TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

This speaker claims that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated or purified, and the PCR test is not reliable for detecting infectious virus. They argue that autopsies are not being conducted to hide the truth about COVID-19. The speaker questions the validity of the vaccine and criticizes the government's handling of the pandemic, including the use of the PCR test. They mention a document sent to the Chief Constable regarding these issues.

Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, explains that the test can detect almost anything in anyone if done properly. However, it was not designed to test for viruses. The official protocol for COVID-19 PCR testing has led to a high number of false positives, resulting in misleading results. Mullis also questioned the HIV-AIDS connection, stating that there was no evidence to support it. He believed that powerful individuals, including Anthony Fauci and Robert Gallo, were involved in a cover-up. Mullis was outspoken about his concerns, but his warnings were largely ignored. He passed away in August 2019.

Dr. Redfield stated that over 90% of the population is still susceptible to the coronavirus. However, the other speaker disagrees, pointing out that the data used by Dr. Redfield is outdated and only accounts for the presence of antibodies. The speaker explains that there is also immunity from T cells and cross-immunity from other infections, which means that the number of people with antibodies is only a small fraction of those with immunity. When asked who to believe, the speaker emphasizes that the science supports their viewpoint and mentions several epidemiologists who share the same perspective. The conversation ends with the acknowledgement of taking a break.

Dr. Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize winner for inventing the PCR test, explains that the test was not designed to detect viruses. The PCR test can find almost anything in anyone if done properly, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's meaningful. The official protocol for COVID-19 PCR testing has led to false positives, labeling asymptomatic individuals as infected. Mullis discovered that there was no proof of HIV causing AIDS when he was hired to measure HIV levels using PCR. He realized that no one had evidence to support the claim. Mullis also exposed how the CDC and high-level officials profited from the HIV/AIDS connection. Despite his willingness to challenge them, few people were interested in exposing the truth. Mullis passed away in 2019, just before the emergence of COVID-19.

We need to be careful not to have too many false positives due to extensive testing. Tests are not 100% accurate and have a small margin of error. If the overall infection rate decreases and testing is expanded to millions, there will be more false positives than actual positives. These are the challenges we face and the insights we gain. Therefore, it still makes sense to offer more testing, but not just randomly every day, rather with a specific goal in mind.

Speaker 0 argues that the test cannot distinguish live from dead matter, only analyzes fragments and is set up to guarantee false positives, which the speaker claims was used to create case numbers for declaring a public health emergency of international concern and to enable untested drugs or vaccines to be used on people. Speaker 1 adds that the biggest lie may be that true viral isolates are unavailable, noting that the claimed genome of SARS-CoV-2 exists only in silico as a computer-programmed genome. The speaker says fear is created to control people, describing “fake mythical flying unicorns” that make us sick and asserting that disease is constructed rather than evidenced by visible agents. They claim that there is no evidence of transmission or isolations supporting the idea of a pathogen causing disease in the usual sense. The speaker references Andrew Kaufman, Doctor Cowan, Stephen Lunk, and others to support the claim that, after a year of pandemic conditions, there is no virus proven through traditional means, including in the 1918 influenza pandemic. They state that volunteers were exposed to sputum from infected individuals, or to the sputum directly, without becoming ill; some experiments involved injecting processed material, which also did not cause illness. They note that horses did not consistently transmit illness when exposed to similar materials, and conclude that influenza does not originate from a Latin term for a virus but means “influence,” suggesting historical transmission evidence is weak. The speakers discuss that we do not have approved evidence of transmission, a virus, a test, or autopsies; what exists is a syndrome of symptoms—flu-like symptoms without pathognomonic signs. They propose several alternative causes for COVID-19–like illness, including transmissibility that appears real but isn’t, radiation effects, and other non-disease explanations. Speaker 1 references Dr. Cowan’s book Contagion to illustrate how radiation exposure in mines could mimic disease transmission, where illness is not truly infectious. They argue that non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) and exposure to graphene oxide toxicity (claimed to be present in vaccines and referred to as viral-based genetic therapies by the FDA) could produce COVID-like symptoms. They also acknowledge an artificially created spike protein in a lab as a known factor. However, they reiterate that there is no evidence for the mythical SARS-CoV-2 virus as a causative agent. In summary, the dialogue challenges the existence of proven SARS-CoV-2 isolates, questions the validity of tests and transmission evidence, and proposes alternative explanations for the illness, including EMF toxicity, graphene oxide toxicity, and lab-made spike proteins, while highlighting a lack of definitive proof for traditional viral causation.

The speakers discuss the expected mutation of the virus and the impact of vaccination. They acknowledge that as people become immunized, the virus will try to find ways to evade the vaccine. The more people are vaccinated, the more pressure is put on the virus to mutate. Some virologists warn that vaccinating the entire world with narrow immunity could lead to the emergence of superbugs. They urge for the use of the right vaccine in the right place and caution against mass vaccination during a pandemic. They argue that current interventions and mass vaccination may be causing more harm than good, driving the emergence of more infectious and potentially lethal variants.

Steven Petty, an expert in industrial hygiene, discusses the misconceptions surrounding the effectiveness of masks in preventing the spread of COVID-19. He highlights that industrial hygiene is a specialized field focused on identifying and controlling environmental factors that can harm individuals. Petty challenges the belief that masks are effective by presenting data showing that COVID-19 cases do not decrease over time, regardless of mask usage. He references studies, such as the Bundgaard study in Denmark and a similar study in Florida, which found no significant difference in disease rates between those wearing masks and those without.

Dr. Mike Yeadon, former Chief Scientific Officer at Pfizer, questions the validity of the Ferguson and Imperial model that predicted high COVID-19 deaths and argues that not everyone is susceptible to the virus due to pre-existing T-cell immunity. He challenges the government to provide evidence for a second wave and criticizes the accuracy of PCR testing. Dr. Yeadon expresses concerns about the negative consequences of lockdown measures and the lack of consideration for population immunity. He suggests that community immunity has been achieved in the UK and questions the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine, advocating for targeted vaccination of high-risk individuals. The speaker also emphasizes the need for transparency and evidence in the approval process for the vaccine, expressing concerns about a COVID passport certificate and mandatory vaccination. They highlight the importance of individual consent and international law. The overassignment of COVID deaths is mentioned, and the possibility of approaching herd immunity is suggested. The speaker advocates for prioritizing the vaccine for vulnerable populations and urges caution in the rollout. The host acknowledges the alternative viewpoints and emphasizes the importance of debate.

In a video, Dr. Mike Yeadon, former Chief Scientific Officer at Pfizer, raises concerns about the likelihood of a second wave of COVID-19 and questions the accuracy of current testing measures. He criticizes the assumptions made by government advisors, suggesting that they overestimated population susceptibility and ignored pre-existing immunity. Dr. Yeadon argues that the current testing regime produces false positives, leading to unnecessary fear and restrictions. He opposes a mass vaccination campaign and advocates for targeted vaccination of vulnerable populations, emphasizing the need for safety and long-term effectiveness data. The speaker also discusses the approval process for the Pfizer vaccine, emphasizing the importance of transparency and evidence. Concerns are raised about COVID vaccine certificates and mandatory vaccinations, with an emphasis on individual consent. The speaker suggests that the country may have already achieved herd immunity and calls for a cautious approach to vaccine distribution, prioritizing the elderly and vulnerable. The interviewer acknowledges the importance of diverse expert opinions and the need for debate on the topic.

Dr. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, explained that the test can find almost anything in anyone if done well. However, using it to claim meaning or diagnose a virus is a misuse. The official protocol for COVID-19 PCR testing has led to false positives, labeling asymptomatic individuals as infected. 30 years ago, Dr. Anthony Fauci pushed for higher doses of the drug AZT for AIDS patients, despite lacking evidence. Mullis discovered there was no proof of HIV causing AIDS. He questioned the CDC's profit motives and the involvement of high-level officials. Mullis wanted to expose Fauci and Gallo but faced little attention. He passed away in 2019, just before the emergence of COVID-19, leaving many questioning the timing.

I am Dr. Roger Hopkinson, a pathologist from Canada. I want to share some important messages regarding the current situation. Firstly, don't believe everything you're being told, as it's all propaganda. This is simply a bad seasonal flu with slightly higher risk for older individuals with underlying health conditions. Secondly, fear is the main problem here, fueled by the unreliable PCR test and the suppression of alternative viewpoints. The PCR test produces over 95% false positives, leading to misleading case numbers. Politicians, media, and physicians have failed to provide unbiased information, prioritizing their own interests over ethics. Fear has been used as an excuse for enforcing measures by politicians and bureaucrats.

The speaker discusses the issue of cycle thresholds in PCR testing. They explain that the original protocol used a cycle threshold of 45, which amplifies the results by 10. This means that even unlikely findings, such as particles from Mars, could be detected. The speaker suggests that by using a high cycle threshold, it is possible to create a pandemic by testing healthy individuals and spreading the myth of asymptomatic spread. This is how cases are created, according to the speaker.

The speaker, a former Pfizer employee, claims that the information and safety measures provided by governments regarding the virus are false. They argue that PCR testing is unreliable and that the public should disregard case rates and announcements. They warn of a hidden agenda and urge people to pay attention and take action. The video includes various news clips reporting on COVID-19 cases and deaths. The speaker questions the accuracy of COVID-19 death counts and compares the virus to the flu. They also discuss the lack of flu cases during the pandemic and suggest that flu cases were mislabeled as COVID-19. The speaker criticizes the PCR test and accuses governments of manipulating the results to drive their agenda. They highlight the potential dangers of the vaccines and express skepticism towards the medical establishment. The video concludes with a call to resist fear and manipulation and to seek the truth.

Speaker 0 asks about the accuracy of claims that asymptomatic carriers exist and that children can be super-spreaders, questioning whether these ideas are true. Speaker 1 responds that these notions are complete nonsense and have never been shown; they are claims that have been spread as facts, and they consider that “criminal.” They state that the idea of asymptomatic carrier spreading the disease Covid-nineteen—which they describe as the pneumonia, not a cough but the pneumonia Covid-nineteen—is untrue and is backed by zero data. They emphasize that there is not a single case in the world documented, and conclude that the whole business is a fake. Speaker 0 follows up by asking whether these ideas are the basis for mask-wearing and many of the associated measures. Speaker 1 confirms, stating that this is “the inhuman part” of forcing people to wear masks “because of no reason,” describing it as taking away people’s rights as humans without reason.

On the topic of the effectiveness of vaccines in controlling the epidemic, the speaker disagrees with the authorities. They state that vaccines do not control the spread of the virus, as countries with higher vaccination rates also have higher case numbers. They suggest that there may be a scientific phenomenon where the number of infection cases increases within 15 days to three weeks after vaccination. This phenomenon, related to facilitating antibodies, has not been sufficiently analyzed or studied in epidemiology. The speaker is Professor Raoul.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss criticisms of the COVID-19 response, focusing on diagnostic testing, treatment, and government actions. Speaker 0 notes that only fourteen percent of PCR-positive cases turned out to be COVID in Germany, and suggests this is a global pattern, including the United States. Speaker 1 responds that there is no surprise, stating that the PCR test was never designed to detect infection. He explains that it detects miniscule particles of the RNA virus and that cycle threshold was cranked up to create positivity. He emphasizes that tests should not dictate treatment and that, in his view, doctors treat patients, not test results. He accuses the government of suppressing effective repurposed medications such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, calling the approach a money-driven scam based on fear, and asserts this was no surprise from Germany. Speaker 0 adds that, beyond money and vaccines, the response was weaponized to keep people at home to influence political outcomes, suggesting it was part of efforts related to the 2020 election. He claims the positives were valued over negatives and asserts that the goal was to keep people in fear to ensure compliance with directives. Speaker 1 agrees, arguing that fear increases compliance with directives. He says he has never seen anything like the government imposing its will on free citizens, including closing churches and mom-and-pop stores, forcing healthy people to stay indoors, closing hospitals, and telling sick people to stay away. He expresses concern about whether the American people learned their lesson and hopes that, if the government acts similarly again, enough people will stand up and say, “hell no.”

In the early pandemic, 2020–2021, eighty six percent of PCR-confirmed COVID cases were not real infections. The speaker asserts that all of the lockdowns, all of the vaccine mandates, and all of those policies that destroyed livelihoods and the economy were based on a completely fraudulent metric. A study is described that compared PCR positive rates by week to the actual antibody testing in the same weeks, noting that the antibody test indicates whether you got antibodies to COVID. The speaker states that only fourteen percent had actual antibodies among those PCR positive cases. It is claimed that it may even be up to ninety percent weren't real infections. The speaker concludes that this fraud is confirmed and calls for accountability for all the people who lost their jobs and were forced to take injections based on this fear campaign, which was based on this false test.

The PCR test, used to detect the presence of the SARS CoV-2 virus, has come under scrutiny for its reliability and potential for false positives. The test amplifies RNA fragments to identify the virus, but it can also detect traces of dead virus or remnants from other coronaviruses. Testing at high cycle thresholds can result in false positives, especially in populations with low COVID-19 prevalence. Scientists recommend not testing over 30 cycle thresholds to reduce false positives. Lowering the cycle thresholds has led to significant reductions in reported cases. The misuse and misinterpretation of the PCR test has contributed to inflated case numbers and unnecessary panic.

Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize winner for inventing the PCR test, explains how the test can find almost anything if amplified enough. The PCR test for COVID-19 has been misused to create false positives. Mullis discovered there was no proof linking HIV to AIDS, exposing a sham in the medical industry. He criticized CDC's profit motives and called out Anthony Fauci and Robert Gallo. Mullis wanted to expose the truth on TV but faced little support. Despite his efforts, his voice was not widely heard before his passing at age 74.

The speaker emphasizes the PCR test as the foundation of the current situation, stating that without it, there would be no cases or public health emergency. They question the necessity of measures taken, pointing out the absence of excess mortality before the vaccination campaign. The speaker suggests focusing efforts on addressing the PCR test as the key issue.