reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A 15-year-old girl was raped in a school bathroom by a boy in girls' clothes. The Loudoun County School Board covered it up to protect their transgender policy during pride month. Scott Smith, the girl's father, defended her rights at a school board meeting and was condemned internationally. The senator asks the judge if she apologizes to Scott Smith and his daughter. The judge responds that anyone has the right to protest to their school board about such a horrific crime. The senator accuses the judge of being wrong and shameful, and suggests she should resign from her position.

A parent is demanding that District 109 designate locker rooms and bathrooms as biological male and biological female, citing an existing gender-neutral option. The parent claims their 13-year-old daughter was frightened and upset after encountering a biological male in the girls' bathroom on February 5. The administration allegedly stated that a student identifying as female can use the girls' facilities, which the parent believes violates federal policy. The parent filed a civil rights complaint with the Department of Justice, now referred to the Department of Education, after the incident. The parent claims the situation worsened when the same male student was present in the girls' locker room, leading the girls to refuse to change. Assistant Principal Kathy Van Trieste and others allegedly pressured the girls to change in the locker room. The parent says their daughter refused and sought help. The parent rejected the offer of a new PE class. The parent argues that allowing biological males into girls' facilities endangers female privacy and safety.

The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of action and filibustering at a meeting. They mention filing a federal lawsuit against woke indoctrination and threaten to sue if their child is taught CRT or SEL. They advocate for school choice and reject the idea of teaching sexual expression in the classroom. They criticize teachers for lying and leaving their profession due to issues like supervising bathrooms. They argue against treating children as emotional support animals and assert their role as a mother. The speaker vows to fight against these issues.

"Hi. Good evening. I'm a parent in the Davis Unified School District, and I'm here today to talk about the policies you have for the locker rooms in the junior high schools." "Right now, we require our students to undress for PE class." "depending on a child's transgender identity that they can pick which bathroom they want." "So we have right now at this school district, we have children self identifying into into different bathrooms just based off of No. Their You cannot." "I have my bathing suit on." "Excuse me. This this is allowed." "We're gonna recess. I'm gonna finish my comments." "So you are violating my first amendment right." "I am putting on my You are disrupt."

A kindergartener had to be kept from stepping in poop and pee because kids who identify as animals go to the bathroom on the floor. This is a real problem, not something the media is making up, and the speaker's children experience it every day. They experience transgenders and people who think they're bunny rabbits, kitty cats, and dogs. Kids meow and bark at them. One speaker says kids scratch them on the back because they identify as a cat. The governor thinks it's imaginary and not happening.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if biological men should be able to use women's restrooms. Speaker 1 questions the relevance to immigration. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 has ever used the women's restroom, after Speaker 1 allegedly said everyone should use the other gender's bathroom today as a protest. Speaker 1 says they have not and denies advocating for men to use women's restrooms. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 regrets encouraging men to use women's restrooms and if Speaker 1 ever considered that women don't want men in their bathrooms. Speaker 0 then asks if Speaker 1 thinks it's appropriate for men to use women's restrooms because Speaker 0 believes Speaker 1 is taking rights away from underage girls.

A man at the podium criticized the audience for unprofessional behavior, specifically calling out a husband for his actions. He expressed frustration over past issues, suggesting that the board has a history of ignoring serious matters, including assault and sexual misconduct. He highlighted that significant amounts of money have been spent to cover up these problems, indicating a lack of accountability. He urged the board to address these issues rather than bury them.

The speaker expresses strong opposition to bills regarding transgender children and accuses those who support them of being part of a cult that promotes genital mutilation. They confront various individuals, including a father and a church representative, asking them to defend their support for transgender kids. The speaker also criticizes the behavior of leftist protesters and accuses them of wanting sexual access to minors. They express frustration with the media's bias and attempt to enter a trans space, claiming to identify as a trans woman.

The speaker passionately demands the removal of a controversial book from a school library, citing explicit and disturbing content involving sexual abuse. They urge the board members, calling them either "punks" or "perverts" if they do not take immediate action to remove the book. The speaker emphasizes the need for better standards for students and insists on the book's removal that same night. The intense plea for action is directed at the board members, urging them to make the right decision promptly.

This speaker rails against transgender people in the women's bathroom, opening with, "This new world where these people wanna go into the women's bathroom with your guys' children, and we're gonna think that this is okay." "That's the root." They say, "You can be whoever the fuck you wanna be," then urge listeners to imagine mothers at Disneyland as "this thing comes in the women's restroom" and ask, "Are you out of your fucking mind? Are you out of your mind?" They insist, "But I'm a woman. Look. I'm wearing the dress. It's pretty hot." They ask, "do you want this person in the women's restroom? I don't, and I'm a male." They claim "society is trying to make that acceptable" and lament, "I'm sick to my stomach." The remark concludes with, "That is a grown man with a mustache telling Charlie that he wants to be called a she."

An angry father confronted a school board, stating his eight-year-old daughter understands the inappropriateness of boys watching girls in the bathroom, questioning the board's silence on the matter. He warned that if a boy touches his daughter in the bathroom, there would be consequences. He proposed creating a new bathroom for those who are confused or directing them to the staff bathroom. He challenged the board members, particularly the women, to invite their husbands to watch him watch them use the bathroom to expose their hypocrisy, suggesting their husbands would react with anger, similar to how he would feel about his wife. He accused the board of being too afraid of losing federal funding. The speaker agreed with the father, stating that any man would have a problem with another man following his daughter into the bathroom, regardless of intentions. He asserted that people should be allowed to dress how they want in their own time, but children should be left alone. He stated he doesn't want "sickos" who think men should share bathrooms with little girls following him.

Trans students have assaulted girls in bathrooms and locker rooms, despite claims of safety. Incidents in Virginia, California, Georgia, and Ohio show this trend. An inmate survey revealed high rates of sexual assault and violent crimes among trans individuals. Affirming gender transitions may lead to harm. The speaker challenges the audience's beliefs, emphasizing the importance of acknowledging these assaults and the consequences of denying privacy rights to women.

The speaker expresses strong opposition to the sexualization of children and accuses the individuals present of being pedophiles. They argue against discussing sex with children and advocate for protecting their innocence. The speaker claims to be addressing the school board about the curriculum and accuses them of allowing children to be sexualized. They insult and berate the individuals present, calling them pedophiles and expressing disgust towards them. The speaker also mentions a banned curriculum from 2019 and accuses the government of being involved with pedophiles. The transcript ends with a profanity-laden insult.

A speaker expresses concern about a controversial incident involving a fourth-grade student. They believe that the situation goes beyond perversion or grooming, describing it as mental rape. The speaker blames those who support and allow such incidents in schools, accusing them of mental assault on children's souls and hindering their understanding of sex and life. They criticize the board members, particularly Democrats, for pushing leftist ideologies on children. The speaker questions the educational benefit of the incident and concludes by stating that they will vote against all board members.

The speaker accuses the city council of not considering themselves leaders and not taking responsibility for their actions, likening them to cowards. They criticize the police response time of seventy-seven minutes to an incident involving children bleeding to death. The speaker presents pictures allegedly showing a cop using hand sanitizer and another on his phone smiling during the incident. They claim parents were stopped from entering the school. The speaker expresses disgust and shame towards the council and vows to expose the situation.

The speaker confronts Miss Ewing about her previous assurance that there were no instances of trans students assaulting girls in bathrooms. The speaker then proceeds to provide examples of such incidents, including cases in Loudoun County, Virginia, Irvine, California, Gwinnett County, Georgia, Oklahoma City, and Ohio. The speaker emphasizes that in each case, the perpetrators had changed their pronouns, undergone transition, or received gender affirming therapy. The speaker argues that leaving individuals in a false mental state can lead to harm. Miss Joanne responds by acknowledging the cases but states that her vote was based on federal and state laws, which prevented her from supporting the policy.

The speaker confronts someone for using the wrong bathroom, insisting that there is a child present. The other person suggests using a different bathroom, but the speaker argues that it doesn't matter and demands that they mind their own business. The speaker mentions that they are at a children's park and questions if the other person even has kids. They warn the other person not to enter the bathroom while the child is inside and asks them to watch their own kids at the park.

Speaker 0, who identifies as Ray Gallagher: Class of '97. I made it halfway through 1995, but for some reason, I was too ill behaved to even make it through Heather Ridge. I identify as Ray Gallagher, and I'm gonna go by Ray Gallagher for the rest of the speech. So you guys had six kids raped, and the first thing you thought to do was to start to ban free speech and require driver's licenses in order to stop citizens from calling you out on your bull. Well, it's not gonna work. Speaker 1: Mister Porter, I'm Speaker 0: gonna stop. I'm gonna stop Speaker 1: you right there. Speaker 0: I'm sorry. There is nothing disruptive about the content of my free speech. Do you wanna talk about Cohen versus California? Did you stop my time? You did. Speaker 1: It is stopped. Speaker 0: I'm gonna continue. No. It didn't stop. It's still counting. I'm looking at it. It's two minutes. Speaker 1: I'm gonna give you one more chance, and then I'm gonna ask you to sit down. Speaker 0: For what? Speaker 1: To abide by our new policy. Speaker 0: You can't ban specific words. My my particular view of your policies, the fact you got all these kids raped by a transgender person and then you keep pushing transgender stuff on children, is that your policy is completely out of line with America. Now this is a transgender flag, and I would like to show you demonstrably what America and the voters think about the transgender ideology being pushed on children. So that right there is what America thinks of your transgender policy four four three. Most people don't support this garbage. Literally support chopping off appendages of children and giving them puberty blockers that make them sterile. You're a monster, all of you, the ones that vote for it support this stuff. The board is out of line. The board's policies are out of line. You guys don't know what you're doing. You're pissing everybody off.

A transgender activist was asked to explain the premise of the movement, but they deflected and changed the subject. The speaker believes it is their right to ask this question because there are civil rights specifically for women, such as special bathrooms and sports leagues. They argue that if men are claiming the right to enter these spaces, either all special rights for women need to be abolished or the activists need to explain how these men are actually women. The speaker is not willing to abolish women's rights and believes most women in the country feel the same way.

The speaker addresses the PUSD community, clarifying that the phrase "separation of church and state" is not in the US constitution but in a letter by Jefferson. They argue that board members Hill and Rooks have not broken any laws by reading scripture and are not promoting a state religion. The speaker criticizes those who oppose Hill and Rooks, accusing them of prejudice and sexualizing children. They call for the resignation of three board members and encourage Hill and Rooks to stay strong. The transcript ends with a verse from Psalm.

A speaker passionately demands the removal of a controversial book from a school library, citing explicit content involving sexual abuse. The speaker highlights disturbing excerpts from the book, emphasizing the inappropriate nature of the material. They urge the board members to take immediate action, labeling them as either "punks" or "perverts" if they do not remove the book that same night. The speaker's emotional plea underscores the urgency and importance of protecting students from harmful content.

As a parent and graduate of this district, I'm deeply concerned that boys are allowed in girls' bathrooms. My daughter and other girls have voiced their concerns to the board, but were ignored. A drafted gender support plan states that students can use restrooms and locker rooms matching their gender identity. This policy and a statement on the website about Title IX are violations of girls' rights, contradicting Title IX of the Higher Education Act and President Trump's executive order. The district must rescind policies that permit these violations. Failure to do so will result in a violation filed with the Office of Civil Rights. I've addressed this before, but instead of finding solutions, the district remains silent. I urge you to bring your policies into compliance with the law to protect our young girls.

Nicole Georges demanded District 109 designate locker rooms/bathrooms as biological male/female with a gender-neutral option, citing her 13-year-old daughter's distress after encountering a biological male in the girls' bathroom on February 5. She claims the school, under Principal Wegley and Joanna Ford, violated federal policy by allowing students to use facilities aligning with their gender identity. Georges filed a civil rights complaint and alleges that girls were later pressured to change in the locker room with the male student present. She believes allowing biological males access to female spaces endangers female privacy/safety. Charlie Friedman, representing Trans Upfront, stated Illinois law protects trans students' rights, citing Executive Order 2019-11 and the Illinois Human Rights Act. They stated facilities access cannot be restricted based on anatomy or chromosomal sex, and discomfort from others is not a valid reason to deny access. Friedman offered assistance to the board in upholding state law.

A student expresses shock and embarrassment after being tricked into sharing a locker room with a male student. She questions why her school allowed this to happen without warning or alternative options. She feels uncomfortable having boys in the girls' bathroom and believes it is unacceptable. When her father complained to the school, they suggested she use a single-use bathroom far away from her classes. She argues that this solution is inconvenient and unfair to all the girls facing the same situation. She accuses the school of violating her privacy, modesty, and dignity. She asks for support from other parents and adults, as many students feel violated and concerned.

An 18-year-old high school student raises concerns about transgender individuals claiming to be women and using women's spaces. They mention an incident at MLK High School where a transgender woman, who is biologically male, had an altercation with a young woman. The student questions why the safety of women is being compromised by allowing mentally confused men to use women's spaces. They express that true girls like themselves, who are female down to their DNA, should have a say in this matter. The student urges action to protect the safety of women and calls on the school to address the issue. Another student shares their experience of being continuously bothered by the transgender individual and expresses frustration with the lack of action from the school.