TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

There is audio evidence suggesting that there were at least two shooters firing at Trump and the crowd during the Capitol riot. The speaker presents their analysis of the audio, pointing out distinct differences in the sound of the shots and the presence of echoes. They propose that the first three shots came from inside the building, while the subsequent shots were fired from a different location. The speaker concludes that there were at least two shooters involved, and questions the official narrative of a lone gunman. They urge viewers to share the information and express concerns for their safety.

We saw a man crawling on a roof with a rifle while Trump was speaking. We alerted the police and Secret Service, but they seemed unaware. Eventually, the man was shot by the Secret Service. The speaker is certain the shots came from the man on the roof.

The speaker presents audio evidence of at least 2 shooters targeting Trump and the crowd, debunking the lone gunman theory. The first 3 shots were from a different location and weapon than the following 5 or 6 shots. Analysis suggests 2 distinct weapons were used, with echoes indicating shooter positions. The sniper shot was separate. The conclusion is that the lone shooter theory is false, suggesting a coordinated operation. The speaker expresses concern for safety but believes those responsible for the botched operation may face consequences.

We focus on the area where 3 victims were shot in the bleachers. Bullets came from Thomas Crooks' location, grazing President Trump's ear and hitting a spectator. Video evidence shows the first shot coinciding with Trump's speech. Trump is hit, falls, and more shots follow. 7 or 8 shots were fired, injuring spectators unintentionally. The bullets hit near a forklift, causing a hydraulic hose to burst.

Yes. I saw him. What's called? Are you recording this?' 'Yes. You're live right now. Well, we're we're recording. I don't know if we're live because of the cell service.' They add, 'standing in probably the third okay. I was standing from probably the third row in the bottom. I saw hit. I heard the shot ring out. I looked to my left, and then I looked over to my right.' 'I saw him slump over in his chair forward. He slumped over. He had blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt,' The narrator concludes, 'This guy says a man died today. This is unconfirmed. That's what this eyewitness testimony just said. Everybody's in shock, including myself.'

Speaker 0: "We still have, basically confirmation he got shot. ... immediate incapacitation." He asserts "the FBI is lying" and that "it's quite literally not possible for the shooter to have been on the roof that they claim he is along with other inconsistencies across the board." Speaker 1: "Keep your eye on this space here... the bullet matches the exit wound, ... the shirt puffing up and the angle of the entry and exit." He adds: "the same what appears to be the bullet coming down and it does line up with the actual gunshot itself." From Google Earth, "the shooter was up here somewhere, that's the angle that the bullet was coming down from." "the shooter was most likely here somewhere." "Somewhere on those stairs would be my tip, and if the FBI aren't looking there, I don't know why."

Trump arrived at an event, and a person on a motorcycle with a "Don't Tread on Me" flag disappeared. Gunshots were heard, and confusion arose about the shooter's identity. Security was tight, but some items were allowed in. Witnesses saw a person on the roof, questioning the angle of the shots. Unarmed civilians were reportedly shot.

We were at a party near the rally when we noticed a man crawling on the roof with a rifle. We pointed him out to the police and Secret Service, but Trump continued speaking. After a few minutes, we heard five shots. I’m certain they came from that man. The Secret Service then shot him. They approached the roof to confirm he was dead. He was dressed in muted colors, and we clearly saw the rifle. It’s shocking that we could see him while the security forces didn’t seem to notice. If I had approached with anything suspicious, I wouldn’t be here now. There are many questions about the security measures in place.

An individual claims that local law enforcement did not leave their posts to search for a potential shooter, contradicting what someone else said to Congress. They state that the officers remained at their assigned locations but couldn't see the shooter from their vantage point. The speaker clarifies that local law enforcement volunteered their time and performed the duties assigned to them by the Secret Service. They were assigned to specific locations, including a building in the area where the shooting occurred. The two officers in question were stationed on the second floor of a building, looking out a window, and did not leave their post. The speaker doesn't know why the officers weren't positioned on the roof, but asserts they were where they were instructed to be. They clarify that local law enforcement wasn't in charge of the building, but were there to observe a specific area. The Secret Service was in charge of the entire location.

The speaker describes their location relative to Trump, stating they were on his left. They then describe bleachers to Trump's left, which were to the speaker's right. The speaker claims the "unaliving" happened on the far right side of Trump, and they were on the far left. The speaker asserts that shots came from behind the bleachers to the left of Trump, and people indicated the shots' origin to Secret Service. The speaker insists something happened on the left side of the event and denies being panicked or unclear about their memory. The first shot sounded farther away to the right of Trump, while the second sounded closer. The speaker believes two men were shot from behind the left side of the bleachers to the left of Trump. They claim there was more than one shooter, including someone on the roof to the right of Trump and another behind the bleachers to the left.

A dark figure is seen at the top as President Trump speaks. About four seconds after shots are fired, this person steps out. The speaker says they heard one shooter in the water tower and one by the fence. They screamed, "It's the sniper," and states the sniper was firing down toward the water tower. A gentleman behind the speaker, who was one seat to the right, could see the sharpshooter behind Trump. He said the sharpshooter shot to the left and killed the gentleman in the water tower.

A sharpshooter shot at Trump, causing his ear to bleed. Another person was killed in the stands. A man in a white shirt was covered in blood, indicating someone was shot nearby. The witness realized the seriousness when Trump was taken down. Authorities suspect two shooters, one captured and one at large. The witness expresses sadness over the violence and hopes for justice.

The speakers discuss an alleged shooting incident involving Donald Trump, with claims that a gunman was on a nearby roof during a speech. One witness says he saw a man crawling on the roof with a rifle and alerted police and Secret Service before shots rang out, claiming the Secret Service then "blew his head off." Doubts are raised about whether Trump was actually shot in the ear as reported. One speaker suggests the event was staged, pointing to the position of Trump's body and the lack of blood on his hand after he touched his ear. They claim the blood on Trump's face looked like fake blood and that the Secret Service blocked views to apply it. Another speaker claims the shots came from a Secret Service agent, not the alleged shooter on the roof. They analyze video footage, claiming to identify the sound of gunshots originating from the agent's position. They argue that the lack of blood on Trump's collar proves he wasn't shot.

The speaker presents audio evidence of two shooters targeting Trump and the crowd, contradicting the lone gunman theory. They analyze the sound of shots from different weapons and locations, concluding that the shots were aimed at Trump. The speaker fears for their safety but believes the operation was botched. The analysis suggests multiple shooters were involved, challenging the official narrative.

I was at the rally, seated on the far left of the podium where President Trump was speaking. I heard several gunshots and immediately recognized them as gunfire. A man beside me was shot in the head and died instantly, while a woman nearby was injured in the forearm. It was chaotic; many thought it was fireworks. I helped carry the deceased man to a tent behind the bleachers. He had family members present, and they were in shock. I also saw President Trump get grazed by a bullet in the ear just before the Secret Service took him down. The shots seemed to come from behind us, and it felt like the man was caught in the crossfire. This was my first rally, and I never expected something like this to happen.

There are at least two different weapons being fired, with the first three shots coming from a different location than the following shots. The sonic cracks indicate all shots were directed towards Trump and the audience, ruling out the lone shooter theory as false. The hypothesis suggests two shooters, possibly three, with the first three shots likely coming from inside the building. Shots 1, 2, 4, and 5 are believed to have been fired by crooks, while shots 3 and 6 remain puzzling. Echoes and timing discrepancies support the theory of multiple shooters.

In video 1, shots 1-3 are clear, but shots 4-6 are confusing. Video 2 clarifies with shots 1-3 and a different set of shots. Two weapons are involved, one firing 3 shots and the other 5-6 shots. The shots are aimed at the stage and Trump, indicating multiple shooters. The first three shots lack echoes, while the following shots have echoes, suggesting different locations. Different sounds and echoes confirm two separate weapons used.

The speaker points out a location where they believe a person could not have shot at Trump due to obstructing trees. They explain how the shooter would not have had a clear line of sight to hit the snipers on the roof. They emphasize that the idea of the shooting is a lie.

We were at a party near the rally, listening to Trump speak when we noticed a man crawling on the roof nearby with a rifle. We pointed him out to the police and Secret Service, but they seemed unaware. After a few minutes, shots rang out, and we were certain they came from the road. The Secret Service quickly responded and shot the man. They approached the roof to confirm he was dead. He was dressed in muted colors, and we could see the rifle clearly. It’s shocking that we could see him for so long without any security on the roof. There are many questions about the security response during the incident.

A sharpshooter shot Trump, injuring his ear and killing someone in the stands. A man in a white shirt was covered in blood, indicating he was near a victim. The realization that it was not fireworks but a shooting occurred when Trump was on the ground. Authorities suspect two shooters, with one still at large. The speaker expresses sadness over the violence and hopes for justice.

Speaker 0 says they downloaded nearly original footage from the incident and note that reuploads compress the file, referencing “the national file,” and aim to “disprove this or not.” Speaker 1 points to Charlie Kirk: “how many You see him right there? That’s him debating with somebody here right before he gets shot.” “He got shot from his right hand side on that side coming out here.” They discuss a rooftop shooter theory, noting walls, bleachers, and that “you got shot from rooftop.” They show a rooftop trajectory diagram: “count with me… flat surface one, flat surface two, and then flat surface three… almost up on four,” arguing the shooter would have a straight shot at Charlie. They claim “this is 100% the shot” and say “the mic… was the first entry wound” is incorrect; “there is no entry wound on the left side of his neck. He got hit on the right side.” They demand CCTV footage release from Turning Point, noting cameras and a cameraman, and urge campus footage to verify angles, mentioning trees “above the rooftop” and needing to see if the edge of the roof is visible. They conclude the shooter was on the highest point and that multiple cameras likely captured it.

One person was killed, and two others are critically injured, including former President Trump, who reported being grazed by a bullet. Attention is drawn to the shooter, who was positioned on the edge of a building. Visuals show the shooter and the distance from where he fired. The building's size is emphasized, along with the small scale of the police vehicle and bystanders. A lamp on the building is examined, revealing discrepancies in its appearance from different angles. The claim is made that the lamp seen from the back of the building does not match the original, suggesting something is amiss. This inconsistency raises concerns about the situation.

Speaker 0 describes the moment from the vantage of probably the third row in the bottom; he asserts that he was standing there when the event occurred. He states that he heard the shot ring out. He explains that he looked to his left, and then he looked to his right. He reports that he saw the man slump over in his chair forward. He repeats that he slumped over. He notes that blood was coming from the left side of the neck down the shirt, and that he slumped over, and he was carried off. He adds that the crowd is running high right now.

The speaker discusses the shooter's close proximity to a fairground and the president's location. They question why law enforcement did not see the shooter on the low roof before the incident occurred, given the close quarters and visibility. The speaker expresses confusion over the lack of intervention before the shooting began.

Authorities claim the shooter's body on the building's roof was staged to look like he shot Trump, but new footage proves otherwise. The video shows the body far left, not close to the ridge as previously portrayed. The New York Times quietly released a documentary shifting the body's position to cover up the shooting angle. The shooter had no clear shot from the building, contradicting the government's narrative of a direct line of sight on Trump's podium. No official explanation has been given for the conflicting angles presented.