reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Most packaged meat in supermarkets is likely to be genetically modified unless it comes from a local farmer who feeds their animals non-GMO feed. The Cerrolini study in France found that the chemical paired with modified seeds, which are only available with a contract to buy Roundup, is toxic to human embryo cells. The president of Episit claimed to have developed corn that makes male sperm infertile, suggesting it as a solution to overpopulation. Some individuals aim to reduce the human population, viewing people as a cancer. Unfortunately, there are powerful individuals who are not mentally stable.

Speaker 0 discusses Bill Gates’ alleged involvement with Tyrana Biosciences, stating that Gates has donated $50,000,000 to a new company called Tyrana Biosciences, and that they are going to create a new category of biologically modified crops. One of Tyrana’s first targets is soybeans, according to the speaker. The speaker claims that the product will not be detectable as modified, nor labeled as GMO, because the EPA has said that it is, quote, “naturally occurring compounds and is not GMO.” The speaker explains the mechanism: it is taking RNA from a virus and using it to insert whatever gene they want into whatever crop they want. Once the RNA is inside the plant, it replicates, and it gives it different features. The company allegedly brags that they can create whatever feature they want. One of their targets is to make it more insect resistant, so the speaker says you’re going to put insecticides within the food. The speaker states that Tyrana is targeting tomatoes, corn, and soybeans first. The claim is that it will not be labeled as modified or GMO. The speaker asserts that Bill Gates is betting on making profit by genetically modifying our food without telling us. The speaker claims that the EPA has already given it the green light.

Speaker 0 describes a controversial 2000 study and its alleged connections to Monsanto. The speaker asserts that Monsanto staff helped write the article, and that the authors were likely receiving large sums of money from Monsanto. They claim much of the data in the study was unpublished, describing it as secret data from Monsanto, and label the paper “basically a complete fraud.” The study supposedly claimed that glyphosate was safe and not linked to cancer. The speaker then references subsequent studies released recently, which purportedly found that glyphosate increased or caused ten distinct types of cancer in rats when the rats were exposed at so-called safe levels. Despite these findings, the speaker notes that the original paper was used by agencies around the world to claim glyphosate was safe and to support approval processes. The speaker concludes that the entire foundation of those safety assurances was built on “a complete fraud and lie,” and states that the retraction of the 2000 paper is, in this context, something they are happy about, remarking that it is probably the only time they will be happy about a retraction.

In 2001, a California Biotech company patented a gene that causes sterility in both men and women when consumed. Men become sterile if they eat the Episite gene, while women become infertile when their bodies produce antibodies to the deposited sperm. DuPont and Monsanto later purchased the company and commercialized the gene. The speaker questions whether the food we consume, including that of our children and grandchildren, contains this gene. However, the FDA has made it illegal for consumers to have access to this information under current laws.

Speaker 0 asserts that Bill Gates is not a philanthropist because he “gives a little bit of money to take over entire sectors.” They say Gates works on seed, with the big seed banks described as the “CJR system.” The claim is that “he gives a million here, but he takes all the seeds of that system, the ICRISAT system.” They assert that all of the world’s seed banks are now controlled by Gates through this method. The summary continues: Gates “finances the Swalbat seed bank,” then “he creates patent systems.” He is said to develop and promote technologies for patenting, including gene editing technologies and digital sequence technologies, thereby controlling the seeds of the world. They claim Gates “destroys the international system that controls the country’s rights to their seed,” naming the Convention on Biological Diversity and the FAO treaty on seed. They say he “destroys and undercuts them so that all the seeds of the world are his seeds,” and that he can be the Newman Santo on a global scale. Later, it is asserted that Gates is “the biggest farmland owner of America.” The speaker contends Gates coined a term, “net zero,” and that Gates says climate problems can be solved by net zero. They insist it doesn’t mean emission reductions; rather, “we will con” [likely "we will con" is a fragment] and that we will absorb pollution via “offsets” on other people’s lands. The claim is that Gates “flies a private jet and has all the private jet services of the world.” They say he bought “all the land in America,” but he “wants our land for carbon offsets.” The overall assertion is that this is the climate strategy described as net zero, and that it constitutes a “land grabber” approach through carbon offsets.

Farmers have been saving and planting seeds for thousands of years, but the idea of corporations owning food crops is relatively new. In the 1980s, the Supreme Court allowed the patenting of life, leading to companies like Monsanto patenting valuable crops. Monsanto, a chemical company known for products like DDT and Agent Orange, developed Roundup and genetically engineered soybeans that could resist it. Farmers initially resisted the idea of not being able to save their own seeds, but over time, acceptance grew. Now, if a farmer saves seeds, Monsanto, the main company involved, may send investigators to look into the matter.

Monsanto found bacteria surviving Roundup in a waste dump, leading to Roundup-ready soybeans. Glyphosate in Roundup depletes nutrients in plants, weakens them, and promotes disease. Livestock eat Roundup-ready crops, leading to nutrient deficiency. FDA memos reveal GMO dangers in animal feed, with toxins bioaccumulating in animals and milk. 95% of genetic modifications aim to withstand more chemicals and drugs, altering genes in plants, animals, and humans permanently. Translation: Monsanto discovered bacteria resistant to Roundup in a waste dump, resulting in Roundup-ready soybeans. Glyphosate in Roundup depletes plant nutrients, weakens them, and promotes disease. Livestock consuming Roundup-ready crops face nutrient deficiencies. FDA memos expose GMO risks in animal feed, with toxins accumulating in animals and milk. 95% of genetic modifications aim to withstand more chemicals and drugs, altering genes in plants, animals, and humans permanently.

Today across a huge number of crops, there is discussion of genetically modified food. Our foundation is working with partners, for example DuPont Pioneer on some new maize things, with ADM on some cocoa growing things. Some of these are traditional breeding and some are transgenic. In parallel, we're funding scientific expertise in Africa so that, three or four years from now, if things go as expected, there are some crops with big benefits like drought resistance. The transgenic approach probably can do better than any other country in deciding what the benefits are and what the risks, what's known about it, safety, IP licensing, and things that would make them hesitant. And they'll, on their own, be able to make that decision. The likelihood that the safety profile will be okay and that it will be beneficial, I hope that works out because it is a tool, particularly for disease resistance, where you can put in a new gene called an RNA interference gene for a particular crop problem, it would be a real help. And you're right on the verge of starvation all the time, so every tool that's safe and appropriate, you Alan Kuhlman (DuPont) does produce genetically modified food as well as many other things, high yielding varieties. Are you facing a lot of resistance through a little knowledge is a dangerous thing kind of approach? Or are you confident that GM is the future? Speaker 2: Well, think that if you're going to resolve problems like drought resistance, you're gonna have to use genetic modification to get there. You know, I can't think of a product in terms of genetically modified seed that has been more tested and more thoroughly vetted in many of the countries that currently allow it to grow. I think in 2008, we surpassed 2,000,000,000 acres globally where biotech crops are grown. And so there is a lot of data out there, there's a lot of information, and there's a lot of benefits to it. But I think Bill's right. Each country, if they set a science based transparent regulatory framework, then the industry can work with those countries in order to bridge that gap and the productivity that is needed to fill that food gap. Speaker 1: So in Vietnam,

Seed companies pressure farmers to buy their seeds by threatening lawsuits if farmers use their own seeds. Farmers must pay fees to plant genetically modified seeds and risk being audited if they don't repurchase. This system leaves farmers without ownership of their crops, as companies can claim rights to any genetic traces found. For example, buying seeds for 300 acres of soybeans cost over $30,000.

Genetically modified food is not labeled in the US due to FDA regulations, as it's considered equivalent to unmodified food. Consumers are kept in the dark about GMO ingredients to prevent confusion. The FDA relies on safety assessments from the patent-holding companies like Monsanto, Pfizer, or Syngenta, without conducting independent studies. FDA scientists have expressed concerns about this practice, urging against allowing GMO foods on the market due to unknown consequences.

Speaker 0 describes a range of claims about food modification, environmental engineering, and public health interventions. He states that many basics, including tomato, potato, asparagus, broccoli, and cauliflower, are purposely modified, and mentions a “terminator seed” concept, claiming farmers cannot plant seed unless purchased from the government. He notes seeds come up one season and are gone, and asserts watermelon is modified to be seedless. He asserts that the air we breathe is contaminated with toxins, and that chemical sprays are used over 245 major U.S. cities and around the world. He alleges the presence of electronic metal, small in the air, and explains this is done with “Gwen towers,” HARP programs (high frequency active auroral research project), ILATA in Russia (electrified atmospheric discharge), ISACAT in Europe (scattered radar manipulation). He claims these systems broadcast billions of watts, resulting in billions of watts of ionic electrified air particles in the air we breathe. He lists contaminants such as titanium, aluminum, barium, nonhuman T cells, and other substances sprayed from ships, along with emissions from smokestacks and cars, which collectively contribute to metal particulates and electrified air that are poisonous to the body. He asserts that the body will age quickly and cells will deteriorate unless these factors are addressed. He describes people as “dumb toe,” “comatose,” “dumb down,” “brainwashed,” “vaccinated,” “inoculated,” and “encrypted,” claiming that encryption includes being chipped if the person encounters a prosthetic device or certain lab work, implying that food, vaccines, and military service can render a person encrypted. He equates encryption with mind control in many cases, and suggests that those who are not encrypted are mind controlled. He warns that there is extensive activity and apathy among people, expressing concern about a planet being manipulated and controlled by forces described as globalists. He contends that the globalists are on their way out, describing their behavior as crazy and noting that their time is short while consciousness endures. He emphasizes the existence of a dichotomy in humanity (black and white, brown and yellow) as part of this described undermining control and manipulation. The overarching message is a warning about modified foods, chemtrails, advanced atmospheric and surveillance technologies, encryption and mind-control concerns, vaccines, and a perceived decline in human agency, with a claim that globalist forces are fading but still active.

The speaker explains that they never switched to Monsanto Soybeans because they were getting good yields with conventional soybeans. They mention that their neighbors all use GMO soybeans, which can affect their crops. Another speaker points out that when a crop is genetically modified, the company owns it, which is a new concept in agriculture. They compare Monsanto to Microsoft, saying that Monsanto aims to own the intellectual property behind most of the food in America. Public plant breeding is now rare, and there are only a few varieties of soybeans available. The speaker expresses concern about not being able to buy certified seed and mentions a blacklist of unauthorized growers. They are on the list because they refused to turn over their records. The speaker concludes by discussing the limitations they face in choosing what to plant.

Speaker 0 explains that in the agriculture appropriations bill, they tried to defund research for transgenic edible plant vaccines. They describe the concept as scary and state that taxpayer dollars are funding research on vaccines produced in lettuce and spinach, such that when people eat those leafy greens, they would be vaccinated with whatever vaccine the plant is producing. The speaker asserts that there is a belief this approach amounts to “playing God with our spinach,” and argues that if someone wants to pursue this, tighter rules are probably necessary because pollen can escape and pollute plants in neighboring farms that did not intend to grow vaccines in their food. The speaker notes that they attempted to put rules on this issue in the agriculture appropriations bill and were able to stop taxpayer spending in that bill. However, the speaker states that the bill was thrown in the trash and an omnibus was passed instead. As a result, the speaker warns that there will be “another year of transgenic edible plant vaccine research,” and indicates that this topic will be a post of its own. In summary, the speaker highlights the following points: the existence of research funded with taxpayer dollars into transgenic edible plant vaccines produced in vegetables like lettuce and spinach; the concern about potential vaccination through consumption of these plants; the risk posed by pollen dispersion to neighboring farms; an effort to restrict funding via the agriculture appropriations bill that was ultimately unsuccessful due to the bill being discarded in favor of an omnibus; and the expectation that such research will continue for another year. The overall message emphasizes opposition to funding this line of research and points to procedural outcomes that hindered the attempted defunding, while noting that the broader effort and its controversy would be revisited in a future post.

Monsanto scientists discovered bacteria at a chemical waste dump that could survive Roundup herbicide. They took the gene from the bacteria and inserted it into soybeans, creating Roundup Ready soybeans. These soybeans can be sprayed with Roundup without dying, but it kills other plant biodiversity. Roundup's active ingredient, glyphosate, was patented as a chelator that deprives plants of essential minerals and harms beneficial microorganisms in the soil. Livestock in the US consume Roundup Ready crops, leading to nutrient-deficient food. The toxins in genetically modified feed can accumulate in animals and their milk, posing a risk to human health. The majority of Canadian and American crops are genetically modified or contaminated. Genetic modifications are primarily done to make plants resistant to chemicals and animals resistant to drugs, but consuming them can alter our genes permanently.

The transcript presents a claim that seed companies pressure farmers to buy their seeds, contributing to higher food costs. It asserts that farmers can be sued if they plant their own seeds, and that farmers do not own the genetics of their crops unless they use heirloom seeds. To plant these seeds, farmers must pay a fee, and seed companies can come onto a farmer’s property to inspect plants; if any part contains the company’s genetics, the farmer can be sued. The speaker emphasizes that farmers do not own the hard work of growing the plant because of these seed-ownership practices. Seed companies are described as reminding farmers of their purchasing history by saying, “we know you bought our seed last year,” and that if farmers do not buy seeds again, the companies will audit them. The speaker then shares a personal example: an order of three totes, sufficient to plant 300 acres of soybeans and to have the right to plant them, cost over $30,000.

During the Vietnam War, the American government compelled seven chemical companies, including Monsanto, to create Agent Orange. The same companies then sold patented seeds to farmers, which now cover 80% of American farmland. These seeds, including corn, soybeans, alfalfa, and wheat, were created to be resistant to Roundup, which is also owned by Monsanto. Roundup contains glyphosate, which is claimed to be a neurotoxin. These crops are subsidized by the government and are largely used to make ultra-processed food, which makes up 60-90% of the standard American diet. The speaker claims that the majority of American families are eating this food because the government deems it safe.

Bill Gates has donated $50,000,000 to Tyrana Biosciences, creating a category of biologically modified crops. One of their targets is soybeans, but you won't know you're buying a modified soybean because our EPA has said it is, quote, naturally occurring compounds and is not GMO. They're using RNA from a virus to insert whatever gene they want into whatever crop they want. Once the RNA is inside the plant, it replicates and gives features, and the company brags they can create whatever feature they want. One of their targets is to make it more insect resistant. So you're gonna put insecticides within the food. They're targeting tomatoes, corn, and soybeans. It will not be labeled as modified, and it will not be labeled as GMO. But Bill Gates is betting on making profit by genetically modifying our food without telling us. Our EPA has already given it the green light.

A speaker discusses genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the debate surrounding their safety, mentioning a petition signed by 17 Nobel laureates asserting their safety. The speaker says that while millions have consumed GMOs without apparent harm, the context is important. The speaker explains that GMOs are often engineered to resist glyphosate, and glyphosate is used heavily. Glyphosate is described as an antibiotic, patented for antibiotic use, that kills microbiota around plants. The speaker claims that glyphosate is the most prescribed antibiotic on Earth, especially in rice farming, and that the consequences of its widespread use are unknown.

GMOs, or genetically modified organisms, were once believed to be a solution for world hunger, promising benefits like drought resistance, higher yields, improved nutrition, and reduced pesticide use. However, the reality is quite different. The majority of GMOs on the market today serve two purposes: producing insecticides within the plant itself and being resistant to herbicides. This means that bugs that consume these plants die, and the plants can be sprayed with toxic herbicides without being harmed. Consequently, we are now consuming plants that act as pesticide factories and have been exposed to herbicides.

The speaker questions the safety of glyphosate, the key ingredient in Roundup, despite claims from Bayer that it does not cause cancer. They cite 180,000 lawsuits against Bayer, resulting in over $12 billion in damages, and Bayer's efforts to prevent future glyphosate-related cancer lawsuits. Roundup Ready crops, genetically engineered to resist glyphosate, led to a surge in its use, with approximately 60% of crops now treated with it. The speaker highlights a letter from members of Congress arguing against glyphosate overregulation, suggesting that without it, widespread hunger will occur. They point out that some signatories, like Deb Fischer and Chuck Grassley, are major recipients of funding from big agriculture and biotech companies like Bayer, DuPont, and Dow. The speaker implies that these contributions influence their support for glyphosate.

Most packaged meat in supermarkets is likely to be genetically modified unless it comes from a local farmer who feeds their animals non-GMO feed. The Cerrolini study in France found that the chemical paired with modified seeds, which are only available with a contract to buy Roundup, is toxic to human embryo cells. The president of Episit claimed to have developed corn that makes male sperm infertile, suggesting it as a solution to overpopulation. Some individuals aim to reduce the human population, viewing people as a cancer. Unfortunately, there are powerful individuals who are not mentally stable.

Charanjit and his family in Northern Indian Punjab bought expensive genetically modified cotton seeds from Monsanto, hoping for higher yields. However, insects destroyed their crops for two consecutive years, leaving them with insurmountable debts of €6,500. Despite the worsening harvests, they continue to use Monsanto seeds as there are limited alternatives available. Monsanto has dominated 95% of the Indian market since entering the country 14 years ago, claiming that farmers prefer their seeds. Activists argue that Monsanto is responsible for the farmers' suicides, accusing the company of deceiving them for higher profits. Pests destroy the cotton, forcing farmers to borrow money to purchase expensive pesticides.

Monsanto scientists discovered bacteria at a chemical waste dump that could survive Roundup herbicide. They inserted the gene responsible for this into soybeans, creating Roundup ready crops. However, Roundup kills plant biodiversity and hinders access to essential minerals, weakening plants and promoting disease. Livestock in the US consume Roundup ready crops, leading to nutrient-deficient food. The director of the Centre For Veterinary Medicine warned that toxins in genetically modified feed could accumulate in animals and their milk. Currently, 90% of Canadian and American crops are genetically modified or contaminated. Genetic modifications primarily aim to make plants resistant to chemicals and animals resistant to drugs, but consuming them can alter our genes permanently.

Vladimir Putin passed a law that any Russian who grows or sells GMO foods is considered a terrorist. Putin is giving land to Russians who will grow food organically, stating that Russians see the West as over-vaccinated, overmedicated, overfed, and weakened by nutrient-lacking food. Monsanto is powerful enough to win court cases against GMO labeling. Buying organic is the only way to avoid GMOs, as organic farmers lose their status if they use genetically modified seeds. An organic tomato has 9 times the iron of a conventionally grown one. GMOs involve splicing DNA of different species, like a tomato and Atlantic salmon, to create new traits. Eating genetically modified food can damage your DNA because the body cannot recognize the molecules.

Four companies today control the seed system. They do not want farmers to have their own seeds. They treat farmers having their own seeds as violating their monopoly rights. The monopoly rights are created through patenting and intellectual property. Intellectual property rights means I have created something. I'm an inventor. But seed is not a machine. It is not put together. Seed is evolution forever. Seed is renewable. Seed is multiplicative. One seed can give me a thousand seeds. In the case of millets, a 100,000 seeds. When seeds are made nonrenewable and seeds are designed for use of chemicals, what happens is biodiversity starts to disappear.