reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 1, who identifies as Russia, says: We did not break in. We did not broke shit. They were Antifa. We told the DC police, there's Antifa. Go get them. They did not move. They use on a pepper spray, mace, rubber palette. They treat us like we're animals. From beginning, when we start going down the steps up way before we enter the shit building. And then they start with the pack. They hit two woman in the head. There's three kids, probably 17, 18. They were bleeding in the head. There's two elderly people. One of them in a cave, got maced. So we did not break shit. The woman the police shot her, and then they throw her by the stairs. We did not break shit. We told DC police, those are Antifa. Go get them. We wear mega hat. We don't have much shoes. We don't look like we're in a crack. Those antifa, you tell them, they're in a fucking crack. Filthy disgusting. DC did not do nothing. They just stand up. They just stand up. Speaker 0 asks: So it wasn't it wasn't the MAGA people that that get that... Speaker 1, Russia, responds: It wasn't MAGA inside the city, whatever my brain froze. Capitol all day. The doors are open. There's Antifa has a black chair, folding chair. The cops seen him. Whether it's us or Antifa, you see somebody with a metal chair fold it. That means it's a fucking weapon. You will stop him. We go and tell them. There's probably people were taking video of me telling the police. Go get Antifa. We catch two. And the woman that there was a woman talking to them, and I told her, don't bother the police. Leave the police alone. They need to choose a side. If they lost us, they have no support. And then they start with pushing back back and hitting people. So it's not us. It's not us. Speaker 0 clarifies: Antifa It was... Speaker 1: The DC police saw them with a fucking black metal folding chair. They saw them. We pointed at them. They saw the brat boy following Antifa guy, and they did not do shit. One of Antifa could have a fucking knife to get one of us inside. No one did shit. Don't tell us we broke in. We did not break a glass. So you got in, but it wasn't you guys. The doors are open. The door. And guess what? It's a federal building. The police has no power on us. It's a federal building. It's our building. Speaker 0: Right. Okay. So it wasn't it wasn't the MAGA people that broke in. Speaker 1: Nope. We told DC police, those fucking antifa go get them. Okay. Speaker 0 asks: What's your name? Speaker 1: Russia. Speaker 0: Russia? Where are you from? Speaker 1 explains: I can't. It's a I'm under the state No. No. No. I came from Lebanon. I run from Lebanon because of this shit. And I'm not gonna raise my kids in that shit. Speaker 0 thanks Asha and says: Thank you. You need to do a testimonial of what happened. Put it on Twitter. Put it on every news channel because What? Speaker 1 completes: Fist this off. Black Lives Matter burned the country. Burned the city. They were ordered the police to back back, standby. They were not allowed to use tear gas. They were not allowed to use maze. They were not allowed to use rubber bullets. On us, they're. When they went in the White House and burned the church, all the fucking congress went and told Trump, you let your people pepper spray them. Meanwhile, BLM came there with a fucking weapons. Screw the police. They lost our support. Yes. Amen. They begin they're all gonna follow order. When we stand up in the front of Black Lives Matter to protect a cop I'm a woman and I did it numerous time in New Jersey. I didn't ever say we go in a rally and sadness know. But now, if I see a cop get shot, I would kill myself before I save him and mark my words on it. Speaker 0 closes: Thank you, Asha. Good to see you.

Speaker 1, Johnny, is being chased by Antifa. They discuss trans ideology and the danger in Gaza. Speaker 0 warns about being killed by Muslims. Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of assault.

Speaker 1 describes their experience at the Capitol, stating that they were not violent and did not support the actions of those who were. They emphasize that they were there to make a symbolic statement and show their frustration with the current state of the country. Speaker 1 mentions that some individuals associated with Antifa were causing trouble and being aggressive towards the police. They also mention helping someone who had an epileptic seizure. Speaker 0 confirms that Speaker 1 is credible and mentions that Speaker 1 believes Antifa breached the gates, leading to others following suit.

The conversation opens with Speaker 0 expressing irritation about smoking, saying, “Smoking induce shit to me. I go to the casino twice a week. Fuck your smoke.” The exchange quickly shifts to a request for clarification or communication: Speaker 1 asks, “It like, from the local or I will send you a message?” and Speaker 2 repeats the detail, noting “The casino twice a week, bitch.” A brief interjection acknowledges a small moment of support or appreciation, as Speaker 0 mentions Alaska Post with an Amazon Prime sub and adds, “Thank you. It’s a dumb by the way, the Amazon Prime sub.” The tone then pivots to a discussion about screens and expectations for the group’s audience or participants. Speaker 2 criticizes having “too many screens,” while Speaker 1 asserts a standards-based stance: “we are very selective, and we we're not here for people who just say too many screens. Either you fucking marinate and you figure it out or you don't. Just fine if you don't.” This reveals a commitment to a certain level of engagement or preparation from participants. The dialogue returns to a chaotic incident as Speaker 2 asks about a situation, “Hold on. Jerry, I see Jerry. Did they just chase Jerry out? I don't know.” Speaker 1 responds, “Sure. Sure. You didn't do nothing wrong, man.” But Speaker 2 pushes back, insisting someone did something: “I didn't nothing. Yes. You did, bro. You fucking knocked the old man out of his chair. People.” The narration then pivots to a description of an event in progress: “So it's in slow. He was driving down the street. I got you. I got it. I got it.” The speakers explain that they had told someone to stay home, repeatedly: “We told him to stay home, bro. Fuck. We told him to stay home, dude. We told him to fucking stay home, dude. We told him to stay home.” The commenters attribute the action to “Spider Mike,” who allegedly knocked the old man down, and they acknowledge gratitude: “Thank you. Thank you. Send it to him, please.” A subsequent query asks whether anyone witnessed the incident or has video evidence: “Anybody witness this or have any video of this? Not for you.” The exchange repeats the sentiment of a witness or footage request: “Not for you.” The conversation concludes with a sense of closure or reflection as Speaker 2 notes, “It’s beautiful. And I I just stood there, and then he just went back.” Throughout, the participants reference a chaotic scene surrounding a dispute or altercation near the casino, involving force against an older person, the instruction to stay home, and a call for witnesses or video documentation, all framed within a broader discussion about engagement standards and personal conduct.

A journalist captured a video at The Capitol showing two suspicious individuals dressed like government agents. One of them encouraged people to break the windows and enter the building. The journalist warned against it and filmed one of the individuals pulling out a large pane of glass before dropping it upon realizing he was being recorded. The individual then blamed a protester for breaking the window and even threatened to punch him. Despite clear evidence of criminal damage, the person has not been charged. This raises questions about why. The individual was also encouraging others to open the window further.

Speaker 1 states they are waiting to punch someone and will be happy to go to jail for it. Speaker 1 says, "We're trespassing when the cat will go." Speaker 0 says Speaker 1 stated, "I've been trespassing on the capitol." Speaker 1 repeats they are waiting to punch someone. Speaker 0 says if Speaker 1 has been waiting for this, why did she deny the sergeant at arms from supplying Donald Trump's request? Speaker 0 claims it wasn't just negligence, but that she denied the request.

Russia describes the events at the Capitol as follows: They did not break in and did not break anything; they claim Antifa were the ones responsible for violence. They told DC police, There’s Antifa. Go get them. They say the police used pepper spray, mace, and rubber bullets on them, and they were treated like animals. From the start, as they went down the steps, before entering the building, they say Antifa began with a pack. They claim two women were hit in the head, three kids around 17–18 were bleeding in the head, and two elderly people, one of them, they say, was maced. They assert a woman was shot by the police and then thrown by the stairs, and reiterate, We did not break shit. They claim they wore MAGA hats and did not have good shoes; they say Antifa told them they were in a crack and described Antifa as filthy and disgusting. They state DC did nothing and just stood up. Speaker 0 asks if it wasn’t the MAGA people who got in, and Russia says the doors were open, the Capitol doors were open, and Antifa had a black folding chair; the cops saw it and, whether it was them or Antifa, a metal chair indicates a weapon. They say they told police, There’s probably people taking video of me telling the police, Go get Antifa. They claim they caught two Antifa and that the woman talking to them should not bother the police, Leave the police alone. They say the police need to choose a side, and if they lose us, they have no support. They claim Antifa started pushing back and hitting people, and that it was not them. They insist it was Antifa; the DC police saw Antifa with a black metal folding chair and did not act. They state that one Antifa could have a knife to get one of them inside and again say no one acted. They insist they did not break in; the doors were open; it’s a federal building, and the police have no power there; it’s their building. Russia reiterates that it wasn’t the MAGA people who broke in, and that they told DC police, Those fucking antifa go get them. They identify themselves as from Lebanon, having fled Lebanon because of the situation, and say they run from it and won’t raise their kids in that environment. Speaker 0 thanks Russia and asks for a testimonial to be shared online. Russia says to share it on Twitter and every news channel. They state Black Lives Matter burned the country and the city, and that they were ordered to back up while police stood down, not allowed to use tear gas, mace, or rubber bullets, and that when they went to the White House and burned the church, Congress told Trump to let his people pepper spray them. They claim BLM came with weapons, and that cops lost their support. Speaker 0 agrees, saying it’s unfortunate. Russia adds that when they stood in front of Black Lives Matter to protect a cop, they are a woman and did so in New Jersey; they would kill themselves before saving a police officer if they saw one get shot. Speaker 0 concludes by thanking Asha and goodbyes, acknowledging a testament.

People are celebrating an accomplishment. They say, "We did this shit together," and "We took this shit." Someone broke a window. One person says people might burn something down, but it might be too late for that. They have knives. Someone says they don't want to see anyone get hurt and that they will make a pass.

The speaker points out a suspicious individual wearing black gear and speculates if they are part of Antifa. They highlight the person's aggressive actions towards the window and questions why they are wearing a wire. The speaker criticizes Democrats for focusing on Trump's role rather than addressing these suspicious incidents. They mention a cop who allowed people into the Capitol and wonders why this hasn't been explained. The speaker also mentions individuals taking selfies with police officers and questions the FBI's handling of information regarding the march. They conclude by expressing frustration with Liz Cheney and Nancy Pelosi for avoiding these questions.

The transcript captures a single speaker, identified as Speaker 0, directing a torrent of explicit hostility toward police or masked police officers during what appears to be a chaotic or dangerous scene. The speaker repeatedly uses profanity and targets authority figures with anger and contempt, demanding action and accountability in a heated moment. The sequence begins with Speaker 0 shouting, "Fuck you. He's Siri. Call 911." The phrase "He's Siri" is followed by a directive to summon emergency help, "Call 911." The speaker then challenges the authority or competence of the officers by declaring, "You're not a traffic cop. Clear it out." Immediately after, the speaker reiterates disdain for the presence of masked police, saying, "You're not a traffic cop. Masked police, fuck you." The speaker directs the offensive demand, "Take your fucking mask off," and accuses the officers of jeopardizing their colleagues by their actions: "You almost hit your own guy, you motherfuckers." The confrontation escalates as the speaker comments on the officers’ conduct, observing a reaction or consequence, "Yep. And look at that." The speaker notes the officers’ subsequent departure from the scene with the phrase, "Then they get out of Dodge." The profanity intensifies as the speaker repeats, "Fuck y'all. Fuck you," intensifying the denouncement of the officers’ behavior or actions. Finally, the speaker emphasizes the outcome of the officers’ behavior with a blunt judgment about the aftermath: "Yep. And then just leave the carnage." The expletive-laden closing line, "Fucking assholes," serves as a final, emphatic condemnation of the masked police involved. Overall, the transcript presents a highly charged, swear-laden vent by Speaker 0 directed at masked police, criticizing their conduct, mask-wearing, and departure from a chaotic scene, while insisting on emergency response and denouncing the officers as negligent or inappropriate in their handling of the situation. The content focuses on anger toward law enforcement presence and action, without offering any evaluative commentary on its truthfulness or legitimacy.

The speaker, identified as Russia, recounts the events at the Capitol, insisting they did not break in: “We did not break in. We did not broke shit. They were Antifa.” He says they told the DC police, “there’s Antifa. Go get them,” but the police “did not move” and treated them “like we’re animals.” He describes the actions of the police as pepper spray, mace, and “rubber palette” used on people, including “two woman in the head,” “three kids, probably 17, 18” who were bleeding, and “two elderly people.” He claims a woman was shot and then thrown “by the stairs.” He repeats, “We did not break shit,” and asserts they identified Antifa to the police, saying, “Go get them.” Russia says it wasn’t MAGA people inside the building; he mentions doors were open and that Antifa had “a black chair, folding chair,” noting that if someone carries a folding chair, it’s a weapon. They say they pointed out Antifa to the cops, catching two people, and a woman talking to them told him not to bother the police and to “Leave the police alone.” He urges the police to choose a side, suggesting that without support they would be alone. He asserts: “The police saw them with a fucking black metal folding chair,” and adds that “They saw the brat boy following Antifa guy, and they did not do shit.” He states, “Don’t tell us we broke in. We did not break a glass.” He emphasizes that the doors were open and that it’s a federal building, implying “The police has no power on us. It’s a federal building. It’s our building.” Russia also reveals personal details: he came from Lebanon and fled because of the situation, intending not to raise his kids in that environment. He urges Asha to post a testimonial on Twitter and news channels. Asha interjects, claiming that “Black Lives Matter burned the country” and “burned the city,” while the police were ordered to back off and were not allowed to use tear gas, mace, or rubber bullets on them. They argue that in contrast, when the White House was entered and a church burned, Congress told Trump to let his people pepper spray them. The speakers express a sentiment of betrayal toward the police, stating, “Screw the police. They lost our support,” and claim that all will follow orders. They recount standing in front of Black Lives Matter to protect a cop, with a vow by Russia that if he sees a cop get shot, he would kill himself before saving him. The conversation ends with thanks to Asha and affirmation of her testimony.

Protesters in black, armed with hammers and bricks, clashed with police officers in riot gear using flashbang grenades and pepper spray near the inauguration route. Chaos ensued as officers sprayed pepper spray, affecting the audio technician. The scene was just outside the security perimeter. The speaker has anti-establishment views but does not condone the violence. Translation (if needed): Protesters clashed with police near the inauguration route, resulting in chaos and clashes with law enforcement. The speaker, who has anti-establishment views, does not support the violence.

Speaker 0 warns against entering a certain location. Speaker 1 discusses a video clip showing a broken window and the departure of the police. Speaker 0 clarifies that they heard the radio communication ordering the police to leave. Speaker 1 mentions an individual with red hair being confronted and identifies them as an undercover FBI agent. Speaker 0 confirms this and describes another clip where a crowd tries to enter the Capitol building. They mention being pushed and sprayed with pepper spray. Speaker 0 captures footage of an individual leaning against a doorpost. The transcript ends.

Speaker 0 encounters a woman who is causing trouble and tries to confront her. Speaker 1 questions Speaker 0's actions and asks why they are discussing the situation. Speaker 0 refers to the woman as crazy and believes she is trying to ruin their weekend. Speaker 1 tells Speaker 0 to leave the situation. Speaker 0 mentions a police officer arriving and expresses satisfaction with the woman's deserved consequences. They also mention that the situation could have escalated further. Speaker 0 believes the woman should be arrested.

Speaker 0 says they are hot and can't see the police lines. They tell others to keep their eyes open for Antifa, stating that Antifa is all over. Speaker 0 asks where Rico is and then says they see him. Speaker 0 asks if Trump is still walking here. Speaker 1 says "they're suiting up." Speaker 0 says that "they're gonna trap everyone in."

Speaker 0 admits to smashing a fire alarm but downplays its significance, stating it was due to being in a rush to vote. They take responsibility for their actions and believe that an investigation will resolve the matter. They confirm discussing the incident with Jeffries but do not elaborate on the conversation.

People in the video are urging others to screen record and break someone's window. They witness a person being arrested and express their disgust. They continue to encourage window smashing and express concern for the drivers being pulled out of their trucks. Finally, someone mentions Rebel news.

The speaker describes a situation where law enforcement tries to communicate with someone inside a building. The person inside fires a high-powered weapon, not flares, and law enforcement responds with nonlethal force. They shoot a shotgun at the windows and then reverse the truck. They try to communicate with the person again, but the person doesn't respond. Law enforcement attempts to break the front window, but then an explosion occurs, causing significant damage.

Two speakers recount a violent incident at a protest. The first speaker notes that they did not see the assault themselves, but mentions that “somebody has no video,” implying there was a lack of footage of the assault. Protesters then insisted that the individual who assaulted someone could not leave, and they began calling law enforcement to report the assault. According to the account, the situation escalated when a vehicle drove through the crowd. A Jeep Gladiator sped into the protesters, knocking one man quite violently onto the hood of the car. The vehicle then accelerated away, and the man on the hood was hurled into a snowbank. The incident continued as the car subsequently hit another person after the initial impact. The first speaker confirms that the driver sped off and notes that the person on the hood of the car went flying into the snowbank, describing the sequence as the vehicle “went flying into the snowbank.” They add that, after the initial contact, the car hit somebody, compounding the harm. The second speaker, identified as Speaker 1, reacts with shock: “Woah. I’m not in shock right now, so I might feel it later. I might feel it later. I don’t know.” This statement conveys an immediate emotional response to witnessing the violence, with an acknowledgment that distress may intensify as time passes. Overall, the account highlights an assault that occurred off-camera, followed by a deliberate act of driving a vehicle into a crowd, which resulted in a person being knocked onto the hood of the car, the vehicle continuing to speed away, and subsequent impacts that caused injuries. The protesters reacted by attempting to report the assault to law enforcement, and the witnesses express immediate concern and potential delayed shock regarding the violence they observed.

A journalist captured video footage at the Capitol showing two suspicious individuals dressed like government agents. One of them encouraged people to break a window and enter the building. The journalist warned against it, but one of the individuals was caught on camera pulling out a large pane of glass before dropping it upon realizing he was being filmed. He then blamed a protester for breaking the window and even threatened him. Surprisingly, the individual responsible for the criminal damage has not been charged. Another person can be heard on the video encouraging others to open the window further.

"Do not go in there." "What he captured were two most charitably called suspicious actors, but they are dressed in such a way that led him to believe that they were government agents." "Bobby Powell, who was the journalist that had shot it, he has his camera rolling, he told him that would be illegal, and that wouldn't be a good idea." "He warned people off not to go into that window, and then he turned his camera around, and he caught this agent or suspicious actor pulling a large pane of glass out, this tempered glass." "When he realized he was being filmed, he quickly dropped it." "His facial image is not on any of the sedition hunter sites or the FBI's most wanted site, but he clearly was committing criminal damage to property, and he has not been charged."

Radio journalist from Michigan at the Capitol captured 'two most charitably called suspicious actors,' who were 'dressed in such a way that led him to believe that they were government agents.' After a protester broke windows, one encouraged people 'to pull the rest of the glass out and go inside.' Bobby Powell, the journalist who shot it, had his camera rolling and he told him that 'would be illegal, and that wouldn't be a good idea.' He warned people off not to go into that window, then turned his camera around and caught this agent or suspicious actor 'pulling a large pane of glass out.' This tempered glass 'folds in into itself, crunch onto the ground.' When filmed, he 'quickly dropped it' and 'pulled in a protester and started blaming him.' 'What are you doing breaking that window?' 'The poor fellow that was being accused didn't know what's going on.' 'We don't know.' 'He clearly was committing criminal damage to property, and he has not been charged.'

In a brief, on-the-scene exchange, Speaker 0 asks a woman what happened to her. Speaker 1 responds that she was maced. The conversation reveals that she was attempting to go inside a cafe when the incident occurred: she had made it “like a foot inside,” then was pushed out, and they maced her. Speaker 0 continues by asking for her name and where she is from. In reply, Speaker 1 identifies herself as Elizabeth and states that she is from Knoxville, Tennessee. When asked why she wanted to go inside, Speaker 0 frames the moment by noting the surrounding activity, “We’re storming the Capitol. It’s a revolution. Thank you.” Elizabeth’s answer to the question about her motive is explicit: she says that she and others are involved in actions described as storming the Capitol, and she characterizes the situation as part of a revolution.

People are celebrating an accomplishment. They say, "We did this shit together," and "We took this shit." Someone broke a window. One person says people might burn something down, but it might be too late for that. They have knives. They don't want to see anyone get hurt and want to make a peaceful path.

Speaker 0 questions if Speaker 1 knew the crowd wouldn't react well to interference. Speaker 1 denies knowing. Speaker 0 mentions the "fuck around and find out" comment after a dumpster was lit on fire. Speaker 1 didn't witness it but tried to move the dumpster. Speaker 0 suggests the comment implies using a gun. Speaker 1 didn't witness and can't confirm. Speaker 0 withdraws the question.