reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker shares a concern with the president regarding the World Health Organization and Gavi. They claim these organizations partnered during the COVID-19 pandemic to advise social media companies to suppress dissenting views, stifle free speech, and silence legitimate questions. The speaker also asserts that Gavi has continued to make questionable recommendations, encouraging pregnant women to receive COVID-19 vaccines.

- it's that he took the COVID vaccine off the recommended schedule for children. - 95% of parents were already rejecting that advice, and actually 85% of healthcare workers rejecting that advice. - when these people in the media say that they are standing up for science, they are saying they're going against 95% of parents, and they want every single six month old in this country to have a mandated mRNA COVID injection. - There is a memo going around at the CDC and throughout HHS about how to subvert president Trump and how to subvert secretary Kennedy. - They're saying we're gonna outlast them, that the Republicans are gonna lose the midterms, that this is gonna be a flash in the pan.

Prominent Democrats, including John Kerry, Tim Wallace, and Hillary, are allegedly saying that the First Amendment is a bad thing. These top-level Democrats view the First Amendment as an obstacle. The frequent use of the word "disinformation" is an indication that the speaker believes these individuals are creating disinformation. Those trying to suppress freedom of speech are considered the "bad guys." It is astonishing that this is happening in America in 2024.

I have an issue when it comes to targeting our kids and trying to change their gender. I don't care if a 40-year-old person wants to undergo gender reassignment, but I don't want to hear about it, pay for it, or be forced to acknowledge their chosen identity. Leave me alone and stay away from our children.

They're screaming that they hate America and blame us. They want to defund the police. They call us extremists and say our words hurt their feelings. They support drag queens teaching kids, but we think it's inappropriate. We don't have anything against liberals, but the people representing them are communists and criminals. They want to make America miserable. They can try to burn down the city and cancel everything, but it's not their America. Kids are getting killed and the police are blamed. The former president got arrested, the current one lost but got elected. Pedophiles are protected and abortion is allowed anytime. We're divided and confused.

The speaker recalls being ridiculed during a 2020 Democratic debate for advocating a return to the party's roots of fighting for the people and free speech. According to the speaker, the Democratic Party has since become more extreme because it is not rooted in the Constitution. The speaker claims that many Democrats refuse to accept objective truth, citing the example of denying the existence of men and women. The speaker alleges that this denial stems from a spiritual problem where individuals believe they are God and can designate truth.

The speaker states they cannot support a party that wants to redefine family, which they consider the core of society. They cannot vote for laws that would allow children to mutilate their bodies, possibly without parental consent, or that would allow LGBTQ+ couples to marry. They also cannot support a party that favors parents losing custody for not affirming a child's transition, children of opposite sexes sharing bathrooms, or biological males competing against the speaker's daughter in sports. The speaker is not pushing their views on others, but sharing the reasons for their voting decision. They suggest voters should ask which party promotes values that are unbiblical and directly contradict a Christian worldview. While both parties may promote some biblical values, the speaker believes the listed issues are weightier matters and influence their vote.

The speakers question why anyone would vote for Democrats, citing open borders, gender-affirming care, and lenient stances on child trafficking as reasons. One speaker claims Democrats in California don't prioritize punishing child traffickers. Another speaker asserts that California is attempting to lower the age of consent to 14 and is decriminalizing the sale of sex. They believe a 16 or 17-year-old should not have to prove force, fraud, or coercion in sex trafficking cases for perpetrators to be jailed. They describe this as a "slippery slope" and question how anyone can still vote for the Democratic party.

"What greater fight for freedom is there than to have control over your own body? And up until the point where your children are 18, you get to make that decision for them too. If not, if that is not the case, then you don't have freedom. If you don't decide what's going into your child, then your child is property of the US government. If they can inject your children beyond your will and there's nothing you can do about it, they can't get the education your taxes are paying for, then we have been reduced to nothing more than farm animals being lined up by Farmer Joe and vaccinated at will with any crazy technology they can come up with like mRNA technology which we know has been disastrous and skipped its safety trials. We are fighting to put all that to an end."

The Democrats are accused of supporting the sexualization of children, with claims that this aligns with pedophilic behavior. It is suggested that their policies, including those endorsed by President Biden regarding transgender surgeries for minors, contribute to this narrative.

"Transgendered ideology, it's based in fraud." "We are born or we are conceived either a girl or a boy from eternity." "We are not plethora of unending gender choices." "So the whole concept that this is free choice is absolutely a lie." "Right? It isn't medical based. It isn't scientifically based." "And then we to further add insult to injury, we wanna recommend immediately that they go into a pipeline of drugs." "Children are being preyed upon, and they're being preyed upon by those who want to make them a part or a symbol of this movement, this religious cult."

In the nineties, the speaker says they were anti-war, pro-free speech, and pro-gay rights. Now, the speaker claims the left is pro-censorship, pro-war, and engaged in horrible medical mistreatment of gay children in the name of trans medicine. The speaker questions who changed, asserting their values have stayed the same, at least on those issues.

The speaker acknowledges the positive aspects of gender transition but questions the extremism and lack of moderation within the LGBTQIA+ movement. They believe that the movement creates division and contradictions, such as claiming there are many ways to be a woman but then insisting there is only one way. The speaker argues that children should not be subjected to gender ideology and that allowing them to undergo irreversible procedures is a form of cruelty. They also oppose men competing in women's sports and changing language norms. The speaker emphasizes the importance of freedom and free speech in America.

Kamala supports taxpayer-funded sex change surgeries for prisoners. Every transgender inmate in the prison system would have access to that. Kamala supports transgender sex changes in jail with taxpayer money. Kamala even supports letting biological men compete against girls in sports. Kamala is for they/them. Donald Trump is for you.

Prominent Democrats, including John Kerry, Tim Wallace, and Hillary, are allegedly saying that the First Amendment is a bad thing. These top-level Democrats view the First Amendment as an obstacle. The frequent use of the word "disinformation" is an indication that the speaker believes these individuals are creating disinformation. Those trying to suppress freedom of speech are considered the "bad guys." It is astonishing that this is happening in America in 2024.

The speaker claims they are attacked for not believing in democracy, but the most sacred right in the U.S. democracy is the First Amendment. They state that Kamala Harris wants to threaten the power of the government, and there is no First Amendment right to misinformation. The speaker believes big tech silences people, which is a threat to democracy. They want Democrats and Republicans to reject censorship and persuade one another by arguing about ideas. The speaker references yelling fire in a crowded theater as the Supreme Court test. They accuse others of wanting to kick people off Facebook for saying toddlers shouldn't get masks.

Washington Democrats wanted to take children away from their parents if they didn't agree with gender affirmation surgery. Now, Democrats in Minnesota are proposing a bill that could protect pedophiles from discrimination, similar to the LGBTQ+ community. They have acronyms like MAPS and YAPS, which normalize these ideas. It seems like they are attacking everything good, just, and innocent about our country and children. Why would they remove the exclusion unless they support it?

The speaker claims the Biden administration covered up science related to the COVID shot. Information related to vaccine complications was allegedly censored as COVID vaccine hesitant content. The speaker alleges the heart inflammation in young, healthy men and boys was not disclosed as soon as it should have been, resulting in thousands of kids developing myocarditis unnecessarily. The speaker suggests the administration knew the shot didn't stop transmission but kept it secret. The head of the FDA is cited as saying the Biden administration suppressed information about myocarditis damage to children. The speaker believes this sounds criminal, especially considering mandates for school, work, and travel.

The speaker objects to the claim that Democrats are a party of pedophiles. They state that while Democrats support children being sexualized and having transgender surgeries, and that President Biden himself supports this, this does not make them pedophiles. The speaker equates sexualizing children with what pedophiles do.

Democrats lost because they framed border security as racist and dismissed concerns about illegal immigration. The term "Latinx" failed to resonate with voters. They alienated parents by labeling them as terrorists for opposing explicit content in schools. Misrepresenting January 6 as a catastrophic event rather than a misguided protest hurt their credibility. Additionally, they promoted ideas that contradict biological realities, such as men giving birth. Lastly, free speech is a fundamental right, not a privilege that can be restricted.

Canada is a country based on rights and freedoms that offers the freedom to pursue a better life, and freedom from fear, violence, intimidation, and discrimination. These freedoms foster inclusivity, protect the vulnerable, and build stronger communities. Some voices redefine freedom for their own purposes, disregarding the freedoms of others. They claim freedom as an excuse to do as they wish, spreading misinformation and echoing those who wish to interfere in elections and undermine democracy. They advocate limits on reproductive rights. Ultimately, they mean freedom for some, not freedom for all. Those who claim to speak for freedom often want the government to decide who people can love, who they are, or even what they can wear.

The speaker expresses concern about government overreach in education, citing critical race theory, critical gender theory, and transgender policies in schools. They claim schools are hiding gender transitions from parents via parental secrecy policies. The speaker questions the requirement to register children with schools and potentially disclose parental teaching methods. They worry about parents teaching creationism or the belief that life begins at conception being targeted. The speaker does not trust the Illinois governor and state government, believing these policies will be weaponized against those with differing beliefs, similar to how adoption has allegedly been restricted for some Christians.

Mark Zuckerberg admitted the Biden-Harris administration pressured Facebook to censor COVID-19 content and information regarding the laptop. Speaker 1 states this confirms what many already knew and praises Zuckerberg for speaking out. They highlight Kamala Harris's focus on "freedom" in her campaign, including during debates and speeches at the Democratic convention. However, Speaker 1 argues Zuckerberg's admission exposes Harris and Biden for censoring free speech through Facebook. Speaker 1 concludes that Harris's words do not align with her actions and urges people to examine her record when considering her fitness for the presidency.

David Deliden recounts a raid by five or six California Department of Justice agents who entered his apartment with AR-15s and canine units after presenting a search warrant. He describes the scene as a windowless white van arriving, and the agents conducting the home search on that spring day. Deliden explains that starting in 2013, he organized an almost three-year, in-depth investigative journalism study focused on the harvesting and trafficking of body parts from late-term abortions. He states there were multiple violations and issues involved, including the creation of a system that incentivizes the objectification and destruction of human beings to sustain a business around selling body parts. For about thirty months, his team went undercover with the explicit purpose of partnering with major Planned Parenthood abortion clinics to have technicians harvest body parts from abortions performed that day, package the parts, and ship them to various customers locally and worldwide. In July 2015, the Undercover video series began to be released. Deliden says he expected a small audience, but the response was far larger: within less than a week, the first video reached about 3,000,000 views on YouTube, and multiple congressional committees announced federal investigations into Planned Parenthood’s involvement in fetal trafficking and fetal experimentation. He claims that the truth about Planned Parenthood’s leadership describing their participation went viral and was publicized globally. He asserts that Kamala Harris, with explicit instruction from Planned Parenthood, targeted him specifically among undercover video reporters in California to enforce the California video recording law against him and to punish him for exposing information about Planned Parenthood and Kamala Harris’s powerful donors. He states that two weeks before serving the search warrant on his home, Harris had a secret meeting in Los Angeles with several top Planned Parenthood executives. Deliden says California DOJ investigator reports showed Planned Parenthood’s top California lawyer instructed that the video equipment and the computers used to publish the videos be seized to shut him up and prevent him from continuing to publish what he describes as the truth about Planned Parenthood’s involvement in fetal trafficking. Deliden characterizes Planned Parenthood and their political supporters as shameless, willing to say whatever is necessary and to use all available power to push their agenda. He concludes by reiterating that Kamala Harris is “the single greatest threat to First Amendment civil liberties that our country has ever seen,” asserting that if she becomes a heartbeat away from the presidency, she would have a White House official who disrespects First Amendment civil liberties and seeks to punish dissenting viewpoints.