reSee.it - Related Video Feed

New details suggest that the CIA, under Obama's administration, targeted Trump and initiated the Russia investigation. Former CIA director John Brennan identified 26 Trump associates to be monitored by the 5 Eyes Intelligence Alliance, and the FBI then targeted these individuals as suspicious. This led to the launch of the Russia collusion investigation. The operation's details were kept in a top-secret binder, which Trump has ordered to be declassified. There are rumors that the binder may be missing.

There is ample evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, with significant findings in the public domain. The president and his associates may be compromised by foreign powers, and there are persistent allegations of Russian money laundering through the Trump organization. While there is direct evidence of deception, it's important to note that there is no hard evidence of collusion at this moment. Circumstantial evidence exists, and it can be powerful. The Trump campaign welcomed Russian assistance, incorporated it into their strategy, and failed to report it, while also being deceptive about their actions. There is more than just circumstantial evidence, but specifics cannot be disclosed.

New details have emerged about how the CIA under Obama targeted Trump and initiated the Russia collusion hoax. Former CIA director John Brennan identified 26 Trump associates to be spied on by the Five Eyes Intelligence Alliance, which includes Britain and Australia. The interactions of these associates were then flagged as suspicious by the FBI, leading to the launch of the hoax. The evidence of this operation is reportedly stored in a top-secret binder, which Trump has ordered to be declassified. However, there are rumors that the binder may be missing. This revelation raises serious allegations of illegal spying and election interference. More information about the binder will be revealed in an upcoming report.

The video discusses a report revealing that the CIA and foreign allies spied on Trump's team, triggering the Russia collusion hoax. The mainstream media's lack of coverage on this important story is attributed to their loss of trust. The US intelligence community, including the CIA, allegedly mobilized foreign intelligence agencies to target Trump's advisers before the supposed triggering meeting. The FBI's investigation was believed to have started after an Australian intelligence official informed US officials, but it is now revealed that the US intelligence community initiated contact with the foreign agencies. John Brennan, the former CIA director, is implicated in this alleged coup to prevent Trump from becoming president. The video suggests that the media's strategy is to ignore these revelations.

Robert Mueller, a Republican and former FBI Director appointed by George W. Bush, is leading the investigation into Russia's attack on American democracy and potential Trump campaign collusion. The Trump campaign had numerous contacts with Russia, raising questions about potential collusion and crimes. Key questions include what Donald Trump knew and when he knew it. Mueller has secured guilty pleas from George Papadopoulos, who had contact with Russian proxies, and Michael Flynn, Trump's national security advisor, who admitted to collusion with Russia during the presidential transition and lying to the FBI. Mueller also has indictments against Manafort and Gates for money laundering and other offenses. Flynn's plea deal suggests he is cooperating, potentially leading to further indictments. It is critical for Americans to defend Mueller's investigation, the rule of law, and democracy. Peaceful protest is necessary to deter interference with Mueller's investigation.

New details have emerged about how the CIA under Obama targeted Trump and initiated the Russia hoax. It was previously believed that a tip from an Australian diplomat led to the FBI's investigation of Papadopoulos, but new reporting suggests that the CIA orchestrated the whole thing. Former CIA director John Brennan identified 26 Trump associates to be targeted by the Five Eyes Intelligence Alliance, and the FBI then deemed their interactions suspicious, launching the Russia collusion hoax. The alleged details of this operation are stored in a top-secret binder, which Trump has ordered to be declassified, but it may be missing. This is a serious allegation of illegal spying and election interference.

Michael Flynn pleaded guilty but later attempted to withdraw his plea and fluctuated between cooperating and not cooperating with the Mueller investigation. CNN reports that the president is considering a pardon for him. This would signal that if someone lies or covers up for Trump, they will be rewarded, but only if it serves his interests. This situation reflects poorly on American democracy and raises concerns about how the world perceives a president acting like an organized crime figure. This behavior is consistent with Trump's character from the beginning of his presidency to its end.

Fox News reports new information that appears to contradict the Biden administration’s stance that it had nothing to do with DOJ investigations into then-President Trump’s alleged retention of classified material and the Mar-a-Lago raid. Correspondent David Spunt notes emails obtained by Fox News show coordination between the White House counsel’s office and the DOJ regarding an interview of Walt Nada, a current White House aide to President Biden who was then a former Trump aide in Florida. Nada was later charged alongside Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith. The May 10, 2022 email reads in part: “coordination with DOJ and White House counsel are in work to start the process to confirm and interview current administration employee Walt Nada. This event is dependent upon the timeline of president Biden's brief decision and coordination between White House counsel and DOJ and, in turn, Evan Corcoran's position on the override of privilege assertion and whether or not he seeks an injunction to prevent access.” The email was written by an FBI agent and Evan Corcoran, one of Trump’s lawyers at the time. The report notes that August would mark four years since the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago. Following this, then-Attorney General Merrick Garland stated, “I personally approve the decision to seek a search warrant in this matter. Second, the department does not take such a decision lightly.” Reaction to the emails includes House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan stating, “it's always worse than we thought” and that the newly released documents confirm the Biden DOJ’s raid on Mar-a-Lago was politically motivated. Attorney General Pam Bondi weighs in, saying the more we learn about the DOJ weaponization under the prior administration, the worse the story gets. Bondi adds, “we will continue disclosing key evidence to our congressional partners to deliver the truth and bring those who committed crimes to justice.”

CNN has learned that US investigators have corroborated some of the communications detailed in the 35-page dossier compiled by a former British intelligence agent. The intercepts of foreign nationals confirmed that some conversations described in the dossier took place between the same individuals on the same days and from the same locations. However, it is important to note that the content of the calls or whether they relate to then candidate Trump has not been confirmed. The newly learned information does not pertain to the salacious allegations in the dossier. US intelligence and law enforcement officials have gained greater confidence in the credibility of some aspects of the dossier as they continue to investigate its contents. The White House has dismissed the story as "fake news."

In the video, Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia has been found. Speaker 1 mentions that information can be found in the report prepared by director Mueller, but they are not aware of any collusion or conspiracy. Speaker 0 then interrupts and states that when the FBI opened Crossfire Hurricane, they did not have any information suggesting that anyone in the Trump campaign had been in contact with Russian intelligence officials.

Russia hacked the election. President Trump still doesn't sound convinced. If he admits it, it casts a shadow on his victory over Hillary Clinton. Russia is doing it again now with election-related cyber hacking. The CIA, the FBI, the NSA, and 17 intelligence agencies all conclude that Russia hacked the election. If Donald Trump was colluding with Russia while they were hacking the election, that is completely impeachable. A dossier alleged a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian effort to hack the election. The director of national intelligence, the head of the National Security Agency, and the head of the FBI all say Russia hacked the election. To believe that's wrong, you have to believe they're all involved in an elaborate conspiracy to get Donald Trump.

Peter Alexander reports that former Obama administration officials confirmed President Obama warned President-elect Trump against hiring Mike Flynn during their meeting less than 48 hours after the election. This warning is significant, especially given Trump's recent criticisms of the Obama administration for hiring Flynn, who was later fired by Obama. Additionally, Obama cautioned Trump about North Korea. In another segment, discussions revolve around Stefan Halper, who received a substantial contract to study Russia and China, with implications that his work was subpar and potentially misallocated. There are claims of fabricated evidence and misconduct related to the investigation into Flynn, with assertions that it was an attempted overthrow of the government. Anticipation builds for the upcoming Durham report, which is expected to reveal more information on these matters.

Michael Flynn pleaded guilty for lying to the FBI. He understood the intel world and its funding, making him a threat. A political appointee felt pressured to change their assessment but refused. President Obama warned Trump to stay away from Flynn.

News alert discusses Tulsi Gabbard releasing a report alleging a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and U.S. intel agencies to undermine Donald Trump’s presidency and the 2016 election. The report claims there is irrefutable evidence that Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment they knew was false, promoting a narrative that Russia interfered in 2016 to help Trump win. Gabbard says she obtained a House Intelligence Committee report that had been locked away in a CIA vault for nearly a decade, and investigators spent over two thousand hours interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials. The assertion is that the Obama administration doctored intelligence to imply Putin and Trump colluded to steal the election, with a highly unusual, rush-developed assessment produced a month after Trump’s victory. John Brennan allegedly handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, who were siloed and not aware of each other’s work, with only one analyst in charge of drafting. The process was described as a rush job with no coordination with other intelligence agencies, essentially “home cooking” for Obama. The four key elements repeated in the assessment, forming the basis of the Russia hoax and the Mueller investigation, are: 1) that Vladimir Putin wanted Trump to win; 2) Putin took actions to help Trump win; 3) the Russians had blackmail on Trump (the Steele dossier); and 4) that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. The claim is that none of these were true, and there was no reliable intelligence to support them. Senior CIA officials allegedly refused to propagate these allegations, but were overruled by CIA Director Brennan and FBI Director Comey, who pressed for them despite lacking verifiable evidence. The report alleges the Obama administration cherry-picked intelligence, misquoted sources, did not corroborate claims, suppressed counter-evidence, and even used anonymous internet postings. Rank-and-file CIA personnel allegedly admitted that these actions violated tradecraft standards, with a pressure campaign emanating from political appointees, the CIA director, and Obama himself. Speaker 1 asserts that Donald Trump knows Russia helped him win in 2016. Speaker 2 suggests Putin’s preference for Trump came from his dislike of Hillary Clinton, who was running, while Speaker 3 states Russia sought to interfere systematically to advance Trump’s prospects. The conversation notes that at one point, 60% of Democrats believed Russia hacked voting machines to aid Trump, yet the report contends Russians aimed to create chaos and undermine faith in democracy, with solid intelligence indicating Putin had no clear preference between Clinton and Trump but had dirt on Clinton that was not released. The discussion questions why the dirt from the DNC emails and claims about Clinton’s health, including tranquilizers, were not leaked to aid Trump, and whether the information about Clinton’s health is credible. The panel suggests that if Russia sought to influence the election, more damning information would have been released. The speakers claim Obama and top intelligence leaders mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious sources to craft a narrative of Putin’s preference for Trump. They contend Obama continued pushing the hoax after the election, describing it as undermining democracy. Towards the end, there is mention of potential criminal implications, with references to referrals to the Department of Justice and FBI for investigation, including possible liability for Obama. A tester voices that Brennan may have committed perjury before Congress. A final note asserts that the CIA did not rely on the Steele dossier for the intelligence community assessment, countering a claim made in the discussion. The segment closes with a call for accountability.

New details reveal that the CIA targeted Trump associates, initiating the Russia collusion narrative. Contrary to the belief that an Australian diplomat's tip sparked the investigation, credible sources indicate that the CIA directed the Five Eyes intelligence alliance to spy on 26 Trump associates. This operation involved creating suspicious interactions that were reported to the FBI, leading to the collusion claims. A top-secret binder containing crucial information about this setup is reportedly missing, raising speculation about its connection to the FBI's raid on Mar-a-Lago. If this binder holds evidence of illegal spying and election interference by the U.S. intelligence community, it could represent a significant breach of political ethics in American history. Further details are expected in an upcoming report.

- Speaker 0 states they believe certain people are dishonest and crooked and that they may have to pay a price; they insist they are truly bad and dishonest people, and imply consequences may follow. - Speaker 1 discusses a criminal investigation into James Comey and John Brennan related to the so-called Russian collusion hoax, asserting they tried to ruin Trump’s life and that he prevailed. - Speaker 1 notes that for years, ranking members of Congress, the intelligence community, and the FBI claimed Donald Trump was colluding with Russia to win the 2016 election, and that this was continued through his first presidency. - Speaker 2 references emails suggesting Donald Trump Jr. was willing to collude with Russia, questioning how to know what happens when Trump and Putin meet, and suggests Trump’s repeated denials of collusion may have been truthful. - Speaker 3 asks if there has been any evidence of collusion, coordination, or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, and Speaker 2 disagrees, saying there is plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight. - Speaker 1 cites a recently declassified CIA “lessons learned” document from John Ratcliffe noting that the investigation was messed up, aimed at preventing Trump from winning and then hampering his agenda, and mentions multiple procedural anomalies in the preparation of the ICA (intelligence community assessment). - They walk through the timeline: Christopher Steele, a former MI-6 officer with Russian intel expertise, was hired by Fusion GPS, which was paid by Perkins Coie for Hillary Clinton’s campaign (notably Mark Elias) to produce opposition research on Trump; this unvetted dossier was used to bolster the case and was shopped to media to create a narrative of Trump-Russia ties, then used as a legal hook to push a narrative. - Speaker 1 argues Hillary Clinton leveraged influence to funnel the unverified dossier into the FBI and into a FISA warrant for Carter Page, noting it was not disclosed that the dossier was funded by Hillary Clinton, which they view as a major omission. - Ratcliffe’s document is cited as saying including the Steele dossier in the ICA undermined credibility and ran counter to tradecraft principles. - A second parallel element involved Natalia Veselnitskaya, a Russian lawyer paid by Fusion GPS and Clinton campaign, who met Don Jr. at Trump Tower; Don Jr. texted during the meeting that he was unsure what was happening, and the meeting was publicly used to support the Steele dossier claims about Trump’s ties to Russia. - The Speaker covers Hillary Clinton’s classified server issue, including the use of BleachBit and hammers, and notes DNC servers were hacked by Russia; they frame these events as being used to shift focus to Trump collusion. - They describe Crossfire Hurricane as the investigation into Trump, calling it an “insurance policy” to deflect attention from Clinton’s classified server issues and to portray Trump as guilty, describing the investigations into Trump associates (Papadopoulos, Carter Page, Manafort, Flynn) as efforts to keep the narrative alive even after Trump’s election victory. - Speaker 1 asserts Mueller’s appointment was scope-limited but later expanded, allowing broad access and substantial taxpayer cost; Brennan and Comey are accused of feeding initial information for a political purpose, with high-level agency involvement and misrepresentation in Congress. - They claim there was never any actual evidence of Russian collusion charged against the Trump campaign. - They mention Charles McGonigal, a former FBI counterintelligence official, as someone charged in connection with Russia, implying the broader narrative was invalid and asserting that those involved lied. - The speakers conclude that the entire setup was a scam and express a desire for accountability.

An individual accuses another of repeatedly presenting unnamed FBI agents' words as truth on their network, leading viewers to believe Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin conspired in 2016, which they claim is false. The other individual denies the accusation. They then state that President Trump went to extraordinary lengths to keep specifics about his meetings with Vladimir Putin secret, even from his own administration. They play a clip of President Trump responding to a question about whether he ever worked for Russia, where he calls it insulting but does not directly answer. The individual then asks if the president of the United States ever worked on behalf of the Russians against American interests.

We covered the Russia hoax constantly because the FBI was actively investigating it. We reported what unnamed FBI agents were saying. Any viewer would have believed that Trump and Putin conspired in 2016, but that was completely false. Trump went to extraordinary lengths to keep his meetings with Putin secret, even from his own administration. When asked if he ever worked for Russia, Trump responded that it was the most insulting question he’d ever been asked and the most insulting article ever written about him. He did not directly answer the question, which is a stunning turn of events. Did the President of the United States ever work on behalf of the Russians against American interests?

You continuously discussed the Russia investigation as if it were undeniable truth, leading viewers to believe in a conspiracy between Trump and Putin in 2016, which was completely false. President Trump has taken significant steps to keep his meetings with Putin secret, even from his own administration. When asked if he ever worked for Russia, he found the question insulting and did not provide a direct answer. This situation raises concerns about whether the President has acted against American interests.

President Trump's ally, the National Enquirer, accused Michael Flynn of being a Russian spy. Trump has a history of supporting the Enquirer and has a close relationship with its CEO. This could make Flynn nervous, considering Trump's frequent mention of the Enquirer. The Enquirer's attack on Flynn is significant because it aligns with Trump's past use of the publication to target his opponents.

Fox News alert: "the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, releasing a bombshell report today that shows a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect, Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election." The report states "there is irrefutable evidence ... directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false" and that it promoted "the contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true." Investigators spent "over two thousand hours" interviewing "20 CIA and FBI officials" and found "the Obama administration doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election." It cites "four key elements" and says "there was no reliable intelligence to support any of these allegations" while noting "senior CIA officials repeatedly refused" but were "overruled by Brennan and Comey." "This is how the Russia hoax was born." "The evidence ... point to president Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment."

Fox News alerts: Tulsi Gabbard releases a “bombshell report” alleging “a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect, Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election.” It claims “irrefutable evidence” that Obama directed “the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false” to promote a narrative that Russia interfered in 2016 to help Trump. A month after the win, Obama allegedly ordered CIA director to draft a new assessment; five CIA analysts were “handpicked” and siloed, a rush job “home cooking for Barack Obama.” The four elements cited: “Putin wanted Donald Trump to win,” “Putin took action to help Trump win,” “the Russians had blackmail on Trump” (Steele dossier), and “the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign.” It asserts none were true, with overruling by Brennan and Comey and that “This is how the Russia hoax was born.” It mentions criminal implications and accountability.

Some say this is a witch hunt, but they've caught a few witches. There have been a few indictments. One lawyer called the investigation absurd. But is it? We broke the story about the existence of the dossier and that President Trump had been briefed, but we didn't mention its contents. The FBI director was talking about prostitutes. Almost exactly two years ago, we reported that President Trump had been briefed on the intelligence community's assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 election, including the existence of the dossier. Despite the president's denial, the special counsel's team has already proven some of the claims in that dossier are true. Have Democrats found any evidence of collusion? Yes, we have. I just want the truth and facts to be respected again in this country.

An extraordinary moment unfolded between President Trump and President Putin amid the indictment of 12 Russian agents for election interference. When asked whether he believed U.S. intelligence or Putin, Trump expressed doubt about Russian involvement, stating he saw no reason to believe it was Russia. He praised Putin's offer to allow Russian officials to question the indicted agents with special counsel Mueller present. In response, U.S. intelligence chief Dan Coats issued a rare rebuke, reaffirming the assessment of Russian meddling in the 2016 election and committing to providing objective intelligence. Critics, including former CIA director John Brennan, condemned Trump's performance, calling it disgraceful and shameful for the presidency.

Revelations involving Michael Cohen raise serious questions about the president's legal exposure. The speaker says the president is nervous as time runs out to 'hold himself above the law.' The claim that 'the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians in trying to subvert the election' is highlighted, with Manafort and Trump Jr. meeting Russian agents who offered dirt on Hillary as part of the Russian government's attempt to help them, and 'it's clear that the campaign colluded.' Two developments are noted: 'the president's personal attorney lied to congress, but about the fact that he was personally involved on behalf of the president in arranging business deals with the Russians during the campaign.' And 'the president's campaign manager was involved with communicating with WikiLeaks during the 2016, at the time, you know, well before they served as a conduit to release the the emails that that the Russians'