TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Shortly after 9/11, the speaker encountered Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz at the Pentagon. A general called him urgently, revealing that they had decided to go to war with Iraq. When asked why, the general admitted they didn't have any new evidence connecting Saddam to Al Qaeda. The decision was made because they didn't know what else to do about terrorism and believed their military could overthrow governments. Weeks later, the speaker asked if they were still going to war with Iraq, to which the general responded that it was even worse. He showed the speaker a classified memo outlining plans to attack seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and ending with Iran. The speaker regrets not seeing the memo and asks for the general's name.

What were our troops doing in a foreign country that never attacked us? Who believes the official version on 09:11? Maybe God wanted you to find out that 09:11 is a fraud and that our country actually has the satanic world government located in New York called the United Nations. Our country is taking over the whole world for Satan and Israel. Troops think they're fighting for America and for freedom, but they're wrong. They tell the troops we need to go fight these horrible Muslims because they put homosexuals to death so that we can bring faggotry to the Middle East. I am not pro war and I'm never going to be pro war and the bible is not a pro war book and this aggressive, we're going to take over the world and put a military base in every country is not biblical and I want nothing to do with it. I believe in self defense and defending our nation, but not in invading foreign countries because of phantoms and boogeyman that our own government has created for the profit of the military industrial complex. Nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved American lives, and it also murdered and massacred hundreds of thousands of women and children and that is a sin.

The speaker talks about the reasons behind the Iraq war, dismissing the idea of nuclear weapons or biological weapons. They mention that the war was all about oil. They recall an incident where an inspector found no evidence of nuclear weapons, but later committed suicide under suspicious circumstances. The speaker also describes the sight of numerous oil pipes when they entered Iraq, with many of them on fire, causing the sky to be black for days.

My son Sean was killed in the Benghazi attack. He was a proud member of the US foreign service. Sean told me he was going to die the night before the attack. He was murdered by terrorists. I blame Hillary Clinton for his death. She lied about the attack being terrorism. I saw her lie to me and call me a liar.

Mister Bois, when will you apologize for the 1,000,000 Iraqis who suffered due to your lies? You deceived us about weapons of destruction and connections.

I was upset when a friend of mine was killed, so I asked a Vietnamese person for his ID card. When he didn't understand me, I got angry and killed him. I didn't feel bothered by it at all. I reported it as one VC killed, and they asked how I knew he was a VC. I replied that he was dead, and they laughed. In Vietnam, we had to report every kill and search the bodies for papers. The body count was important, even if we didn't actually see any enemies. The high command would exaggerate the numbers to make it seem like we were successful, but in reality, many of us were killed for nothing.

The speaker recalls a conversation about going to war with Iraq. They question the reason behind it and inquire about any evidence linking Saddam to Al Qaeda, but there is none. The speaker later learns about a memo outlining plans to attack seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and ending with Iran. When they ask if the memo is classified, the person confirms it is. The speaker mentions bringing up the memo again in a recent conversation, but the person denies ever showing it to them.

One day we stormed a French position. I confronted a French corporal; with bayonets at the ready, I killed him—tossed his rifle away, and ran my bayonet through his chest. Blood came out of his mouth. I felt physically ill, knees shaking, ashamed. My comrades were undisturbed and boasted of killings—one with a rifle butt, another strangling a captain, another hitting with a spade. They were ordinary people: a tram conductor, a commercial traveler, two students, farm workers. We were told that 'the good soldier kills without thinking of his an adversary as a human being.' But I had the dead man before me; I would have shaken his hand if he had raised his hand. 'a man who had father and mother and a family perhaps, and so I felt.' I woke drenched in sweat, thinking what would have happened if I wasn't quicker. 'Anything else? That's beautiful.'

The speaker recalls a conversation where a general informed him that the decision to go to war with Iraq had been made without any evidence connecting Saddam to Al Qaeda. The general mentioned that the military's only solution to dealing with terrorists was to take down governments. Later, the speaker learned about a memo outlining plans to attack seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq. The video then mentions military operations in Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan. It concludes by mentioning the investigation into the misuse of intelligence information and the speaker's belief that evidence points to wrongdoing.

I was told we're going to war with Iraq without any solid reason, just because. Then, I found out there's a plan to take out 7 countries in 5 years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.

After 9/11, a general told me the decision to go to war with Iraq was made without evidence linking Saddam to Al Qaeda. Plans were revealed to take out 7 countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. Military operations began in Iraq and Syria. The situation in Syria was discussed, acknowledging the distressing images coming out of the country.

An Iraqi rides on the ground, wounded. Marines kill him and then cheer. The speaker describes it as a good and awesome feeling. He says it makes you want to do it again.

Nations debate before going to war, as seen in WWII and post 9/11. The US gathered power after Pearl Harbor, leading to the decision to remove Saddam for regional stability. However, the absence of WMDs in Iraq raised questions about the invasion's justification. Soldiers shared experiences of dehumanization and disregard for life in Iraq, leading to personal reflections on the true purpose of war. Redemption was found in acknowledging the human cost of conflict.

He poisoned his own people, showing he doesn't value individuals. We must stop the terror. The tyrant has fallen, and Iraq is free. Now watch this drive.

About 10 days after 9/11, the speaker met with Secretary Rumsfeld at the Pentagon. A general informed him that they had decided to go to war with Iraq, but when asked why, the general had no answer. There was no evidence linking Saddam to Al Qaeda, but they felt they had a strong military and could overthrow governments. Later, the speaker learned that there was a memo outlining plans to attack seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and ending with Iran. The speaker asked if the memo was classified, and it was confirmed to be so.

What were our troops doing in a foreign country that never attacked us? Who believes the official version of 9/11? Maybe God led you here to find out 9/11 is a fraud and the satanic world government, the United Nations, is located in New York. Our country is taking over the whole world for Satan and Israel. Troops think they're fighting for America and freedom, but they're wrong. They tell the troops they need to fight horrible Muslims because they put homosexuals to death, so we can bring faggotry to the Middle East. I am not pro-war, and the Bible is not a pro-war book. This aggressive, we're going to take over the world and put a military base in every country is not biblical. I believe in self-defense and defending our nation, but not invading foreign countries because of phantoms and boogeymen created by our government for the profit of the military-industrial complex. Nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved American lives, but it also murdered hundreds of thousands of women and children, and that is a sin.

Nations don't go to war easily, sometimes needing to be bombed into it, like Pearl Harbor in World War II and September 11. Removing Saddam's regime would have positive effects, as he used weapons of mass destruction and sought nuclear weapons. A year after September 11, the U.S. had the courage to win. The terrorists attacked and killed 3,000 citizens before the freedom agenda in the Middle East. The main reason for going into Iraq was the belief that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, which turned out to be false, and had nothing to do with 9/11. Some suggest the U.S. sometimes needs a catalyst for war, like Pearl Harbor or the Lusitania. Covert actions against Iran were mentioned, including intensifying pressure. Netanyahu reportedly said the September 11 attacks were good for Israel. Some left the military due to being lied to about weapons of mass destruction and ties to Al Qaeda. Instructions were given to shoot at anything that moved after IED explosions, desensitizing soldiers by dehumanizing Iraqis. There was a total disregard for human life. One individual apologized to an Iraqi man, finding it redemptive.

I am returning my global war on terrorism medal and national defense medal because they are both fives. I am giving back my medals for the people of Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, and all victims of occupation worldwide. Specifically, I dedicate this medal to the children of Iraq who have lost their parents. As a nuclear, biological, and chemical specialist, I served in a war that had no weapons of mass destruction, leading me to desert. I am one of 40,000 individuals who left the US Armed Forces due to this lie. Do these medals truly acknowledge a job well done, or do they conceal lies, corruption, and the mistreatment of young men and women?

We were in a broken combat situation near Najaf. They weren't even based there; just popping in and out. There were bank runners approaching, and I remember a scared female soldier. I even made a derogatory comment about her in a video. Sadly, she killed herself on the ten-year anniversary, and it really affected me. I decided to leave the video up as a reminder. Later, in Liberia, I saw Rob O'Neil holding back crowds. The locals would come up to us with human heads. They called us "brother Americans" and explained how Liberia was founded by freed American slaves. They were incredibly grateful and even recited parts of the U.S. Constitution. The people in positions of power were cannibals. Due to this curse, I went above and beyond to help others but hurt them in the process.

I am Josephine Gilbo, a former army veteran with intelligence experience. The government is bombing homes with children inside, causing civilian casualties. The politicians in Capitol Hill lie repeatedly. Through lobbying, I've realized how corrupt our government is, using military personnel as pawns for personal gain.

After 9/11, I visited the Pentagon and spoke with a general who informed me that the decision had been made to go to war with Iraq, despite no evidence linking Saddam to Al Qaeda. The rationale seemed to be a lack of options in dealing with terrorism, leading to a military approach. A few weeks later, while we were bombing Afghanistan, the same general revealed a memo outlining plans to target seven countries over five years, starting with Iraq and including Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and ending with Iran. He mentioned the memo was classified and advised against viewing it.

The speaker reflects on killing a man in front of his wife during a military operation. He questions the justification for his actions, tracing it back to political motivations. He shot the man because he went for a gun, but the speaker was in his room at 2 AM. He attributes his presence there to George W. Bush's anger over Saddam Hussein allegedly wanting to kill his father, leading to an invasion based on the premise of weapons of mass destruction. The speaker wonders if he might have liked the man under different circumstances, such as meeting him in Paris, and laments killing him due to political reasons.

"Of the war in Iraq was a big fat mistake. They lied. Okay. They said there were weapons of mass destruction. There were none, and they knew there were none." "Bush got us into this horrible war with lies by lying, by saying they had weapons of mass destruction, by saying all sorts of things that turned out not to be true." "I lost a lot of friends that were killed in that building. The worst attack ever in this country, it was during his presidency." "We spent $2,000,000,000,000, thousands of lives, wounded warriors all over the place we're in."

About ten days after 9/11, the speaker describes going through the Pentagon and seeing Secretary Rumsfeld. A general then pulls him aside and says they must talk briefly. The general says, “we’ve made the decision. We’re going to war with Iraq.” When the speaker asks, “Why?” the general replies, “I guess they don’t know what else to do.” The speaker asks if they found information connecting Saddam to Al Qaeda. The response is, “No. There’s nothing new that way.” The general explains they had “made the decision to go to war with Iraq,” and that it seems, as the speaker reflects, “we don’t know what to do about terrorists, but we got a good military and we can take down governments.” A few weeks later, the speaker returns to see the general amid bombing campaigns in Afghanistan and inquires again, “We still going to war with Iraq?” The answer is presented as worse than prior: the speaker says the general tells him, “I just got this down from upstairs, meeting the secretary of defense office today.” He describes a memo that outlines “how we're gonna take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran.” The speaker asks if the memo is classified, and the general confirms, “yes, sir.” He adds, “Don’t show it to” (the transcript ends there). Key elements include the asserted decision to invade Iraq without evidence of a direct link to Al Qaeda, the perception that the administration chose military action because other options were unclear, and the claim of a broader plan to “take out seven countries in five years” beginning with Iraq and extending through Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran, with the memo described as classified. The account ties the Iraq invasion decision to a larger strategic agenda and emphasizes a chain of communication from the secretary of defense’s office to field-level comprehension, all within the context of ongoing Afghanistan bombing.

10 days after 9/11, a general informed me that we were going to war with Iraq. When I asked why, he didn't have a clear answer but mentioned that our military was capable of taking down governments. Weeks later, while we were bombing Afghanistan, I asked if we were still going to war with Iraq. To my surprise, he showed me a memo from the secretary of defense's office outlining a plan to take out 7 countries in 5 years. The countries listed were Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.