reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speakers discuss the legitimacy of various elections, including the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections. They express concerns about Russian interference, voter suppression, and irregularities with electronic voting machines. Some speakers believe that the election outcomes were affected and that the presidents were illegitimate. They mention specific cases like Bush vs. Gore in 2000 and the 2004 Ohio election. Stacey Abrams' loss in Georgia is also mentioned, with some speakers claiming that her election was stolen. Overall, the speakers question the fairness and integrity of these elections.

The speaker emphasizes the need to investigate the legitimacy of the election and understand what happened. They express a willingness to work with anyone, regardless of party, to uncover the truth and make improvements. They mention the importance of knowing what laws need to be changed but acknowledge the lack of knowledge about the situation. The speaker concludes by thanking the chairman and Senator Heath.

The speaker discusses the victor of an unknown event and expresses uncertainty about who it is. They mention looking at the facts and suggest that the victor may have been "slaughtered." They also claim that the election was corrupt.

The speaker talks about someone named Patty who they believe is involved in corrupt activities. They mention hearing rumors about Patty having a baby and owning a luxurious house and condo. The speaker also mentions that Patty doesn't care about any scams as long as she benefits from them. Overall, the speaker questions whether Patty is a vote rigger and emphasizes that Patty only makes their lead figures bigger.

There is a discussion about the extent of election fraud, with one person believing it exists based on recent events in Arizona. Another person emphasizes that elections belong to the people and citizens should have transparency in the voting process. The first person expresses distrust in mainstream media. Both agree that something feels amiss, although the specifics are unclear.

The speaker expresses disbelief that an election could be won by a single vote. They highlight the absurdity of the situation, noting the initial vote count was 44-35 in favor of the liberal party. The speaker finds it bizarre that the election result hinges on one vote. They then mention a woman named Emmanuel, who claims Elections Canada didn't count her vote due to an incorrect address. The speaker questions how, out of all the people in Turbine, Emmanuel, who allegedly voted for the block, was the only one whose vote couldn't be found.

The speakers discuss allegations of election interference and illegitimacy in past elections, particularly focusing on the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. They mention Russian interference, voter suppression, and issues with electronic voting machines. The overall sentiment is that elections have been stolen, leading to concerns about the integrity of the democratic process. The speakers express doubts about the legitimacy of certain election results, such as in Georgia and Ohio, and emphasize the need for fair and transparent elections.

The speakers discuss the speaker's potential candidacy and the pressure they are facing from powerful individuals who want to keep them out of the race. The speaker expresses frustration with being controlled and owned by others and their refusal to work with people who don't align with their agenda. They also mention the possibility of election theft and their determination to fight against it. The speaker declares their intention to run and be a thorn in the side of those who oppose them, even if it means facing extreme consequences.

The speaker discusses the risks surrounding the upcoming election. They highlight Donald Trump's refusal to commit to a peaceful transfer of power and his fear mongering about mail-in ballots. The speaker mentions that the election results may not be finalized on November 3rd, leading to potential disagreements and court cases. They emphasize the importance of taking Trump's statements seriously, particularly his comments about getting rid of ballots and questioning their manipulation. The speaker concludes by mentioning the significance of believing authoritarian figures when they make statements.

The speaker questions the legitimacy of the presidential election results, emphasizing that being declared president by news outlets does not make it official. They suggest investigating all concerns raised. Fox News is mentioned. Another person agrees and points out the importance of looking into the matter.

The speaker discusses the victor of an unknown event and expresses uncertainty about who it is. They mention looking at the facts and suggest that the person may have been "slaughtered." They also claim that the election was corrupt.

The speakers discuss the legitimacy of the 2016 election and claim it was stolen. They emphasize that Russia hacked the election and question the validity of President Trump's victory. They mention protests and violence that occurred after the election. The speakers express their anger and frustration, calling Trump an illegitimate president. They also mention efforts to overturn the election results. Overall, they believe the election was not fair and express concerns about the future.

The speaker mentions a discussion about something, but it is not clear what they are referring to. They mention someone named John and his wife, but it is unclear what they are talking about. They state that they are not going to discuss it. The speaker also mentions that they are not at the White House and that someone was not elected yet. They apologize for moving on and say they are in trouble now.

The speaker accuses the other side of welcoming fraud and illegal voting without evidence. If proof is provided, they will continue reporting. The claim of rigging and cheating is serious, but more details are needed before making conclusions. Stay tuned for updates.

The speaker claims to have won the election but was robbed of the job due to cheating. They believe the election was stolen from the people of Georgia and that thousands of voters had their voices stolen. They refuse to concede because they believe the process was unfair and the result was not true or right. They acknowledge that their opponent won an adequate number of votes but do not consider them the legitimate governor. They still believe their opponent won through voter suppression. The speaker emphasizes that the election was not fair and accuses their opponent of dismantling democracy in Georgia. They do not consider themselves the governor of Georgia.

The speaker claims that someone received 14,000,000 votes but was thrown out of office. The speaker states this action is a threat to democracy. The speaker also claims that this person hates the woman who ran instead of him and cannot stand her.

- Speaker 0 states they believe certain people are dishonest and crooked and that they may have to pay a price; they insist they are truly bad and dishonest people, and imply consequences may follow. - Speaker 1 discusses a criminal investigation into James Comey and John Brennan related to the so-called Russian collusion hoax, asserting they tried to ruin Trump’s life and that he prevailed. - Speaker 1 notes that for years, ranking members of Congress, the intelligence community, and the FBI claimed Donald Trump was colluding with Russia to win the 2016 election, and that this was continued through his first presidency. - Speaker 2 references emails suggesting Donald Trump Jr. was willing to collude with Russia, questioning how to know what happens when Trump and Putin meet, and suggests Trump’s repeated denials of collusion may have been truthful. - Speaker 3 asks if there has been any evidence of collusion, coordination, or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, and Speaker 2 disagrees, saying there is plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight. - Speaker 1 cites a recently declassified CIA “lessons learned” document from John Ratcliffe noting that the investigation was messed up, aimed at preventing Trump from winning and then hampering his agenda, and mentions multiple procedural anomalies in the preparation of the ICA (intelligence community assessment). - They walk through the timeline: Christopher Steele, a former MI-6 officer with Russian intel expertise, was hired by Fusion GPS, which was paid by Perkins Coie for Hillary Clinton’s campaign (notably Mark Elias) to produce opposition research on Trump; this unvetted dossier was used to bolster the case and was shopped to media to create a narrative of Trump-Russia ties, then used as a legal hook to push a narrative. - Speaker 1 argues Hillary Clinton leveraged influence to funnel the unverified dossier into the FBI and into a FISA warrant for Carter Page, noting it was not disclosed that the dossier was funded by Hillary Clinton, which they view as a major omission. - Ratcliffe’s document is cited as saying including the Steele dossier in the ICA undermined credibility and ran counter to tradecraft principles. - A second parallel element involved Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian lawyer paid by Fusion GPS and Clinton campaign, who met Don Jr. at Trump Tower; Don Jr. texted during the meeting that he was unsure what was happening, and the meeting was publicly used to support the Steele dossier claims about Trump’s ties to Russia. - The Speaker covers Hillary Clinton’s classified server issue, including the use of BleachBit and hammers, and notes DNC servers were hacked by Russia; they frame these events as being used to shift focus to Trump collusion. - They describe Crossfire Hurricane as the investigation into Trump, calling it an “insurance policy” to deflect attention from Clinton’s classified server issues and to portray Trump as guilty, describing the investigations into Trump associates (Papadopoulos, Carter Page, Manafort, Flynn) as efforts to keep the narrative alive even after Trump’s election victory. - Speaker 1 asserts Mueller’s appointment was scope-limited but later expanded, allowing broad access and substantial taxpayer cost; Brennan and Comey are accused of feeding initial information for a political purpose, with high-level agency involvement and misrepresentation in Congress. - They claim there was never any actual evidence of Russian collusion charged against the Trump campaign. - They mention Charles McGonigal, a former FBI counterintelligence official, as someone charged in connection with Russia, implying the broader narrative was invalid and asserting that those involved lied. - The speakers conclude that the entire setup was a scam and express a desire for accountability.

The speakers discuss the legitimacy of the 2016 election and claim that it was stolen. They mention Russia hacking the election and the belief that Trump is an illegitimate president. They also talk about protests and violence that occurred after the election. Overall, they express anger and disbelief towards the election results.

The speakers discuss concerns about election legitimacy, mentioning Russian interference, Al Gore's loss in 2000, and issues with electronic voting machines. They express doubts about the fairness of various elections, including Stacey Abrams' loss in Georgia. The overall sentiment is that elections have been stolen through voter suppression and flawed processes.

The speaker discusses a situation where an election result hinged on a single vote, which they find statistically improbable. They mention a previously uncounted vote that was discovered, potentially creating a tie or necessitating a recount. The speaker raises concerns about 800 canceled votes and questions the criteria and oversight involved in rejecting votes. They call for transparency and scrutiny of every rejected vote, suggesting potential errors or biases in the process. The speaker questions Elections Canada and whether they will review every single thing. They express the opinion that winning by one vote in this scenario suggests possible manipulation, implying someone may have arbitrarily decided the outcome.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of allowing the constitutional process to continue, ensuring every legal ballot is counted and no illegal ones are included. They stress the need for faith in the election system. Another speaker expresses concern over the current state of the government, with the Supreme Court lacking a full bench and the executive branch leaderless. The fate of the next president is seen as being in the hands of politicians who may be influenced by personal gain or manipulation.

In a hypothetical Biden vs. Trump election, Speaker 1 expresses their hesitation to vote for Biden. They do not explicitly state their support for Trump but acknowledge the challenging decision they face.

The speaker thanks someone, referred to as "Mister president," and expresses appreciation. The speaker notes that it's a very exciting day and promises reaction and analysis to what was just heard. The speaker also mentions "the ones that didn't vote for your bills but run on them."

It seems like there are concerns about election integrity and potential fraud. The speaker mentions the Mesa Docks and dropbox, suggesting that there may be issues with these. They also criticize the reporters on TV for not being truthful. The speaker believes that if there are more votes than voters, it should not be questioned. They mention Georgia Claws and ballot mules, implying that there may be manipulation happening. The speaker accuses those in power of not caring about the truth and suggests that lawsuits are being used to delay the process. They emphasize the importance of holding those responsible accountable.

The speaker expresses frustration over Biden's lack of speaking at three different locations. They suggest that the election was rigged and criticize the way the war was handled. The speaker questions whether those in power truly love the country. They express gratitude towards the audience and emphasize the importance of a good outcome.