TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at leading medical journals, including the New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, Lancet, and BMJ, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy, but these findings were ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

Speaker 0 reports that fertility clinics have observed drastic reproductive issues linked to inoculation: “the sperm of inoculated men does not swim. The eggs of inoculated women do not grow into embryos,” with those conceptions showing “a huge amount of contamination with stuff that's non organic.” They reference a Pfizer safety study in the first New England Journal of Medicine (June 2021), stating that, “if you look at the raw data, it proves that eighty percent of the women who get the shot in this first and second trimester, basically zero to twenty weeks, have an eighty percent miscarriage rate.” The baseline miscarriage rate is described as one in six, and they claim it is now seven to eight times that amount. Doctor James Thorpe is cited: a “seventy nine percent increase in fetal malformations” and “unprecedented numbers of stillbirths,” alleging censorship by the mainstream media. The speaker mentions a publication titled My Cycle Story with many scientists, including Doctor Hooker, presenting a database of “over 6,000 women that came forward because their voices were being silenced.” They note about “20,000 women on Facebook” discussing menstrual experiences, including reports of severe bleeding, not mild symptoms, and that “90 year olds beginning bleeding again.” The speaker describes clots: women calling with clots passing for weeks. They reference “two VAERS cases of little girls, 18 old girls, who hemorrhaged and died,” within the My Cycle Story data. The database included “over 6,000 women,” and they looked at the baseline rate of decidual cast shedding (the uterus shedding its entire inside in one piece, looking like a plaster cast). They report that in their data, it was “like two sixty nine women” who reported this. They note that most of the original database consisted of women who hadn’t even had the shot, implying the phenomenon affects coagulation pathways in the body and is not limited to vaccinated individuals. The speaker emphasizes the impact on fertility and reproductive health, warning of the potential horror for young women who “realize they will never be able to get pregnant because they had that shot.”

After receiving trial documents, a Florida doctor noticed an 80% miscarriage rate in Pfizer recipients. Her practice delivers around 300 babies annually, with a 100% increase in miscarriages post-COVID vaccine rollout. She shared her data on doctor Jessica Rose's substack in 2022, highlighting the influence of big pharma on medical schools. This was discussed on American Thought Leaders with Janik Tellek.

I am Kimberly Biss, an OBGYN in Saint Pete, Florida. Since the vaccine rollout, we have seen a 50% decrease in new OB cases (infertility), a 50% increase in miscarriages, and a 25% rise in abnormal Pap Smears and cervical malignancies in our area.

Speaker 0 asked how many of his patients or pregnant women he knows experienced miscarriages after receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Speaker 1 responded with observational data from his practice. He said that in fall of the previous year, about 60% of pregnant patients in his practice were vaccinated, which he noted is commensurate with Florida’s overall vaccination rate of about 60–65–70%. Most of his pregnant patients received three injections, with very few receiving four or more, and the majority received their injections in 2021 and early 2022. He referenced a Substack by Jessica Rose from November 2022 that presents his data pictorially, and noted that his data runs from January 2020 to November 2022. In 2020, he observed many newly registered obstetric patients (represented by blue bars for first-trimester new pregnancies). He stated there were the most deliveries, suggesting a lockdown-related effect. He then discussed miscarriage rates. He noted that standard textbooks and articles quote a normal miscarriage rate of 13–15%, but he has never seen that clinically. A 2020 study by Nairt et al. reported the actual first-trimester miscarriage rate as 5–6%, and he considers that even that to be somewhat high. He reported his own average miscarriage rate in 2020 as 4% month-to-month. He stated that his miscarriage rate from year to year increased: in 2021, the average month-to-month rate was 7–8%, with a peak in November that year, when a non-clinical staff member told him there had been eight miscarriages in a single month in a practice that delivers 20–25 patients, a “huge number.” In 2022, the average month-to-month rate rose to 15% (up to November). In December 2022, there were 41 newly registered patients, and 13 of them lost their babies, which is 25% for that month. In January and February 2023, the rate remained high, and only normalized around June, with a subsequent slight rise and fall by September. Regarding whether the miscarriages were associated with vaccination, he said it is hard to determine: he could tell that about 60% of his patients were vaccinated, but many new patients had not yet appeared in his practice, since he is the sole clinician who asks every patient about vaccination, brand, and timing, as well as prior COVID infection. He noted that asking a patient who miscarries if they received an injection could come across as accusatory, so obtaining complete data is challenging. He concluded with the observation that the information is difficult to ascertain precisely and that not wanting a patient to feel blamed complicates collecting definitive links between vaccination and miscarriage.

Research purportedly shows vaccinated men's sperm self-assembles into bizarre 3D ribbon-like structures and refuses to swim. Doctors are allegedly warning unvaccinated individuals to avoid sexual intercourse with vaccinated individuals. Demand for unvaxxed sperm reportedly climbed during the pandemic. Dr. Jane Ruby claims vaccinated sperm behaves in unprecedented ways, citing a case where sperm from a vaccinated man formed 3D structures after 30 days in saline. A Danish study allegedly found a 22% decline in motile sperm concentration from 2019-2022. Dr. Christiane Northrop reports vaccinated sperm is allegedly contaminated with nonorganic substances. Fertility clinics are purportedly seeing sperm from vaccinated men that doesn't swim, and eggs from vaccinated women that don't develop properly. An alleged New England Journal of Medicine study purportedly showed an 80% miscarriage rate for vaccinated women in their first trimester. Doctors are supposedly reporting a 79% increase in fetal malformations and unprecedented stillbirths. A study of over 6,000 women allegedly revealed menstrual cycle irregularities, including bleeding in 90-year-olds and hemorrhaging in young girls. Dr. Naomi Rolfe claims Pfizer knew about fetal damage from a document the FDA tried to hide for 75 years. This document allegedly defines exposure to the vaccine as including sexual intercourse between unvaccinated women and vaccinated men, suggesting Pfizer knew vaccinated men's semen could damage pregnancy.

The speaker claims the Shimabukuro study published in the New England Journal of Medicine on 04/21/2021, misrepresented miscarriage rates, reporting 12.6% when raw data allegedly showed 82% in women vaccinated during the first trimester. The speaker alleges conflicts of interest and misrepresentations by CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and Journal Editor in Chief Eric Rubin in publications intended to coerce pregnant women into taking vaccines. The speaker asserts that subsequent studies claiming vaccine safety during pregnancy are compromised by biased funding, institutional mandates, and threats to medical licenses. Pharmaceutical companies allegedly paid $1,060,000,000 to reviewers at leading medical journals between 2020 and 2022, corrupting the peer review process. Safety signals were allegedly ignored in at least six studies from CDC, FDA, and Pfizer. The speaker states their team published a study on 02/08/2025, identifying 37 adverse pregnancy outcomes significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccines. They cite a study documenting the vaccine traversing the placenta and producing spike protein in the placenta and uterus, and animal studies revealing destruction of ovarian reserve. The speaker urges halting funding to organizations like ACOG and SMFM and ending promotional campaigns for mRNA therapies in pregnant women.

The speaker discusses the risks of pregnancy and not giving birth to the child. Pfizer provided important data, revealing that out of 29 specific members in their study, 28 women did not have children. 23 lost their babies within the first 20 weeks, while the remaining 5 experienced stillbirth or fetal death. Only one child survived out of the 29. The speaker also mentions the number of viral particles in the mRNA vaccines, which is 40 trillion. They express concern about the potential harm to the immune system and urge people to stop taking the vaccines.

The Pfizer papers reveal an intentional attack on human sexuality, particularly targeting women and babies. The documents show they killed babies, poisoned breast milk, damaged placentas, and lowered sperm count, all while being fully aware of these consequences. There are charts detailing the injuries to babies and disruptions to women's menstrual cycles. Their research concluded that babies were dying in utero due to maternal exposure to the vaccine. This information was given to Dr. Walensky, yet she still recommended the COVID vaccine before, during, or after pregnancy. This is a satanic act on a massive scale. The Pfizer executives knew what they were doing, which is evident in the thirteen to twenty percent drop in live births. They tried to kill us, wipe us out, and sterilize us. Despite the deaths and fertility struggles, we survived, and the truth has come to light.

The speaker claims that women who received the vaccine in the first trimester had an 82% miscarriage rate. They state that this is the same miscarriage rate observed in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market analysis.

Despite it being treated as an obligation to do so, physicians reportedly do not know these facts. The speaker expresses strong frustration about the situation. The speaker cites a famous medical journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, describing a study of vaccine researchers and stating that “the 12.6 percent user rate” was reported, and that the paper claimed there was no problem with the vaccine based on that figure. Using that paper as a basis, the San Fujikawa Society or a similarly named organization promoted vaccination for pregnant women. However, the actual content of the data is described as follows: of 827 people, 700 were in the late stage of pregnancy, and 127 were in the early stage (first trimester). For the subgroup limited to those under 20 weeks’ gestation, i.e., the 127 individuals, the reported miscarriage rate was 82 percent. From this, the speaker argues that the vaccine is dangerous, given the result for the early-stage group. It is claimed that the data were hidden or obscured, and that the later report combined the late-pregnancy group of 700 with the early-pregnancy group of 127 to produce a 12.6 percent miscarriage rate, which was then published. The speaker concludes that even a major medical journal could be influenced by external financial pressures, resulting in biased reporting that supports the other side’s interests.

In a review of data from 2020 to February 2023, one speaker reports that their miscarriage rate increased by 100% from year to year. The speaker states that in 2020, the miscarriage rate in their practice was about 4% on average, then rose to 7-8% in 2021, and 15% in 2022. In February 2023, the miscarriage rate was 25% in their practice. The speaker notes a decline in newly registered first-trimester patients, suggesting possible infertility. They believe that something is happening globally, and the only global event in 2021 was the introduction of injections. Approximately 65-70% of Floridians received at least two injections, according to CDC data. In February 2022, 65% of the speaker's pregnant patients had at least two injections. The speaker believes these injections should be considered category X and are dangerous for pregnant women, citing FOIA request information indicating harm and no benefit.

The speaker discusses a New England Journal of Medicine study from April 21, 2021, and an accompanying op-ed by Eric Rubin, Stephen Morrissey, and Rochelle Walensky, alleging they made false and fear-mongering statements about the risks to pregnant women, unborn children, and newborns if they didn't get vaccinated. This was allegedly done despite evidence suggesting pregnancy reduced maternal mortality and data showing the COVID-19 vaccine was the deadliest and most injurious vaccine ever released. The speaker claims the study, authored by 21 federal employees including Tom Shimabukuro, was biased. Out of 827 pregnant women in the study, they highlight a claimed miscarriage rate of 12.6%, which they argue is abnormally high compared to the normal rate of 3% at a normal booking visit. They allege that 700 of the women received the vaccine in their third trimester, but were artificially placed in the first trimester data. This allegedly skewed the miscarriage rate for women vaccinated in the first trimester to 82%, which is the same miscarriage rate seen in the Pfizer post-market data.

Speaker 0 explains that even the obstetrics and gynecology association has reportedly pushed to vaccinate pregnant women as a duty, but doctors are the ones who do not know the facts. They reference a highly regarded medical journal, the New England Journal of Medicine, which published a study claiming a 12.6 percent user rate for the vaccine’s research results. Based on that paper, the 三 富 士 川 学 会 then attempted to vaccinate pregnant women. In reality, among the 827 individuals involved, 700 were in the postpartum period, 127 were in the antepartum period, and initial data were from that group. Specifically, for the group limited to those under twenty weeks (twenty weeks or less), which is 127 people, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. Therefore, the argument is that, going forward, one can see how dangerous the vaccine is from those numbers. The speaker contends that data were hidden and later mixed into the 700-person postpartum group, yielding a miscarriage rate of 12.6 percent. Because of this, the claim is that even a leading medical journal has been influenced by money to publish such conclusions. Overall, the points presented are: - The obstetrics field is described as advocating vaccination of pregnant women as a duty, while physicians allegedly lack awareness of the underlying facts. - The NEJM published a study deemed to show a 12.6 percent user rate, which the speaker implies is problematic. - The 三 富 士 川 学 会 vaccinated pregnant women, but the data show that among 127 women under twenty weeks, the miscarriage rate was 82 percent. - The speaker asserts that this information was hidden and later combined with data from the 700 postpartum cases to produce a 12.6 percent miscarriage rate. - The implication is that even a top medical journal can be swayed by financial influence, resulting in biased reporting.

Pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at major medical journals, allegedly corrupting the peer review process. Studies from the CDC, FDA, and Pfizer purportedly revealed major breaches in COVID-19 vaccine safety signals during pregnancy, but these findings were allegedly ignored. Independent researchers who published findings contradicting pharmaceutical industry narratives faced persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. The speaker claims this happened to them personally.

According to the speaker, now that people are getting the documents from the trials, the miscarriage rate was eighty percent in the Pfizer trials, and they knew that. Obstetrician and gynecologist Dr. Kimberly Biss observed disturbing trends in her patients after the COVID-19 genetic vaccines rolled out in 2021. She noticed her miscarriage rate from year to year had gone up by a hundred percent. She began tracking and comparing her data in real time and published her findings on doctor Jessica Rose's substack in 2022. The speaker also claims that a lot of medical schools, 50 to 60% of their money probably comes from big pharma.

I have decades of experience in high-risk obstetrics and have seen a rise in stillbirth rates, with some cases showing alarming numbers of fetal deaths and complications. The vaccine has been linked to inflammatory effects that can harm pregnancies. Despite safety monitoring systems finding no significant risks, inflammation in pregnancy can lead to serious consequences.

Pfizer documents show an 80% miscarriage rate in pregnant women. 236 out of 270 records were lost. Babies in utero were exposed to the vaccine, leading to deaths. Breast milk was poisoned by vaccine components, causing convulsions and deaths. Newborns may have air sacs between lungs and chest walls, leading to respiratory distress. Pfizer knew about this issue 2 years prior.

The speaker says that even for obstetrics and gynecology societies, vaccination during pregnancy has been pursued as a duty, but physicians do not know the actual facts. They reference the New England Journal of Medicine, a famous medical journal, where a study of a vaccine’s adverse outcomes claimed that the user rate was 12.6%. Based on that paper, the Sanpeshikawa (Sanbushikawa) Association reportedly promoted vaccination for pregnant women as well. In reality, the data were as follows: of 827 people, 700 were in late pregnancy, and 127 were in the early stages (first trimester). When restricting to the 127 people who were under 20 weeks, the usage rate was 82%. Therefore, the speaker argues that this data reveals how dangerous the vaccine is, and that the data were hidden and mixed with high-profile 700-person data to produce the 12.6% miscarriage rate that was published. This is presented as evidence of a situation where even in medical journals, information was handled to favor the other side due to money and other influences.

The Pfizer papers reveal an intentional attack on human sexuality, particularly targeting women and babies. We have evidence that they killed babies, poisoned breast milk, damaged placentas, and lowered sperm counts, and they were fully aware of these consequences. Internal charts document the injuries to babies and disruptions to women's menstrual cycles. The data indicated that babies were dying in utero due to the maternal COVID vaccine exposure. Despite this knowledge being presented to Dr. Walensky, she advised pregnant women to get vaccinated before, during, or after pregnancy. Their actions, which included a thirteen to twenty percent drop in live births, demonstrate an attempt to sterilize and eliminate us. Despite the deaths and struggles with fertility that resulted, we survived, and the truth has come to light.

Pfizer documents reveal a deliberate attack on human sexuality, particularly harming women and babies. The documents show knowledge of fetal deaths, poisoned breast milk, placental damage, and reduced sperm counts. Charts detail the injuries to babies and disruptions to women's menstrual cycles. Despite this, recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy were issued. This was a massive, satanic act. The 13-20% drop in live births proves they knew the consequences. They attempted to kill and sterilize us. Many died, and fertility struggles will continue, but we survived, and the truth is out.

Pregnant women who received COVID-19 shots experienced concerning effects, according to maternal fetal medicine expert Dr. Against Thorpe. The shots quickly spread throughout the body, crossing barriers like the placenta and blood-brain barriers in both the mother and fetus. Compared to the flu vaccine, COVID-19 shots led to more adverse events in women of reproductive age. Data showed a 27-fold higher risk of miscarriage and over twice the risk of negative fetal outcomes across six categories. Additionally, birth rates in several European countries dropped significantly after widespread COVID-19 vaccination. As a result, researchers are urging the immediate suspension of COVID-19 vaccination for individuals of childbearing and reproductive age.

Dr. Biss, an experienced OBGYN, discusses the potential effects of COVID-19 vaccines on women's reproductive health. He mentions that there have been reports of changes in menstrual cycles and postmenopausal bleeding in vaccinated women. Some women experienced a condition called passing a decidual cast, where the uterine lining sheds all at once, causing intense pain and hemorrhaging. Dr. Biss also notes that premature ovarian failure and abnormal bleeding patterns were observed in some women who received the vaccine early in their menstrual cycle. Regarding miscarriages, Dr. Biss shares that his practice saw an increase in miscarriage rates in vaccinated patients, but it is challenging to determine the exact correlation between vaccines and miscarriages due to limited data. The majority of his patients received the Pfizer vaccine.

Dr. James Thorpe, a board-certified maternal fetal medicine and OBGYN physician, discusses the concerning increase in pregnancy complications such as miscarriage, infertility, fetal anomalies, and chromosomal abnormalities. He presents data showing the high number of deaths associated with a drug that was rolled out despite being known as the most dangerous in medical history. Dr. Thorpe reveals that the Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, FDA, and medical boards were aware of the risks but chose to bury the information due to financial interests. He emphasizes that using novel substances in pregnancy goes against the golden rule of medicine and highlights the catastrophic problems caused by this drug. The American College of OB GYN's narrative is driven by financial motives, as they would have to repay millions of dollars if they change their stance.

On COVID, there's a perception that credit isn't given where it's due. While the vaccines were developed quickly, they don't prevent infection or transmission and may have serious side effects. In hindsight, would anything be done differently? Studies on the vaccines are ongoing, and results will emerge over time. It's important to note that Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women, but reports indicated that over half of the 458 pregnant women who received the vaccine experienced adverse events. The ongoing studies will help clarify these concerns.