reSee.it - Related Video Feed

- Speaker 0 apologized in 2016 for a promise about 1000 euros, stating that was a mistake and clarifying that it is not about Ukraine joining the European Union; they are against that as well. - On policy positions, Speaker 0 says: there should not be changes to mortgage interest deduction; they are not in favor of increasing the deductible; they are investing half a billion in the development of alternative energy, with a caveat about wind turbines, noting that those wind turbines operate on subsidies and “do not operate on wind.” - Speaker 1 recalls a statement from nine years ago about a street worker who works 40 years and can retire at 65, noting that nothing of that has been seen in recent years. Speaker 0 counters with “five years said, right?” to confirm the timeline. - Speaker 0 references a past claim about someone being under oath, saying that if it involved political motives, the law would be set aside. They remark not to recall a speech about “group immunity,” and state they have not heard such a speech. - The discussion moves to a person not being in service of the VVD; they state she does not work for the VVD, has no VVD parliamentary pass, and that Speaker 0 had lied about the matter being about Omtzigt. - Speaker 0 asserts that they did so to the best of their knowledge, admitting there was no memo that had been requested by the informant or informally requested; they did not have that memory and could not reconstruct what was discussed in 2015. They acknowledge uncertainty about what exactly was on the table in 2015 and admit they cannot precisely reconstruct those details. - They mention a second example and reference someone named Caroline, then question whether it is odd that officials would be aware of something and the other person would not be informed. They ask if this was four years ago, saying they would not know. They conclude by saying they have misremembered this in hindsight and express sincere regret.

These are tough times for Canadians with rising costs of living. Housing prices are soaring, with 2-bedroom apartments in big cities averaging $3,000 a month. Families are struggling with increased mortgage payments and grocery bills. Justin Trudeau has been neglecting these issues, favoring corporations over working people. Our efforts led to $1 billion for affordable housing and indigenous communities, as well as a framework for single-payer pharmacare. With just 25 NDP MPs, millions will benefit from free birth control, diabetes medication, and medical devices. Imagine the possibilities with a federal NDP government.

The speaker criticizes the leader of the opposition for suggesting that everything was perfect under the previous conservative government and wanting to make Canada great again. Canadians do not share this nostalgia. The speaker highlights the leader's past as part of Stephen Harper's failed housing minister, where he violated the rights of indigenous peoples, ignored environmental responsibilities, and lacked a plan for the future.

Minister Freeland and the speaker discussed shared priorities between the federal and provincial governments. The speaker emphasized the importance of working together to address issues such as healthcare, affordability, and homelessness. They highlighted healthcare and affordability as top priorities. The speaker also mentioned that a clean and healthy environment is crucial for economic growth.

The speaker points to a chart showing a sharp decrease in illegal immigration during their time in office. They claim it was the lowest in history. They criticize the current president for a significant increase in illegal immigration, estimating around 20 million people. The speaker suggests looking at more recent data for a clearer picture.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the issue of retirement and government assistance. They express frustration with the current system, highlighting the disparity between those who have worked their whole lives and receive minimal pensions, and those who have never worked and receive similar benefits. They question the value of working if the financial benefits are minimal compared to the costs of childcare and other expenses. They argue that as long as the government continues to provide generous assistance, people will choose not to work. They also worry about the example this sets for future generations.

To control pension costs, we need to limit the growth of our retirement income system. The government has already taken steps to reduce healthcare spending, and now we must do the same for pensions. Stephen Harper's government raised the retirement age from 65 to 67 without prior campaign promises, cutting benefits for seniors. The conservatives are likely to do the same in the future.

The speaker criticizes the leader of the opposition, stating that he believes everything was perfect under the previous conservative government and wants to make Canada great again. However, the speaker argues that Canadians do not share this sentiment. They highlight the leader's past actions as part of Stephen Harper's failed housing minister, including violating the rights of indigenous peoples and neglecting environmental responsibilities. The speaker also mentions the lack of a future environmental and economic plan.

The speaker states they capped prescription medication costs at $2,000 annually for seniors and insulin costs at $35 for seniors. They highlight that Black individuals are 60% more likely to be diagnosed with diabetes. The speaker claims that another plan would eliminate the insulin cost cap.

Former President Biden will deliver his first major speech since leaving office tonight, reportedly focusing on Social Security under the current administration. Democrats have been claiming that there are office closures, longer wait times, and difficulty accessing benefits for seniors and people with disabilities. In response, it is claimed that President Trump is committed to protecting Social Security benefits for law-abiding, tax-paying American citizens and seniors who have paid into the program. He campaigned on this promise, protected it during his first term, and intends to continue protecting it.

We need to focus on growing the economy and investing in important areas. Canada managed the pandemic better than many other countries, with fewer deaths and health issues due to high vaccination rates. Our economy is rebounding quickly, despite the challenges of rising costs and inflation. Our priority is to support people by investing in new housing, providing grocery rebates, and promoting competition. We are committed to helping Canadians pay their bills after the holiday season. While pandemic supports are ending, we will continue to support the economy and small businesses now and in the future.

In the past 3 years, more people have left than joined the Canadian Armed Forces, leading to recruitment issues. The speaker criticizes the government for prioritizing spending on various projects over supporting veterans and the military. They highlight examples of what they perceive as wasteful spending, totaling over $600 billion, suggesting this may contribute to low recruitment numbers due to lack of support for those who serve the country.

The speaker maintains that their administration's work is a success. They cite capping the annual cost of prescription medication for seniors at $2,000, extending the child tax credit (which they claim cut child poverty in America by over 50 percent), investing in the American people, bringing manufacturing back to the United States (resulting in over 800,000 new manufacturing jobs), bringing business back to America, and improving the supply chain so the US is not reliant on foreign governments to supply American families with their basic needs as examples of good work.

During our time in office, we faced a pandemic and high unemployment rates. However, our economic policies have successfully reduced inflation and led to the creation of 14 million new jobs, including 800,000 in manufacturing. Wages have also increased, indicating significant progress.

Donald Trump denies ever saying that he wants to cut Social Security or raise the retirement age. However, there is a challenge to this statement. Nikki Haley's claim that she didn't call for raising the age of Social Security is being reviewed. Trump suggests that the retirement age of 65 is too low and needs to be increased. After reviewing the evidence, it is clear that Haley did indeed plan to change the rules and raise the age of Social Security, resulting in benefit cuts for 80% of Americans. Trump approves this message.

The Prime Minister defends the carbon tax as revenue neutral, citing the parliamentary budget officer's report that 8 out of 10 families benefit from the rebate. He accuses conservative politicians of misleading Canadians, stating that the tax puts more money in families' pockets and helps combat climate change by making polluters pay. The Prime Minister argues that conservatives oppose climate action and the tax helps low and middle-income families.

Some oppose our vision, refusing to support our budget and financial aid for small businesses. They neglect the vital role small businesses play in our economy and communities. They resist making Canada's tax system fairer for the wealthy. They advocate for minimal government involvement. Austerity would leave Canadians to fend for themselves, contrary to our values of mutual support. We pledge to empower younger generations and those who support them by using government resources to expand the middle class and uphold our country's promise. Thank you. Translation: Some people disagree with our plans and refuse to support our budget and financial aid for small businesses. They do not acknowledge the important role small businesses play in our economy and communities. They are against making Canada's tax system fairer for the wealthy. They believe in minimal government involvement. Austerity would mean individuals are left to fend for themselves, which goes against our values of mutual support. We promise to empower younger generations and those who support them by using government resources to expand the middle class and uphold our country's promise. Thank you.

In the exchange, the interviewer challenges the government’s line on its fiscal and welfare choices. The interviewer cites a statement attributed to the leader of the opposition, quoting: “For months, Reeves has lied to the public to justify record tax hikes to pay for more welfare. Did you lie?” The question is direct: did Reeves lie? Reeves responds by framing his role and goal. He says, “Look. I'm a labor chancellor. I want to reduce child poverty. I make no apologies for that.” He asserts this will be “the biggest ever reduction in child poverty in a parliament ever,” and he expresses pride in being the chancellor who “lifts half a million kids out of poverty.” He explains the practical implications of this aim as, “That means kids not going to bed hungry. It means kids not waking up in cold and damp homes.” He stresses that he is proud and happy to defend the choices he has made. The interviewer presses again, asking, “Did you lie?” Reeves repeats, “Of course, I didn’t.” The line of questioning returns to the reader’s interpretation that the welfare measures and tax policy were funded by misleading the public, but Reeves stands firm on his denial. The interviewer then asks a clarifying question about the prime minister’s involvement, wondering whether the prime minister was informed throughout the process. Reeves confirms, “Yes. And he was right there with you on it all? Yes. Of course.” This confirms that the prime minister was aware and aligned with the approach and decisions under discussion. The exchange centers on a clash between allegations of deceit regarding tax hikes and welfare funding, and Reeves’s declarative defense of his policy objectives—primarily reducing child poverty and preventing poverty-related harm to children—along with a reiteration that he did not lie and that the prime minister was informed and supportive of the course of action.

Republicans plan to sunset Social Security and Medicare, leaving children responsible for aging relatives' expenses, including medications. Without government help, seniors may become homeless or die from lack of care. Republicans would rather cut costs in the form of services to the people or a safety net for the elderly than fund programs like low cost elder care, home care, meals on wheels, and Medicare. They also don't want prescription drugs to be less expensive, cap seniors' medical costs, fund the IRS to make the rich pay their taxes, or have a minimum corporate tax rate for $1,000,000,000 corporations. Democrats are trying to save these programs and take care of everyone.

A company that never had federal government contracts suddenly received a billion dollars for IT, even though it doesn't do IT and has only 4 employees in a basement cottage headquarters. The speaker questions why this suspicious company started getting contracts exactly 21 days after the prime minister took office. The prime minister's response is that the relevant authorities need to investigate the situation. Meanwhile, the focus on the government's side is on making life more affordable for Canadians, such as attracting healthcare workers, forgiving student loans for rural doctors and nurses, and accelerating housing construction. The conservative party is blocking these initiatives, but the government will continue to support Canadians.

The transcript outlines a message delivered about the upcoming federal budget and a vision for Canada’s future. The speaker states that on November 4 the government will table the first federal budget, described as “our first federal budget.” This budget is presented as the plan to protect communities, protect borders, and safeguard Canadians’ way of life. It is also described as part of a broader strategy to build a stronger economy in which everyone has a chance to get ahead, and to empower Canadians with new opportunities, better careers, and a lower cost of living. Key objectives are emphasized through three interconnected commitments. First, protection and stability are highlighted by the assertion that the plan will protect communities, borders, and the Canadian way of life. Second, economic growth and opportunity are foregrounded through the goal of building a stronger economy where all Canadians have a fair opportunity to advance, accompanied by the aim to empower people with new opportunities, better careers, and a lower cost of living. Third, the message underscores empowerment and opportunity for Canadians in general, reinforcing the idea that the budget is tied to creating these improved conditions for everyday life. There is a viewpoint offered about the global context: “The old world order is disappearing, and a new one has yet to emerge.” This is presented as a backdrop that makes bold action necessary in order to shape Canada’s path in the years ahead. The speaker asserts that times like this require boldness, and that the manner in which the country responds will influence Canada’s trajectory for decades to come. The overall strategy is described as combining domestic and international efforts. Domestically, the plan involves “generational investments at home.” This phrase implies long-term, sustained investments intended to yield lasting benefits for Canadian society and the economy. Internationally, the plan calls for “deeper partnerships abroad,” signaling a commitment to strengthen ties with other countries as part of building Canada’s strength. Ultimately, the message conveys confidence that, through these combined measures—generational investments at home and deeper international partnerships—the result will be a stronger Canada. The speaker concludes that these actions will “build Canada strong,” tying the budget and the broader strategic approach to a durable national resilience and prosperity.

Good morning, everyone. I want to address Bernie Sanders' recent criticism regarding Social Security. He tweeted that one of us has fought to cut Social Security, referencing a 1995 statement of mine about freezing federal spending, including Social Security. However, that context is often overlooked. I was focused on preventing a government shutdown, not cutting benefits. It's surprising to revisit statements from decades ago, especially when they are taken out of context. Throughout my career, I've consistently supported Social Security. I worked with other Democrats to ensure its solvency during the Reagan years. Our obligation is to protect the youngest and oldest among us, and I have never wavered in that commitment.

We can eliminate debt, provide childcare, elder care, and strengthen healthcare. Everyone should have access to the same benefits as during COVID. President Biden is thanked for beating Medicare. President Trump is criticized for destroying it.

As Canada's finance minister, I believe our country has a significant advantage due to our growth. Unlike other wealthy nations, we don't face the same demographic challenge because we are open to immigration. This sets us apart and is a positive aspect for Canada.

The speaker states they will pass the largest tax cuts in American history, relying on Mike and John Thune. They claim they will not cut Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid benefits. The speaker alleges that Democrats would cut these benefits and that if Democrats gained power, the entire economy would collapse, as the country is heading for a collapse.