reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss immigration in Europe, arguing that Poland has done a good job by “allowing nobody in,” and that “most European nations, they're decaying.” They say leaders in Europe are “a little freaked out by” the posture and imply that Europe is destroying its own countries. They suggest that if this continues, Europe will become weak and no longer be strong allies; their ideological shifts will reflect the change in the people entering the countries. Speaker 0 expresses concern about London and Paris, calling the Mayor of London “a disaster” and stating he has “a totally different ideology of what he's supposed to have,” noting he gets elected because many people have come in and vote for him. He adds, “I hate what's happened to London, and I hate what's happened to Paris.” Speaker 2 asks whether Speaker 0 intends a message of tough love to our allies to push reforms or if many allies are simply weak and not worth aligning with. Speaker 0 responds that they are “weak,” and that they want to be politically correct, and “they don't know what to do,” including in trade, which he describes as “a little bit dangerous.” He reiterates that Europe’s political correctness makes them weak. Speaker 0 indicates that there should be people removal for those who entered the country illegally: “think they should get the people out that came into the country illegally.” Speaker 2 then asks about NATO. Speaker 0 brings up Sweden as an example: “Sweden was known as the safest country in Europe, one of the safest countries in the world. Now it's known as a very unsafe well, pretty unsafe country. It's not even believable. It's a whole different country. Sweden.”

The speaker discusses the threat of Islamist terrorism in the UK, highlighting the violence associated with the ideology. They suggest monitoring mosques, licensing imams, protecting Muslim wives under civil law, and banning the burqa in public. The speaker acknowledges the peaceful majority of Muslims but raises concerns about the extremist minority. They offer a memo titled "Why Can't We Talk About Islam" for further discussion.

Speaker: The election of somebody like Mamdani is a game changer. We need somebody like Mamdani to be the mayor of New York. And that is a victory for the ummah. I’m jumping the gun here, but this is one of the narrow mindedness we need to break here. If you don’t understand this, then honestly, you need to rethink through your understanding of civilizational strength. Everybody has a role to play. Muftis have a role to play, and politicians have the role to play. Let everybody be active in their role. This is a strength of our community. And of our greatest strengths, like I said, the political freedoms we have. The guy tried not once, not twice, eight times to shut our project down. I don’t want to go into all the details because of time. He failed miserably at every single level, and the project is still going full steam ahead. Do you understand what I’m saying here? The governor of one of the largest states of the world, Texas, everything’s big in Texas, wanted to stop. And he tried. Multiple ways he tried. Alhamdulillah. That bill did not pass because of multiple reasons of them. We employed our lobbyists money in the lobby. You have to do this reality. And yet here we are still debating, can I vote or not? There’s voting. We are in one galaxy and the world is a different galaxy. Literally, it’s just disconnected from reality. If we did not get involved, our masjid would have been shut down. Forget our project. Right? These are some of the strengths very quickly. Weaknesses. We have multiple weaknesses. Our biggest weakness is our percentage in this country. We are very disadvantaged. By the way, this is only in this country because across the Western world percentages are rising to the point of it terrifying them. Sweden, Sweden, 10% Muslim. Oslo, Norway, 10% Muslim. Oslo, of all places. Vienna. The Ottoman Turks tried two hundred years. They couldn’t do anything. Vienna is 10% Muslim. MashaAllah Subhana rabbika Allah. 10% Muslim. England, London, it is estimated 20%. I was in Australia a year and a half ago. Australia, Sydney, Sydney. There are districts the size of maybe half of Austin that are 60% Muslim. Lakimba, go look it up. Lakimba in Sydney.

The speaker contrasts European political responses to immigration and crime with American policies, arguing that European left-wing politicians ignore urgent problems. They claim: - In Spain, “they just legalized residents of half a million illegal aliens.” - In France, “they throw grenades into hair salons in a broad daylight.” - In Germany, “not a single day goes by without someone being murdered with a knife.” - In Sweden, “you have bomb attack every other day.” The speaker asserts that these are real problems for the European left-wing politicians, yet contends that those politicians do not care. The immediate target is a European debate about the rule of law in the United States and deportation policies: the speaker says, “You are seriously discussing here the rule of law in United States and criticizing American government for deporting illegal aliens, for deporting criminals out of their territory in the same time when Western European cities are gradually turning into a war zone.” A call is made to apply the same approach in Europe: “We should do exactly the same. We should deport them from Europe and not legalize their stay.” The speaker urges listening to them and not to “what you are proposing to all of us,” asserting that “Everybody can see, no, you are enemies of Europe. You hate Europe.” The rhetoric culminates in a warning: “You hate our nations, and you want to destroy the future for our children. We should stop you. We should defeat you politically if we want to survive. Otherwise, it will be the end of Europe.”

An individual claims there are more extremists in the UK than in the Middle East, stating that some things Islamists say in UK mosques they wouldn't say in Afghanistan. They attribute this to the presence of the Muslim Brotherhood and radical Islamists in areas like Small Heath and Birmingham, who voice support for Hamas, which they identify as the armed forces of the Muslim Brotherhood. They note the Muslim Brotherhood is banned in the UAE but not in the UK, and argue it should be banned. They claim the group uses freedom of speech to censor opposition and uses the term "Islamophobia" to stifle criticism. They highlight that Islamic Relief is registered as a charity in the UK but banned in Saudi Arabia and the UAE due to investigations allegedly showing it sends money to terrorist groups in the Middle East.

Every house produces garbage, and we dispose of it to prevent illness and disease. Similarly, society has its own garbage in the form of extremist ideologies that promote discrimination and violence. These ideologies thrive in Western countries where they can operate freely and have support. Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Oman, and Kuwait are not facing a crisis, but the West is. The West imported these extremist ideologies for cheap labor, but they don't contribute to society and instead rely on welfare. Poland, on the other hand, has effectively dealt with Islamic extremism by cracking down on it. The West's problem lies in both the strengthening of extremists and its own weakness.

Speaker 0 says that Al-Qaeda and ISIS are “working for the Western countries” that claim to fear and loathe them, citing that French, Belgian, British, and German people suffered at the hands of ISIS and Al-Qaeda. Speaker 0 claims those governments covertly assisted ISIS and Al-Qaeda to power, including in Syria, and then recognized and welcomed the ISIS-al-Qaeda leadership in Syria. Speaker 0 references the German government welcoming “the ISIS al-Qaeda chief,” “al-Julani,” and calling him “Mr. President,” and also mentions having seen him holding up severed heads. Speaker 0 argues that Western governments’ “ambivalence” toward ISIS and Al-Qaeda is “well charted.” Speaker 0 then makes an allegation, blaming Macron, stating: “Macron were behind the ISIS-Al Qaeda super growth,” which Speaker 0 says has enabled them to infiltrate thousands of soldiers in an attempt to overthrow the government of Mali.

The speaker states that Europe is currently undergoing an invasion consisting of the mass Islamization of the continent, which has been ongoing for 50 to 60 years. They claim this is a global political agenda by powerful entities to destroy Europe culturally and religiously, ultimately aiming to destroy Christianity with the help of a massive Islamic population. A sociologist calculated that in 30 to 40 years, the majority of Europe's population will be Islamic if the current trend continues. This is attributed to European people having few children compared to Muslim families, who have five to ten children.

Macron believes the Islamic world is in crisis due to issues like Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, and the Taliban. However, he acknowledges that Islam is generally successful and growing rapidly. He argues that Muslim countries like Dubai, Abu Dhabi, UAE, Bahrain, Oman, and Kuwait are not in crisis, but certain places are. Macron blames the West for importing Islamist extremists for cheap labor, who instead want welfare and to marry French women. He contrasts this with Poland, which has not experienced any terrorist attacks and suggests that both the extremists becoming stronger and the West becoming weaker are contributing factors.

The speaker argues that the burden of proof lies on those claiming Islam is a religion of peace, stating actions by Muslims globally cause fear of Islam, not critics. Examples cited include 9/11, bombings, and various forms of oppression in Islamic states like Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Yemen. The speaker questions the notion that these are extreme fringes, comparing it to calling the Vatican the extreme fringe of Catholicism. They highlight issues like unequal rights for women, child marriage, and executions for blasphemy and apostasy. The speaker states they are under no obligation to respect Islam and sees brutality and violence in countries where Islam dictates. While acknowledging peaceful Muslims exist, the speaker contends that Islam itself is not peaceful, citing literal interpretations of the Quran, such as the command to beat women. The speaker concludes that the evidence shows Islam is not a religion of peace.

To ensure social cohesion, newcomers to Australia should adhere to Australian norms or not be allowed to live there. Multiculturalism has failed because it allows immigrants to assimilate on their own terms, leading to isolated communities and empowering radical Islam. Radical Islam is an international ideology aiming to establish Sharia law and a caliphate worldwide. Islamist movements, now banned in many original Islamic countries, have migrated to Western societies, using freedoms of religion and speech to advance their goals. These groups have established infrastructure, including mosques and schools, to Islamize communities. To counter this, the speaker suggests emphasizing national unity, dismantling Islamist infrastructure, and deporting radical imams. Muslim citizens should choose allegiance to Australia or return to their country of origin.

Muslims living with various religious groups, including other Muslims, is a problem. This results in unhappiness in Gaza, Egypt, Libya, Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Pakistan, Syria, Lebanon, Nigeria, Kenya, Sudan, Morocco, and Afghanistan. Muslims are happy in Australia, Belgium, France, Holland, Italy, Germany, Spain, Sweden, Denmark, the USA, Canada, Norway, India, and England due to welfare benefits. They are happy in almost every non-Islamic country. However, they do not blame Islam, their leadership, or themselves for their unhappiness. Instead, they blame the countries where they are happy and want to change them to be like the countries they left.

In this video, the speaker expresses concern about the rise of radical extremists and terrorists in Europe. They attribute this to a lack of decisive action, political correctness, and a misguided belief that Europeans understand the Middle East, Islam, and other cultures better than they actually do. The speaker deems this perspective as pure ignorance.

The speaker believes Europe is falling, and the United Kingdom is on the brink. The Prime Minister of Sweden stated his government has lost control of the monopoly of violence. The speaker believes Germany and France are in similar situations, and fears these countries will fall like dominoes. This has occurred through settlement and infiltration of institutions, including political parties. The speaker's nightmare is that the West starts to fall apart, and the current Labour government has done more to accommodate this in the last eight months than anything else.

The speaker claims that Europe is experiencing an invasion, not a refugee crisis, but a mass Islamization that has been ongoing for 50-60 years. They assert that a global political agenda by the world's powerful aims to destroy Europe culturally and religiously, specifically to destroy Christianity with the help of a massive Islamic population. The speaker references a sociologist's calculation that in 30-40 years, Muslims will be the majority in Europe because European people have few children while Muslims have many.

Europe's lack of decisive action and obsession with political correctness will lead to an increase in radical extremists and terrorists. Their ignorance in thinking they understand the Middle East, Islam, and other cultures better than we do is a dangerous mistake.

Speaker 0 asks how to weed out Muslims in a country that despises you and means you harm without vilifying or persecuting those who are fine and part of the social fabric. Speaker 1 responds by highlighting that Arab states have taken a strong stance against the Muslim Brotherhood and asks why the West hasn’t. The Muslim Brotherhood has been banned in Egypt and in many Gulf states (not Qatar), and there is a reason: they know how dangerous this organization is, that it doesn’t represent peace-loving Muslims who simply want to practice their religion and not impose a perverted version of jihad. Speaker 1 asserts that the Muslim Brotherhood is not pro-Muslim; it is an organization providing cover for terrorism that disproportionately impacts Muslims, especially in the Arab world. He emphasizes that the biggest victims of terrorism are the people of the Middle East, the majority of whom are Muslims, and urges people to educate themselves about what’s really happening on this front before it’s too late. Speaker 0 then asks why Europe is failing and has massively open borders, taking people from regimes where terrorism is life-threatening. Speaker 1 answers with a single word: subversion. He claims this is most evident in the Israel-Palestinian conflict, stating that the way the war and the conflict are presented in international media is not an accurate reflection of what’s happening on the ground. He believes many Palestinians would share that sentiment. He contends that what’s happening in Gaza is not how it’s reported, because narratives are shaped to present a certain story, a process he attributes to Al Jazeera. He questions who runs Al Jazeera and asserts it is state-run by Qatar, and says they have been a chief sponsor of a “laundered ideology” presenting Palestinian victimhood even if some stories are fabricated. He claims Al Jazeera has falsified stories during the Gaza war. Speaker 1 concludes that when people push back against Islamism, they’re accused of conspiracy or exaggeration, but the speaker argues that there is a conspiracy to undermine the West. He acknowledges that it may seem crazy to say so, but asserts that such a conspiracy is exactly what is happening. He identifies this as the fundamental ideology of Qatar, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Islamic Republic of Iran on the Shia side, and says this is something that must be spoken out against to educate the general public.

The speaker highlights that extremist groups like the IRGC and Muslim Brotherhood operate outside of Muslim countries, such as in London, France, Washington DC, Australia, and Canada. They argue that while there are problems like Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, and Taliban, Islam as a whole is successful and growing. The speaker criticizes Western countries for importing Islamist extremists for cheap labor, who then rely on welfare instead of working. They contrast this with Poland's strict policies against Islamic extremism and the absence of terrorist attacks there. The speaker also mentions how some individuals in France support the Iranian regime and oppose sanctions in Congress.

The speakers discuss what they describe as a global rise in Islamist-linked threats and the impact of migration on security in Western countries. They begin by asserting that France’s government can no longer keep its own people safe from “potential radical Islamic terrorists that they have welcomed into their country,” and claim that France has allowed so many Middle East and North African migrants that crowds can no longer be assembled. They extend the concern to other Western nations, stating that the threat is now widespread, including in Germany, where they say many people are afraid to attend famous Christmas markets because they have become highly dangerous targets for radical Islamists. Speaker 1 provides details: since 2014, seven European Christmas markets have been attacked—three in France and four in Germany. Authorities arrested five men suspected of planning attack number eight in Germany last week; among them is described as a Muslim cleric from a German mosque who allegedly urged his followers to kill as many people as possible. The report notes that an attack in Poland on a Christmas market was foiled as well. The German case is characterized as a migrant who came from Egypt, moved to Germany, and, according to the speakers, worked at a mosque in a country they describe as tolerantly allowing him to operate there. They claim this individual began indoctrinating other Muslims to murder Christians. They describe attending a German Christmas market at this point as akin to playing Russian roulette, expressing fear that an asylum seeker living on tax dollars could drive a car into a market and kill many people. The speakers reference Australia, stating that 16 people were murdered on a beach “this past Sunday,” and claim that there is a heightened threat as their government imported tens of thousands of migrants from Muslim-majority countries, with the Muslim population purportedly doubling in a decade. They criticize Australia’s Labour Party as “left-wing,” asserting it has “the strictest gun laws in the world” yet intends to add more, while instructing viewers to light a candle as a symbolic response. They describe the current government as being led by people who are detached from reality and who prioritize political orthodoxies over people’s lives, claiming that the media feeds the same narratives and spin. Speaker 2 endorses a symbolic action: “Light a candle. Put it in their front window tonight at 06:47PM to show that light will indeed defeat darkness.” They state that a national cabinet meeting will consider a proposal to empower agencies to examine what can be done in this area. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes a narrative of increasing Islamist terrorism linked to migrant populations in Europe and Australia, argues for stronger security measures and altered political responses, and frames mainstream reporting as insufficient.

The speaker argues the burden of proof lies on those claiming Islam is a religion of peace, stating actions in the "real world" contradict this. They cite 9/11, bombings in London and Madrid, and violence in various countries as examples of what "whips up fears of Islam," not critics. They highlight practices in Saudi Arabia, like restrictions on women, and punishments for blasphemy and apostasy, arguing it's not an "extreme fringe" but central to Islam. They question why Islam deserves respect, pointing to brutality and violence in Islamic states, particularly regarding women's treatment. While acknowledging peaceful Muslims exist, the speaker contends "Islam itself is not peaceful," citing Quranic verses interpreted to justify violence and oppression. They conclude that the evidence shows Islam is not a religion of peace.

Macron, the president of France, believes the Islamic world is in crisis due to problems like Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, and the Taliban. However, Islam as a whole is successful and growing rapidly, with countries like Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Kuwait doing well. The speaker argues that the crisis lies within the West, as they imported Islamist extremists for cheap labor, who now seek welfare and French spouses instead of working. In contrast, Poland has effectively dealt with Islamic extremism by cracking down on it. The speaker believes that both the extremists becoming stronger and the West becoming weaker contribute to the problem.

Every house produces garbage, which is taken away by the government to prevent illness and disease. Similarly, society has its own garbage in the form of murderers, criminals, and harmful ideologies. Extremist groups like the IRGC and Muslim Brotherhood operate in Western countries, where they have bank accounts and register charities. The Islamic world is not in crisis overall, but there are problems with groups like Boko Haram and Al Qaeda. The West imported these extremists for cheap labor, but they don't want to work and instead seek welfare. Poland has successfully dealt with Islamic extremism, unlike France, which allows it to flourish. The question is whether the extremists have become stronger or the West has become weaker, and the answer is both.

Muslims living with various religious groups face problems, including Muslims living with Muslims, which is a very big problem. This results in unhappiness in Gaza, Egypt, Libya, Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Pakistan, Syria, Lebanon, Nigeria, Kenya, Sudan, Morocco, and Afghanistan. Muslims are happy in Australia, Belgium, France, Holland, Italy, Germany, Spain, Sweden, Denmark, The USA, Canada, Norway, India and England due to welfare benefits. They are happy in almost every country that is not Islamic. They do not blame Islam, their leadership, or themselves. Instead, they blame the countries they are happy in and want to change these countries to be like the countries they came from, where they were unhappy.

Europe is the cradle of Western civilization, and the cultural and religious bonds between it and the U.S. will last beyond political disagreements. However, Europe is at risk of civilizational suicide. Many European countries are unable or unwilling to control their borders, but they are starting to push back, which is good. They are also starting to limit the free speech of their own citizens, even as those citizens protest against border issues. Europe needs to respect its own people and sovereignty, something America can't do for them. If a country like Germany takes in millions of immigrants who are culturally incompatible, Germany will have killed itself. The speaker loves Germany and wants it to thrive.

The speaker points out that extremist groups like the IRGC and Muslim Brotherhood operate in Western countries, while Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia and UAE restrict their activities. They mention that Islam is generally successful and growing, with countries like Dubai and Abu Dhabi thriving. However, they argue that Western countries have imported Islamist extremists for cheap labor, leading to problems. They contrast this with Poland's strict policies and lack of terrorist attacks. The speaker believes that both the extremists becoming stronger and the West becoming weaker contribute to the crisis.