reSee.it - Related Video Feed

"But, what I'm most excited about is is announcement that we're going to make that we're making now, which is that the Florida Department of Health, in partnership with the governor, is going to be working to end all vaccine mandates in Florida law." "All of them. All of them. All of them." "Every last one of them. Yeah. Every last one" "Every last one of them, every last one of them is wrong and drips with disdain and and slavery. K? Who am I as a government or anyone else or who am I as a man standing here now to tell you what you should put in your body? Who" "am I to tell you what your child should put in your body? I don't have that right. Your body your body is a gift from God. What you put into your body what you put into your body is because of your relationship with your body and your God. I don't have that right." "Government does not have that right. They want you to believe they" "have that right. And, unfortunately, you know," " they've been successful. They've been successful."

The vaccine is back in the news as Republican leaders in Brevard County are set to call for an immediate ban on mRNA COVID vaccines. The executive committee believes these vaccines are a biological weapon. They are expected to vote on a letter asking state leaders to make it illegal to administer or receive mRNA vaccines in Florida. The four-page letter includes citations that support their claims, and the vote is anticipated to pass.

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine has reversed his decision to veto a bill aimed at protecting children from genital mutilation, following backlash from voters. The bill was seen as necessary and common sense in safeguarding children's well-being. In a separate discussion, concerns were raised about the safety of COVID mRNA injections, with Florida's surgeon general calling for a halt due to DNA contamination and potential risks. Dr. David Wiseman highlighted abnormal frame shift proteins elicited by the vaccines, emphasizing the need for further investigation and removal of mRNA products from the market.

Some Idaho lawmakers are proposing criminal charges for administering mRNA vaccines like COVID or flu shots. The bill would make it a misdemeanor to give these vaccines in Idaho. Senator Tammy Nichols has concerns about the vaccines being fast-tracked without full FDA approval. mRNA vaccines use messenger RNA to help cells make proteins for protection against illnesses. The bill is still in the early stages and needs further review before becoming law.

During a congressional hearing, Representative Miller questions Assistant Secretary Parker about OSHA's emergency temporary standard that would have required Americans to take the COVID vaccine or provide medical paperwork to their employers. Miller argues that OSHA does not have the power to force 84 million Americans to comply. Parker mentions that the Supreme Court ruled on the matter, but Miller accuses Parker of continuing to press companies to impose vaccine mandates even after the ruling. Miller expresses concern about the consequences for workers who refuse to comply and plans to introduce amendments to strip OSHA of its power. Parker defends OSHA's actions and mentions a proposed rule for healthcare workers.

Speaker announces that the Florida Department of Health, in partnership with the governor, is going to be working to end all vaccine mandates in Florida, Washington. All of them. Every last one of them. Every last one of them is wrong and drips with disdain and and slavery. K? Who am I as a government or anyone else? Or who am I as a man standing here now to tell you what you should put in your body? Who am I to tell you what your child should put in your body? I don't have that right. Your body your body is a gift from God. What you put into your body what you put into your body is because of your relationship with your body and your God. I don't have that right. Government does not have that right. They want you to believe they have that right. And, unfortunately, you know, they've been successful.

I respectfully disagree and move to adopt this. DEI is unconstitutional as it violates the US Constitution's protection clause, along with Title VI and Title VII regarding race. This is modeled after a similar prohibition on state funds, which was adopted by the entire appropriations committee last session. I respectfully request the adoption of this rider.

There is a debate about implementing a vaccine mandate, but the speakers have different opinions. Speaker 0 is against it, while Speaker 1 believes it cannot be enforced. Speaker 2 thinks it is proportionate, but Speaker 3 emphasizes the need to increase vaccine willingness without mandating it. Speaker 4 mentions the right to refuse vaccination and the government's promise against a mandate. Speaker 2 reiterates that there will be no vaccine mandate, and Speaker 0 insists on the need for one. However, Speaker 2 clarifies that not using the vaccine won't result in losing basic rights. They believe a solution leading to a vaccine mandate will be found.

The vaccine is back in the news as Republican leaders in Brevard County are set to call for an immediate ban on mRNA-based COVID vaccines. The Brevard GOP executive committee believes these vaccines are a biological weapon. They are expected to vote on a letter requesting state leaders to make it illegal to administer or receive mRNA vaccines in Florida. The letter, which includes citations, outlines their reasoning and is likely to pass during the upcoming vote.

The Surgeon General of Florida, Dr. Joseph Laudipo, has called for a halt to the use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines due to concerns about DNA integration with the human genome. He argues that the vaccines contain DNA that hangs on with the mRNA and enters cells, which is a problem because each dose likely contains billions of DNA fragments. The FDA's own guidelines state that testing should be done to ensure foreign DNA does not integrate into the human genome, but the FDA has not provided a clear answer on whether they have conducted such tests. Dr. Laudipo finds it concerning that something as precious as human DNA is not being treated with more care.

The committee is currently distracted from discussing meaningful improvements to Americans' health care. Instead, it is revisiting established science on vaccines and the role of the federal government in providing affordable health care. There is a clear stance among Democrats on the finance committee regarding lowering costs and enhancing care, but the same clarity cannot be applied to the nominee present.

According to Speaker 0, Article Two of the Constitution vests executive power in the President, meaning the President defines the executive branch. Speaker 0 believes the proposed amendment violates the separation of powers and Article Two because it implies a federal court could define or limit the duties of individuals within the President's executive office. Speaker 1 asks if the bill codifies Article Two to remind the court of its limitations, and if the amendment would undo that. Speaker 0 confirms this interpretation. Speaker 1 suggests that without such a bill, a president would have to answer claims in multiple places across 50 states, potentially using nonofficial funds. Speaker 0 agrees, citing the use of courts for "nefarious purposes" since 2017 and the weaponization of "lawfare" against President Trump, arguing the president alone defines the duties of personnel within the executive office.

Speaker 1 questions the authority of Speaker 0 to nullify the Bill of Rights by issuing an order that restricts religious gatherings. Speaker 0 explains that the decision was based on data and science to prevent the spread of the virus. Speaker 1 acknowledges the ongoing debate but emphasizes the violation of the Bill of Rights. Speaker 0 asserts their broad authority within the state and the coordination with religious leaders. Speaker 1 insists that the Constitution prohibits such actions. Speaker 0 mentions consulting attorneys and provides an example of discussing concerns with Cardinal Tobin regarding drive-thru Holy Communion. Speaker 1 concludes that the government cannot dictate worship practices.

Laura Logan hosts a discussion with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny on vaccines, public health policy, and what they see as failures and harms within the system. The conversation weaves together personal history, policy details, scientific debates, and broader social concerns, intercut with promotional content for GiveSendGo. Key points and claims raised by Dr. Tenpenny - Vaccine ingredients and aluminum exposure: Tenpenny asserts that if someone receives every vaccine on the schedule, they would be injected with a total of about twelve thousand micrograms of aluminum, which she says is inflammatory to every organ system and can be stored in bones (60% of aluminum exposure). She notes aluminum is present in vaccines in order to replace mercury, which she describes as also a poison. - Early vaccine industry liability and the 1986 Act: The discussion explains that prior to 1986 there were liability concerns for vaccine makers due to injury lawsuits. Tenpenny recounts that in 1986 Congress passed a law giving the pharmaceutical industry liability immunity for vaccines, creating what she describes as a ramp in the vaccine schedule. She cites that by 1991 additional vaccines were introduced (Hep B at birth, Hib, chickenpox, Prevnar, Gardasil, Hep A, and more) and alleges this resulted in a rising autism incidence aligned with new vaccines. - The vaccine injury system: Tenpenny explains the Injury Compensation Act and the existence of VAERS as a tracking system, along with a separate pathway created under the PREP Act (the Preparedness and Readiness Act). She states that during the COVID era a separate program, the Covered Countermeasure Program (CICP), existed under the PREP Act, but it had no funding and a one-year statute of limitations, leading to under-compensation and very few adjudicated cases; she contrasts this with the earlier 1986 act, which funded vaccine injury compensation through the Federal Court of Claims and VAERS. - Perceived safety and effectiveness concerns: The speakers discuss studies suggesting that the flu shot might not prevent flu and that some studies indicate vaccines including pneumonia vaccines may be associated with higher risk of the conditions they aim to prevent. Tenpenny frames this as evidence of cracks in the vaccine program and argues that vaccines are linked to a broad spectrum of health issues, including autoimmune diseases, infertility, and cancers, which she says have been increasing. - Pediatric vaccination schedule and “pediatric poisoning program”: Tenpenny asserts that infants receive multiple injections early in life, with claims that by age two they will have thousands of micrograms of aluminum and other compounds that remain in the body, including in the brain. She characterizes the pediatric schedule as a systematic poisoning program for children and a parallel “adult assault program” for adults receiving vaccines. - COVID-19 vaccine controversy and health impacts: The conversation covers the COVID vaccines, including assertions about adverse effects such as myocarditis, strokes, kidney injury, autoimmune diseases, neurological issues, and cancers. Tenpenny describes long-term concerns (long COVID, autoimmune diseases) and claims of widespread injury and death, contending that the pandemic revealed how the health-care and pharmaceutical systems operate, including alleged corruption and profit motives. She discusses the difficult experiences of families during the pandemic, including restrictions on care and the use of alternate treatments like ivermectin in some cases. - The claim that COVID vaccines were not properly evaluated and that mandated vaccination reflected coercion: The speakers discuss mandates and the experiences of individuals in workplaces and educational institutions who faced pressure to receive vaccines, including religious exemptions and disputes about mandates. Tenpenny suggests a broader pattern of overreach in public health policy and questions about the balance between individual rights and mandates. - History and philosophy of public health programs: They discuss the Healthy People initiatives, arguing that the program’s goals have expanded in scope (from 15 goals to 1,200 for Healthy People 2030) and that the expansion is associated with greater surveillance and control over personal lives. Tenpenny claims that this is part of a broader trend toward data collection and governance of individual health and behavior. - The economics and incentives around vaccines: The conversation notes how physicians are compensated in part through vaccine administration, implying financial incentives influence clinical decisions. Tenpenny emphasizes the profit motive behind vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry’s financial interests, citing extreme examples like the one boy in a photo who allegedly became heavily medicated due to vaccines. - The role of media and information control: They discuss the influence of advertising in media since the 1990s and the difficulty of reporting critically on vaccines when major advertisers are pharmaceutical companies. They also mention AI and misinformation concerns, including examples of AI fabricating sources and the need to verify information. - Personal stakes, accountability, and political possibilities: Tenpenny discusses personal cost for challenging the vaccine paradigm, including an earlier period of potential licensing scrutiny and professional pushback. She names figures such as Fauci and Birx, argues that accountability has not yet occurred, and expresses hope that public interest in accountability could shift through advocacy and political leadership, citing RFK Jr. as a potential ally though acknowledging political and institutional obstacles. - Treatment and detoxification approaches: For those who have already received vaccines, Tenpenny outlines two separate tracks: detoxification for childhood vaccines and detox for COVID vaccines. For detox, she mentions products such as PureBody Extra (PBX), a zeolite-based supplement she says helps remove metals like aluminum and mercury from the body. She notes it is usable across age groups and even for pets, and she personally uses it. She also discusses non-specific detox approaches such as vitamin D optimization, lymphatic stimulation, exercise, and a diet focusing on avoiding white foods and reducing inflammation. She cautions that there is no proven blood or urine test to quantify spike protein after a COVID vaccine, and that detox strategies aim to support overall health rather than remove embedded spike protein from tissues. - The role of faith and resilience: The interview includes discussions of faith as a guiding force for Tenpenny, including her personal journey toward Christian faith in 2020. They reflect on fear, hope, forgiveness, and the idea that one can act with integrity and do the right thing even when faced with controversy or personal cost. They discuss existential questions about meaning, purpose, and moral responsibility, including the belief that life has a spiritual dimension that informs how to respond to public-health challenges. - Community and parenting: The conversation emphasizes the importance of community networks for new parents, including seeking mentorship from experienced parents and trusted health advocates, and maintaining parental agency in decisions about vaccines, medical interventions, and child-rearing. They discuss the value of critical thinking, asking questions, and avoiding blind trust in professionals or institutions. - Closing notes and resources: Tenpenny provides her websites and a Substack for ongoing information, including dr10penny.com, dr10penny.substack.com, and 10pennywalkwithgod.substack.com, as well as her X profile busy doctor t. The episode closes with a call to viewers to stay informed and to seek second opinions, while thanking the audience for supporting independent journalism. Overall, the dialogue centers on a critical, conspiratorial framing of vaccines, public-health policy, and the medical establishment; it weaves together testimonies about personal experience, policy history (notably the 1986 Act and the PREP Act), alleged systemic failures in compensation for vaccine injuries, criticisms of COVID-19 responses and vaccine mandates, and practical detoxification and faith-based guidance. The promotional content for GiveSendGo lightly interrupts the core discussion, but the majority of the exchange remains an extended argument about vaccine safety, accountability, and the perceived influence of big pharma on health care and public policy.

The speaker questions whether OSHA has the authority to mandate vaccinations for 84 million Americans. Speaker 1 mentions that the Supreme Court has ruled on the matter. Speaker 0 criticizes Speaker 1 as an unelected bureaucrat, stating they cannot force people to take an experimental vaccine or show their papers. Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of attempting to fire 84 million workers and asks if they believe the court was wrong. Speaker 1 acknowledges that the court's decision is final. Speaker 0 quotes Speaker 1's statement to Reuters, where they express disappointment with the ruling but state that they will continue to encourage employers to implement safety measures.

Florida Surgeon General Dr. Ladipo is recommending that people stop getting the COVID vaccine due to safety concerns. He states that billions of DNA fragments were discovered per dose in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines. He claims that these concerns have not been addressed by the FDA or CDC. Dr. Ladipo says that if the risks of DNA integration with COVID vaccines cannot be addressed, then the vaccines aren't appropriate for use in humans. He sent letters to the heads of the FDA and the CDC questioning how this would impact humans in three areas: healthy human genes being transformed into cancerous cells, chromosomal instability, and how the integration could affect unintended parts of the body such as the heart, brain, lungs, and the injection site. A local doctor, Michael Sparks, says health providers are stuck in the middle with the state surgeon general saying one thing and the FDA saying another.

The video features a discussion about the requirement of vaccines for employees in healthcare facilities. The speaker questions whether employees should be forced to get vaccinated and highlights concerns about exemptions for religious or medical reasons. The speaker argues that if the employer has the final say on exemptions, they could easily reject them, rendering them meaningless. The issue of employer liability for adverse reactions is also raised, with the speaker suggesting that employers should be held responsible. Another speaker adds that some hospitals are making employees sign consent forms stating they won't sue if they have adverse reactions. The video concludes with a comment expressing skepticism towards the Texas Medical Association.

The dialogue centers on the FDA’s decision to limit access to COVID-19 boosters to people 65 and older or those at high risk, and the rationale behind that stance. The first speaker notes surprise at the FDA announcement, which they interpret as restricting individual choice by narrowing booster eligibility. They ask for clarification on why the decision was made and why boosters might no longer be available to those who believe they would help. The second speaker explains there has been no randomized controlled trial for four to five years, so the appropriate number of boosters for a healthy American is unknown. They pose questions: should booster frequency be like the two-dose pattern of the MMR vaccine, like the two or three doses for HPV or hepatitis B, or could it be as high as 80 boosters over a healthy person’s lifespan? They state that the theory of a repeated booster strategy for healthy individuals lacks supporting data. Their job, they say, is to require clinical trial data before approving a COVID vaccine for younger, healthy Americans, noting this population differs from five years ago due to ubiquitous population-based immunity, a different circulating virus, and a vaccine formulation that introduces a new protein in the body. They ask whether it makes sense to “blindly rubber stamp” a vaccine that creates a new protein every year for the rest of a person’s life, implying skepticism about perpetual annual vaccination for the next century. Consequently, they published a framework in The New England Journal of Medicine for “sensible COVID vaccine booster regulation in The United States” that uses an age-stratified approach and positions the U.S. as “catching up with the rest of the world.” They claim part of the motivation is alignment with international practices: the UK recommends boosters for those 60, 75 and high risk, and France for 80 and high risk. They argue against pushing boosters on healthy six-year-old girls annually without evidence. They reference the framework’s reception from vaccine manufacturers, noting they issued positive statements because they like predictability.

The speaker discusses the issue of voter fraud in Texas and how it cannot be prosecuted due to a court ruling. They explain that local district attorneys are not prosecuting voter fraud cases, so the attorney general took on the responsibility. However, the Court of Criminal Appeals deemed it unconstitutional for the attorney general to be involved in court cases. This means that voter fraud is no longer being prosecuted. The speaker expresses concern about the lack of defense against voter fraud and mentions attempts to pass a law to reauthorize prosecution, but it was not prioritized by the Texas House. They emphasize the importance of addressing voter fraud as it impacts the election of the right people.

A member raises a point of order regarding the statement made about vaccine passports. The statement suggests that full vaccination will be required for entry into venues with large crowds, including nightclubs. The member expresses concern that this could also apply to the House of Commons, preventing MPs from representing their constituents without undergoing a medical procedure. The Speaker assures that there is currently no indication that this policy applies to the House, and members have the right to attend unless otherwise stated. The government has not been in touch regarding this matter. The Speaker does not expect the policy to apply to members.

Florida is sending a letter to nurses and doctors regarding informed consent for COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. The letter informs patients that the vaccines are for the wrong variant and are dangerous, citing prolonged spike protein circulation, respiratory infection risk, and autoimmune disease risk. The Florida Surgeon General recommends against mRNA vaccine use and advises nurses and doctors to recommend against the vaccine. The speaker expresses happiness about this and anticipates other states will follow suit, except for "blue" states.