reSee.it - Related Video Feed

First Amendment attorney Mark Randazza says the First Amendment protects the right to protest by standing on the sidewalk, chanting, and holding signs, but it does not protect protesters from crimes committed while protesting. Randazza believes Metro Police acted correctly when arresting protesters for throwing rocks and blocking roads. He stated that declaring a protest unlawful to clear the streets is acceptable once protesters block roads. According to Randazza, a First Amendment violation occurs when police arrest protesters acting lawfully, which he claims is rare in Las Vegas, citing a history of tolerance for free speech. He supports all protests, regardless of the message, but says protesters should use words and signs, not block traffic. Randazza advises protesters to be arrested if necessary, invoke the amendment, remain silent, and contact a First Amendment lawyer. Metro Police made nearly 100 arrests and cited seven minors.

Do not interfere with the police during arrests. If you do, you may be arrested. Please move away to ensure a safe working environment for the officers. We encourage you to film, but give them space while they perform their duties. Our goal is to maintain a peaceful First Amendment event without criminal activity. We will only intervene if criminal acts occur or if you obstruct the police. We want to return to a safe, lawful event, so please respect the officers and allow them to do their jobs.

Go over there. Attention, please. You can protest and express yourselves from the sidewalk in the park, but please do not cross the street.

The speaker asks if there is an organizer among the group blocking the roadway. They refuse to move and are warned that they could be arrested. The speaker explains that people need to use the roadway to get to work, the airport, and hospitals. They suggest moving people out of the roadway to allow traffic to flow and have a discussion later. The group mentions their goal of Biden declaring a climate emergency. The speaker says they cannot facilitate that and suggests finding a proper avenue. The group refuses to move, and the speaker warns that they will be arrested. The speaker questions the effectiveness of blocking traffic for their cause.

A tense street confrontation unfolds with loud exchanges, accusations, and threats centered on an alleged Nazi presence and a planned conversation that escalates into threats and harassment. The participants describe a scene where neighbors are distressed and some individuals demand to know who is filming and where their car is, while others respond with hostility and accusations of Nazism. Key points: - A group argues that someone is blocking an ice vehicle and demands to see a car and its plate, calling the driver a coward. The demand to identify car owners and vehicles recurs, along with insults and aggressive language. - The group states they came out for a discussion and security, not for a fight, while others label their presence as Nazi or agitator activity. One person says, “We’re Nazis for… walking down the road,” and others insist they are there to talk, not to provoke a confrontation. - There is immediate hostility: objects are thrown, including ice blocks, and there is intermittent back-and-forth about whether the group is there for a fight or a conversation. The phrase “You’re a fucking coward” and “Get the fuck out” surfaces repeatedly. - A livestream is mentioned, with one participant asking another to be honest and accusing the other side of fascist behavior. The accused are called “Nazis” multiple times, and the livestream is referenced as part of the confrontation. - The participants claim they have been there only minutes, with remarks like “I’ve been here for maybe three minutes at the most,” and another asserts they are walking the block without saying much. - The group attempts to de-escalate by calling for police help, asking for a 911 address, and reporting that the group is being followed and that rocks or ice blocks are being thrown. They specify the location as Park Avenue and 33rd Street (moving toward 34th and Portland at times), Minneapolis. - They describe the police response as insufficient or unavailable: a dispatcher explains that officers are not able to reach the location, suggesting the group move to a different location where police can access them. There is frustration at the lack of immediate police support. - The participants report being chased, a vehicle turning onto a one-way street, and the sense of danger increases as they try to remain safe while continuing to seek police assistance. - Throughout, the speakers alternate between insisting they want a conversation and berating the other side, with repeated demands that the other group “get the fuck out.” The dialogue includes interruptions, taunts, and interruptions about who started the confrontation. - Towards the end, the participants confirm the location as 33rd Street near Park Avenue and Portland, note that police can’t reach that location, and mention a white Toyota Corolla following them. They consider moving to a different location to facilitate police assistance, and the traffic dynamics continue as they attempt to navigate the area on foot while seeking protection. In sum, the transcript details a heated, harassment-laden encounter marked by accusations of Nazism, a contested intention of dialogue versus confrontation, objects thrown, a livestream presence, and a troubling lack of timely police intervention, with the scene centered around Park Avenue and 33rd/34th Streets in Minneapolis.

Do not interfere with police during arrests; doing so may lead to your arrest. Please keep a safe distance to allow officers to work effectively. We encourage you to film the event but prioritize the safety of the officers. Our goal is to maintain a peaceful First Amendment event without criminal activity. We will only intervene if criminal acts occur or if you obstruct police operations. Let's work together to ensure a safe environment and return to a lawful event. Thank you for your cooperation.

This is incredible! Let's get everyone set up. Family first—make sure to back up behind the pole. Keep moving back, everyone. We need to stay organized. Families, gather here so we can see you. Some supporters have different opinions, but it's important to stay aware. Everyone else should stay off the street. Mark, please return to your spot in front. May I have your attention? You can protest from the sidewalk or park, but please do not cross the street. Thank you.

The New York City Police Department is instructing pedestrians to disperse and clear the way for safe traffic flow. Those who comply will not face charges, but those who refuse will be arrested and charged with disorderly conduct.

Speaker 0: In a rule of law, we should be protected from the government's immense power. The government can completely destroy us. Speaker 1: You don't even need to ask for permission, you can demonstrate. So your reaction is a bit childish. People have the right to demonstrate, especially when the government is acquiring so much power. Speaker 0: You still need to notify them? Speaker 1: Yes, you need to notify them, but even if you don't, you can still demonstrate. It's necessary, considering the measures we've taken. Demonstrating is the last line of defense for many people. It's complicated, but we can't let the police overpower peaceful protesters. It's not about political goals, I've allowed many demonstrations during the pandemic in all cities, because it's a right.

Police officers on the west side were arguing near a fountain, with one officer admitting that they were hurting innocent people and making 10 others angry for every one they removed. This suggests that both the officers and the protesters were set up for failure. There is a video of officers saying they were set up, and they repeat this multiple times. The response from the authorities came two hours later.

- Speaker 0 explains that there is a delicate balance between First Amendment rights and allowing cars to move through; protesters are not a one-way situation, and there are corridors to move traffic. As of now, theyare not enacting measures to prevent people from being in the roadway while practicing their First Amendment right, and they are asking protesters to avoid the street if possible. This could change, but currently protesters are allowed to occupy street space because they are exercising their personal right to protest, and there are ways for people to get around them. - Speaker 1 asks about past policies, recalling that during 2020 riots and after Trump’s 2016 election there were hard-line arrests for stepping off sidewalks. Speaker 0 responds that people could not be arrested for being in the street at present, and if arrests were to occur they would make an announcement; anyone who wants to leave the street can leave without arrest. This is not considered a major roadway, and there are corridors protesters provide to move traffic. - Speaker 1 asks who is making the day-to-day decisions; Speaker 2 clarifies that the decisions are made day by day, minute by minute, by our CMIC (incident commander). Speaker 1 asks for the name; Speaker 0 does not know the person by name but confirms the CMIC is in charge on site and relays information to the chief. - Speaker 1 asks whether Bob Day is involved; Speaker 0 confirms that everyone answers to the chief (Bob Day) at the end of the day, since the chief is the head of the city. Speaker 2 confirms that the mayor is at the top of the hierarchy for decisions. - Speaker 2 and Speaker 1 discuss whether if the mayor ordered protesters not to be in the street at all, the responders would carry that out and arrest accordingly, with Speaker 0 indicating they would figure out the most equitable way to do so. - Speaker 1 recalls a prior incident in Portland involving a women’s rights free speech event and expensive permits/insurance, and asks whether Antifa has a permit or insurance; Speaker 0 responds that they wouldn’t call these people Antifa and that they have not identified themselves. - A subsequent speaker (Speaker 3) interjects with a rant; the group continues with a chaotic exchange about evaluating arrests and jaywalking, with Speaker 0 and Speaker 2 discussing arrest priorities and past enforcement patterns, including reference to "jaywalking" as a focus. - Overall, the discussion centers on current policy allowing street occupation by protesters, day-to-day decision-making by the CMIC under the mayor and chief, and the potential for changing enforcement depending on instructions from city leadership.

Protests are still happening in major U.S. cities, but Speaker 0 is not seeing the same level of reporting as in the first few weeks. Speaker 1 asserts the protests are a movement and will not stop. Speaker 1 warns that the protests will continue before and after election day in November. Speaker 1 believes protestors should not let up, and neither should "we."

Two speakers discuss protecting the area's residents, innocent people, and businesses. One speaker says they are not trying to protect the government and that civilians have done nothing wrong. They state they don't want a gas station to go up. The other speaker says they are on their side as long as they are against the cops, but shouldn't bring down local businesses. One speaker suggests business owners are out with the police and that people are destroying their own neighborhood, while the government killed someone's neighbor. The other speaker says they are not affiliated with any militia and are just out there.

Today, significant progress was made in safely removing the unlawful protest from the streets. Throughout the operation, protesters were clearly informed that they must leave the area and were advised of enforcement efforts to allow them to make informed decisions. These warnings were supported by a deliberate and methodical operation using lawful and safe tactics. Officers on the ground demonstrated patience and professionalism, requiring their extensive training and experience to manage the resistance, shelving, and vitriol they faced.

The transcript presents a highly inflammatory, pro-immigration-enforcement narrative centered on recent unrest in Portland and Chicago, with broad claims about law enforcement, media, and politics. - In Portland, Kristi Noem, the secretary of homeland security, is described as visiting “Rip City,” inspecting what is framed as Antifa’s “mini confederacy,” and interacting with an undocumented migrant in a way likened to a dramatic arrest, with wording implying removal from the country. - The situation at protests is depicted as chaotic and violent, with ICE vans “busting through barricades” and targeting a fentanyl trafficker, a murder suspect, sex predators, and pedophiles “all iced in Oregon.” Protesters are accused of throwing rocks and using lasers and dye, while Democrats are described as saying it’s all “smoke and mirrors.” - Protesters are described as peaceful on the surface but with videographers behind them to create a perception of chaos; a tone is set that the media is biased, and there is contempt for mainstream outlets, including a claim that “Legacy Media doesn’t have any reporters filming the riots.” - Chief Bob Day is introduced as a police chief who is also a DEI consultant, previously working for a DEI nonprofit, and accused of coaching Antifa to avoid arrest. The narrative suggests that Day prioritizes positive media coverage and that his actions reflect a broader strategy to reimagine policing. - The piece asserts a strained relationship between people of color, police, and a broader social order, with speakers claiming that bias and racism within policing have not been adequately addressed and that challenges will increase unless something changes. - There are repeated claims that Antifa is attacking immigration officers for an extended period, while Portland is described as aiding Antifa and resisting ICE. A meeting between Kristi Noem and Bob Day is described as unfavorable to law enforcement, with Day allegedly dissatisfied by the outcome. - Chicago is portrayed similarly: federal agents’ operations are described as being hampered by a stand-down order, with a female rioter who allegedly doxxed ICE agents and rammed a car later described as extremely dangerous; prosecutors reportedly characterize the individual as dangerous, while the left is accused of prioritizing “micro confederacies” to protect alleged criminals. - The transcript ties these events to political figures and themes: mentioning Mayor Johnson and “no ICE zones,” referencing violent crime, and portraying actions by Democrats and certain judges as lenient toward criminals. A Latin King calls for a $10,000 hit on a border patrol commander. - There is a recurring narrative about the 2024-2025 political climate: immigration, crime, media bias, and political power. Claims include that illegal crossings have declined to the lowest level since 1970, that the FBI has arrested thousands in crime sweeps, and that political operatives hope to deploy troops to polling places to “protect the vote.” - The piece ends with criticisms of Kristi Noem and others, accusing them of sensationalism and of inciting actions, and portraying discussions about immigration and policing as deeply adversarial, with calls for stronger enforcement and political maneuvering to influence elections.

Speaker 0 notes there is an ice facility nearby, about 200 feet away, and asks if they are staying overnight. Speaker 1 says they have to, because people from the other side, described as MAGA chuds, have set things on fire with people sleeping inside. Speaker 0 asks what a “chud” is; Speaker 1 says it means MAGA, just another word. Speaker 1 describes their area as a community space that provides snacks, water, and things for folks who are out protesting and “fighting the good fight.” Speaker 0 asks if this is their group or volunteers dropping things off; Speaker 1 says it is a community effort, with nothing funded by anyone but the community trying to support itself. Speaker 0 asks about the sidewalk protest site and whether they have had trouble with Portland police. Speaker 1 confirms police have come by a few times. Speaker 0 mentions they have written permission from the school to be on the sidewalk, asking what kind of school it is. Speaker 1 explains it used to be an elementary school but had to close and move because of chemical munitions that were “poisoning the earth.” Speaker 1 adds that last night, tear gas was deployed four or five blocks away, not because anyone attacked or used force, but “they wanted a photo op,” causing the area to shut down. Speaker 0 asks if tear gas would be deployed if demonstrations weren’t happening. Speaker 1 deflects but reiterates the need to fight the good fight because people are being kidnapped and taken. Speaker 0 asks how long they expect the demonstrations to last and what they do with tear gas. Speaker 1 replies that they are one of the medics on the ground, and that Speaker 1 received training in California when they were there, not with a job but through school. Speaker 1 now provides medical services to those in need, noting many do not receive medical care and that some people on the ground die while others pass by without helping. Speaker 0 observes this as a sad thing in Portland. Speaker 1 questions what people think about liberals, calling it another word for capitalist, and states that people confuse liberals with the left. Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss that people deserve to be taken care of, criticizing the system for failing to provide housing despite having more houses than people, with many living on the street because they can’t access it, and noting that the system continues to fail people and they continue to slide through the cracks.

Against Americans. Alright. Everyone. Give them the ropes. Pedestrians will move outside the road or you'll be arrested for impeding. All pedestrians will move outside the road now. Give us your hands. Give us your hands over.

This is incredible! Let's get started. Family first—everyone back up behind the pole, please. We need to keep a clear area. Families, gather here. Some supporters are present, but not everyone shares the same feelings. Please stay aware and keep off the street. Mark, return to your spot. May I have your attention? You can express your views from the sidewalk and park, but please do not cross the street. Thank you.

There is a feeling that something is about to happen, with the National Guard present near the Federal Building. No local police are visible at the intersection. People are handing out masks and gas masks. Individuals are seen doing graffiti and burnouts in the street. LAPD officers are staged on the other side of the fence of the building, blocking the freeway overpass to prevent protesters from throwing objects onto law enforcement below, as occurred the previous day. Masks are being handed out, specifically "bionic shield" masks. The distribution of these masks suggests that individuals plan to remain in the area for an extended period.

A reporter describes a scene with the National Guard present but no local police visible at the intersection. People are handing out masks and gas masks, and some are seen graffitiing and doing burnouts. Another speaker clarifies that many LAPD officers are staged on the other side of the fence of the building, blocking the freeway overpass to prevent protesters from throwing objects onto law enforcement below, as occurred the previous day. A third speaker notes the brand of mask being distributed, a "bionic shield," suggesting the distributors plan to remain for an extended period.

Authorities instruct targeted arrests for an assault and warn that 'Don't interfere with officers. If you interfere with officers, you may be subject to arrest or use of force.' They tell people to leave: 'Leave with people. Alright? If you did hot shit, get out. Come back tomorrow. You're better, way more, way more effective outside of a prison cell. If you did hot shit, leave.' Officers are ordered to move traffic off public ways: 'You are ordered to move to the sidewalk.' A responder says, 'We're on it.' The scene ends with a hostile shout: 'Hey. Quit smiling, fuck boy. Fuck you. Fuck Fuck Fuck you. You. You.'

Speaker 0 emphasizes that everyone should learn how to behave in the city, with a specific focus on downtown and Fountain Square. He warns that officers will approach individuals if they start to behave disorderly on Fountain Square, noting that minor altercations can evolve into something bigger. He adds that people should not come downtown, especially to Fountain Square, if they do not know how to behave. He then shifts to a topic about social media and journalism and the role they play in the incident. He points out that social media posts, and by extension some mainstream media coverage, do not depict the entire incident and represent only one version of what occurred. He states that social media and media commentary are often a misrepresentation of the circumstances surrounding events. This misrepresentation, he explains, causes difficulties in thoroughly investigating the activity and in enforcing the law. Speaker 1 asks two questions. First, he asks where the nearest officers were. Speaker 0 answers that the officers were in the central business section, working and in vehicles, and they had to maneuver through traffic. Second, he asks what exactly was distorted by social media and news coverage, acknowledging there were multiple views of the video but seeking specifics on what was distorted. Speaker 0 responds by saying that irresponsibility with social media shows one side of the equation frequently, without context and without factual context, and then people run with that content, which grows legs and becomes something bigger that the investigation must manage. In summary, the speakers stress that behavior in downtown areas, particularly Fountain Square, is regulated and subject to officer intervention if disorder arises. They critique social media and some press coverage for presenting only partial or context-free versions of events, which can hinder investigation and law enforcement. The dialogue confirms that the officers were present in the central business district, in vehicles, and dealing with traffic while addressing the incident, and it highlights the challenge of ensuring complete and contextualized information in public discourse surrounding events.

People are pepper spraying and throwing things in the streets. They are blocking ICE and the FBI from coming through.