reSee.it - Related Video Feed

She's criticized US intelligence and promoted Russian propaganda. Debbie Wasserman Schultz referred to her as likely a Russian asset. Given our military backgrounds, what are your thoughts on her? I believe she's compromised. Her support for a brutal dictator in Syria raises concerns. Russian media has labeled her a Russian asset, which is alarming. The US intelligence community has noted her troubling relationships with adversaries. My concern is that she wouldn't pass a background check.

Some members of the media use their platforms to push their own personal lines, which is dangerous for our democracy.

When long-serving politicians become indifferent to honesty, decency, truth, and the rule of law, it negatively impacts politics. Their calls for inquiries often seem motivated by a desire to align with far-right agendas, which further undermines the integrity of political discourse.

When long-serving politicians treat honesty, decency, truth, and the rule of law casually, it negatively impacts politics. Their calls for inquiries often seem motivated by a desire to align with far-right agendas.

The political landscape has shifted dramatically, with conservatives now embracing the role of rebels against the system, while liberals advocate for censorship and regulation of free speech. This reversal is striking. One speaker mentions being investigated politically more than notorious figures, highlighting the aggressive tactics used against opponents, akin to actions seen in third-world countries. They discuss winning cases and the potential for political retaliation, with accusations flying about intentions to imprison rivals. Despite having the power to act against political adversaries, one speaker refrains from doing so, believing it would harm the country. The conversation underscores the current political climate's absurdities and the weaponization of investigations for political gain.

My colleagues are trying to undermine and defund the FBI because they are investigating Donald Trump. Attacking the FBI and independent journalists undermines our democracy. By attacking these institutions, they can violate the law without consequences. The credibility of the FBI is being eroded by those on the other side of the aisle, and this needs to stop.

The speaker states that the "Russian story" would be called a covert influence campaign if they were doing it. The speaker also claims they would be the last to say they've never tried a covert influence campaign.

Tulsi Gabbard is described as "doing a great job" in the speaker’s view, with an aside that includes the word "Whisk." The speaker notes that Gabbard "took a lot of heat two days ago because she went in at Pam's insistence," and that she "looked at votes that wanna be checked out from Georgia." The question is raised aloud: "They say, why is she doing it? Right, Pam? Why is she doing it?" The response given is that the reason is "Because Pam wanted her to do it." The speaker emphasizes the motive by stating, "And you know why? Because she's smart." The dialogue then references a belief that others suggested the action was tied to Gabbard’s position or stance, saying, "they said, well, this has to do her position. Has to do it's really not so, but her position has to do with international." The speaker counters that line of thinking by invoking a different narrative about international affairs and election interference. The speaker recalls the longstanding chorus that has claimed Russia, Russia, Russia has been meddling in elections, noting, "the same people that said that, they've been saying Russia, Russia, Russia has been screwing our elections." The speaker then contemplates the possibility that Russia "had something to do with it," but follows with, "They say, no. No. Russia didn't have." The implication is that the narrative on foreign interference has shifted, leading to the assertion that "now they're saying Russia had nothing to do with it." The speaker adds a broader hypothetical, stating, "Because if I say Russia, that it's perfectly fine. But you could add China and about five other countries to it." Amid these discussions, the speaker reiterates praise for Tulsi Gabbard: "But she's done a great job, and Pam has done a fantastic job, and we appreciate it both." The closing lines suggest a personal note about not having seen the person in a while: "I haven't seen you in a couple of times. And I have one of..." The remainder of the sentence is cut off in the transcript.

Speaker 2 notes that some members of Congress may be personally compromised and don’t want the truth to get out. Speaker 3 says: “You got powerful people, and they write the big checks” who “love their money” and protect it. He describes a honeypot tactic, noting Russians used it; overseas trips can lead to scandal, with a well-dressed man whispering, “There’s tapes out on you” before a key vote. He recalls a trip with Andy Biggs and being pressured after sleeping with someone abroad. He cites a Chinese prostitution ring busted in Washington, DC with a client list of “High ranking officials, in government, elected officials, and lobbyists,” whose story disappeared. He says these people are “employed by forces that want to control Congress” via spouses or employment agencies, “they employ them.” He concludes, “America's not buying that… 12% of the population votes, this is what you get.”

The speaker discusses the lack of transparency in government actions, mentioning secretive partnerships and asymmetry of information. They question collaborations with China on sensitive research and criticize institutions like universities and newspapers for failing to provide accurate information to the public. The conversation highlights concerns about hidden agendas and power dynamics at play behind the scenes.

The speaker claims that every Canadian prime minister has been compromised by agents of influence working for Chinese intelligence. This poses a significant security risk, raising concerns about who is truly in control of the country. They suggest the need for an independent investigation to protect against future threats, citing Australia's law against foreign interference as a model to follow.

There are members of Congress who are controlled by intel agencies. A high-ranking member of the House Intel Committee admitted to being spied on by the NSA. Even though he provides oversight, they still monitor him. Michael McCall, a leader among neoconservatives, accused someone of being a Russian agent based on what the intel briefers told him. When confronted, he defended himself by saying he believed the intel. This highlights the manipulation and control exerted by intel agencies over politicians.

Every federal government from Mulroney to Trudeau has been compromised by agents of Communist China.

How independent is your reporting when you're paid by Bill Gates? Are you a journalist, or what are you? Are you an independent journalist? Why do you spread such pleasurable and completely unfounded claims? Why do you do that? Do you think raids have something to do with the Russian march? Are you deliberately spreading things that... English Translation: How independent is your reporting when Bill Gates is paying you? Are you a journalist, or what are you? Are you an independent journalist? Why are you spreading such enjoyable yet completely unfounded claims? Why do you do that? Do you think raids are connected to the Russian advance? Are you deliberately spreading misinformation...?

Unelected deep state operatives pose a threat to democracy by pursuing their own hidden agendas. However, I am encouraged by the unexpected support we have gained from those who may not necessarily agree with us. This support is truly remarkable and beautiful. Eventually, the truth behind this situation will be revealed, and it is both concerning and disheartening.

When long-time politicians treat honesty, decency, truth, and the rule of law lightly, it negatively impacts politics. Their calls for inquiries often seem motivated by a desire to align with far-right agendas rather than genuine concern.

Speaker 0 is being accused of spreading a Russian plan, but this claim is dismissed by both parties and former heads of the CIA. The accusation is considered garbage and not believed by anyone, including Speaker 0's friend Bernie.

I believe members of Congress should be investigated for potential ill-gotten gains. There seems to be no other explanation for their consistent support of poor legislation. It's possible their spouses or significant others are employed by the very departments or quasi-governmental agencies that benefit from these votes. Until we investigate these potential conflicts of interest, the American people will continue to distrust Congress, and rightfully so.

Our government is radical and dangerous. The FBI is investigating me for looking into Biden corruption in Ukraine. Special Agent Bracco questioned my sources about me, a member of the free press. I wonder why the Bidens live in luxury on a civil servant's salary. They would imprison me if they could. Translation: The government is dangerous and investigating me for probing Biden corruption in Ukraine. The FBI questioned my sources about my work as a journalist. I question how the Bidens afford lavish lifestyles on a government salary. They would arrest me if possible.

The FBI is being accused of corruption and targeting politicians, parents, and ordinary citizens. Whistleblowers have bravely come forward, facing retaliation and being blocked from working both inside and outside the FBI. This is a troubling time for the American people.

They aim to harm us for disagreeing with them. Our justice system no longer prioritizes truth, but winning at all costs.

In the European Parliament, colleagues are feeling fearful as they realize they are not serving the people's best interests. They acknowledge that the current government is not for the people but for global misanthropists. People are no longer fooled by climate change rhetoric, and the truth is starting to come to light.

The speaker is asked about a letter they signed regarding the Hunter Biden situation. They express concern about Russian interference and misinformation, stating that intelligence agencies have found evidence of Russia pushing disinformation. They believe that disinformation is involved in this case and emphasize the importance of not trusting the Russians. When asked if they have any regrets, they state that they do not regret not trusting the Russians.

The atmosphere in the European Parliament is tense. Many colleagues are realizing they are not serving the people's best interests. It's no longer about the people, but about a global elite. They are starting to see that the public is no longer fooled by climate change rhetoric and are standing up against it.

I just spoke with some Republican members who are frustrated with Musk's involvement in political discussions. They are upset about his threats on X regarding primaries and feel he shouldn't interfere in the processes of elected officials. It's important to remember that Musk is not an elected representative; despite his wealth, he has no mandate from the public.