TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

So aluminum is the primary target, it appears, that is causing perhaps the most harm in these injections because it is a neurotoxin. Right? It's it's not good for any bodily system. And multiple studies now have linked it to asthma in children. They've linked it to sudden infant death syndrome, because when you inject an underdeveloped baby with not a functional detox system, you keep injecting neurotoxins that does indeed appears, induce brain stem failure and thus, apnea in sleep. We have that. Then we do have three studies that link aluminum to autism or autism rates. So, yeah, this ingredient should be removed from childhood vaccines. It has no place in there. We don't need neurotoxins in these injections.

Speaker 0 suggests giving a child who hasn't received any immunizations before six different injections at once. Speaker 1 confirms that a six-month-old would receive DTaP, polio, and Hep B vaccines. They discuss the use of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines to make them more effective. Speaker 1 asks about the form of aluminum used in vaccines, and Speaker 0 mentions that ingested aluminum is different from injected aluminum. They discuss the safety of injected aluminum and its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Speaker 1 asks about antigens bound to aluminum and their role in creating antibodies. They also mention the presence of animal and human parts in vaccines. Speaker 0 is unsure about the specific details. They discuss the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccine production and the presence of cellular debris in vaccines. Speaker 0 relies on CDC and American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations for vaccine safety. They consider family history factors, such as immune suppression, when determining vaccine recommendations. They clarify the type of polio vaccine used in the United States.

The speaker believes all vaccines are suspect. As an emergency medicine physician, the speaker thought vaccines only contained a dead or attenuated virus and saline. In September 2000, after reading a package insert and researching vaccines, the speaker was mortified to learn that a child receiving all scheduled vaccines gets almost 13,000 micrograms of aluminum, almost 600 micrograms of mercury, and over 200 chemicals. The speaker states that this is why vaccines have never been proven safe, and vaccination is like injecting foreign matter into a baby.

The speaker questions the safety of 5,000 micrograms for children under six. They claim many vaccine trials use an aluminum adjuvant containing placebo or other aluminum-containing vaccines as the control group. The speaker argues that because the control group receives aluminum, the study is invalidated. They further claim that countries with less aggressive vaccine schedules do not have significant trends in autistic diagnoses. They state that the Amish community, which is largely unvaccinated, has extremely low rates of autism diagnoses.

The speaker expresses concern about vaccine adjuvants, particularly aluminum, and their potential link to allergies. They highlight the paradox of using inflammation-inducing substances to make vaccines work in a nonspecific way, especially when inflammation is generally considered harmful. The speaker argues that injecting aluminum to hyperactivate the immune system should necessitate specific instructions to minimize the risk of triggering reactions to non-pathogens, potentially leading to lifelong reactivity. They claim to have never heard such instructions being provided.

Speaker 0 argues that the myth that vaccines are safe and necessary and that they eradicated childhood disease is false. He claims vaccines have never been tested for safety and that there are no placebo-controlled trials; in trials, the control group is given the immunogens that are in the vaccine, making the comparison deceptive. He emphasizes that vaccines typically contain a protein plus an accompanying substance—the adjuvant or immunogen—that stimulates an immune response, and that these adjuvants (such as aluminum or other substances) by themselves are dangerous. When the control group receives these adjuvants along with the experimental group, he says the side effects are similar, describing this as a “slight hand trick” and “extremely deceptive.” He notes that for the last forty years people have been shouting that there has not been a true placebo-controlled trial with saline. He then argues that if one looks at the history of all the childhood illnesses that vaccines target, they were almost all nearly eradicated before the introduction of the vaccine. He claims that the impression vaccines stop childhood illnesses is not true; almost all illnesses had reduced to extremely low levels due to sanitation and hygiene, development, and some antibiotics. Regarding the vaccines themselves, he states that the true data and history of these vaccines are “really horrible.” He mentions a history of lack of safety and relates it to sudden infant death syndrome, asserting that it “suddenly came out of nowhere as we suspended the schedule” and asks when death occurs. He asserts that sudden infant death syndrome is reproducible in that it occurs at two months, four months, and six months, and that most of those deaths occur within days to a couple of weeks of the vaccine. He concludes with a strong personal stance: if he had his young children today, he would not give them a single vaccine.

We've already taken out and are in the process of taking out mercury and aluminum now. You know what mercury is? You know what aluminum is? Who the hell wants that pumped into a body? And there were rumors about both of them for a long time, but, we're having them taken out. We're having them taken out of the vaccines.

The speaker believes current vaccines and mRNA-based vaccine designs cannot be safe enough. They compare vaccines to television or social media, stating that the business model and methods used to obscure safety signals invalidate the products. Upon learning that vaccines use adjuvants to hyperactivate the immune system, the speaker questioned its safety and connection to allergies. They highlight that vaccines are designed to cause inflammation to work. Using aluminum as an example, the speaker argues that injecting aluminum to hyperactivate the immune system should require detailed instructions to minimize the risk of triggering the immune system to react to non-pathogens, which could cause lasting reactivity. They state they have never heard of such instructions.

According to the speaker, most vaccines have never been tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate their safety. The speaker claims that vaccines contain aluminum compounds because many dead vaccines don't mount an immune response without them. The speaker alleges that in a Gardasil vaccine study, the placebo group received an aluminum adjuvant instead of a true placebo, resulting in similar side effect profiles between the active vaccine and placebo groups. The speaker asserts that Merck used a novel aluminum compound and that data suggests aluminum in vaccines is profoundly toxic. The speaker states that the only true randomized controlled trial involving a vaccine was conducted on sheep with blue tongue disease. The results allegedly showed that the aluminum in the vaccine was toxic, causing the sheep to become sick, unsociable, and, in some cases, die. The speaker concludes that the assumption that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines are safe is unfounded and has never been tested.

Speaker 0 suggests that a child who hasn't received any immunizations will have to endure six injections at once. Speaker 1 confirms that a six-month-old would receive DTaP, polio, and Hep B vaccines. Speaker 0 mentions that the type of Hep B vaccine depends on previous sessions. The same applies to a two-and-a-half-year-old. Speaker 1 questions why aluminum adjuvants are used in vaccines, to which Speaker 0 replies that they make the vaccine more effective. Speaker 1 asks about the form of aluminum and its effects, but Speaker 0 is unsure. They discuss the quantity of ingested and injected aluminum, but Speaker 0 believes the amount in vaccines is safe. Speaker 1 questions the ability of aluminum to cross the blood-brain barrier, but Speaker 0 is unaware. They also discuss antigens, macrophages, and vaccine ingredients, but Speaker 0 lacks specific knowledge. The conversation ends with Speaker 1 asking about family history factors and the type of polio vaccine used in the US. Speaker 0 provides some clarification.

Vaccine makers convened at a WHO symposium, but the speaker is not shocked. The speaker anticipates discussion, but not action to remove aluminum. Aluminum adjuvants are the only quick and cheap option for producing hundreds of millions of vaccine doses. Therefore, vaccine makers will not eliminate it. The speaker believes the decision made was to shut down Chris Exley.

That there is a movement among our secretary, Kennedy, and others in the anti vax movement to take alum out of vaccines. It's used in about seven different pediatric vaccines, including one by Pfizer as an adjuvant, so it helps stimulate an immune response. So they want to force manufacturers, I believe, to reformulate those vaccines. That would be a major issue because this is a very safe ingredient, it's been used for seventy years, there's really no alternative. If they force manufacturers to have to reformulate all those pediatric vaccines, I think you'd see a lot of vaccines potentially come off the market because there is no good alternative. Meaning that they would no longer be effective, they wouldn't stimulate the immune?

Speaker 0 states his position on vaccines has changed because he learned how they are produced. He had assumed they were produced reasonably, but discovered safety work had not been done. He says that in a book he completed in 2019, he listed vaccination as one of medicine's three great achievements, along with surgery and antibiotics. He now believes the mechanisms used by vaccine manufacturers and the methods used to obscure safety signals invalidate the products. Discovering that vaccines use a trick to hyper-activate the immune system to work, he questioned its safety and its connection to allergies. Speaker 0 says injecting aluminum to hyper-activate the immune system should come with instructions about what to avoid eating or seasons to avoid the shot, to minimize the likelihood of triggering the immune system to react to something that is not a pathogen. Speaker 1 summarizes this by saying the vaccine opens up the body so that anything present at the time can trigger an immune response.

A study out of Denmark claims aluminum in vaccines is safe, but the speaker argues the methodology is flawed. The study excluded children who died before age two, or had pre-existing conditions like congenital rubella syndrome, respiratory conditions, primary immune deficiency, or heart or liver failure. The study compared children who received slightly different amounts of aluminum, lacking a true placebo group of unvaccinated children. The study also excluded children who received what they deemed an "implausible" number of vaccines. According to the speaker, this number is exceeded by the standard US vaccine schedule by age two for DTaP, Haemophilus influenza, and pneumococcal vaccines. The speaker concludes the study's findings are not applicable to children in the United States and anticipates a rebuttal from scientists who study aluminum's neurotoxicity.

The speaker is frustrated because they received an important video that they can't share due to it being blocked on various platforms. They then introduce another speaker who discusses the concerns about aluminum nanoparticles in vaccines. The speaker explains that these nanoparticles can enter the brain and potentially cause neurodevelopmental disabilities, including Alzheimer's. They argue that the safety of aluminum nanoparticles in vaccines has not been properly evaluated and that vaccine ingredients can enter the brain. The speaker also mentions the link between vaccines and chronic inflammation, as well as the rise in neurodevelopmental disabilities, autoimmune diseases, and seizures. They conclude by stating that vaccines have not been effectively studied and are not as safe as claimed.

Speaker 0 shows a metal container described as a “thimerosal bomb,” noting they keep it because they are a little afraid of it, and it is a very fine powder. Speaker 2 states that thimerosal is labeled very toxic and has cumulative effects, capable of causing damage to the kidneys, respiratory system, skin, and nervous system. It specifically warns of reproductive and developmental toxicity, meaning it can cause things like autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. They emphasize that this is immensely toxic stuff. Speaker 0 notes that thimerosal is present in a vaccine. Speaker 2 explains that thimerosal is used in a whole range of products, with vaccines being a major example because it is directly injected. They reference the tetanus vaccine, noting a vial that expires and contains thimerosal as a preservative. They claim that thimerosal has been a big exposure issue in the United States, especially with the influenza vaccine, which is now recommended for all pregnant women, all infants, and all children on a yearly basis. Speaker 1 adds a point about how thimerosal is added: it is not something added at the end after production but is incorporated because the factory is not clean and not sterile. They argue that either there must be an expensive sterile factory that does not need thimerosal or one that produces thimerosal, and that thimerosal would need to be used throughout production. They assert that the use of thimerosal needs to be stopped. Speaker 2 identifies the influenza vaccine from Adventist Pasture, “their flu zone,” and states that it contains twenty-five micrograms of mercury per dose. Speaker 1 discusses personal experience, noting that many people did not know about thimerosal. They reveal they have given 2,000 RhoGAM shots and have been in vaccines for thirty-five years, and they did not know that RhoGAM contained thimerosal. They suggest that many doctors were unaware that the term “thimerosal” referred to mercury.

Here's something that people should know, is that aluminum provokes an allergic response, and that's why it's valuable. So if you put the aluminum in with the viral antigen, your body now mounts an allergic response to that viral antigen, whether it's polio or hepatitis B or the, you know, HPV or whatever. the alumina also creates allergic responses to anything that's in the ambient environment. So if you have a peanut oil excipient in that vaccine, you and you put aluminum in it, now you could have a lifetime allergy to peanuts. And, you know, there’s two studies by Mawson and Cowlings, which show that children who are vaccinated with aluminum vaccines have thirty times the rate of allergic rhinitis as kids who don't.

Vaccines are considered a pillar of medicine and are rarely questioned, but everything in science should be questioned. Research is being conducted on aluminum, a common vaccine adjuvant, and its impact on the nervous system. Injectable aluminum, unlike dietary aluminum, is designed to remain in the body. An experiment was conducted involving injecting aluminum hydroxide into mice to mimic vaccine schedules. The mice rapidly developed behavioral symptoms, motor function issues, and cognitive deficits. Upon examination, massive damage to motor neurons was discovered. This raises concerns about potentially creating conditions for diseases like Parkinson's, Lou Gehrig's, and Alzheimer's later in life. Despite concerns about backlash when the study was released, the response was largely silence from pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies. No counter-studies have been presented to refute the findings.

So aluminum is the primary target, it appears, that is causing perhaps the most harm in these injections because it is a neurotoxin. And multiple studies now have linked it to asthma in children. They've linked it to sudden infant death syndrome, because when you inject an underdeveloped baby with not a functional detox system, you keep injecting neurotoxins that does indeed appears, induce brain stem failure and thus, apnea in sleep. They can't breathe and then they die. Then we do have three studies that link aluminum to autism or autism rates. So, yeah, this ingredient should be removed from childhood vaccines. It has no place in there. We don't need neurotoxins in these injections.

So aluminum is the primary target, it appears, that is causing perhaps the most harm in these injections because it is a neurotoxin. Right? It's it's not good for any bodily system. And multiple studies now have linked it to asthma in children. They've linked it to sudden infant death syndrome, because when you inject an underdeveloped baby with not a functional detox system, you keep injecting neurotoxins that does indeed appears, induce brain stem failure and thus, apnea in sleep. They can't breathe and then they die. We have that. Then we do have three studies that link aluminum to autism or autism rates. So, yeah, this ingredient should be removed from childhood vaccines. It has no place in there. We don't need neurotoxins in these injections.

Big problem with trusting the science is not the science part, it's who's behind the science part, primarily in the area of vaccines for children. Normally, when you study a drug, you compare it with a placebo, so that way you can truly test the side effects on something, but that is not how they test children's vaccines. This so called placebo control is not really a true placebo control because it's not inert. It's an active vaccine with something called an adjuvant. The big one that they've been using for a long time is aluminum. My question is, how can you really truly test the safety and effectiveness of something if you're looking at the relative safety of an active vaccine to another active vaccine with adjuvants. That just muddies the water to this whole safe and effective claim that you keep hearing over and over and over.

A speaker played a recording of a conversation where another person recalled a discussion about removing aluminum from vaccines. According to the speaker, vaccine companies were once very close to removing aluminum. The speaker claims that all the big vaccine companies were at the same table because they had the same interest to defend. The speaker suggests that banning aluminum would deeply trouble vaccine companies, completely changing manufacturing, clinical studies, and everything else. The speaker recalls that the companies argued that removing aluminum would cause a tremendous deficiency in vaccine supply, leading to the deaths of children in Africa. The speaker states that the WHO was also very much involved.

According to the speaker, vaccines have never been tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate their safety. The speaker claims that vaccines contain aluminum compounds because many dead vaccines don't mount an immune response without them. The speaker alleges that in a Gardasil vaccine study, the placebo group received an aluminum adjuvant instead of a true placebo, so the side effect profiles of the active vaccine and placebo groups were the same. The speaker asserts that Merck used a novel aluminum compound and that data shows aluminum in vaccines is toxic. The speaker states that the only completely randomized controlled trial was on sheep using a vaccine for blue tongue disease. The speaker claims the aluminum was toxic, the sheep became sick, their behavior changed, and many died compared to the placebo group. The speaker concludes that the presumption that aluminum as an adjuvant is safe is unfounded and has never been tested.

Here's something that people should know, is that aluminum provokes an allergic response, and that's why it's valuable. So if you put the aluminum in with the viral antigen, your body now mounts an allergic response to that viral antigen, whether it's polio or hepatitis B or the, you know, HPV or whatever. So if you have a peanut oil excipient in that vaccine, you and you put aluminum in it, now you could have a lifetime allergy to peanuts. They take the aluminum adjuvant from the hepatitis B vaccine, add a latex molecule, and that rat now has a permanent latex allergy. You add a peanut molecule and it has a permanent peanut allergy.

The speaker criticizes the CDC's recommendation of giving newborns vaccines containing aluminum, which exceeds safe levels. They mention the lack of studies on the combined effects of the 28 vaccines given to babies. There has been no official study by the CDC, FDA, or NIH comparing the cumulative effects of these vaccines to unvaccinated children.