reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Maxwell provided no evidence to support the case against the attorney general of Texas, despite 17 lawyers working on it for months. The lack of evidence led to assumptions and a failed attempt to impeach the attorney general. Lobbyists and disgruntled ex-staffers got involved, spending millions of dollars to try and remove him from office. However, their efforts were in vain. The speaker urges the audience to side with the 4.2 million Texans who elected the attorney general and vote not guilty.

Speaker 0 gave the FBI a thumb drive containing 29 minutes of high-definition video showing two men attacking a building. As of this morning, neither man has been arrested. Speaker 0 states that despite going through over 725 indictments, none of their video or even a single still picture of either man has appeared on the Internet. The FBI is allegedly refusing to take Speaker 0's calls, return emails, or accept an offer to meet. Speaker 0 believes the FBI is hiding these men. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to inquire about the identities of these men. Speaker 0 confirms that Ben Grundler has all this information and that they have been in contact for over a year.

The DOJ leaked allegations against Matt Gaetz, claiming he was involved in child sex trafficking. They have a legal obligation to charge him and prove it in court; otherwise, they should remain silent. Instead, they allowed the accusations to circulate, with media figures amplifying the claims. The DOJ admitted they lack evidence to support these allegations, yet they still spread the story. Gaetz denies the accusations, asserting they are false, but there’s no acknowledgment from the DOJ that these claims have been disproven.

The speaker admits to reporting the attorney general to the FBI without evidence of any criminal activity. When questioned about this, the speaker avoids directly answering and instead emphasizes their "good faith belief" that a crime had occurred. They also claim to have not collected any evidence after making the complaint. The questioning becomes tense as the speaker is repeatedly asked if they had any evidence to support their claims, but they continue to evade a direct answer.

The speaker claims that there was a scandal where their campaign was spied on, but the other person disagrees and says there is no evidence. The speaker insists that there is evidence everywhere and wants it to be put on the show. The other person explains that they can't put on unverified information. The speaker continues to assert that their campaign was spied on and that it was caught. They accuse the other person of knowing this but not wanting to acknowledge it. The other person denies knowing anything about it.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they gained any evidence after a certain point, to which Speaker 1 responds that they weren't collecting evidence. Speaker 0 then questions if they should be able to recall such information. Speaker 1 clarifies that they presented themselves as witnesses, not investigators, when they approached the FBI. Speaker 0 suggests that they made a complaint without evidence, and Speaker 1 disagrees, stating that they believed a crime had occurred in good faith. Speaker 0 interrupts and asks why they didn't talk to Ken Paxton, but Speaker 2 requests that Speaker 1 be allowed to finish answering. The transcript ends.

A second assassination attempt occurred in Florida against President Donald Trump, surprising many due to its proximity to a previous incident. This raised demands for a transparent investigation. As Florida's attorney general, I was involved in pursuing this investigation, but faced significant obstacles from federal law enforcement, particularly the FBI. They restricted access to the crime scene, withheld evidence, and suggested that our investigation would violate the law, despite the serious implications of the attempt, including the near-death of a six-year-old girl. Frustrated by these challenges, I had to sue the DOJ and Merrick Garland to assert our right to investigate and prosecute the matter under our state laws.

Speaker 0 confesses in a video that they were paid to pretend to protest at the Capitol building. They mention having difficulty pulling off the act and getting a bruise on their leg. Although they don't reveal who paid them, they mention it was part of an organized effort.

The speaker states they have referred documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate potential criminal implications, including those for former President Obama. According to the speaker, evidence directly points to President Obama leading the manufacturing of an intelligence assessment. The speaker claims there are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence confirming this.

Speaker 0 claims 120,000 fake ballots were scanned in Delaware County, and observers were kept out of canvassing rooms. She alleges 47 USB sticks were "lost" and then found, containing the necessary votes. Delaware County was the last to provide its information to the state. Speaker 1 states Bill Barr said there was no voter fraud based on reports from US attorneys and testified similarly to the January 6th committee. Speaker 1 asks if Bill McSwain knew about the Delaware County information from Greg Stentrum and wanted to hold a press conference about it. Speaker 0 confirms Greg contacted McSwain on November 7th, and they sent a certified letter to McSwain, Josh Shapiro, and Jack Stohlzheimer demanding an investigation into Delaware County. Shapiro allegedly sent special agents to their homes on November 17, 2020, to investigate them, not election fraud.

On September 30th, the speaker and their group went to the FBI to report the state's elected attorney general for a crime. However, they admitted that they did not have any evidence to support their claim.

The speaker accuses the attorney general of committing fraud and calls the entire case a fraud. They believe it is election interference and is preventing them from being in Iowa and New Hampshire. The speaker strongly asserts that the attorney general is a fraud who has committed fraud.

The speaker discusses the FBI's "failed investigation" of the January 6th pipe bomb, alleging the FBI has no leads or suspects, has lost information and evidence, and that the Secret Service deleted all texts from January 6th. The speaker claims Steve D'Antuono said cell phone data that could have been used to find the bomber was corrupted. The speaker states that the FBI does not have video footage of the DNC from January 6th. The speaker asks if confidential human sources were involved in the pipe bomb incident. The other speaker responded they would have to refresh themselves on the information gathered to date. The speaker suggests getting the information public before the election.

Speaker 0 notes that Wisconsin was the first state where the evidence he and his associate Chris had put together for Peter was presented under oath in a senate committee. The presentation occurred before the Wisconsin senate committee on election integrity.

The speaker claims to have facilitated an $18 million bribe for Hillary Clinton on behalf of the FBI. They state that Clinton accepted the bribe in January 2016 and that the FBI was involved in setting her up. The speaker also alleges that the FBI later told them to forget about the incident because Clinton was going to win the presidency and anyone involved in investigating her would be destroyed. They further assert that President Obama had a plan to control Clinton during her presidency and that the speaker was part of a coup against her. They claim to have known since October 2018 that the election would be hijacked.

The speaker expressed disappointment that questions from reporters have been avoided for 17 days. They urged the person in question to be more transparent with the American people and address the changes in their positions. The speaker criticized the individual for portraying themselves as tough on crime while also being critical of law enforcement and opening up old wounds. Despite the lack of attention from the person in question, the speaker thanked the reporters and left to attend their event.

Speaker 0 confesses in a video that they were paid to pretend to protest at the Capitol building. They mention having difficulty pulling off the act and getting a bruise on their leg. Although they don't reveal who paid them, they mention it was part of an organized effort.

The Attorney General briefed Speaker 0 on the DOJ and FBI review of the Epstein files. Speaker 0 stated the briefing was very quick and focused on the credibility of the information. Speaker 0 claimed the files were fabricated by Comey, Obama, and the Biden administration, similar to the "Russia, Russia, Russia hoax." Speaker 0 stated the Attorney General has handled the situation well and should release whatever she deems credible. Speaker 1 then asked about Texas and how many more seats Speaker 0 wants Republicans to have.

The speaker claims to have found documents related to Jim Comey that were not where they should have been. The speaker says these documents are unflattering to Comey. The speaker asserts that Comey disgraced the FBI numerous times with his role in crossfire hurricane and other abominations. The speaker finds it stunning that Comey continues to attack their leadership when they are cleaning up the mess Comey created and continue to find things from his era.

A person walked out of a store with ice cream, and the media asked what flavor it was, despite him being in the midst of a scandal. According to Speaker 0, the biggest scandal was when they spied on his campaign. Speaker 1 stated there's no real evidence of that and that "sixty minutes" can't put on things they can't verify. Speaker 0 insisted they spied on his campaign and got caught, but Speaker 1 said they can't verify it. Speaker 0 claimed the evidence is available and Speaker 1 doesn't want to put it on the air. Speaker 1 denied knowing about it.

Speaker 0 claims to have video footage from January 6th of two federal agents attacking the Capitol. Speaker 0 states they have been trying to get the FBI to investigate for over a year, providing them with twenty-nine minutes of high-definition footage. Speaker 0 says the FBI has not arrested the agents, nor have their images appeared online. Speaker 0 claims the FBI refuses to accept a statement or view video from January 5th, 6th, and 7th. Speaker 1 says the FBI raided them twice, came to their home, and took their phones. Speaker 1 advises Speaker 0 to avoid the FBI if possible.

Speaker 0 presents evidence (AG 50) to the attorney general, who confirms signing it. The evidence suggests a belief that the attorney general violated federal and/or state law. However, no documentary or physical evidence was provided to the FBI. The attorney general questions the credibility of Nate Paul, as he failed to provide any documentary evidence to support his theory. The attorney general disagrees that they would have brought documentary evidence of a crime by Ken Paxton to the FBI. The initial report was made in a hurry, but the urgency is not specified.

The speaker claims that starting two days after January 6th, the FBI initiated twice-daily phone calls with policing agencies nationwide, including local, state, governor's offices, and mayoral offices. According to the speaker, these calls served as a national forum. The speaker alleges that the FBI used these calls to indoctrinate law enforcement agencies, mayor's offices, and governors across the country. The speaker asserts that the FBI used these calls to instruct them on how to prosecute individuals involved in January 6th.

Speaker 0 argues that the individual is late, then urges going into the capital, which is described as incitement and premeditated. The speaker asserts the person is on video stating, “we need to breach the capital” and says this is very relevant because people ended up doing it. The claim is that the individual is instigating violence, trying to provoke or catalyze illegal acts so that the government can arrest those involved, describing undercover federal assets as honeypots that goad people into committing crimes to enable arrests of people law enforcement wanted to arrest anyway. The speaker then questions if the DOJ or federal law enforcement is seeking an insurrection, conspiracy, or acts of violence aimed at undermining an act of Congress, and asks why they aren’t looking into this person, suggesting that a lack of interest implies he may be part of the government or federal law enforcement. The implication is that there could be a reason for not pursuing him other than him being unaffiliated, namely that he is working with law enforcement. Ted Cruz is described as addressing this in a Senate hearing, with the speaker plan to read a report from the New York Post. The report is quoted: “magically, mister Epps disappeared from the public posting. According to public records, mister Epps has not been charged with anything. No one has explained why a person videoed, urging people to go to the capital, a person whose conduct was so suspect, the crowd thought he was a fed, would magically disappear from the list of people the FBI was looking at.” The overall claim is that Mister Epps, who encouraged people to go to the capital, vanished from FBI attention without explanation, despite being photographed urging action and being suspected by the crowd of being a federal agent.

The speaker claims the biggest scandal was spying on their campaign, insisting it's verified despite lack of evidence. They urge to air it for Biden's detriment. The interviewer refuses, citing the need for verification. The speaker insists they were spied on and caught, challenging the interviewer to check the papers. The interviewer remains skeptical.