TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

President Obama authorized the first use of the auto pen signature to sign an extension of the Patriot Act while in Europe. The auto pen is a mechanical pen. Congressman Tom Graves, a Republican from Georgia, is asking the president to confirm that he saw the bill before authorizing the auto pen. Reports say the White House planned to fly the bill to the president, but it would have reached him after the midnight deadline.

"A ringleader, 28 year old illegal Brazilian national, Cesar Augusto Martin Riaz, admitted to conspiring to secure driver's license for over a thousand ineligible applicants." "More than 600 licenses were approved before the scam was unraveled." "Two ninety days time served." "Riaz charged $1,400 per head." "When Bedford police pulled Riaz's over and found 50 counterfeit driver's license in his car." "Time served, all thanks to this judge, Margaret R Guzman, and she was appointed by no other than Joe Biden." "Imagine living in a state where if you are an American citizen, nobody cares about you, but if you're an illegal alien, we have people like this in the office protecting every single one of them." "How many of those drivers license are still on the road? How many are operating in your state? How do we find that out?"

The committee is investigating the validity of executive orders and laws, questioning who authorized low-level staffers to sign Joe Biden's name on documents, especially when he was not present at the White House. They cite the Hur report, which concluded Biden couldn't remember dates of his election or family events, suggesting he may not have been mentally fit to make these decisions. The committee aims to determine who gave the authority for these executive orders and pardons, given concerns about Biden's cognitive state, particularly after his debate with Donald Trump. They question the reports from physician Dr. O'Connor, who stated Biden was mentally fit, which they now believe to be untrue.

Mike Howell, president of the Oversight Project, testified that FOIA is inaccessible to most Americans. The Oversight Project was launched in 2022 to fill the void left by ineffective congressional oversight. To that end, they have filed over 100,000 FOIA requests, sued the federal government almost 100 times, and procured over 1,000,000 pages of government documents. The Oversight Project's FOIA requests and litigations have revealed information on controversial scandals. Examples include proving Secretary Mayorkas knew the "whipping" narrative was false, obtaining records on the US Marshals Service interpretation of 18 USC 1507 after the Dobbs leak, and suing US Attorney David Weiss for his lack of independence in the Hunter Biden investigation. They also procured documents showing FBI agents who kneeled with BLM rioters were later promoted and exposed the partisan application of President Biden's Executive Order 14019. The Oversight Project is suing the DOJ for the audio recording of President Biden's interview with Special Counsel Hur. They also released an investigation that discovered the Biden White House made prolific use of an auto pen device to sign pardons and other presidential documents, which led to President Trump declaring those pardons to be null and void. Howell stated that the organization sends a high volume of targeted FOIA requests because agencies frequently deny or significantly delay overly complex requests. He concluded by stating that Congress should update the statute to make it more accessible to the everyday American.

Hidden Camera footage shows Ed Markey's special assistant bragging, 'fucked up,' while driving the senator home, and mocking Markey's wife as a Karen. He claimed that white people are afraid of him because he's a black n word, saying, 'Dude.' He added, 'I feel like he had a brunch or something. I was torn.' 'He didn't know though. I'm black. Even white people scared of black people.' He further stated, 'Karen's scared of black. No way. I'm a I'm a nigga. Okay. I'm a black Karen. Okay. I can do this.' The probe notes Markey's aggressive stance against Tesla autopilot—'the senator often doesn't even sign his own name without his autopilot'—and that 'Markey claims Tesla's autopilot is making the roads more dangerous.' The assistant alleges the senator was 'fucked up' while driven, and that his boss 'didn't even know.'

Pen that can do that. Right? Look at that, Pam. Is that a good signature? Seriously. Is that a good signature? Who can who can write like that? Nobody. I assume we're looking at the whole auto pen scam, sir, because the person that ran it said he spoke to briefly twice about nothing. That means that all those partners that he gave to some very bad people, very unpatriotic people, very evil people, it looks to me like those partners are are worthless. Because number one, you shouldn't use an auto pen very specifically. And they have to know that the president wanted it. The president didn't want this. The president didn't know he was alive. Okay? He never approved any of this stuff. He wasn't for open borders and all of the other thing. He was never for open borders. I've known Biden a long time. He was never very sharp, but he was never in favor of open borders and all of the other things he did to destroy our country. Let's go. Lastly, sir, this is an executive order on flag burning.

Speaker 1 believes there's an open legal challenge regarding the use of an AutoPen for pardons. The typical AutoPen approval process requires signatures from at least five people, including attorneys, policy makers, and the president. Speaker 1 claims President Trump stated that there are no records of these required signatures, and it's unknown who used the AutoPen. Speaker 1 agrees with President Trump that this is a problem. Speaker 1 suggests testing the legality of the pardons by indicting someone who received one.

Biden auto pen thing was Payola. People were paying for pardons. New revelations from the New York Times about Joe Biden and the auto pen scandal. According to New York Times, mister Biden did not individually approve each name for the categorical pardons. Rather than ask Biden to keep signing revised versions, his staff waited and then ran the final version through the auto pen, which they saw as routine. Jeff Zients, former Biden chief of staff, three minutes later, hit reply all and wrote, 'I approve the use of the auto pen for the execution of all of the following pardons.' The final list reportedly included Fauci. 'cash for clemency deal' and 'three people controlled access, and they were making money off of it.' The House Oversight Committee has brought in a number of former Biden aides to speak about this, and this will drive a wave of questions.

Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch discusses allegations against ActBlue, including Elon Musk's claim that it funds groups behind demonstrations against Tesla. Fitton notes ActBlue's leadership changes and questions whether they knowingly accepted illegal foreign donations. He characterizes actions against Tesla as potential terrorist activity targeting a federal official. Fitton dismisses Reid Hoffman's claim of not being able to control where all his money goes, alleging shared values among those involved. He recalls "billions of dollars" that appeared after Harris took over the nomination and suggests a criminal investigation into ActBlue's fundraising practices. He links supporting terrorists abroad with domestic terrorism. Fitton also addresses concerns about Joe Biden's executive orders potentially being signed via auto pen, raising questions about the legality and who was truly running the White House given Biden's "cognitive decline." He criticizes the lack of media scrutiny on Biden's staff and suggests Republicans should have investigated the possibility of invoking the 25th Amendment.

I believe it was Florence who said that none of us think our signatures are consistent enough over time, especially since getting our driver's licenses. While some senators have shown interest in the process, there seems to be a lack of media attention and interest from the minority party.

The Biden White House is under investigation regarding the use of an "auto pen" to sign documents, with Trump now calling Biden "the auto pen." Bondi's team is investigating Biden's competence and whether others exploited him, questioning if he knew what he was signing, including 8,000 pardons. The investigation was launched after Ed Martin made an announcement at the Department of Justice. The Heritage Foundation found that many documents with Biden's signature used the same auto pen signature. The auto pen was first used regularly by President Truman for simple tasks, but Obama used a portable auto pen in Europe to sign major legislation. The question is whether Biden directed someone to sign his name or if aides had free rein. Speaker Johnson suggests Biden was out of the loop. One source claims a top Biden aide may have misused the auto pen, while David Sacks alleges Elizabeth Warren controlled it. If Biden didn't approve its use, it could be forgery. Some believe Biden wasn't running the country, while others insist he was engaged and gave directives. Jake Tapper's coverage of Biden has prompted CNN to cover the auto pen investigation. Some suggest Democrats should abandon their current machine and rebuild. There's a divide within the Democratic Party between "team restraint" and "team resistance."

Speaker 0 contends that a large number of pardons were issued by the auto pen on the final day of the Biden presidency, and asserts there is no record showing that Joe Biden participated in the authorization of those pardons. The speaker claims that these pardons include notable examples such as those for Dr. Anthony Fauci, members of the Biden family, Adam Schiff, the January 6 committee, and an extensive list that the speaker describes as continuing at length. The core assertion is that every one of these pardons was signed with the auto pen and there is no evidence that Joe Biden was personally involved in the decision-making process behind them. According to the speaker, the absence of Biden’s involvement in the decision-making is a key element of the argument, and the implication is that this absence of direct participation should be recognized in legal terms. The speaker further states that these pardons could be declared null and void by the Department of Justice. The underlying claim is that there is a basis for such a nullification rooted in the way the pardons were issued, specifically the use of the auto pen and the lack of documented presidential involvement. The speaker also asserts that the ongoing investigation will produce evidence that will support the DOJ’s decision to void the pardons. In this framing, the investigation’s forthcoming findings are presented as capable of reinforcing the claim that the pardons were improperly issued or improperly authorized due to the absence of direct presidential action. The overall narrative presented is one of procedural challenge to the pardons, anchored in the asserted method of issuance (the auto pen) and the supposed lack of Biden’s participation in the process. The speaker emphasizes a sequence in which the pardons, if deemed void, would be reversed or nullified by official action from the Department of Justice, with future investigative evidence expected to validate that outcome in court.

Speaker 1 believes there's an open legal challenge regarding the use of an AutoPen for pardons. The typical AutoPen approval process requires signatures from at least five people, including attorneys, policy makers, and the president. Speaker 1 claims President Trump stated that no such signatures exist and the origin of the AutoPen use is unknown. Speaker 1 agrees with President Trump that this is a problem. Speaker 1 suggests testing the legality of the pardons by indicting someone who received one.

The transcript centers on a heated discussion about President Joe Biden’s health, cognitive fitness, and who was calling the shots within the White House during his presidency. Key points and claims raised include: - The campaign and public discourse about the president’s fitness or age were prominent, with questions such as “Was the number one issue in the campaign the president's fitness or his age?” and assertions about visibility, including whether “you ever see president Biden in a wheelchair?” While some speakers note aging and physical signs—“I noticed that, you know, he shuffled more,” and “he has more stumbling over words and gasps than he did” — others maintain confidence in his capabilities, claiming he was “on top of things” and that “his mental acuity is great. It's fine. It's as good as it's been over the years.” - There are allegations of a cover-up by insiders. The narrative asserts “new information now on the people in his inner circle and how the cover up actually operated,” with “Senior aids that worked here until just a couple months ago, the beginning of this year, manipulating an ailing president for their own gain.” A figure asks, “How much were you paid for your role in the campaign in 2024?” with the response “Just a little bit short of $4,000,000.” The implication is that financial incentives influenced actions. - Internal discussions about the president’s decline and how it was handled are described as ongoing. “The official word from Biden world about all these new stories is that nothing has been revealed this week that shows that president Biden was anything but effective president.” There is mention of a senior-level discussion about whether the president should have a cognitive exam. - Testimony from Annie Thomas Seen, former senior adviser to Biden, is presented as significant. She “has now taken the fifth,” and the transcript notes “There is now a pattern of key Biden confidant seeking to shield themselves from criminal liability for this potential conspiracy.” She invokes the Fifth Amendment when asked about being told to lie about the president’s health. - There are explosive claims regarding Hunter Biden’s role. One speaker says, “Hunter was driving the decision making for the family. He was almost like a chief of staff.” There are references to an uptick in activity when Hunter Biden was around, and discussions about pardons for Hunter, with the line “Yes. Were you in favor of Hunter Biden getting a pardon?” indicating support for clemency. - The “auto pen” controversy is described. Speakers discuss whether the president’s name was “hand signed” or “auto pen” used for documents, with questions such as “Did he hand sign all executive orders?” and claims that “the auto bin” or “auto pen” was used and that some believed others may have instructed staff to use it. There is mention that some staff “did not know who was operating the Obalon/auto pen,” and that “an executive order” and “memo” details existed but were not definitively known to those questioned. - Media portrayal and public perception are addressed. Some speakers accuse the legacy media of denial about cognitive decline, while others defend the president’s sharpness, noting that this debate is framed by evolving video and audio coverage, including discussions of “cheap fakes” versus real footage. - Additional context touches on Medicare drug price negotiations as a policy objective, with a line about “the ability of Medicare to negotiate drug prices with big pharma,” and the belief that “if we finally beat Medicare” would be a significant achievement. There are repeated assertions that those who knew and understood cognitive issues took control, implying a broader conspiracy. - Throughout, witnesses emphasize that their statements are contextualized within interviews and testimony, with ongoing questions about who was directing the White House and the true state of the president’s health and decision-making.

The speaker alleges a serious issue involving "auto pen pardons." They claim it was a "cash for clemency deal," where staffers exploited a "bogus legal system" to process pardon forms. The speaker believes these forms were then auto-penned, resulting in undeserving individuals being released, while someone profited from the scheme.

FEC data reveals that some senior citizens across the US are listed as donating thousands of times per year, with some allegedly linked to over $200,000 in contributions. I'm James O'Keefe with OMG in Annapolis, Maryland, investigating these claims. I went to people's houses to ask them about these donations. I spoke with one man who told me to ask Donald Trump. I spoke to Cindy Noe, whose records indicate she donated over a thousand times to ActBlue in one year, totaling almost $19,000. She said she only donates $5 occasionally. Another individual was listed as making 18,000 contributions totaling $170,000, which they denied. I called Garland Riggs, who was listed as making over 31,000 contributions. He denied this. I encourage you to knock on doors and ask your neighbors if they've donated to ActBlue or Biden for President and if they know how many donations were made in their name.

Trump accused Biden's staffers of treason, alleging they took over the White House while Biden was senile and unaware. Claims suggest staffers were selling pardons and using an auto pen to sign bills and executive orders without Biden's knowledge. Mike Johnson questioned Biden about cut off natural gas, to which Biden seemed clueless. Whistleblowers claim Biden was unaware of policies enacted in his name. Ben Hur stated Biden was too senile to stand trial regarding classified documents found in his garage. The speaker believes Democrats expected Biden to die in office and hand power to Kamala Harris, but Biden's continued survival is disrupting their plans. Investigations are underway regarding the staffers, auto pen usage, policies, and executive orders. Ed Martin leaked information that several of Biden's staffers have lawyered up, suggesting wrongdoing related to illegally signed pardons. The speaker asserts widespread corruption and deception among Democrats in the White House.

The Biden White House is under investigation regarding the use of an "auto pen" to sign documents, with Trump now calling Biden "the auto pen." Bondi's team is investigating Biden's competence and whether others exploited him, questioning if he knew what he was signing. Concerns arose over last-minute pardons, with signatures appearing identical, suggesting auto pen use. The Heritage Foundation found consistent auto pen signatures on Biden's documents, except for the announcement of Trump dropping out of the race. While Truman used the auto pen for simple tasks, Obama used a portable one to sign major legislation. The Justice Department allows auto pen use if the president approves the decision. Speaker Johnson suggests Biden was out of the loop, with claims that a top aide misused the auto pen, possibly Elizabeth Warren controlling it to target crypto. If Biden didn't approve the auto pen use, it constitutes forgery. Questions about his competence are also raised. Jake Tapper's coverage of Biden prompted CNN to cover the auto pen investigation. MSNBC is critical of CNN's focus on Biden's mental acuity. Joy Reid says Comcast was worried she would blame the Jews. The Democratic party is divided between "team restraint" and "team resistance" regarding Trump.

The House Oversight Committee is expanding its investigation into Biden's alleged mental decline, interviewing five members of the Biden administration and deposing former physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor. Chairman James Comer stated that they are serious about the investigation, especially regarding the use of an auto pen to sign executive orders and pardons. Comer said that President Trump has waived executive privilege, and if witnesses don't answer questions or show up for interviews and depositions, they will be held in contempt of Congress. The committee aims to discover who authorized the use of the auto pen, especially since many documents were signed while Biden was supposedly at the White House. Comer believes there was a cover-up of Biden's mental decline and that Anthony Bernal, former chief of staff to Jill Biden, was a major part of that inner circle.

The discussion centers on the legality and appropriateness of Joe Biden's use of an autopen, particularly concerning pardons. It's claimed that the Trump administration believes Biden's autopen use may be unconstitutional if he wasn't fully competent or if others used it on his behalf. A former US attorney claims to have contacted senior Biden officials early on regarding Biden's competence and the pardons, receiving some responses. The speaker argues that incompetence could invalidate contracts and pardons, even though the pardon power is plenary. He alleges a whistleblower from the 2020 Biden campaign identified three "gatekeepers"—Clayne, Anita Dunn, and Bob Bauer—who controlled access and potentially profited from it. While not yet verified, this information is deemed potentially scandalous. The speaker clarified that he contacted the Biden family and others in the US attorney's office.

During the Biden administration, attempts to obtain records on funding for Wuhan research were blocked; findings came largely from FOIA challenges. Communications allegedly show Fauci and NIH director Francis Collins instructing: 'read this, this is some more crap coming from me, the senator from Kentucky, I wanna be done with this. When you're done reading it, delete this material.' The speaker says this is illegal and constitutes two crimes: destroying federal records and lying to Congress. The auto pen pardon raises questions about Biden's awareness; the operator says he never met the president, and 'thousands of auto pen pardons' were issued. The speaker has invited Fauci to testify; if not accepted, a subpoena will be issued. They claim Fauci lied to Congress and that gain-of-function research was funded by the United States government with Fauci's approval. Kennedy, Bhattacharya, Makary cooperative. End deadline for Fauci's response is this week or next.

The speaker believes the government thinks Americans are too stupid to research executive orders. They were under the impression that executive orders signed by Biden were his own. They were also unaware that Trump signed executive orders that benefited the country, minorities, women, children, and border protection, but that Biden revoked them soon after taking office. Biden falsely claimed he lowered prescription costs and capped insulin, when Trump did it first. Trump signed an executive order called Safe Policing for Safe Americans to hold police accountable for racial profiling and abuse of power, but Biden revoked it. Trump also signed an executive order against gender and racial stereotyping, which Biden revoked, possibly leading to DEI. Biden revokes Trump's policies, renames similar policies, and claims them as his own. The speaker urges listeners to research this information.