TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Elon endorsed the speaker and campaigned for them. The speaker believes they would have won Pennsylvania easily, even if the "real governor" or Shapiro had run. The speaker is disappointed because Elon, who initially knew the bill's inner workings and had no problem with it, suddenly developed a problem when he learned about the EV mandate cut. This cut would save billions of dollars but is considered unfair. The speaker wants cars of all types, including electric, gasoline, combustion, and hybrids, and wants to be able to sell everything. Elon became "different" when Congress wanted to cut the EV mandate, which the speaker understands. Elon knew every aspect of the bill better than almost anybody.

The speaker claims that law c 69 guarantees there will not be a one-stop shop because it requires the Canadian government to duplicate regulations. They argue that there should be strong rules enforced once, rather than multiple levels of regulation. The speaker states that it currently takes seventeen years to get a major project approved in Canada. They assert that in the last ten years, Canada has had the worst economic growth and cannot afford a fourth Liberal term.

The speaker begins by expressing their initial lack of bias against electric cars but then reveals some shocking discoveries. They mention that the environmental benefit of electric cars is a lie, as the French environmental agency ADEME states that it takes five years for an electric car to have the same carbon footprint as a traditional car due to the production of batteries. The speaker also highlights the exorbitant cost of electric cars, stating that they are 45-50% more expensive than traditional cars, taking 10-20 years to recoup the savings from not buying fuel. Lastly, the speaker criticizes the European market for giving the Chinese automotive industry a significant advantage, with Chinese cars being 20% cheaper and equally reliable. They conclude by stating that 80% of batteries worldwide are sold by the Chinese.

Electric cars are expensive and will be used to control where people can and cannot go. Unlike traditional cars, autonomous electric cars will be computer-driven and will only take passengers where they are allowed to go. The goal is not to save the planet from climate change, but rather to impose control over people's movements. The idea is to replace petrol and diesel cars with electric ones in order to limit people's freedom and decide where they can travel. The claim of saving the planet is just an excuse.

The speaker believes a dying government is most dangerous in its final months, anticipating unreasonable policies if reelection seems unlikely. These policies would be difficult to undo and could negatively impact the investment community. The speaker is particularly concerned about COP 2029 in Baku, fearing the federal government will grandstand internationally to gain favor with environmental groups, boasting about their actions in Canada. The speaker asserts the federal government lacks constitutional authority over resource management and production pace, which are provincial responsibilities. The speaker suggests taking action now to counter potentially "ridiculous policies" expected to be announced in Baku.

According to Speaker 0, Canada's new prime minister threatened to seize capital from companies not advancing Canada's climate agenda. Speaker 1 stated the goal is for every financial decision to consider climate change, backing companies that are part of the solution and taking capital away from those who are part of the problem. Speaker 0 claims the prime minister is a fan of censorship and threatened American social media platforms, referencing a statement by Speaker 1 that large American online platforms have become seas of hate and are being used by criminals to harm children, and that his government will act. Speaker 0 asserts there is no free speech in Canada and that the prime minister wants to ban social media platforms, shut down dissent, and use the climate crisis as an excuse to steal from businesses and control their means of production. Speaker 0 concludes that while the friendship between the US and Canada will continue, the "free ride" is over.

Thousands of auto dealers are urging President Biden to reconsider the government's electric vehicle (EV) mandate. These dealerships represent various brands and are speaking on behalf of consumers. The problem is that manufacturers are being forced to produce EVs, but consumers are not buying them. Dealerships are now facing a backlog of EV inventory, with up to 12 months' worth of supply. Consumers are hesitant due to concerns about infrastructure and range anxiety. The Biden administration's mandate has put pressure on manufacturers to invest in EV production, but without sufficient consumer demand. Dealerships want the market and infrastructure to evolve naturally, rather than being forced. They are not against EVs and actually make good profits from EV service. The goal is to find a balance between EVs, gas vehicles, and hybrids.

Speaker 0 argues that 100-year-old automotive technology is continually refined and that exhaust from modern cars is cleaner than the air entering the intake in many cities, due to catalytic converters, NOx converters (notably in diesels), computer-controlled fuel injection, and stop-start systems. He claims that there is no justification for restricting petrol cars and contrasts this with restrictions on electric vehicles (EVs). He contends that the EV push is not about encouraging people to switch to EVs for environmental reasons but about driving people out of internal combustion engine (ICE) cars. The EV zero-emission vehicle mandate, he says, forces automotive manufacturers to sell an ever-increasing proportion of EVs each year, and he asserts this will destroy, bankrupt, and reduce mass-manufacturing conglomerates such as Volkswagen, Audi Group, Ford, and others. He cites an example with Volkswagen and Audi: they are not allowed to sell the desired mix of petrol and diesel vehicles because they will be fined £15,000 per car if they fail to sell 28% as EVs. He claims they are already restricting petrol and diesel sales, and notes that this pressure is already in place for 2025. He argues that European carmakers cannot sell many EVs because European cars are more expensive than cheaper Chinese imports. He shifts to a broader geopolitical economic view, stating this is not a mere consumer issue but a plan arranged by global financiers, describing it as a one-two punch: you cannot sell petrol and diesel because of mandates, and your cars are uncompetitive with cheaper Chinese imports. He notes there are 180 Chinese EV makers, with only one or two currently profitable; trade press reports suggest that by the end of the decade, seven to nine of them will be profitable while the rest will have failed. From this, he infers that someone is willing to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to manufacture cars at a loss so they can be delivered to Europe at a loss in order to destroy Europe’s mass-manufacturing capability. He concludes that as a result, there will simply not be enough cars to go around, and ultimately, the mandates will be moot because there will be none available.

The speaker criticizes the leader of the opposition, stating that he believes everything was perfect under the previous conservative government and wants to make Canada great again. However, the speaker argues that Canadians do not share this sentiment. They highlight the leader's past actions as part of Stephen Harper's failed housing minister, including violating the rights of indigenous peoples and neglecting environmental responsibilities. The speaker also mentions the lack of a future environmental and economic plan.

The speaker claims the C40 consortium, composed of 40 of the world's largest cities, is pursuing an agenda that includes limiting citizens to three articles of clothing per year and a 95% reduction in private car ownership. They allege this is why electric cars are being promoted, even though there won't be enough electricity to power them. Additionally, the speaker states the agenda includes one short-haul flight per person every three years, which they believe will decimate the travel and tourism industries. They claim the ultimate goal, though not directly from C40, is an 85% reduction in Western living standards, which they say is deemed necessary by "green virtuous globalist utopians" for a green planet. The speaker believes bureaucrats are using this agenda to advance their careers, and radical leftists are willing to sacrifice the working class and the poor to achieve their ambitions.

Canada's tax system heavily burdens the average worker, with $22,376 taken annually from a $55,000 income through various taxes, including income tax, employment insurance, and property taxes. This leaves only $32,624, which is further diminished by a 13% sales tax, reducing purchasing power to $28,380. Essentially, workers spend half the year working for the government. In return, they face a government that has restricted freedoms, imposed health mandates, and overseen a failing healthcare system, rising crime rates, and homelessness. There are concerns about legislation targeting free speech and plans to eliminate private car ownership by 2030. The current governance is seen as a threat to the freedoms fought for by previous generations.

The speaker expresses concern about silver bullet solutions like electric vehicles receiving too much attention. They highlight the negative impact of the EV boom on cobalt production, leading to human rights abuses in the Democratic Republic of Congo where most cobalt is mined. The speaker criticizes the global north for ignoring these issues.

The speaker claims electric cars are a "con," citing John Kerry's private jet usage. A Jay Leno clip with Joe Biden was filmed at the Secret Service Training Center, where the speaker used to work, suggesting the whole thing is a "schtick." According to an op-ed, there's only enough battery power to power the world for 75 seconds. The speaker analogizes this to a hospital patient on life support. By 2030, the plan is to have enough battery power for only eleven minutes. The speaker believes "liberals" are asking for a solution that doesn't exist. The other speaker agrees, stating that the plan is not well thought out.

The speaker claims the prime minister is a climate zealot and eco extremist. They assert the prime minister has pushed for net-zero banking for decades, intending to prevent banks from investing in oil and gas. The speaker alleges the prime minister plans to increase carbon taxes on the oil and gas industry to eviscerate it, referencing the prime minister's book as evidence. According to the speaker, Canada's national identity, unity, freedom, and future are at a monumental crossroads.

The speaker introduces an amendment to defund a federal mandate requiring all new vehicles after 2026 to be equipped with a kill switch that can disable a vehicle if the driver is deemed to be performing poorly. The speaker argues that this mandate infringes on the fundamental right to travel freely. The opposition claims that the amendment is misleading, as the mandate does not require kill switches but rather passive technology to prevent drunk driving. They argue that this technology saves lives and reduces the burden on police officers. The speaker counters by expressing concerns about privacy, potential dangers, and the violation of constitutional rights.

Mark Carney is allegedly destroying Canada. Starting June 1, vehicles made before February of an unspecified year will be banned. Window tinting will also be prohibited, with a 14-day removal deadline. Lift kits on trucks will no longer be allowed. These policies are described as communist and more extreme than California's. The speaker, who does not live in Canada, expresses sympathy for Canadians and urges Alberta to separate and join the United States.

The speaker states there is agreement that Canada needs more housing, but disagreement on government involvement. The Conservative party leader wants to sell off unused federal lands. The speaker says the federal government owns tons of land in cities and towns across the country and plans to offer up that public land for housing by long-term leasing it, not selling it to developers. Leasing the land allows them to work with communities to ensure the right, affordable homes are built. They state they have land and lots of houses to build.

Biden's push for electric vehicles has resulted in auto workers losing their jobs and car dealerships struggling to sell unwanted EVs. Despite the lack of demand, those who do buy electric vehicles to save on gas are now being targeted by the government for more revenue. This includes placing tracking devices on their cars to monitor their usage. It's frustrating how liberals can support such policies.

By 2035, Canada will mandate that citizens can only purchase electric vehicles due to a change in the Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) quietly put in place by the environmental minister. The mandate stipulates that all vehicles made in Canada must have zero emissions. A speaker argues that the government is overreaching, citing issues such as cold climates, the needs of rural Canadians, and power outages, such as one that occurred in Peterborough three weeks prior, as examples of why the mandate won't work. During the five day outage, electric vehicles were rendered useless. The speaker suggests that families should be able to choose to buy electric vehicles if they want, and the government's role should be to ensure the infrastructure is in place to support them.

The government is considering other options for home heating in the future due to the affordability crisis. The Atlantic caucus has expressed concerns from their constituents, suggesting that more liberals from the prairies should be elected to have a conversation about this. However, the lack of liberals in the prairies currently means that the people of Alberta may have to live a more unaffordable life compared to those in Atlantic Canada. The fairness of this situation is questioned.

Many Canadians want a federal election this year instead of waiting until 2025. In Alberta, there is a desire for an immediate change in the environment minister, Stephen Gebow. The speaker has good relationships with some federal ministers, including Chrystia Freeland, whom they consider a champion for their province.

The speaker discusses the so-called Great Reset, insisting it is not a conspiracy theory and noting that it has been referenced by prime minister Trudeau in a United Nations speech. The speaker explains that Pierre Polyev, the federal conservative finance critic, recently raised concerns about this concept and was criticized by some in the media and by liberals for allegedly promoting conspiracy theories. According to the speaker, the Great Reset is the name of Klaus Schwab’s book. Schwab’s thesis, as described, is that governments and societies should “seize the opportunity of the public health and economic crisis to reimagine the world and radically change policies.” The speaker characterizes the proposed changes as a “grab bag of left wing ideas” that would mean less freedom and more government intervention, including policies that would “create massive poverty,” with particular emphasis on energy policy. Klaus Schwab is identified as the president and founder of the World Economic Forum, also known as the Davos Summit. The speaker labels Davos as “the biggest gathering of global hypocrites in history,” describing it as a ski village in Switzerland where, every February, thousands of wealthy individuals, including billionaires, millionaires, global CEOs, and politicians, fly in with private airplanes to spend a week lecturing the world, including working people, about reducing their carbon footprint. The speaker asserts that the Great Reset is advocated by influential people and even alluded to by Trudeau, though the discussion centers on what the reset entails and how it would impact policy, government power, and energy policy.

The speaker claims that law C-69 guarantees there will not be a one-stop shop because it requires the Canadian government to duplicate regulations. They argue that there should be strong rules enforced once, rather than multiple levels of regulation. The speaker states that it currently takes seventeen years to get a major project approved in Canada. They assert that in the last ten years, Canada has had the worst economic growth and cannot afford a fourth Liberal term.

Over recent months, key policy issues have been raised, emphasizing the importance of conservative perspectives in politics. Canada remains committed to the Paris Agreement, but the government has failed to meet greenhouse gas targets. Immigration is driving population growth, with record newcomers arriving. Concerns about political polarization and the influence of special interest groups on Canadian politics have been voiced. Protests against government mandates and lockdowns highlighted a desire for freedom and unity among Canadians. The need for dialogue on education and parental rights in schools has emerged, with calls to stop perceived indoctrination. A push for revitalizing the economy, protecting freedoms, and addressing immigration is crucial for a brighter future for Canada. Together, there is a call to action to overcome challenges and create a prosperous nation.

Canadians are feeling the impacts of the climate emergency with wildfires and extreme weather. The government spent $34 billion on the Trans Mountain pipeline instead of investing in real climate solutions. Big oil CEOs profit while Canadians struggle. We need a windfall tax on oil and gas profits, regulations to cap emissions, and investments in clean jobs and climate resilience. The current government delays climate action, while conservatives deny the crisis. We need to end fossil fuel subsidies and prioritize real climate solutions.