reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims to have read detailed plans of an upcoming military operation organized by CENTCOM, including the timing of the attack, specific targets (including human targets), weapons systems, and weather reports. This information was allegedly shared on an unclassified commercial messaging app with civilian leaders, including the Secretary of the Treasury. The speaker questions why such individuals would need to know the precise attack sequence. The speaker expresses concern about the unserious nature of sharing such sensitive information in this manner and suggests the Secretary of Defense is deflecting from their participation in the conversation. The speaker notes that the Houthis were not yet aware of the plan when the speaker read it.

Speaker introduces Sarah Adams as 'TPA Sarah' and states everything is opinion, not fact. He claims, "I think she is working for in a foreign intelligence agency or The United States intelligence agency," that she is a "plant" and a "mole." He predicts a forthcoming "false flag terrorist attack" and says people like her are propagating propaganda. He recounts Brayton Howell’s message: "these are not false flag attacks. IKEADA is a real threat," with "the links" being "actual reports" to distribute to local law enforcement and hospitals, and that Adams is "his source." He cites a Sean Ryan clip alleging Al Qaeda knows the Building 7 conspiracy and discusses using conspiracies to blame the government. He condemns the claims, mocks Adams, and asserts "Israel" behind various attacks, saying "we're not buying" the documents, while mentioning "sleeper cells" and printable PDFs for hospitals.

An email received on December 31st detailed concerns about advanced drone technology, specifically gravitic propulsion systems, allegedly used by China and the U.S. The sender claimed these drones pose a significant national security threat, capable of carrying large payloads and evading detection. He mentioned being followed by authorities and expressed fears of an abduction attempt related to his knowledge of war crimes during airstrikes in Afghanistan in 2019, which he claimed were covered up by various U.S. agencies. He provided his LinkedIn profile for verification, indicating a military background and access to classified information. The recipient noted the difficulty in verifying the claims and expressed reluctance to discuss them publicly without evidence. The sender requested media contacts to elevate the issue.

- Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the possibility that a friend was murdered and suggest that both victims died suddenly from fast-moving cancer, a method they say the agency uses overseas to eliminate people. Speaker 1 admits he cannot prove this but notes the sudden deaths. - The conversation asserts that the US government has technology to infect people with fast-moving cancer and to perform cognitive and directed-energy warfare. Speaker 0 states the government has the technology to infect with fast-moving cancer and to do so absolutely. - In 1997, Speaker 1 describes a hearing on asymmetric threats where he chaired the research committee and focused on four threats: drones, cyberattacks, electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and cognitive warfare. He asserts that cognitive warfare is now being labeled by some as Havana syndrome and that directed-energy weapons are the underlying technology. - Speaker 2 recounts a recent homeland security hearing about foreign adversaries using direct weapons against US citizens, enabling incapacitation. He emphasizes the chilling nature of the briefing and criticizes current domestic leadership as foolish, corrupt, incompetent, and wicked. - Speaker 3 notes that up to 40% of the Air Force equipment budget in the 1990s was classified, making much of it “black.” He emphasizes that military and security research often precedes civilian medical science, and that servicemen were used in experiments without fully informed consent, referencing NK Ultra-era disclosures of thousands of service members used as subjects. - Speaker 4 discusses MKUltra, describing a Canadian experiment involving psychic driving with massive LSD doses, eye-tracking, and memory loss, funded by MKUltra and affecting civilians. He mentions Project Midnight Climax, where Johns were observed in brothels while subjected to LSD, and notes similar experiments by the British Royal Air Force and Army. The results of Midnight Climax are unknown, with no published after-action reports. - Speaker 3 adds that Secretary of Energy O’Leary stated under Clinton that over a half a million Americans had been used in human experiments over four decades without informed consent, including mind control, with no accountability. He argues that mind-control technology has advanced, and questions who should govern its use, given the lack of legal frameworks. - The discussion covers mind-effects research and the lack of treaties governing such technologies. They reference a European Parliament security and disarmament resolution (1999) addressing mind-effects and mind-control technology, and Russian Duma resolutions (2002) seeking similar safeguards. Zabigniew Brzezinski’s Between Two Ages is cited regarding electronically stroking the ionosphere to influence behavior over geographic areas, connecting it to HARP and other electromagnetic carriers capable of mass or individual influence. - Speaker 6 explains historical demonstrations of electronic mind control, starting with Jose Delgado’s remote manipulation of a charging bull using radio energy and electrodes, and notes later work showing noninvasive techniques to influence behavior using low-power magnetic fields. Speaker 7 reiterates Delgado’s animal studies and the potential for noninvasive methods to affect emotions and memory, with broader implications for humans. - Speaker 3 discusses the progression of research funded by DARPA and others toward higher-resolution control of brain activity, enabling controlled effects that override senses and create synthetic memories, raising questions about future justice and evidence. They describe European Parliament and NATO/US military interest in mind-control technologies and the absence of robust legal protections. - Speaker 9 presents advances in AI-enabled brain-reading and memory-altering devices, including mind-reading and emotion decoding, while Speaker 10 and Speaker 12 discuss privacy concerns, brain-data privacy laws (Colorado’s law adding brain data to privacy protections), and the availability of consumer devices that decode brainwaves. They warn that brain data can be misused by insurers, law enforcement, advertisers, and governments, with private companies often sharing data without clear disclosure. - The segment concludes with a note that devices can infer attention and thoughts, and that DARPA’s N3D program aims for noninvasive neuromodulation with implantable electrodes read/write capabilities. It references 1980s–1990s discussions of RF energy as a potential nonlethal mind-control technology, and a 1993 Johns Hopkins conference listing low-frequency weapons as attractive options.

Iranian-made surface-to-air missiles have reportedly crossed the U.S. border, confirmed by two independent sources—one from south of the border and one from within the U.S. government. This information was relayed to the Secret Service due to potential threats to Trump's campaign. Although the missiles have not been recovered, couriers have been apprehended, and a safe house linked to the operation was identified. Concerns are rising about advanced invisible bombs that can evade detection, posing a significant threat to public safety. There are reports of sleeper cells and a lack of preparedness among local law enforcement. Communities must advocate for better security measures, especially in schools, and hold government officials accountable to address these threats seriously. It's crucial to raise awareness and take action before potential tragedies occur.

Sam Shumate discusses a recent surge of interest in a warning from Sarah Adams about potential terrorism in 2025. He reveals that an email from a Green Beret, Matthew Livelsberger, surfaced before a bombing incident at Trump Hotel in Las Vegas. The email contained alarming claims about drone capabilities and war crimes linked to U.S. military operations in Afghanistan. Shumate and his guest, a retired intelligence officer, emphasize the importance of verifying the information but acknowledge its serious implications. They also discuss the possibility that Livelsberger may still be alive, suggesting he intended to send a message rather than cause mass casualties. The conversation highlights concerns about national security and the need for accountability regarding military actions and potential threats. The discussion ends with a call to action for the public to engage with local communities and hold government officials accountable for security measures.

Sam Shumate discusses a recent surge in interest surrounding Sarah Adams' warnings about terrorism in 2025. He reveals that he received a manifesto from a Green Beret, Matthew Livelsberger, prior to a bombing at Trump Hotel in Las Vegas. The manifesto contained alarming claims about drone capabilities and alleged war crimes in Afghanistan. Despite the gravity of the information, the authenticity remains unverified. Shumate highlights the importance of accountability in the military and the need for transparency regarding potential threats. They also discuss the implications of the manifesto and the possibility that Livelsberger may still be alive, suggesting he intended to send a message rather than cause mass casualties. The conversation emphasizes the urgency for communities to enhance security measures and for citizens to hold their government accountable.

Speaker introduces Sarah Adams as 'TPA Sarah' and states these are alleged opinions. He claims she is 'working for' or 'a plant... a mole' in a foreign or U.S. intelligence agency, and predicts 'we're gonna see a false flag terrorist attack.' He cites Brayton Howell: 'these are not false flag attacks. IKEADA is a real threat. They have sleeper cells in the country,' adding that 'the links are actual reports that need to be distributed to local law enforcement and hospitals.' He references Sean Ryan: 'Al Qaeda actually knows about the Building 7 narrative' and that 'there was nothing suspect about Building 7 collapse.' He argues Israel is behind attacks, saying 'Israel attacked us at the USS Liberty' and 'the only person who's carrying out a terrorist attack on USA soil is gonna be fucking Israel.' He ends with 'Pipe the fuck down, Sarah.'

An email received on December 31st detailed concerns about advanced drone technology, specifically gravitic propulsion systems, allegedly used by China and the U.S. The sender claimed these drones pose a significant national security threat due to their stealth and payload capabilities. He expressed fear of being followed by authorities and mentioned having a vehicle-borne improvised explosive device (VBIED). The email also referenced war crimes related to airstrikes in Afghanistan, which he claimed were covered up by various U.S. agencies. He requested that this information be elevated to the media to prevent a potential global conflict. The sender provided his LinkedIn profile for verification, but the recipient struggled to validate the claims, particularly regarding the gravitic propulsion system, which he viewed as a term more suited to science fiction.

America is reeling from recent attacks in New Orleans and Las Vegas, with connections emerging to Fort Bragg. The Las Vegas suspect, Matthew Livelsberger, linked to a military reality show, left behind manifesto letters in a burning Cybertruck, claiming his actions were a wake-up call, not terrorism. He warned about drones using gravitic propulsion systems, a technology only possessed by China and the U.S. Livelsberger's email detailed threats to national security and alleged war crimes during military operations. Questions remain about the authenticity of his emails and the circumstances surrounding the attack, as authorities continue their investigation. Vigilance is urged as more information develops. Stay informed and safe.

Speaker 0 summarizes claims from a Sean Ryan podcast by Sarah Adams, who allegedly said that questioning Building 7 or discussing its collapse means you’re helping Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda supposedly finds Building 7 conspiracy topics fascinating and has discussed ruses to blame the government, and Sarah Adams is described as a Mossad asset. The discussion outlines three plotting components: (1) a large aviation plot with suicide bombers aiming to kill about 4,000; (2) a Washington, DC ground assault to cripple the federal government’s response; (3) ISIS-led urban attacks on churches, supermarkets, and hospitals with five-to-ten person teams, at multiple locations, possibly impersonating law enforcement. There’s a claim Israel would carry out a false flag attack at hospitals dressed as police. A prior intelligence source calls the woman a fraud, alleging NRF Pakistanis fabricate intel. Everything’s said in this video is allegedly. I’m a parody account.

Speaker introduces Sarah Adams (TPA Sarah) and states the video presents opinion: "These are just my opinions and what I personally think." They claim, "I think she is working for in a foreign intelligence agency or The United States intelligence agency... She's a mole." They warn of a forthcoming false flag terrorist attack and say the propaganda from people like her lays the groundwork for it. Brayton Howell messages that "these are not false flag attacks. IKEADA is a real threat. They have sleeper cells in the country." He links "actual reports that need to be distributed to local law enforcement and hospitals," citing Sarah Adams as his source. They reference a Sean Ryan clip where she allegedly argued that "Al Qaeda knows about the Building 7 narrative." The host doubts the claims, questions sleeper cells' plausibility, and asserts the only people who would attack USA soil would be Israel. No facts here; just my alleged opinion.

Gary Melton (Gary) and Mitch have a lengthy, meandering exchange that centers on veterans’ histories, alleged government manipulation, personal trauma, and the pursuit of truth around high-profile political cases. The core thread is an effort to verify Mitch’s claims about his SF background and to explore broader claims about political interference, media narratives, and potential conspiracies. Key points and exchanges: - Identity, background, and verification: - Gary identifies himself as a former SF soldier seeking to verify Mitch’s SF history after seeing his Candace Owens interview. - Mitch provides his SF timeline: he was in group from February/March 1993 until November 1996; MOS 18 Charlie (medic). He mentions attending the 300F1 course and a severe on-duty accident at Guadalupe River, involving a 60-foot fall that caused multiple injuries (spine, feet, knee, lumbar, dislocations, torn labrum, etc.). - Mitch describes his treatment (brace, three-week leave, then recycled into the next class and internship at Brookhaven Army Medical Center Burn Ward). He mentions ODA +1 63166/ +1 63/ +1 66 and places himself on +183 and +185 in the old numbering system; later, he notes the transition to the newer numeric system circa 2002-2006. - Gary asks for Mitch’s DD214 to verify the story; Mitch agrees and offers to share it. He references being in “Lake Baja” and knowing Nate (Nate Chapman), whom he spoke with the day before. - Personal stakes, trauma, and family: - Mitch explains a long, difficult divorce and custody battle that spanned many years. He says he was a stay-at-home dad for his son, who is now 13, and describes persistent, aggressive accusations against him (PTSD, abuse, murder) by courts and media figures. - He recounts a prior incident involving a coworker or classmate, Jimmy Walker, and notes that Walker later claimed PTSD and discrimination in SF contexts. Mitch frames this as part of broader patterns of how SF status can be weaponized in custody and legal battles. - Mitch and Gary discuss how the SF environment can foster suspicion, paranoia, and intra-community politics (e.g., clashes with SF Brothers, admin actions, and the difficulty of maintaining contact with peers after leaving the teams). - Candace Owens, TPUSA, and broader conspiratorial discussions: - The callers discuss Candace Owens’ involvement, the TPUSA circle, and the believability of various claims. Mitch says he has wanted to vet the claims through Candace and Joe Kent, and he’s offered to supply documents to verify stories. He notes that Candace has reportedly pulled threads about various shooters and narratives and that this has caused friction with TPUSA. - Mitch argues that Candace might be exploited by political or foreign adversaries and that her narratives sometimes lack corroborating evidence, distracting from “the truth.” He insists on corroborating Mitch’s own story with documents (DD214, other records) before airing anything publicly. - Gary responds with skepticism about online personas but agrees to vet Mitch’s materials, emphasizing integrity and a desire to verify truth. Both acknowledge the risk of backend manipulation, bot attacks, and the use of media figures to push narratives. - Ballistics and the Charlie Kirk incident: - A substantial portion of the discussion turns to ballistics surrounding Tyler Robinson and the Charlie Kirk incident. Mitch (the ballistics expert) explains that many variables affect ballistic outcomes (ammo type, grain, bullet construction, handloads vs. factory ammo, barrel condition, yaw, stabilization). He argues that the 30-06 round’s behavior can be highly variable and that an “atypical” (non-normative) wound could occur for many reasons. - He compares Martin Luther King’s assassination (65-yard shot, 30-06, open casket) to Charlie Kirk’s wound, noting similarities in the trajectory and lack of an exit wound in some high-profile cases. He cites Chuck Ritter (Green Beret) who was shot multiple times with 7.62x54R and survived, and uses these examples to illustrate the complexity of interpreting ballistic evidence. - Mitch asserts that multiple plausible explanations exist for Kirk’s wounds and stresses that the exact ammunition type, projectile, and ballistic conditions are unknown at present. He emphasizes that investigators possess DNA and surveillance records (DNA on the firearm, trigger, cartridge, towel used by Tyler Robinson) and text messages; he notes that Mitch is not claiming to know the entire truth but wants to see corroborating evidence. - The two discuss the possibility of government involvement or manipulation, while acknowledging that ballistics alone cannot prove a broader conspiracy. They note the challenges of obtaining complete ballistic data before trials, and they express openness to future verification once more information becomes available (e.g., during trial proceedings). - Custody, investigations, and accountability: - Mitch recounts the broader pattern of SF members being targeted by legal systems when in contentious custody situations, with accusations and judgments influenced by SF status. He cites examples of coercion, character assassination, and the weaponization of families in court battles. - They discuss how the FBI and other agencies have handled high-profile cases, noting distrust in narratives presented by authorities and media. They acknowledge that public transparency is essential, even as prosecutions proceed. - Platform, vetting, and next steps: - The two plan to continue the vetting process: Mitch will provide DD214 and related documents to Gary, who promises to verify and not disclose sensitive information without Mitch’s consent. They discuss sending further documents via email or text (Gary’s Paramount Tactical contact). - Mitch expresses a desire to appear on Gary’s show and to connect with Nate (Nate Chapman) for collaborative vetting. Gary commits to facilitating, offering to act as an advocate if Mitch’s story is verified and to help set up communications with Nate and Candace as appropriate. - The conversation closes with both agreeing on the importance of truth, corroboration, and accountability. They acknowledge the risk and the emotional toll of revealing sensitive histories but emphasize their commitment to pursuing the truth and preventing misinformation or manipulation. Overall, the transcript captures a tense, exploratory exchange between two veterans and affiliates about verifying SF credentials, the personal toll of custody and legal battles, the influence of political narratives, and the complexities of ballistics and forensics in high-profile incidents. The participants stress verification through documents, corroboration of anecdotes, and cautious, integrity-driven engagement with media figures and audiences.

A former CIA officer warns that over 1,000 Al Qaeda fighters may be in the U.S., potentially planning attacks. In a recent interview, Sarah Adams highlighted the risk of coordinated attacks across multiple cities, utilizing tactics like suicide bombings and fighters willing to die in combat. The recent attack in New Orleans and other incidents raise concerns about the effectiveness of intelligence and prevention measures. There are claims that Al Qaeda operatives have entered the U.S. through the southern border, increasing the threat level. Questions remain about the origins and intentions behind these attacks, particularly given connections to Fort Bragg. The discussion emphasizes the need for vigilance and thorough intelligence efforts to prevent future incidents.

Sam Shumate discusses a recent surge in interest surrounding Sarah Adams' warnings about terrorism in 2025. He reveals that he received a manifesto from a Green Beret, Matthew Livelsberger, before a bombing incident at Trump Hotel in Las Vegas. The manifesto contained alarming claims about drone technology and potential threats from China, alongside accusations of war crimes related to U.S. military operations in Afghanistan in 2019. Shumate emphasizes the need for accountability and transparency regarding these serious allegations. He also highlights the importance of community preparedness against potential threats, urging viewers to engage with local authorities and advocate for better security measures. The conversation raises concerns about national security and the implications of the information shared in the manifesto.

"Al Qaeda found the Building 7 conspiracy stuff fascinating. And they have actually had discussions about how could we could do ruses and bring in the Building 7 to make them blame their government more. So they're actually looking at our conspiracies and targeting those people for the homeland attack." "You had mentioned before that they are coordinating terrorist, sleeper sales in America, and they wanna do a October 7 style attack." "One's a large aviation plot again, and that they're just gonna do suicide bombers on planes and drop them down, and that's for mass casualty. The goal is to kill 4,000 people." "Get a phone call from a previous intelligence officer this morning, and she starts explaining how this chick is a complete fraud." "Everything's said in this video is just allegedly. I'm just a parody account over here, guys."

Sarah Adams claims that if you question Building 7 or discuss a conspiracy, you’re 'actually helping out. You're working for Al Qaeda.' She says 'Al Qaeda found the Building 7 conspiracy stuff fascinating' and that 'they're actually looking at our conspiracies and targeting those people for the homeland attack.' The discussion outlines three plotting elements: a large aviation plot to kill 4,000; an assault on Washington DC to cripple the federal government's response; and ISIS-led urban assaults on churches, supermarkets, hospitals at multiple locations, with possible targeting of law enforcement or impersonating them. A claim that Israel would carry out a false flag attack at hospitals dressed as police is raised. A caller labels Sarah a fraud, cites NRF in Pakistan fabricating reports, and says she feeds fake intel to intelligence agencies, asking for proof. 'Everything’s said in this video is just allegedly. I'm just a parody account.'

Foreign adversaries are using direct energy weapons on US citizens, known as Savannah Syndrome. A classified briefing revealed the severity of the situation, leaving the speaker, a former Navy SEAL, shaken. The speaker emphasizes the importance of the upcoming election due to leadership failures.