reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A plot to cover up an attempted presidential assassination involving multiple agencies failed. To evade detection, the same company hired by the Democratic National Committee for Russian collusion investigation also serviced various governmental agencies. This allowed access to update code on servers used by the FBI and Department of Homeland Security, potentially aiding in covering tracks.

The speaker claims that top law enforcement officials expected Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election and manipulated the law to ensure her victory and Trump's defeat. He cites James Comey's alleged admission of operating in an environment where a Clinton victory was expected. The speaker discusses the alleged intrusion into the Democratic National Committee (DNC), pointing to "telltale signs in Cyrillic" and the name "Felix Dzerzhinsky" as either sloppy or overly clever attempts to implicate Russia. He alleges that the persona "Guccifer 2.0" is a fraud, based on forensic analysis of metadata by former NSA technical directors. The speaker criticizes Bob Mueller, claiming he falsified intelligence before the Iraq War and approved of torture and wiretapping. He recounts an encounter where he questioned Mueller about "parallel construction," the practice of using illegally acquired information in prosecutions without revealing its source. The speaker describes James Comey's leaking of a conversation with President Trump to prompt the appointment of a special prosecutor, Bob Mueller. He questions Comey's decision not to seize the DNC computers after the alleged Russian hacking, relying instead on CrowdStrike, a firm with a "disastrous record of veracity." The speaker claims that the DNC blamed Russia for the hacking to divert attention from the content of the leaked emails. He references Jennifer Palmieri, Hillary Clinton's PR person, allegedly pushing the "Russians hacked" narrative. Chuck Schumer is quoted as saying the intelligence community has "six ways to Sunday" to get back at Trump. The speaker discusses the Steele dossier and claims that the FBI also paid for it. He alleges that the intelligence community assessment on Russian hacking was based on handpicked analysts and that Obama stated the conclusions of Russian hacking getting to WikiLeaks were inconclusive. He claims NSA collects everything and there is no evidence of Russian hacking. The speaker references Peter Strzok and Lisa Page's text messages, where they expressed support for Hillary Clinton and a determination to "stop" Trump. He claims Strzok, who led the investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails, later said there was "no there there" regarding Russia gate. The speaker claims Julian Assange released documentation of the CIA's cyber tool to hack into systems and leave telltale signs giving the responsibility to someone else. He concludes that a "deep state" within the FBI, CIA, and Justice Department acted to ensure Hillary Clinton's victory and undermine Trump.

Last July, Trump's server conspiracy theory shifted from being blocked from the FBI to hidden in Ukraine. Trump asked the Ukrainian president for a favor regarding Crowdstrike before requesting an investigation into Biden's son. In November, Trump mentioned the server on Fox and Friends, questioning why it was given to a Ukrainian company. The FBI never obtained the server.

This video discusses the unsolved murder of Seth Rich, a young DC staffer who was shot in the back in 2016. The speaker questions the lack of investigation into the case and highlights suspicious circumstances surrounding the murder. It is suggested that Rich may have been the source of leaked DNC emails to WikiLeaks, which revealed bias against Bernie Sanders. The FBI is accused of hiding records related to Rich and delaying the release of information. The speaker raises concerns about the FBI's credibility and transparency, as well as the media's focus on the disproven Russia collusion narrative.

Seth Rich was asked to image the DNC server, which he did. The RNC was also hacked to frame Trump. Rich realized he was wrong and tried to expose it. He contacted Sean Lucas, who died soon after. Rich had portions of the DNC server. CrowdStrike investigated and blamed Russia. The Ukrainian president was asked for CrowdStrike servers. Many connected to the Russian dossier and impeachment. Trump was targeted.

The investigation reveals that the CIA framed Trump by manipulating foreign spies to target his campaign associates. Classified documents suggest Russia actually preferred Hillary in 2016, but the CIA, led by John Brennan, fabricated evidence to suggest Russian interference in favor of Trump. Brennan's manipulation of intelligence led to the false conclusion that Russia supported Trump. The CIA is withholding a 50-page report confirming Russia's preference for Hillary. Accountability for Brennan's actions lies with Congress, who must demand the release of these documents.

The speaker discusses an email mentioning Seth Rich, a DNC staffer who was murdered. The email refers to Julian Assange's claim that Rich was a WikiLeaks source and may have been killed for leaking DNC emails. The FBI denies specific involvement but admits awareness of the reporting. There is mention of squashing the inquiry, possibly involving a media outlet. The speaker questions why the FBI didn't investigate Rich's murder despite public suggestions of his involvement in the leaks. They compare it to the FBI's investigation into Donald Trump based on rumors. The speaker finds it interesting how the FBI decides what to investigate and the basis for their decisions.

A former Bernie Sanders supporter who worked for the DNC leaked information to WikiLeaks, exposing the rigging of the primary against Sanders. He was subsequently murdered. The speaker emphasizes that this is not a conspiracy theory, but a fact. They also discuss Julian Assange and the consequences of sharing information with WikiLeaks. The speaker suggests that the CIA wants Assange and controls various organizations to achieve their goals. They mention the possibility of more revelations related to Seth Rich and the number of people connected to the Clintons who have been killed.

A federal investigator told Fox News that Seth Rich, a DNC staffer murdered in July, contacted WikiLeaks through Gavin McFadden, providing over 44,000 emails. WikiLeaks then published DNC emails showing efforts to undermine Bernie Sanders, leading to resignations. Julian Assange alluded to risks faced by WikiLeaks sources, referencing Rich's murder. Some suggest Rich leaked the DNC emails to WikiLeaks and was killed because of it. The timing of the Fox News story, which was later retracted, coincided with the appointment of Mueller and the Comey firing, allegedly deflecting from the Russia investigation. It's claimed the FBI never investigated the DNC hack, instead relying on CrowdStrike. Some DNC members believed Rich was murdered for political reasons. One speaker alleges Hillary and Bill Clinton initiated a "civilian coup" by co-opting various government agencies. A "counter-coup" was allegedly initiated through Julian Assange and WikiLeaks by members of the intelligence community to undermine the Clintons and expose corruption. The speaker claims this was a peaceful effort to ensure a transition without pardons or acts of treason.

DNC staffer Seth Rich was murdered in July, and the case remains unsolved. Police initially reported it as a robbery gone wrong, but nothing was stolen from Rich. Private investigator Rod Wheeler claims Rich was in contact with WikiLeaks and provided them with DNC emails. Wheeler says a federal investigator saw an FBI report showing Rich transferred over 44,000 emails and 17,000 attachments to Gavin McFadgen of WikiLeaks before May 21, 2016. Twelve days after Rich's death, WikiLeaks published DNC emails. McFadgen died of lung cancer shortly before the election. Wheeler believes Rich's laptop holds the answers, but its whereabouts are unknown. The FBI denies having the laptop and refers questions to the DC police, who Wheeler says have been unhelpful. Another unusual death was that of former UN president John Ashe, who died from a crushed windpipe days before testifying with a Chinese businessman accused of funneling money to the DNC. One American News and others have offered money for information on Rich's murder, but the DNC has not offered a reward.

A Bernie Sanders supporter who worked for the DNC leaked information to WikiLeaks, exposing the rigging of the primary against Sanders. He was subsequently murdered. The speaker emphasizes that this is not a conspiracy theory, but a fact. They also discuss Julian Assange and the consequences of sharing information with WikiLeaks. The speaker believes that Assange is being targeted by the CIA. They mention the possibility of the Ecuadorian embassy being blown up and suggest that more information, like the Seth Rich case, will continue to come out. The speaker acknowledges that some connections to the Clintons may be coincidental, but believes there are many suspicious deaths associated with them.

The conversation centers on the Seth Rich murder and its alleged connection to WikiLeaks and the 2016 DNC email controversy. An FBI forensic report purportedly found that Rich contacted WikiLeaks through a London-based WikiLeaks director, Gavin McFadden, and Rich allegedly provided McFadden with more than 44,000 emails and nearly 18,000 attachments. Rich was killed near his DC home on July 10, but his wallet, phone, and watch were not taken. WikiLeaks published internal DNC emails twelve days later, showing top DNC officials discussing ways to hurt Bernie Sanders at the polls, which contributed to the resignation of Debbie Wasserman Schultz as DNC chair and the DNC’s top three officials. Speaker 1 questions whether there is an “October surprise” and whether material is being held. Speaker 2 of the Helix group states that they do not sit on material and emphasizes that whistleblowers take significant risks; they note Rich’s murder as an example of high stakes and risk to sources, asserting that sources seek anonymity with them. When Speaker 1 asks if Rich was a source, Speaker 2 declines to comment but says they are investigating what happened to Rich and are concerned about it, though no conclusion has been reached. Speaker 3 argues that Rich was a Bernie Sanders supporter who worked for the DNC and asserts that the DNC rigged the primary against Sanders; he notes that Rich was aware of this and was involved as it happened, with Donald Brazil also involved. He describes Rich as idealistic and patriotic, and recounts his murder after leaking information to WikiLeaks, insisting that this is not a conspiracy theory but a fact-based concern. He challenges others to acknowledge the alleged corruption within the Democratic party and suggests that those who ignore the facts are engaging in denial. He also critiques media portrayals and online accusations about his own credibility. Speaker 4 discusses Assange and WikiLeaks, criticizing the idea of a conspiracy theory and labeling Assange as a key figure who exposed corruption. He mentions that Assange now “works for Russia” and questions the Ecuadorian embassy situation, describing it as heavily manipulated by interests around Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation. He connects the Seth Rich disclosures to broader allegations of a coordinated effort to undermine Clinton and her circle, while acknowledging that some related claims may be questionable. Speaker 6 notes that hacking of the DNC and the role of CrowdStrike remain controversial and points to the subsequent murder of Rich as a focal point for questions that have not been fully explored by the media. Speaker 7 echoes concerns about the timeline, the FBI’s involvement, and past inquiries that were not pursued, emphasizing a sense that the case and the broader narrative around the DNC emails have been inadequately examined. Speaker 8 presents a long, conspiratorial narrative alleging that on 11/01/2016 Hillary and Bill Clinton orchestrated a civilian coup through corruption and co-option of key institutions, while a countercoup through Julian Assange and WikiLeaks was initiated to undermine Hillary and the Clinton machine. The speaker claims a silent countercoup across the Internet, led by members of the intelligence community, to stop the Clintons from gaining power and ensure Obama leaves without pardon, framing the moment as a major transitional event and a second American revolution conducted without guns.

A Bernie Sanders supporter who worked for the DNC claims that the party rigged the primary against Sanders. He leaked information to WikiLeaks and was subsequently killed. The speaker believes this is suspicious and points out other deaths connected to the Clintons. They discuss the Uranium One story, alleging that Bill Clinton received money from a Kremlin bank and that $142 million flowed into the Clinton Foundation. The argument that it was debunked is dismissed as bullshit. The money is seen as an attempt to buy influence.

Lindsay briefly shares information about Seth Rich, stating that she has been in contact with someone from Julian Assange's team who confided in her that Seth Rich leaked the DNC information. This contradicts the Mueller report's claim of a Russian hacker leak. Lindsay mentions that Seth Rich's murder remains unsolved and questions the robbery theory as nothing was stolen from him. She also mentions a judge pushing the FBI to release previously undisclosed pages. The host expresses interest in discussing the case further with a lawyer working on it.

CrowdStrike claimed the Russians hacked the DNC, but DNC data downloads occurred after this claim. The speaker submitted this evidence in court cases for Flynn, Stone, and Butowski, but was not allowed to testify. Guccifer 2.0's data postings had transfer rates unsustainable on the internet, suggesting intelligence agency involvement. Timestamps indicated manipulated data, with files separated manually from one download. Files with Russian fingerprints posted by Guccifer 2.0 were absent in WikiLeaks' Podesta data. This aligns with Vault 7's Marble framework, potentially pointing to CIA involvement. Within 24-48 hours of discovering Seth Rich's WikiLeaks involvement, a Russian storyline emerged, involving Guccifer and CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike's credibility is questioned due to their alleged failure to detect a Russian penetration for 42 days. The speaker suggests that if Seth Rich's murder is connected, the NSA would have known immediately about his involvement via their database. This information could have been reported and accessed by CIA, potentially implicating them. Imran Alwon, a Pakistani intelligence asset, ran DNC servers. Pakistani intelligence may have targeted Seth Rich to protect their compromised penetration. Kirk Weeby found a Pakistani address on the California Secretary of State's email distribution network, exposing the entire US election process to Pakistanis.

Speaker 1 believes the unsolved murder of Seth Rich should still be under investigation by the DC police or the FBI's counterintelligence unit. Speaker 1 suggests a possible motive involving Imran Awan, a Pakistani intelligence asset who allegedly controlled DNC servers and servers of several members of Congress. Speaker 1 believes Pakistan's ISI would have a motive to target Seth Rich, fearing he possessed information on his laptop that could expose Awan. Speaker 1 states the FBI's involvement suggests they had also been tricked by Awan, who was also an asset of theirs.

The speaker discusses the hacking of the DNC and mentions someone named Seth who allegedly provided information. However, the speaker does not reveal their sources. They believe that the files were not hacked by Russia but rather leaked from within the building. The speaker mentions Bill Binney, a former NSA officer, who supposedly demonstrated this. They also mention that lies about the hacking led to tensions with Russia. The speaker admits to initially dismissing the conspiracy theories surrounding the issue but later realized the truth. They express frustration with the lack of transparency and understanding surrounding certain actions and question the motives behind them.

Speaker 0 states that a federal investigator told Fox News that an FBI forensic report on Seth Rich’s computer showed he made contact with WikiLeaks through a London-based WikiLeaks director, Gavin McFadden, and that Rich provided McFadden with more than 44,000 emails and nearly 18,000 attachments. Rich was killed near his DC home on July 10; his wallet, cell phone, and watch were not taken. WikiLeaks published internal DNC emails twelve days later showing top DNC officials trading ideas on how to hurt Bernie Sanders at the polls, leading to the resignation of Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the DNC’s top three officials because of the apparent conclusions in those emails. Speaker 1 asks if there is an October surprise and whether anything is known about what is being sat on. Speaker 2 replies that WikiLeaks never sits on material, noting that whistleblowers take significant risks to provide material. He references a 27-year-old DNC worker who was shot in the back in Washington two weeks earlier for unknown reasons, insisting there is no finding that it was a robbery, and questioning what is being implied. Speaker 1 presses, asking if the murdered man was one of their sources. Speaker 2 declines to comment on sources, reiterating that the stakes are high in the United States and that sources face serious risks, which is why they come to WikiLeaks to protect their anonymity. He acknowledges the seriousness of the murder and says they are investigating what happened with Seth Rich, though no conclusion has been reached, and that a variety of WikiLeaks sources are concerned when such events occur. Speaker 3 contends that Seth Rich was a Bernie Sanders supporter who worked for the DNC and implies the DNC rigged the primary against Bernie Sanders. He asserts Rich was murdered after leaking information to WikiLeaks, describing Rich as a young, idealistic patriot who wore American flag attire, and argues that the murder is connected to corruption in the Democratic Party. He reflects on his own experience with online detractors and acknowledges flaws in many political figures; he asserts that it is rare to find someone who wants to be “the king of the world” and notes his own perceived lack of reputation. Speaker 4 contributes with emotion, insisting that Seth Rich was murdered and that the claim of a botched robbery is unfounded, listing inconsistencies (wallet, watch, phone left behind). He references Julian Assange and Russia, calling Assange the “darling of the left” when Obama was in office and later noting that Assange is stuck in the Ecuadorian embassy. Speaker 5 and Speaker 6 discuss broader context: Speaker 6 notes that the week WikiLeaks coverage happened on Fox News coincided with Mueller’s appointment and Comey’s firing, suggesting Fox pivoted from Russia stories to Seth Rich to deflect. Speaker 7 explains DNC data release timing, claiming FAT (file allocation table) formatting changed last-modified times on files, implying data was downloaded to a physical device before publication, suggesting an inside job rather than a Russian hack. Speaker 8 links the chain of events to the FBI, CrowdStrike, and questions about the investigation, alleging possible media silence and questioning why the murder case wasn’t more scrutinized. Speaker 9 recalls a private investigator’s work and notes that the FBI came to possess Rich’s laptop, with some at the DNC suspecting political motivation behind his murder; he asserts a media lack of follow-up. Speaker 10 presents a much broader claim: on 11/01/2016, Hillary and Bill Clinton allegedly orchestrated a civilian coup through corruption and co-optation, and a counter coup through Julian Assange and WikiLeaks was initiated by intelligence communities to prevent Hillary from becoming president and to indict Obama administration figures, describing this as a silent, internet-based counter coup and promising a peaceful transition without violence.

In early 2016, two Open Society Foundations officials allegedly held confidential talks with the Clinton campaign and the DNC, including Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Their objective was to promote the Trump-Russia collusion narrative and distract from Hillary Clinton's email and Clinton Foundation scandals. According to the transcript, Open Society executive Leonard Bernardo outlined a plan for strategic media manipulation using CrowdStrike, ThreatConnect, and Intel channels. CIA and FBI analysts reviewed the evidence and deemed the emails likely authentic. Despite this confirmation, the FBI allegedly did not follow through, allowing the trail to go cold. The speaker claims this was not a mistake but a cover-up.

Lindsay briefly mentions that she has been in contact with someone from Julian Assange's team who revealed that Seth Rich leaked the DNC information. This contradicts the Mueller report's claim that it was a Russian hacker. Lindsay also mentions that Seth Rich's murder remains unsolved, with no evidence of robbery. A judge is now pressuring the FBI to release previously withheld pages on this case. Tomorrow, they will discuss the matter further with Ty Claventure, the lawyer involved.

The transcript captures a discussion about Clinton-related death conspiracy theories and how these claims circulate in political commentary. Speakers repeatedly assert that “the Clintons have killed” a large number of people—well over 100, with an figure cited of about 130—arguing that such deaths are linked to the Clintons’ power and to foreign policy actions, including a bombing campaign in Iraq and a massive blockade around Iraq that, according to UN estimates, contributed to the death of hundreds of thousands of children. One speaker emphasizes that “the body count is about 130” and notes that people know the body counts, even if some refuse to acknowledge the implication that politicians might have people murdered. A recurring theme is that there used to be a Clinton Body Count website tallying people connected to Hillary and Bill who were said to have been secretly killed; one participant says Hillary should demand its return and that the record is misrepresented. The conversation frames this as a widely held belief rather than proven fact, acknowledging skepticism about the claims while insisting there is “a lot of very suspicious deaths around the Clintons” that are fair to bring up. The discussion then shifts to particular cases and figures associated with Clinton circles. Vince Foster’s death is described as a conspiracy theory that never produced evidence, but the idea lingers. The panel also references other individuals—Mary Mahoney, John F. Kennedy Jr., James McDougal, and Mark Middleton—along with the broader pattern of deaths that are framed as connected to the Clintons, though without definitive proof being established on many of the cases. In the case of Mark Middleton, described as a longtime Clinton adviser who allegedly facilitated Epstein connections, Middleton’s death is recounted with details: found dead after driving to a Heifer Ranch, with an elaborate scenario involving hanging and a shotgun, an autopsy described as unclear, and a family that disputes the notion of suicide. The family has sought to seal photos and footage, arguing that releasing them would fuel conspiracy theories. The conversation also foregrounds Seth Rich, a DNC staffer who was shot in Washington, D.C. The panel notes that Rich was connected to WikiLeaks and allegedly provided thousands of emails to WikiLeaks, with claims that Fox News reported an FBI forensic finding showing contact with WikiLeaks and the release of top DNC emails leading to the resignation of Debbie Wasserman Schultz. There is debate among participants about whether Rich’s death was a botched robbery, noting that his wallet and watch were left behind and his phone was not taken, and that claims of murder are contested by others on air. Julian Assange and WikiLeaks are discussed as adding to the conspiracy milieu: Assange raises questions about killings, offers a reward for information, and is described as “working for Russia now.” The panel references the broader political pinboard: the Clinton/DNC nexus, the FBI/CrowdStrike narrative about the 2016 hacking, and the media environment around Russia investigations and alleged election interference. There is a sense of ongoing investigation and uncertainty, with speakers insisting that sources face danger and that certain deaths remain unresolved or contested in public discourse. Toward the end, the speakers reflect on how reputations attach to candidates; they compare Clinton-related reputations with those of other politicians, asking how, over the last fifty years, the pattern emerges that people close to Clinton figures die, while noting that public perception often constrains open discussion of these claims.

Fox News alert: Tulsi Gabbard releases a report alleging a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election. There is irrefutable evidence detailing how Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment they knew was false, promoting a narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump win, selling it to the American people as true. Gabbard obtained a House Intelligence Committee report locked away in a CIA vault for almost a decade. Investigators spent over two thousand hours interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials, and it shows the Obama administration doctored intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. A month after Trump beat Hillary, Obama wasn’t satisfied with intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election. This was a highly unusual move. John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed; none knew what the others were doing, and only one analyst was in charge of drafting the report. It was not routine, and it was rushed to publish before Trump’s inauguration. Nothing was coordinated with other intelligence agencies. Basically, this was “home cooking” for Barack Obama. Four key elements were repeated to form the basis of the Russia hoax and the Mueller investigation: 1) that Vladimir Putin wanted Trump to win; 2) Putin took action to help Trump win; 3) the Russians had blackmail on Trump (the Steele dossier); and 4) that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. None of this was ever true; there was no reliable intelligence to support these allegations. Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations, but were overruled by CIA director Brennan and FBI director Comey, who insisted they be pushed without verifiable evidence. The Obama administration cherry-picked intelligence, lied about sources, misquoted sources, did not corroborate claims, suppressed intelligence counter to their narratives, and even used anonymous Internet postings. Rank-and-file CIA admitted violations of tradecraft standards; a massive pressure campaign came from the top, with unusual directives from political appointees, the CIA director, and Obama himself. This is how the Russia hoax was born. Donald Trump knows that the Russians helped him win in 2016. Putin hated Hillary Clinton, with a noted preference for the opponent he disliked least. It was Russia in a systematic effort to interfere in the election and advance Trump’s prospects. The report notes that at one point, 60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked voting machines to help Trump win, but the report shows Russians sought to create chaos and undermine democracy; solid intelligence suggested Putin had no preference, and expected Hillary to win, holding compromising dirt on her that he never released. If Putin wanted Trump to win, why didn’t he drop the dirt? There were high-level DNC emails detailing Hillary’s psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and a daily regimen of tranquilizers; Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious sources to create a narrative of Putin’s preference for Trump, though Obama and intelligence leaders knew Putin did not collude with Trump and did not direct his people to help Trump win, yet they published it anyway. Obama and his intel spies purportedly cooked intelligence to look like Putin preferred Trump, undermining faith in elections and causing chaos. Do you believe this implicates Obama in criminal behavior? There is a referral of documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate criminal implications. Evidence points to Obama leading the manufacturing of the intelligence assessment. Even two years after the election, Obama pushed a hoax he knew wasn’t true. Brennan, Comey, and others may have liability. Trey Gowdy claims Brennan committed perjury for lying to Congress. When asked who commissioned the Steele dossier, responses indicate the CIA did not rely on it; it was not part of the intelligence community assessment. The broadcast concludes with the assertion that what happened to these officials is not revenge, but accountability, while noting ongoing questions about potential criminal action.

DNC staffer Seth Rich was murdered in July, and the case remains unsolved. Police initially reported it as a robbery gone wrong, but nothing was stolen from Rich. Private investigator Rod Wheeler claims Rich was in contact with WikiLeaks and provided them with DNC emails. Wheeler says a federal investigator saw an FBI forensic report showing Rich transferred over 44,000 emails and 17,000 attachments to Gavin McFadgen of WikiLeaks before May 21, 2016. Twelve days after Rich's death, WikiLeaks published the same number of DNC emails. Wheeler believes the answers are on Rich's laptop, but its whereabouts are unknown. Wheeler also stated the DC police department was unhelpful and told to stand down. Another unusual death was that of former UN president John Ashe, who died from a crushed windpipe days before testifying with a Chinese businessman accused of illegally funneling money to the DNC. Some believe the Clinton Foundation is a "lawless pay to play enterprise." One American News and others have offered money for information on Rich's killer, but the DNC has not offered a reward.

Hillary Clinton paid for a server linked to Ukraine. The FBI didn't get the server from DNC, giving it to a Ukrainian company instead. President questions why this happened, suspecting corruption. He wants to know why millions are given to corrupt countries.

The FBI's politicized hacks aimed to bring down Donald Trump, with the help of Hillary Clinton's campaign. The report revealed that Trump's political opponents provided leads for the investigation, relying on a fabricated dossier. While we reported on this, other media outlets downplayed it. Unfortunately, there were no consequences for those involved in the Crossfire Hurricane operation. In fact, they were emboldened and repeated their actions in 2022, this time protecting Hunter Biden.