TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker highlights clips with a red circle, saying, "holy shit, that is the bullet. It matches the exit wound, it also matches the shirt puffing up and the angle of the entry and exit." He adds, "in that video you can see the same what appears to be the bullet coming down and it does line up with the actual gunshot itself," and, "you can see something go down into the back right hand side of, of Charlie." Using Google Earth, he states, "his tent being set up in the middle of that triangle area would appear that the shooter was up here somewhere. That's the angle that the bullet was coming down from." "It all makes sense to me, pretty crazy." He argues location: "rooftop access there but there's also a staircase down in the little alley there in that little nook so it's to me, it's pretty obvious that the shooter was was most likely, here somewhere." "Somewhere on those stairs would be my tip, and if the FBI aren't looking there, I don't know why."

Local officers took photos of the shooter's body on a roof. A man in a gray suit, assumed to be Secret Service, asked for the photos to be sent to a specific number. However, it was later discovered that he was not Secret Service. Ron Johnson's report reveals the details of this security breach where the shooter fired 7 shots, injuring President Trump and killing Corey Compreter. The investigation delves into the agency the photos were sent to. Our thoughts are with Compreter's family.

Speaker 0: "We still have, basically confirmation he got shot. ... immediate incapacitation." He asserts "the FBI is lying" and that "it's quite literally not possible for the shooter to have been on the roof that they claim he is along with other inconsistencies across the board." Speaker 1: "Keep your eye on this space here... the bullet matches the exit wound, ... the shirt puffing up and the angle of the entry and exit." He adds: "the same what appears to be the bullet coming down and it does line up with the actual gunshot itself." From Google Earth, "the shooter was up here somewhere, that's the angle that the bullet was coming down from." "the shooter was most likely here somewhere." "Somewhere on those stairs would be my tip, and if the FBI aren't looking there, I don't know why."

A speaker asks if the recipient is aware that many Americans believe a recent shooting was a coordinated assassination attempt, not the act of a lone shooter. The speaker cites the shooter's age, proximity to the target with an AR-15, drone surveillance, and being spotted with a rangefinder as reasons for suspicion. The speaker, identifying himself as a former Navy SEAL sniper, notes the obvious sniper position from a water tower. He asks if the recipient is surprised that Americans suspect more to the story, given attempts to bankrupt and imprison the target, and depictions of him as Hitler. The speaker asks if the recipient's team entered and investigated the suspect's home prior to the shooting, to which the recipient says they participated in securing it and provided bomb assets. The speaker then asks if any agents reported anything "fishy" at the home, such as silverware or trash, or if it was extremely clean like a medical lab. The recipient states he was not given those details. The speaker concludes that this is what he is hearing and finds it "interesting."

Welcome back. On July 17, 2024, we're examining Butler Farms and the questionable Secret Service plan surrounding the Thomas shooter incident. Reports claim a sniper team was in a second-story window, but this building has no second story. It's impossible for the Secret Service to have missed a shooter aiming at Trump from the first floor. Initially, they claimed the sniper team was in this building, then changed it to a non-existent second story. The water tower is crucial here, as the shooter on the roof was a distraction. We also observed bullets coming from multiple angles. If the sniper team was in the building below, they should have seen the shooter on the roof. This situation raises serious doubts about the narrative being presented. Share your thoughts below, and I'll provide more updates throughout the day. Take care.

After Charlie Kirk was shot, the speaker notes the arrest of a little old man named George Zinn in DC and anchors on July 20 as pivotal, with coincidences around that date. He cites searches for Tempanogos Regional Hospital in Utah, questions about whether Kirk had an autopsy, and Utah medical examiner Deidra Amaro; an IP address originating in Israel is said to have accessed Amaro’s name and Utah figures Bo Mason (appointed July 17) and Matab Syed, later replaced by Robert Bowles. The speaker highlights a Bombardier Global 6,500 with tail number November1098Lima that flew near Orem at 204 feet on the day of Kirk's death and again 25 minutes later; Israel-origin IPs also searched Hunter Kozak and several Surgeons at Tempanogos Regional Hospital (examples include Steven Neelman, Robert Patterson). He urges investigators to check VPNs and IP tracks.

Charlie Kirk was taken to Tempanogos Regional Hospital. “Psycho District Of Columbia.” “Here's where, again, on September, right there, you see the searches for Timpanogos Regional Hospital, people looking for where they could try to occur.” “This spike of interest in Timpanogos Regional Hospital out of BC, and then no interest for two solid months before the shooting.” “the July 20 anchor date.” “the day before, somebody in the District Of Columbia says, we should really make sure we know what the Tempanogos Regional Hospital is.” “I thought, I wonder who the medical examiner is in Utah.” “Deidra Amaro.” “06/30/2025. In Israel.” “an IP address originating in Israel decided they were very interested in Deidre Amaro.” The speaker then cites researching “the surgeons at the Orem branch of Tampanoagos Regional Hospital,” listing “Steven Neelman,” “Robert Patterson, MD,” “Lee Trotter,” “Lee Patterson,” “Brian Gill,” and “Richard Rasmussen.” “If I'm the FBI, I might ask, is this related to an assassination where they rushed the body there, and there was a surgeon that declared Charlie Kirk a Superman and claims he found the bullet, and then signed the death certificate, and there was a watchdog.”

There have been new developments in the investigation. The suspect changed his work schedule before the incident, was seen with a range finder at a Trump rally, and later climbed onto a roof with a rifle. He aimed the range finder at countersnipers before opening fire on police. His car contained remote controlled bombs, loaded magazines, and a bulletproof vest. Investigators are still trying to determine his motives and what his intentions were.

The speaker is at a shooting range where Crooks practiced, with targets at 50, 100, and almost 200 yards. The FBI has footage from cameras that recorded Crooks and his license plate, as registration to shoot at the club is organized. The club's owners and management are cooperating with the investigation. The speaker learned firsthand that Crooks was quiet and didn't participate in group events. Shooters would sit at benches and shoot right-handed on this range. The speaker states they are going to get to the bottom of everything.

Greg Schaefer, former FBI agent and CEO of Schaefer Security Group, said investigators are at the scene collecting evidence, including cell phones, videos and photographs from everyone present, and are scouring footage to identify a vehicle or the shooter as they left. He notes the weapon may have been left on the rooftop and that there may be DNA residue, fingerprints or shell casings, with a full court press by the FBI, Homeland Security, and local and state police to identify the shooter. John Anarelli says witnesses with video want to solve the case and that the FBI has a contact number to upload video; surveillance cameras and vehicles will be reviewed. The event drew about 3,000 people; Charlie Kirk had security, but security was not the same as protecting the site, and countersniper capabilities are extremely difficult. Charlie Kirk is a civilian; ballistic glass costs were discussed.

- Kibbe on Liberty hosts Congressman Thomas Massey for part one of a mega episode focusing on the FBI-identified pipe bomber in the January 6 events and the anomalies in the official narrative; Massey argues he does not believe one loner acted alone. - Massey discusses prior coverage and context, noting a Steve Baker interview that documented inconsistencies in the official narrative. He points to fallout from that interview: a Capitol Hill Police official, who was third in command, resigned the day after the interview; another whistleblower contacted Massey about that officer, suggesting misconduct unrelated to the pipe bomb but part of a larger pattern of investigations. - Massey argues that the FBI’s announcement of a suspect came about a week after that interview and after reporting by The Blaze, and suggests the timing is suspicious. He says this coincidence is surprising and potentially a red flag, given that the investigation had been deemed inconclusive or dormant for years. - Massey emphasizes his own context: his staffer on the Hill watched hours of video to identify who found the second pipe bomb; he asserts that the individuals who found the second bomb should be considered suspects, and that the FBI admitted this to him. He recounts efforts with Kevin McCarthy to release video showing how the second pipe bomb was found, noting that those who found it were very lucky to locate it quickly. - He describes other connections and leads: his staffer now works for Kash Patel; Massey has spoken with a counter-surveillance officer who found the pipe bomb and with the officer’s handler, a Capitol Hill Police member who had previously worked for the ATF and later for Metro Police and Capitol Hill Police. He also mentions conversing with the assistant FBI director in charge of the Washington field office, in a transcribed interview with Jim Jordan about why cell phone data wasn’t used to geolocate the suspect (the provider allegedly corrupted data, which the judiciary committee and Barry Loudermilk’s committee disputed). - Massey references a 100-page report from Barry Loudermilk’s committee on the pipe bomb investigation, noting leads the FBI did not follow. He mentions a lead about an individual in Falls Church, Virginia (a former military man now in government service) whose metro card was used on January 5 and January 6; this person’s childhood friend allegedly used the metro card to approach the RNC/Capitol Hill Club area and take photographs near the pipe bomb sites. Massey asserts this person of interest, plus a neighbor who shared a wall with him, could be connected to others the FBI has not fully explored. - He contends that the arrest appears to derail other investigations and interviews that were being planned. He asserts that a “pro-Trump” motive has not been established for the suspect, contrasting the media’s framing with details such as the suspect’s My Little Pony interest and parental political donations. - Massey criticizes the prosecutor in the case, Jocelyn Ballantine, and recounts concerns about her track record (including involvement in the Flynn case, the Proud Boys case, and alleged attempts to obtain confessions implicating Trump). He questions why she remains at the DOJ. - They discuss broader concerns about FBI politicization and surveillance: Massey references reporters and contact with Kash Patel’s team to argue for cleaning house at the FBI, but notes Ballantine remains in place. He describes eight senators discovering they had been spied on, leading to a legislative push: in the last continuing resolution, lawmakers added a half-million-dollar payout and standing to sue the government for surveillance abuses, a provision he characterizes as carving exemptions out of the law; he says this was supported by most lawmakers, who voted for the CR due to Trump concerns. - They debate possible explanations for the pipe bomber case: the possibility that the FBI identified the suspect and cleared him, prompting no arrest due to exonerating information; or the possibility of a false narrative crafted by others to preserve the January 6 prosecution framework; or the involvement of a patsy or rogue actor. - Massey reiterates his three things he said on Twitter: the bomber was a lone wolf (which he disputes); the FBI was unwittingly incompetent for four years (which he says he questions and calls a cover-up); and it was not a Trump supporter. He stresses the need for more transcribed interviews and explanations from the FBI and ongoing oversight to uncover the full truth. - The discussion shifts toward Epstein files coverage and the broader goal of maintaining public pressure for transparency. They indicate a plan to release a separate bonus episode focusing on Epstein files.

Speaker 0 introduced the topic of cell phone tracking and forensic geofencing data, noting that the same tracking methods used in January 6 were capable of determining whether someone went onto the steps or onto the lawn, and where they were exactly. The question was what findings exist regarding this data in the current case. Speaker 1 answered that the investigation will reveal with great clarity whether Tyler Robinson was in the Orem area, whether the text messages involving many questions were sent from Orem to Lance Twigg, and whether Lance Twigg was in Southern Utah or also in Orem. The main point is addressing how he could have known certain details based on terrain, given that he was not a student at the school. It is stated that it would be unlikely to have planned a murder from Google Maps, and that the authorities will determine this from the cell phone pathway—whether he went the day before or weeks before, and tracking all of that. Speaker 1 relayed information from forensic expert Joseph Scott Morgan, who claimed they would be able to track Tyler Robinson from 8 Hundredth Street through a tunnel, around the Losey Building, up the stairs to the roof, from the roof to the roofline, take the shot, jump off the Losey Building, and run into the woods. The speaker also mentioned conspiracy videos suggesting he was seen on a café security system; although the footage is limited, it exists, and some claim the FBI tracked him to that location. The next morning, at 7:15 AM, at a Cedar City Maverick gas station, it is claimed he swiped a credit card, and the phone was followed to his home, to visits with Lance, and to his parents. All calls, texts, and other phone activity are said to be known. Speaker 1 summarized that the forensic expert states that next to the gun, the cell phone data will be the element that ties Tyler Robinson directly to the person on the building, and that geotracking will reveal where his phone was at all times on that day. The response also notes skepticism about trust in the FBI, but emphasizes that geotracking will demonstrate the phone’s location during the day in question.

Two individuals came up with the idea to validate the data by looking at two cold case murders. One of the cases involved the shooting of an 8-year-old girl in Atlanta. They visually identified a few unique devices that could have been used in the shooting. Each color on the map represents a different person, and the shooting occurred in a specific parking lot. The information was given to the FBI, who have since arrested two suspects, believed to be gang members. The tracking of these devices parallels the work being done with the mules.

Stephen Gardner argues that the smoking gun will be the geolocation data next to the DNA evidence on the rifle, asserting that DNA would be on the trigger, but geolocation is needed to implicate Tyler Robinson. He questions relying on geolocation data when video evidence exists, noting CCTV footage should show Tyler Robinson’s movements: entering the parking lot, walking through the garage, onto the roof, under the bridge, into the Losey Building, and more. He criticizes the need for experts and geolocation, saying that if Kesh Patel picked up a screwdriver at the crime scene, it would not necessarily hurt the case, and questions how geolocation could be the smoking gun after a murder broadcast on live TV. He adds a personal jab about growing up in a trailer and dismisses experts, contrasting with the video footage that he believes should be sufficient. Ryan Mehta introduces the discussion about cell phone tracking and forensic geofencing data, comparing it to methods used in January 6 to determine people’s exact locations on the steps or lawn. He asks what will be found in this case regarding Tyler Robinson and the text messages between him and Lance Twigg, questioning whether Twigg was in Southern Utah or in Orem. He states that investigators could determine if Tyler Robinson was in the Orem area and track whether the messages were sent from Orem. The main point, according to him, is that the forensic data would reveal whether Tyler Robinson knew terrain details not associated with a student at the school, and whether the murder could have been planned from Google Maps. Speaker Joe Scott Morgan, cited by Mehta, notes that they will be able to track Tyler Robinson’s movements from eight hundredth Street through tunnels, around the Losey Building, up stairs to the roof, from the roof to the edge, the shot, then the escape into the woods, and mentions conspiracy videos claiming he was seen on a cafe’s security system. Mehta mentions conspiracy theories about how he could kill Charlie Kirk and be in his car twenty minutes later, arguing that a murderer’s behavior could vary. He claims the FBI tracked him to a location after the crime, identifying him at Cedar City Maverick gas station at 07:15 AM, noting card swipes and phone activity to show home visits, interactions with Lance, and visits to his parents. The belief is that phone calls, texting, and other data would tie Tyler Robinson directly to the person on the building, addressing doubts about trusting the FBI and the role of geotracking as the potential smoking gun.

Oversight tracked 9 phones at the shooter's home, then to his workplace at a nursing home, and to a fairground where he did recon on July 4th and 8th. The shooter turned his phone off after the 12th. One phone pinged in DC at a building with FBI offices and meeting spots.

There were multiple improbable factors that would have had to align for these bombs to be discovered at the same time on a sidewalk, prompting questions about a broader conspiracy and how such a scenario could unfold. The speakers emphasize that while they want to avoid a conspiracy path, there are many questions still open, including the handling of video footage. Regarding video records, one speaker notes that they want to review January 6 video to see if anyone returned to the locations, but that video apparently does not exist anymore. They do have January 5 video, but have been told that no one preserved January 6. This raises eyebrows as they consider whether the devices were placed by an inexperienced person who was trying to set them down quickly or whether the devices were left to be found. Mrs. Younger’s account is highlighted: she walked out her back door and did not see anything earlier in the morning, but saw the devices later, which would give a reason to believe she would have noticed them if they had been there in the morning. This observation is part of why they want to talk to her. One speaker is blown away by a point: according to the FBI, the FBI’s internal data indicate 39,000 videos showing the hoodie-clad pipe bomber—referred to as the C. Virkel bomber—movements that night, from various camera angles. Washington, DC, Capitol Hill is described as among the most surveilled areas in the world. Yet there is a claim that there is no footage from January 6 of the actual areas a person would have had to travel to place the pipe bombs. The other speaker confirms that there are cameras along some Capitol Police lines that show walking paths, including footage from Capitol Police cameras, but the angles that would show positions behind the RNC and behind the DNC do not exist today, at least not in a way that captures the relevant movements. This absence has limited the investigation into the theory that the devices could have been placed earlier and then moved or re-placed. They are now going back through Capitol Police footage, including from the Fairchild Building near the DNC, which has provided the most evidence so far. The team is reviewing hours from about 8 PM on May 5 to 1 PM on January 6 to determine whether anyone else passed by, whether there was any suspicious activity, and whether the devices were moved again. The investigators are evaluating step-by-step explanations for these anomalies, considering whether the Secret Service dog failed to detect one device or whether Mrs. Younger missed the other, whether the devices were not present at that time, or whether weather and other factors affected detections. They acknowledge that with so many circumstances, some “smoke” might indicate “fire.” They hope the FBI is reviewing cell phone data to determine if the suspected bomber returned or if a co-conspirator was involved in setting timers or re-placing devices. The transcript ends with an acknowledgment of ongoing investigation scope and questions.

"holy shit, that is the bullet." "It matches the exit wound, it also matches the shirt puffing up and the angle of the entry and exit." "I needed another angle just to see if this was actually fact trying to get as much info as I could before I posted anything" "from this looking at Google Earth and drawing a line from where I believe the shooter was, his tent being set up in the middle of that triangle area would appear that the shooter was up here somewhere." "That's the angle that the bullet was coming down from." "Somewhere on those stairs would be my tip, and if the FBI aren't looking there, I don't know why."

The discussion centers on forensic cell phone tracking and geofencing data, the same methods that were used to track individuals in January 6 cases, including whether someone went onto the steps, onto the lawn, or exactly where they were. The speakers indicate that investigators can determine an individual’s precise movements and locations through cell phone data. The key point is that in this case, it will become clear whether Tyler Robinson was in the Orem area, and whether the text messages that have raised questions—whether those messages were sent from Orem to Lance Twigg—place Lance Twigg in Southern Utah or also in Orem. The main outcome anticipated is clarity about Robinson’s location, but importantly, the discussion emphasizes the ability to reconstruct movements and associations from cell phone data. The speakers note that people are asking how Robinson could have known about certain details based on terrain, given that he was not a student at the school, and they argue that Google Maps alone would not explain this. They assert that the path of his cell phone—whether he went the day before or weeks before—will be accessible, allowing investigators to track his movements comprehensively. A forensic expert, Joseph Scott Morgan, is cited as saying they would be able to trace his movement from 8 Hundredth Street, down through a tunnel, around the Losey Building, up the stairs, onto the roof, from the roof out to the roofline, where the shot was taken, and then to him running into the woods. The conversation also references conspiracy videos claiming to see him on a cafe’s security system—claiming his car is visible—arguing that this is not necessarily inconsistent with a murderer’s behavior, since a killer could be in a car while amped up on adrenaline. The speakers explain that the cafe owner could only review such surveillance if the FBI tracked him to that location; they discuss how geolocation and surveillance data would be used to corroborate movements, including how, the next morning at 7:15 AM, at a Cedar City Maverick gas station, he swipes a credit card and the authorities follow his phone, tracking when he goes home, whether he visits Lance, and when he visits his parents, with a full trail of calls, texts, and movements. The forensic expert, Joseph Scott Morgan, emphasizes that aside from the gun, the cell phone data will be the key element tying Tyler Robinson directly to the person on the building, and that geotracking will reveal where his phone was at all times on that day, addressing doubts about the FBI’s methods and reliability.

Stephen Gardner and Jack Buzovic argue that the smoking gun will be the geolocation data next to the DNA evidence on the rifle. They say, essentially, you steal my car and commit a crime, you’ll likely find my DNA in the vehicle and on the trigger, so now we’re going to trust some expert to provide magical geolocation data. They question how Tyler Robinson could be involved and suggest this should be a single, big government conspiracy if he didn’t actually take the shot. They insist CCTV video would show Tyler Robinson moving through the parking garage, onto the roof, and through various locations, and that the investigation should not avoid showing the video. They ask how a juror would be convinced without video footage when there are twenty different videos, and whether geolocation data could hurt the case when a murder has been committed. They complain about having to trust another expert and mention past high-profile investigations. They demand to see CCTV video showing Tyler Robinson walking across the campus, onto the roof, getting into his car, running through neighborhoods, because all that has been presented is “slop.” Ryan Mehta introduces this segment as a critique of the presented evidence. Speaker 1 (questioning the forensic approach) asks about cell phone tracking and geofencing data, noting that the same method was used in January 6 to determine who was on the steps or on the lawn. They ask what was found regarding that data in this case. Speaker 2 responds that the case will reveal with great clarity whether Tyler Robinson was in the Orem area and whether the texts that many have questions about were sent from Orem to Lance Twigg, and whether Lance Twigg was in Southern Utah or in Orem. The main point is that people are asking how he could have known given the terrain and that Google Maps could not have allowed planning of the murder. They say the data will show paths, including whether he went the day before or weeks before, and will track all of that. Joseph Scott Morgan told them they would be able to track him from 8 Hundredth Street down through the tunnel, up around the Losey Building, up the stairs, onto the roof, from the roof out to the roofline, take the shot, jump off the Losey Building, run into the woods. They mention conspiracy videos claiming he was spotted at a cafe on security footage; some claimed the cafe owner saw him on security cameras, while others claimed it wasn’t consistent with a murderer’s behavior. They argue the FBI tracked him to that location, and that the next morning at 07:15 AM, a Cedar City Maverick gas station records his credit card use and follows his phone, his movements home, visits to Lance, and visits to his parents, with all phone calls, texts, and other data available. The forensic expert, Joseph Scott Morgan, asserts that next to the gun, the cell phone data will be the thing that ties Tyler Robinson directly to the person on that building, and there is doubt among some about trusting the FBI. The discussion ends with the assertion that geotracking will provide the crucial link.

There have been new developments in the investigation. The suspect changed his work schedule before the incident. He was seen with a range finder at a Trump rally, observed by security. Later, he was spotted on the roof with a rifle. When confronted by police, he opened fire. In his car, there were remote-controlled bombs, loaded magazines, and a bulletproof vest. Investigators are still trying to understand his motives and what he planned to do next.

Crooks practiced at this range with targets at 50, 100, and almost 200 yards. The FBI has footage from cameras that would pick up his license plate. Registering to shoot at this club is very organized, and the owners and management have been cooperative with the investigation. Firsthand accounts confirm statements about Crooks being quiet and not participating in group events. Shooters would sit at benches and shoot right-handed on this range. The speaker states that they are going to get to the bottom of everything.

"This morning, I can tell you that we have recovered what we believe is the weapon to be that was used in yesterday's shooting." "It is a high powered bolt action rifle." "That rifle was recovered in a wooded area where the shooter had fled." "So the FBI laboratory will be analyzing this weapon." "Investigators have also collected footwear impression, a palm print, and forearm imprints for analysis." "Now, I understand there are a lot of questions about motive." "I assure you that all leads, tips, and tips are being fully investigated." "As of this morning, we have received more than a 130 We thank the community for that."

The suspect changed his work schedule before attending a Trump rally with a rangefinder. Security noticed him observing countersniper positions. When confronted by police, he pulled out an AR 15 gun and opened fire. His car contained remote controlled bombs, a bulletproof vest, and ammunition. It is unclear what his intentions were.

We analyzed the drone's flight path during the rally, confirming it flew for about 11 minutes from approximately 3:50 PM to 4 PM, around 200 yards away from where former President Trump was speaking. This position likely provided the shooter with a view of the area behind the stage, akin to a rearview mirror. While the drone wasn't directly overhead, it could have offered insights into the stage setup and surrounding environment. We are still investigating what the shooter might have seen during this time, hypothesizing that the drone was live streaming. The flight path suggests it was observing the scene from a distance, roughly the length of a football field.

Speaker maps Tyler's route to the shooting using security footage, starting at 'This pink flower bed is the flower bed that Tyler has actually captured on Ring doorbell camera.' He is 'seen at 11:49' with 'the rifle in his pants' and was 'also seen around 8AM, a few hours just prior in a completely different outfit in shorts.' He 'came down, he scoped and planned this route' and the path is retraced through a tunnel, a parking structure, and a roof 'sniper's perch' where he 'took the shot' before jumping off the roof. The shooter then 'crosses the street, right up into this field.' Officers described 'the wooded area that the gun was supposedly stashed in' and noted that 'almost the entirety of this route has not had a single security camera' with 'All these roads are closed off at this point' as the perimeter expanded.