reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Dave Rubin discusses his recent suspension from Twitter, which he attributes to posting a screenshot of Jordan Peterson's tweet about Ellen Page. He emphasizes the broader issue of censorship and the need for a parallel economy to combat big tech's control over speech. Rubin expresses concern over the chilling effect of such suspensions on free expression, noting that fear of repercussions may deter individuals from speaking the truth. He critiques the media's portrayal of the Supreme Court's decision on abortion, arguing that it merely returns the issue to the states rather than banning it outright. Rubin highlights the hypocrisy of Democrats who claim to protect rights while attempting to undermine the Constitution. He also addresses the political landscape, suggesting that figures like Gavin Newsom are positioning themselves for future presidential runs, despite their failures in governance. Rubin calls out the Democrats' tactics, including calls for violence against Supreme Court justices and the manipulation of public sentiment through fear. He underscores the importance of standing up for individual rights and truth in the face of a perceived authoritarian push from the left. The discussion touches on various political figures and their actions, reinforcing the theme of a battle for freedom and truth in contemporary America.

Unrest and media narratives collide as Tucker Carlson and Jordan Peterson dissect Canada's protest movements, from the Freedom Convoy to broader Western working-class anger. They reference Pierre Poilievre’s stance and a costly residence expense, debate a Canada-US wall proposed by Vivek Ramaswami, and critique Canadian media as lacking creativity. They praise the convoy's timing and discipline, while lamenting political rhetoric that labels dissenters as enemies and questioning Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland’s leadership. They discuss January 6th as fraudulent, trusting gut instincts about deception, and reference the World Economic Forum while describing reactions to media coverage and arrests like David Menzies.

Jordan Peterson and Joe Rogan discuss various societal issues, particularly focusing on the political climate in Canada and the implications of compelled speech laws regarding gender pronouns. Rogan expresses admiration for Canada while criticizing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, whom he refers to as a "Castro lover." Peterson highlights the enforcement of social justice warrior values, particularly around gender identity, and the growing number of invented gender pronouns that individuals are compelled to use. Peterson argues that this trend is part of a larger ideological movement rooted in postmodernism and Marxist doctrine, which he believes reduces human interaction to power dynamics rather than truth-seeking. He emphasizes that categorizing individuals by group identity undermines their individuality and leads to collective guilt, a concept he links to historical atrocities. The conversation shifts to the dangers of ideological possession and the suppression of dissenting opinions in academia, where Peterson notes that the overwhelming majority of professors lean left politically. He warns against the consequences of silence in the face of compelled speech, asserting that the ability to speak truthfully is essential to prevent tyranny. Peterson also discusses the importance of understanding the historical context of ideologies, particularly Marxism, and the catastrophic outcomes of its implementation in the 20th century. He argues that many young people are drawn to these ideologies out of a desire for social justice but fail to recognize the historical failures associated with them. The discussion touches on the role of universities in perpetuating these ideologies and the financial burdens placed on students through student loans. Peterson advocates for self-authoring programs that help individuals articulate their life goals and confront their past, emphasizing the need for personal responsibility and self-improvement. Rogan and Peterson explore the nature of truth, the significance of religious narratives, and the balance between order and chaos in society. Peterson argues that religious stories serve as archetypes for understanding human behavior and morality, while also cautioning against the dangers of dogmatism. The conversation concludes with Peterson encouraging listeners to sort themselves out before attempting to change the world, highlighting the importance of personal development and the articulation of one's beliefs. He invites people to engage with his self-authoring program as a means of taking responsibility for their lives and contributing positively to society.

The discussion between Jordan Peterson and Rex Murphy centers on the political climate in Canada under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, particularly regarding his handling of the trucker convoy protests and the Emergencies Act. Murphy highlights the negative international perception of Canada, noting that both Americans and Europeans are shocked by Trudeau's actions, including the freezing of bank accounts linked to the protests. He criticizes Trudeau for his comments on the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions, suggesting they reflect a lack of diplomatic wisdom and an irresponsible approach to international relations. Murphy expresses concern over the collusion between the Trudeau government and the media, arguing that the press has become a tool for government propaganda rather than an independent check on power. He discusses Bill C-11, which he believes threatens free speech by imposing government control over internet content. The conversation also touches on the economic consequences of Trudeau's policies, including rising inflation and supply chain disruptions, exacerbated by his energy policies that undermine Canadian oil and gas industries. Murphy concludes that the lack of opposition within Parliament, particularly from the NDP, and the media's failure to hold the government accountable contribute to a troubling political landscape in Canada, where civil liberties are at risk and the government operates without sufficient checks and balances.

Dave Rubin discusses the upcoming State of the Union address, expressing skepticism about President Biden's ability to deliver it effectively. He shares a satirical video depicting Biden's preparation, suggesting that the president undergoes medical treatments to function. Rubin then shifts focus to Canada, highlighting concerns over Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's internet censorship bill, C-11, which has passed the Senate. This bill allows the government to manipulate social media algorithms, limiting what Canadians can see online. Many content creators oppose it, arguing it undermines free speech. Rubin connects Trudeau's authoritarian policies to broader global trends, including the United Nations' push for stricter controls on speech. He emphasizes that censorship is a means to control culture and information, which he believes is essential for maintaining power. He critiques the Biden administration for its role in flagging misinformation on social media, framing it as an attack on the First Amendment. Rubin also addresses the generational divide in politics, criticizing older leaders like Biden and Trump for not stepping aside for younger candidates. He argues that the current political climate is influenced by cultural control, with figures like Trudeau and media personalities promoting divisive narratives. He concludes by advocating for a return to foundational American ideals and encourages viewers to engage with his content on various platforms.

As 2024 approaches, Jordan Peterson reflects on the past year, highlighting significant events and discussions. He addresses ongoing scrutiny from the College of Psychologists of Ontario, which has pursued him for years based on complaints from non-clients regarding his social media comments. He critiques the regulatory board's handling of complaints and discusses the absurdity of their actions, including a potential re-education process. Peterson also critiques Canada's Bill C63, which aims to protect children from online predators but includes concerning provisions about hate speech. He emphasizes the dangers of government overreach and the subjective nature of defining hate speech. He expresses concern over the state of free speech in Canada and other countries, noting the rise of authoritarian laws. He praises Katherine Birbalsingh, head of the Michaela School in the UK, for her success in education despite facing opposition from the left. He discusses the importance of responsibility and self-sacrifice in multicultural communities, arguing that division based on identity undermines societal cohesion. Peterson reflects on the broader cultural landscape, noting the decline of the atheist movement and the need for a revitalization of Judeo-Christian values. He emphasizes the importance of storytelling and the role of education in shaping understanding. He concludes by expressing gratitude for his audience and the support received throughout the year, indicating plans for future projects and continued engagement with pressing societal issues.

In this episode of Uncommon Knowledge, Peter Robinson interviews Jordan Peterson, discussing the polarized views surrounding Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the trucker protests against COVID restrictions. Peterson, who gained fame for opposing legislation on gender pronouns, critiques Trudeau's portrayal of the protests, arguing that the prime minister misrepresents the situation for political gain. He emphasizes that Canadians are faced with a choice between believing their institutions are corrupt or accepting unfounded claims about foreign influence in the protests. Peterson reflects on his departure from academia, citing the ideological demands of diversity statements and the challenges faced by students in a politically charged environment. He explores the rise of wokeness in universities, attributing it to a blend of postmodernism and Marxism, which he believes undermines competence and justice. The conversation shifts to the importance of free speech and thought, asserting that societies thrive on the ability to engage in open discourse. Peterson argues that the divine value of the individual is essential for democracy and that without a transcendent standard, people may succumb to nihilism. He warns against demoralizing youth with messages of inherent corruption, advocating instead for the recognition of individual potential and responsibility.

Dave Rubin discusses the failures of political leaders in 2022, particularly targeting Justin Trudeau and Volodymyr Zelensky. He criticizes Trudeau for imposing gun control despite Canada not having a significant gun violence issue, emphasizing Trudeau's authoritarian tendencies and the backlash from Canadians against his policies. Rubin also highlights Zelensky's recent address to Congress, questioning the U.S. financial support for Ukraine, which has exceeded $69 billion, while American infrastructure needs remain unmet. He critiques Zelensky's uncompromising stance on peace negotiations with Russia, suggesting that a more pragmatic approach might be necessary given the geopolitical realities. Rubin expresses skepticism about the motivations of U.S. politicians, who seem to prioritize foreign interests over domestic concerns. He concludes by urging viewers to remain vigilant and engaged, emphasizing the importance of truth and accountability in politics as they move into 2023.

Joe Rogan welcomes Jordan Peterson back to the podcast, noting that Peterson seems to be handling considerable stress. They discuss Peterson's recent denial of a grant, which he suspects may be related to his outspoken criticism of political correctness. Peterson expresses concern about the increasing taboo surrounding certain topics in academia, particularly in the humanities and social sciences. They recount an incident at McMaster University where Peterson was disrupted by protesters during a speech, highlighting the chaotic environment and the inability to engage in meaningful dialogue with those opposing him. Peterson reflects on the nature of the protesters, suggesting they are often in a trance-like state, unable to see him as a human being. He notes that while he tries to communicate with them, the interaction is largely one-sided. Rogan and Peterson discuss the implications of political correctness and the rise of social justice movements, with Peterson arguing that these movements often lack a genuine understanding of the complexities of human behavior and history. He criticizes the tendency to label dissenting opinions as hate speech and the failure to engage in constructive dialogue. Peterson shares his views on the importance of truth and responsibility, emphasizing that individuals must confront their own potential for malevolence to achieve personal growth. He argues that the current societal climate, characterized by chaos and a lack of clear values, has led to a crisis of meaning, particularly among young men. They explore the idea of universal basic income as a potential response to the erosion of jobs due to automation and artificial intelligence, questioning how society would adapt to such changes. Peterson expresses uncertainty about the future, acknowledging the challenges posed by rapid technological advancements and the need for individuals to find purpose and meaning in their lives. Throughout the conversation, Peterson emphasizes the importance of personal responsibility, the dangers of ideological thinking, and the necessity of confronting uncomfortable truths. He advocates for a return to individual agency and the pursuit of meaningful goals as a way to navigate the complexities of modern life.

Julie Ponesse and Jordan Peterson discuss the ongoing trucker protests in Ottawa, emphasizing the peaceful nature of the demonstrations and the importance of maintaining civility amidst rising tensions. Peterson encourages the truckers to remain calm and avoid violence, highlighting their role in fostering community and addressing social issues like homelessness. He critiques the media's portrayal of the protests, arguing that it misrepresents the truckers as extremists rather than recognizing their legitimate grievances against mandates. Peterson points out the disconnect between political leaders and the populace, suggesting that politicians have become isolated and unresponsive to the concerns of ordinary Canadians. He expresses concern over the political and media collusion that undermines free speech and civil liberties, particularly criticizing the blocking of GoFundMe funding for the truckers as a dangerous precedent. The conversation touches on broader themes of privilege, compassion, and the moral obligations that come with it, asserting that true virtue involves action rather than mere sympathy. Peterson concludes by urging the truckers to embody decency and to reassure those fearful of the situation, emphasizing the need for unity and constructive dialogue in the face of adversity.

The discussion centers on the implications of Canadian Bill C63, which is viewed as an extension of previous legislation, particularly Bill C16. The guests, Bruce Pardy and Konstantin Kisin, explore how C63 represents a shift from the rule of law to rule by law, where laws become tools for government control rather than established principles. Pardy explains that C63 introduces severe restrictions on free speech under the guise of protecting children from online harm, while also reinstating problematic sections of the Canadian Human Rights Act that could chill speech. The bill allows for anonymous denunciations, raising concerns about the potential for misuse and the erosion of due process. The conversation highlights the subjective nature of defining hate speech and the dangers of empowering bureaucracies with vague authority. Kisin draws parallels to similar trends in the UK, where legislation often expands beyond its stated purpose, leading to increased censorship and control. Both guests express concern over the ideological shift in legal frameworks, where the focus has moved from protecting individual rights to enforcing group outcomes. They argue that this trend undermines the foundational principles of freedom and responsibility, suggesting that the administrative state is increasingly dictating societal norms without accountability. The discussion concludes with a call for a return to the principles of individual autonomy and the rule of law, emphasizing the need for clarity and restraint in legislation to prevent tyranny.

The discussion centers on the implications of restricting speech deemed harmful and the potential for abuse of such mandates. Jordan Peterson recounts his disinvitation from Cambridge University in 2019 due to a photograph with an individual wearing a controversial t-shirt, which led to a broader conversation about free speech in academia. Dr. James Orr and Dr. Arif Ahmed, both professors at Cambridge, reflect on the positive response to Peterson's upcoming return and the changes in university policies regarding speaker invitations. Ahmed highlights the fear among university authorities of protests and reputational damage, suggesting that a small group of ideologically driven individuals can create a false impression of a dominant orthodoxy. He also discusses the problematic nature of anonymous reporting systems that circumvent due process, emphasizing the chilling effect they have on free speech. The conversation touches on the importance of resilience in education, arguing that universities should challenge students rather than protect them from discomfort. They express hope for a cultural shift towards greater willingness to engage in open dialogue, citing a successful vote to amend free speech policies at Cambridge. The discussion concludes with concerns about the creeping influence of totalitarianism in mid-level bureaucracies and the need for institutional support for free speech initiatives.

Jordan Peterson discusses the impact of biblical translations on literacy and the historical relationship between science and religion. He expresses concern about the Ontario College of Psychologists, which has pursued him with complaints regarding his social media communications, labeling them as unprofessional conduct. Peterson refuses to comply with mandated re-education lessons, viewing them as an infringement on his rights and a reflection of a corrupt system influenced by "woke ideology." He emphasizes the importance of truth in navigating complex situations and shares his experiences with ongoing complaints since 2016, which he believes are politically motivated and not based on actual harm caused to clients. Peterson highlights the absurdity of the complaints, which include retweeting political figures and criticizing public policies. He notes that none of the complaints come from actual clients, raising questions about the legitimacy of the college's actions. He plans to make all correspondence public to allow for transparency and public scrutiny. Peterson warns that the regulatory bodies in Canada have become weaponized against professionals with conservative views, creating a climate of fear among working professionals. He reflects on the broader implications for society, urging Canadians to recognize the erosion of trust in public institutions and the dangers of ideological conformity in professional settings. Peterson concludes by expressing his determination to fight back against these accusations and to uphold his right to practice psychology.

The discussion centers around the perceived authoritarian nature of climate change agendas and the manipulation of public fear to gain control over individual freedoms. The hosts argue that claims about impending disasters are often exaggerated to justify increased government intervention and taxation. They reference past statements from politicians like AOC about limited time to act on climate change, suggesting these are tactics to instill hysteria and garner support for policies that may not be effective. The conversation shifts to trust in institutions, with one host asserting that people inherently trust systems like law enforcement, while the other challenges this notion, highlighting inconsistencies in leftist views on authority. They discuss how authoritarianism can creep in gradually, using examples from the COVID-19 pandemic to illustrate how governments tested public compliance with restrictions. The hosts also critique the World Economic Forum's agenda, particularly regarding digital IDs and central bank digital currencies, arguing these measures could lead to increased government control over personal lives. They express concerns about immigration policies and their implications for public safety, citing recent incidents involving illegal immigrants. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes a growing skepticism towards government authority and the potential dangers of unchecked power, advocating for individual rights and freedoms in the face of increasing regulation and control.

Justin Trudeau associates authoritarianism with allowing misinformation on social media, contradicting the principle of free expression essential for societal truth.

The discussion centers on Ontario's Bill 67, the Racial Equity in the Education System Act, which introduces an ideology into the educational framework, shifting focus from traditional educational goals to social justice and anti-racism. Jordan Peterson and Rex Murphy argue that this bill undermines the core purpose of education, which should be to develop individual competencies in literacy, numeracy, and critical thinking. They express concern that the bill promotes group identity over individual merit, labeling those who disagree as racist. The legislation mandates anti-racism training for teachers and establishes a framework for monitoring and addressing perceived racism, creating a quasi-judicial system that lacks due process. Peterson highlights the absurdity of requiring teachers to demonstrate anti-racism awareness, questioning the validity of such assessments. They criticize the bill for fostering a culture of compliance and ideological conformity, warning that it could lead to authoritarianism in educational settings. The hosts call for public awareness and resistance against these developments, urging Canadians to reflect on the implications of such legislation for the future of education.

In this podcast episode, Jordan Peterson discusses the complexities surrounding free speech, gender identity, and the consequences of social media interactions, particularly focusing on his past comments regarding Elliot Page and other contentious topics. He reflects on his 2016 videos criticizing Canada's Bill C-16, which he believes intruded on free speech and contributed to a psychogenic epidemic among vulnerable young women. Peterson shares the severe backlash he has faced, including investigations by the College of Psychologists of Ontario and a recent Twitter suspension for allegedly deadnaming Elliot Page. Peterson acknowledges the harshness of his tone on social media, particularly Twitter, where he feels compelled to express outrage over issues like gender identity and related medical interventions. He discusses the emotional toll of public criticism and the impact of social media on discourse, noting that it often fosters mob behavior and dehumanization. He emphasizes the need for a more constructive dialogue and reflects on feedback from colleagues who suggest that his approach may alienate potential allies. The conversation shifts to specific tweets that have drawn criticism, including his remarks about Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a plus-sized model on the cover of Sports Illustrated, and Elliot Page's transition. Peterson argues that his comments were intended to critique broader societal trends rather than target individuals personally. He grapples with the implications of his words, recognizing the responsibility that comes with his platform and the potential harm caused by his statements. Throughout the discussion, Peterson is joined by Greg Hurwitz and Jonathan Pageau, who provide perspectives from the left and emphasize the importance of maintaining a respectful dialogue. They explore the nuances of identity politics, the role of social media in shaping public perception, and the challenges of navigating complex cultural issues without resorting to divisive rhetoric. Peterson ultimately expresses a desire to improve his communication style and engage in more thoughtful discussions, acknowledging the need for humility and responsibility in addressing sensitive topics. He concludes by thanking his guests for their willingness to engage in this difficult conversation, highlighting the importance of bridging divides and fostering understanding across differing viewpoints.

In an unscripted discussion, Dave Rubin and Jordan Peterson address the implications of recent political events and free speech issues. Rubin reflects on the election, suggesting that the enthusiasm of the Trump base contrasted with the lack of enthusiasm from the Hillary base, leading to a surprising outcome. He views this as a win for their movement against social justice ideologies, emphasizing individual judgment over group identity. Rubin believes there is an opportunity for collaboration across political lines and that Trump’s populism might yield positive outcomes, such as infrastructure improvements. Peterson discusses Canada’s Bill C-16, which adds gender identity and expression to protected categories, making failure to use preferred pronouns potentially a hate crime. He argues that this legislation undermines free speech and could lead to a culture of compelled speech. Peterson expresses concern over the rise of political correctness and its historical parallels to totalitarian regimes. He emphasizes the importance of individual responsibility and truth-telling as a means to combat ideological oppression. Both Rubin and Peterson advocate for a return to individualism and the rejection of collectivist ideologies, urging listeners to engage in honest discourse and personal accountability.

In November 2021, Jordan Peterson engaged in a productive discussion with Dr. Richard Dawkins, an esteemed evolutionary biologist and prominent atheist. Their conversation began abruptly and covered a wide range of topics, including the complexities of compelled speech laws and the implications of gender identity debates. Peterson expressed his opposition to Canada's Bill C-16, which mandated pronoun use, framing it as an issue of compelled speech rather than a transgender rights issue. He highlighted the intimidation faced by individuals in academia and corporate environments who fear repercussions for expressing conservative views. Dawkins and Peterson discussed the role of sexual selection in evolution, particularly its impact on human development and behavior. They explored the idea that human consciousness and perception are shaped by evolutionary processes, with Peterson suggesting that consciousness might influence biological being through sexual selection. The conversation also touched on the nature of truth, with Peterson asserting that objective truths exist and are essential for scientific inquiry, while Dawkins emphasized the importance of pragmatism in understanding truth. They examined the intersection of science and religion, with Dawkins expressing skepticism about the existence of a supernatural creator, while Peterson argued for the significance of a metaphysical commitment to truth. The dialogue concluded with reflections on consciousness, intelligence, and the potential for AI to replicate human thought processes, leaving open questions about the nature of consciousness and its relationship to matter.