reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Christopher Leland suggested that Canada should prepare a substantial retaliation list in response to potential tariffs from Donald Trump, proposing a figure of $200 billion as a starting point for consultation. She emphasized the need for immediate action, arguing that American politicians prioritize their own interests over Canadian concerns. Leland expressed a desire for American workers, like Wisconsin dairy farmers and Michigan manufacturers, to recognize the impact of tariffs on their businesses. She noted that Canada has unique economic leverage over the U.S. Despite her points, the discussion highlighted skepticism about her understanding of the situation and a call for a change in Canadian leadership, asserting that current politicians do not represent true Canadian interests. The speaker urged Canadians to prioritize their families and future generations.

Enhancing the Chinese economy may have long-term consequences for us. It is crucial to minimize our investment and gradually reduce our dependence on Chinese trade. However, finding the right approach to achieve this is challenging.

We must acknowledge President Trump's repeated desire for Canada to become the 51st state. None of us want to be caught unprepared, failing to defend Canada or collaborate with our democratic allies to safeguard our borders. They are willing to cooperate with us. It is imperative that we take immediate action domestically, connect with them, and establish a new global order that protects democracy and Canadian sovereignty.

Canadians are preparing for war with the U.S., a fact many Americans remain unaware of. I recently spoke with well-connected individuals in D.C. who were shocked to hear this. Prime Minister Trudeau's recent comments, caught on a hot mic, confirmed the seriousness of the situation. The threat is real; jokes about a U.S. invasion are not funny. Canadians are actively boycotting the U.S. and seeking alternative business partners. British Columbia, a province larger than most U.S. states, is canceling U.S. government contracts. Other provinces are following suit. My video on this topic has 80,000 views, yet I've received no American comments. The lack of awareness in the U.S. is deeply concerning; Americans need to understand the imminent threat of war.

America is currently consumed by a cultural fever, but Canada will remain committed to its core values. As the United States battles against woke culture, we in Canada will continue to prioritize and champion inclusiveness.

Economic force because Canada and The United States, that would really be something. You get rid of that artificially drawn line and you take a look at what that looks like, and it would also be much better for national security. Don't forget, we basically protect Canada. The United States and Canada may become one simplifying border controls, or Canada might keep its hydropower causing energy problem in The US. Now we all know that Trump wants to take Canada and Greenland. These points frame a possible future relationship between the United States, Canada, and Greenland, touching on security, energy, and border policy.

There are some places that are never for sale, like Buckingham Palace. Canada is not for sale and won't ever be, but there is opportunity in partnership and what can be built together. This includes security. The Canadian government is committed to a step change in investment in Canadian security. The President has revitalized international security and NATO. Canada is stepping up military participation.

The speaker questions the common narrative that Trump is an idiot and suggests a counterintuitive plan: what if losing the war in Iran is the point, aimed at accelerating the collapse of the American empire and the global economy, in order to rebuild power for the United States? Key claims and sequence: - The media portrays Trump as destroying America, waging an unwinnable war in Iran, threatening to invade with ground troops, angering NATO by threatening Greenland, and clashing with multiple countries; JPMorgan warns the world will run out of oil by mid-April; the global economy is described as on the brink of collapse; Trump is labeled as the worst president or a buffoon—yet this could be intentional. - The hypothetical strategy: what if Trump wants to lose the war in Iran to cause a broader decline of the American empire and the global economy, thereby gaining a strategic genius status. - Oil dependence highlights: currently, the world relies heavily on Middle East oil for major regions (20% of the world, 75% for Japan, 60% for Europe, etc.). Oil is not scarce worldwide; major reserves exist in Venezuela, Canada, and the United States. - Claim that Trump “took over Venezuela in January” and has threatened to take over Canada, implying moves toward controlling North American resources. - If Iran conflict closes the Strait of Hormuz, Middle East oil would be cut off, while North American production continues; thus Europe, China, Japan, and South Korea would become dependent on American oil and fertilizer (nitrogen for food) from the U.S./North American region. - Consequence: nations that hold U.S. debt—Japan, China, Taiwan, South Korea, Europe (UK, France, Belgium, Luxembourg)—need Middle East oil and now need American energy and resources; they cannot abandon the dollar due to this energy dependence. - The claim that Trump has transformed America’s debt into a potential weapon by forcing global dependence on North American energy, rather than allowing a debt-driven collapse. - Parallel to Russia: Putin’s Ukraine strategy is cited as proof that a war footing can restructure an economy around defense production (drones, munitions, military manufacturing); Russia moved from importing Iranian drones to making them domestically and exporting to Iran. - The proposed “Greater North America” concept: Greenland for rare earth minerals, Canada for oil and resources, Venezuela for oil reserves, Mexico for manufacturing, Panama Canal for trade control. The idea is to build a self-sufficient North American fortress while the rest of the world burns. - Outcome framing: Trump may appear reckless, but if the objective is to end the American empire’s current form and rebuild it for Americans by making the world dependent on U.S. resources, he could be remembered as a transformative, potentially greatest American president in history. - Closing: the “new world order” is deemed dead, replaced by a “Trump world order,” with a prompt to follow for more content.

Donald Trump's tariffs could severely impact Canada's economy, potentially leading to a significant rise in unemployment. With 60% of Canada's international trade linked to the U.S., these tariffs threaten to price Canadian goods out of the American market. The increase in apprehensions of individuals on terrorist watch lists at the Canada-U.S. border has prompted these tariffs, highlighting concerns over Canada's immigration policies. The current government is seen as ineffective, with ongoing issues like open borders contributing to the crisis. Despite calls for economic negotiation, Canada lacks the strength to effectively respond. The situation is precarious, and the future looks uncertain as the government struggles to maintain power amidst these challenges.

You are imposing tariffs on regular Americans, and we will respond. Canada is a crucial market for U.S. exporters, larger than China, Japan, the UK, and France combined. The anger in Canada is palpable, with the entire country rallying behind Prime Minister Trudeau. The tariffs are higher than those against China, which feels like a betrayal to a loyal ally. The justification regarding fentanyl and border security is flimsy, as only a tiny fraction of fentanyl comes from Canada. Canadians are proud of their sovereignty and will retaliate against these unjustified measures. The relationship between our countries has historically been beneficial, and we want to maintain that partnership. The current situation is seen as self-harm for America, and Canadians are uniting in support of their government.

Canada, with a population of 41 million, holds vast resources, including crucial energy and water. Recently, Canadians have expressed interest in the potential for an economic union with the U.S., which could enhance trade and security against external threats from countries like China and Russia. This union could involve a shared currency, unified tax systems, and streamlined travel, similar to the EU. However, many Canadians are hesitant about the current government, particularly Trudeau, leading negotiations for this deal. As a result, there's a desire for new leadership to initiate discussions on this promising opportunity.

In a discussion with Glenn (Speaker 0) and Professor Jeffrey Sachs (Speaker 1), the speakers analyze the current Iran war in the context of a shifting world order. Sachs argues that two things are unfolding simultaneously: the erratic behavior of the United States (personalized in Donald Trump) and the broader question of American hegemony, alongside battlefield realities that challenge the claims of “shock and awe” and irreversible American victory. Key points raised: - The US, under Trump, exhibits “brazenness, lawlessness, the viciousness” in rhetoric and actions, including a statement about sending Iran back to the stone age. Netanyahu’s speech is described as equally shocking, with Netanyahu portraying himself in a biblical, godlike framing and extending “10 plagues” to Iran. - On the battlefield, the idea that American power guarantees victory is questioned. Counterattacks in Israel and the Gulf region have occurred, downing American jets and showing Iranian retaliatory capability and waning missile defense. This challenges the notion that US military supremacy is unassailable. - Sachs notes a stark contrast in public opinion: in the United States, there is widespread opposition to the war; in Israel, the public appears to largely support the war and the associated violence. - He characterizes the conflict as one driven by a “war of whim” with unclear aims, and asserts that the claimed U.S. “shock and awe” does not align with the observed battlefield and morale realities. - Beyond Iraq/Iran, Sachs discusses broader structural factors: American hegemony is pursued as a policy objective but often unfulfillable; the military-industrial complex and figures like Trump contribute to the propulsion of war; personal traits of leaders (described as psychologically unstable by some forensic psychiatrists) influence decision-making. - A possible path toward de-escalation, according to Sachs, hinges on dialogue among global peers. He suggests that Trump listens to leaders he regards as peers (Putin, Xi, Modi) and that these leaders need to tell him to stop, though he remains skeptical whether this would be sufficient. - Sachs emphasizes a multipolar world as the reality: countries should avoid hosting US bases, which he argues undermine sovereignty and security. He advocates neighbors engaging with one another, cooperation with major powers (China, Russia, India), and reducing dependence on the United States. - He critiques Western and European reliance on US leadership, noting that Europe’s internal politics still echo imperial mindsets and that NATO’s expansion and anti-Russia policies have complicated security. He argues that European and Gulf leaders often pursue “peace through strength” rather than genuine diplomacy. - Specific regional advice includes: be wary of US hegemonic guarantees; avoid dividing lines that empower a hegemon; pursue regional engagement (GCC-Iran dialogue) and view China, Russia, and India as potential partners rather than adversaries; understand that technologies (AI, data centers, chips) are not substitutes for credible security. Towards the end, Sachs reiterates that the current approach is producing insecurity and economic crisis, urging readers to adjust to a multipolar reality and to seek regional cooperation over reliance on US dominance. He closes by expressing the hope that governments will embrace reason and adapt to current realities.

President Trump mentioned expanding the U.S. footprint, and it started when Trudeau said that evening out the trade relationship would mean Canada would cease to exist as a country. The President responded that if Canada can't exist without cheating in trade, then it should become a state. Canada is our friend and partner, but for decades, the U.S. allowed uneven trade imbalances. During the Cold War, we wanted countries to be strong economically, even if they were cheating. But these are rich, developed economies now. Whatever they charge us, we should charge them. If they don't allow American companies to operate, we shouldn't allow their companies here. American banks can't even operate in Canada. There has to be reciprocity and fairness. The days where countries take advantage of us have to end because it's not good for the global order and creates friction. This is the case with Canada and other allies.

Speaker 0 argues that we are in an era of great power rivalry and a fading rules-based order, where the strong can impose their will and the weak suffer consequences. He cites Vaclav Havel’s The Power of the Powerless, using the greengrocer example to show how systems endure through ordinary people performing a shared illusion of legitimacy. The implication is that removing the sign in the window reveals the fragility of such a system, and that countries and companies must do the same. He notes that for decades Canada benefited from the rules-based international order, joining its institutions and enjoying predictability that supported values-based foreign policy. Yet the fiction of universal mutual benefit and evenly applied international law persisted only because of selective enforcement and American hegemony, which provided public goods like open sea lanes, a stable financial system, and dispute-resolution frameworks. That bargain no longer works, and the world is in rupture rather than gradual transition. Crises in finance, health, energy, and geopolitics have exposed risks of extreme global integration, and great powers are now using economic integration as weapons—tariffs, financial coercion, and coercive supply chains. Multilateral institutions—the WTO, UN, COP, and related architectural frameworks—are under threat, prompting middle powers to seek greater strategic autonomy in energy, food, critical minerals, finance, and supply chains. A world of fortresses would be poorer, more fragile, and less sustainable. If great powers abandon pretense of rules and pursue power unrestrained, transactional gains become harder to replicate, and allies will diversify to hedge against uncertainty, rebuilding sovereignty based on resilience rather than rules. Collective investments in resilience and shared standards can reduce fragmentation. The question for middle powers, including Canada, is whether to build higher walls or pursue a more ambitious path. Canada has shifted toward value-based realism: principled commitments to sovereignty, territorial integrity, UN Charter norms, and human rights, coupled with pragmatic recognition that progress is incremental and not every partner shares all values. Canada is engaging broadly, strategically, with open eyes, calibrating relationships to reflect values, and prioritizing broad engagement to maximize influence amid global fluidity and risk. Canada has cut taxes, removed interprovincial trade barriers, fast-tracked a trillion-dollar investment program in energy and critical minerals, doubled defense spending, and diversified abroad. It has a comprehensive strategic partnership with the EU, joined SAFE, signed 12 trade and security deals across six continents, and formed partnerships with China and Qatar while negotiating FTAs with India, ASEAN, Thailand, the Philippines, and Mercosur. Canada pursues variable geometry—coalitions for different issues based on common values and interests—and acts as a core member of the Ukraine coalition, supports Arctic sovereignty with Greenland and Denmark, remains committed to NATO’s Article Five, and invests in northern and western defenses. In plurilateral trade, Canada seeks to bridge the TPP and EU, and to form buyers’ clubs for critical minerals anchored in the G7, aiming to diversify away from concentrated supply. On AI, Canada cooperates with like-minded democracies to avoid choosing between hegemons and hyperscalers. This is not naive multilateralism but building effective coalitions issue by issue with partners who share sufficient common ground. The overarching message is to name reality, apply consistent standards to allies and rivals, build institutions that function as described, and reduce leverage that enables coercion by strengthening domestic economies and diversifying internationally. Canada’s path is to stop pretending, build strength at home, and act together with others willing to join.

Tariffs are being imposed without justification, as only about 0.2% of fentanyl entering the U.S. comes from Canada. If border security were truly the concern, it could be easily addressed. Canada is also affected by the smuggling of U.S. guns that lead to violence in Canadian cities, and both countries could collaborate to manage asylum seekers. The recent threat to Canadian sovereignty, suggesting Canada could become the 51st state to avoid tariffs, has angered Canadians. They value their national pride and sovereignty, and any aggressive actions will be met with a strong response. Canada wants to maintain a friendly partnership with the U.S. while standing firm on its identity.

Canada needs a change in leadership, as the current situation is dire. The capital flight and decline in GDP per capita over the past eight and a half years are attributed to Trudeau's policies. His actions have severely harmed the country, and recovery will take decades. It's crucial for him to step down, as even his own party is urging him to leave. The focus now should be on fixing the country and moving forward.

Speaker: I have a message for the Canadian people. Don't vote for this guy. Real and Mark Carney is the most elite of elitists out there. This guy is not a man of the people at all. He's the ultimate elitist, and be careful because he put out a message, and he conflated, you know, hey, Trump is the biggest threat to we've had, you know, in his lifetime. Thinking about all the things that have threatened humankind in in his lifetime. So it's hyperbolic. But then he started bragging about the economy, you know, the liberal economy. I have all these charts. Mean, it's just and they're all heartbreaking if you're a Canadian. The standard of living has imploded. You look at the investments, right, or where the jobs are. Almost all of it, public sector, little private sector, and self employment, none. There's no real business opportunities there. OECD predicts the worst economies for 2020 to 2030 at the end of all 36 countries, Canada. I mean, careful. You're right. You've got to right. It's not bad. It's horrific. It's horrific. This country needs a reboot, right? Which means Canada's vulnerable. It's extraordinarily vulnerable. They're to a major power like America taking them on. Sure. They I mean and we're friends. Again, this is reciprocal. This is like, hey. Okay. You wanna protect your dairy farmers and they for whatever reason, they supersede everyone else? Negotiate with the Trump team. But this sort of saber rattling but I will say this. They do have a friend in the American media. And my emails this morning, get one from Fortune, and it says America's war in Canada. We didn't declare war. The article, you can't find that anywhere in the article, but that's where they headline it. Maybe it makes you open an email, but again, this is the kind of stuff that's happening out there. It's really it's really this is a heartfelt message to to Canada and and and people up there. It's time to turn your country around. I don't know. Time to make Canada great again.

Tariffs are taxes on imported goods, and the U.S. only imports 15% of its goods and services. Canada and Mexico contribute just 5% of that. This trade war could significantly impact their economies, as Canada relies on the U.S. for 20% of its GDP, with 75% of its trade tied to the U.S. If prices rise, Americans may stop buying Canadian goods, hurting their economy. Mexico is similarly vulnerable, with 40% of its GDP linked to U.S. exports. Concerns about Canada cutting off power are unfounded, as they are in significant debt. Other countries contribute only 10% to the U.S. GDP, and tariffs can be beneficial when paired with tax cuts. While there may be slight inflation, it will be manageable. America is prioritizing its interests, so there's no need for alarm.

The conversation centers on the idea of a closer economic union between Canada and the U.S. amid concerns about sovereignty. One participant expresses dissatisfaction with the current Canadian government and advocates for direct negotiations with Trump, believing that tariffs are not the solution. They propose ideas like a common currency and no tariffs, emphasizing that Canadians would benefit from access to the U.S. market. The discussion touches on the potential for a new passport system allowing free movement between the two countries, while also addressing concerns about cultural preservation and economic independence. The dialogue concludes with a focus on the importance of communication and exploring opportunities for economic collaboration.

The current situation stems from Justin Trudeau's actions, particularly his recent comments regarding Kamala Harris. His approach has strained relationships during crucial trade negotiations with the new administration. Any failures in this regard are directly attributed to him, and there is a desire for a reset once he is no longer in office. Efforts are being made to repair and build relationships that should have been established over the past four years. Maintaining good relations with both Democrats and Republicans is essential for effective diplomacy, and expressing a preference for one party over another undermines that effort. Ultimately, the responsibility for the damaged relationship lies squarely with Trudeau.