reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Cutting taxes and spending is the solution. Eliminating agencies like the IRS, CIA, and FBI may seem drastic, but pre-9/11 intelligence failures demonstrate bureaucratic inefficiency, not a lack of funding. Increased spending hasn't solved the problem; intelligent interpretation of information is key. Expanding presidential power is concerning; sacrificing liberty for security leads to the loss of both. The push for national ID cards, warrantless searches, and secret prisons is un-American. We must use presidential power to restore order and protect our liberties.

The speaker argues that the nation is heading toward a civil war due to irreconcilable political and ideological divides that are deepening. They claim the Democratic Party is becoming more radical and that every current issue hinges on illegal immigration. Specific points raised include the belief that Democrats want to spend a trillion dollars on healthcare, push for a census to counsel for congressional racism, and advocate electoral changes or mass deportations in cities like Portland, Chicago, and Los Angeles. According to the speaker, without illegal aliens or foreign entities in the country, Democrats cannot assemble votes, despite loving democracy, because the mathematical reality doesn’t work for them. The speaker notes contemporaneous political tensions, including a Supreme Court decision and redistricting fights, comparing those fights to “kids in this chat room.” They assert that with enough urgency and a maximal strategy, the 21 would already be on the table and a plan would be executed, but that the establishment resists because it wants to remain part of the established order. They claim this dynamic has persisted for forty to fifty years, and that although Republicans have won control of the House, Senate, and presidency at times, the country remains “on a cliff of an abyss.” They credit Trump with preventing the country from collapsing, suggesting that without him “the country be over.” The speaker predicts worsening partisan conflict, citing perceived left-wing escalation and examples like a Kansas dynamic where people are “thrown under the bus” and treated as unworthy of forgiveness. They describe the left as moving up an escalatory ladder, and refer to Mondami as a “Marxist jihadist” who might win by roughly 15 points. In New York City, they reference Sadiq Khan and describe everything the left has as more radical than anticipated, asserting a widening chasm and a lack of meaningful debate. Regarding strategy, the speaker criticizes the Trump administration, including Pam Bondi, for not moving quickly enough. They acknowledge a recent Oval Office discussion about stopping street violence as positive but insist the focus must be on the deep state: taking the administrative apparatus, leveraging a short window of time, prioritizing and expanding hires for U.S. attorneys, and ensuring arrests translate into durable outcomes. Without this, they warn, good arrests will be undermined by future waves of bad actors returning. The call is to maximize strategy, seize institutions, and act with urgency.

This is truly an "America First" policy, fulfilling a long-standing public demand. Politicians have promised smaller, more efficient government for years, but only Donald Trump, with Elon Musk's help, is delivering on that promise with unprecedented speed. While some disruption is expected, the public desires action. Republicans will likely support this aggressive government audit, including a review of the Pentagon. The goal isn't to weaken the military, but to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse. Finding inefficiencies and redirecting funds to crucial areas will enhance national security, not compromise it. The American people want this, and it's achievable.

To address the issues at the FBI, simply firing Christopher Wray is not enough. The entire system needs to be dismantled. Although there are risks involved, it is better to cut too much than not enough. Reform alone won't make a difference. The speaker greatly admires Donald Trump but believes it is necessary to bring about change. They compare it to rolling over a log and seeing the creatures in the swamp. The speaker wants to use pesticide to eliminate the problem. They acknowledge the importance of understanding the situation and highlight the need to hold the FBI accountable for their actions. The speaker suggests moving the frontline officers to other agencies while shutting down the FBI's back office bureaucracy.

The discussion centers on whether a deep state or nefarious forces are maneuvering against President Trump, and whether Trump is being restricted by a gatekeeping inner circle that blocks information. Laura Logan is cited as saying, based on her sources in the intel community, that Trump is being set up to fail and there will be no coming back if he doesn’t act, a claim they discuss with urgency and detail. Key points raised: - There is a concern about how information reaches Trump, with examples cited such as the New York Times reporting on a person removing briefing papers from the president’s desk, described as an act of treason and sedition, and discussions of withholding information from him by intelligence agencies. - An “asteroid belt” around Trump’s inner circle is described as blocking entry for others who might report to him, with gatekeepers preventing action and limiting accountability. - The lack of action within the administration is presented as a major concern, with questions about personnel in critical departments. Specific issues include unfilled ambassadorial and deputy positions across the State, Defense, and other departments, and the presence of loyalists to the prior administration. - Names and potential targets of concern are discussed, though the speaker emphasizes not knowing all the names or proving definitively. Todd Blanche is repeatedly mentioned as a name that comes up in intel tracking, and there are claims about Maria? (likely Susie Wiles) and Susie Wiles as gatekeepers; Noel Frisch’s reporting on Susie Wiles is referenced; Sergio Gore is noted as removed from White House personnel and now ambassador to India; Scavino is mentioned as involved in personnel matters. - The conversation highlights the roles of various actors: Rubio’s connections to Cuba are discussed in the context of broader foreign influence; comparisons are drawn between actors connected to Cuba, the CCP, and Chevron, suggesting influence operations. - The Trump administration is accused of having eight deputy positions in intelligence and defense occupied by people not loyal to Trump, with similar loyalties issues in the DOJ and other departments; cited examples include the delay in implementing executive orders and foreign policy reforms, such as rewriting the foreign service manual and a supposed ninety-day review of foreign assistance. - There is skepticism about the ability to replace or reform agencies like TSA and FEMA while personnel are acting or non-loyal; concerns about ambassadors who resigned on day one still remaining in place are voiced. - The impeachment discussion centers on the belief that Trump will be impeached if Republicans lose the House or Senate, with claims that impeachment would hinge on charges like failure to hold people accountable; the claim is made that there has been extensive investigation into Russia collusion and January 6, and that treason and sedition have been carried out by others, which should prompt accountability but currently do not. - The broader political strategy is described as ongoing information warfare, with allegations that those in power would use impeachment or punitive measures against Trump supporters, while those currently in power have allegedly violated constitutional duties, including border policy and redress of grievances. - They reference the Seditious Six and assert that those individuals are encouraging military disobedience; the argument is that accountability is needed, and if not, those who supported Trump may feel betrayed. - Laura Logan promotes her forthcoming episode of Going Rogue, inviting viewers to see receipts and evidence, and thanks the host,予 noting Christmas wishes and closing remarks.

Today's CIA has become politicized and weaponized, posing a threat to America. Trump, wary of the intelligence community after being spied on, chose to fund his own transition team. Former CIA officials express a belief that the government exists to serve itself rather than the people, reflecting a troubling mindset within the agency. The top 20% of the CIA is described as malignant narcissists, while the majority are seen as patriotic but constrained by leadership. Fixing the CIA requires significant personnel changes, as current leaders are entrenched in a culture that prioritizes their agenda over serving the public. Effective oversight and the inclusion of experienced, conservative voices are crucial for reforming the agency and ensuring it fulfills its intended purpose of national defense.

I plan to dismantle the deep state and reclaim our democracy from corruption. First, I will reissue my 2020 executive order to remove rogue bureaucrats aggressively. Next, we will overhaul corrupt national security and intelligence agencies to prevent targeting of conservatives and others. We will reform FISA courts to address judicial negligence in warrant applications. A truth and reconciliation commission will expose deep state abuses by declassifying relevant documents. We will crack down on government leakers and make inspector general offices independent from their departments. I will ask Congress to establish an independent auditing system for intelligence agencies. Additionally, I will relocate parts of the federal bureaucracy outside Washington and ban federal bureaucrats from taking jobs with the companies they regulate. Lastly, I will push for term limits for Congress members to ensure government accountability.

A former Secret Service agent, Richard Staropoli, warned that Donald Trump could face a significant attack before his inauguration, potentially more severe than previous assassination attempts. He expressed low confidence in the current Secret Service's ability to protect Trump, citing a decline in effectiveness compared to the past. Staropoli criticized recent testimony as a smokescreen for the agency's shortcomings and emphasized the need for a return to basic security measures. He predicted a serious threat could emerge before inauguration day, indicating that the current security measures are inadequate. The discussion highlighted concerns over the Secret Service's competence and the need for a complete overhaul to ensure the safety of high-profile leaders.

I want key positions in the federal government, like the Office of Personnel Management and the Office of Management and Budget, filled by individuals who share my anti-government, anti-bureaucratic mindset. The Trump experience taught me that appointing those aligned with the managerial class is a mistake. I aim to cut 75% of the federal bureaucracy and need to identify the top 25% of performers to retain. We're developing a comprehensive screening process to select for excellence based on psychological assessments, knowledge, and work ethic. Additionally, I recognize the importance of acting quickly in the first year, focusing on executive actions rather than legislative agendas, and starting preparations before the election.

If the January 6th committee is legitimate, then members of Congress cannot evade accountability for crimes like destroying evidence. If Donald Trump wins the presidency, there should be a thorough investigation into those in Congress who may have participated in corrupt activities. We need to identify who suppressed evidence and whether there was malicious intent, as these actions are crimes regardless of congressional status. True accountability requires defeating the deep state, and electing Trump is the first step. We must inform Americans about issues like the 51 intel letter, Hunter Biden's laptop, and Joe Biden's classified documents. These matters will converge, leading to significant upheaval in Washington, where the deep state will face consequences for its actions, ushering in a new era of accountability.

Trump has proposed a 10-point plan to dismantle the deep state and restore democracy. Key points include: 1. Reissuing his 2020 executive order to remove rogue bureaucrats. 2. Overhauling corrupt national security and intelligence agencies to prevent targeting of political opponents. 3. Reforming FISA courts to address issues with misleading warrant applications. 4. Establishing a truth and reconciliation commission to declassify documents on deep state abuses. 5. Cracking down on government leakers collaborating with the media. 6. Making inspector general offices independent from their departments. 7. Creating an independent auditing system for intelligence agencies. 8. Relocating federal positions outside Washington to areas with patriotic citizens. 9. Banning federal bureaucrats from taking jobs with companies they regulate. 10. Pushing for a constitutional amendment to impose term limits on Congress members. This plan aims to restore government accountability and control by the people.

The DOJ and FBI must report to congressional committees, with strong leadership from Republicans to enforce valid subpoenas. This requires a coordinated effort, similar to how Russiagate was addressed, involving multiple agencies like DOD, CIA, NSA, and others. The American public supported Donald Trump, and a collective approach is essential moving forward. Regarding Senate confirmations, the traditional process allows presidential candidates to present their cabinet as a package in early January. This has been done by previous presidents, including Joe Biden. The goal is to ensure Trump receives the same opportunity without creating unnecessary obstacles, emphasizing the need for uniform application of the Constitution in Washington, D.C., as the public desires.

The recent assassination attempts on Trump raise serious questions. The first involved a shooter with no apparent motive, advanced skills, and no online presence. Secret Service failures are glaring, particularly the lack of surveillance on a nearby rooftop. A second attempt, weeks later at a golf course, involved an assailant with an AK-47 and body armor. These incidents, barely covered by the mainstream media, suggest a potential conspiracy. The lack of investigation into these attempts, and the continued lack of security around Trump, is deeply concerning. Trump’s reaction to these events, demonstrating resilience and a continued focus on his duties, is remarkable. His calm demeanor and focus, especially during his recent inauguration, show a change in him since the attempts. The incidents highlight a worrying lack of accountability within the government.

At the Tampa Summit, Bannon urges 'two or three action steps by Sunday afternoon' to appoint a special prosecutor to 'assist and augment president Trump' and save his presidency. He asks, 'Who governs this country? The American people or the deep state?' and calls for Tampa resolves. He backs Tom Fenton as prosecutor, 'not a lawyer' but able to 'hire all the lawyers,' to 'unseal all the sealed evidence' and 'collect all the other evidence' from every agency. The second mandate would 'impanel a federal criminal grand jury' to examine 'the intelligence agencies and the interconnectivity with foreign governments, whether it's British government and MI six, the Saudi government and Saudi intelligence, Mossad and Shin Ben and the Israeli government and the CIA.' He cites 'the crimes against children' and 'the trafficking of children.' Congress must confirm; Matt Gaetz suggested. If not, 'the country will be over.'

Following Trump's significant victory in the 2024 election, General Flynn issued a stark warning about potential threats to Trump’s safety and the necessity for immediate action against entrenched officials from the previous administration. He emphasized the importance of appointing loyal and capable individuals to key positions to prevent sabotage. Flynn expressed concern over ongoing plots against Trump, suggesting that if Trump had lost, he would have faced severe repercussions. He identified John Brennan as a key adversary and stressed the need for heightened security around Trump. Flynn called for a reform of government departments and urged vigilance against the ongoing threats posed by those opposed to conservatism. The discussion concluded with a reminder to stay alert and informed about the actions of political adversaries.

We need to prioritize the fight against human trafficking, especially involving children. It's crucial to target criminal gangs and terrorists who exploit this issue, as well as the NGOs and faith-based organizations that may be complicit. We have a clear understanding of these organizations and their operations, and we must dismantle them to protect vulnerable populations. The focus should be on immediate actions, such as a deportation campaign and addressing the alarming number of missing children. Trump must communicate his plans for day one in office, emphasizing safety and security, reforming health care, and eliminating unnecessary regulations. This approach will unify the public and expose those responsible for the ongoing crisis. We have a significant opportunity to hold accountable those who have contributed to this situation, and we must act decisively to restore order and integrity.

After the first 100 days of Trump's second administration, more will be accomplished than in any previous administration. Trump is focused on righting the ship, improving the economy, securing the border, and ensuring safety. He has learned from past experiences and assembled a qualified team ready to serve the country. The media plays a crucial role in either dividing or uniting the nation, and it's essential to cover stories that accurately reflect America. There is a significant influx of illegal immigrants, and the current administration's actions have created security concerns, including potential threats to Trump. Given the circumstances, moving the inauguration indoors was a prudent decision.

John Ratcliffe is heading to the CIA, and his experience as a former federal prosecutor and congressman makes him a strong choice. He has previously exposed issues within the FBI and DOJ, advocating for accountability in Washington. There's a need for leadership changes in the Department of Defense, which has faced criticism for its handling of recent conflicts and has not passed a budget audit in 16 years. The FBI's political biases have been highlighted, especially regarding their actions during Russiagate and the treatment of Trump associates. There's a call for a return to a fair justice system, emphasizing that if Trump is successful, he can reform these institutions to fulfill their intended roles.

The transcript centers on a long-form discussion of the Epstein case, the alleged “deep state,” FOIA operations, and political maneuvering around Trump, with frequent calls to aggressively release and pursue Epstein-related documents and other investigations. The speakers assert that the FOIA department is being used to shield deep-state ties and that many federal offices are filled with anti-Trump figures who have prevented full disclosure. - Epstein files and the role of the deep state - The speakers claim the Epstein files are being selectively redacted by FOIA departments to conceal deep-state connections. They state that FOIA personnel are controlled by deep-state actors and that Epstein’s case involves a “fleet of aircraft” and operations linked to major power centers. They argue Epstein’s activities connect to money laundering, information laundering, and a broader set of deep-state assets and operations. - They propose a remedy: appoint Tom Fitton as special counsel on the Epstein files, arguing he “knows how FOIA really works,” understands key personnel, and has litigated Epstein-related cases for years. They assert this would restore public confidence and expedite the exposure of Democratic ties and other actors alleged to be involved. - They advocate for Trump to have executive-privilege-style powers to declassify and release Epstein materials, suggesting a broad interpretation of “Epstein file law” that would allow him to disclose or appoint an ombudsman with power to release materials at will. They emphasize the need to disclose Democratic ties and to hold press conferences when releasing documents, avoiding the use of fake documents or videos. - Specific figures and institutions named - Kash Patel is cited as saying there are “open files on a dozen plus coconspirators” and as someone who has noted alleged misdirections by those handling Epstein-related material. - Kyle Serafin and Phil Kennedy are mentioned as documenting a person at the FBI capacity who is “an anti-Trump advocate,” implying that deep-state appointments control FOIA and related processes. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss replacing FOIA and related personnel who are deeply implicated; they specifically name Tom Fitton as the ideal choice and entertain other high-profile figures like Tulsi Gabbard as potential custodians of the Epstein disclosures. - Tulsi Gabbard is described as being in charge of broader investigations tied to the Epstein files and other major political issues (elections, COVID-19, etc.). They also reference “Epstein files” intersecting with other investigations they attribute to the deep state. - Epstein, Maxwell, and allied networks - Epstein is described as deeply embedded with Western intelligence agencies (French, Israeli, UK, and US) and tied to Robert Maxwell, with Maxwell’s daughter linked to Epstein. Epstein is portrayed as having been “recruited by Bill Barr” and as a central figure in a long-running intelligence and blackmail operation. - The discussion links Epstein to Leslie Wexner (Victoria’s Secret founder) and a French talent agency, portraying these connections as part of a large, interconnected network involved in money laundering, arms trafficking, blackmail, and intelligence work. - The speakers insist that Epstein’s activities extended to the late 1990s and beyond, including alleged involvement in “Shutters” in Santa Monica and other high-profile cases, with a consistent pattern of using underage girls and blackmail to exert influence. - They emphasize a broader motive: exposing the “deep state” to vindicate Trump and indict deep-state actors who allegedly engaged in illicit operations, including foreign intelligence services and Western governments. - The broader political frame and potential indictments - The Epstein files are presented as a potential hinge for indicting a wide array of figures across political lines, including references to Comey, Mueller, Hillary Clinton-era actors, and other “rogue actors” who allegedly hindered investigations. - The conversation ties Epstein to broader themes: the 2020 election, COVID policies, and anti-Trump actions by the “deep state.” They contend that the Epstein disclosures could demonstrate the depth of state interference in political processes and media, making Democrats and their institutions targets of accountability. - They argue the Epstien files could show criminal activity by multiple national actors, including Israeli, UK, and French components, and could reveal coordinated efforts to derail Trump and manipulate media narratives. - The Candace Owens angle and related criticisms - A substantial portion of the dialogue critiques Candace Owens, alleging she is running a “CIA-style” operation that distracts from the true conspiracy around the deep state and Tarantifa, and that she manipulates narratives related to Tyler Robinson and Charlie Kirk. - They accuse Owens of shifting narratives, fabricating alibis, and promoting disinformation, calling her a “SIOP” (psychological operation) and alleging her behind-the-scenes connections to MI6 or other international actors through her husband (George Farmer) and other associates. - They recount multiple incidents where Owens purportedly changed stories about meetings, alibis, and involvement in various investigations, asserting she uses “receipts” selectively and inconsistently to support divergent claims. - The speakers allege that Owens’s public warfare against Trump and TP USA is part of a broader intelligence operation intended to disrupt conservative momentum, link to Royal/MI6 circles, and undermine investigations into the deep state and its networks. - Tyler Robinson case and media dynamics - They describe Tyler Robinson as a Middle American figure whose transformation into a political actor is portrayed as a product of online radicalization and Tarantifa-linked influences. They claim there was a concerted effort to spoon-feed disinformation about Robinson and Candace Owens’ involvement. - They argue this is part of a larger pattern of media manipulation and disinformation designed to distract from real conspiracies and to target Trump and conservative movements. - Strategy and messaging guidance - The speakers advocate for Trump to go on the offensive with Epstein, releasing comprehensive, verified documentation, and pushing accountability for “rogue actors” in the FBI, the DOJ, the CIA, and the NSA. - They stress the need for aggressive prosecution and the appointment of trusted figures to lead the Epstein disclosures, arguing that this could restore public confidence and pivot the political conversation toward accountability for the deep state. - They urge addressing the statute of limitations issues in COVID, January 6, and 2020 election-related cases before the window closes in early 2026, warning that delays by Bondi, Blanche, and others could jeopardize prosecutions and political support. - Promotional and logistical notes - The dialogue includes frequent mentions of promoting Alex Jones programs, products, and stores (alexjonesstore.com and infowarsstore.com) to fund operations, along with appeals to listeners to support the broadcasts financially and through purchases, framing financial support as essential to sustaining investigations, media efforts, and broader political action. In sum, the transcript presents an entangled, aggressively conspiratorial narrative: a claim that Epstein’s files illuminate a vast, deeply embedded deep-state apparatus spanning multiple nations and agencies; a call to appoint trusted figures (notably Tom Fitton) to supervise full disclosure; a push for Trump to declassify and publicly prosecute the implicated actors; a harsh critique of Candace Owens as part of a disinformation ecosystem; and a broader strategy to use Epstein, along with related investigations, to dismantle perceived institutional corruption while fueling political narratives and fundraising.

In the first 100 days, expect a complete deregulation of American energy, leading to an energy boom and job growth. Regulations that increase costs and housing prices will be eliminated. The border will be secured, and criminal aliens will be deported, with foreign countries accepting gang and cartel members. Efforts will be made to restore peace globally, particularly in the Middle East and Europe. There will be historic tax relief passed in Congress, and the government will become accountable to the people. On day one, the administration will replace incompetent individuals with those dedicated to the American people, ushering in a new golden age.

According to the speaker, available evidence suggests Comer, Clapper, and Brennan lied to Trump and committed treason. The speaker recalls Devin Nunez briefing Trump in March 2017 about the Russia investigation being "bullshit," before Mueller was appointed. The speaker claims Paul Ryan and Mike Pence were disloyal and wanted Trump out, hoping he would step down after the "pussy tapes" emerged in 2016. The speaker believes Trump must decide who to hold accountable, asserting the President is the chief law enforcement officer. The speaker suggests Trump consult with his national security team and that Pam Bondi should immediately put Brennan, Clapper, and Comey under investigation, seize their communications, and investigate their classified activities. The speaker suggests that Jim Clapper should be brought in for questioning without a lawyer and predicts he will start "spilling his guts."

Trump's agenda includes energy independence, removing critical race theory from schools, celebrating the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, labeling cartels as terrorist organizations, and giving sex traffickers the death penalty. Disagreeing with these ideas solely because they come from Trump is seen as contributing to the country's decline. It is suggested that those who disagree should reevaluate their priorities.

The Secret Service director should be fired for allowing a suspect with a range finder near the White House. Local police are upset about being blamed for the security breach when it was the Secret Service's responsibility. Money should be reallocated from Ukraine to better protect elected officials. The lack of protection for the president is concerning, and the truth needs to be uncovered.

The speaker discusses being targeted for their knowledge and potential role in a second Trump administration. They suggest shutting down the Department of Education and reforming intelligence agencies like the FBI and CIA. They highlight the need to address deep state elements within the government. The speaker emphasizes the need for significant government reform to combat embedded bureaucratic influences.

Speaker 1 confirms he will continue to help Trump if he is selected. He refers to a potential "government efficiency commission" or "Department of Government Efficiency," possibly called "Doge." Speaker 1 states that at Twitter, they cut about 80% of staff and improved the site's features more in the past year and a half than in the previous eight years. Speaker 1 suggests reviewing all federal agencies to determine if all 428 are necessary, noting there are more agencies than years since the US was founded. He believes they should reduce the number of agencies and eliminate overlapping responsibilities. He also advocates for reviewing regulations to remove those that are not sensible, as regulators tend to add more regulations every year. He anticipates needing a significant security team due to potential unpopularity and threats.