reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The video argues that China has a unique, long-standing supply chain that involves state security, public security, hospitals, biotech companies, airlines, high-speed rail, and schools. This is described as a “hundred fifty year industry” that could cost lives if spoken about aloud, referencing the death of a actor as an example. The speaker explains that this concept derives from a moment when Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin discussed how humans could live to 150 years old while on the way to a military parade; the speaker asserts that Xi was expressing confidence in China’s medical system and the related supply chain. According to the speaker, a dark medical supply chain exists in which young people have become sources of spare body parts for the rich and powerful, with schools, hospitals, police, and local governments all implicated. Public discussion of this topic has surged as more people go missing. The age range of affected individuals is said to be expanding from toddlers to teenagers to young adults and now middle-aged men and women, including people in their fifties. The speaker notes that a Shanghai official told friends that people should not go to hospitals for physical exams if they are under 60, arguing that as demand for body parts rises, a 50-year-old who “still looks good” is valuable, while the biggest group affected remains children. As 2026 began, reports of missing children across China reportedly increased. The speaker cites a sequence of disappearances in Henan: a mysterious death of a 13-year-old boy, followed within a week by another boy’s disappearance in a township near Xincai County on January 9; a 14-year-old boy, Yang Jiahao, missing on January 11 in Shangji Township; a 13-year-old boy, Wang Yichun, missing January 12 in Heilong Township; and a 14-year-old girl, Xu Mengyao, missing January 12 in Dancheng County, Henan. Concurrently, helicopters were reported in busy urban areas transporting what many suspect to be organs or organ-harvesting victims. Around 2 PM on January 15, a helicopter was filmed lifting a white bag from the rooftop of a traditional Chinese medicine hospital in Xiamen, Fujian. Netizens noted the bag appeared to be moving, leading to heightened online scrutiny, while authorities began censoring the footage.

The speakers discuss financial incentives for abortion services and procedures. They mention removing body parts intact for organ harvesting. The conversation includes details on dismembering fetuses and ensuring intact organs for research purposes. The speakers also discuss the process of extracting body parts during abortions.

The clients of these underground operations are extremely wealthy, arriving in private jets and helicopters. They pay a hefty sum to spend time with a child, knowing that the child will not survive. If the child becomes disabled, no one will care for them, so they are immediately turned into organ donors. These operations are highly secretive and well-organized, resembling corporations. There is a medical team on standby, responsible for organizing the transplants and finding clients for the organs. The demand for organs is immense, ensuring that these operations continue.

A network in Ukraine was arrested for selling human organs, mainly kidneys, to Israelis for up to $10,000 each, then reselling them for over $200,000. Most donors were young, impoverished women. This is not the first time Israelis have been linked to organ trafficking, with previous reports alleging Israeli soldiers killed young Palestinians for their organs.

In the UK, there are 24 million registered organ donors, but waiting times for organs like lungs can exceed two years, leading some to lose hope. In the US, liver transplants may take up to five years. In contrast, in China, emergency organ transplants can occur in as little as four hours. This rapid availability raises concerns, particularly regarding the Uyghur population in Xinjiang, where individuals were reportedly forced to give blood in 2016 under the guise of health checks. There are suspicions that this blood collection is part of a system to create an organ database. When someone needs an organ, their sample is matched with a person in Xinjiang, who may then go missing, resulting in the organ being provided to the requester.

This lady went for a mommy makeover in to another country and actually got her organs harvested. She didn't return home. Kadale, a 37 year old from London, thought she was getting a discounted full body makeover in Turkey—Tummy tuck, breast lift, Brazilian butt lift—bundled with free airfare and hotel stay. She took her sister for support; her sister waited outside the Operating Room for hours, as they reassured that she'll be out soon, but she had actually passed away. They handed her sister a refunded surgery fee and a plane ticket home. Autopsy in London revealed brain was gone and portions of her lung, heart, and intestines were missing; organs harvested. Doctor denies even knowing her, ever working on her. It's crazy.

Animal rights activists have more influence on vaccine companies than anti-abortion activists. There is concern over the lack of outcry regarding human babies born alive at 5 to 6 months old for research purposes. These babies are delivered alive and their hearts are cut out without anesthesia. The speaker clarifies that they are referring to fetuses that are 5 months old. Stanley Plotkin, a scientist, described using various parts of aborted fetuses for vaccine production. Scientists purchase different body parts for research purposes. The speaker mentions receiving a catalog with prices for body parts of 32-week-old babies. The conversation then shifts to discussing the science behind this issue.

Animal rights activists have more influence than vaccine companies and anti-abortion activists. There is concern over the lack of outcry regarding human babies born alive at 5 to 6 months old for research purposes. These babies are delivered alive and their hearts are cut out without anesthesia. The speaker emphasizes that they wouldn't do this to a mouse. The conversation then shifts to discussing the use of fetuses in vaccine production. Stanley Plotkin, a scientist, allegedly used various parts of aborted fetuses for vaccines. The speaker confirms that scientists purchase different body parts for research purposes. The speaker mentions receiving a catalog with prices for body parts from 20 years ago. The conversation concludes by acknowledging the moral implications and transitioning to discussing the science.

The transcript depicts an undercover-style interview with individuals involved in a global child trafficking and organ harvesting operation. The speakers discuss how the network operates, the profits, and the brutal methods used to procure children and organs, often exploiting vulnerable mothers. Key points: - Donor kit and adoption timing: The trafficker (Speaker 1) explains the cost structure and process, saying he “gets €15,000 for abroad with a kid” and that delivering a child takes about two weeks if there are no special requests for gender. The plan requires several meetings, a party, and testing of the girl, with multiple people involved to ensure the girl’s compliance. - Recruitment and manipulation: The group uses persuasion and “positive thinking” techniques, aiming to see the girl’s reaction and exploiting mothers who are vulnerable or indebted. If a girl has a child, she is pressured or reassured before being persuaded to hand the child over. - Transfer options and appetite for either a child or organs: Depending on demand, the organization may pull a child from a brothel to satisfy clients seeking a child or spare parts. They advertise themselves as a sponsor or businessman abroad, receiving many replies from girls who think they are applying for companionship or work. - Targeted profiles and grooming: An “ideal” girl is described as selfish and easily pliable, with tactics including bribing experiences (a trip to Mazari), monitoring reactions to a child’s calls, and testing loyalty in ways that reveal vulnerability to manipulation. - After acquisition: If a girl agrees, discussions cover the child’s fate, with the implication that the child may be taken away and replaced with forged documents later. There is mention of marriages to Arab men and Muslim legal processes to adopt the child and move it abroad, often with easy, illegitimate name changes that erase traces. - Documentation and traceability: The process often involves swapping papers or creating new identities for the child in Poland or abroad, so that traceability is lost. This includes using new papers for Ukrainian-made children, or other methods to render the child effectively invisible to authorities. - Kidnapping and urgent transplants: Kidnapping is described as rare but possible in emergencies when a transplant is urgently needed. The organization uses coordinated efforts to manage the client’s access while avoiding exposure. - Violent and dehumanizing practices: The dialogue describes infants being tortured and dismembered for organs in a sterile room at a villa, with phrases indicating that infants “suffer” and are used as “spare parts.” Older children are drugged and exploited over time; infants are deemed “useless” for long-term exploitation. - Global network and sophistication: The brokers, medical teams, and logistics are likened to a corporation, with branches worldwide, high-security operations, and organized procurement of both children and organs. The demand is described as immense and ongoing. - Emotional detachment: One speaker notes the mother’s collapse into depression and a desire to kill herself and the baby; another reflects a chilling detachment about the mother’s suffering and the ultimate objective of profit. The dialogue reveals a highly organized, international criminal market for exploiting women and children, with both adoption fraud and organ trafficking tightly interwoven, including identity manipulation, forced payments, and extreme violence.

Big money is being made from the sale of fetal body parts, which even disturbs pro-choice advocates. The medical director for the national office discusses the demand for specific body parts, such as livers and lower extremities, and the pricing range for these specimens. Techniques are discussed to ensure intact organs are obtained, and the importance of communication between the person performing the procedures and the end goal is emphasized. The possibility of partnering with EPFA to streamline the process is mentioned, although it is currently deemed too sensitive. The conversation concludes with gratitude for the helpfulness of a certain individual in fetal tissue collection.

Plants have designated requesters, usually friendly and well-dressed, who befriend the relatives and offer support. This is part of the indoctrination process to procure organs. Organs for transplant can only come from living individuals, not cadavers. The target donors are children and young adults between 15 and 30 years old. The speaker reveals a disturbing practice where overdose victims are given Narcan to bring them to the emergency room, but their lives are not saved. Instead, their organs are harvested. Brain death is determined by lack of consciousness, absence of brain stem reflexes, and a procedure called the apnea test. The speaker warns against doing this test and shares a personal story of a girl who was declared dead but is still alive. Dissecting organs from living individuals is the only way to obtain them; cadavers cannot be used.

The system is run through China, Israel, Ukraine, and the US now. It’s like harvesting organs and discarding the rest; a soylent green analogy. There are videos in Ukraine about 'Chorny Transplantologia'—the black transplantologist—and they're underground harvesting areas. A wounded Ukrainian soldier: not dead yet; two kidneys, two lungs, a heart, a liver; rest goes to food supply. This part I can't prove, but I can prove about the kidneys. The person is worth almost a million; you selling it could fetch over a million. If you sell your own kidney, you might get 10x markup. It involves big hospitals in China and live harvesting of Uighurs, Christians, Falun Gong.

The speaker discusses the desperate need for a kidney transplant and the risks associated with finding a suitable donor. They express concern about putting organ donor information on a driver's license, as it may make individuals targets for organ harvesting. The speaker mentions cases where organs have been stolen from deceased individuals, including instances involving celebrities and African Americans. They highlight the potential misuse of DNA records by law enforcement and express frustration over the lack of accountability in cases of organ harvesting. The speaker concludes by emphasizing that organ harvesting is a global issue that needs more attention.

The clients of this organization are wealthy individuals who arrive in private jets and helicopters. They pay a large sum to spend time with a child, knowing that the child will not survive or may become disabled. In such cases, the child's organs are immediately harvested. This organization has branches worldwide, with highly secure operating rooms. It operates like a complex corporation, with a medical team on standby and individuals responsible for finding organs for clients. The demand for organs is high, and the organization continues to meet this demand.

Organs cannot be taken from cadavers because brain cells die within minutes of oxygen deprivation. A person is not dead if their heart is beating, they are metabolizing fluids, or having bowel movements. Brain death is a lie manufactured for eugenics, to facilitate organ harvesting. The best organ donors are 30 years old, with a beating heart, circulation, and on a ventilator. The decision to take organs is made early, as treatment to preserve organs differs from life-saving treatment. In the UK, everyone is an organ donor unless they opt out. When a 999 call is made, the system assesses the caller's medical history, tax contributions, and worth to determine if they receive life-saving treatment or are considered an organ donor. This system is eugenics.

The speaker describes a system of organ harvesting that they claim now runs through China, Israel, Ukraine, and the United States, noting that it wasn’t as prominent in the past. They assert that organs are harvested and the rest is disposed of, comparing it to a form of Soylent Green. They reference videos from Ukraine about a group called the Chorny Transplantologia, described as the black transplantologist. The speaker claims Putin is aware of this, and that the Russian army has underground harvesting areas. They describe a scenario where a young Ukrainian soldier who is not likely to survive is essentially cut for organ procurement—two kidneys, two lungs, a heart, a liver, and the rest allegedly goes into the food supply. The speaker says they cannot prove the food-supply part but can prove the kidney and other organ harvesting claims. The speaker asserts that the subject’s value is nearly a million dollars once sold, and that the price increases significantly. They claim that if someone sells their own kidney on the black market, they receive only a small amount while the mark-up is about tenfold by the time it reaches large hospitals in China, which allegedly exist for this purpose. Finally, the speaker claims that live harvesting occurs in China targeting Uighurs, Christians, and Falun Gong.

We interviewed someone involved in arms trafficking whose family is heavily involved in organ harvesting in Mexico. They explained that when they receive an order, they find a victim of similar demographics, often using children to lure the target away. The organs are extracted by a Mexican surgeon in veterinary clinics in rural Quanta Roo, Mexico. The remains are discarded in barrels filled with used car oil and fuel to disintegrate them. This individual, only 25, has witnessed too many victims. Our research indicates organ trafficking is occurring in Mexico, Central America, and South America. While we haven't found any cases in the United States, the buyers are commonly US citizens. Important changes are coming to this show. Sign up for my email list at briannamorello.substack.com for exclusive content. It's free, but you can become a paid subscriber to support my work as an independent journalist.

Animal rights activists have more influence on vaccine companies than anti-abortion activists. The lack of outcry over live-born human babies, aged 5 to 6 months, being used for research is concerning. These babies are delivered alive and have their hearts cut out without anesthesia. Some scientists purchase different body parts for research purposes. The speaker recalls seeing a catalog with prices for body parts of 32-week-old babies. The moral implications are revolting, but the focus will now shift to the scientific aspects.

There is no such thing as brain death; if your heart is beating, you are not dead. This concept was manufactured to facilitate eugenics through organ harvesting. Organs cannot be taken from cadavers because brain cells are damaged within minutes of oxygen deprivation. The best organ donors are under 30, with a beating heart, circulation, and on a ventilator. The decision to take organs is made early, possibly before the patient is aware, because organ preservation treatment differs from life-saving treatment. In the UK, everyone is an organ donor unless they opt out. When a 999 call is made, the system accesses medical history, tax records, and other data to determine if the person receives life-saving treatment or is considered an organ donor based on age and other factors. This is eugenics.

Big money is being made from the sale of fetal body parts. Even pro-choice advocates are disturbed. People want liver and lower extremities. The price is $30 to $100 per specimen. Providers try to change the presentation so it's not vertex. If starting from a breech presentation, dilation happens as the case goes out. There are steps to change the COVID presentation. If enough dilation is maintained, the person doing the procedures understands what is needed. Knowing what is needed makes a huge difference. One person had 8 cases and knew which were more likely to yield what was needed, making decisions accordingly. Conversations are happening behind closed doors with affiliates.

Brain death was invented without patient data or basic science studies, and brainwave testing is not required, despite some patients in initial studies having brainwave activity. Organ harvesting is performed on living individuals who may be conscious but unable to communicate. Paralyzing agents are used during organ removal, though patients may still exhibit pain responses like increased heart rate and blood pressure. Brain death was created to procure organs and reduce costs associated with long-term care. Designated requesters, often clergy or pastoral care, befriend relatives to facilitate organ donation. Organs for transplant must be healthy and can only be obtained from living persons, not cadavers. The speaker claims that the information is suppressed because it is upsetting. Organ procurement targets children and individuals aged 16-30. More organs are now obtained from drug overdoses than from accidents and gunshot wounds. Narcan is administered to overdose victims to get them to the emergency room for organ harvesting.

China claimed to have stopped harvesting prisoners' organs in 2015, but a tribunal in 2019 found evidence suggesting otherwise. Chinese surgeon Dr. Enver Tothi, a whistleblower, recounted an incident where he was asked to remove organs from a living prisoner at an execution ground. Despite the panic among the medical team, they proceeded with the procedure. The chief surgeon instructed Dr. Tothi to quickly remove the liver and kidneys. This testimony raises concerns about the ongoing supply of organs in Chinese hospitals and suggests a connection to executions.

The speakers discuss the use of aborted fetuses in medical research. Speaker 1 confirms that various organs, including the lung, skin, kidney, spleen, and heart, were included in a study. Speaker 0 questions the number of fetuses Speaker 1 has worked with throughout their career, to which Speaker 1 admits not remembering the exact number but acknowledges studying quite a few before using them for vaccine production. When asked about the number of studies involving fetuses, Speaker 1 cannot recall. Speaker 0 then mentions that one objection to vaccination is the use of aborted fetuses.

We perform dissections to obtain tissues requested by researchers. I'm not in the room when the fetus is eliminated from the mother, and I'm not qualified to testify about its medical or biological condition at that time. When I say the tissues are "not alive," I mean they are not moving. Whether or not they have a heartbeat depends. I have seen hearts, not within an intact POC, that are beating independently.

The video discusses the controversial topic of organ trafficking. It highlights the involvement of an Israeli doctor in a trafficking ring and the ethical concerns surrounding the sale of organs. The debate revolves around the idea that while markets can be beneficial, there are certain things, like organs, that should not be for sale. The video also explores the motivations behind organ trafficking, including the scarcity of organs and the potential for profit. It raises questions about whether individuals would still pursue a kidney transplant knowing the criminal networks and brokers involved. The video concludes by mentioning a newspaper report that sparked controversy by suggesting Israel may have harvested organs from Palestinian families. The investigation will take the viewers on a journey across the United States and Israel to seek answers.