reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speakers discuss covert weapons causing no visible wounds, potentially used in Washington DC. Russian agents suspect Americans of using similar weapons. The CIA may be concealing this technology. Reasons for lack of public disclosure include operational risks. Urgent actions needed include implementing the Havana Act for DOD survivors. Bipartisan support is shown for helping victims and preventing future harm.

We now know without a doubt that Obama, Brennan, Clapper, and Comey were attacking our democracy, all while accusing us of attacking democracy. We know these things because director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released hundreds of documents revealing that the mindful objections of senior intel officials were ignored. Foreign spies were given a US government endorsed platform to smear Trump with abject lies. They used these lies to illegally spy on the Trump campaign. Former CIA director John Brennan lied to congress about his role. The cover up effort was real. Now that director Gabbard has revealed the truth, where will it all lead?

You were attacked by a directed energy weapon. The intelligence community has obstructed congressional investigations, indicating a cover-up that should alarm all Americans. A recent report suggests a foreign adversary may be responsible for injuries like vertigo and traumatic brain injuries among U.S. personnel, including those in various countries. Many victims, including a retired CIA officer, report debilitating symptoms and believe they were gaslit by the CIA. Despite the Department of Defense acknowledging their experiences, the CIA remains dismissive. The officer expresses frustration over the treatment of women and the lack of accountability within the CIA. She hopes for change, emphasizing the need for proper investigation and care for victims to prevent future incidents.

Speaker 0: If these assessments are correct, they are very covert weapons, aren’t they? Speaker 1: That’s correct. There’s no entry or exit wound. How they’re designed is to make the target feel like they’re crazy, like they’re imagining things. Speaker 0: And you also said these attacks are happening right here in this city. Is that correct? Speaker 2: I mean, have been some that have gone public with respect to Washington DC. Speaker 0: I think it was Mister Grozov said you spoke to a Russian agent who said that they believe that Americans are using the same weapons on them. Is that correct? Speaker 3: That is correct. Speaker 0: Might that have something to do with part of the CIA’s motive to cover up the existence of the this tech and these weapons? Speaker 3: That is a very logical possibility. Speaker 0: Thank you. Mister chairman, I yield back. Speaker 2: Gentleman yields. Chair now recognize the gentleman from New York, Mister Goldman, for his random questioning. Speaker 3 (Mister Goldman): Thank you, Mister chairman, and thank you to our witnesses for being here. Mister Grosev, I want a follow-up on the interactions you’ve had with Russian intelligence about these AHIs. Mister Zaid, I want to ask—this is hypothetical—but I’m trying to understand why the U.S. government would try to block information sharing or conceal information that they have. One thing that comes to mind is whether there’s an operational risk to revealing any of the details of their investigation. Is that something you have come across in any of your work? Speaker 2 (Mister Zaid): There are a lot of reasons why the information might not be publicly released. I do think that’s something we could address more in a classified environment to explain that, but there are understandable reasons why the U.S. government has not revealed much of what it knows. Speaker 1: There’s some long-term things that needs to be done in terms of new acts. But in the short term, we need to do things like implement the original Havana Act.

Mark Lindsey, a State Department whistleblower and expert in defending against electronic spying, alleges a cover-up of directed energy attacks, including Havana syndrome. Lindsey claims he and his family were targeted in China in 2018, resulting in brain injuries. He says a government testing record confirming his directed energy exposure was altered to remove references to it, and that the State Department and CIA were responsible. Lindsey alleges fraud related to a $5,000,000 State Department contract, claiming his signature was forged on compliance paperwork. He also reports concerning energy readings at the U.S. Embassy in Vilnius, Lithuania, which he believes indicate a potential attack, but says he was told to remove this data from his report. Lindsey believes the US government minimizes potential directed energy attacks. He says he has faced retaliation for exposing fraud, waste, and abuse, including pressure involving his family. He also expresses concern that the State Department did not test his children after the incident in China, which he believes worsened their injuries.

The speakers discuss covert weapons causing no entry or exit wounds, making targets feel crazy. Attacks are reported in Washington, DC. Russian agents suspect Americans of using similar weapons. CIA may be covering up the technology. Reasons for withholding information include operational risks. Long-term solutions are needed, such as implementing the Havana Act.

The speakers discuss covert, undetectable weapons described as directed energy weapons that leave no bomb fragments or entry/exit wounds. Speaker 1 confirms that these weapons are designed to make targets feel like they are imagining things, especially at low-duration, long-duration hits. They claim attacks are occurring in the United States, with public references to Washington DC, and suggest a possible connection to the CIA’s motive to cover up the existence of the technology and weapons. Speaker 2 escalates the claim, stating that directed energy weapons are being used at home and that initial rollouts, including five G, led to widespread illness. The message shifts from a broader conspiracy to a personal-health threat, asserting that the issue affects “everybody” and that conservatives or “purebloods” are being targeted by this system. Symptoms described include chronic fatigue, recurring headaches, back problems, and pain not linked to injury. The speaker asserts that what people experience is not what they think and accuses a deliberate attempt to withhold the truth about the weapons. There is a strong promotional element urging readers to consult a book titled “Transhuman Genocide,” claimed to explain shielding, the weapons, and artificial intelligence, and to be available on Amazon. The speaker emphasizes that readers who have felt unwell since the rollout of five G are likely targets and warns of long-duration attacks that mimic cancer stages, cause heart attacks and strokes, and put listeners in danger. The closing line asserts, “If you’re listening to this, you are the resistance.”

Directed energy weapons are real and have been used against US government personnel, causing brain network disruption and cell death. Mike Beck, a retired counterintelligence officer, believes he was attacked by a hostile intelligence service using such a weapon, resulting in Parkinson's and dementia. Despite a doctor's letter linking his condition to microwave weapon exposure, his worker's compensation was initially denied multiple times, and the government is behind on assisted living payments. James Giordano, a neuroscientist, explained how directed energy weapons, including sonic and microwave weapons, can cause brain injuries. A CIA whistleblower described similar attacks and resulting health issues among colleagues. While a government assessment deemed foreign adversary involvement in Havana syndrome unlikely, Marco Rubio stated that some injuries have no other logical explanation than an external mechanism. There's a perceived shift towards acknowledging the reality of these weapons and the need to support victims. Beck and his wife are seeking equity, recognition, and an end to these attacks.

Before the COVID pandemic, Dr. Fauci, as head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, provided millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to fund “dangerous gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses” at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, work described as the source of an unintentional lab leak that sparked the pandemic. On the final day as Director of National Intelligence, the speaker says they are releasing “never-before-seen communications and documents” intended to show how Fauci worked with “politicized career leadership” in the intelligence community to suppress the truth about his actions, the lab leak origins, and his role in directing U.S. funding for the research. The documents are said to demonstrate Fauci’s influence over and manipulation of intelligence community COVID-19 assessments and to show Fauci lied to Congress in 2024 by denying knowledge of or participation in discussions with intelligence officials about viral research. The speaker also states that multiple intelligence community whistleblowers provided testimony that they faced retaliation for challenging manipulation of intelligence regarding the virus’s origins. The speaker describes this as a “pattern of suppressing dissent, silencing critics, and burying the truth.” The speaker says Fauci’s close relationships with the intelligence community enabled him to occupy three roles that “shield[ed] him from scrutiny”: 1) Funding dangerous gain-of-function coronavirus research linked to big pharma and its pursuit of universal vaccines worth trillions of dollars. 2) Acting as a behind-the-scenes advisor, alongside hand-picked “experts,” to push the intelligence community to endorse a natural animal origin, framed as a way to hide Fauci-funded gain-of-function research using taxpayer dollars and to shift blame away from Fauci’s actions. 3) Serving as a “pandemic pundit,” publicly pushing “lies, disinformation, and censorship” across available platforms. According to “hundreds of reviewed emails” included in the release, the intelligence community “almost always incorporated Fauci’s recommendations.” The speaker says Fauci promoted a paper whose publication he helped prompt as legitimate information for intelligence community consideration. Senior analysts are described as praising Fauci as an “unbiased guide” to real coronavirus experts while ignoring experts who might dissent from Fauci’s narratives. The speaker further claims Fauci “blatantly lied” to Congress under oath during his 2024 testimony to the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, denying he spoke to any intelligence agency about COVID, and says the newly released correspondence directly contradicts that sworn testimony. The speaker reports whistleblowers described threats of retaliation, marginalization, and career setbacks for analysts who challenged Fauci’s conclusions. Examples provided include a contractor terminated days after coming forward to ODNI as a whistleblower, and managers telling advocates for the lab leak hypothesis or those expressing dissent that leadership would determine promotions. The speaker says senior leaders also attempted to undermine whistleblowers by removing anonymity required by the whistleblower process and insisting their managers or attorneys be present during ODNI meetings, described as creating an atmosphere of intimidation. The speaker concludes that the release is intended to provide transparency, truth, and accountability, citing “lies and censorship and coverups,” and describing the tactics used as part of a “deep state playbook.”

Directed energy weapons are real and have been used against US government personnel, causing brain disruption and cell death. Mike Beck, a retired counterintelligence officer, was attacked while on assignment and subsequently diagnosed with Parkinson's. A leading expert confirmed Beck's condition was due to microwave weapon exposure, more clearly documented than in Havana syndrome cases. The US government is accused of a cover-up, denying worker's compensation and delaying payments for Beck's assisted living. There are reportedly nearly 2,000 attacks in over a dozen countries. James Giordano, an advisor to the US military, identified sonic and microwave weapons as the primary types used. A CIA whistleblower, Alice, described similar attacks and resulting health issues. While an intelligence community assessment downplayed foreign adversary involvement, Marco Rubio acknowledged unexplained brain injuries. There's a perceived shift towards recognizing the reality of these weapons and the need for support. Beck's family seeks equity and asks for a cleanup of inaccuracies and for the US to prioritize the safety of its citizens.

Directed energy weapons are real and have been used against US government personnel, causing brain disruption and cell death. Mike Beck, a retired counterintelligence officer, claims he was attacked by a hostile intelligence service with such a weapon, resulting in Parkinson's and dementia. Despite a doctor's letter linking his condition to microwave weapon exposure, his worker's compensation was initially denied multiple times, and the government is behind on payments for his assisted living. James Giordano, an advisor to the US military, notes that Havana syndrome, or anomalous health incidents, may be linked to directed energy weapons. There are reportedly three types of directed energy weapons: two forms of sonic weapons and scalable, directable microwaves. These weapons can cause lasting and progressive damage by disrupting brain networks. The US, China, and Russia are believed to have developed these technologies. Some believe the US government is covering up these attacks to protect its reputation, while others, like Marco Rubio, acknowledge the reality of brain injuries caused by external mechanisms and the need for support for victims.

These covert weapons leave no physical evidence, making it easy for adversaries to deny their use. The attacks are happening in Washington DC, with reports of similar weapons being used by Americans on Russians. This could be related to the CIA's efforts to conceal this technology.

The former acting CIA director coordinated with the Biden campaign to release a letter from 51 intelligence analysts, which has since been disproven. It has now been revealed that some of the signatories were active CIA contractors at the time. The Trump CIA leadership knew about the letter beforehand but did not intervene. This information is currently being reported on justinews.com.

Directed energy weapons are real and have been used against US government personnel, causing brain network disruption and cell death. Mike Beck, a former counterintelligence officer, was attacked in a hostile country and subsequently developed Parkinson's and dementia. A leading expert confirmed Beck's condition was due to microwave weapon exposure, more clearly documented than in Havana syndrome cases. Despite evidence, Beck's worker's compensation was initially denied multiple times, and the government is behind on assisted living payments. A CIA whistleblower also described being targeted by directed energy weapons in Africa, leading to similar health issues among colleagues. Experts identified sonic and microwave weapons as the primary types used. While a US intelligence report deemed foreign adversary involvement in Havana syndrome unlikely, victims and some officials believe there is a cover-up. Marco Rubio stated that some injuries have no other logical explanation than an external mechanism. The US, China, and Russia are considered the "big three" in developing these technologies. Victims seek recognition, care, and an end to the attacks.

Directed energy weapons are real and have been used against US government personnel, causing brain network disruption and cell death. Mike Beck, a former counterintelligence officer, describes being attacked in a hostile country and subsequently developing Parkinson's. A leading expert confirms Beck's microwave weapon exposure is more documented than Havana syndrome cases. James Giordano notes that in 2016, US diplomats experienced debilitating brain injuries known as Havana syndrome. There are three types of directed energy weapons: two sonic and one using scalable microwaves, which disrupt brain function. Beck's condition has deteriorated, leading to assisted living. A 2014 memo links the hostile country to a microwave weapon system. The government requires an admission of guilt from the hostile country, which is an unreasonable standard. Microwaves can damage the brain, causing lasting and progressive effects. The US, China, and Russia have developed these technologies. A CIA whistleblower, Alice, describes similar attacks and resulting health issues. While the Labor Department acknowledges Beck's brain injury, payments for his assisted living are often delayed. An intelligence community assessment downplays foreign adversary involvement, which is considered ridiculous. Marco Rubio acknowledges unexplained brain injuries and the need for support. There is a growing recognition of the reality of these weapons and injuries. The Becks are fighting for equity and for the President to address the situation and protect Americans from harm.

These covert weapons leave no trace, making it easy for adversaries to deny their use. They cause targets to feel crazy with no visible wounds. Attacks are reported in Washington DC, with suspicions of Americans using similar weapons on Russians. This could be linked to the CIA's mission to conceal such technology.

Directed energy weapons are real and have been used against US government personnel, causing brain network disruption and cell death. Mike Beck, a retired counterintelligence officer, believes he was attacked by a hostile intelligence service using such a weapon, resulting in Parkinson's and dementia. Despite a doctor's letter linking his condition to microwave weapon exposure, his worker's compensation was initially denied multiple times, and the government is behind on assisted living payments. James Giordano, a neuroscientist, explained how directed energy weapons, including sonic and microwave weapons, can cause brain injuries. A CIA whistleblower, "Alice," described similar attacks and resulting health issues among colleagues. While a government assessment deemed foreign adversary involvement in Havana syndrome unlikely, Marco Rubio stated that some injuries have no other logical explanation than an external mechanism. There is a perceived shift towards recognizing the reality of these weapons, the injuries they cause, and the need for action. Beck and his wife are seeking equity and for the government to acknowledge the harm caused to its personnel.

Discussion centers on 'Guys, if your, assessments here are correct, these are very covert weapons, aren't they?' 'There's no entry or exit wound. How they're designed is to make the target feel like they're crazy.' 'And you guys also said that these attacks are happening right here in this city. Is that correct?' 'I mean, have been some that have gone public with respect to Washington DC.' 'I think it was mister you mister Grozov said you spoke to a Russian agent who said that they believe that Americans are using the same weapons on them. Is that correct?' 'That is correct.' 'Might that have something to do with part of the CIA's motive to cover up the existence of the this tech and these weapons?' 'That is a very logical possibility.' 'There's a lot of reasons why the information might not be publicly released.' 'There's some long term things that needs to be done in terms of of new acts. But in the short term, we need to do things like implement the original Havana Act. DOD'

There's no entry or exit wound. How they're designed is to make the target feel like they're crazy, like they're imagining things. And you guys also said that these attacks are happening right here in this city. I mean, have been some that have gone public with respect to Washington DC. that they believe that Americans are using the same weapons on them. That is correct. Might that have something to do with part of the CIA's motive to cover up the existence of the this tech and these weapons? That is a very logical possibility. There's a lot of reasons why the information might not be publicly released. And I do think that's something we could address more in a classified environment to explain that, but there are understandable reasons why the US government, has not revealed much of what it knows.

From a firsthand account about the whistleblower within ODNI who worked for then, Obama's DNI, James Clapper, about how he refused to go along with this. "As a result, he was sidelined and cut out of this." "He was the cyber guy in the director, in the director of national intelligence, James Clapper's, team." "He was sidelined because he wouldn't play along with the lie that they were creating, and he did blow the whistle." "He raised this through the ICIG." "He raised this, tried to raise this with multiple members of congress, including senator Warner." "He never got calls back." "They were not interested in what he had to say and what he had experienced." "He even tried then to go and report this to the Department of Justice, under, president Biden and was refused." "No action." "They were not interested in taking action in this."

According to the speaker, Gina Haspel, as CIA station chief in England in 2016, authorized intelligence operations related to Russiagate. The speaker claims that Haspel is a leading architect of Russiagate who has remained behind the scenes. They allege that Haspel's authorization was necessary for US FBI and IC officials, and possibly other intelligence allies, to conduct bumping operations in England. The speaker also asserts that Haspel blocked the release of a report on John Brennan's ICA (Intelligence Community Assessment) regarding Russian interference in the US elections. This report, created by Devin Nunez and others, supposedly detailed the corruption involved in the ICA's creation. Despite requests for its declassification, Haspel, along with others, allegedly used national security concerns to keep it secret, effectively covering up their own corruption. The speaker believes the report's release is crucial to exposing the extent of IC involvement and corruption.

Some stories are challenging to report, especially regarding attacks on intelligence, military, and state department personnel. These incidents have occurred in over a dozen countries, revealing common patterns in the types of injuries sustained. Evidence suggests that a foreign adversary may be responsible for these attacks. The affected individuals are part of a highly vetted group, entrusted with sensitive government secrets. Acknowledging that US personnel are being targeted while on assignment sends a concerning message: no one is safe.

Foreign adversaries are using direct energy weapons on US citizens, known as Savannah Syndrome. A classified briefing revealed the severity of the situation, leaving the speaker, a former Navy SEAL, shaken. The speaker emphasizes the importance of the upcoming election due to leadership failures.

The speaker claims a CIA whistleblower will testify before a Senate committee that the intelligence community has covered up the origin of COVID for years. The speaker asserts evidence shows the U.S. government funded research in Wuhan and that the virus likely escaped from a lab, adding that CIA scientists concluded it came from a lab leak and that someone later “scribbled out” their conclusion at 2AM and changed the report. The speaker frames CIA involvement as part of a larger effort involving military-related covert operations, stating the CIA has two reasons to live: covert support for the State Department or for the military. The speaker argues that over time, long-term CIA covert actions become USAID programs for logistical reasons, especially when scaling beyond a small “need to know” group and security-clearance constrained operations. The speaker says covert action requires secrecy, skiffs, close-hold communications, and a small number of people, so a public-facing program is needed to broaden participation. In that model, the speaker says USAID or state department programs can engage the private sector, nonprofits, universities, researchers, activists, and media, with public messaging and political support to help scale the underlying aims while keeping the core plan secret. The speaker links this asserted COVID narrative to historical biological warfare and “gain of function” research, citing declassified documents from the 1950s and Operation Northwoods-era plans involving Cuba. The speaker claims Cold War U.S. military and CIA planning included “gain of function” research and the dropping of disease-infected ticks and insects over Cuban agricultural areas to induce crop failures and economically destabilize Cuba without a conventional military invasion. The speaker further claims the plans involved making biological agents appear to be of natural origin and avoiding traceable external attribution, describing discussion of using “nonlethal insect borne biological warfare agents” and coordinating planning information with specific people and labs. The speaker states that, according to their account, biological warfare planning involved references to Fort Detrick and the Rocky Mountain lab in Montana, which they say also played a key role in both COVID-19 and Lyme disease. They claim the same lab used for Lyme was connected to plans for accidental releases intended to look natural. From there, the speaker argues that COVID-origin research ties into personnel and timelines. They claim that in 2015 the CIA and ODNI reached out to Ralph Baric to discuss coronavirus evolution and adapting coronaviruses to humans, and that shortly afterward Baric collaborated with Zheng Li Shi (“the bat lady”) on research funded through USAID’s PREDICT program. The speaker also claims that in 2018 Baric and Zheng Li Shi were listed as collaborators on a DARPA proposal involving a furin cleavage site, and that in January 2020 Baric was summoned by ODNI biological sciences experts to brief officials on coronavirus origins, discussing a possible accidental lab release at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The speaker asserts Avril Haines, then deputy head of the CIA, later became head of ODNI and played a key role in the Event 201 simulator. The speaker concludes by tying these threads back to the alleged CIA-to-USAID scaling mechanism and to CIA contractors and censorship efforts, claiming that the CIA’s role explains why CIA-walked scientists concluded a lab leak and why the conclusion was allegedly altered. They also discuss NIE/DOD/USAID/NED linkages, asserting that NED is suited for the role of supporting covert objectives with indirect public-facing infrastructure.