reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker recounts the depth of the evil involved in Jeffrey Epstein’s network as described by survivors during a press conference. They explain that 14-year-old girls were told by a high school friend to come to an old man’s house, give him a massage, and he would pay $200, with a swimming pool and other enticements presented. The massage would escalate to sexual acts, and Epstein would keep their phone numbers. Through the shame and coercion, the girls were compelled to show up at his beck and call whenever he wanted. The only way they could get out of performing sexual favors was to find another girl at their high school who would take their place. One survivor broke down in tears as she admitted that she faced a choice between finding a replacement girl or returning to perform the acts, and she chose to find another girl. The speaker notes that even after it was known that these were 15-year-old girls coerced by an adult man, people still said they were sex traffickers and trafficked these women. The speaker emphasizes the realization of how evil it is for someone to make others commit evil acts and then implicate them, which made it harder for the survivors to come forward. There is discussion of why the names of the victims aren’t released. Epstein’s abuse involved billionaires who could pay off authorities and judges. After girls reached the age of consent, Epstein would traffic them to his friends, arguing that some were prostitutes who were 18 or older and thus consenting. The speaker explains that when these men had money, they could pay off police departments, cause reports to disappear, or influence judges. Many of the girls came from less affluent families, and the money paid to the families ranged from $150,000 up to $500,000, while the girl often would not testify. The men would then use defamation lawsuits to bankrupt the survivors who spoke out or tried to contest their false allegations. The process itself functions as punishment, with survivors forced to go broke just to defend their names.

I'm facing charges of human trafficking, rape, and forming a criminal gang for sexual exploitation. OnlyFans is the best hustle. I'm accused of using the "Lover Boy" method, being nice to coerce women. I never mention webcamming until after sex. My PhD program, "pimp and hose degree," teaches how to get girls to love me and work on webcam. I encourage them to work for me so we can spend more time together. My bottom girl is trained to do the selling. My MO was to find girls, make them love me, and make them work for me. I had multiple locations with many girls working for me, taking around half the money, claiming the disparity was due to taxes. I used sex to make women love and obey me, living in my house to make me money. I consider that being a pimp. I see the term pimp as a positive thing, referring to a positively inspirational and motivating person.

Speaker 0 recalls being 15 and waking up to Brian sexually assaulting him, frozen and unable to react. He had no car and no way to escape, and he kept the abuse secret to avoid questions about returning to Brian’s house for auditions or work. The abuse was extensive and brutal, not a one-time incident, and it grew worse over time as Brian manipulated others and used his connections to keep Drake in the cycle. Speaker 1 provides space for flare of what Drake felt and how the abuse continued, acknowledging the difficulty of describing the worst acts but noting it was calculated and persistent. Drake began spending time at his girlfriend’s house for safety, where her mother quickly noticed something was wrong. She confronted Drake and spoke to his mother, leading to therapy. Drake says he lied in therapy, saying everything was normal while realizing the manipulation and fear that kept him silent. Drake explains that Brian’s circle and influence in productions made it feel unsafe to speak out. He was pressured to stay silent to preserve his career, and he worried about losing future work if he disclosed the abuse. He also recounts a specific incident when Brian tried to take him to Disneyland despite Drake wanting to distance himself, ultimately prompting the girlfriend’s mother to intervene and arrange therapy. The narrative then shifts to the police involvement. Drake’s mother called the police after Drake exploded in a phone call, confessing what had happened. Detectives pressed for excruciating detail and required Drake to make a phone call to Brian to obtain a confession on a recording. Brian confessed, and Drake faced mixed emotions of relief and fear as the case progressed. Brian was arrested for horrific acts, and Drake’s phone messages indicate concern about public knowledge of the case. Following the arrest, Dan Schneider supported Drake; others advised him not to talk about it. Drake’s father expressed relief that Brian couldn’t harm him, reinforcing the sense of closure. Drake recalls when the public learned of the arrest and his own sensational experience; the emotional toll was severe, including hair loss and high stress. On sentencing day, Brian Peck was convicted and sentenced to sixteen months in jail and required to register as a sex offender after pleading no contest to two charges of child sexual abuse. The transcript notes attempts to unseal letters of support written for Brian, including by James Marsden, Terum Killam, and others. These letters, kept sealed for two decades, showed industry support for Brian, with some letters blaming the victim or suggesting temptations influenced his actions, including letters from Joanna Kearns and Kimmy Robertson. Notably, Nickelodeon executives did not write letters, but Hollywood insiders did; some letters imply Brian’s culpability was mitigated by external pressures. Speaker 0 reflects on the aftermath: a slow decline in mental health and sobriety, with DUIs and self-destructive behaviors. The show Drake & Josh continued production, and Drake used work as a coping mechanism. After the arrest, Drake questioned whether Nickelodeon or executives reached out, noting a lack of therapy and being left to cope alone. The story touches on Brian’s later actions, court outcomes, and Drake’s ongoing struggle with the trauma, though a period of sentencing and public reaction follow. Drake ultimately sought treatment, trauma therapy, grief therapy, and a supportive environment to begin healing, acknowledging the long road ahead and the difficulty of revisiting memories.

Speaker 0 asks, “Am I a bad person? … the more you didn’t like it, the more I enjoyed it. I loved how much you hated it. Turn me on. Why am I like that?” and questions why. Speaker 1 recounts: during sex, he put his hand on her throat and strangled her until she lost consciousness, but he continued having sex as she came back around. Speaker 0 declares, “I am one of the most dangerous men on this planet. … I’m the smartest person on this planet,” suggesting he’d rather pin her down to make her do things she didn’t like, or that he could do whatever he wants. Speaker 1 notes, the next day one of the whites of her eyes had turned completely red, explaining that lack of oxygen can cause blood vessels to burst, a common feature in domestic abuse cases. Speaker 0 asks if she’s seriously offended that he strangled her a little, noting she didn’t pass out. Speaker 1 says he kept saying, “I own you. You belong to me,” and threatened to kill her. Speaker 0 responds with a dismissive, “Chill the out. Jesus Christ. I thought you were cool.”

Speaker 0 admits to engaging in sexual activities with children who willingly came to his bed. Speaker 1 expresses concern about the harm caused by adults forcing sexuality on children. Speaker 2 shares their experience of being groomed by an adult and manipulated into liking the abuse. Speaker 3 questions how someone as intelligent as Speaker 0 could justify their actions. Speaker 0 defends their behavior, claiming not to know why they engaged in pedophilia. The video ends with Speaker 0 expressing disgust at the idea of acting in their own biography and advocating for intergenerational sex for stronger family bonds.

The speaker shares their personal experience of being trafficked and abused by powerful individuals, including Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Steven Tyler. They emphasize the importance of focusing on the people in between the elites, such as teachers and local police, who are complicit in the trafficking. The speaker mentions underground tunnels connecting schools, cemeteries, amusement parks, and Hollywood elite homes. They discuss the lack of action from authorities, the cover-ups by CPS and the FBI, and the threats they have faced. The speaker also mentions MK Ultra mind control programming and dissociative identity disorder. They stress that human trafficking is a humanity issue and call for exposure and justice.

The speaker discusses their personal experiences with human trafficking and sexual abuse, mentioning names like Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Michelle Obama. They claim to have been trafficked to various elite locations, including Buckingham Palace and the Getty Museum, and emphasize the importance of focusing on the people in between the top elites. They mention the complicity of authorities, such as the FBI and local police, in covering up these crimes. The speaker also talks about the existence of underground tunnels and the widespread nature of child trafficking. They mention evidence, including police reports and videos, but express frustration at the lack of action taken. They highlight the connection between human trafficking and other crimes like organ harvesting. The speaker urges for awareness and action to stop these atrocities.

Speaker 0, Jeffrey Edward Epstein and my residence address is 6100 Red Hook Boulevard in Virgin Islands. Speaker 1: Is it true that you forced Virginia Roberts to have sex with numerous friends of yours? Speaker 0: Wouldn't love my fifth amendment right. Speaker 2: You had a number of meetings with Jeffrey Epstein, who, when you met him ten years ago, he was convicted of soliciting prostitution from minors. Speaker 3: And, you know, I've said I regretted having those dinners regretted having those dinners. We did what we did because we wanted to see Epstein go to jail. He needed to go to jail. Were there young women in another part of the house giving massages, when I wasn't around? I have no idea of that. Speaker 1: Sent him three 12 year old girls from France who spoke no English for defendant to sexually exploit and abuse. After doing so, they were sent back to France the next day. Speaker 0: Please, they never saw a young underage woman. Speaker 3: You know, those meetings were were a mistake. They didn't result in what he purported, and I cut them off. You know, that goes back a long time ago now. There's you know, so there's nothing new on that. Speaker 2: We now know that he was and had been procuring young girls for sex trafficking. Speaker 0: We now know that. At the time, there was no indication to me or anybody else. I kept my underwear on during the massage. I don't like massages particularly. Speaker 3: If we had had more transparency, perhaps this case would have gone differently. Speaker 2: It was reported that you continued to meet with him over several years. Speaker 3: You know, I had dinners with him. I regret doing that. Speaker 0: You have what's been described as an egg shaped penis. Speaker 3: Well, he's dead. So, you know, in general, you always have to be careful.

The speaker shares their personal experience of being trafficked and abused by powerful individuals, including Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Steven Tyler. They emphasize the importance of focusing on the people in between the elite and highlight the prevalence of child trafficking in schools and underground tunnels. The speaker mentions the lack of action from authorities, including the FBI and local police, who are complicit in covering up these crimes. They discuss the existence of MK Ultra mind control programming and dissociative identity disorder as a result of trauma. The speaker calls for awareness and action to stop human trafficking and expose those involved.

Speaker 0 describes a violent, coercive sequence framed as self-defense and pimping instructions. He begins: “When I grab you by your neck and you start annoying me trying to resist and I just And then I grab you by your neck again. Then what you're do when your face is collapsed and your cheekbones broken. Ain't gonna do cry.” He claims: “I guarantee I changed the way you look at sex forever. You're gonna be crying. I won't cry. I bet you cry, bitch. I bet you cry.” He questions: “You're saying I I wouldn't cry. You're challenging me to a fight. You're saying I can't hurt you. You're out of your mind? I don't even know you.” He says to ignore the sex part: “Forget the sex part. That's a distraction. Stay in my pants. I'll just start beating at you. How about that?” They walk to the bedroom: “We walk in the bedroom. I start kicking your [No sex. No sex involved. But you cry then.]” He adds: “I perfected this in pimp school. When I got my PhD, we had to practice if a girl comes at you. How are you cheating? You cheating. It's bang out the machete, boom in her face, and then grip her up by the neck. Her panties get wet.” He further describes: “Machete's on the floor, her panties are all wet, You fuck her. That's how it goes. Slap, slap, grab, choke, shut up bitch, sex. These are the basic moves of of pimping.”

The conversation centers on a trafficking operation involving sexual exploitation of very young children, with several details about how the system works, who’s involved, and what happens to the victims. - Meeting and control: The trafficker had been contacting the speaker by phone that night to arrange in-person dialogue, with intermediaries making intentions unclear. The trafficker repeatedly changed the meeting time, and final directions were given about 30 minutes before the interview. The speakers emphasize the danger and precarity of contact through intermediaries. - Terminology and targets: The trafficker uses specific terms: “merchandise” for boys and “dolly” for girls. A 10-year-old boy is considered too old for certain purposes; a three- or four-year-old child is described as preferred for sexual activities, with graphic details about age and activities. - Routine and condition of the children: The sexual abuse is described as a long, sustained event, sometimes lasting many hours, with no regular breaks solely due to clients. If one child tires, another is used. Children are given nourishment, vitamins, and sometimes IV drips or injections to keep them functioning and appearing healthy. The day-to-day abuse is described as a form of “breeding” and “recycling,” with children being kept alive for ongoing use until they are no longer deemed useful. - Medical and protective care: Women who look after the children are described as “aunties,” with some cruel behavior (e.g., pulling hair). Some care is provided to keep the children functional, though the environment is described as perverse and coercive, with children initially unresponsive even to their own names. - Locations and scale: The speaker knows of about four brothels in Europe, located in Belgium, Germany, and Poland, including one in Tri City, Poland, described as a regular house. The sexual activity occurs before organs are removed, implying preparation for transplantation. - Financials and exploitation: The price for the full set of services is described as around half a million euros, with the understanding that the child becomes “useless” after that. Younger children (including four-year-olds) are kept for ongoing exploitation, while older children (six or eight and up) are used for regular sex before disposal. - Disposal and the dark net: After children reach about 14, they are disposed of or sent elsewhere; in some cases, they are photographed or filmed for sharing on the dark net. There are mentions of “VIP entertainment” and extreme sexual violence, including suffocation as a common fantasy and other brutal acts. - Perpetrators and beliefs: The traffickers are described as part of a sect with satanic elements, greeting each other with two specific words and possessing a pentagram, sometimes found under inscriptions. They are depicted as controlling and predatory, with some perpetrators showing a chilling level of premeditation and ritualism. - Real-life case: A mother is pressured over eighteen months to dispose of her child for cash, ultimately selling a four- or five-year-old for about €10,000, believing the child would be adopted abroad, but it was diverted for spare parts.

The speaker admits to being the head of an organized criminal group that recruits girls for TikTok videos. They face charges of human trafficking, rape, and forming a criminal gang. The speaker discusses their involvement in the webcam business, using the "lover boy method" to coerce girls into working for them. They claim to have built an empire of webcam girls, taking around 50% of their earnings. The speaker also mentions instances of physical abuse and manipulation. They deny being a rapist but admit to living in Romania for freedom. The speaker sees themselves as a positive and motivating figure, referring to themselves as a pimp. They recommend a book on pimping as a guide. The speaker denies some of the accusations made against them.

Speaker 1 claims that places and activities depicted in movies like "Hostel" exist in real life. She says she knows three women she removed from Epstein Island and has cared for them for three years. According to Speaker 1, the women auditioned to be models for music videos, but upon arriving in Miami, their IDs and passports were taken, and they were drugged. They were then allegedly sexually assaulted and filmed by strangers bidding online. Afterward, they were sent to Rick Ross's music video shoots to appear as groupies and extras. Speaker 1 states that after this, they were sent to Epstein Island to be prepared for Dubai and Moscow. She says the women didn't speak for weeks after their experience, but she heard what they yelled in their sleep. Speaker 1 claims these women appeared in videos online after being systematically beaten, starved, and sodomized, but were smiling in the videos.

Speaker 0 recalls the release of Sound of Freedom and how it affected him personally, noting he watched it by himself and it wrecked him even though he doesn’t have kids. He asks the audience if they saw the movie, and recalls that many said no or avoided it as “too much.” He observes that now the topic is appearing in mainstream media and social platforms, and even in radio through references to the Epstein files in songs. He asks what people will do now and whether they will continue to turn a blind eye. He states that trafficking has been happening and is disgusting, demonic, and terrible. He mentions that young children are being trafficked and groomed to become traffickers, and that there are people who run them and people above them who “eat the flesh,” noting he won’t be too graphic. He then poses a core question: what are you going to do? If you are a follower of Christ, he encourages not to stay silent because that is not what the Bible says. He reiterates that children are still being trafficked, not necessarily by the same people, but involving many pedophiles and sick, twisted individuals. He ends with “So what are you gonna do? Love you all.”

There are interviews with survivors, rescue operations, and therapists discussing long-standing abuse. Evidence includes eyewitness accounts, surveillance footage of children being snatched, and dark web content like Hurtcore. Children are trafficked, raped, and tortured for profit. Organ transplants involving live babies are investigated. FBI documents detail terms for pedophilia, like "cheese pizza." Traffickers target single mothers, children, and elected officials. The speaker emphasizes the reality of these atrocities and urges people to acknowledge the widespread issue.

Speaker 0: Britney Spears' name has been mentioned multiple times in the Epstein files. I'm curious why I haven't seen anything about this on my FYP. Day after day, she is being laughed at by Hollywood, laughed at by the media, laughed at by the world. But seriously, we knew there was something deeper going on with this situation. And the only question I have is, where are her friends? Aside from a few dressing up as her for Halloween and using #FreeBritney, they haven't done much. It’s starting to look to me like Britney Spears was experimented on. Why would doctor Mark Tremo, who is affiliated with UCLA, be emailing Jeffrey Epstein about Britney Spears' conservatorship or her custody battles or the neonatal ICU project? Britney Spears was treated like a literal slave by everybody around her and made her go mad. She was exploited from the time she started the Mickey Mouse Club, and don’t pay attention to what those posters behind her say, until she was a 40-year-old woman. And even though Hollywood treated her like a monkey in a circus and danced her to her own deathbed, she still to this day can’t stop performing. It’s almost like she’s programmed or something. But many people have spoken out about this. It’s just the world did not want to hear it. Speaker 1: Do you believe that Britney was trafficked, shoe, Diddy, and absolutely. All of those girls. All of those Mickey Mouse girls, including Christina Aguilera. All of them, all of these children have been trafficked. Part of the reason why they can’t tell you was because they were drugged. Yeah. But most of what was happening to them was happening. And what they have left are the memories and the nightmares. Now they think they’re just bad dreams, but they’re memories. And because they’ve been drugged, and they’ve been handled, and they’ve been shrunk to death, they don’t know what to believe, but they can feel it. Speaker 0: And I will stand by the fact that Britney Spears was failed by everybody, her family, her lovers, and especially her friends, because it took a team of people to do this to her. And anyone in the industry that claims that they protect children but don’t protect the children in the industry are just snakes to me.

In this video, the speaker shares their personal experiences of being a victim of child abuse, trafficking, and exploitation. They discuss the abuse they endured from various individuals, including authority figures, and their involvement in underground tunnels and secret rituals. The speaker also mentions auctions where children are sold to elites, even at Buckingham Palace. They emphasize that trafficking is not limited to the elite and occurs in everyday settings. The need for awareness and action to address the widespread issue of human trafficking is highlighted. The speaker also shares their experience of escaping a dangerous situation and emphasizes the importance of unconditional love. They express gratitude for not experiencing worse situations and urge others to fight for those who cannot speak for themselves. The lack of mainstream coverage of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial is mentioned, and the speaker questions where donated money is going. Raising awareness and protecting children from trafficking is emphasized, with a call for parents to educate themselves and their children. The speaker stresses the need for action and unity to dismantle the entire trafficking network.

- The conversation centers on Andrew Tate and a divide in the conservative space about whether he is a “good guy” or a bad guy. A video of Tate is shown to frame the discussion. - A video excerpt from Speaker 1 features Tate describing how he became a multimillionaire by creating a webcam studio. He explains he took girls who lacked experience or equipment and built a system that allowed him to convince them to participate, retain 100% control of their income, and ensure they were effective in a highly competitive industry. He stresses that it’s not easy money and that the process requires many tips and tricks to ensure a girl can make money from home, implying that once trained, a girl could potentially earn unlimited money. He also questions why a girl would stay with him once she can make money independently. - Speaker 0 argues that Tate was a webcam operator who objectified women and acted like a pimp. They reference a separate video showing Tate allegedly whipping a girl and note that if the girl was 15 at the time based on Tate’s stated age, that would be problematic. They ask whether Tate should be given a pass and invite thoughts on fairness in criticizing him. - Speaker 2 weighs in with nuance, saying it is not black-and-white and that they have not done a deep dive into Tate’s entire situation. They acknowledge Tate’s past involvement with encouraging girls to participate in OnlyFans-style content and express disapproval, hoping Tate would publicly acknowledge that this was a mistake and express regret. They note that many women enter porn or stripping due to desperation or trafficking, suggesting vulnerability in those Tate might have preyed upon. They admit uncertainty about whether Tate committed criminal acts, mentioning potential legal age issues (Tate operating in a country where the legal age of consent is 16, and a separate girl possibly being 15) and the absence of victims coming forward. - Speaker 2 also claims Tate has been unfairly persecuted. They describe a prior raid/arrest and a social media “PizzaGate” narrative on X (formerly Twitter), arguing that while PizzaGate itself is real, Tate’s alleged actions do not compare to Hillary Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged activities. They emphasize that Tate is being portrayed unfairly and that redemption would be preferable. - Both speakers discuss redemption and reform: Speaker 2 suggests Tate could seek redemption by stating regret for past actions, condemning the porn/OnlyFans route, and encouraging women to avoid or leave such work, highlighting the need for support, healing, and respect for women who have experienced abuse. They suggest a forgiving community could respond positively to an acknowledgment and a commitment to change, rather than punitive treatment.

Speaker 0 notes that the people are not accusing him of rape or selling anyone; they are facing charges including human trafficking, rape, and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit. Speaker 1 describes OnlyFans as “the best hustle in the world.” He explains the alleged methods: using the “lover boy method,” coercing by being nice, and not mentioning webcam until after sex. He says mentioning webcam on dates “just doesn’t work” and claims he would never do that, arguing the technique is to proceed normally and introduce webcam later. Speaker 2 and Speaker 3 discuss a program called PhD on corporatetake.com: “PhD is a pimp and hose degree.” He claims it teaches how he met girls, how he got girls to like him, how he got girls to fall in love with him to work on webcam, and how to have them spend more time with him. He describes inviting a prospective recruit to a meeting and bringing a girl who works for “Your bottom bitch” to explain the selling. The process emphasizes a “first girl” as pivotal, with girls on camera together the first day so the new girl can observe and imitate. Speaker 4 recounts specific experiences: being bought wine and becoming nervous about webcam work; the narrator describes wealth from webcam operations and retaining girls; he mentions four locations and 75 girls, with roughly half of the money going to the workers, claiming a 50% split and suggesting taxes explain the disparity. Another worker, paid a flat £15 per hour, notes large sums from clients who believed they would meet the girl. Speaker 1 describes a pattern where men fell in love with his models and sent large amounts of money, including people selling houses and life savings. He states: “I used sex as a tool to make women love me so they'd obey me and live in my house to make me money. That’s what I wanted. So I was a pimp in that sense.” He discusses the emotional manipulation that led clients to believe they would meet the girl. Speaker 5 remains skeptical, labeling the operation “pimpy.” Speaker 1 argues about the Me Too era, saying he is not a rapist in a way that would be labeled, yet he admits he likes the freedom to do what he wants. Speaker 6 challenges Speaker 1 by quoting his own statements: that his job was to meet a girl, sleep with her, get her to fall in love, and then get her on webcam to become rich together. Speaker 1 denies that exact quote, but Speaker 6 insists it matches what was said on the website. Speaker 0 reiterates that the belief is he was charged with human trafficking, and Speaker 1 clarifies that “human trafficking” is framed as forcing a girl to work for financial gain, noting TikTok accounts from some girls as part of the justification. He reiterates the PhD as a pimp and hose degree he claims to be pleasant about.

The speaker references a DOJ law enforcement map called the red dot map, where every red dot represents at least one unique IP address of individuals downloading, sharing, or distributing child abuse images involving children under 12. There are over 111,000 such IPs in the United States in the last 30 days. The problem is not limited to gangs or international networks; families are also involved, and the issue is present in the speaker’s own backyard, not just overseas. The speaker shares alarming anecdotes to illustrate the cruelty of the abuse. One story describes a 13-year-old girl who is abused while someone reads the Bible to her, with the Bible read in rotation by different people during the abuse, in an attempt to connect the worst moment of her life with God's word. Another anecdote, cited by a psychologist friend, concerns an offender who stood at a playground watching boys and girls, selected a child, and explained that he chose that child to steal her soul—an emphasis on premeditated targeting of a child’s happiness and vulnerability. The speaker stresses a belief that God has created some people to stand in the gap between abusers and victims, so victims would know that some people love them and that God loves them. The speaker asserts a call to rally people to form an army, possibly declare a national emergency, and leverage all resources to help victims escape this evil. The overarching message is that the issues are growing and that progress is not being made; the speaker contends that “we aren’t winning” and that “we’re losing every day until enough people stand on the line” to fight the evil, declare it, and defend the vulnerable. The message culminates in a moral exhortation: those victims are worth fighting for, as they were worth it to King Jesus to die for, and therefore-worthy of collective action to stand against the abuse and protect children.

Before being trafficked to various locations, one victim described being strangled, threatened with a knife, and facing threats to her home. She was victimized numerous times and lost count of her abusers due to their numbers. In response, there was a call for more respectful language regarding the victim's experience. It was emphasized that the use of language should avoid inflaming or inciting discrimination. The speaker was reminded to tone down the rhetoric and focus on asking questions without being overly descriptive.

A woman who has been involved in trafficking for many years discusses the disturbing shift in the industry. Previously, traffickers would force girls to have abortions, but now they deliberately impregnate them to provide babies for the trafficking world. These babies often do not survive long, as they are starved and subjected to horrific abuse. Technology companies, like Ericsson, have connected evil individuals and facilitated live rapes online. Governments have the power to stop this, but choose not to. There is a genre of sadistic pornography that focuses on hurting children and trafficking victims. These acts are real and based on firsthand accounts. The individuals involved in these crimes are considered wicked, as they aim to inflict pain on God's creation.

Former Labour adviser Scarlett Maguire and political commentator Amon Bogle discuss front-page claims about the grooming inquiry, framing it as sabotage by Labour and a government-controlled process. - Speaker 1 (Amon Bogle) says the Telegraph front page alleges the grooming inquiry was sabotaged by Labour, and argues the inquiry from the outset was a follow-up of a cover-up spanning three decades, noting Labour initially refused a national inquiry. He asserts the government is manipulating the inquiry by refusing victims and survivors the chance to name perpetrators as Pakistanis, and by preventing examination of religious aspects of the abuse. - Speaker 2 (Scarlett Maguire) contends the issue is not an “Asian grooming gangs” problem but a Pakistani problem in the UK, with the vast majority of perpetrators from Mirpur in Pakistan. She says two women removed themselves from the inquiry because they were being silenced by the government from looking into race. - Speaker 0 (host) remarks on the broader fear of addressing the issue, recounting community knowledge of grooming in shops, gyms, and corner shops, and says he knows the abuse continues and no one is doing anything about it. - Speaker 2 adds that the country has been too scared to discuss the perpetrators, noting that police, social workers, and care workers were afraid of being labeled racist if they spoke out. - Speaker 3 (another participant) notes that there were conflated timelines and that early on, victims faced police or social workers who could be perceived as perpetrators in some cases. He mentions Kirsty Dahmer as the person who first brought grooming cases to court and reopened cases that had been closed, stressing the difficulty of running any inquiry that listens to all parties. - Speaker 3 emphasizes the challenge of conducting an inquiry where social workers and police are involved, and argues that victims and vulnerable young women in care were abused by social workers, the men who did it, and later by the police. He underlines the horrific nature of these events and notes that what happened is still happening today. - The discussion notes the ongoing impact on young women in care, with a final, emotive remark that reading a certain girl’s book would break one’s heart, signaling the lasting harm and urgency of the issue.

The speaker shares their personal experience of being trafficked and abused by powerful individuals, including Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Steven Tyler. They emphasize the importance of focusing on the people in between the elite and highlight the prevalence of child trafficking in schools and underground tunnels. The speaker discusses the complicity of authorities, including the FBI and local police, in covering up these crimes. They mention evidence such as police reports, rape kits, and videos, but express frustration at the lack of action taken. The speaker also mentions MK Ultra mind control programming and dissociative identity disorder. They stress that child trafficking is a humanity issue and call for exposure and justice.