reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The recent court decision allows for the reinstatement of a regulation that gives the Department of Health the power to lock up or lock down New Yorkers without any proof of illness or exposure to a communicable disease. There are no time limits or location restrictions, meaning individuals can be detained for days, weeks, or even months in any facility chosen by the department. Once in quarantine, there is no procedure outlined for how individuals can be released. The attorney general's response to a judge's question about how families can get out of a facility was that they could hire a lawyer and sue. This situation is concerning and unbelievable.

Powers exist to enforce mandatory quarantines, which may include tracking individuals, using bracelets, and deploying police to ensure compliance.

This video suggests that the COVID pandemic was a test to see how far governments could go in forcing compliance. The speaker believes that the next step will be the establishment of "15 minute ghettos," which are actually about control and imprisoning people. The speaker points out that these areas are being built with barricades and surveillance cameras, not with schools or hospitals. They predict that digital ID will be used for control, similar to what is happening in China. The speaker warns that this future is not far off and urges viewers to fight against it.

The video discusses a map that shows how the US would be divided into districts in the event of an emergency. These districts would be controlled by FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security. The National Emergency Center Establishment Act does not authorize federal officers or employees to force individuals into these centers or prevent them from leaving. However, there are concerns that military personnel stationed at these centers could have the power to restrict movement. Civil liberty advocates argue that the legislation should be clarified to prevent abuse of power. The discussion also touches on the moral hazard of relying too heavily on government intervention during emergencies.

The video discusses the alleged plan by globalist organizations to implement worldwide martial law, forcibly inject people with experimental vaccines, and create a global government. It highlights the New Zealand pandemic plan as a test case for these measures. The speaker emphasizes the need to research and share this information to prevent the implementation of these draconian measures. The video also touches on topics such as deprogramming Trump supporters, internment and resettlement operations, and the potential for an American civil war. The speaker urges people to resist COVID lockdowns, mandates, and vaccine passports, and promises to cut federal funding to those who enforce such measures.

In this video, the speaker discusses the concept of biological destruction and its implications. They claim that powerful individuals intentionally create infections to control the population through mandatory vaccinations. These vaccines allegedly contain liquid crystals that can lodge in the brain cells and act as micro-receptors for electromagnetic waves. The speaker suggests that these waves can manipulate thoughts and turn people into zombies. They also mention the existence of underground cities and concentration camps in the United States, implying that those who resist the new definition of citizenship will be sent there. The speaker concludes by stating that Washington is anticipating certain events and will be responsible for triggering them.

The recent court decision allows for the reinstatement of a regulation that gives the Department of Health the power to lock up or lock down New Yorkers without any proof of illness or exposure to a communicable disease. There are no time limits or location restrictions, meaning individuals can be detained for days, weeks, or even months in any facility chosen by the department. Once in quarantine, there is no procedure outlined for how individuals can be released. The attorney general's response to a judge's question about how families can get out of a facility was that they could hire a lawyer and sue. This situation is concerning and unbelievable.

New York is currently in court discussing quarantine camps where the Department of Health can mandate isolation or quarantine without proof of sickness. This includes diseases like the common cold. The regulation also allows them to choose where to quarantine individuals, even if it's not in their own homes or local areas. The court is expected to make a decision in the next few months. This situation is concerning and some people are comparing it to the Hunger Games. It's important to be aware and prepared.

This video describes the situation in Israel regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. The speaker expresses frustration and anger towards the government for mandating the vaccine without consent. They believe that the vaccine is experimental and its effects are unknown. The speaker criticizes the lack of transparency and accuses the government of hiding information. They also mention concerns about vaccinating pregnant women and children. The speaker claims that those who refuse the vaccine are being treated as second-class citizens, with restrictions on work and access to certain places. They call for help from global human rights organizations and warn that this situation could happen in other countries.

This video discusses the implementation of Rule 213 in New York State, which allows the government to remove individuals from their homes and place them in quarantine for any disease, including non-contagious ones. The rule has faced legal challenges, but Governor Hochul appealed a previous decision and it has now been approved. There are concerns about the lack of age restrictions, due process, and time limits for quarantine. Additionally, individuals can be forced to take medication or vaccines, including experimental drugs, without the ability to prove they are not sick. The only remaining option for appeal is the New York State Court of Appeals. The speaker questions the constitutionality of the rule.

In this video, the speaker questions when a person can determine that they are no longer living in a free society. They mention various scenarios, such as restricted speech, forced medical procedures, limited freedom of movement, and ideological infiltration in education. The speaker then discusses a specific case where an NHS hospital is seeking to remove lifesaving treatment from a conscious 19-year-old girl, known as ST, who wants to prioritize her right to life. Despite being assessed as mentally sound by two psychiatrists, a judge ruled that ST is incapable of making decisions about her medical treatment. The family is also silenced from speaking publicly about the case. The speaker criticizes the judge's decision and the lack of public debate on the matter. They express concern about the erosion of free speech and the disregard for the sanctity of the family institution. The video concludes by emphasizing that when the state denies someone's right to life, it signifies a departure from a free society.

If you live in New York, sell your house, condo, or move out ASAP. They can take you to a concentration camp under the guise of quarantine. There's no stopping them. This is a warning to run fast and leave New York now. Like, subscribe, and follow for more updates.

According to the speaker, anyone living in Washington state should leave immediately because the state has "gone absolutely insane." The speaker claims that a recently passed medical bill allows the state government to do whatever they want to individuals during a declared medical emergency. The speaker alleges that, based on the advice of scientific experts, the state can force individuals to take mandated medical treatments. The speaker references a previous proposal to create internment camps for unvaccinated people, and suggests this could happen again. The speaker states they would not raise children or live in Washington state under these conditions.

I'm appealing the judge's ruling that the quarantine regulation is unconstitutional. We'll resolve this in court. There's already a law to address contagious individuals, so this is unnecessary and a waste of taxpayer money. This is evil; I believe it's an attempt to put Americans in quarantine camps. Stop the appeal; it's unconstitutional and you're wasting money. You're working for Hochul, and your actions are evil. I hope you lose in court. You're wasting taxpayer money and acting unconstitutionally.

The transcript presents a wide-ranging discussion surrounding alleged global control schemes, pandemic responses, and political voices that challenge mainstream narratives. Key points repeatedly asserted across speakers include: - Quarantine camps and mandatory isolation: Several speakers describe unvaccinated people being quarantined in regional facilities or camps, with police enforcing removal from homes and controlling movement. Quoted moments include claims of being told “from higher up where to take you” and references to being sent to Howard Springs, with entries about bracelets, police checkpoints, and long-term confinement in small cells. One account describes the experience as “inhumane,” like being imprisoned. - Legal authority for quarantine: Speakers contend there are laws and public health powers allowing mandatory quarantine in noncompliant populations, and note that states or authorities could isolate people against their will, sometimes with penalties for noncompliance. - FEMA camps and the “new world order” (NWO): There are persistent claims that FEMA camps exist or were planned as part of a broader agenda to detain large numbers of healthy people, with rhetoric about a “new world order” that would be permanent and tyrannical. The dialogue connects these ideas to a coordinated global power structure. - The “new world order” narrative and global elites: Multiple speakers describe a group of wealthy elites who allegedly seek to depopulate the world and establish a top-down authoritarian regime. References are made to depopulation schemes, the Georgia Guidestones, and statements by Rockefeller and Gates-adjacent figures. The idea that the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization, and the World Bank are part of a coordinated effort to impose a new global order recurs. - Warp speed vaccines and public health policy: A central claim is that the vaccine rollout was rushed (warp speed) to enable a broader economic reset and to justify lockdowns; vaccines are described as instruments used to control populations, with assertions that they would be administered under emergency use authorization unless fully FDA-approved. The defense of vaccine mandates is rejected by some speakers, who instead celebrate Trump for opposing mandates and for providing an option to refuse vaccination without being forced into quarantine camps. - Trump’s role and political realignments: Trump is portrayed as opposing mandates, opposing the military–industrial complex, and opposing censorship. Speakers credit him with halting or slowing the NWO’s preferred timeline and with defunding or challenging global institutions seen as part of the plan. Trump’s promotion of hydroxychloroquine and other early treatment considerations is discussed as part of his resistance to a mandated, centralized approach. - Media control and “fake news”: The transcript alleges that mainstream media are a propaganda arm (“mockingbird” operations) used to push state narratives, suppress dissent, and manipulate public opinion. Trump’s confrontations with the press are framed as part of dismantling this control. - COVID-19 lockdowns, surveillance, and social control: The dialogue claims lockdowns created a controlled, surveilled society, with contact tracing, restricted movement, and the normalization of authoritarian measures. The supposed transition to a “new normal” is described as a gradual, incremental shift toward permanent restrictions and biometric tracking systems. - Public activism and awakening: Speakers claim that the pandemic and related policies awakened large portions of the population—particularly conservative, Christian, and Republican sectors—to the alleged conspiracy. They suggest that open discussion, social media, and political action have expanded, reducing fear and encouraging resistance to mandates and censorship. - References to sources and figures: The conversation cites a range of sources and personalities, including Chad Vivas (an artist whose work is presented as revealing or countering the NWO narrative), General Michael Flynn, and Donald Trump. It also mentions broader associations with organizations like the United Nations, the World Health Organization, and the World Economic Forum as part of the alleged framework of control. - Historical and hypothetical mechanisms: Several speakers compare contemporary events to past episodes (e.g., Patriot Act, surveillance state) and to imagined blueprints (e.g., “lockstep” scenarios, digital IDs, vaccine passports, biometric tattoos). They discuss potential future crises as opportunities to solidify control, while asserting that public awareness and resistance have disrupted or weakened those plans. - Closing notes and visuals: The transcript closes with references to art and media promoting the narrative, including paintings and social media posts linked to the movement, and emphasizes ongoing themes of awakening, resistance, and civic engagement against what is portrayed as an ongoing global plan.

You must be vaccinated, wear a mask, and keep your business closed. If the state decides you need to be vaccinated, you have no choice. They can even force you to get vaccinated by taking you to a doctor and giving you a shot.

According to the speaker, anyone living in Washington state should leave immediately because the state has gone "absolutely insane." The speaker claims that Washington state passed a medical bill, signed by the governor, that allows the state to do whatever they want to individuals during a medical emergency. The speaker recalls that Washington previously discussed building internment camps for unvaccinated people. The speaker alleges that the state can dictate what happens to every individual based on "scientific experts" during a statewide emergency declared by the governor. The speaker asserts that individuals will be forced to take whatever "scientific experts" say they have to take. The speaker states they will not have their kids in that state and will not live in that state.

The speaker expresses concern that pandemic measures are being used to control people, leading to loss of rights and discrimination against the unvaccinated. They warn against totalitarianism and compare current restrictions to past oppressive regimes. The speaker emphasizes the dangers of government overreach and the potential for digital IDs to enable control.

In a recent appellate court decision in New York, it has been determined that Governor Kathy Hochul has the authority to detain individuals and place them in quarantine camps without providing a reason. This means that stormtroopers from New York State can kick in your door and take you away to a quarantine camp, leaving you unaware of the cause for your detainment. At 5 o'clock tonight, we will discuss this concerning development and speak with the attorney representing those affected. Following that, we will have a conversation with Marjorie Taylor Greene. Join us then.

In this video, the speakers discuss the concept of a new world order in the context of COVID-19. They mention the distinction between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals and how it affects their rights. They also touch on topics like outdoor gathering restrictions, contact tracing, and the need to build back better from the pandemic. One speaker talks about Agenda 21, a plan originating from the United Nations that aims to shift society towards collectivism and dependence on the state. They explain that this plan discourages private property ownership and promotes high-rise apartments provided by the state. The speakers emphasize the desire for people to be dependent on the government, while independent individuals with their own resources are seen as a threat to this vision.

The WHO international treaty being discussed at the UN allows for the suspension of civil liberties and rights in the event of a public health emergency, with no evidence required. Member states can be penalized for noncompliance, and the WHO has absolute immunity from criminal prosecution. This treaty, similar to past events like the anthrax scare and COVID, raises concerns about the potential abuse of power and loss of individual freedoms.

In this video, the speakers discuss the concept of self-spreading vaccines, which are genetically engineered to move through populations like communicable diseases. They highlight the potential risks and ethical concerns associated with this technology. The speakers also mention the government's involvement in funding and promoting these vaccines. They emphasize the importance of informed consent and express concerns about the potential consequences of releasing self-spreading vaccines on a global scale. The discussion raises questions about the safety and long-term effects of this technology. The speakers argue that the widespread use of self-spreading vaccines could infringe upon individual rights and lead to the suppression of dissenting voices.

Our government is out of control on this, and they are lawless. They completely disregard bioethics. They completely disregard the federal common rule. They have broken all the rules that I know of, that I've been trained on for years and years and years. These mandates of an experimental vaccine are explicitly illegal. They are explicitly inconsistent with the Nuremberg Code. They're explicitly inconsistent with the Belmont Report. They are flat out illegal, and they don't care. And the only

The speaker discusses the legal and scientific implications of the COVID crisis and the suspension of the constitution under 42 CFR Part 70 and 71. They mention the existence of Marburg, a highly fatal but not very contagious disease, and claim that it will be released through the lipid nanoparticles in the COVID shots. They also mention the government's preparation for a zombie apocalypse, as evidenced by FEMA's zombie commercials and training. The speaker suggests that there are therapeutic drugs available to combat Marburg and warns against falling for the government's plan to steer people into quarantine centers for mandatory shots.

This video claims that the current situation is not democratic and is driven by a pharmaceutical agenda. It suggests that this agenda will enslave humanity and lead to a dystopian nightmare. The speaker believes that ignorance and greed will control our lives, harm our children, and destroy our hopes and dignity.