reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Recently, some police officers testified about their trauma during the January 6th events. One officer described being outnumbered and attacked while protecting the Capitol. However, it turns out he wasn't in uniform or acting as a Capitol Police officer; he was an FBI informant carrying a Confederate flag. This revelation challenges the narrative surrounding the events, suggesting it was not as strong or truthful as presented. There's a call to release FBI files to uncover the real story and identify those truly responsible.

Kamala Harris, then VP-elect, was secretly in the DNC building on January 6th, but kept it hidden until recently. The Secret Service, responsible for her protection, showed bizarre behavior when a pipe bomb was discovered near their vehicles. They did not react or evacuate the area, even allowing children to walk near the bomb. The timing of the bomb's discovery coincided with the initial breach on the Capitol by the Peace Monument. This suggests coordination and raises questions about the true intentions behind the pipe bomb incident. The full truth is yet to be revealed, but it is clear that there is a cover-up and efforts to control the narrative. The story is expected to unravel in the coming months, possibly with the help of whistleblowers.

New information has emerged regarding internal FBI messages related to January 6th. The messages reveal a demand to edit confidential human source reports and remove agent participation. In a recent court filing, it was disclosed that FBI special agent Nicole Miller compiled her messages in an Excel spreadsheet, which was produced to the US attorney's office. However, a closer examination of the spreadsheet uncovered over 1,000 hidden rows of messages. The documents also show an agent requesting Miller to edit out their presence in a CHS informant report. Additionally, there is mention of an FBI boss assigning the destruction of 338 items of evidence. These revelations suggest that the FBI was present during the January 6th events, infiltrating groups and inciting violence.

Over the past 3 years, Representative questioned FBI Director Wray and Attorney General Garland about federal assets at the Capitol on January 6th, but received no answers. The Inspector General announced a review of the DOJ response in 2021, paused it due to ongoing criminal cases, and reinitiated it last year. The report will include information on the number of confidential human sources operating on Capitol grounds on January 6th, but the exact number is not available yet due to the draft form and classification review. The report's release is not expected before the election, and possibly not before the next inauguration. The report will expose the presence of confidential human sources at the Capitol, and whether DOJ CHS protocols were followed. Representative inquired about the failed FBI investigation of the January 6th pipe bomb, citing lost information, deleted Secret Service texts, and corrupted cell phone data. The FBI allegedly lacks video footage of the DNC from January 6th. The Inspector General couldn't rule out the involvement of confidential human sources in the pipe bomb incident.

I met with Capitol Police today and learned some startling information regarding the January 6th investigation. The so-called "backpack guy," who I was told was a plainclothes police officer, was the one who discovered the pipe bomb. This revelation heightens my concerns about the timeline of events, especially regarding the Secret Service and Metro Police response. The timing of the pipe bomb discoveries is also suspicious. The first bomb at the Capitol Hill Club (mistakenly called the RNC bomb), was found just five minutes before the breach of the Capitol perimeter. Then, a second bomb was found only fifteen minutes after securing the first location. It seems incredibly coincidental that these events happened in such close proximity to each other.

I met with Capitol Police and learned that the individual who discovered the pipe bomb on January 6th was an undercover officer. This raises concerns about the response time of the Secret Service and Metro Police, who took four minutes to act. The timing of the bomb discoveries coincided with the Capitol breach, which may have distracted law enforcement. The investigation into the bombs is ongoing, but there are questions about their operability and the involvement of the FBI. The January 6th committee report suggests that the discovery of the bombs prevented reinforcements from arriving at the Capitol, potentially facilitating the breach. There are ongoing discussions about accountability for those involved in the events of that day.

The speaker discusses the FBI's ongoing investigation into the January 6th Capitol riot and the arrest of Trump supporters who were present. They highlight the FBI's inability to find information about the individuals responsible for planting pipe bombs outside the RNC and DNC headquarters the night before the riot. The speaker then analyzes a recently released video showing the moment one of the bombs was discovered, raising questions about the authorities' lack of concern and the involvement of the Secret Service. They also mention the failure of the media to cover this story and the suspicious actions of Vice President-elect Kamala Harris. The transcript ends with an update revealing that the person who alerted the police about the bomb was a plainclothes officer with the Capitol Police.

- Kibbe on Liberty hosts Congressman Thomas Massey for part one of a mega episode focusing on the FBI-identified pipe bomber in the January 6 events and the anomalies in the official narrative; Massey argues he does not believe one loner acted alone. - Massey discusses prior coverage and context, noting a Steve Baker interview that documented inconsistencies in the official narrative. He points to fallout from that interview: a Capitol Hill Police official, who was third in command, resigned the day after the interview; another whistleblower contacted Massey about that officer, suggesting misconduct unrelated to the pipe bomb but part of a larger pattern of investigations. - Massey argues that the FBI’s announcement of a suspect came about a week after that interview and after reporting by The Blaze, and suggests the timing is suspicious. He says this coincidence is surprising and potentially a red flag, given that the investigation had been deemed inconclusive or dormant for years. - Massey emphasizes his own context: his staffer on the Hill watched hours of video to identify who found the second pipe bomb; he asserts that the individuals who found the second bomb should be considered suspects, and that the FBI admitted this to him. He recounts efforts with Kevin McCarthy to release video showing how the second pipe bomb was found, noting that those who found it were very lucky to locate it quickly. - He describes other connections and leads: his staffer now works for Kash Patel; Massey has spoken with a counter-surveillance officer who found the pipe bomb and with the officer’s handler, a Capitol Hill Police member who had previously worked for the ATF and later for Metro Police and Capitol Hill Police. He also mentions conversing with the assistant FBI director in charge of the Washington field office, in a transcribed interview with Jim Jordan about why cell phone data wasn’t used to geolocate the suspect (the provider allegedly corrupted data, which the judiciary committee and Barry Loudermilk’s committee disputed). - Massey references a 100-page report from Barry Loudermilk’s committee on the pipe bomb investigation, noting leads the FBI did not follow. He mentions a lead about an individual in Falls Church, Virginia (a former military man now in government service) whose metro card was used on January 5 and January 6; this person’s childhood friend allegedly used the metro card to approach the RNC/Capitol Hill Club area and take photographs near the pipe bomb sites. Massey asserts this person of interest, plus a neighbor who shared a wall with him, could be connected to others the FBI has not fully explored. - He contends that the arrest appears to derail other investigations and interviews that were being planned. He asserts that a “pro-Trump” motive has not been established for the suspect, contrasting the media’s framing with details such as the suspect’s My Little Pony interest and parental political donations. - Massey criticizes the prosecutor in the case, Jocelyn Ballantine, and recounts concerns about her track record (including involvement in the Flynn case, the Proud Boys case, and alleged attempts to obtain confessions implicating Trump). He questions why she remains at the DOJ. - They discuss broader concerns about FBI politicization and surveillance: Massey references reporters and contact with Kash Patel’s team to argue for cleaning house at the FBI, but notes Ballantine remains in place. He describes eight senators discovering they had been spied on, leading to a legislative push: in the last continuing resolution, lawmakers added a half-million-dollar payout and standing to sue the government for surveillance abuses, a provision he characterizes as carving exemptions out of the law; he says this was supported by most lawmakers, who voted for the CR due to Trump concerns. - They debate possible explanations for the pipe bomber case: the possibility that the FBI identified the suspect and cleared him, prompting no arrest due to exonerating information; or the possibility of a false narrative crafted by others to preserve the January 6 prosecution framework; or the involvement of a patsy or rogue actor. - Massey reiterates his three things he said on Twitter: the bomber was a lone wolf (which he disputes); the FBI was unwittingly incompetent for four years (which he says he questions and calls a cover-up); and it was not a Trump supporter. He stresses the need for more transcribed interviews and explanations from the FBI and ongoing oversight to uncover the full truth. - The discussion shifts toward Epstein files coverage and the broader goal of maintaining public pressure for transparency. They indicate a plan to release a separate bonus episode focusing on Epstein files.

The FBI is being criticized for not being transparent with Congress about their actions regarding a whistleblower's allegations. The whistleblower came forward because they were unsatisfied with how the FBI handled the information. The FBI is accused of covering up and not being forthcoming with Congress, who has the authority to oversee and investigate such matters. Congress should have access to the investigative materials, but the FBI is withholding them.

The speaker discusses the FBI's "failed investigation" of the January 6th pipe bomb, alleging the FBI has no leads or suspects, has lost information and evidence, and that the Secret Service deleted all texts from January 6th. The speaker claims Steve D'Antuono said cell phone data that could have been used to find the bomber was corrupted. The speaker states that the FBI does not have video footage of the DNC from January 6th. The speaker asks if confidential human sources were involved in the pipe bomb incident. The other speaker responded they would have to refresh themselves on the information gathered to date. The speaker suggests getting the information public before the election.

A recent Justice Department report revealed that the FBI had 26 confidential informants present during the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021. Most of these informants engaged in illegal activities, with only three instructed to observe potential domestic terrorists. Vice president-elect JD Vance noted that this information was previously dismissed as a conspiracy theory. There’s frustration over the Democrats' portrayal of Donald Trump as a threat to democracy, especially as new evidence supports his claims about a rigged process. The speaker expresses anger at the hypocrisy of the Democratic party, which accuses the right of corruption while being guilty of similar actions. Overall, there's a sense of disillusionment with the political narrative surrounding the events of January 6.

There were multiple improbable factors that would have had to align for these bombs to be discovered at the same time on a sidewalk, prompting questions about a broader conspiracy and how such a scenario could unfold. The speakers emphasize that while they want to avoid a conspiracy path, there are many questions still open, including the handling of video footage. Regarding video records, one speaker notes that they want to review January 6 video to see if anyone returned to the locations, but that video apparently does not exist anymore. They do have January 5 video, but have been told that no one preserved January 6. This raises eyebrows as they consider whether the devices were placed by an inexperienced person who was trying to set them down quickly or whether the devices were left to be found. Mrs. Younger’s account is highlighted: she walked out her back door and did not see anything earlier in the morning, but saw the devices later, which would give a reason to believe she would have noticed them if they had been there in the morning. This observation is part of why they want to talk to her. One speaker is blown away by a point: according to the FBI, the FBI’s internal data indicate 39,000 videos showing the hoodie-clad pipe bomber—referred to as the C. Virkel bomber—movements that night, from various camera angles. Washington, DC, Capitol Hill is described as among the most surveilled areas in the world. Yet there is a claim that there is no footage from January 6 of the actual areas a person would have had to travel to place the pipe bombs. The other speaker confirms that there are cameras along some Capitol Police lines that show walking paths, including footage from Capitol Police cameras, but the angles that would show positions behind the RNC and behind the DNC do not exist today, at least not in a way that captures the relevant movements. This absence has limited the investigation into the theory that the devices could have been placed earlier and then moved or re-placed. They are now going back through Capitol Police footage, including from the Fairchild Building near the DNC, which has provided the most evidence so far. The team is reviewing hours from about 8 PM on May 5 to 1 PM on January 6 to determine whether anyone else passed by, whether there was any suspicious activity, and whether the devices were moved again. The investigators are evaluating step-by-step explanations for these anomalies, considering whether the Secret Service dog failed to detect one device or whether Mrs. Younger missed the other, whether the devices were not present at that time, or whether weather and other factors affected detections. They acknowledge that with so many circumstances, some “smoke” might indicate “fire.” They hope the FBI is reviewing cell phone data to determine if the suspected bomber returned or if a co-conspirator was involved in setting timers or re-placing devices. The transcript ends with an acknowledgment of ongoing investigation scope and questions.

During a congressional hearing, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz admitted the FBI had confidential human sources (CHS) embedded in the January 6th Capitol crowd. GOP Rep. Thomas Massie questioned why it's taken almost 4 years to reveal the number of informants involved, but Horowitz declined to provide a specific number, promising a future report. Massie inquired if informants who entered the Capitol would be prosecuted like other J6 participants and if any were compensated for travel. Fox News suggested the presence of FBI informants was a significant development. Stephen Dantuono, former head of the FBI's Washington DC field office, previously stated the field office had CHS embedded in the J6 crowd and that informants from other field offices were also present. Rep. Clay Higgins claimed busloads of FBI moles were sent to DC on January 6th. The J6 pipe bomb suspect may also have been a federal government asset.

The congressman questions the Department of Justice about the investigation into pipe bombs found on January 6. The DOJ refuses to provide specific details due to ongoing investigations. The congressman presses for answers on ATF personnel present, training provided to Capitol Police, and whether the pipe bombs were part of a training exercise. The DOJ reiterates its policy of not commenting on pending investigations. The congressman also questions the DOJ's stance on gun sales and registries. The DOJ emphasizes the importance of preventing straw purchases. The congressman expresses concerns about banks sharing records with the government without legal processes.

The DNC pipe bomb was planted on January 6th at 7:52 PM, according to the FBI. They released two clips from different security cameras. The first camera shows the suspect arriving at 7:42 PM, sitting on bench 1, then leaving. Ten minutes later, he returns and sits on bench 2. At 7:52 PM, the second camera captures him planting the bomb next to the bush, but the view is obstructed. The first camera has a clearer shot of both benches, yet the FBI has not released the full footage from it. This raises questions about transparency, especially since there is a $100,000 reward for information leading to the suspect's capture.

After a 4-year investigation, the justice department released a 300-page report on the FBI's failures. Members of Congress will bring in John Durham to review the findings. The investigation confirms what we already knew from a previous inspector general report: the FBI did not uphold their duty to follow the law in certain events and activities related to the crossfire hurricane and intelligence operations.

There is reasonable suspicion that federal agents were involved in the January 6th events, supported by a video showing an individual with an earpiece directing people into the building. Additionally, Ray Epps was briefly on the FBI's most wanted list, raising questions about his status as either deceased or an informant. Under congressional testimony, Jill Sanborn, head of the FBI Counterintelligence Division, was asked about federal agents' involvement and stated she couldn't answer at that time. This evasiveness suggests a potential cover-up, as a definitive "no" would have been expected if there were no agents involved.

The transcript centers on a report from NBC News about the man charged with planting two pipe bombs near the Democratic and Republican party headquarters on the eve of the January 6th attack. The speaker cites NBC’s article, which states that the suspect told the FBI he believed conspiracy theories about the 2020 election, according to two people familiar with the matter. The speaker notes that NBC provides no direct quote or further context beyond that single claim. The speaker asserts that their own sources indicate the word used by the suspect, Brian Cole Jr., in his FBI interview was that he believed the 2020 election was stolen. However, the speaker claims there is a widespread belief within the FBI that this comment was a legal maneuver rather than a genuine belief. According to the speaker, the FBI allegedly thinks the statement was coached by Cole’s lawyer to secure a pardon from President Trump, specifically a retroactive pardon because Trump had issued a pardon for individuals convicted of January 6–related crimes. The speaker emphasizes that there is no additional evidence in Cole Jr.’s background, as far as their sources can determine, indicating he is a Trump supporter. They remark that NBC is one of the few outlets making this claim, noting that the article contains several paragraphs but only repeats the initial sentence without further detail. The speaker suggests that even within liberal media, there is a belief that the comment was a legal maneuver rather than a reflection of genuine political conviction, and argues that NBC’s reporting is selectively presented to push a particular narrative. Throughout, the speaker contrasts this with a broader media portrayal, arguing that while Brian Cole Jr. did make the comment about the 2020 election being stolen, the context is missing, and the media narrative is being shaped by selective reporting. The speaker frames the situation as an instance of media cherry-picking intended to influence perceptions about the suspect’s political affiliations and the nature of his statements to the FBI, rather than providing a complete account.

A recent meeting with Capitol Police revealed that the person who found the pipe bomb on January 6th was an undercover Capitol Police officer. This raises concerns about the response time of other law enforcement agencies. The timing of the bomb's discovery, just minutes before the breach of the Capitol perimeter, seems suspicious. The ATF director refused to comment on whether the bombs were operable, suggesting a cover-up. The bombs were sent to Quantico for inspection, not to the ATF. The discovery of the bombs also prevented reinforcements in the form of bike racks from reaching the Capitol, potentially making it easier to breach. The motive behind planting the bombs remains unknown.

The Justice Department released a report revealing the FBI had 26 confidential human sources in DC on January 6th, with four entering the Capitol and 13 entering the restricted area. Questions arose regarding the discrepancy between this information and previous testimonies given under oath by FBI Director Ray. Concerns were raised about whether these sources instigated events, similar to the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot. The media is accused of downplaying the report's significance, while Republicans claim the events were an inside job. The report's implications for January 6th defendants are discussed, particularly regarding potential pardons and whether confidential human sources are exempt from prosecution. Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley questioned why the confidential human sources who entered the capital were not charged. Trump may pardon January 6th defendants. Tulsi Ganford may become the next DNI.

Speaker 0 claims to have video footage from January 6th of two federal agents attacking the Capitol. Speaker 0 states they have been trying to get the FBI to investigate for over a year, providing them with twenty-nine minutes of high-definition footage. Speaker 0 says the FBI has not arrested the agents, nor have their images appeared online. Speaker 0 claims the FBI refuses to accept a statement or view video from January 5th, 6th, and 7th. Speaker 1 says the FBI raided them twice, came to their home, and took their phones. Speaker 1 advises Speaker 0 to avoid the FBI if possible.

The speaker discusses the FBI's ongoing investigation into the January 6th Capitol riot and the arrest of Trump supporters. They highlight the FBI's inability to find information about the person or people who planted pipe bombs outside the RNC and DNC headquarters the night before the riot. The speaker then introduces new surveillance footage released by Capitol Police, showing the moment one of the bombs was discovered. They describe the video, pointing out the lack of concern from law enforcement and the Secret Service, as well as the proximity of the bomb to VP-elect Kamala Harris. The speaker raises questions about the identity of the person who alerted authorities to the bomb and the subsequent cover-up.

Vice President Kamala Harris was allegedly targeted by a pipe bomb at the Democratic National Committee headquarters on January 6, 2021. The FBI is urging people to report any suspicious activity, offering a $500,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of the suspect. However, the person in charge of the FBI investigation now claims that Harris was never in danger and the bomb couldn't have detonated while she was there. The incident is not mentioned in a special January 6th report. Questions arise about why Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell denied National Guard assistance prior to the Capitol riot. A newly released video shows Capitol Police and Secret Service officers seemingly relaxed near the bomb. The FBI released video footage of the suspect, but the cell phone data was corrupted, leaving unanswered questions.

The speaker questions witnesses about the presence and activities of federal agents or assets during the January 6th Capitol riot. One witness states they do not know if any federal agents or assets were present on January 5th or 6th, whether they agitated the crowd, or whether any entered the Capitol. The speaker suggests this may be perjury, noting the witness has had two years to find out. The speaker also asks about confidential human sources and the erection of gallows, claiming FBI Director Wray and Attorney General Garland have stonewalled inquiries. Another witness confirms their report will include information about confidential human sources operating on Capitol grounds on January 6th, but cannot provide a number. The report is in draft form and requires classification review, making its release before the upcoming election unlikely. The report will address whether confidential human sources followed DOJ protocols and include information about travel reimbursements. The speaker expresses frustration with the delay and lack of transparency.

Concerns about federal agents' presence on January 6 were raised, but there were no definitive answers regarding their involvement. One individual stated they had no personal knowledge of any agents present or their actions. Questions about confidential human sources from the FBI at the Capitol remain unanswered, with an upcoming report expected to provide some clarity. However, the report is still in draft form and undergoing classification review, making it uncertain if it will be released before the upcoming election. There is a suggestion that if any agents were present and broke the law, they should have followed established protocols, but details about reimbursements and specific actions remain unclear. Frustration was expressed over the lack of transparency and timely information from the FBI and DOJ.