaccine contains millions of pieces from cultured cell lines derived from aborted fetuses. They allege the rubella virus is grown on these cell lines. The speaker references a study involving over 70 healthy fetuses aborted specifically for research. According to the speaker, these fetuses were dissected into small pieces, and attempts were made to culture viruses on them to determine the optimal body part for virus growth. The speaker states that some of these abortions occurred past the first trimester.

Are there states where women face prosecution for having an abortion? No. Do any states criminalize miscarriage or the care related to it? No. Are there states that criminalize removing an ectopic pregnancy or prohibit life-saving care for mothers? No. Women do not need to be actively dying for doctors to provide necessary care. There is concerning rhetoric that may deter women from seeking healthcare. Recently, Vice President Harris claimed women are being arrested for miscarriages. However, there is no evidence of any woman being arrested for this or for receiving healthcare related to it. Misleading examples can scare women away from necessary treatment.

If the speaker were a rich, white racist who hated Black people, they would pay young Black boys to make music that destroys Black communities. They would make young Black women dependent on government assistance if there's no father in the home. They would dump drugs into poor Black communities, incentivize them to sell and use them, then imprison them. The speaker would turn Black women against Black men, using Black celebrities, daytime TV, magazines, and the media to help. They would poison Black people's food and make it cheap. Liberal politicians and celebrities would sell truthful-sounding lies, pretending to relate to Black people while living far away from them. To cut them off at the source, the speaker would stop Black people from reproducing by making abortion their "get out of jail free card," ensuring Black women have abortions at a much higher rate than white women, using a slogan like "my body, my choice." This would keep them broke, emotional, childless, and fatherless, and they would still vote for them.

Speaker 0 claimed that white people make up 10% of the world's population, and that in California, the white population decreased by 71% in 73 years, which "kinda sounds like genocide." He questioned why violent crime and murder rates by race are not available from Sacramento. Speaker 1 interrupted, calling the statements racist and inappropriate for public discourse, and ended the call. Speaker 1 stated that racist tropes and stereotypes have no place in civic discourse.