TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I tried making payments in a Chinese supermarket without money, card, or phone. I scanned my face and the payment was done in seconds. What do you think? Is this amazing technology or just weird and unnecessary? Let me know in the comments.

Individuals enrolling in TSA PreCheck or Global Entry sign a release granting the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI unrestricted, warrantless access to all their personal data. This includes health records, physical and mental information, social media, communications, and court history. This access is indefinite. People are giving up their rights permanently for the convenience of faster passage through security. This sweeping surrender of privacy is in the fine print that few people read.

In 10 years, drones could use facial recognition for surveillance, posing privacy concerns. TSA now takes photos at airports, raising questions about government data collection. The erosion of liberty and government intrusion is a growing concern, with dissent being targeted in the United States.

At the Tucson airport, a sign indicates that non-US citizens without passports should enter a specific line. Surprisingly, TSA allows an arrest warrant as a valid form of ID for illegal aliens. If an arrest warrant can secure a domestic flight for them, it raises the question of why it can't lead to their arrest. As a member of Congress with TSA pre-check, I must verify my identity. If my airline ticket lists my name as Wesley J Hunt, I cannot board the plane, highlighting the inconsistency in the system.

The digital ID provides government the ability to track, analyze, predict, and control a person's private activities. It is the antithesis of individual freedom and will not require an implantable chip as many have feared for decades. Evidence clearly shows that biometrics such as fingerprints and facial scans will do the job much more efficiently. And the aftermath of the COVID lockdown shows us how it will be deployed. During the COVID era, governments said that masks were recommended, while private companies said no mask, no entry. And the public overwhelmingly complied, but not with an overreaching government. They complied with the grocery store to buy food, the airlines to travel, and their own banks to access money. Looking back, it is quite clear. The COVID lockdowns provided an opportunity to beta test digital ID compliance through private company mandates and helps normalize the use of QR scans and facial pics for entry into private businesses. And it proved to be a success. Now we are seeing the same techniques being used with the rollout of the digital ID. The gold standard for biometric regulation was written in 2008 as the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act and is being replicated all over The United States. It mandates that private entities obtain written consent before collecting biometrics, disclose their policies, and destroy data after a set period. And most importantly, it exempts government entities entirely, allowing state and federal government to collect and utilize biometric data while passing the liability to private corporations. These laws have been met with over a thousand class action lawsuits since 2015, which resulted in the standardization of consent prompts in apps and services, such as a firm's biometric consent, which now states by clicking accept or proceeding, you consent to collection of biometric data. Click a button and you're in the new system. If government were to mandate the digital ID, it would predictably ignite mass protest. We can see this happening today in The UK. The United States will avoid this by utilizing the private sector in what appears to be voluntary action. The FBI's Clearview AI has harvested over 30,000,000,000 faces from social media. And because Clearview is technically a private company, the FBI has access to all this without the need for asking. In over 43 states, the Department of Motor Vehicles have sold driver's license photos to private firms who resold to local police for facial recognition. The government doesn't need to mandate biometric ID, which would most likely be considered a violation of American rights. And so it outsources the mandate to private companies who are legally required to get consent, while the government is free to collect and utilize this data under legal immunity. Just like the COVID era, you will be free to give consent. But if you choose not to, you will have to leave the reservation and find a way to fend for yourself. Greg Reiss reporting. The Reiss report is now fully funded by my Substack subscribers. Subscribe today and support my work at gregreese.substack.com.

Speaker 0 describes a facial recognition van; a man covered his face to avoid being caught by police cameras. Police stopped him and photographed him anyway. There’s claimed to be no law against covering one’s face, and Speaker 0 says, “you let him go then.” Speaker 1 counters, suggesting it might be because “I don’t consent to being on there,” calling it “government overreach.” Speaker 0 continues: “Don't cover my face. Don't push me over when I'm walking down the street.” The police deemed this disorderly behavior and issued a fine; Speaker 0 shows a £90 fine and notes that “there you go. Look at that.” He asserts that the man has a right to cover his face and can walk away. Speaker 1 adds: “We live in a country which is free. We don’t have to carry ID. So we don’t live in a state where the police have the right to see your ID willy nilly. This takes away my freedom because you're IDing me without asking.”

The UK government plans to upload all 45 million passport photos into a police facial recognition database without consent or legislation. This move allows the police to access the passport database and other custody images, creating the largest biometric database for UK policing. However, this expansion of facial recognition surveillance is seen as intrusive and inaccurate, posing a threat to the public's right to privacy. Big Brother Watch is actively opposing this technology, emphasizing the need to protect individual privacy rights.

Speaker 0 argues against using TSA scanners when traveling. They state that epic.org reached out to TSA members and asked for studies on the scanners, but there are no safety studies. They claim TSA workers are contracting large illnesses, “the big C,” because they work next to the scanners and because those scanners are operating on five g and x-rays. They assert that passengers are x-rayed without a blanket every time, that millimeter waves cook people, and that the scanners allow viewing people nude. They advise travelers not to go through TSA scanners, and to opt for a pat-down instead. They claim that if enough people refuse to go through the scanners, the program would end. They recount the origin story: an alleged Al Qaeda individual who came from Amsterdam to Detroit, leading to the rollout of scanners across America, with the requirement to remove shoes, belts, waters, valuables, and anything else. They imply that this incident sparked the widespread adoption of scanners nationwide. The speaker emphasizes that anybody told they need to go through these scanners should refuse and request a pat-down, labeling the scanners as “goofy.” They reiterate the call to opt out and not participate in the scanner process, presenting the narrative as a justification for avoiding the scanners.

"You're planning a trip to Europe, you're gonna have to hand over way more than your" "passport when you get there. The as part of a new entry exit system, visitors to most European countries will have to provide four fingerprints and a facial photo at a self operated kiosk." "The information will be stored for three years with the photo being used for ID verification on later visits." "Travelers who refuse to provide their biometric data will be denied entry." "The goal of the program is to enhance security and speed up border crossings, it is said." "The new system is set to be rolled out over six months starting in October and applies to 29 countries, including popular destinations like France, Italy, and Spain."

They're rolling out digital ID even when people don't want it? In The UK, over 2,000,000 people said no. We don't want it. The government's response? We're gonna do it anyway. And now the line is no digital ID, no jobs. They said you will not be able to work in The United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID. It's as simple as that. Just a reminder, pilot programs always start somewhere and then scale to the rest of the world. Today, it's The UK. Tomorrow, it's where you live. They will market it as if it's for your convenience or your safety, like they are doing now by saying it's to tackle illegal immigration. But once your likelihood is tied to a QR code or a government app, your freedoms can be taken away with the flip of a switch. Now it's just for a job. Soon it will be banking, travel, grocery shopping. You will be completely under control.

I'm currently being detained by USAID Cairo, right outside the gate. They've seized my driver's license and demanded my passport and phone, even though we haven't entered the facility or taken any pictures this time. They recognized me from my visit last week, and it seems they were waiting for us. They blocked the car and are now suggesting I'm a terrorist, despite knowing I have no such intentions. They're also aware of my viral tweet from my previous visit. Just wanted to let you know, so if I suddenly disappear, you'll know what happened.

I refuse to comply with mandates that infringe on our rights. This is just the start of a slippery slope. I urge others in law enforcement and healthcare to stand up against this overreach. Giving in will only lead to more restrictions on our freedoms. Let's not be fooled by false promises.

The CBP One app, used by migrants claiming asylum, is now accepted at TSA checkpoints in the Miami airport's Delta terminal as valid ID for boarding planes. The CBP One app was intended to validate non-US citizen travel documentation when a traveler lacks acceptable ID. According to the speaker, migrants can enter any information into the app, even those wanted for crimes. Photos are optional, and biographical information is not stored. The speaker questions how people from terror watch list countries can use this process. The speaker contrasts this with the Real ID requirement for Americans by May 2025 to board flights. They question how illegal immigrants can board planes with unverifiable information while Americans face stricter ID requirements.

I went to vote and found out someone with my exact name and birthday in the same state has already voted. When they scanned my license, it showed I had voted, but I haven't. My name is unique, and the only difference was the address. This seems strange, especially since I'm not registered to vote, which might explain the issue. Overall, it feels sketchy.

Delta Airlines, United, and JetBlue Airways have implemented facial recognition boarding systems at various airports. This technology creates a face map with unique measurements and converts it into a biometric token or face print. Companies claim that this system offers speed, convenience, security, and contactless benefits for customers. However, lawmakers in some states are seeking stricter regulations due to privacy concerns and allegations of bias. Research suggests that facial recognition is less accurate for people of color and women. The decision to use this technology depends on knowing the company providing the service, the expected benefits, and local laws regarding data collection and facial recognition usage.

Homeland Security Secretary Christine Noem announced that Real ID enforcement would begin May 7, requiring a high-resolution digital facial image to travel by air or visit federal buildings. She claimed these IDs enhance security and prevent fraud. This announcement received backlash, including criticism from Thomas Massie, who called Real ID unnecessary and a tool for control. Massie argued that Real ID won't stop terrorists and pointed out that the 9/11 hijackers held passports from other countries. Real ID was signed into law in 2005 by President George W. Bush and authored by James Sensenbrenner, who also authored the Patriot Act. Massie explained that Real ID isn't a database itself but proof that a physical person matches an entry in a digital database. He warned that its power will be realized when everyone complies and that records, such as vax records or gun records, could be added to it.

Age verification is a normalization of identification. It's the introduction of digital surveillance. It's the end of privacy, and it's giving the state and corporation excessive powers and creating more KYC honeypots. The speaker thinks we should fight that because we're now going to start seeing this crippling in to any centralised, large social media website.

The speaker discusses a program called VERIFAST, describing it as facial recognition that requires users to scan their face when applying for an apartment or buying a house. They claim you must move your face left and right and have the biometrics uploaded into a database in order to rent or purchase a property. The speaker notes that in Arizona, many apartment complexes are rolling this out, questioning why there is a need to scan faces and suggesting it’s concerning that politicians or people who defend them are not being scanned while ordinary citizens are. The speaker also mentions Discord as discussing this with kids, calling that sickening, and claims Etsy is doing something similar to process payments, requiring a face scan that involves moving the face left and right. They compare the situation to a concept from the “mark of the beast,” expressing concern that voluntary consent without objection could lead to a troubling future. The speaker urges listeners to look up VERIFAST and to resist if someone tries to impose this practice, using a defensive, PG-friendly phrasing. Overall, the main points are: - VERIFAST is described as a facial-recognition system requiring a face scan with left-right movement to access housing-related transactions, with biometrics uploaded to a database. - In Arizona, the technology is allegedly being rolled out by apartment complexes. - The speaker questions why politicians’ faces aren’t scanned and highlights perceived inconsistencies in who is subjected to the system. - Discord is mentioned as discussing this issue with children, and Etsy is claimed to be implementing a similar facial-scan payment verification. - The speaker draws a controversial parallel to the mark of the beast and warns that consent without vocal objection could lead to a troubling future. - listeners are urged to look up VERIFAST and push back if pressured to participate.

The Biden administration is allowing migrants to bypass ID checks at airports, raising security concerns. A recent DHS report reveals that illegal migrants can use the CBP One app instead of traditional identification, even choosing whether to allow officers to take their photo. This practice may inadvertently increase national security risks, according to the inspector general. A DHS spokesperson disputed the report, claiming it lacks context. However, the national security director for air marshals emphasized that unvetted individuals on flights pose a threat, as they can repeatedly fly without proper identification, often on taxpayer-funded flights.

Tickets for Fazil Fears, regular or VIP. Can't take a large bill. Use my debit instead. Need ID or driver's license. Gotta make a copy every time you swipe. New policy. Don't want copies of my cards everywhere. Don't want it stolen? Not responsible. Can pay with cash. It's fine. This place feels weird. Strange policy. When did it start? 3228. What? Hold on. Tried to pay with a 100, they said... Let's get out of here.

TSA is now using facial recognition software to take photos of travelers, which can be opted out of. However, agents often pressure individuals to comply. This morning in Newark, I clearly stated my desire to opt out, but an agent insisted I had to have my photo taken. I had to go to another agent to formally refuse. It's frustrating that this has become the norm. Additionally, there are concerns about the government's push for a nationwide real ID, which would create a federal database of personal information. The combination of mandatory facial recognition and the real ID initiative raises significant privacy issues for travelers.

The discussion centers on concerns about REAL ID and its potential implications for privacy and freedom. It's argued that REAL ID violates the Tenth Amendment and is a step toward a national identification system that could lead to a social credit system like China's. The American Association for Motor Vehicle Administrators allegedly plans to digitize REAL ID, making it remotely accessible. The Secretary of Homeland Security's authority to determine additional uses for REAL ID is criticized, fearing it could be required for various activities. The claim that a REAL ID is required to fly by May 7 is refuted, citing a two-year progressive enforcement rule. The speakers urge people to refuse REAL ID, switch back to standard state driver's licenses, and contact legislators to repeal REAL ID in their states. They believe the system is built on biometrics, allowing the government to claim ownership of body parts for control and tracking. They encourage people to share their airport experiences and fund billboards to raise awareness.

In China, there is a disturbing situation where I am unable to buy food. My uncle and cousin helped me get a cell phone linked to a Chinese bank card, but now it has been flagged. I have to go through facial recognition verification just to use my gift card balance on this debit card. It's terrifying to open my mouth for verification. Thankfully, the Chinese app is not racist, but unfortunately, I did not pass the verification.

I flew into Tucson and realized it was packed, so I don't recommend flying out of there. Despite being a loyal American Airlines customer, I advise against flying with them right now. On my flight, there were many individuals with paper IDs who were likely not attending the Trump rally. It's frustrating to pay full price while they use our tax dollars to enter the country. The security line for these individuals is longer, and the smell is unpleasant. If you voted for Biden, you're responsible for this situation. Some of them even complained about the TSA taking too long. Boarding for flight 2926 to Dallas is about to begin. If you still support Democrats in Tucson, you're foolish.