reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The Senate leaders are heading to Kyiv with $61 billion, possibly in cash, while our border is being invaded by 800,000 illegal immigrants in the last month. They had no time or money to address the border issue, but managed to prepare the money, load the planes, and get ready for their trip to Kyiv.

The speaker opposes sending defense articles and services from the US to Ukraine, arguing that they should be used to defend the US border instead. They claim that veterans in their district prefer fighting against Mexican cartels at the southern border rather than supporting Ukraine. They criticize the Secretary of State for prioritizing Ukraine and accuse the Biden administration of depleting US military readiness. The speaker also expresses concern about China's growing strength and accuses the government of lying about the need to support Ukraine to prevent China from invading Taiwan.

The speaker proposes an amendment to stop funding Ukraine, claiming that the US has taken over the country and is fighting a proxy war without public approval. They argue that the US is providing extensive financial assistance, military equipment, and weapons to Ukraine, totaling $113 billion in 2022 alone. The speaker criticizes the state and foreign operations bill for granting Ukraine a blank check, allowing the State Department to bypass oversight. They express concern that this funding will perpetuate endless war and bring the conflict to American soil. The speaker cites polling data showing that a majority of Americans oppose further funding for Ukraine and believe the US has already done enough. They argue that taxpayer dollars should be used to secure the US southern border and combat issues like human trafficking. The speaker urges the adoption of their amendment.

Trump says the administration removed wasteful items from the budget, which upset Congresswoman Ocasio Cortez and the socialist wing of the Democratic Party. They took out items that existed under President Biden and are demanding they be put back in. Examples cited include: $3,000,000 for circumcision and vasectomies in Zambia; $500,000 of American taxpayer money for electric buses in Rwanda; $3,600,000 for pastry cooking classes and dance focus groups for male prostitutes in Haiti. I kid you not. $6,000,000 for media organizations for the Palestinians; $833,000 for transgender people in Nepal; $300,000 for a pride parade in Lesotho; $882,000 for social media and mentorship in Serbia; $4,200,000; $4,200,000 for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex people in the Western Balkans and Uganda. The congresswoman and the socialist wing threaten to shut down the government till we get this back in. The fight is about putting this back in the bill.

This is a Democrat trap that would end a Republican's career. It's a foolish bill that should not be signed. It involves massive amounts of money, billions and billions of dollars, going out of town. The situation at the border is extremely bad, one of the worst I've seen. Overall, this bill is one of the dumbest I've ever seen.

Since Biden took office, the U.S. has spent $100 billion in an undeclared war against Russia, primarily funding Ukraine with $75 billion. Despite claims of Ukrainian victories, many believe Ukraine cannot win against Russia's superior resources. Most Americans oppose further funding, yet Congress continues to push for more aid. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson plans to prioritize a $60 billion aid package for Ukraine, despite a lack of support from Republican voters. Critics argue that this funding diverts attention from pressing domestic issues, like illegal immigration and national debt. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene emphasizes the disconnect between lawmakers and their constituents, urging Americans to hold their government accountable and prioritize domestic needs over foreign wars.

The speaker expresses concern about the potential consequences of allowing Vladimir Putin to prevail in Ukraine, suggesting it could embolden China to make a move on Taiwan. They emphasize the need for transparency and accountability in how money is spent and advocate for auditing the funds already sent to Ukraine. The speaker asserts the importance of standing with Israel as a key ally in the Middle East. They hope that military intervention can be avoided but highlight the legislative branch's authority in approving such actions. The speaker also discusses the threats faced by Israel and expresses confidence in Prime Minister Netanyahu's determination to protect the country. They highlight the connection between Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, Russia, and China, referring to it as a new axis of evil. The speaker concludes by affirming the House's support for Israel.

The negotiation for Ukraine funding did not include a path to citizenship, which has been a failed strategy for the Democrats for 30 years. The focus should be on helping undocumented Americans in the country, but the old tactics from 2013 are no longer relevant.

Speaker 0 expressed gratitude for the attendees and mentioned a meeting with President Zelensky, emphasizing support against Putin's invasion. They requested a clear strategy and detailed answers from the White House regarding Ukraine. Criticizing the Biden administration, they highlighted the need for oversight and a coherent plan before allocating additional funds. The speaker then shifted focus to national security, specifically the border crisis. They highlighted the high number of illegal crossings, the presence of terrorists, and the alarming amount of fentanyl entering the country. The speaker stressed the urgency of addressing these issues and reiterated the need for clarity and oversight in spending taxpayer dollars.

Congress released a 1,012-page bill with a $1 trillion price tag full of questionable spending. Examples include $850,000 for a gay senior citizen home in Boston, $15 million for Egyptian college tuition, and $400,000 for a group teaching elementary school kids about being trans. Even a posthumous earmark for Dianne Feinstein. The bill also includes $500,000 for an anti-racist nature program at the San Diego Zoo. This bill, signed by Biden, will spend taxpayer money recklessly.

We don't have any extra money to send to Ukraine, considering our massive deficit of over $1.5 trillion. Borrowing money from China to support Ukraine doesn't make sense. We don't have a rainy day fund with trillions of dollars just sitting around. Instead, we would have to borrow the money, which leads to inflation. Since Russia's war in Ukraine began, American taxpayers have already provided $113 billion to Ukraine. We have many issues in our own country that need attention before we borrow more money to fuel a war in another nation.

- The speakers criticize a new funding bill as a bloated, bipartisan package totaling over $1.7 trillion, arguing it represents a “middle finger” to American taxpayers and funds more than merely keeping the lights on. They claim both parties supported it, eliminating any real fiscal fight. - They highlight a provision referred to as health care extenders on page 772, noting that temporary pandemic expansions in health and welfare programs are now baked in as permanent costs for taxpayers. This is presented as evidence that eligibility expansions for Medicare are being locked in. - They point to Israel-related spending buried within the bill, noting provisions allocating hundreds of millions of dollars for Israeli missile defense programs, including the Iron Dome, on page 101 of the 1,059-page bill. They argue that funding the U.S. government is linked to funding a foreign defense system, and that this represents corporate welfare for well-connected interests in Washington. - The discussion asserts that Ukraine-related funding is not explicitly in the bill as written, but that money may still be funneled through contractors or other channels. They question whether there will be a final victory lap on supposedly winding down Ukraine aid, suggesting money remains flowing covertly. - They discuss the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and USAID, noting that money for NED remained in the bill despite amendments to cut funding. They describe NED as a non-partisan tool that has supported regime-change activities, including actions in Iran and Venezuela, and criticize both parties for preserving this funding. - They critique the consolidation of aid into the State Department, specifically via USAID under Marco Rubio, arguing that oversight has weakened and that funding is redirected for various foreign policy aims (e.g., Venezuela, Cuba, Iran). They discuss the influence of Rubio on where funds go and describe the arrangement as increasing executive-led control with limited transparency. - They argue that the bill reflects a broader pattern of government spending: a so-called “uni-party” consensus that avoids reducing government size, with both parties acting in lockstep on foreign and domestic priorities. - The conversation touches on public opinion, citing a Gallup poll that suggests younger generations despise both major parties, and they link this to perceived bipartisan over-spending and interventionism. - Throughout, the viewers criticize what they see as a routine of declaring emergencies and then normalizing permanent programs, suggesting that emergency measures become permanent and that the political system uses crisis rhetoric to justify ongoing expenditure. - The discussion ends with remarks on political leadership, labeling Speaker Johnson as a weak figure and coining a proposed “fuck it party” as a first-principles anti-war alternative, with participants noting they would join or support it. Daniel McAdams provided expert commentary throughout.

The American people should be proud of their support for Ukraine. We will continue supplying Ukraine with critical weapons and equipment, including $200 million that I just approved. However, without additional funding, our ability to help Ukraine respond to urgent demands is coming to an end. We need Ukraine to fix its broken immigration system, and Congress needs to do the same at home. Holding Ukraine funding hostage to push a partisan agenda on the border is not the solution. We need real solutions.

The speaker questions the unconditional financial support given to Ukraine and emphasizes the need for a plan and payment for any future aid. They also mention diverting funds from Israel's arms budget. The speaker then asks if the government will be shut down and suggests that the Republican party should focus on shutting down the border as a message.

Speaker 1 describes four months of arduous negotiations to produce a bipartisan bill, noting there were many times negotiations derailed and that he stayed on the phone at midnight to keep them moving. He argues the bill is crucial and a turning point for America, outlining the stakes across several flashpoints. First, he asserts that if the U.S. does not aid Ukraine, Putin will walk over Ukraine, the war could be lost, and the U.S. could find itself fighting in Eastern Europe as a NATO ally in a few years, a scenario Americans would not like. Second, he says if the U.S. does not help Israel defend itself against Hamas, the perpetual war will continue. Third, he claims humanitarian aid to starving Palestinians in Gaza is essential to prevent hundreds of thousands from starving. Fourth, he mentions the border crisis, referencing statements from Speaker Johnson that it is chaos, and asserts legislative action is needed. Speaker 1 credits Mitch McConnell for his contributions, but contrasts him with others, including Speaker Johnson, who he says are "scared to death of Donald Trump." He contends Trump has called for chaos and suggested that if he becomes president, Ukraine could be gone, the border could worsen, and war in the Middle East could escalate. He argues Trump’s stance is political rather than policy-driven and asserts that the majority of Republican senators recognize the bill as the right thing to do. He emphasizes the bill as a compromise—describing it as something he does not like in full, nor does McConnell, but necessary to accomplish important outcomes in the Senate. He recalls bipartisan legislation from two years prior as proof such collaboration is possible. The core question he poses is whether senators will drown out the political noise from Trump and his allies and do the right thing for America. Speaker 1 frames the bill as a turning point in American policy and history, asking whether history will look back and see that they rose to the occasion. He asserts that the majority of Republican senators understand the bill’s necessity, despite political headwinds, and he casts passage as essential to addressing Ukraine, Israel, Gaza humanitarian needs, and border stability. Speaker 1 ends by reiterating that history is watching their decisions at this moment.

The speaker criticizes a bill that prioritizes Ukraine over America, arguing that it neglects pressing issues such as border security and rising costs for American families. They express frustration with the lack of debate and amendment opportunities in the Senate, emphasizing the need for individual members to have more influence. The speaker also highlights the Biden administration's actions that have contributed to the current border crisis, including reversing Trump-era policies and not enforcing immigration laws. They criticize the administration's energy policy and its impact on US relations with Russia. The speaker concludes by expressing concerns about the allocation of foreign aid and the neglect of American priorities.

The negotiation for Ukraine funding did not include a path to citizenship, which has been a failed strategy for the Democrats for 30 years. This strategy has not delivered for the undocumented Americans in the country.

The speaker criticizes the act of withholding Ukraine funding to push a partisan agenda on the border, stating that it is not the right approach. They emphasize the need for genuine solutions.

President Biden is facing backlash from Republicans and former Democrat Senator Kyrsten Sinema over allegations of stealing $105 million from Arizona. Sinema had previously held up Biden's inflation bills, concerned about excessive spending and its impact on inflation. In exchange for her support, she secured $100 million to strengthen the border in Arizona. However, Senate leader Chuck Schumer and House leader Hakeem Jeffries redirected the funds to New York, allegedly to support illegal immigrants residing in posh hotels with meals, cell phones, and other amenities. While conspiracy theories suggest this is a strategy to gain Democratic voters, the documented fact remains that Biden approved the diversion of funds from the border crisis to improve conditions for illegal immigrants in New York.

Speaker 1 emphasizes the importance of a bipartisan bill that has been negotiated for four months. They highlight the significance of aiding Ukraine to prevent Putin from taking over, supporting Israel against Hamas, providing humanitarian aid to Palestinians in Gaza, and addressing the chaos at the border. Speaker 1 praises Mitch McConnell for his efforts but criticizes Republicans, including Speaker Johnson, for being afraid of Donald Trump. They argue that many Republican senators know the bill is necessary but are hesitant due to political reasons. Speaker 1 urges senators to prioritize the well-being of America over political noise and emphasizes that history is watching their actions.

Earlier today, military officers were warned about the potential consequences of unresolved issues on Capitol Hill. It was emphasized that if Republicans in the Senate do not show seriousness in finalizing a national security agreement, Vladimir Putin could take advantage and advance through Ukraine and Europe. Both parties acknowledge the importance of aiding Ukraine and resisting Putin for national security. However, Republicans are holding up progress due to unrealistic demands on border security. Democrats are willing to find a compromise, but if Republicans continue to insist on Donald Trump's border policies, they will be responsible for the failure of agreements on aid to Ukraine, Israel, and humanitarian aid to Gaza. It is crucial for Republicans to show willingness to moderate and reach a reasonable bipartisan compromise.

The Senate advanced a spending bill that allocates $35 million to the Department of Energy for preparing for and responding to potential nuclear and radiological incidents in Ukraine. This bill brings the total US expenditure on Ukraine, including war-related aid, government funding, and energy assistance, to $67 billion. This $67 billion is more than Russia's entire military budget from last year. Congress is expected to fully pass the bill later this week.

Since Joe Biden became president, the US government has spent billions of dollars on an undeclared war against Russia without explaining its purpose or benefits. The war has resulted in Ukraine receiving billions of dollars in aid, but it has not been successful in ending the conflict. Ukraine is unable to defeat Russia, and the rest of the world is aware of this. However, US media continues to falsely claim that Ukraine is winning. Republican leaders like Mitch McConnell are pushing for more funding to Ukraine, despite opposition from the majority of American voters. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene criticizes the funding, highlighting the country's own issues and the lack of support from the American people.

President Biden is considering implementing strict border policies, similar to those used by former President Trump, in order to persuade Republican lawmakers to provide more military aid to Ukraine. This marks a significant shift in immigration policies, as it reflects concerns over the record number of migrants crossing the southern border and the strain it has placed on federal and local resources. Democratic-led cities like New York and Chicago have struggled to accommodate the influx of newcomers, leading to concerns from local officials. The motive behind Biden's change in stance is seen as a tactic to secure GOP support for aid to Ukraine.