TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The Department of Health sent me an email with a link to the CDC, informing me as a physician about changes to death certificates. They stated that if COVID-19 was a contributing condition, it could be listed as a cause of death. However, I disagreed because there is a separate box on death certificates for listing contributing conditions such as emphysema, asthma, or influenza. We were instructed to include COVID-19 as a cause of death, which I found concerning.

Grace's death certificate listed COVID-19 pneumonia as the cause of death, but her family believes she was actually murdered. The hospital increased her medication dosage significantly, refused to resuscitate her, and put a do not resuscitate order in place. Despite pleas from her family, nurses did not intervene, claiming Grace was a do not resuscitate patient. The family suspects foul play due to the sequence of events leading to Grace's death.

Two women are suing hospitals after their husbands died from COVID-19 treatment, not the virus itself. Both men were given remdesivir without being informed of the side effects. One widow's husband died from kidney failure after receiving the drug, while the other widow's husband died from organ failure. Both widows were not aware of the treatment their husbands were receiving and believe they would not have consented to it if they had known. They feel misled by the hospitals and are seeking answers.

I believe the hospital is responsible for my husband's death. I sought Ivermectin for him and took legal action after he had been intubated for a week. The judge ruled that I could have a certified nurse administer it, but the hospital resisted. There was a 12-hour standoff in the ICU, and they even called the police on me. I signed a waiver to assume any risks, yet they still blocked the treatment. I don't understand their refusal to provide a drug that might have helped him. Additionally, I want to know how much financial support the hospital received after his death, as it was listed as a COVID-19 death. It seems there must have been some financial incentive for their refusal to treat him properly.

Speaker 0 expresses concern about residents in care homes signing DNR forms without proper understanding or capacity. Speaker 1 discusses how COVID patients in hospitals may develop pneumonia due to prolonged bed rest. Speaker 2 warns about confusion between the generic name Remdesivir and the brand name Veclery in hospitals.

During the vaccine rollout, I witnessed people arriving in rental cars with simple coolers to administer the experimental shots in nursing homes. The shots were given to older individuals and those with dementia, who couldn't provide proper consent. Additionally, the shots were not stored at the required low temperature. This experiment had several flaws that need to be addressed.

This is wrong. Being in hospitals since 16, I know calling a patient DNR without orders is wrong. Many nurses agree but fear speaking out. Intubating people unnecessarily is a big issue. A patient was fine on oxygen, then intubated, leading to his death. Negative tests shouldn't result in intubation. It's seen as murder.

The speaker explains that they discovered a do not resuscitate (DNR) order in their grandmother's file after her death. They had heard rumors about it but had never seen it until they provided a statement to the inquiry team. The speaker's name was on the DNR order, but it was not their signature. The care home had discussed the possibility of a DNR notice with the speaker, but the speaker had explicitly stated that they did not want to authorize it. The DNR order was incomplete because the section asking if the patient was aware of it was left blank.

I shared a nurse's story about REM medication causing patients to deteriorate rapidly. Patients with high oxygen levels would suddenly crash after receiving REM, leading to organ failure and death. The nurse suspected the combination of multiple medications being administered simultaneously was causing organ failure, not just the virus itself. The nurse raised concerns about the medication's impact on patients' health and the need for further investigation.

I was by Garnet's hospital bed when a Trillium worker called to assess his organs for donation. I refused, explaining he was denied a transplant due to vaccination status. The worker agreed it was wrong. It was a shocking and offensive request, but not her fault. In the end, I won't donate his organs to a program that only gives them to vaccinated people. It's important for people to know what happened.

After getting the shot at Shoppers, she texted me, then died 7 minutes later. I insisted the shot killed her healthy mom, but the coroner claimed it was natural causes without examining her. I knew they were lying.

A patient who looked like he was dying was given morphine despite having zero pain, according to the pain score. Insulin was also administered even though his glucose was fine, and he died three minutes later. The speaker reported this case to the medical board after reviewing the chart, but they did nothing. The speaker states that this definitely went on during COVID. The speaker refers to this as euthanasia, though it is not called that. The speaker offered to send the record that was reviewed.

I’m witnessing severe medical negligence every day. Patients aren't dying from COVID; they're being killed by poor care. For example, an anesthesiologist improperly intubated a patient, leading to his death, while another patient was defibrillated despite having a stable heart rate. Nurses are making critical mistakes, like placing feeding tubes in lungs and administering incorrect insulin doses. Even when patients are critically low on blood, they aren’t receiving transfusions. Staff are overwhelmed, and management ignores the issues. I've tried advocating for patients, but no one listens. The situation feels hopeless, and I fear for the lives of those in my care. I need help to address this gross negligence before more lives are lost.

A lawsuit is in jury trial regarding hospital protocols where a young woman with Down syndrome was allegedly euthanized. According to the speaker, the hospital gave her a DNR order, even though she didn't have one. The speaker claims this is because the hospital needed the bed and believed she was going to die anyway. The patient was in the hospital for COVID. The speaker alleges that hospitals gave patients morphine and insulin to kill them. In this specific case, the hospital gave the patient a DNR, meaning if she appeared to be dying, no action would be taken. The family is suing for battery to circumvent the PREP Act, which protects doctors and hospitals from wrongdoing during COVID. The trial started in Wisconsin.

The Department of Health sent me an email with a link to the CDC, informing me as a physician about changes to death certificates. They said that if COVID-19 was a contributing condition, it could be listed as the cause of death. However, I disagreed because there is a specific box on death certificates for listing contributing conditions, such as emphysema, asthma, or influenza. We were being instructed to list COVID-19 as a cause of death.

The speaker received a call from a care home stating her father had fallen and was agitated, and would be given morphine. She was shocked he was on an end-of-life path of injecting to stop his issues. She later learned midazolam, one of the medications being used, is considered by some practitioners to be like being waterboarded because it floods the lungs. The speaker was not advised about a specific end-of-life care plan for her father. She expressed concerns to the care home manager about what she had seen and the way end-of-life care was being administered. Despite a DNR in place from the first care home, she learned her father had been mobile and trying to get to the toilet. She felt it was a random decision to keep him quiet, in isolation, in a comatose state.

The speaker's daughter was almost put on a ventilator based on incorrect test results. The speaker challenged the doctor's decision and discovered the numbers were inaccurate. The daughter was not given certain treatments and the speaker was removed from the hospital for questioning protocols. The daughter's oxygen levels were misrepresented, leading to her death from respiratory failure caused by a sedation drug. The speaker's advocacy was absent for 44 hours, during which the daughter's sedation was increased, ultimately contributing to her death. The hospital's negligence led to the daughter's death.

The speaker's brother, James, died in Ninewells Hospital in May 2021 at age 41. She describes him as a healthy, kind chef. After being taken to the hospital, she believed he was in the best place. However, she later learned from his medical records that doctors tried to put him on a ventilator, which angered her because this wasn't communicated to her. She communicated with her brother via text for the first few days, but then he was given lorazepam and ventilated. The family didn't want him on a ventilator due to low chances of recovery. He developed ventilator-associated pneumonia, which she discovered later in his records. The death certificate cited SARS COVID-2 as the cause of death. She noted a discrepancy in the time of death, raising questions about resuscitation. She requested investigations into his death, focusing on his participation in a trial where the signature on the consent form didn't appear to be his. She questioned whether trial drugs caused an allergic reaction. She also discovered he was prescribed toxomolobab, an immune suppression drug, making him more susceptible to hospital-acquired infections. She claims doctors and nurses lied to her daily.

On October 6th, my mother and I were reviewing our messages and pictures. She started experiencing breathing difficulties and her oxygen levels were at 86 to 88. The nurses claimed it was normal for someone with COPD, but my mother knew it wasn't because she had COPD for 20 years. On the 9th, her condition worsened and she became critical.

Four days after ordering a deadly injection, Dr. Picchu allegedly ordered the removal of the COVID-19 vaccination record from the patient's medical file. The speaker claims any doctor would know not to vaccinate an ill patient, especially one recently off a ventilator. The head of the ICU ordered an mRNA injection for COVID-19 for a patient less than a week removed from a mechanical ventilator. The patient died later that week. The speaker states that Dr. Picho, head of the ICU in British Columbia, still has his medical license.

A lawsuit is in jury trial regarding hospital protocols where a young woman with Down syndrome was allegedly euthanized. According to the speaker, the hospital gave her a DNR order, even though she didn't have one. The speaker claims this is because "they need the bed" and "they're gonna die anyway." The patient was in the hospital for COVID. The speaker alleges that hospitals gave patients morphine and insulin to kill them. In this case, the hospital allegedly gave the patient a DNR (do not resuscitate) order. The family is suing for battery to get around the PREP Act, which protects doctors and hospitals from wrongdoing during COVID. The trial started in Wisconsin.

I do my best to help parents understand medical interventions they signed off on, but it's concerning when they can't provide necessary information.

Patients are being harmed and dying due to gross negligence in medical care. Examples include incorrect intubation, inappropriate defibrillation on stable patients, and mismanagement of blood transfusions. Staff are failing to provide basic care, such as monitoring vital signs and addressing acidotic blood levels, leading to preventable deaths. Despite being aware of these issues, management and other staff are unresponsive, dismissing concerns about patient safety. There’s a lack of accountability, with patients often receiving inadequate treatment, particularly in a facility serving marginalized communities. The situation is dire, and there is a desperate need for intervention to prevent further loss of life.

The inquiry anticipates hearing that people were pressured into DNR notices, were not resuscitated without a notice, and may have been neglected and left to starve. Families may not have been told the truth about the cause of death, and the usual death certification process was altered. A solicitor produced a DNR order with a name printed in block letters, not a normal signature. A witness stated they told the care home categorically that they did not want a DNR order in place for their grandmother. A care home manager said there was a push from the NHS to implement more DNRs. One home received DNR/ACPR forms for all residents who didn't have one. Challenges arose when families wanted their loved ones to receive hospital treatment for non-COVID ailments, but facilities wouldn't accept them. It was stated that GPs were said to have discussed DNR forms with families, but this didn't seem to be the case. The process was rushed, with a focus on who needed a DNR because they wouldn't be able to go to the hospital. There was no individual consideration, and care homes weren't asked about a resident's health when considering DNRs. Access to ambulances and hospitals was limited, leading to DNR decisions.

I exposed fake vaccine practices, refused to comply, and faced consequences. They wanted me to fake taking it to maintain appearances. The doctor was ordered to make me fake it, which angered me. This incident should have raised red flags. Despite threats, I stood by my decision, which has since been proven right.