reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker doubts the Democratic convention will win new voters, believing it caters to their base instead of recruiting new people. The speaker feels the Democratic party isn't interested in addressing important issues such as public safety, border security, and the handling of undocumented individuals. The speaker claims that 8,000,000 undocumented individuals were allowed in under Kamala Harris's leadership.

The speakers discuss the legitimacy of various elections, including the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections. They express concerns about Russian interference, voter suppression, and irregularities with electronic voting machines. Some speakers believe that the election outcomes were affected and that the presidents were illegitimate. They mention specific cases like Bush vs. Gore in 2000 and the 2004 Ohio election. Stacey Abrams' loss in Georgia is also mentioned, with some speakers claiming that her election was stolen. Overall, the speakers question the fairness and integrity of these elections.

If 200,000 illegals are put into swing states, there is a high likelihood that they will vote for a particular party. It's only a matter of time before they become citizens, and those swing states will no longer be swing states. We risk becoming a permanent one-party, deep blue socialist state. This was the game plan, and it almost succeeded. If the opposing party had won, they would have legalized enough illegals in swing states to flip them to blue states. They would win the presidency, House, and Senate, make DC a state, maybe Puerto Rico, and pack the Supreme Court. Then, they would keep importing more illegals to cement that outcome, similar to what happened in California.

The Democratic party is trying to destroy me by using entitlements fraud to attract illegal aliens, which will turn them into voters. In New York, illegal aliens can already vote in state and city elections, and FEMA was paying for them to stay in luxury hotels. This is a voter fraud scam to import voters. If you put 200,000 illegals in swing states, they will likely vote Democrat, turning those states blue and creating a permanent one-party socialist state. This was the Democrats' plan, and they almost succeeded. If they had won, they would have legalized enough illegals in swing states to make them permanently blue, ensuring a Democratic victory in the House, Senate, and presidency. Then they would pack the Supreme Court, add DC and Puerto Rico as states, and continue importing illegals to solidify their power, like what happened in California.

Immigrants with low IQs and no education come to the US, have many kids, vote Democrat, and increase population in certain states. This leads to more representation in Congress and electoral college for Democrats. The cycle continues with each generation becoming more radical and entitled. White people and Asians contribute the most to the economy, while immigrants consume resources, making the country less wealthy over time.

The speaker discusses the Great Replacement theory and the impact of undocumented immigrants on elections. They argue that illegal immigrants in blue states increase Democratic votes due to apportionment in the House and Electoral College. The other speaker counters, stating that the Electoral College balances power for smaller and red states. The debate continues on the influence of illegal immigrants on election outcomes. Translation: The speaker talks about the Great Replacement theory and how undocumented immigrants affect elections in blue states, leading to a discussion on the Electoral College's role in balancing power.

Non-citizens are not allowed to vote under federal law, but the Biden-Harris administration and some states are undermining this. The SAVE Act, requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration, was blocked by Democrats in the Senate. The wide-open border, with an estimated 16 million illegal aliens in the country, raises concerns about non-citizen voting. Some house races are decided by very few votes, so illegal participation could be decisive. California's ballot harvesting and Wisconsin's unmanned ballot boxes in public parks are also seen as opening the door to fraud. The speaker believes Republicans will win the House, Senate, and White House.

This election is a critical turning point, and it's why I've become politically active now. I believe that failing to elect Trump will result in the loss of democracy and the two-party system in the US. There are only a handful of swing states where the margin of victory is very small. The current administration is bringing large numbers of undocumented immigrants into these states. You can see the numbers on government websites. The increases in the number of illegals are enormous, in some cases up to 700%. If a state has a 10 or 20,000 vote margin and you add 200,000 illegals, it's no longer a swing state.

Yale University study suggests that the number of illegal aliens in the US is over 22 million, not 11 million. The Democratic party supports legalizing all illegal immigrants, potentially adding 22 million new voters. Historically, most first-time immigrant voters have voted Democrat. This could create a permanent electoral majority for Democrats. The focus of the immigration debate is not about improving the country or meeting labor needs, but about securing power for Democrats.

The speaker believes the Democratic party is attempting to destroy them because they are exposing the "entitlements fraud" that attracts and keeps illegal aliens in the US. This fraud includes Social Security, disability, and Medicaid. The speaker claims that ending this fraud would cause illegal aliens to leave, resulting in a loss of Democratic voters. The speaker alleges illegal aliens can already vote in state and city elections in New York, with 600,000 registered. They also claim FEMA was paying for illegal aliens to stay in luxury hotels in New York, even after an executive order to stop it, and that New York sued the federal government to continue receiving this money. The speaker asserts that Democrats are "buying voters" by importing them, and that this is an attempt to destroy democracy. They believe that legalizing enough illegal aliens in swing states would turn them into reliably Democratic states, leading to a permanent one-party socialist state. The speaker supported Trump to prevent this outcome, which they believe would have been the "end" of America.

Many speakers express concerns about unvetted immigration leading to issues in Europe. They discuss the impact of migrants on the population in cities like Amsterdam and London. The replacement theory is debated, with some calling it racist and dangerous while others see it as a positive change. There are discussions about the potential for illegal immigrants to gain voting rights and the laws surrounding noncitizens voting in federal elections. Overall, the video covers various viewpoints on immigration, diversity, and political implications.

The Democrat propaganda machine is fired up to destroy me because entitlements fraud, including Social Security, disability, Medicaid, and entitlements fraud for illegal aliens, acts as a magnet, pulling people from around the world and keeping them here. If we end illegal alien fraud, we turn off that magnet, they leave, and Democrats lose voters. In New York, illegal aliens can already vote in state and city elections. FEMA, meant to support Americans in distress, was paying for luxury hotels for illegals in New York. They're buying voters; it's a giant voter fraud scam. If you put 200,000 illegals in swing states, with an 80% likelihood of voting Democrat, and they become citizens, those states will turn blue, leading to a permanent one-party, deep blue socialist state.

Speaker 1 believes that if Trump doesn't win the election, it will be the last election because Democrats are importing illegals via a secret CBP border app program. He claims this is illegal, but the DOJ isn't stopping it. According to Speaker 1, government websites show triple-digit increases in illegals in swing states, sometimes up to 700% over the last 3 years. He asserts that asylum seekers are fast-tracked to citizenship and vote Democrat, prioritizing bringing family to the US and being beholden to Democratic handouts. Speaker 1 predicts another four years of a Democratic administration will lead to legalizing enough illegals to eliminate swing states, turning the US into a single-party country like California, which became a super-majority Democrat state after the 1986 amnesty. He states California recently passed a law making voter ID illegal in any election.

Legal immigrants tend to lean Democrat, potentially impacting elections. The census counts all people, not just citizens, affecting House seats and electoral votes. Without counting illegal immigrants, blue states could lose 20 House seats and electoral votes. The Electoral College aims to balance power between smaller and larger states, contrary to the impact of illegal immigrants in blue states.

The speaker claims the Biden-Harris administration and some states are undermining election integrity, not them. Federal law prohibits non-citizens from voting, but states have issues. The speaker says the House passed the SAVE Act, requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration, but Chuck Schumer and the Democrats blocked it in the Senate. The speaker alleges the open border policy is a Democratic strategy to enable non-citizen voting. They estimate 16 million illegal aliens are in the country since the border was opened, raising concerns about their potential illegal participation in elections, where some races are decided by very few votes. The speaker also cites California's ballot harvesting and unmanned ballot boxes in Wisconsin as potential sources of fraud.

The speaker discusses the issue of illegal people being brought into Wisconsin and receiving free IDs for voting, even without proper documentation. They suggest that this could be a form of election interference, with the possibility of individuals being incentivized to vote a certain way. The speaker urges people to wake up to what is happening in the United States.

There are concerns about noncitizens potentially voting in elections due to lack of citizenship verification. Democrats oppose a bill requiring proof of citizenship to vote. Loopholes exist, allowing noncitizens to vote without consequences. Democrats are accused of exploiting this for political gain. The issue is seen as election interference and a threat to American voters. The conversation highlights the impact of illegal voting on citizens' rights.

The speaker discusses foreign interference in elections and questions why the president is not pursuing this avenue. They mention evidence of votes being sent overseas and foreign actors meddling in elections. The speaker then explains how voter rolls are kept in foreign nations, such as Pakistan, and how fake ballots are attributed to registered voters who have not yet voted. They reveal that 171,000 blank fake ballots were dropped into the system and attributed to different people, ultimately benefiting the Democratic candidates. The speaker concludes by stating that there are other aspects of foreign involvement in elections.

Recently, a discussion arose regarding how federal authorities allow illegal aliens to fly without ID, while American citizens face restrictions. This raises a critical voting rights issue: as new voters are imported, the political power of existing citizens is diluted. The focus should not be on race but on the impact of demographic changes on democracy. Democrats support mass immigration to gain electoral advantage, not out of compassion. Historical examples, like California's shift from Republican to Democratic dominance post-1986 immigration reforms, illustrate this trend. The influx of immigrants with differing political views has transformed states, undermining the political power of long-term residents. Ultimately, this strategy threatens the democratic principle of one person, one vote.

The great replacement theory is presented not as a conspiracy but as a fundamental aspect of the Democratic Party's platform. The discussion also touches on the implications of the 2020 election.

Speaker 0: 11, that the great replacement theory is not some grand right wing conspiracy theory, but a basic statement of the Democratic party's platform. Let's That the twenty twenty election was

This election is a critical turning point for democracy in America. If Trump doesn't win, we risk losing the two-party system. Swing states, which have narrow margins of victory, are being flooded with illegal immigrants, drastically changing their voting dynamics. This strategy could lead to permanent Democratic control, eliminating competitive elections. For example, California has passed laws making it illegal to show ID when voting, raising concerns about election integrity. Most countries require ID to vote, and without it, election fraud becomes untraceable. If the Democrats win this election, they will legalize enough illegals to secure swing states, leading to a future where every election favors them, similar to California, with no escape for voters. This is our last chance to preserve democracy.

The speaker questions whether Democrats support an open border and asks if noncitizens will be eligible to vote in New York. The other speaker denies this, stating that noncitizens have not been eligible to vote in New York since the 19th century. The first speaker disagrees, mentioning that the New York City Council recently passed a law allowing noncitizens to vote in municipal elections starting in 2023. They argue that this is part of a plan to turn illegal immigrants into voters. The second speaker clarifies that this is only being considered in certain areas, not the entire country. The first speaker expresses concern about the impact on American elections and the constitution.

The New York City Council voted to allow noncitizens to vote in municipal elections starting in 2023. Similar measures are being considered in other states. The speaker argues that this is a plan to turn illegal immigrants into voters and claims that the open border policy is connected to this. They believe that American elections should be decided by American citizens and express concern about losing the country's security and sovereignty. They emphasize that allowing people from 160 different countries to influence elections is a problem.

Yale study suggests over 22 million illegal aliens in the US. Democrats push for their legalization, potentially adding 22 million new voters who tend to vote Democrat. This could secure a permanent electoral majority for Democrats. Immigration debate is about power, not improving the country or meeting labor needs.