reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In May 2024, 194 WHO member states will vote on international agreements for pandemic prevention behind closed doors. These agreements give the WHO leadership in health matters related to pandemics, but the process is not widely reported or discussed in the media, parliaments, universities, or society.

We are experiencing a smooth coup. The plan is to create new laws and ignore existing human rights and other laws under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the biosecurity agenda. The WHO, led by its director, is developing a treaty on pandemics and amendments to existing international health regulations that will remove current human rights protections. This will enable surveillance, censorship, and the elimination of freedom of speech. Governments will be required to censor and promote only one narrative. We will also be obligated to develop vaccines within a hundred days, as planned by the SEPI organization. Other amendments include forcing states to issue executive orders instead of recommendations, removing intellectual property rights, and allowing the WHO director-general to declare a pandemic without constraints. The WHO will also dictate which medicines can be used in each country once a pandemic is declared. The budget will obviously increase. The concept of "One Health" will give the WHO jurisdiction over everything in the world, claiming that climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems are all central to health. This concept also diminishes the value of humans compared to animals.

The WHO is developing a pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations that will remove human rights protections and enforce surveillance and censorship. The goal is to develop vaccines in 100 days. The amendments would bind states to enforceable edicts, provide a liability shield, remove intellectual property rights, move supplies between countries, and enforce digital passports. The WHO director general can declare a pandemic with no standards, and countries must obey. The WHO will dictate which drugs can be used. One Health is a concept to enable the WHO to take over jurisdiction, suggesting humans are no longer of greater value than animals.

There is no way for people or member states to question the WHO's assessments, whether it's about public health emergencies, measures, or experimental vaccination regimes. Member states and citizens have no power to challenge these decisions.

There is concern about a soft coup happening, where new laws are being created under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and biosecurity. The World Health Organization (WHO) is developing a pandemic treaty that would remove human rights protections and enforce surveillance and censorship. Governments would be required to push a single narrative and censor information. Vaccines could be developed in just 100 days, and there are plans for digital passports. The WHO can declare a pandemic without standards, and countries would have to obey. The concept of "One Health" is also being used to expand the WHO's jurisdiction, claiming that climate change, animals, plants, and ecosystems are all central to health.

The WHO is set to have a final vote on two international agreements involving pandemic prevention and preparedness. This process is conducted privately and is not widely reported or discussed in the media, national parliaments, universities, or society. The WHO asserts its unquestionable leadership in all health matters through these legal instruments.

The WHO, under the leadership of the United States, is developing a pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations. These changes would remove human rights protections, enforce surveillance and censorship, restrict freedom of speech, and promote a single narrative. Vaccines could be developed in just 100 days, according to the organization CEPI. The amendments would bind states to enforceable measures, provide a liability shield, eliminate intellectual property rights, enforce digital passports, and allow the WHO director general to declare a pandemic without standards. The WHO would also dictate which drugs can be used during a pandemic. Additionally, the concept of One Health would give the WHO jurisdiction over climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems, while devaluing humans compared to animals. (150 words)

We are facing a soft coup where new laws are being created under the guise of pandemic preparedness, stripping away human rights protections. The WHO is pushing for a pandemic treaty that would enforce surveillance, censorship, and limit freedom of speech. Vaccines could be developed in just 100 days. These changes would give the WHO power to dictate which drugs countries can use during a pandemic. The concept of One Health would allow the WHO to control everything globally, with a belief that humans are no more valuable than animals.

There is concern about a soft coup happening, where new laws are being created under the pretext of pandemic preparedness. The World Health Organization (WHO) is developing a pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations. These changes would remove human rights protections, enforce surveillance and censorship, limit freedom of speech, and require governments to push a single narrative. Vaccines could be developed in just 100 days, and there are plans to bind states to enforceable regulations, provide liability shields, remove intellectual property rights, and move supplies between countries. Digital passports would be enforced, and the WHO director general could declare a pandemic without standards, with countries having to comply. The budget would increase, and the concept of One Health would give the WHO jurisdiction over everything, including climate change and ecosystems, with a belief that humans are not more valuable than animals.

The speaker discusses new pandemic agreements that give the WHO unprecedented power to declare emergencies and mandate medical interventions globally. These agreements also allow for censorship, state-controlled economies, and limited accountability for the WHO. Fundamental rights may be compromised under this regime.

The WHO, under the leadership of the United States, is developing a pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations. These changes would remove human rights protections, enforce surveillance and censorship, limit freedom of speech, and promote a single narrative. Vaccines could be developed in just 100 days, according to the organization CEPI. The amendments would bind states to enforceable measures, provide a liability shield, eliminate intellectual property rights, enforce digital passports, and allow the WHO director general to declare a pandemic without standards. The WHO would also dictate which drugs can be used during a pandemic. Additionally, the concept of One Health aims to give the WHO jurisdiction over climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems, while devaluing human life compared to animals. (148 words)

In May 2024, 194 WHO member states will vote on international agreements for pandemic prevention and response. The process is secretive and not publicly discussed. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

There is concern about a soft coup happening, where new laws are being created under the pretext of pandemic preparedness. The World Health Organization (WHO) is developing a pandemic treaty that would remove human rights protections and enforce surveillance, censorship, and a single narrative. The treaty would also allow for vaccines to be developed in just 100 days. Amendments to existing regulations would make these changes enforceable and provide a liability shield, remove intellectual property rights, enforce digital passports, and give the WHO director general the power to declare a pandemic without standards. The WHO would also dictate which drugs can be used during a pandemic. Additionally, the concept of One Health aims to give the WHO jurisdiction over everything by linking climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems to health, while devaluing humans compared to animals.

In May 2024, 194 member states of the WHO will vote on international agreements regarding pandemic prevention. The process is secretive and not publicly discussed. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

The WHO was selected to execute a "soft coup bloodlessly" through amendments that change international health regulations and a new pandemic treaty (aka pandemic accord/instrument). The new version removes language from the current health regulations that ensures implementation respects dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms. The IHRs are changing from recommendations to binding enforcements, requiring countries to create enforcement mechanisms. This includes enforced surveillance of people and microorganisms, enforced censorship, a single narrative, and harmonization of vaccine and drug regulation. Liability for these products will allegedly be eliminated. These documents come into force when the WHO director general declares a public health emergency of international concern, or even a risk of one, and his powers can continue after the emergency is contained.

There is concern about a soft coup happening, where new laws are being created under the pretext of pandemic preparedness. The World Health Organization (WHO) is developing a pandemic treaty that would remove human rights protections and enforce surveillance, censorship, and a single narrative. The treaty would also allow for vaccines to be developed in just 100 days. Amendments to existing regulations would make these changes enforceable and provide a liability shield, remove intellectual property rights, enforce digital passports, and give the WHO director general the power to declare a pandemic without standards. The WHO would also dictate which drugs can be used during a pandemic. Additionally, the concept of One Health aims to give the WHO jurisdiction over everything by linking climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems to health, while devaluing humans compared to animals.

The speakers discuss the achievements of the World Health Organization (WHO) in the past two years. They mention that the WHO is passing amendments to international health regulations, which member countries must actively opt out of to avoid accepting them. They express concern about the power given to the WHO's director general during a pandemic, as they can decide what actions to take. The speakers also mention that the definition of a pandemic has been changed, potentially leading to a situation where even a small number of cases in different countries could be classified as a pandemic. This would allow the WHO to seize governing powers of member states.

The WHO's new treaty and amendments are causing concern as they could potentially seize governing powers during a pandemic. This unelected body, funded by billionaires, could dictate when people can leave their homes, wear masks, and receive mRNA shots. It is seen as undemocratic and not in the best interest of the people. The United States government proposed changes to the treaty, but most were withdrawn due to public outrage. However, the WHO continues to pursue their agenda, finding alternative methods to achieve their goals.

The World Health Organization is allegedly attempting a global power grab to become a global ministry of health with divisions like the FDA and CDC. The WHO's definition of health encompasses every area of life, including climate, animals, and the environment via "One Health." According to the speaker, the head of the WHO, Tedros Ghebreyesus, considers climate change, racism, and gun violence to be public health emergencies. If these are public health emergencies, every area of life would fall under the WHO's control. The WHO adopted amendments to the international health regulations and intends to push through an international pandemic treaty by the end of the year or May 2025. They will allegedly continue until humanity says no.

The WHO international treaty being discussed at the UN allows for the suspension of civil liberties and rights in the event of a public health emergency, with no evidence required. Member states can be penalized for noncompliance, and the WHO has absolute immunity from criminal prosecution. This treaty, similar to past events like the anthrax scare and COVID, raises concerns about the potential abuse of power and loss of individual freedoms.

There is concern about a soft coup happening, where new laws are being created under the pretext of pandemic preparedness. The World Health Organization (WHO) is developing a pandemic treaty that would remove human rights protections and enforce surveillance and censorship. Governments would be required to push a single narrative and censor information. Vaccines could be developed in 100 days, and there would be enforceable rules instead of recommendations. Intellectual property rights would be eliminated, digital passports enforced, and the WHO could declare a pandemic without standards. The WHO would also dictate which drugs can be used during a pandemic. Additionally, the concept of One Health aims to give the WHO jurisdiction over everything by linking climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems to health.

The WHO will have a final vote on two international legal instruments. These instruments give the WHO complete authority over health matters, specifically in pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. The vote will involve 94 member states, but these instruments have not been widely discussed in newspapers, national parliaments, universities, or society.

The WHO is creating a treaty that could bypass sovereignty during pandemics and even include climate change. This treaty would give them control over plants, animals, and humans, allowing them to declare pandemics, implement emergency measures, enforce lockdowns, and mandate vaccinations. It would also impact livestock, farming, and energy management. Many people are opposing this overreach, including those who testified at the European Parliament. Some, like Trump, want to withdraw from the WHO to avoid international court involvement. A doctor named Russell plans to follow his own medical judgment rather than the WHO's guidance.

There is concern about a soft coup happening, where new laws are being created under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and biosecurity. The World Health Organization (WHO) is developing a pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations that would remove human rights protections, enforce surveillance and censorship, limit freedom of speech, and push a single narrative. The goal is to make these laws enforceable and remove liability and intellectual property rights. The WHO can declare a pandemic without standards, and countries would have to comply. The concept of "One Health" is also being used to expand the WHO's jurisdiction by linking climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems to health, while devaluing humans compared to animals.

There is concern about a soft coup happening, where new laws are being created under the guise of pandemic preparedness and biosecurity. The World Health Organization (WHO) is leading this effort, with the director in the United States overseeing a pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations. These changes would remove human rights protections, enforce surveillance and censorship, limit freedom of speech, and promote a single narrative. The WHO aims to develop vaccines in a short timeframe and have the power to declare a pandemic without standards. They would also dictate which drugs can be used during a pandemic. Additionally, the concept of "One Health" is being used to expand the WHO's jurisdiction to include climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems, while devaluing human life compared to animals.