TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I looked into Norm Eisen's NGO, State United Democracies Center, which is full of prominent figures. This organization receives $17 million in private donations. After researching, the only thing I could find that they did with the money was produce a low-quality Muppet show. All the videos they created with these knockoff puppets have less than 200 views. It makes you wonder, with all those famous names involved, is that the best thing they could do with $17 million? The result is awful; Jim Henson would be rolling in his grave. They didn't even promote the videos with ads. So, where did the $17 million go?

I have love and respect for Quavo as an artist. It's sad to see him taking money to support Kamala Harris. Megan Thee Stallion and Quavo likely got paid to attend an event. It's disappointing. If Trump did the same, people would be upset.

I received an email offering $1500 for anti-Trump content on TikTok. The campaign is funded by FutureForward, a super PAC supporting Biden and Harris. They aim to create division online by attacking Trump supporters. Despite the money offered, I refuse to compromise my values.

My For You page is filled with presidential campaign content and discussions about AI. Recently, I received a paid promotion offer to create a TikTok video supporting the Democratic side. The email mentioned sending an NDA to get started. Many people form their views based on what influencers say, but it's important to remember that they might be compensated for their opinions.

The speaker received an email from someone claiming to be from the Democratic Party, offering to pay them to post positive videos about Joe Biden. The speaker, who is critical of the current economy, replied that they know nothing about the economy or politics and would rather stay out of it. The party then asked how much it would cost, and the speaker jokingly replied with a high amount. The party agreed to pay the requested amount, but the speaker ultimately decided not to do it.

According to the speaker, the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, roughly 15 or 16 years old, equates money with freedom of expression, allowing billionaires to spend unlimited amounts to influence elections. The speaker believes this is the Supreme Court's worst decision. As a result of the decision, Elon Musk spent $270 million to elect Trump as president. The speaker believes it's absurd for one person to have that much influence. Someone spent $1.5 billion on the Harris campaign over a couple of months. The speaker clarifies that this issue is not limited to Republicans.

I have been accused of being paid for my vaccination videos on social media, but I am not. I want to know who is paying others for these videos and why I am not benefiting. I am open to being paid in Bitcoin if the global elite decides to pay me. Let me know if you pay in Bitcoin.

There is a lot of money pouring into Kamala Harris' campaign, with a Swiss billionaire named Hans Georg Weiss contributing $20 million through 1.6 million individual donations from 400,000 donors. Allegations of fraud are now surfacing due to the scale of these donations.

Hello, I have no idea where the $20 million went. Can you ask Beyoncé to call me back? She owes me since she didn’t perform. Cardi, you didn’t help me get elected, so I think you should pay me back. Don’t hang up! I’m serious. Nancy, stop calling me! Didn’t you retire? Can you teach me about the stock market? I’m in a financial pickle. Maybe I shouldn’t have said that. It’s all Big Mike’s fault. By the way, Whoopi, are you hiring?

Kamala Harris is allegedly paying people to attend rallies. The speaker claims to have proof of this through a Casting Network billboard. The billboard sought nonunion actors for a Democratic event, offering payment, a per diem for meals and transportation, and coverage of flight and other expenses. The submissions were due the day before the speaker discussed it. The speaker believes this shows that the Harris campaign's ground game is a facade, as they are willing to pay for people to attend rallies.

The speaker claims the Democratic party is paying TikTok users thousands of dollars to create content promoting the party, and that they were offered nearly $15,000 to do so. They also claim to have seen mutuals posting content aligned with these pitches within 48 hours, without disclosing they were paid. The speaker says they received two pitches: one for ongoing monthly videos leading up to the election, and another to fearmonger about Project 2025 and the Heritage Foundation. They criticize the Democratic party for allegedly using fearmongering tactics with bad information. The speaker notes that Heritage Foundation trustees are endorsing both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, and that Barack Obama previously worked with them. They state that one pitch instructed them to not directly say "vote for Kamala Harris for legal purposes." The speaker says they are informing viewers that people are being paid to create political content.

When you see celebrities promoting Kamala Harris, know they are often paid to do so. I've been approached multiple times with offers to promote her, using the same talking points. Recently, I saw Chrishell from Selling Sunset post a similar message without disclosing it was a paid promotion. This feels like propaganda, and I find it troubling that it's not considered illegal during an election. I was offered $25,000 for a few Instagram stories but chose not to take it. With the election approaching, I couldn't support something that felt wrong, especially when I believe we can improve health and food safety in America. I resonate with RFK Jr.'s views and refuse to let others suffer as I once did.

Merry Christmas! This has been a long time coming. I realized my disillusionment when I saw $2.5 billion wasted, with no accountability. Oprah received $2.5 million for production costs she could have covered herself, and $450,000 was spent on Kamala Harris' face on a sphere, which was pointless. Donors feel burned, and I'm not alone in this sentiment. Since my announcement, the response has been intense, with excommunication and public shaming from those who claim they're not a cult. It's overwhelming, so I've disabled comments on social media. As for my future, it's all happening quickly. I might attend the inauguration, and I've been contacted by someone from Team Trump, who has been kinder than the DNC ever was. That speaks volumes.

Beyoncé was paid tens of thousands by the Harris campaign to give a speech that didn't resonate, leading to Kamala Harris getting booed. Cardi B's production company was also compensated for her appearance, despite her claims otherwise. Other celebrities like Katy Perry, Christina Aguilera, and Oprah were paid as well, with Oprah receiving $2 million through her production company, Harpo. Al Sharpton was paid $500,000 just before interviewing Harris, and journalist Roland Martin received $350,000 for his interview. Additionally, the Pennsylvania Democratic Party was allocated $25 million after complaints about insufficient funding.

My TikTok feed is full of presidential campaign content, including influencers being paid to promote certain political views. I recently got an email offering payment to make a video supporting the Democratic side. Influencers may be paid to share opinions, so be cautious about where you get your information.

I've been looking into Norm Eisen's NGO, State United Democracies Center, which has prominent figures like Janet Napolitano and Michael Steele involved. This organization received $17 million in private donations, and after digging around, all I could find was that they produced a low-quality Muppet show. The puppet videos have less than 200 views each. With such notable people involved and a budget of $17 million, it's shocking that their main project seems to be this poorly received Muppet series. They didn't even try to promote the videos. I wonder where the $17 million went?

Okay, so this Reuters thing is way bigger than we thought. Elon Musk mentioned Reuters getting government payments, and it goes deeper. I checked out usaspending.gov and found over 41 payments to Reuters. When you look this up on USAspending.gov, you can see all the individual payments yourself. Also, there is a graph at the bottom of the page, and the numbers are insane! We seriously need answers about this.

I'm curious why Angelina Jolie received $20 million from USAID and remains on the US government's payroll, especially since she hasn't been publicly active in the last decade. I remember when she used to go to Congress for humanitarian aid causes, but it seems like there's been no activity recently. It's always interesting to see celebrities advocate in Congress, especially when their faces are used in advertisements soon after. Celebrities don't usually work for free. Besides Jolie, other celebrities like Dennis Quaid, Ben Affleck, Kerry Washington, Gabrielle Union, Ashton Kutcher, Nick Jonas, and Sophia Bush have also been to Congress for special interest groups, so it wouldn't be surprising if they were compensated too. Sophia Bush recently urged people to resist this administration after telling federal employees to comply with the mandates in 2020.

I apologize to Democrats. Tomorrow, during the Super Bowl, Elon Musk will run three commercials exposing what you've been voting for. For those who defended Kamala Harris, I look forward to your reaction when you see twenty years of Democrats' actions with your money. Their support of questionable policies was to keep you in the dark, but now the truth is out. How will you feel defending a party that has been stealing from and lying to you? I can't wait to see the fallout tomorrow.

The richest man in the world is spending $1,000,000 to help Donald Trump buy an election.

Bill Gates donated $5 billion to his own foundation and received a tax write-off for it. This raises questions about the corruption within the government.

A drag queen received an email from Pallet Media offering $1500 for anti-Trump TikTok content. The creator brief outlined "do's and don'ts," including avoiding any support for Donald Trump and his allies, praising Harris and her allies, and attacking Trump supporters' intellectual or personal values. The drag queen investigated the offer, inquiring if it was for the Kamala campaign or a PAC campaign. They discovered the campaign was with FutureForward, described as one of the biggest super PACs with hundreds of millions of dollars.

A number of celebrities, including Cardi B, LeBron James, Martha Stewart, Taylor Swift, Ellen DeGeneres, Beyonce, Ben Stiller, Oprah Winfrey, Madonna, Jay-Z, Jennifer Lopez, and Leonardo DiCaprio, have recently come out in support of Kamala Harris. It raises the question of whether their support is genuine or if they feel pressured to endorse her. What could they possibly have in common that drives this collective backing?

A creator states they were paid for their flight and given access to an event, but denies needing a DNC budget to travel the country and "drag MAGA." They claim their own credit card allows them to "drag fascists" and that they don't need DNC, MAGA, or social money. The creator mentions right-wing influencer Kim Higbee, who believes both right and left-wing influencers should get paid. Speaker 1 claims Kamala and the DNC are paying people upwards of $1500 for 60-second clips backing Trump. The creator denies being paid to criticize Trump, stating they've been doing it for free for four years and that it's easy to find people who dislike Trump. They assert there's no need to pay people to discuss election fraud or other problems related to Trump.

I just spoke with some Republican members who are frustrated with Musk's involvement in political discussions. They are upset about his threats on X regarding primaries and feel he shouldn't interfere in the processes of elected officials. It's important to remember that Musk is not an elected representative; despite his wealth, he has no mandate from the public.