TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

For years, I claimed that none of the 72 vaccines mandated for children underwent proper safety testing in placebo-controlled trials. When I confronted Fauci about this, he couldn't provide the study he claimed existed. After suing him, we received confirmation that no such study was ever conducted. The lack of liability and safety testing saves pharmaceutical companies significant costs, leading to a rush to add unnecessary vaccines to the schedule. This has resulted in a dramatic increase in chronic diseases among American children since 1989, including a rise in neurological disorders and autism, which has skyrocketed from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 34 today.

“Day one of birth.” “they get one on day one of birth, they get another one a month later, they get another six months later.” It’s a “captive audience.” “How many babies are gonna be IV drug abusers or go out and have unprotected sex or get a blood transfusion from somebody who’s infected?” They claim “mom could have had hepatitis B” and that “mom was tested for hepatitis during her pregnancy,” so doctors would have known and could have “either treat it or do something about it or maybe prophylax the baby.” They ask, “Why would pediatricians go along with that? … money.” They warn, “If they’re giving infants treatment that the infant doesn’t need that has potentially harmful consequences and they’re doing it for money, then they’re criminals.” “there’s two hepatitis B vaccines that are in use.” They ask, “What the long term the follow-up study on those two hepatitis B vaccines is? No. Four days for one, five days for the other.” “Where’s the longitudinal study?” “They haven’t done it.” “That’s the vaccine industry.”

A child born in a US hospital receives pharmaceutical interventions, like erythromycin ointment and a hepatitis B vaccine, without informed consent. The ointment prevents chlamydial infections, though mothers are tested for chlamydia. The hepatitis B vaccine is for a sexually transmitted/IV drug user disease, which babies are not exposed to. There is a huge economic incentive to get more vaccines on the schedule because the government pays hundreds of millions of dollars for mandated products. Once approved, these vaccines are paid for everyone, and questioning them is discouraged by trusted institutions. YouTube will censor and demonetize videos that show skepticism of vaccine efficacy or need, even without directly attacking vaccines.

"I don't know what happened in 1990. There was no plague that was killing children that we had tripled the amount of vaccines." "Happened after 1989? The vaccine schedule. Born to 26 more vaccines. Agreed. Are all of them absolutely necessary?" "They wanna make money." "It's twice as many as anywhere else in 30 countries in the Western world. But We give twice as many shots as any of those countries." "Should you educate yourself. We wanna empower parents to educate themselves. Do we need to have the chicken pox? Do we need the hepatitis b shot on the second day of life?" "I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with our public health any longer have our best interest at heart all the time."

ACE has never turned away a single vaccine, even for diseases that are not casually contagious. The hepatitis B vaccine is recommended for babies when they're an hour old, despite the fact that it's transmitted through sexual contact or shared needles. While maternal transmission is possible, every mother is tested, so we know who is vulnerable. The speaker claims the risk to a one-day-old baby is one in seven million, and that financial incentives are a factor. Many of the targeted diseases' vaccines don't prevent transmission, making mandates questionable. Vaccines can cause chronic injuries that last a lifetime.

Day one of birth. They get one on day one, another a month later, another six months later: 'They get one on day one of birth, they get another one a month later, they get another one six months later.' 'That's because it's a captive audience. That's the only reason.' He questions the rationale: 'How many babies are gonna be IV drug abusers or get a blood transfusion from somebody who's infected?' He argues mom 'was tested for hepatitis during her pregnancy,' and that if they had hepatitis B, doctors would know and 'could ... prophylax the baby.' He asks, 'Why would pediatricians go along with that? ... money.' He contends: 'If they're giving infants treatment that the infant doesn't need ... they're criminals.' He notes 'two hepatitis B vaccines' are in use, with 'Four days for one, five days for the other' follow-up, and asks, 'Where's the longitudinal study? ... They haven't done it. ... That's the vaccine industry.'

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify the core topics: trial design and safety monitoring, absence of control group, list of reported adverse events, causality vs association, need for placebo-controlled trials, regulatory and review positions (CDC, IOM), and final stance on vaccine safety. - Preserve key factual claims and phrases (e.g., monitoring duration, lack of control group, listed adverse events, causality requirements). - Emphasize any surprising or unique points (no pre-licensure placebo trial, IOM stance on data, final assertion about safety assumptions). - Exclude filler, repetition, and off-topic chatter; keep a neutral, fact-focused summary. - Translate only if needed; retain precise wording where quoted. - Keep the summary within 378-473 words. Summary: In the discussion about Recombivax HB, the speaker confirms the product and its labeling, noting that Section 6.1 covers pre-licensure clinical trial experience and that safety was monitored after each dose for five days. It is stated that five days is not long enough to detect autoimmune issues or neurological disorders arising after vaccination. The conversation also points out that there is no control group in those trials. Turning to Section 6.2, the nervous system disorders subsection acknowledges reports of Guillain-Barre syndrome and multiple sclerosis, including exacerbation, myelitis including transverse myelitis, seizures and febrile seizures, peripheral neuropathy including Bell’s palsy, muscle weakness, hypothesia, and encephalitis. It is emphasized that these reports are included because they have been reported to authorities as occurring after vaccination, not because they prove the vaccine caused those reactions. To establish causality, a randomized placebo-controlled study would be needed, but none was performed for this hepatitis B vaccine before licensure. Without a control group, evaluating whether a phenomenon in the vaccine group is related is not possible. A speaker comments that the broader issue is that such safety placebo trials were not done before licensure; once injuries are observed, they argue that it’s unethical to conduct placebo trials, and doctors may claim there are no studies showing the injuries are caused by the vaccine, leading to an assumption of safety. The discussion then touches on CDC guidance, with a question about agreeing with the recommendation that babies receive hepatitis B on the first day of life. The responder concedes that hepatitis B doesn’t cause encephalitis “in my opinion.” The IOM review is cited as having determined it “couldn’t find science to support a causal determination one way or another.” In the absence of data, the conclusion cited is that “there’s no proof that causation exists,” which is distinguished from saying it doesn’t cause it. The transcript closes with a provocative remark: “Vaccine safety is not based on science and data. And that is the stalemate we find ourselves in.”

In my practice, we examined every baby and office visit without cherry-picking. We had over 500 babies with no vaccines and 3,700+ with some. Unvaccinated kids showed fewer illnesses and chronic conditions compared to vaccinated ones. The data, displayed in graphs, revealed that more vaccines correlated with worse health outcomes like infections, ADHD, and anemia. This compelling data led to the suspension of my license within 5 days of its release.

And so there are two hepatitis vaccines, and one of them was had a safety study that lasted for four days on a 143 kids, a product that's gonna be given to the seventy six million kids. The risk profile prior to the introduction of the vaccine, the risk of a baby dying from hepatitis B was one in seven million. That means you need to give 7,000,000 hepatitis B vaccines to prevent one death if you're gonna give seven million. So, mister Sikh, and guess before the press labels me wrong, I'm not anti vaccine either either. Think I MMR has been a great vaccine. The DPT has been a great vaccine. Polio has been a great vaccine. Small pot so there are great but it's it's the measured approach that we're after, the transparency you're trying to impal

None of the 72 vaccines for children have been tested against a placebo. The speaker sued HHS in 2016 to find placebo studies for vaccines, but none were found. The safety testing for the polio vaccine was only 48 hours, while the hepatitis b vaccines were tested for 4-5 days. This means that any adverse events occurring after that time period were not considered. Without placebo testing, the risk profile of current vaccines is unknown, and it cannot be determined if vaccines cause more harm than good. The speaker questions the ethics of mandating medical products with unknown risks for children.

For the past 23 years, I've focused on raising awareness about vaccine-related issues, asserting that vaccines are unsafe, ineffective, unnecessary, and harmful. Initially, I believed vaccines contained only dead or weakened viruses and saline. However, after reading a package insert in September 2000, I discovered that children receiving the full vaccination schedule are exposed to nearly 13,000 micrograms of aluminum, 600 micrograms of mercury, and over 200 different chemicals. This revelation shocked me, highlighting that vaccines have never been proven safe. Vaccinating a child means injecting foreign substances into a precious life.

I've always questioned everything, starting in my teenage years. I learned that the tetanus vaccine was said to prevent death from tetanus bacteria entering through wounds, but I discovered no one has actually died that way. During my training in Detroit, I noticed a disparity in who received the vaccine: those on welfare often did not, while private pay patients did. I found a significant difference in fertility rates between the two groups. Research revealed that since 1972, the WHO and NIH have been developing the tetanus vaccine with a pregnancy hormone, potentially causing early pregnancy loss. This has reportedly been used in various countries, and I suspect similar practices may occur in the U.S. These organizations are now behind the COVID vaccine.

He transitioned from environmental law to investigating concerns about pharmaceutical drugs after hearing from women about mercury in vaccines. Initially hesitant to be labeled a vaccine skeptic, he researched the MMR vaccine and its correlation with rising autoimmune issues and autism spectrum disorders, coinciding with an increased vaccine schedule for children. His findings revealed a significant protective system around the vaccine industry, stemming from legislation during the Reagan administration that granted vaccine manufacturers immunity from prosecution for side effects. This led to controversial practices, such as administering Hepatitis B vaccines to newborns, raising concerns about safety and necessity.

After my daughter's death, I delved into vaccine research. Shockingly, since the smallpox vaccine, vaccines have been linked to brain inflammation and chronic autoimmune issues. Placebos in trials can be harmful substances like aluminum or mercury. The science is available, but many choose to ignore it.

Why did the number of vaccines triple after 1989? Are all of them necessary, or is it about profit? The US gives twice as many shots as other Western countries. Parents should educate themselves, and decide what is absolutely necessary. Do we need the chicken pox vaccine, or the hepatitis B shot on the second day of life? We can't assume public health officials always have our best interests at heart. Parents need to make educated decisions and look at the information. Space out vaccines, delay them, and clean out the toxins. Why wouldn't doctors want to learn more about preventing disease? The AAP and medical schools are financed by drug companies, and vaccines are the fastest-growing part of the pharmaceutical industry, a 13 billion dollar business. We're asking them to take a loss for the good of our children, which is a tough sell.

The childhood vaccine schedule is managed by a vaccine advisory group with CDC and American Academy of Pediatrics representation. Changes would come to my desk for review, but this committee is very influential in vaccine policy. Regarding the hepatitis B vaccine, I'm surprised it's given to day-old babies based on limited safety data from a study with only a five-day review period and no placebo group. The FDA likely extrapolated adult data, but I don't think this establishes safety for newborns. I would prefer to see this vaccine given to older children. I disagree with the heavy-handed approach to vaccines, as it increases hesitancy and distrust. Doctors should educate, not badger or threaten, people about vaccines. I'm not a big advocate for one-year-olds getting the hepatitis B vaccine unless the mother is hepatitis B positive and the baby is at high risk.

I've always questioned things, starting in my teens when I wondered about the necessity of the tetanus vaccine every ten years. After discussions with medical professionals, I discovered that the narrative surrounding tetanus deaths was exaggerated. During my training in Detroit, I noticed a disparity in vaccine administration based on socio-economic status, with welfare recipients receiving fewer vaccines. I found alarming information suggesting that since 1972, the World Health Organization and NIH have been developing the tetanus vaccine with components that could lead to infertility in women. This vaccine allegedly contains a pregnancy hormone that can cause the body to attack early pregnancies, particularly in certain regions. I suspect similar practices may be occurring with the COVID vaccine, despite official denials.

A newborn in the US receives pharmaceutical interventions, including erythromycin ointment and the hepatitis B vaccine, despite limited informed consent. The Hep B vaccine targets a sexually transmitted and IV drug user disease, which babies are not exposed to. The rationale for administering the vaccine on the first day of life is questioned, considering that newborns are unlikely to contract Hep B through sex or intravenous needles. When questioned, doctors claim American patients are too stupid to remember to get the vaccine later. Another justification is that a child at daycare could trip over a needle with hepatitis B on it. However, there has never been a documented case of hepatitis B transmission outside of intravenous needles or sex. Therefore, there is no valid reason to administer the vaccine to newborns.

The speaker states they searched for years for a pre-licensing safety trial of the 72 vaccine doses effectively mandated for American children. They claim that every other medication requires a safety trial comparing health outcomes in a placebo group versus a vaccine group before FDA licensing. The speaker assumed this was also done for vaccines. They state they found out that vaccines were exempt from this requirement.

After 1989, the U.S. administers twice as many vaccines as other Western countries. Parents should educate themselves on vaccine choices, questioning the necessity of certain shots like the hepatitis B vaccine at birth. There is concern that public health officials may not always prioritize individuals' best interests. The speaker questions why doctors wouldn't want to learn more about life-saving vaccines, suggesting financial ties between pharmaceutical companies and medical institutions influence vaccine promotion. Advocating for children's well-being may clash with the profit-driven pharmaceutical industry.

A child born in a U.S. hospital is immediately subjected to pharmaceutical interventions, including Erythromycin ointment and a hepatitis B vaccine, often without informed consent. The hepatitis B vaccine targets a sexually transmitted disease and IV drug use, which newborns are not at risk for. It's questioned why infants are vaccinated for conditions they are unlikely to encounter. The rationale provided by some doctors includes the notion that parents might forget or that a child could encounter a contaminated needle, despite no historical evidence supporting such transmission outside of the known routes. Thus, there seems to be no valid reason for administering this vaccine on the first day of life.

In 1990, the number of vaccines increased significantly, raising questions about their necessity. The U.S. administers more vaccines than many Western countries, prompting concerns about profit motives behind vaccine recommendations. Parents are encouraged to educate themselves and make informed decisions about vaccinations, questioning the need for certain shots like chickenpox and hepatitis B at birth. There’s a call to space out and delay vaccinations, as well as to remove toxins from them. The influence of pharmaceutical companies on medical schools and public health organizations is highlighted, suggesting that financial interests may overshadow children's health. The discussion emphasizes the need for transparency and prioritizing children's well-being over corporate profits.

I asked if they could provide a single prelicensing placebo-controlled safety trial for any of the 72 vaccines required for American children. After searching, they claimed the documents were in Bethesda, but I never received them. We then sued the HHS under the Freedom of Information Act. After a year, they acknowledged they could not locate any prelicensing safety trials for the mandated vaccines. These vaccines come with zero liability. I am not anti-vaccine; I believe in honesty and good science. I've spent 30 years advocating to remove mercury from fish, and no one ever labeled me as anti-fish.

Speaker 0: A child born in a hospital in The United States today, within an hours of coming from source into this body, the first thing that happens to them is pharmaceutical intervention without really asking, barely informed consent. That child's eyes are smeared with erythromycin ointment, and they're given a hepatitis B vaccine in their first day of life. And the hep B vaccine is for hepatitis B, which is a sexually transmitted disease, an IV drug user disease, of course, which babies are not gonna be exposed to, and yet every single baby in America is getting the intervention. So from the literally the day we are born, we're— Speaker 1: I these mean, why not test the pregnant mother for those? Speaker 0: They do. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: So They give it to the women who even if they have tested negative— Speaker 1: they give majority. Absolutely. So I don't understand why would you treat a child on his first day of life for illnesses you know for a fact he doesn't have, it isn't gonna get? Speaker 2: So a child's born let's just take the sign. The child's born. Hep B is spread by two routes, sexually transmitted disease or intravenous needles. So my one day old isn't going to be having sex or doing heroin right away. So what's the purpose of getting this on the schedule in the first day of life, the first hours of life? Speaker 0: And if you push, and I welcome anyone to do this with their doctor, you get to two things. You get to the American patients are too stupid to remember, so we need to do it right away. That's literally like what they say. And then my doctor told me that that a child at daycare could trip over a needle that has hepatitis B on it. That's literally what they get to. Speaker 2: That a needle could be on the playground that somebody just did heroin or something, threw the needle down, and it has hepatitis B blood on it. I asked the doctor, has there ever been in human history a case of hepatitis B two being transferred that way? They said no. It's only through intravenous needles and sex. So you actually to to just to steel man this, and, again, welcome anyone to respond, there is not actually a scenario absent of intravenous needles or sex, that a person gets hepatitis b. Speaker 0: There is not a reason for this to be given.

For years, I claimed that none of the 72 vaccines mandated for children underwent safety testing in placebo-controlled trials. Despite Tony Fauci's denials, I challenged him to provide evidence. He admitted he didn't have it on hand and promised to send it, but I never received it. After suing him, his lawyers confirmed there was no such study. The lack of liability and safety testing allows pharmaceutical companies to profit significantly, as the government mandates vaccines for millions of children. This has led to a surge in unnecessary vaccines, contributing to a dramatic rise in chronic diseases among American children since 1989, including conditions like autism, which has increased from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 34.