reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker expresses indifference towards the conflicts among people and mentions the impact of 9/11, which made them realize the existence of trouble. Another speaker shares their experience of being asked about militant Islam in the 1990s and how they wrote a book in 1995, warning about the West's lack of understanding and the potential destruction caused by militant Islam, specifically mentioning the World Trade Center.

Hamas invaded Israel on October 7th. Speaker 1 admits to not being well-informed about the situation and feels unqualified to comment. They express uncertainty about the accuracy of the information they have seen.

The speakers discuss a conspiracy-style interpretation of Istanbul’s Hagia Sophia and surrounding monuments, arguing that mainstream history conceals a far more advanced, interconnected underground world. - The first speaker repeatedly promotes the idea that My Lunch Break explains a truth “mainstream history” hides. They allege Hagia Sophia is a mathematical, sacred-geometry structure built with perfect whole-number ratios, untouched by irrational numbers, and that its age and purpose are misrepresented by official timelines. - They claim 2013 ground-penetrating radar (GPR) studies by a team from Istanbul Technical University found a three-chambered vault crypt connected to cisterns, water channels, and tunnels requiring diving gear. After the initial findings, further scans were allegedly blocked by authorities, with the Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism and the Hagia Sophia Museum Directorate restricting exploration beyond the central nave. They question why permission was denied if history were as taught. - The narrative asserts that underground networks connect Hagia Sophia to other ancient sites, including the Basilica Cistern, Topkapı Palace, and a broader “underground palace” complex. They present Medusa-head pillars as evidence of this underground world and describe an interconnected system of tunnels and chambers beneath the area. - The speakers insist that the underground network demonstrates a vast, lost civilization and an “old world” whose palaces and foundations survive beneath today’s surface structures. They claim the Basilica Cistern is part of the same underground network and that the surface structures (Hagia Sophia, Sultanahmet Mosque/Blue Mosque, and a third nearby mosque) are actually components of a single, larger plan—four domed structures built on the same foundation, connected by tunnels. - A central claim is that the commonly cited construction histories—such as Hagia Sophia’s May dating and the rapid, sequential building of successive structures with donkeys and minimal tools—are false. They argue all four palace-like buildings on the same site were built in a coordinated fashion by the same group of people in a way that contradicts the mainstream timeline, with the same materials, designs, and dimensions. - The presenters urge openness of radar data to the public, contending that the underground palaces, tunnels, and chambers are real and extensive, and that many discoveries were either concealed or misrepresented. They posit that Istanbul is not part of our known timeline and that the area contains a larger, multi-structure palace complex that extends well beyond what is publicly acknowledged. - They reference a broader pattern of altered histories globally, including similar stories of early, short construction periods, and implausible timelines, suggesting that the old world’s palaces once occupied a much larger footprint than officially recognized. They speculate about other underground structures beneath major cities and promise to continue exploring Istanbul’s subterranean network in future episodes. - Throughout, the presenters emphasize a belief that the surface landmarks are just the visible parts of an extensive, ancient, and interconnected underground metropolis—what they call the “Subterranean palace”—and urge viewers to examine the evidence with an open mind, asserting that the current timeline is incomplete or misleading. They conclude by claiming a unifying footprint connects all beneath-Istanbul structures.

The speaker recalls a conversation about going to war with Iraq. They question the reason behind it and inquire about any evidence linking Saddam to Al Qaeda, but there is none. The speaker later learns about a memo outlining plans to attack seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and ending with Iran. When they ask if the memo is classified, the person confirms it is. The speaker mentions bringing up the memo again in a recent conversation, but the person denies ever showing it to them.

The speakers discuss the possibility of offensive jihad if Muslims were to become a majority in Great Britain. They emphasize the importance of having enough authority and power to implement Sharia and take authority away from those who currently hold it. The concept of power is repeatedly emphasized throughout the conversation.

One of the most significant discoveries in history was finding the Library of Ashurbanipal in Iraq. The city was supposedly destroyed by fire, which baked and protected many clay tablets until they were found. These tablets, including the Epic of Gilgamesh, were taken to the British Museum in London, but are largely off-limits to the public under the guise of preservation. I believe this is to protect a fabricated narrative. The Vatican has 53 miles of texts and artifacts from a previous advanced civilization hidden from the public. The British Museum is hiding millions of Old World items. They claim they want to protect the artifacts, when instead they are protecting the narrative. The museum director, Nicholas Cullinan, could change this, but UK laws and the board of trustees may be a problem.

The speakers discuss the blame for the current situation in Israel. Speaker 0 suggests blaming the Bush administration, but Speaker 1 disagrees. Speaker 1 explains that the Clinton administration's proposal to Arafat and the Palestinians had provisions and catches, and negotiations continued until they were aborted. Speaker 1 also mentions the lack of serious engagement in the peace process during the last 8 years. Speaker 0 admits to being superficial and asks Speaker 1 to educate him. Speaker 1 clarifies that Arafat did not walk away from the proposal and negotiations continued, but the process eventually got aborted. Speaker 0 acknowledges Speaker 1's knowledge and mentions the collective standards of the international community.

Speaker 0 claims that someone is trying to make them feel unrivaled. Speaker 1 mentions pictures of terrorists and children being circulated. Speaker 1 also reports that CNN cannot confirm the claim of babies being beheaded, but there are reports of Israeli children being kidnapped. Speaker 0 accuses someone of playing the victim and standing with the oppressor. They mention reduced reach on posts and the importance of finding the truth. The situation is described as lacking electricity, food, money, and fuel.

The speaker expresses a deep curiosity about Jewish history and the land historically linked to them, noting a fascination with Judea, Palestine, and the Holy Land, and asking why the world is obsessed with the Jews. To explore, they turn to a set of historical sources and describe them in some detail. First, they discuss Flavius Josephus, presenting him as a Jewish historian born in 37 CE who died in 100 CE and who wrote pivotal works. They mention an 1872 print that contains his biography, Antiquities of the Jews, and Wars of the Jews, and they summarize the scope of these works—from Antiochus Epiphanes taking Jerusalem to the death of Herod the Great—and note that Josephus lived during a period involving the massacre of innocents associated with the tyrant who ordered it in Matthew. They describe Josephus as someone whose life included being captured by the Romans in 67 CE, with his release allegedly tied to his prediction of the election of Thespian as emperor, and they present opposing views about him: some think he was a Roman plant, others think he was a great historian. Next, they reference History of the Jews, volume three from 1866 by Henry Hart Milman, described as a doctor of divinity and professor in England. They express particular excitement about this volume because it contains information on the Essenes, an obscure religious sect associated with Jesus, noting that the Essenes are described as persecuted by the Romans and whose origins remain obscure. The speaker then reflects on the broader question asked at the outset: why is the world so obsessed with the Jews? They mention having seen a color map of Palestine in the Bible and wonder whether the narrative twisted history, suggesting Palestinians might be dying as the “plant” (likely referring to a perceived occupying power) rules the world. They acknowledge that a hundred and fifty years ago, they intend to investigate further with sources like Josephus and Milman to uncover answers and plan to put these works online for others to read. Throughout, they reiterate that they are not suicidal and emphasize that they have nothing against the Jews—only a strong curiosity, noting the old adage that curiosity killed the cat.

Speaker 0 argues that the Temple Of Baal in Syria is more than crumbled stone; it is a haunting reminder of a dark side of a previous civilization. He notes a castle on a cliff next to the site, claiming it has been melted into sand and suggesting both structures were built by the same group in the same period. He asserts that the Temple Of Baal was found in 32 AD, and that the site is inaccessible today due to war, which he views as a tactic to hide history. He contends the Temple and the castle were constructed around the same time, framing the location as an old world city or palace city, not thousands of years ago but closer to our timeline, largely destroyed to look older. Speaker 0 mentions Tadmer Castle, listed as a world heritage site in danger in 2013 because of the Syrian civil war. He states the castle was captured by ISIS in 2015 and recaptured in 2016. He describes ISIS retreating and blowing up parts of the castle, including the stairway, causing extensive damage. He claims the arch near the site was demolished in 2015 and asserts it was an attack on true history to obscure what happened there. He notes Palmyra and the Damascus Gate in the vicinity and argues the history presented by mainstream sources is a lie, pointing to an “advanced group” that left behind technology and construction that mainstream narratives hide. Speaker 0 rejects the idea that the Temple Of Baal and surrounding structures were built thousands of years ago. He speculates that a higher level of civilization was present in the last few hundred years and that their work remains visible today, with attempts to destroy or blur the past. He cites the Temple Of Baal as one of the most important temples in the ancient Near East and references Baal worship in modern Syria, clay tablets, and biblical mentions. He presents archaeological excavations at ancient Baal worship sites, including Palmyra, as evidence that sacrificial activity occurred, challenging the notion that such myths are purely mythical. He notes bones and texts confirming ritual activity and questions why such evidence would be hidden if myths were the whole story. Speaker 0 discusses a location about 200 miles from the Temple Of Baal where tablets and artifacts were unearthed in 1929, including the Ball Cycle, a collection of epic poems related to Baal worship. He emphasizes the discovery of 1,000 tablets and suggests there may be more, with many stories hidden beneath the surface. He claims the site has been affected by conflict, making the extent of damage to tablets unclear, and asserts that authorities downplay or conceal information to maintain the mainstream narrative. He contrasts the focus on pottery with reports of royal palaces, high priests’ libraries, and temples, arguing that more significant finds were suppressed or underreported. Speaker 0 invites viewers to consider what other stories might be found beneath the surface, pointing to the Ball Cycle and the alleged opposite practices under churches. He stresses that the past, including the old world, is not Mythical in his view, and he promises to continue the investigation in future episodes. He closes by urging viewers to remember the pottery as a possible distraction from more substantial discoveries, and he signs off with anticipation for further exploration.

Speaker 0 presents a detailed, continuing exploration of ancient sites, focusing on the Hypogeum in Paola, Malta. He notes the Hypogeum is an enormous subterranean structure excavated about four thousand five hundred and twenty-four years ago, lifting huge blocks of limestone. It was discovered in 1902 during construction, with 7,000 elongated skulls found, most destroyed, and remaining ones hidden from the public. He points out that some underground chambers appear cut to imitate the architecture of above-ground megalithic temples, including false bays and windows, underground windows, and a ceiling feature described as “one ring of carved stone overhanging the one below” to imitate a roof. He questions whether the structure was originally above ground and buried during a cataclysmic event that killed the inhabitants, arguing that the mainstream view as a burial site does not fit the evidence of immediate death or entrapment. He asserts a global pattern of civilizations being buried or hidden beneath the surface after massive events, citing that the original structure could have melted or been altered, and presents this as part of a broader claim that the old world remains buried beneath modern layers. He then shifts to Italy, describing the Hypogeum of the Valumnus family, uncovered in 1840 near a road excavation, with about 200 tombs and a site thought to date to the second and third centuries BC. It features ten rooms and two winged demon guardians at the entrance. He mentions urns painted with scenes, including griffins, and ties this to Tartarian theories, suggesting mythic beings and Greek myth figures were real in the past. He shows photos showing changes over time, including items removed from rooms and walls, implying that discoveries have been altered or stripped as roads and modern interventions occurred. He argues that the underground world contains a hidden history yet to be revealed and laments the loss of artifacts. Speaker 0 then turns to Syria, continuing the Hypogeum topic with the Hypogeum of Yarhei, an underground tomb timeline misrepresented as January 2007/2009, and claims it was originally located in Palmyra’s Valley of the Tombs before being excavated and restored, moved to Damascus in 1935, and later placed in a national museum. He recounts an AI correction episode about the date of discovery (1933) and the move (1935), insisting that the true timeline is being obscured. He surveys Palmyra today, noting extensive destruction of a vast old-world temple complex, including the Temple of Baal, the Temple of Dagon, and a monumental arch. He references Gertrude Bell’s 1900 description of Palmyra’s grandeur and argues that many columns, temples, and palaces remain under the surface or were destroyed to erase the past. He highlights the Temple of Baal as a massive site, comparing its size to the Great Pyramid of Giza, and claims additional ancient sites nearby—such as a castle on a cliff—were melted and turned to sand. Speaker 0 condemns reconstruction narratives as inadequate and asserts ongoing efforts to hide evidence of an advanced, previously unknown civilization. He mentions the destruction of temples in 2015 (Temple of Baal Shemin and related arches) and argues that such acts are designed to erase true history. He concludes by emphasizing that thousands of tablets from Palmyra were found in 1929, including the Baal Cycle and other texts, and suggests that what is presented publicly is incomplete or deceptive. He ends by urging viewers to remember the pottery and anticipating more discoveries, noting the broader implication that the past is far more complex and veiled than commonly acknowledged.

The speaker argues that a hidden, “old world” civilization built thousands of monumental structures around the world, and that today’s timeline erases or suppresses this past. The narrative centers on Mumbai (formerly Bombay), India, where a number of grand buildings—palaces, train stations, a municipal corporation building, and other architectural icons—are claimed to be remnants of a prior civilization with advanced technology. The speaker asserts that these structures, built long before the known timeline and power tools, were attributed to a cover story in which modern-era builders and a younger designer are named as front men. Key examples cited include: - A palace-style central railway headquarters in Mumbai that, according to the speaker, was completed seven years before the invention of the power tool in 1888, contradicting the official timeline. - The idea that multiple grand buildings in Mumbai, such as the Royal Alfred Sailor’s Home (allegedly built by Frederick William Stevens, a British government employee), the Municipal Corporation Building (designed by Stevens and completed in 1893), and other palatial residences, were constructed by a highly advanced earlier civilization. The speaker emphasizes consistent reuse of “the same character” and “pin” tying Stevens to various buildings, including Raj Mahal and other structures. - The claim that a modern city like Mumbai contains evidence of old-world technology (e.g., precision domes, depictions of mythic sea creatures) and that interior spaces of these sites hold further undisclosed discoveries. - Assertions that the Gateway of India predates its stated foundation date, with a photograph from 1911 showing the structure before the claimed foundation, and that construction actually began in 1915, contradicting official records. The architect George Widdett is named as the designer of several Mumbai landmarks, including the Prince of Wales Museum (now CSMVS), supposedly linking a consistent “old world” design language across sites. The speaker expands the scope globally, linking these Mumbai findings to a worldwide pattern: - The old world is suggested to have left “palaces” and “stone universes” across continents, including references to griffin sculptures and other mythic imagery appearing on buildings, implying a shared old-world iconography. - A claim that the old world is being erased from history, with statues of British figures removed in the 1950s in India, and other steps described as deliberate erasure of the past. - The Gateway of India is contrasted with a supposed cardboard-model explanation for its 1911 photograph, and the assertion that this narrative is part of a broader cover story masking the true extent of ancient achievements. - The speaker highlights a broader historical thread: the Sumerian king’s list, Dilmun, and the idea of a land of immortality described in ancient texts. The Sumerian list is portrayed as a historical roadmap to a paradise-like Dilmun, cited as evidence of an advanced old world. Dilmun and related artifacts appear at the center of the argument: - The Dilmun site and its seals are presented as crucial evidence, with references to near 400 Dilmun seals discovered across Bahrain and the Gulf, showing intricate carvings and griffins; these artifacts, the speaker claims, are housed in Bahrain’s National Museum and in the British Museum. - The Dilmun burial mounds and alleged artifacts described as remnants of an advanced civilization, including a supposed “land of immortality” where people did not die or get sick, are presented as part of a broader narrative about the old world’s geography and technology. - The speaker discusses the 1954 excavations near Dubai, arguing that the discovery of Dilmun and related tablets preceded Dubai’s rapid modern growth, and suggests a correlation between the discovery and later monumental investment in Dubai. The speech asserts a political-cultural dynamic: - The British Museum, the Vatican archives, and other global repositories allegedly hoard 30,000 tablets from Iraq and approximately 53 miles of texts under Vatican City. The tablets, the speaker claims, are off-limits to the public, and the narrative is protected by those who control access, with the argument that public display would reveal a truth about humanity’s past. - A 1963 British Museum Act is cited to question the ability to remove artifacts; the speaker implies unlawfully acquired items (stolen or unjustly obtained) could be returned to their rightful owners, arguing that the tablets and artifacts should be accessible to the public. Throughout, the speaker calls for confronting what is presented as a globally coordinated effort to conceal the true history of the old world, urging viewers to question commonly accepted timelines and to seek the hidden science, texts, and sites that supposedly prove a prior advanced civilization operated across multiple regions. The overall claim is that the old world did not vanish but remains encoded in monuments, inscriptions, seals, and archives, and that much of this material is deliberately hidden from public view.

Speaker 0 discusses Cypress’s Tombs of the Kings as part of a large necropolis on the island, describing it as a UNESCO site and a discovery first reported in 1783 with archaeology beginning in 1870. The speaker notes that this is not just “tombs of the kings” but a vast necropolis from the old world, with the implication that it reveals an advanced previous civilization still located beneath modern life. They claim that through extensive research and exposure, people can conclude that these sites are "right underneath our feet" and connected to many other necropolises across Cyprus. The narration emphasizes a pattern: excavations in the 19th century, with skepticism about earlier historical accounts, and asserts that many details about the tombs were lost over time. The speaker contends that the tombs were rich in expensive goods and old-world technology, and accuses mainstream narratives of grave robbers and cover-ups, claiming that bodies have been removed or lost due to looting or destructive restoration practices of the 19th century. They allege that remains have been taken for study or looting, leaving only a few intact burials today, and that the sites are often left inaccessible or destroyed to protect a narrative. The speaker highlights that adjacent to the Tombs of the Kings are catacombs and other necropolises, including a Western Necropolis, and argues they are interconnected. They point out that many catacombs repurposed as Christian places of worship undermine the notion that these were solely ancient burial sites. The claim is made that access is restricted next to the Salamis Necropolis and that information and mapping of the underground network are not provided to the public, suggesting that the network is much larger than publicly acknowledged. There is a repeated assertion that the “old world” civilization existed and that the pottery explanation for finds is a front to conceal what was discovered. The Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974 is cited as having led to greater looting of the Salamis Necropolis, with artifacts allegedly smuggled out during and after the conflict. The speaker connects Cyprus’s necropolises with other regional sites, including Palmyra in Syria, claiming proximity and interconnected significance and asserting that these sites reveal a true history that contradicts standard education. The episode repeatedly argues for full transparency and public access to excavations from start to finish, accusing authorities of protecting or preserving a narrative rather than the actual past. The speaker mentions that the necropolis excavations began in the 1950s for some sites and ties ongoing looting and restricted access to broader patterns observed in other “old world” sites. They conclude by noting that thousands of individuals were originally buried there and indicate anticipation for episode 111 next Saturday, promising further revelations about the ancient network and its looted heritage.

Speaker 0 explains that once goals are achieved, Americans understand that “we’re real partners.” Speaker 1 reinforces: “Real partners.” Speaker 0 contends that what has to be done is to have alternative routes instead of going through the choke points of the Hormuz Straits and the Bab El Mandeb Straits in order to have the flow. Speaker 1 prompts: “Wait for it.” Speaker 0 continues: “Just have oil pipelines going west to through the Arabian Peninsula To where? Right up to Israel, right up to our Mediterranean. There” Speaker 1 interjects: “you have it.” Speaker 0 asserts that the real objective of all of this was to intentionally—“they knew that starting a war with Iran would cause a shutdown of both the Bab El Mamdab Straits, which is what the Houthis can affect in the Red Sea, and then the Strait Of Hormuz, which Iran has effectively shut down.” He states that they knew that would happen because their long-term goal has always been to force the Muslim countries in the Arab states, the Gulf Arab states, to route all of their oil exports through Israel. Speaker 1 adds: “Therefore, Israel can now control up to 40% of the world's petroleum. And that amount of control would absolutely make them a superpower, and that's exactly what they want.” Speaker 0 goes on to say that if Iran falls, it’s not going to be Turkey next; it’s going to be Egypt because they have to take back the Suez Canal. He notes that Egypt had control during the Arab-Israeli war for a brief time, but the UN forced them to give it back to Egypt. He emphasizes that they have always wanted that back. Speaker 1 contributes: “Because if they can control the Suez Canal and take that away from Egypt and they can force all the Gulf states to run all their oil through Israel. Israel controls the world, and that's their ultimate objective. That's the objective of this war.”

Speaker 0: The speaker discusses content from the Catholic Catechism and a separate critical perspective on Islam. They cite that the Catholic Catechism states the church's relationship with Muslims is part of the plan of salvation, and that Muslims acknowledge the creator, with the first place among whom they are included being the Muslims. They quote: “They profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us, they adore the one merciful God.” They then promote a small comic book called The Prophet by Jack Chick, noting it is available from their ministry for about $2. The speaker uses The Prophet to claim that Catholics started Islam. According to this view, Catholics “started the whole religion,” purposely to recover the holy land for the Catholics. The narrative claims Catholics built up Islam, funded Mohammed, trained him, and even sent a Catholic nun out of a monastery to find a young promising Muslim, marry him, and train him to raise an army of Arabs to take back the holy land for the mother church. The speaker acknowledges this as an interesting story to read if someone wants to explore it further. They assert that it began to work, but eventually Islam grew so large that the Catholics were abandoned by Muslims. The speaker concludes with a generalization, stating that the current global Muslim population—now estimated by the speaker as “10%, 20% of the world population”—is largely unaware that “they really started off as a front for the Catholic church.”

In this exchange, Speaker 0 raises the issue of the USS Liberty attack in 1967, arguing that if truth matters, the Israeli government must be held accountable because the American flag was flying on that ship. Speaker 0 presses why, in a discussion of modern Israeli–American relations, Speaker 1 would deem the attack “irrelevant” to current ties. Speaker 1 responds that when assessing today’s relations, citing the 1967 attack as a basis for judgment is irrelevant—comparable to using evidence from World War II or 1776 to define present-day relations with Britain or Germany. He emphasizes that while the attack was horrible and tragic for those involved, and that Israel paid reparations, the actual naval record indicates the incident was a mistaken and tragic event. He notes that those who reference the USS Liberty often do so to suggest Israel deliberately harmed America, and asks if that is Speaker 0’s broader point. Speaker 0 reiterates that truth requires accountability from the Israeli government, given the American flag on the ship. Speaker 1 points to the naval investigations, stating that multiple investigations exist and that the Israeli military at the time was flying Mirage planes and the USS Liberty was operating off-grid. He explains that the Israeli forces mistook the ship for an Egyptian vessel and believed it was shelling Al-Arish, which was not true. He describes the sequence: the American flag was knocked down in the initial attack, the engagement lasted about ninety minutes, and once it became clear the vessel was American, the attack was halted and a ship was dispatched to assist the Liberty. He also notes there have been other unfortunate friendly-fire incidents in war, such as during the Gulf War when US forces killed British troops. Speaker 0 asks about the broader agenda behind raising the incident, suggesting that it is not limited to that specific event. Speaker 1 acknowledges the question but questions the motive and implies that it is not an appropriate basis for evaluating current U.S.–Israel relations. Speaker 0 asserts that there are ongoing problems in the relationship, but again emphasizes the six-decade-old incident as relevant to the discussion. Speaker 1 maintains that, in the same way that many histories exist, there are many countries and contexts, and reiterates that the question is not answered satisfactorily. The exchange ends with Speaker 1 indicating this will be the last question.

We’re told we’ve found over 40 cisterns beneath this location in Istanbul, with the ground described as effectively hollow. The presenter asserts there is a “master planned grid” below the streets and structures, now turned into museums or restricted to the public in the last century. Every cistern, tunnel, or substructure is described as part of an underground blueprint, not just water reservoirs. The host contends that the popular claim of a massive 2,100,000-square-foot palace is incorrect or incomplete; instead, what’s visible today is the basement, while the underlying old world remains. He references episode 33 from 2023, noting a huge golf course next to the stadium and surrounding hotels that supposedly cover ancient remains, suggesting the area could be built over old world buildings. He also cites Balboa Park observations of a land layout described as a perfect square with 90-degree angles, arguing that such cuts are used to hide what lies beneath. The Cistern Of Ayatou(s) (Aiatus) is presented as directly beneath the VEFA Stadium, with the playing surface roughly where the cistern floor was and the enclosing walls aligned with cistern walls. The stadium was built in the 1920s, just before the city’s name changed from Constantinople to Istanbul. The host claims that the cistern they refer to as Ayatouz covers an area of four by 85 meters or approximately 223,000 square feet, over what would be three NFL football fields, and that the grass does not fully cover it because the cistern goes down 13 to 15 meters (roughly 43 to 49 feet)—describing it as a four- to five-story underground building. He asserts this was a “massive destruction project” in the 1920s and 1930s, not a simple covering. Breaking news is announced mid-episode: the stadium is being demolished at the time of posting, with the presenter promising to investigate further. He zooms in on a side wall showing bricks and questions why such structures would be demolished if truth were being told. He argues that old world structures have been destroyed globally over the last two centuries as a means of hiding the underground, and references a 1958 photo showing the outer wall that allegedly encircles the ancient palace. The host introduces the Ipek Badrum Cistern as situated below Children’s Park, with photos from the Nichols v. Artmanov collection and William Earl Bech of Dumbarton Oaks, suggesting these images confirm underground chambers. He insists the old world is beneath the ground and that history books are “completely made up stories.” He claims that since the name change (from Constantinople to Istanbul) in the early 20th century, a deliberate effort has occurred to destroy old world sites, with the cisterns connected or only partially buried. Also mentioned are other underground cisterns near the area, including the Cistern Of Aspar and the Phloxanos Cistern, all described as having similar shapes and features, with Medusa heads visible in some. The presenter asserts there are 64 known cisterns in Istanbul, with 26 dated by mainstream construction dates, and he vows to expose them as interconnected, ancient underground structures, all part of a single vast palace beneath the city. He ends by positing that this isn’t unique to Istanbul; underground palaces and hidden corridors are present worldwide, and their existence is being buried and not taught to the public.

The speakers discuss the situation in Gaza, with one person claiming that hospitals have been turned into Hamas bunkers. They argue that Hamas is responsible for the civilians being trapped and that if they want to save lives, they should surrender. The other person challenges this claim, stating that no intelligence reports or governments have confirmed the hospital as a bunker. They emphasize the need for evidence and express skepticism about the claim. The conversation ends with the assertion that the truth will be revealed after the war.

The video discusses the library of Ashurbanipal in Iraq, noting that it held an estimated 30,000 clay tablets discovered in the 1800s, and that the current state says the site no longer houses the tablets. The narrator asserts that the city was destroyed in the year negative six hundred twelve, and that the fire destroyed or baked many tablets. They claim the fire narrative has been exposed, and describe February fires as part of a broader pattern. The video emphasizes that the tablets found in Iraq in the 1800s were then taken to England, where the British Museum houses the majority of them, and that this represents a location that will unlock further knowledge. The narrator references a prior episode claiming the Vatican has 53 miles of texts and artifacts from the old world beneath Vatican City, described as off-limits to the public, hiding true history. They state that the 30,000 tablets from Iraq were moved to England and are not publicly accessible, described as “off limits to the public” in order to preserve a narrative rather than preserve the artifacts. They contend that “the true narrative is not being shown to us,” and describe this as part of a long-standing operation since the eighteenth hundreds, with the claim that many texts are kept in archives, available only to researchers or by special request for preservation reasons. The video asserts that thousands of tablets, including the Epic of Gilgamesh and possibly How to Live Forever, were shipped to England under the pretense of protecting them, and that “they are stealing the artifacts. They are not protecting them. Again, protecting the narrative.” The narrator asks who is allowing access and suggests the museum director has the authority to grant or deny access, naming Harwig Fischer as a previous director who resigned after missing items from the museum, including gold jewelry and precious gems. They note that Nicholas Cullinan became the director as of March 2024 and question whether he has the power to reveal the tablets, given oversight by the board of trustees, the prime minister, and an outside firm, and referencing the British Museum Act of 1963. Key legal point: the British Museum Act of 1963 defines how artifacts can be managed and prohibits removing items from the collection except in specific circumstances. The Act is interpreted by the narrator as allowing return of items that were unlawfully acquired or stolen, and as supporting the idea that these tablets should be accessible and not hidden. The narrator claims that 7,920,000 items from the Old World are not on display, and that the museum contains about 1,000 staff and over 8,000,000 objects, with only 1% on display, suggesting vast materials are hidden from public view. The video closes by reiterating the claim that 53 miles of books in the Vatican and 30,000 tablets in England are off-limits, and asks whether the public will ever be invited to see these artifacts to understand humanity’s past.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a pattern of alleged hoaxes surrounding so-called ancient or “old world” buildings in the United States, arguing that documented records do not exist to support the histories commonly taught. - The conversation centers on the Hoffman Tower in Lyons, Illinois, described as a tower that supposedly belongs to a park and was built in 1908 by a named construction company. The speakers claim there should be construction documents proving this, but they contacted the Village of Lyons and were told there are no blueprints or receipts for the building or the later staircase destruction in the 1990s. The village reportedly has “nothing on the building, period. Case closed. Nothing at all.” This is presented as evidence that the Wikipedia account is false and that no historical records exist to back up the claimed construction. - They assert a broader claim that “the history that we’ve all been told” since childhood is a lie, and they repeatedly state that multiple buildings in the area were not built as described. They reference years of researching and receiving the same response from officials: no documents, ledgers, or load-bearing calculations exist for these structures. - The discussion then moves to Lamont, Illinois, noting that a school in Lamont replaced an earlier one and again lacks supporting documents in the speakers’ view. They posit that the story about the 1836 school and subsequent building is likely AI-generated history and argue that the replacement school shows modern architectural features incongruent with the eighteenth- or nineteenth-century period. - They discuss a nearby historic Limestone Village Hall in Lamont, pointing to a stark contrast between a 1900s photo and the renovated present-day building, including the removal of the bell tower and bells. They claim bells were removed and melted into coins and cannons, referencing the Liberty Bell as an example of “cracked from overuse,” though they say historians are uncertain when the initial bell split occurred. They show sadness or outrage at what they view as erasing historic features during restoration. - The Altgeld Hall Chimes Tower at the University of Illinois is brought up, with a 2023 exploration referenced. They claim a restoration involved removing the bells and that this building’s historical state was captured in Episode 36 of their channel, but that the current project completely changes the building’s appearance. They describe 2024 renovations starting with a 3,000-pound bell and show before-and-after photos to illustrate perceived destruction of the “old world” building. - The speakers conclude by returning to Lamont, noting a nearby palace-style church (Bethany Lutheran Church, built in 1895) and contrasting it with the local housing, implying the church represents an architectural anomaly. They insist such “palace” constructions and “old world” features did not take place as claimed, arguing that the narrative of buildings being erected rapidly in a single year (multiple times referenced) is false. - They reference a recurring question about the authenticity of the architects and suggest that the supposed architect TJ McCarthy, who allegedly built these structures in a single year with self-taught expertise, might not be a real person. They propose that these towns contain interconnected tunnels or connections to other old world buildings, and question whether the architects were real individuals, given the lack of verifiable records. - Throughout, Speaker 1 emphasizes a view that “these stories … lied,” pointing to England’s Big Ben as another case where records are missing, and contends that many historic buildings worldwide from the 17th and 18th centuries were found without proper documentation.

One of the most significant discoveries in the history of the world was finding the library of Ashurbanipal. The British Museum in London houses the majority of these tablets, but they are not available for public viewing, as they are preserving the narrative. We have exposed this and proved that this is the case 100%. We have located two places that hold basically everything that we need to know and are being blocked off from all of us, they are off limits to the public. They are stealing the artifacts and protecting the narrative, so that they get to keep all the old world technology, the old world text, the old world information, and all of it is off limits to all of us. The museum is also home to 1,000 staff and over 8,000,000 objects, where just 1% of these items from The Old World are on display to the public.

Speaker 0 argues that the Cathedral of All Saints, Big Ben, the Field Museum, Philadelphia City Hall, the New York Public Library, and Emmanuel Church in LaGrange, Illinois all lack their original blueprints, making it impossible to verify that these structures were constructed as claimed. He asserts that their narratives are uniform across countries and time, claiming they were built in a short period, followed by a mysterious fire, and replaced by untrained individuals who never build again. He says these buildings, though publicly funded, have blueprints that “staff can see,” and that no blueprints have ever been provided to him or his team despite repeated requests. He states that in the last 10 episodes they have escalated the research to a live audit, exposing the narratives and pressuring institutions to reveal blueprints and ledgers. Speaker 0 describes using FOIA requests as a new weapon, pressuring governments to respond legally, and notes that responses so far have been poor. He references a formal request to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) for the blueprints and supporting documents for Federal Hall in New York City (the US Custom House), built under the US Treasury Department and completed in 1842. He quotes NARA’s reply: a search of the cartographic branch’s architecture master list found no responsive records, with three drawings from 1905 for the US Custom House in New York City, dated 63 years after the building’s completion, and no other references to the US Custom House in NYC. He emphasizes that those 1905 drawings are not construction records and questions their relevance. Speaker 0 expands his critique to the US Capitol Building, noting that the master list shows only 1935 documents (10 pages of sketches) for a project begun in the 1790s, which he says are nontechnical and not construction records. He claims these sketches demonstrate that “the master list” is an internal receipt, effectively empty of authentic construction documentation for the Capitol. He concludes that the federal architectural records for the Capitol are absent for the original construction period and suggests that similar gaps likely exist for other capitol buildings in the U.S. He asserts seven verified instances where credible records are missing and that this undermines mainstream history, calling for eight if the Capitol is confirmed. Speaker 0 then recaps findings regarding the New York Public Library, stating that the library claimed only staff could view blueprints and that originals were fragile, later claiming they are not available to the public because they are not processed or conserved yet. He describes this as contradictory and accuses the library of lying about access and availability. He notes that the New York Public Library has not provided the researcher with any documentation and suggests other institutions are cooperating, while the New York Public Library is not. Throughout, Speaker 0 reiterates the intent to reveal the truth, asking for viewers’ reactions and inviting further discussion, while signaling plans to continue pursuing master list verification and FOIA responses. He also mentions that this is episode 159 of “my lunch break.”

Speaker 0 defended the Palestinians and Speaker 1 clarified the situation. They disagreed and ended the conversation.