TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Bobby denies being the person in the video doing the chicken dance on a night vision camera.

I posted a picture with Mr. Grosskreutz on Facebook, but the caption about him regretting not killing someone was not true. I made the post due to threats I received online and to defend my friend. I apologize for the false statement.

Swiper did no swiping. Diddy didn't diddle. There are five lights. Ben Shapiro is five foot nine. Islam is a religion of peace. Trump's skin color is natural. Obama is 100% straight. Jews don't control the weather. The government is highly efficient. Cholesterol is bad for you. The dress is white and gold. We have always been at war with East Asia. Admiral Rachel Levine is definitely a woman.

The transcript centers on a critical clash over Candace Owens, TP USA, and allegations surrounding Charlie Kirk’s murder investigation, focusing on Fort Huachuca, alleged alibis, and competing narratives presented by Candace Owens and her critics. - The speaker positions himself as having known and supported Candace Owens for ten years, but challenges her latest claims, calling them “ridiculous gaslighting” and “nonsense,” and promises to lay out the facts and where they land. - The ongoing dispute involves “Egyptian planes,” a “latest so-called witness and whistleblower,” Mitch Snow, and a broader question about possible foreign or domestic involvement in Charlie Kirk’s murder, which is tied to a Fort Huachuca narrative. - Mitch Snow is alleged to have claimed that he saw Brian Harpole leaving a meeting at Fort Huachuca on September 9, and also claimed that Erica Kirk was at Fort Huachuca the night before, at Candlewood Inn and Suites. Owens had hosted Snow’s claims as part of her investigation, and the speaker had previously advised Candace to check alibis. - Candace Owens’ supporters and surrogates allegedly attacked the speaker after he questioned the alibis; he persisted in investigating, noting that the Fort Huachuca storyline had “completely blown up” with those alibis. - The narrative shifts to Erica Kirk, with Owens stating she had claimed she did not say the military was involved and did not implicate TP USA, despite compilations of past statements suggesting otherwise. The speaker contends Owens moved the goalposts multiple times and used the Fort Huachuca angle as a distraction from a prior Egyptian plane storyline. - The speaker asserts exclusive access to HD screenshots from Andrew Colvin, the TP USA spokesperson, which purportedly show that Owens’ depiction of Andrew Colvin’s involvement in “secret damage control” is a fraud. He claims to reveal that Colvin was coordinating with Paramount Tactical, not Owens directly, and that Colvin reached out to Owens’ team with alibi requests regarding Erica Kirk. - A key incident involves a screenshot and a time-stamped image Erica Kirk allegedly sent to Colvin showing her with her kids at 08:33, purportedly from Phoenix, which Owens used as part of her alibi apparatus. The speaker presents this as evidence that Colvin’s communications were not a cover-up but a regular PR exercise, and that Owens used the image to claim a broader conspiracy. - The speaker narrates a back-and-forth where Colvin allegedly provided an alibi for Erica Kirk; he shows that Kirk sent photos from a park and home, and Colvin responded three hours later, asking not to display the photo publicly but to acknowledge the proof. Owens denies the alibi and reframes it as desperate behavior by TP USA. - The discussion expands to broader personnel and planes-related details: an undersecretary of the army allegedly went to Fort Huachuca on the eighth; a defense department border inspection visit is cited as context for why Fort Huachuca is significant. The speaker emphasizes that the focus should be on the ninth and the alleged base alibis, not the eighth. - The speaker accuses Owens of simulating a “gaslighting operation” and notes that she has discredited alibis by shifting attention to new claims; he maintains that the “ninth” is the core question, not the earlier Fort Huachuca references. - The narrative includes a conflict with commentators such as Alex Jones, Charlie Kirk, and The Daily Wire, and alleges that Owens’ circle has manipulated public perception to undermine TP USA and Charlie Kirk. - The speaker concludes with a denunciation of Owens’ tactics, insisting that the public should focus on the Charlie Kirk murder case and its true facts, while alleging Owens uses a pattern of deception, moving from one narrative to another to distract from the nine’s alleged details. He calls for prayer for Candace Owens and urges supporters to consider the broader battle against perceived globalist manipulation; he also frames this as a spiritual or existential conflict in which truth is being contested. Note: Promotional or advertising content included toward the end of the original transcript has been omitted.

The speaker discusses Erica Kirk and a sequence of variant names connected to her. They begin by asserting familiarity with Erica Kirk and then pivot to a narrative about Erica Fransve (her birth name) and Erica Kirk (the name after marrying Charlie in 2020). The central question posed is: who is Erica Chelsvig? Key claims and sequence: - Erica Fransveig was her maiden name; Erica Kirk was her name after marrying Charlie in 2020; Erica Chelsvig is described as a name she supposedly bore at another point in time. - The speaker asserts they learned the name Erica Chelsvig only two days after Charlie Kirk’s funeral, after being awakened at 02:30 in the morning. - They claim to have been a large Erica Kirk fan prior to this discovery, and that the “truth” about Erica Chelsvig had emerged suddenly and unexpectedly. - The speaker alleges that information about Erica Chelsvig has “officially scrubbed from the Internet” the very next day, and that only the speaker’s aunt managed to discover and retain it. - They state that, despite being on vacation, the world will learn who Erica Chelsvig is, but not via a Google search. - The speaker asks, “So who is Erica Chelsvig auntie?” and then outlines a backstory: Erica Fransveig (maiden name); Erica Kirk (name after marriage); Erica Chelsvig (name in between, or at another point). - They note that the Chelsvig name is Romanian and remark on the odds of that, calling the world an evil place and suggesting not everything is what it seems. - The speaker claims that Erica Kirk, Gronzevay, Chelsbank, formerly, is “accidentally spilling the beans one by one,” and asserts that what is done in the dark will come to light. - They emphasize their belief that the truth is true when it needs to be scrubbed from the Internet, and question why it would be scrubbed if there wasn’t something to hide. - A further variation is mentioned: “Erica Kerr, formerly Chelsvig,” and with it, a prompt to “screenshot and read the rest” while on vacation. - The speaker reiterates that “what used to be on the Internet” was removed days after Charlie’s funeral, and that when the holy spirit speaks, you listen and you screenshot, and the truth will always come to life.

The speaker asserts that emails repeatedly referenced Comet Ping Pong, a Washington DC pizza place run by James Alifontis (the speaker refuses to call him a man). Alifontis is described as a local pizza shop owner, art gallery owner, and founder of several other restaurants, but the speaker argues this is only a surface description. The speaker highlights alleged connections: Alifontis allegedly has powerful friends, evidenced by Instagram posts showing personal letters from Hillary Clinton, campaign rally photos, and Obama supposedly playing ping pong with a child. The speaker claims there are photos of Alifontis with Podesta, including one where Alifontis holds a pizza pool floaty with a creepy silhouette of a female behind them. The speaker describes an archive of Alifontis’s Instagram, claimed to include p*rnographic images and adults with pizza covering their genitals, as well as disturbing photos of children, including a blurred image of a five-year-old girl allegedly his niece with her hands taped to a ping pong table, captioned “chickenlover.” The speaker questions why Alifontis wasn’t banned from Instagram and notes that Alifontis is supposedly close to many people tied to the emails. The pizza shop is presented as central to a broader network of alleged wrongdoing, and the speaker argues there are non-coincidental links among the people involved. The speaker notes Alifontis’s Instagram shows a statue of Antinous, described as Hadrian’s lover who was a boy, with a history of a relationship from preteen to death at 18 or 19, and claims Hadrian created a cult around Antinous after his death. The speaker connects this to alleged child exploitation and questions the profile-picture choice in relation to those involved. They compare Epstein to Alifontis, pointing to child imagery, connections to powerful people, and wealth. The discussion shifts to a 2012 GQ list of the 50 most powerful people in Washington, where the speaker claims Alifontis appears at number 49, implying influence beyond a small business footprint. The speaker then asserts a well-known romantic connection between Alifontis and David Brock, founder of Media Matters, a left-leaning watchdog group. Media Matters is described as monitoring right-leaning media, producing content to counter narratives, and allegedly influencing which news is considered legitimate. The speaker mentions that Media Matters has faced defamation lawsuits and investigations for fraudulent activity, including being sued by the Texas attorney general and the Missouri attorney general, and notes funding from George Soros and Bill Clinton, who allegedly provided office space at the Center for American Progress, a think tank associated with John Podesta. The cycle of connections is described as widening to include Hillary Clinton, the Podestas, and others, forming a circle of familiar faces tied to the emails and to Alifontis. The speaker argues that Alifontis posts images of selling children on his Instagram and connects this to the Comet Ping Pong restaurant, suggesting a broader pattern of wrongdoing. Back at the venue, the speaker cites FBI imagery and symbols appearing in Comet Ping Pong materials, including two ping pong paddles on the menus that resemble the “child lover” image from the FBI’s alerts. Murals at Comet Ping Pong allegedly depict adults, some unclothed, parading children or heads of children, and one humanoid figure wearing a crown. The bathrooms allegedly contain graphic graffiti, and the musical acts Heavy Breathing and Xtains are described as featuring disturbing imagery, including a scene in Heavy Breathing’s video that includes dialogue suggesting someone named Bram72 and a character named MajesticApe29; MajesticApe is rumored to be James Alifontis. A band named Stains is described as having a song with imagery akin to MK Ultra nightmares, and a box in the video reportedly mirrors the FBI’s “boy lover” symbol. The speaker references an online video from 2007 titled Ping Pong in a Public Place showing two men playing ping pong, with disturbing audio of a child begging for help, implying missing children may be connected to the location. The speaker notes nearby establishments—Besta Pizza and Beyond Borders Across the Street—whose logos allegedly resemble FBI symbols, further claiming a pattern of coincidences. The discussion shifts to a rumored server hosted in a backroom on the Comet Ping Pong site, with encrypted video files and password-protected pages discovered after the gate broke, suggesting that someone is actively keeping content hidden. In summary, the speaker contends that Comet Ping Pong, James Alifontis, and a network of powerful political and media figures form a troubling web tied to alleged child exploitation, with imagery, music, and online content serving as corroborating indicators, while asserting that a backroom server allegedly hosted encrypted videos connected to the venue.

"So this Charlie Kirk story just keeps getting weirder and winter." "we're supposed to believe that some random trans shooter was on the roof" "and then you tell me that he runs roughly one mile with a long arm rifle in broad daylight to stash it in the woods." "if he left with a weapon and hid it in the woods, then why didn't he have it on him when he was leaving?" "He even had an American flag shirt on." "I can't wrap my head around that." "And now the FBI with all their resources, that's the best photo that they can give us?" "Didn't we watch criminal minds as a kid?" "The BAU to, like, rerender that image and get it pixel perfect and go, yep. That's him." "Face recognition software. Match on the nose, ears, Boom. There he is." "This is weird, guys. This is freaking weird."

The exchange centers on whether the person being spoken to is the author of a controversial social media post and on whether authorities should press for a response. The conversation begins with an attempt to verify the person’s identity: “Picture to make sure it's you. We're not sure.” The responding party, referred to as Speaker 0, declines to answer without his lawyer present, stating, “I refuse to answer questions without my lawyer present. So I really don't know how to answer that question either.” He emphasizes his stance with a nod to freedom of speech, saying, “Well, you're like I said, you're not gonna is freedom of speech. This is America. Right? Veteran. Alright. And I agree with you 100%.” The officers explain they are trying to identify the correct person to speak with and proceed with the inquiry. Speaker 1 presents the substance of the post in question: “the guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians tried to shut down a theater for showing a movie that hurt his feelings and refuses to stand up for the LGBTQ community in any way, Even leave the room when they vote and on related matters. Wants you to know that you're all welcome clown face clown face clown face.” They ask Speaker 0 if that post was authored by him. Speaker 0 again refuses to confirm, stating, “I’m not gonna answer whether that’s me or not.” The discussion shifts to the underlying concern. Speaker 1 clarifies that their goal is not to establish whether the post is true, but to prevent somebody else from being agitated or agreeing with the statement. They quote the line about “the guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians” and note that such a post “can probably incite somebody to do something radical.” The purpose of the inquiry, they say, is to obtain Speaker 0’s side of the story and to address the potential impact of the post. Speaker 1 urges Speaker 0 to refrain from posting statements like that because they could provoke actions. Speaker 0 expresses appreciation for the outreach, but reiterates that he will maintain his amendment rights to not answer the question. He concludes by acknowledging the interaction and affirming that the conversation ends there: “That is it. And we're gonna maintain my amendment rights to, not answer the question about whether or that's fine.” Both parties part on a courteous note, with Speaker 0 thanking them and wishing them well.

The speaker was at AFPAC and is called a general in the movement and one of Nick's trusted lieutenants. He claims he's just friends with Nick. The speaker mentions someone sent him fake feet pics on Snapchat and he doesn't need to reverse image search because he's already seen them. He says he's tired and will stay up longer if people donate. Another speaker asks why he hasn't skipped the feet pics if he doesn't want to see them. A final speaker says that if he ever sees Britney, he's going to rape her in person and cut his dick in her asshole. He says she doesn't understand the community she's involved in and will be anally raped for it.

- The discussion opens with a hypothetical plan about obtaining and examining the Anthony Weiner laptop, suggesting it contains prosecutable material and noting that New York police officers who viewed parts of it reportedly “had to go throw up.” - Speaker 1 then shifts to a reveal about Anthony Bourdain, ABC’s Bob Woodruff, and a shift away from debunked conspiracies to focus on James Alifantis, a DC figure described as an art collector, fundraiser, and owner of venues including Comet Ping Pong. He is noted as being personally thanked by Hillary Clinton for “extraordinary talent” during a Podesta fundraiser and pictured with Tony Podesta; his past boyfriend is identified as David Brock of Media Matters. Alifantis is described as having influenced donors including Pete Buttigieg, according to the Federal Election Commission. The speaker raises questions about why Alifantis would be equated with pedophilia. - Speaker 2 begins a first-hand account from December 17, with JB recounting James Alifantis’s connection to St. Albans in DC and Greenwood. The retelling includes an accusation that Alifantis walked in seeking a job and, in a separate claim, that he sexually abused an 11-year-old boy in the kitchen, with the boy (Dylan Greenwood) later reportedly committing suicide about two years prior. The account alleges underground rooms at Comet Ping Pong and tunnels to other buildings, including one possibly owned by the Clinton Foundation, and asserts the tunnels extend in the area, potentially reaching multiple locations. The speaker says Alifantis was attempting to obtain a manager job. There is also a suggestion that Alifantis earned money by trafficking children and that tunnels connect to other sites near Comet Ping Pong, including a place “across the street.” The speaker ends by indicating willingness to post these claims as “primary source” information. - Speaker 1 then notes bands associated with Comet Ping Pong and references members such as Amanda Kleinman of Heavy Breathing, as well as the DC punk group Loud Boys and the song “The Sextanes,” with insinuations about pedophilia in some audience members. They describe Comet Ping Pong as a family restaurant with a backroom for children’s birthdays. - The discussion references a 2007 FBI bulletin noting a blue spiral-shaped triangle symbol used by predators, reportedly etched into coins and rings, and connects this to the venue’s events and music videos by The Sextanes. It is claimed that Alifantis’s Instagram showed Antinous, a Greek emperor associated with a modern cult of LGBT polytheists; Antinous is described as a prominent symbol in pederastic culture. The claim is also made that Alifantis has no children, yet posts many images of children on Instagram, some stated to be taken from friends’ and family members’ pages. - The transcript lists various images and hashtags associated with Alifantis, including references to Panda Head Morgan, Panda Head Magazine, and a video describing Cultpanda. Specific images allegedly include a goddaughter with taped arms, a baby in an art gallery, and a baby doll image, with censorship of certain ambiguous images. The speaker alleges connections to people like Scott Cummings (owner of Portland Natural Casket Company) and notes tattoos and death-related imagery. - There are additional posts and comments linked to Alifantis’s social media, including a post about a “Miss Summer Camp” with sexualized captions, and comments referencing “let’s hang a baby,” “I put my baby in a slow cooker,” and other disturbing captions. A commenter group includes “Pizza F***ing Party,” who posted images of children with condoms, coins, vials of alcohol, a pentagram, a “Baby Doll Pizza” logo from a Portland restaurant, and a claim that Portland, Oregon is linked to alleged trafficking. A witness, Michael Whelan, is cited as a Portland resident who claims to have seen illicit activity involving Voodoo Doughnuts. The speaker questions why such activities would occur in Portland, asking why children are being taken to the back, and remarks that survivors would recognize such behavior as flaunted and protected. - The dialogue ends with a reiteration of the Voodoo Doughnuts reference and the question of why there is alleged abuse of children, noting that perpetrators appear to act with impunity.

I'm Gavin Newsom, and I'm not gay. Critics are upset about my ban on AI-generated political videos. The issue is that many Democrats struggle to differentiate between reality and fiction. For instance, I mistook a parody video for reality. Without regulations, how can we discern truth? If we don't ban misleading AI videos, we might believe false narratives about Trump, Hunter Biden, and various political events. We need to protect our understanding of issues like inflation, COVID, and gender identity. These parodies pose a threat to democracy by spreading disinformation, unlike the factual information we provide. And, just to reiterate, I'm definitely not gay.

Bobby, it's your favorite president here. I forgive you for being a loser about the election results. It's not your fault you have a low IQ. Believe me, I won, and Kamala lost big time. You were wrong. You're a total loser, and your show sucks. You're going to get low ratings. It's a disgrace to go from raging gold to raging nobody. It's a horror. Kamala's probably getting drunk somewhere, the f***ing virgin. Can you believe this guy calling your favorite president a virgin? Look at that crowd; it's a disgrace. But don't worry, we already won big. Come here, paparazzi! I love this guy. Do you want to do a little dance?

James O’Keefe confronts Garcia’s office over Epstein photos. O’Keefe says, “You guys said that you you had Epstein photos that you you broke, and we actually broke it already. You redacted some of the stuff on the chalkboard. We we broke the story in May.” Garcia staff counters, “We stand by our story. We put out information that is not included in your photo, so we did include photos that were not. But thank you so much for coming.” O’Keefe asks why the words on the chalkboard were redacted; staff replies they “go above and beyond to make sure that we protect any victims or potential victims.” O’Keefe notes they “broke the exact same photo.” The staff asserts they have many photos O’Keefe did not, and they “included photos that did not have” what O’Keefe released. O’Keefe presses for credit; staff says, “Absolutely not,” and claims, “we put out photos that were never before seen.” The source allegedly is the US Virgin Islands, “with response to a request from Congress.” O’Keefe says he has his own sources and asks for attribution. The staff accuses O’Keefe of “selectively editing videos” and of a broader reputation for filming people without their permission, stating, “That’s your reputation, and that’s why people don’t trust you.” O’Keefe challenges with, “Can you give me an example of how I’ve edited a video selectively?” The staff responds that Project Veritas’ reputation preceded him and declines to provide an example, saying they don’t want to speak to his audience and that he has a “reputation for filming people without consent selectively editing.” The exchange grows heated; O’Keefe asserts he is here as a member of Congress in Garcia’s office and asks for fair treatment. The staff reiterates, “Photos that you haven't put out. We said we were putting out photos that are never before seen. We did that. We did not lie at all.” O’Keefe highlights that he and Garcia’s office have “kicked out here” and describes the interaction as elitist and condescending. He references a quote idea about perception versus reality, then notes they “broke” an image where Democrats in House Oversight claim they broke it, and mentions that one word redacted was “dank or dark brain,” questioning which victim that protects. He promises to seek a retraction and signs off: “This is James O’Keeffe. You know me for exposing the truth and holding the corrupt elite responsible and accountable.” The interaction ends with the two sides firm in their positions, and O’Keefe walks away after being asked to leave, with Garcia’s staff maintaining their reporting and accuracy, while O’Keefe frames the encounter as a confrontation over credibility and transparency.

The discussion centers on allegations that Erica Kirk’s backstory has been exposed as a lie. The speakers claim that, while she lived in New York, there are indications she did date and drink, contrasting with statements that she avoided dating and did not drink. One concrete example cited is a photo of Erica Fronsbee with a glass of champagne, captioned “it’s Wednesday, so treat yourself to little champagne,” suggesting she did enjoy alcohol. Further evidence presented includes a 2017 image posted by internet sleuths showing Erica Fronsbee with Cabot Phillips, captioned, “yes. we’re that couple who gets painting lessons together.” The image is interpreted as indicating they were more than just a one-off date, implying they were an actual couple. The speakers note that Cabot Phillips was at one point Charlie Kirk’s producer and is now a senior editor at The Daily Wire. They add that Phillips recently spoke about “how to lead like Charlie,” and that the speaker believes Phillips “is not from this world of media,” describing the situation as “incestuity.” The narrative is broadened to claim that Erica was dating before Charlie, which is described as normal, but there is also mention of her being engaged, perhaps even married. Luna Bear Studios is cited with a post from 03/16/2015, praising Erica Fransvi and JT Massey, stating, “Erica Fransvi and JT Massey, you both are amazing humans, and I love shooting you so much laughter and love. It was perfection.” This is used to argue that her entire image is built on something not true. A recurring question posed is why Erica would lie about being a conservative woman, with the assertion that such deception would be visible online, concluding that “the Internet is undefeated.” The speakers imply that Erica’s public persona as a conservative woman is inconsistent with the alleged past relationships and activities documented in the posts and photos. The overall claim is that there are contradictions between her claimed identity and her dating and social media history, challenging the authenticity of her presented backstory.

A community I care about is hurting because of offensive posts attributed to me. Many of you have seen these blog posts online and on social media. They are homophobic, discriminatory, hateful, and weird. When a friend showed them to me in December, I was stunned because I couldn't imagine where they came from. I've spent months trying to understand these posts and hired cybersecurity experts to investigate if someone manipulated my words or my former blog. They haven't been able to prove manipulation, but I genuinely don't believe I wrote those hateful things because they are completely alien to me. I understand why some people don't believe me based on my past tweets and writings. I've been dumb, cruel, and hurtful to the people I advocate for. I own that, and I'm truly sorry.

Bobby, it's your favorite president here. I forgive you for being a loser about the election; it's not your fault you have a low IQ. Believe me, I won, Kamala lost big time. You're wrong, and you're a total loser. Your show sucks and will get low ratings. You've gone from raging bull to nobody, a disgrace. It's a horror. Kamala's probably drunk somewhere. Can you believe that guy called me the president of Virgin? Look at that crowd. It's a disgrace, but we won big, okay? Come here, paparazzi! I love this guy. Want to do a little dance? Come here.

Speaker 0: This story that's been the biggest thing on the Internet for several weeks, Pizzagate, as it's called, is a rabbit hole that is horrifying to go down. Now if you're a radio listener, this is a powerful video, but I've had it reposted because, again, he finished it, I guess, on Wednesday. It went out Thursday on the nightly news that was taped the day before. This is on infowars.com. Pizzagate is real. The only question is, what exactly is it? Because I'd said, man, I hope this is drug dealing code word or something or, you know, maybe they got the wrong manual because this is the FBI says this is this is pedophilia manuals. These are the terms they use, and then here's the New York Times. Fake news onslaught targets pizzeria as nest of child traffickers. Hey. I don't know why the pizzeria and the one down the street have symbols in the FBI dossier. I don't know why there's devil worship part of the walls. I don't know why it's connected to Potesta. I don't know why they got rock singers there talking about, you know, being you know, going after kids or whatever. This is what's going on, though. And so maybe it's just some genre they picked up. They don't know what they're involved in. I'm not accusing them of anything. Little I mean, it's not like they look like little piggy people or anything. Not like they fit all the cliches or anything when you go to the just like nice people to me, but the point is is that this is tied into Podesta with thousands of emails with, we're gonna have the six year old, the seven year old, and eight year old in the hot tub for your entertainment out at the ranch house. They can be a little persnickety, but they are also willing and enjoy it. Yeah. I mean, there's thousands of these. You're reading it going, what the hell is this? And you start reading it. There's thousands and thousands and thousands, and you know you're reading something real bad. Oh, I'll see you at the feast tonight. Oh, we'll have lots of blood and semen. Oh, good. And then they had, like, Time Magazine worshiping this high priestess the week after we exposed her about the news, all this PR, like, oh, we'll show them. They're attacking our high priestesses. We'll just put them in the news better. Like, we're all upstanding and out in the open and good people. Look. I've been careful about all this. This is lawsuit city. I don't know what the hell is going on with these people. I know straight up devil worship when I see it and find quotes of her saying it's real when she does it privately. Could he harass me anything Reddit accounts? I mean, I know real bathymen worship when I see it, but thousands of emails, I'm not ready to accuse all these people of this. It's up to you to research it for yourself, but you gotta go to infowars.com and actually see the photos and videos inside these places. You've gotta see their menus. You've gotta see it all, ladies and gentlemen, and then you gotta see the FBI law enforcement manuals showing the code words that are used. And by the way, didn't just believe this. I went to the FBI site. I went and looked it all up, and people asked, well, why weren't you on this earlier? We were on it from the beginning. We've been on it the last couple weeks since the election, but we're fighting on hundreds of fronts here. Let's go ahead and go to the report. Pizzagate is real. The question is, how real is it? What is it? Something's going on. Something's being covered up. It needs to be investigated. You just call it fake news. These are real WikiLeaks. This is real stuff going on. Here it is. Speaker 1: A warning to viewers, the following images are disturbing. This all began after WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange released hundreds of thousands of secret documents detailing a back stabbing Clinton Foundation, but it now appears the real truth Assange was leading us to was hidden between the blurred lines of Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, John Podesta's, released emails. Fast forward past John Podesta's brother, Tony's, casual email exchange with thalemic spirit cooking adherent Marina Abramovic. Rosetta Stone was needed next. A verification that high level Washington DC predatory pedophiles were using a code to communicate child sex trafficking as casually as ordering a pizza. An FBI unclassified document from WikiLeaks revealed symbols and logos used by pedophiles to identify sexual preferences to include those who sexually abuse children as well as those who produce, distribute, and trade child pornography are using various types of identification logos or symbols to recognize one another and distinguish their sexual preferences. Investigators should also be attentive to pedophilia symbols advertised on websites. During examinations of computer files, investigators should be conscious of subjects who try to conceal child pornography by labeling them with symbols instead of typical suggestive explicit names. Thus, the interest in code words. Now clues. The menu from comet ping pong. Notice the symbol of the ping pong paddles and its clever resemblance to the FBI documents symbol for child love. Alright. Hang on, New York Times. Before you declare this fake news from your ivory tower, now look at the symbol for Besta Pizza just two doors down from comet ping pong pizza, boldly using the symbol for boy lover as was recorded on the unclassified FBI document. The evidence begins to reveal that Besta Pizza and Comet Ping Pong Pizza may be competing for the lucrative Washington DC pedophile market right out in the open. Comet Ping Pong owner James Alifantis needs to explain himself, and so he did via the Hillary Clinton colluding New York Times. But so many questions remain unanswered. Why was this said by the band heavy breathing performing in comet ping pong? Speaker 0: He likes the world sounds. Demolios. And little boys. And children. Think I was his manager. Yep. We all have references. Speaker 1: Why is the art work adorning Comet Ping Pong's walls at the very least so insanely creepy, especially for a family restaurant? Why is Alifantis so close to Tony Podesta as revealed in the WikiLeaks emails? And why does mister Podesta collect questionable artwork specializing in grotesque eroticism and pedophilic images, not to mention Podesta's dabbling in what appears to be cannibalistic rituals while continuing his old friendship with convicted pedophile Dennis Hastard. Why is this man wearing an I love children shirt in this situation? Why did you write hashtag murder next to this incredibly creepy photo you posted? Why do you find it amusing that this baby is for sale? Why do you associate with this artist? Why is any of this okay? And if these code words are eventually proven to be just another method of communication, then why did the Podesta emails mention the code word pasta for either little boy or sex 78 times. Code word cheese for little girl 85 times. And what does Podesta's friend Herb mean by this statement from a Podesta email? PS. Do you think I'll do better playing dominoes on cheese than on pasta? According to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and the FBI, 460,699 children went missing in 2015 that we know of. Mister Alifantis, this isn't a witch hunt, and it isn't an attack from fake news that your boyfriend David Brock, founder of Media Matters, would have us all ignore. Either you are the unlucky victim of a fake news onslaught due to your own poorly initiated publicity or a decades old pedophile ring operating in the power hoarding shadows of Washington DC is about to be opened from your front door. John Bound for infowars.com. Speaker 0: Trump won. Hillary stole five states. Was ordered to stand down by the intelligence agencies where everything else is gonna come out on this. If you're a radio listener, you're lucky you didn't actually see the video. The art they tweet in Facebook is of children being murdered, cut in pieces, and raped by men with giant genitalia. So oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. So I don't know anymore, but that's what they're pushing. It's what they got hanging up in there, and it's what they're doing. And, I I can't go out there and investigate it myself. We've had reporters on that have been there. They say it's really creepy because, I don't have the self control to be around these type of people. So you want us to cover Pizzagate? We have covered it. We are covering it, and all I know is, god help us, we're in the hands of pure evil. We'll be right back. I'm on the show.

I've seen this photo circulating widely, and there are claims that it's photoshopped. So, I did some research. I found a family website, Reagan family dot ca, with a memorial page for Suzanne Bernier, who passed away in 2007. On this page, under "memories of Suzanne," there's the same picture being shared, showing her as a McDonald's swing manager. It's the exact same image, just altered to include Kamala's face. The left is using this as a moment to attack, but it's misleading. They're spreading falsehoods, just like Kamala.

"Charlie Kirk's assassination has deleted evidence that Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson haven't mentioned once." "This guy told the cops to arrest him so the shooter could have more time to get away." "This guy was deployed for 09/11, deployed against Obama, for George Bush, and personally worked with senators and US congressmen." "And he personally admitted it, and they wiped everything, but I downloaded it just before. George Zinn," "These donors like Manafort, Berman, Ronald Weiser, they manipulate elections, create countries, and have personally admitted to taking money from all of these countries." "Zinn, the patsy, is an example of an actor they use." "I have a full twenty seven minute video going over exactly what happened, why people like Candace Owens might be lying to you, and the archive podcast link in bio."

The speaker states they could have thrown Ali under the bus a year ago when Milo mentioned rumors, but instead asked for evidence. They didn't want to end a friendship based on hearsay. They felt it was fair to wait for proof before taking action. Speaker 1 says a screenshot Lance has has existed forever and everyone knows about it. They state Ali is gay and hits people up, including teenagers, asking for nudes. Speaker 0 agrees this is gross. They also believe it's wrong for both women and boys to use nudity or sexuality for professional gain. They think that at 15, 16, and 17, people know what they're doing, and that two things can be true at the same time.

- "Charlie Kirk break out to the comments." - "Brings a pretty good audience." - "There were some shots." - "There was just some shoot and going on here at Charlie Kirk." - "Somebody just shot here at Utah Valley State." - "One shot."

"We've all heard the vile statements that Destiny made about Charlie's life being taken from him." "But did you know that the guy who was speaking to Charlie when Charlie was unalived was a guy who was part of Destiny's Unfuck America's tour." "If you haven't heard of Unfuck America, the Unfuck America tour, look who that is, was scheduled to follow Turning Point around and counter all of Turning Point's events." "Destiny is their lead creator, and he's making these comments about Charlie and people who think like Charlie." "Everyone who works for Turning Point should get a restraining order against him immediately so that he or anyone who works for him is not allowed to show their ass up at these Turning Point events."

"You gotta just give up. It's it's gonna come out. Whatever it is, it's gonna come out. There you would have to and I wouldn't put it past you. You'd have to get rid of all of us." "You got, like, 7,000,000,000 people you've got to ethnically cleanse right now if you wanted to just forget about the Charlie Kirk story." "In 1963, when JFK was shot, people didn't watch it on TikTok." "You traumatized all of us." "We're grieving because you assassinated Charlie Kirk in front of the entire world." "If you had pretended he slipped and fell on some ice in the winter, maybe you wouldn't have this response."

- I recognized an individual and 'have taken down the cameras minute four after Charlie was shot? The back camera of all the ones when you take the front camera.' - 'I've never seen that. He's never been behind me at an event. He's never been lingering around me at an event.' - I asked about 'his presence behind Charlie' and 'the mysterious phone call ... minute three after Charlie was assassinated.' - He told me explicitly that 'they were trying something new that day. Like, it was something new. Charlie's super ambitious. And on the AV thing, they were trying something new, and they wanted to be able to feed it back instantly to Arizona.' - 'None of it makes sense to me because these events are typically livestreamed. But again, something new. Okay?'

My best friend was Jeffrey Epstein's personal chef and went on many trips to the island. If your best friend was named on the Epstein flight logs and was his personal chef, wouldn't you know? It's hard to believe they had no clue. You can tell when something is off just by looking at people's photos on Instagram. It's not difficult. They expect us to believe they had no idea, but that's a lie.