reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Jackson Reffitt turned in his father, Guy Reffitt, to the FBI for participating in the January 6th insurrection. Guy is currently serving a 6.5-year sentence. Jackson expresses his fear and paranoia about potential pardons for January 6th defendants, especially regarding his father's release. He feels unsafe, having taken precautions like moving and arming himself. Despite loving his father, Jackson struggles with the division in his family, as his mother and sisters support Guy. He regrets reporting his father but felt it was necessary for safety. Jackson describes the emotional turmoil of being ostracized by his family and the fear of retaliation from those who support his father's actions.

My husband, a political prisoner, was taken by the FBI after our son reported him. He went to trial and received a seven-and-a-half-year sentence for being at the Capitol on January 6th. The government is weaponizing its power against American citizens, tearing families apart. I attend court hearings to witness the injustice and the precedents being set. They want to control us and criminalize our beliefs. We must resist and fight back. Our country is worth it. Our First Amendment rights are being taken away. My husband is serving time for exercising his right to protest. The government is using the January 6th events to target Trump and further their agenda. We stand outside the DC jail every night to support the patriots being held there.

My husband, a political prisoner, was taken in a pre-dawn raid and sentenced to seven and a half years in prison for his involvement in the events of January 6th, 2021. Our son, who had turned him in, was indoctrinated against us. The government has weaponized its power and is targeting American citizens. They are tearing families apart and labeling us as domestic terrorists. We must stay strong and vigilant. The government is criminalizing our forefathers' ideology and wants to weaken our nation. We must question their authority and obstruct their actions. Our country is worth fighting for. The mainstream media is not reporting on the trials, and the long-lasting consequences of these precedents will affect future generations. We must stand up and make our voices heard.

Jake Lang describes his experience surrounding January 6 and the aftermath of his detention. - Lang was never sentenced or found guilty of a crime, yet he spent four years and six days in prison. He says the Biden administration canceled the constitution, and asserts the FBI had embedded 274 agents to rile up a peaceful protest into a domestic extreme event to harm President Trump’s 2024 run. - He claims the event was staged to be used against Trump, and that the domestic terrorism frame and Patriot Act were used to suspend constitutional rights, with trials repeatedly kicked off. - Lang states that many detainees, including himself, spent years in solitary confinement without access to bond, having no criminal record. He contrasts this with cashless bail reforms in D.C., Chicago, and New York, where "career criminals" with numerous arrests were released quickly. - He says he was never afforded the same level of justice as those individuals, describing his time as a gulag and saying he prayed and kept faith during incarceration. He was released after 1,467 days to his fiancé Rachel, his father, and thousands of supporters outside the DC gulag. - To cope, Lang joined activities such as push-ups and reading the Bible; he hosted a political prisoner podcast with the Gateway Pundit featuring guests like General Flynn and Dinesh D’Souza, and occasionally appeared on Newsmax to share his story. - He maintained faith that whatever a judge—referred to as “wicked activist judges in DC”—decides would not be his fate, believing a higher plan was in store. - Lang is now running for the U.S. Senate in Florida to take Marco Rubio’s seat. He references a lawsuit alleging that Christopher Wray lied before a congressional panel about having knowledge of undercover agents at the Capitol on January 6; he claims Kash Patel indicated there were 274 agents, an overreach of normal procedures. - He states that the lie led to destroyed families, home raids, gunpoint confrontations, and fear nationwide. He notes red dot gun sights, long periods away from family, and visible dehumanization, including a photo of him with a beard and ponytail during imprisonment. - Lang points to the perceived double standard of justice, noting a Doge staffer who appeared with Elon Musk received a light punishment for assault, while Jan Sixers faced harsher consequences. He closes by highlighting efforts to rebuild lives for Jan Sixers through j6rebuild.com, urging support for those affected. Notes: Lang mentions ongoing activities, his Senate campaign, and calls for support for those impacted by January 6.

We lack control over the FBI as we don't control the White House. Releasing the January 6 tapes, which I support, may lead to the identification of individuals involved. However, this also means that the Department of Justice will pursue more people. I don't want anyone to suffer like Matthew Perna or Brandon's family. John, I don't want you to go to jail. I don't want this to happen to anyone else due to sick individuals who use facial recognition software to target others. It's overwhelming and needs to stop.

On February 25, 2022, Matthew Lawrence Perna tragically took his own life after facing immense despair. He had entered the Capitol building on January 6, believing he was standing up for free speech. However, he was falsely portrayed as a violent domestic terrorist, which led to the destruction of his reputation, business, and personal life. Despite turning himself in, he faced betrayal from the justice system, with false promises and a sentencing enhancement of terrorism. Matt's death highlights the devastating consequences of the unjust treatment faced by those involved in the events of January 6. His family seeks justice and support for the Matthew Lawrence Perna Act of 2022, which aims to prevent such overreach of power in the future.

It's a week before Christmas, and my son has been incarcerated for 1,432 days, having been through 14 different prisons as a political prisoner. I visit him every Wednesday, enduring a long trip for just an hour together. I empathize with all January 6 families during these tough times. We hope President Trump will release all January 6 prisoners and commute their sentences, ending this political persecution by the Biden administration. My son is a hero who saved lives that day, and we want him and others to return home to their families as productive citizens. Merry Christmas to all January 6 families, and may the New Year bring hope for their release.

Speaker 0 highlights the aftermath of the January 6th violence at the Capitol, with over 1200 people charged and almost 900 convicted or pleading guilty. Trump, instead of labeling them criminals, refers to the insurrectionists as patriots and even promises to pardon them if he regains office. While Trump claims there was love on that day, the nation, including law enforcement, witnessed hate and violence. A Capitol police officer describes it as a medieval battle and expresses fear.

Joe Biden's Department of Justice has caused significant suffering, and justice feels delayed for many. I want to express my gratitude to President Trump for keeping his promise to pardon the January 6th defendants on his first day in office, despite pushback from some Republicans. This act will alleviate a lot of pain and is a crucial first step toward healing and justice for those whose lives have been devastated by the actions of the current administration.

Jackson Reffitt turned in his father, Guy Reffitt, to the FBI for his role in the January 6th insurrection. Guy is currently serving a 6.5-year sentence. Jackson expresses fear and paranoia about potential pardons for January 6th defendants, including his father. He feels unsafe and has taken precautions, including moving and arming himself. The situation has fractured his family, with his mother and sisters supporting his father. Jackson regrets his decision to inform authorities but feels it was necessary for safety. He loves his father but cannot feel safe around him or his supporters, who express anger towards Jackson for his actions. He grapples with the emotional toll of the situation while waiting for guidance from the DOJ.

More than 170 January 6 defendants are accused of using dangerous weapons against law enforcement, sending a message that politics may overshadow policing. Pardoning violent criminals could endanger communities and impact law enforcement morale. Many Capitol Police officers feel angry and upset, believing they did their job properly on that day, while the pardons suggest the actions of the defendants were acceptable. This issue extends beyond former President Trump; former President Biden also commuted the sentence of Leonard Peltier, who killed two FBI agents in 1975. This sends a troubling message to law enforcement, implying that the deaths of officers in the line of duty can be overlooked, which is deeply hurtful to the families of those agents.

The discussion centers on the dangers posed by pardoned January 6th insurrectionists and the implications for justice. Former prosecutor Brendan Beaulieu emphasizes concern for the victims, particularly police officers assaulted during the riots. He notes the troubling trend of erasing the history of January 6th, likening it to international examples of political repression. Beaulieu warns of a growing effort to legitimize political violence and suggests that local law enforcement will need to protect marginalized communities. He reflects on the shift in federal attitudes toward domestic extremism and acknowledges that the possibility of pardons loomed over the prosecution efforts. Ultimately, he commends the dedication of those who pursued justice despite the risks involved.

A security guard, who was protecting a doctor, is facing sentencing for his actions during the January 6th incident. Marjorie Taylor Greene wants the U.S. Attorney prosecuting the case impeached. The guard claims that he has not engaged in any violence or destruction. He finds it ironic that the government is withholding 45,000 hours of video footage, which he believes would exonerate him. Despite his requests, the footage has not been released. He questions who the real criminal is when the alleged criminal is asking for evidence to be revealed, but the government is hiding it.

Jackson Reffitt turned his father, Guy Reffitt, into the FBI for his role in the January 6 insurrection, and Guy is now serving a 6.5-year prison sentence. Jackson expresses fear and paranoia about potential pardons for January 6 defendants, including his father. He feels unsafe, having taken precautions like moving and arming himself. Despite his love for his father, Jackson feels alienated from his family, as his mother and sisters support Guy. He reflects on the division within his family caused by his father's actions and the influence of the Trump presidency. Jackson struggles with the consequences of reporting his father, feeling both guilt and fear for his safety amidst the ongoing tensions.

Matthew Perna attended the January 6th protest in Washington, D.C., motivated by doubts about the 2020 election. Known for his gentle nature, he never intended to incite violence. After turning himself in for nonviolent offenses, he faced unexpected harsh penalties from the government. Struggling under the weight of legal pressures and public scrutiny, Matthew's mental health deteriorated, leading to his tragic suicide in February 2022. His family felt the justice system had robbed him of hope and spirit. Matthew's death sparked community grief, with over 10,000 signing a guest book in his memory. The stigma surrounding January 6th continued to haunt his family, highlighting the deep divisions in society. Matthew's story reflects the profound impact of political strife on individual lives and the consequences of being caught in a polarized environment.

General Michael Flynn, a highly respected former general and intelligence officer, recounts a lifelong connection to the ocean and service to the country, describing his career as a path that led him to become the deputy and later national security adviser to President Trump. He frames his experience as a stark contrast between his duty and a perceived betrayal by the U.S. government and its institutions. Key points and sequence of events: - Early career and worldview - Flynn describes growing up near the ocean, surfing, and a commitment to service. He says he loves the country and entered the service to defend it. - He recalls facing what he calls the “worst enemy” in America after returning from service and becoming a target of accusations of treason and being called a Russian spy. - War, policy, and intelligence critique - Flynn discusses the costs and consequences of war, praising sacrifice but arguing that war is a failure of policy, diplomacy, and leadership. - He portrays war as a constant state driven by money within the military-industrial complex and questions the necessity and management of ongoing conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. - He recounts the moment of taking command of a battalion and witnessing a helicopter crash, describing the grim realities of war and the reaction of coalition forces. - Intelligence reform and career advancement - Flynn emphasizes reforms to intelligence in Afghanistan, referencing a 2010 report titled a blueprint for making intelligence relevant in Afghanistan, which he authored as a senior intel officer. - He explains his appointment to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the Senate confirmation process, highlighting the opposition from the existing intelligence establishment (SES) and the resistance within Washington. - He notes how his leadership and intelligence work were both celebrated by some allies and targeted by others who wanted to push him out. - Personal and family impact - Flynn’s wife, Laurie, is described as a stabilizing force; the couple recounts decades of marriage, raising a family, and the toll of public life on their private lives. - He discusses the stress and trauma inflicted on his family during investigations, including the impact on his son and grandchildren, and describes the emotional and financial burdens of legal battles. - Transition to politics and Trump - Flynn relates how his experience and reputation led him to work with Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign, where he became a trusted adviser and ally. - He recounts meeting with Trump in 2015, the several-month collaboration, and his view of Trump as someone who could fundamentally change U.S. policy away from endless wars. - He describes the 2016 presidential transition, his offer to be national security adviser, and the initial endorsement by Trump, followed by a White House shake-up. - National security adviser role and the Russia narrative - Flynn explains the circumstances around his appointment as national security adviser and the opposing views within the White House about Russia and sanctions. - He recounts briefing the president and key figures in foreign policy, and the subsequent disputes and accusations that led to his resignation beneath a cloud of controversy, including claims that he had lied about sanctions. - Investigations, FARA, and prosecutorial conduct - Flynn details the scrutiny around his contacts with Russian officials and later the Flynn Intel Group’s work in Turkey, explaining that he was accused of violating FARA for actions tied to a private businessman rather than government-directed activity. - He discusses the narrative of being accused of being a Russian or Turkish spy, the portrayal of his son as a target, and the role of Covington & Burling in his legal defense. - He charges that the government used off-the-books deals and pressured plea agreements to pressure him into pleading guilty, including allegations of a “deal” that would protect his son from prosecution. - The courtroom and legal process - Flynn describes the high-profile court hearings led by Judge Emmet Sullivan, who publicly accused him of treason, stirred dramatic tensions, and threatened prison time for lying to the FBI. - He recalls the shock of the judge’s behavior, the break in proceedings, and the eventual decision to delay sentencing as he faced immense legal and financial strain. - Sidney Powell, exculpatory evidence, and defense strategy - Flynn’s legal team changes: Covington & Burling is replaced by Sidney Powell, who uncovers conflicts of interest and unveils Brady material and exculpatory evidence that had not been disclosed. - Powell’s involvement is described as a turning point that allowed Flynn to challenge government misconduct and pursue the truth rather than simply accepting a guilty plea. - Public support, family resilience, and the pardon - Flynn and family describe a groundswell of support from ordinary Americans through letters, gifts, and fundraising, including a legal defense fund that helped sustain them through financial hardship. - They describe the eventual decision by President Trump to issue a pardon of innocence in November 2020 after the government moved to dismiss the case, noting that Flynn did not seek the pardon initially and that Sidney Powell advised against accepting a plea in order to secure full vindication. - Flynn reflects on how the pardon, while welcome, carried mixed feelings given the years of damage and public misunderstanding. - Reflections on power, governance, and the future - The narrative frames a broader critique of entrenched agencies, media influence, and political storytelling, alleging the intelligence and justice systems have been weaponized and corrupted by political agendas. - The speakers emphasize the importance of truth, resilience, faith in family, and public accountability, arguing that Flynn’s story should illuminate issues of governance, the integrity of institutions, and the need for reform to restore trust in the republic. - The closing messages stress ongoing commitment to fight for reconciliation and reform, with Flynn characterized as a persistent presence who, despite wounds, remains engaged in public life and the defense of the republic. Throughout, the speakers present Flynn as a figure who faced relentless pressure from political and bureaucratic forces, endured personal and family hardship, and ultimately sought redress and vindication through a combination of legal advocacy, public support, and a historic presidential pardon. The narrative centers on themes of duty, betrayal, reform, and perseverance in the face of systemic challenges.

A friend involved in the January 6th events has been in jail for hundreds of days without trial, raising concerns about due process. Footage shows police opening doors and guiding protesters, suggesting a lack of intent for insurrection. The idea of an armed insurrection without weapons is questioned, and misinformation about police deaths is discussed. There’s a recognition that government agents may have incited actions that day, complicating the narrative. While acknowledging the poor decisions made, there's a call for accountability and a push for the January 6th prisoners to receive trials. The conversation emphasizes the need for transparency and standing against injustices.

Speaker 0 describes a courtroom incident where the judge read a letter and later accused him of violence in the courtroom. He says he asked the judge who wrote the letter and claimed he cannot represent his father because he is not a licensed attorney. He counters that he has never heard of an attorney’s license and even contacted the licensing commissioner, who offers driver’s licenses, mortgage licenses, and real estate licenses but no license to practice law; when asked to produce a license to practice law, the judge grew angry and said nothing. He asks if the court is a court of record for the third time and the judge goes quiet; other attorneys stand nearby as if unsure what’s going on. He tells the judge he doesn’t want to talk to the attorneys because the judge is the one keeping his dad in jail, not the lawyers. He insists on a record of whether this is a court of record, and when he does so, the panic button is pressed and bailiffs drag him out of the courthouse. His father is brought in and told, “Russ, we’ll let you go if you promise not to do it again.” His father hadn’t seen him since age 10 and didn’t know he was present. After his father is released, he resolves to dedicate his life to combining that experience with his spiritual knowledge. Speaker 0 then asserts that the system is purely financial: they treat your body as a warehouse, file liens, and monetize it using the General Services Administration (GSA). He claims they file a bid bond, a performance bond, and a payment bond with standard forms 93, 94, and 95, and then make you pay commissary. He describes receiving a CID number, being placed in a trustee program, and doing work, with everything financed through what he calls their private system, the Court Registry Investment System. He states you pay for everything, including attorney’s fees and court costs. Regarding exits from court cases, he claims you can stop a case by sending an affidavit of questionnaire to the judge and attorneys and asking under penalty of perjury whether they have a financial interest in the case. If they answer yes, they must recuse themselves; if they answer no, you have perjured yourself, and the IRS will imprison you. This, he says, is how to stop court cases. Speaker 1 responds with astonishment and disbelief, noting that people are being “traded like cattle” in jail and humorously remarks about future nicknames, calling the speaker “my cousin Vinny.”

Axios reports that Trump's pardons related to January 6 were a last-minute decision, with Trump instructing his team to "release them all." Concerns arise over pardoning individuals convicted of violent acts during the Capitol attack. One congressman, who was present that day, acknowledges the lawbreaking but argues that many did not receive due process. He defends Trump's decisions, questioning why the media does not focus on those who were not pardoned. The discussion shifts to accountability, with the congressman asserting that if released individuals reoffend, it should not solely fall on Trump, just as Biden shouldn't be blamed for others' actions. The conversation highlights ongoing political divisions and differing perspectives on law enforcement and justice.

Jacob Chansley, often depicted as a dangerous conspiracy theorist, was sentenced to nearly four years in prison for his role in the January 6th Capitol insurrection. The circumstances of his entry into the Capitol remain disputed, but surveillance footage reveals that Capitol Police did not stop him. Instead, they appeared to assist him, guiding him through the building and even attempting to open locked doors. At least nine officers were in close proximity to Chansley, yet none intervened. Chansley seemed to perceive the Capitol Police as allies, as evidenced by a prayer he offered on the Senate floor thanking them. This contrasts sharply with the narrative surrounding his actions during the insurrection.

Speaker 0: It's been a few days since you issued that resignation. You’ve been called weak by the president of the United States. You’ve been called a traitor by Lindsey Graham. You’ve been called an anti-Semite by Mitch McConnell, among others. Now there are reports that you’re under a leak investigation potentially accusing you of a felony that could put you in jail even though you now are raising your two boys. You’ve remarried, but you’re their sole biological parent still here. I ask you now whether this was worth it. Speaker 1: I think it most certainly was, Megan. I mean, the attacks against me are to be expected. The ad hominems from people like Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham at this point are fairly laughable. They don’t wanna discuss the issues. I wanna discuss the issues. As for the leak allegations, I’m not concerned because I know I did nothing wrong. Of course, I am concerned because we’ve all seen the FBI and the full way of the government come down on individuals who speak out. So that has me a little bit concerned, but I know the truth and the facts are on my side. So I think the important issues to address are what’s at hand, why we’re at war, and how we get out of the state that we’re in right now. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Your boys have already lost one parent. I mean, the thought of this government for which you’ve been working and the government for which you’ve sacrificed so much, actually trying to put you in jail over an alleged leak after the number of leaks we’ve seen go unpunished over the past ten years is truly outrageous, Joe. I mean, does it anger you? How does it make you feel? Speaker 1: You, you know, it it does anger me, but it it’s all just to be expected. I I knew this was going to happen. I I know their playbook. I think we’re all very familiar with their playbook. So, actually, the fact that they’re leaking these allegations so so they have to leak the allegations of an FBI investigation. If there truly was an FBI investigation, and who knows, maybe there will be, there would be a process and procedure for that. They would actually formally come to me. And if they were still collecting information, they most certainly wouldn’t leak it. So the fact that the FBI, DOJ, or really probably just partisans are leaking this this so-called investigation against me at a time when I’m going on and publicly speaking out against the course the administration is on, to me, that tells me everything that I need to know. I feel very confident in what I’m doing right now. I think I have a mission, and I think it is to do everything I can to stop this war. So to me, I kinda view everything else as a sideshow, and I just wanna stay focused on the mission.

This account describes a deeply personal experience tied to the January 6 events and the author’s broader concerns about government overreach and the persecution of dissent. The speaker asserts that their journey is real and not abstract, detailing actions taken against them by federal authorities. Key points include: - The speaker was arrested by the FBI, placed in a cell, and branded a terrorist by their own government. - Their teenage son, who was sleeping in Los Angeles, was followed by TSA agents and placed on a watch list. - The speaker’s bank accounts were flagged, their reputation attacked, and they were effectively sentenced by a system that allegedly knew the accusations were false but did not correct them. - The speaker references recent media coverage to claim a shift in official acknowledgment: news reports allegedly confirm that there were hundreds of undercover FBI informants present on January 6, contradicting earlier statements that there were none, and even later statements suggesting only a few. - The speaker insists on recounting these events in their book, “Selective Persecution, the Legalization of American Fascism,” not as a pundit but as a witness, arguing that what happened to them could happen to anyone. The speaker emphasizes the breadth and seriousness of what they describe as state actions: targeting an individual with legal and reputational damage, coupled with surveillance and coercive measures affecting family members and financial standing. The narrative frames these experiences as part of a broader pattern of government behavior surrounding January 6, asserting that the claims are supported by new reporting about FBI informants on the scene. Overall, the account centers on personal testimony of alleged misconduct by federal authorities, the collateral impact on family members, and a broader claim about systemic abuse and misinformation surrounding January 6, framed within the author’s critique of American political dynamics as described in their book.

I walked out of the DC Gulag after four years and six days, now a free man thanks to President Trump’s pardon. We sincerely thank him for his support, but the fight isn’t over. Many of my comrades remain imprisoned due to unjust charges from the DOJ. Jeremy Brown, a Green Beret, and Edward Kelly, a former Marine and father, are still behind bars, along with others like Dominic Bach and Daniel Ball. The pardon did not cover all charges related to January 6. We urge the president to expand the pardon to include these unjust charges. God bless America.

Jackson Reffitt turned in his father, Guy Reffitt, to the FBI for his role in the January 6 insurrection. Guy is currently serving a 6.5-year sentence. Jackson expresses fear and paranoia about potential pardons for January 6 defendants, including his father. He feels unsafe due to his father's continued involvement with extremist groups and the support his family shows for him. Jackson reflects on the division within his family, acknowledging his love for his father but feeling that he cannot be around him or his supporters. He struggles with the consequences of his decision to report his father, feeling isolated and terrified by the reactions of those who support his father's actions.

Two men approach police officers at the second line. One discusses his recent release from jail and claims the government has misled the public about January 6th. He argues that while many law enforcement officers were injured, the narrative that protesters killed anyone is false; the deceased were all protesters, including Ashley Babbitt, shot by police. He highlights instances of police brutality and the lack of investigations into officers’ actions. He also mentions the presence of undercover agents, particularly Ray Epps, who allegedly incited the crowd. He criticizes the harsh sentences faced by January 6th participants compared to leniency shown to others in similar situations, calling for their pardons. He emphasizes the unfair treatment and suffering endured by those involved, urging for justice and accountability.