TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses a WHO meeting in December 2019 where vaccine safety was questioned. It was revealed that there is no scientific proof that vaccines are safe and effective when used together. This realization exposed a 100-year bluff, leaving many concerned about the lack of evidence for vaccine safety. The cost and affordability of vaccines were also highlighted as a significant issue for families.

The speaker, a former pharmaceutical sales rep, shares their disillusionment with the industry after discovering corruption and falsified safety data. They recount their experience with vaccines and their concerns about the lack of rigorous safety studies and the toxic additives, such as aluminum, in childhood vaccines. The speaker highlights the high rates of illness in American children compared to other developed countries and attributes it to the profit-driven nature of the pharmaceutical industry. They discuss the influence of pharmaceutical companies on the media and the lack of liability for vaccine manufacturers. The speaker emphasizes the need for more research and information before mandating vaccines, citing the potential risks involved.

We've already taken out and are in the process of taking out mercury and aluminum now. You know what mercury is? You know what aluminum is? Who the hell wants that pumped into a body? And there were rumors about both of them for a long time, but, we're having them taken out. We're having them taken out of the vaccines.

According to the speaker, most vaccines have never been tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate their safety. The speaker claims that vaccines contain aluminum compounds because many dead vaccines don't mount an immune response without them. The speaker alleges that in a Gardasil vaccine study, the placebo group received an aluminum adjuvant instead of a true placebo, resulting in similar side effect profiles between the active vaccine and placebo groups. The speaker asserts that Merck used a novel aluminum compound and that data suggests aluminum in vaccines is profoundly toxic. The speaker states that the only true randomized controlled trial involving a vaccine was conducted on sheep with blue tongue disease. The results allegedly showed that the aluminum in the vaccine was toxic, causing the sheep to become sick, unsociable, and, in some cases, die. The speaker concludes that the assumption that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines are safe is unfounded and has never been tested.

Hepatitis B is contracted through sexual activity and IV drug use. The speaker believes babies do not need the hepatitis B vaccine. The hepatitis B vaccine contains 250 micrograms of aluminum. The speaker states that after Thimerosal was removed from vaccines, the hepatitis B vaccine was moved from being given to teenagers to newborns. The speaker claims the amount of aluminum in the vaccine is five times the adult daily maximum.

Vaccine makers convened at a WHO symposium, but the speaker is not shocked. The speaker anticipates discussion, but not action to remove aluminum. Aluminum adjuvants are the only quick and cheap option for producing hundreds of millions of vaccine doses. Therefore, vaccine makers will not eliminate it. The speaker believes the decision made was to shut down Chris Exley.

Bill Gates and the WHO have promoted the DTP vaccine, but the speaker claims it was withdrawn in the 1980s in the US due to causing brain damage, according to an NIH/UCLA study, and replaced with a safer but less effective DTaP vaccine. The speaker alleges that while essentially banned for white children worldwide, Gates and the WHO gave it to African and Asian children. The Danish government requested a study proving the vaccine saved lives, but Gates was allegedly unable to provide one. A Danish study in Africa, examining 30 years of vaccination records, purportedly found that girls who received the DTP vaccine were 10 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children, not from the targeted diseases, but from conditions like anemia, bilharzia, malaria, dysentery, and pneumonia. The speaker concludes that the vaccine was killing more people than the diseases it was intended to prevent. The speaker asserts this issue stems from a lack of placebo-controlled trials in vaccinology.

That there is a movement among our secretary, Kennedy, and others in the anti vax movement to take alum out of vaccines. It's used in about seven different pediatric vaccines, including one by Pfizer as an adjuvant, so it helps stimulate an immune response. So they want to force manufacturers, I believe, to reformulate those vaccines. That would be a major issue because this is a very safe ingredient, it's been used for seventy years, there's really no alternative. If they force manufacturers to have to reformulate all those pediatric vaccines, I think you'd see a lot of vaccines potentially come off the market because there is no good alternative. Meaning that they would no longer be effective, they wouldn't stimulate the immune?

Speaker 0 states his position on vaccines has changed because he learned how they are produced. He had assumed they were produced reasonably, but discovered safety work had not been done. He says that in a book he completed in 2019, he listed vaccination as one of medicine's three great achievements, along with surgery and antibiotics. He now believes the mechanisms used by vaccine manufacturers and the methods used to obscure safety signals invalidate the products. Discovering that vaccines use a trick to hyper-activate the immune system to work, he questioned its safety and its connection to allergies. Speaker 0 says injecting aluminum to hyper-activate the immune system should come with instructions about what to avoid eating or seasons to avoid the shot, to minimize the likelihood of triggering the immune system to react to something that is not a pathogen. Speaker 1 summarizes this by saying the vaccine opens up the body so that anything present at the time can trigger an immune response.

A study out of Denmark claims aluminum in vaccines is safe, but the speaker argues the methodology is flawed. The study excluded children who died before age two, or had pre-existing conditions like congenital rubella syndrome, respiratory conditions, primary immune deficiency, or heart or liver failure. The study compared children who received slightly different amounts of aluminum, lacking a true placebo group of unvaccinated children. The study also excluded children who received what they deemed an "implausible" number of vaccines. According to the speaker, this number is exceeded by the standard US vaccine schedule by age two for DTaP, Haemophilus influenza, and pneumococcal vaccines. The speaker concludes the study's findings are not applicable to children in the United States and anticipates a rebuttal from scientists who study aluminum's neurotoxicity.

The speaker is frustrated because they received an important video that they can't share due to it being blocked on various platforms. They then introduce another speaker who discusses the concerns about aluminum nanoparticles in vaccines. The speaker explains that these nanoparticles can enter the brain and potentially cause neurodevelopmental disabilities, including Alzheimer's. They argue that the safety of aluminum nanoparticles in vaccines has not been properly evaluated and that vaccine ingredients can enter the brain. The speaker also mentions the link between vaccines and chronic inflammation, as well as the rise in neurodevelopmental disabilities, autoimmune diseases, and seizures. They conclude by stating that vaccines have not been effectively studied and are not as safe as claimed.

Speaker 0 shows a metal container described as a “thimerosal bomb,” noting they keep it because they are a little afraid of it, and it is a very fine powder. Speaker 2 states that thimerosal is labeled very toxic and has cumulative effects, capable of causing damage to the kidneys, respiratory system, skin, and nervous system. It specifically warns of reproductive and developmental toxicity, meaning it can cause things like autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. They emphasize that this is immensely toxic stuff. Speaker 0 notes that thimerosal is present in a vaccine. Speaker 2 explains that thimerosal is used in a whole range of products, with vaccines being a major example because it is directly injected. They reference the tetanus vaccine, noting a vial that expires and contains thimerosal as a preservative. They claim that thimerosal has been a big exposure issue in the United States, especially with the influenza vaccine, which is now recommended for all pregnant women, all infants, and all children on a yearly basis. Speaker 1 adds a point about how thimerosal is added: it is not something added at the end after production but is incorporated because the factory is not clean and not sterile. They argue that either there must be an expensive sterile factory that does not need thimerosal or one that produces thimerosal, and that thimerosal would need to be used throughout production. They assert that the use of thimerosal needs to be stopped. Speaker 2 identifies the influenza vaccine from Adventist Pasture, “their flu zone,” and states that it contains twenty-five micrograms of mercury per dose. Speaker 1 discusses personal experience, noting that many people did not know about thimerosal. They reveal they have given 2,000 RhoGAM shots and have been in vaccines for thirty-five years, and they did not know that RhoGAM contained thimerosal. They suggest that many doctors were unaware that the term “thimerosal” referred to mercury.

Speaker 0 describes a study on the hepatitis B vaccine, stating it is loaded with mercury during the first thirty days of life and comparing infants who received it in that period to those who did not or who received it later. He claims that the relative risk of smoking a pack a day for twenty years leading to lung cancer is ten, with a figure of 11.35, and attributes this to Thimerosal. Speaker 1 asks if the claim is about Thimerosal, and Speaker 0 confirms, then recounts a story that motivated his involvement: a “secret meeting” held to avoid on-campus exposure to freedom of information requests. The meeting occurred at Simpson Wood, a remote Methodist retreat center on the Chattahoochee River in Norcross, Georgia. Over two days, 52 attendees included major vaccine companies, regulatory agencies (WHO, CDC, FDA, NIH, HHS), and leaders in academic vaccinology. Megan recorded the first day, and Speaker 0 says he obtained the transcripts in 2005, calling them horrific. He invites listeners to read them on the Children’s Health Events site to judge for themselves, arguing the transcripts reveal “panjarums of the American healthcare system” and that regulators claimed the science was bulletproof while suggesting vaccines cause autism. Speaker 1 notes that Speaker 0 has previously claimed the conference revealed that vaccines cause autism and that data should be buried, referencing a January 2011 Rolling Stone article and a Salon piece that later withdrew the article. He mentions an eighteen-month US Senate committee investigation that found allegations of CDC misconduct unsubstantiated and concluded there was no cover-up. Speaker 0 clarifies it was a two-year committee hearing led by Senator Burton at the Governmental Oversight Committee, and asserts that vaccines do cause autism, while encouraging listeners to research the science themselves rather than trust him or the organizations cited. Speaker 0 then attacks the credibility and funding of CDC, NIH, and the American Academy of Pediatrics, claiming they are “bought and paid for,” with statistics he cites: FDA is funded 45% by the pharmaceutical industry; the AAP allegedly gets 80% of its money from industry; and the CDC spends 4,900,000,000 of its 12,000,000,000 annual budget. Speaker 1 pushes back by noting that parents within these organizations vaccinate their own children against vaccines that include thimerosal, asking rhetorically whether they are willingly harming their children, and suggesting a broader government conspiracy. Speaker 0 then directs Speaker 1 to the movie Dopesick for further context, contrasting it with opioid prescriptions, and asserts that doctors treated patients and their own children with opioids because they believed FDA guidance. Overall, the dialogue centers on thimerosal in early vaccines, alleged hidden meetings and data suppression, controversial media coverage of vaccines-autism links, and critical claims about regulatory agency funding and conduct, culminating in comparisons to pharmaceutical and medical industry dynamics.

The speakers discuss the increased number of vaccines since 1990 and question if all are necessary. One speaker claims the US vaccine schedule includes twice as many shots as other Western countries. They suggest parents should educate themselves, space out or delay vaccines, and clean out toxins. One speaker believes public health officials may not always have people's best interests at heart. They claim the AAP and medical schools are financed by drug companies and that vaccines are the pharmaceutical industry's largest growing division, worth $13 billion. They suggest asking pharmaceutical companies to take a loss for the good of children is a tough sell.

Laura Logan hosts a discussion with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny on vaccines, public health policy, and what they see as failures and harms within the system. The conversation weaves together personal history, policy details, scientific debates, and broader social concerns, intercut with promotional content for GiveSendGo. Key points and claims raised by Dr. Tenpenny - Vaccine ingredients and aluminum exposure: Tenpenny asserts that if someone receives every vaccine on the schedule, they would be injected with a total of about twelve thousand micrograms of aluminum, which she says is inflammatory to every organ system and can be stored in bones (60% of aluminum exposure). She notes aluminum is present in vaccines in order to replace mercury, which she describes as also a poison. - Early vaccine industry liability and the 1986 Act: The discussion explains that prior to 1986 there were liability concerns for vaccine makers due to injury lawsuits. Tenpenny recounts that in 1986 Congress passed a law giving the pharmaceutical industry liability immunity for vaccines, creating what she describes as a ramp in the vaccine schedule. She cites that by 1991 additional vaccines were introduced (Hep B at birth, Hib, chickenpox, Prevnar, Gardasil, Hep A, and more) and alleges this resulted in a rising autism incidence aligned with new vaccines. - The vaccine injury system: Tenpenny explains the Injury Compensation Act and the existence of VAERS as a tracking system, along with a separate pathway created under the PREP Act (the Preparedness and Readiness Act). She states that during the COVID era a separate program, the Covered Countermeasure Program (CICP), existed under the PREP Act, but it had no funding and a one-year statute of limitations, leading to under-compensation and very few adjudicated cases; she contrasts this with the earlier 1986 act, which funded vaccine injury compensation through the Federal Court of Claims and VAERS. - Perceived safety and effectiveness concerns: The speakers discuss studies suggesting that the flu shot might not prevent flu and that some studies indicate vaccines including pneumonia vaccines may be associated with higher risk of the conditions they aim to prevent. Tenpenny frames this as evidence of cracks in the vaccine program and argues that vaccines are linked to a broad spectrum of health issues, including autoimmune diseases, infertility, and cancers, which she says have been increasing. - Pediatric vaccination schedule and “pediatric poisoning program”: Tenpenny asserts that infants receive multiple injections early in life, with claims that by age two they will have thousands of micrograms of aluminum and other compounds that remain in the body, including in the brain. She characterizes the pediatric schedule as a systematic poisoning program for children and a parallel “adult assault program” for adults receiving vaccines. - COVID-19 vaccine controversy and health impacts: The conversation covers the COVID vaccines, including assertions about adverse effects such as myocarditis, strokes, kidney injury, autoimmune diseases, neurological issues, and cancers. Tenpenny describes long-term concerns (long COVID, autoimmune diseases) and claims of widespread injury and death, contending that the pandemic revealed how the health-care and pharmaceutical systems operate, including alleged corruption and profit motives. She discusses the difficult experiences of families during the pandemic, including restrictions on care and the use of alternate treatments like ivermectin in some cases. - The claim that COVID vaccines were not properly evaluated and that mandated vaccination reflected coercion: The speakers discuss mandates and the experiences of individuals in workplaces and educational institutions who faced pressure to receive vaccines, including religious exemptions and disputes about mandates. Tenpenny suggests a broader pattern of overreach in public health policy and questions about the balance between individual rights and mandates. - History and philosophy of public health programs: They discuss the Healthy People initiatives, arguing that the program’s goals have expanded in scope (from 15 goals to 1,200 for Healthy People 2030) and that the expansion is associated with greater surveillance and control over personal lives. Tenpenny claims that this is part of a broader trend toward data collection and governance of individual health and behavior. - The economics and incentives around vaccines: The conversation notes how physicians are compensated in part through vaccine administration, implying financial incentives influence clinical decisions. Tenpenny emphasizes the profit motive behind vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry’s financial interests, citing extreme examples like the one boy in a photo who allegedly became heavily medicated due to vaccines. - The role of media and information control: They discuss the influence of advertising in media since the 1990s and the difficulty of reporting critically on vaccines when major advertisers are pharmaceutical companies. They also mention AI and misinformation concerns, including examples of AI fabricating sources and the need to verify information. - Personal stakes, accountability, and political possibilities: Tenpenny discusses personal cost for challenging the vaccine paradigm, including an earlier period of potential licensing scrutiny and professional pushback. She names figures such as Fauci and Birx, argues that accountability has not yet occurred, and expresses hope that public interest in accountability could shift through advocacy and political leadership, citing RFK Jr. as a potential ally though acknowledging political and institutional obstacles. - Treatment and detoxification approaches: For those who have already received vaccines, Tenpenny outlines two separate tracks: detoxification for childhood vaccines and detox for COVID vaccines. For detox, she mentions products such as PureBody Extra (PBX), a zeolite-based supplement she says helps remove metals like aluminum and mercury from the body. She notes it is usable across age groups and even for pets, and she personally uses it. She also discusses non-specific detox approaches such as vitamin D optimization, lymphatic stimulation, exercise, and a diet focusing on avoiding white foods and reducing inflammation. She cautions that there is no proven blood or urine test to quantify spike protein after a COVID vaccine, and that detox strategies aim to support overall health rather than remove embedded spike protein from tissues. - The role of faith and resilience: The interview includes discussions of faith as a guiding force for Tenpenny, including her personal journey toward Christian faith in 2020. They reflect on fear, hope, forgiveness, and the idea that one can act with integrity and do the right thing even when faced with controversy or personal cost. They discuss existential questions about meaning, purpose, and moral responsibility, including the belief that life has a spiritual dimension that informs how to respond to public-health challenges. - Community and parenting: The conversation emphasizes the importance of community networks for new parents, including seeking mentorship from experienced parents and trusted health advocates, and maintaining parental agency in decisions about vaccines, medical interventions, and child-rearing. They discuss the value of critical thinking, asking questions, and avoiding blind trust in professionals or institutions. - Closing notes and resources: Tenpenny provides her websites and a Substack for ongoing information, including dr10penny.com, dr10penny.substack.com, and 10pennywalkwithgod.substack.com, as well as her X profile busy doctor t. The episode closes with a call to viewers to stay informed and to seek second opinions, while thanking the audience for supporting independent journalism. Overall, the dialogue centers on a critical, conspiratorial framing of vaccines, public-health policy, and the medical establishment; it weaves together testimonies about personal experience, policy history (notably the 1986 Act and the PREP Act), alleged systemic failures in compensation for vaccine injuries, criticisms of COVID-19 responses and vaccine mandates, and practical detoxification and faith-based guidance. The promotional content for GiveSendGo lightly interrupts the core discussion, but the majority of the exchange remains an extended argument about vaccine safety, accountability, and the perceived influence of big pharma on health care and public policy.

The speakers discuss the vaccination landscape around human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, focusing on a controversial issue they claim has been known and disseminated since early on: contamination with DNA (DNA residuals) from Deinococcus or related genetic material in vaccines and the implications of aluminum adjuvants used in Gardasil/Gardasil 9. - They begin by asserting that HPV vaccines, including Gardasil/Sil, have been the subject of remarkable legal actions worldwide, including four major lawsuits in Japan. They note that historically, in Japan, many young women and girls stood as plaintiffs, and that the core problem they highlight is the DNA contamination issue (referred to as “ディー エ ヌ エー 混 入 汚 染 問 題”). - The claim is that from early on, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and others acknowledged this contamination as central. They reference a 2012 paper that reportedly made the DNA contamination problem very clear, naming pathogens such as Human Papillomavirus, HPV, and DEIN? They describe that vaccine particles (HBV? HPBL DNA fragments) were found to be directly bound to aluminum adjuvant particles in Gardasil, implying a mechanism by which residual DNA could be involved in adverse effects. - The speakers say that the 2012 study, and subsequent work, led to attention from doctors worldwide who listened to the voices of women and girls and wondered what was happening with the vaccine recipients. They claim that samples showed that residual HPV DNA fragments were consistently present and directly linked to aluminum adjuvant particles, and that “PCR” detection indicated the same DNA sequences across samples. They mention that the 2012 paper’s findings were followed by reporting that, by 2014, vaccination had been suspended in Japan earlier than many would have expected. - They recount a process in which major scientists from various countries (France, the UK, and others) were involved in investigating adenoviral or genetic components (they reference Shihan? and others) and that the Japan-based researchers, including Ishii Ken, were central figures. They describe meetings, PowerPoint presentations at a hotel, and a sequence of visits to the UK and the US (including HR-related planning with U.S. FDA and the UK authorities) that were interrupted by closures in the Obama era, leading to documentation and discussions about the safety concerns. - The speakers claim that by the 2012 report and again by 2014, all vaccine samples from multiple countries contained residual DNA, and that Japan became a hub for disseminating awareness of these issues globally. They state that the issue was present not only in the early Gardasil (Gardasil-4) but also in later forms, with references to Gardasil-9 and the idea that the DNA contamination and adjuvant interactions could contribute to immune and neurological symptoms in recipients, particularly in women and girls. - They discuss changes to WHO and FDA guidelines on residual DNA limits, noting a progression from 10 picograms to higher thresholds over time, implying corporate interests in allowing higher residual DNA quantities in vaccines. They emphasize that the shift in limits is tied to pharmaceutical companies’ needs, not human biology changes, and argue that Japan highlighted the problem of Deinance-DNA contamination during the cervical cancer vaccine era, signaling that researchers, journalists, and victims were aware long before others. - Finally, Speaker 1 adds that two points became clear a year earlier: the disruption of messenger RNA–type vaccines as a response to safety concerns, and the subsequent rise in adverse outcomes after widespread vaccination, including deaths, which they claim intensified opposition to these vaccines. Note: The summary presents the speakers' claims and sequencing of events as described in the transcript without evaluation or endorsement.

The aluminum safety study that allowed aluminum into US vaccines was based on a study of four New Zealand white rabbits, but the results from one rabbit were lost, leaving only three. The rabbits were killed after 28 days with no cognition tests. Upon sacrificing the rabbits, the aluminum adjuvants were still present in their bodies. 94% of one type of aluminum adjuvant and approximately 70% of another remained. The aluminum was found in the kidneys, liver, heart, lymph nodes, bone marrow, and brain. Despite the study's flaws and horrifying results, the FDA and CDC declared aluminum adjuvants in vaccines safe and effective. The speaker asserts that anyone who reads the study would not want to inject their children with aluminum adjuvanted vaccines.

The speaker questions the safety of Thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative in vaccines, asserting it hasn't been adequately tested since 1929 when Lilly tested it on 27 meningitis patients, all of whom died. Despite this, the speaker claims Thimerosal has been used since the 1930s. The speaker challenges the witness to definitively state that the amount of mercury injected into babies is harmless. The witness admits it's impossible to make such a categorical statement with 100% certainty. The speaker then asks if it's possible that even trace amounts of mercury could neurologically damage a child. The witness says they don't think it has that capacity, but concedes they don't have evidence for every child and dose. The speaker expresses frustration at the difficulty in addressing the issue.

According to the speaker, vaccines have never been tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate their safety. The speaker claims that vaccines contain aluminum compounds because many dead vaccines don't mount an immune response without them. The speaker alleges that in a Gardasil vaccine study, the placebo group received an aluminum adjuvant instead of a true placebo, so the side effect profiles of the active vaccine and placebo groups were the same. The speaker asserts that Merck used a novel aluminum compound and that data shows aluminum in vaccines is toxic. The speaker states that the only completely randomized controlled trial was on sheep using a vaccine for blue tongue disease. The speaker claims the aluminum was toxic, the sheep became sick, their behavior changed, and many died compared to the placebo group. The speaker concludes that the presumption that aluminum as an adjuvant is safe is unfounded and has never been tested.

The speaker criticizes the CDC's recommendation of giving newborns vaccines containing aluminum, which exceeds safe levels. They mention the lack of studies on the combined effects of the 28 vaccines given to babies. There has been no official study by the CDC, FDA, or NIH comparing the cumulative effects of these vaccines to unvaccinated children.

The speaker asked why the FDA and HHS removed thimerosal from most children's vaccines but left it in a few. They admitted not being vaccine experts and offered to investigate and provide more information later. The speaker expressed interest in sharing the answer with the public.

The speaker discusses efforts by Secretary Kennedy and others in the anti-vaxx movement to remove alum from vaccines. Alum, an aluminum salt, is used in about seven pediatric vaccines as an adjuvant to stimulate an immune response. The speaker believes that forcing manufacturers to reformulate vaccines would be a major issue because alum is a safe ingredient that has been used for seventy years, and there is no good alternative. Reformulation could cause many vaccines to come off the market because they would no longer be effective at stimulating the immune system. The speaker claims that other potential adjuvants are probably not as safe, and that reformulating vaccines would create a real dislocation in the market.

The speaker claims the DTP vaccine, once used in the US, caused brain injuries or death in 1 in 300 children, leading to its ban and the Vaccine Act. While the US and Europe don't use it, 161 million African children receive it annually. Bill Gates claimed the DTP vaccine saved 30 million lives, but the Danish government requested data, which he couldn't provide. Their independent 30-year study in Africa revealed that vaccinated girls died at 10 times the rate of unvaccinated girls from conditions like anemia, malaria, heart failure, and pneumonia. The speaker alleges the vaccine protected against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis but ruined the girls' immune systems, making them vulnerable to minor diseases.

Bill Gates and the WHO have promoted the DTP vaccine, but the US withdrew it in the 1980s due to brain damage in children, replacing it with the safer but less effective DTaP vaccine. While essentially banned for white children worldwide, Gates and the WHO gave it to African and Asian children. The Danish government, aware of this, requested a study proving the vaccine saved lives, but Gates couldn't provide one. The Danish government conducted a study in Africa using 30 years of vaccination records. The study, led by pro-vaccination scientists, found that girls who received the DTP vaccine were 10 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children, not from the targeted diseases, but from conditions like anemia, bilharzia, malaria, dysentery, and pneumonia. The speaker claims the vaccine was killing more people than the diseases it was intended to prevent. The speaker asserts this issue stems from a lack of placebo-controlled trials in vaccinology.

"What we're told is that the amount of aluminum in vaccines is completely safe. It's so miniscule. It would have no adverse effect on the human body." "Two hundred and fifty micrograms of aluminum are being injected into your day one old baby in that hepatitis b vaccine. Ten times the oral lethal dose in a rat study, and no one has ever checked it." "CBS reports United States Of America has the highest day one old birth rate in the world. In fact, we have more babies die in the first day of life than every other industrialized nation combined."