TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines. By 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker suggests vaccines could be a key culprit in the rise of diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which the speaker claims were rare in their childhood. The speaker believes this generation is damaged by these diseases.

Vaccines don't cause autism. The science is clear. Vaccines don't cause autism. Vaccines do not cause autism. I do not deny that we need to do more about autism, but it has nothing to do with vaccines. We have thoroughly debunked any association between autism and these vaccines. Robert, it is nearly consensus in the scientific community that there's no link there. To deny a mountain of scientific evidence, which has already taught us that the combination of measles, mumps, rubella, or MMR vaccine doesn't cause autism, Vimerosal, an ethylmercury containing preservative that wasn't a number of vaccines doesn't cause autism, and that too many vaccines given too soon, if you will, doesn't also cause autism. We know that the schedule is safe. Are there peer reviewed scientific reports that indicate a link between No. Between vaccines and autism? No. Not only is there not a peer reviewed work, this is probably the most studied public health issue involving children. Vaccines are really the one thing we have looked at as causing autism. The Institutes of Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control have repeatedly investigated this. Vaccines do not cause autism. We don't need more research. At some point, enough is enough. It's fine to continue to collect data, but at some point, you have to take note for an answer. We're not sure what causes autism, but we know that vaccines do not. Mountains of evidence. No, you know, this has been looked at extensively. Nothing's been more studied in the world than this connection between vaccines and autism. We'd heard it. We've heard it for decades. You know, actually almost a century now, if you want to get into it. This has been the battle cry of the pharmaceutical industry and every shill that works for them. But whether you know it or not all the way back in 2020 for those of you that were watching then we actually disproved this myth right then. Debunked it with a lawsuit where we went at the CDC and said really if the head of your page on the CDC website says vaccines plural meaning all vaccines do not cause us to do we have that original website. This is what it said: vaccines do not cause autism. There it is. All vaccines doesn't say one of them or two of them all vaccines by the plural s at the end of vaccines. If vaccines do not cause autism will you please provide us with all of the evidence and studies that show that vaccines don't cause autism. Send us that evidence. Well they didn't and we sued them and we went to court. Back in 2020, we won the case. Here it looks like in the document. They gave us the list. It's actually 20 studies. 20 total studies make up the entire list of what they look to when they say that these childhood vaccines, the five, and the cumulative effects of them given in the first six months of life, do not cause autism. The first one is an MMR study. The second one an MMR and a DTaP study. The next ones are MMR, these four are MMR and Thimerosal studies. Then the next all the way through to 20 are all just Thimerosal studies. Lastly, we have one antigen study. Of the 20 studies, the first MMR studies are not in the first six months of life; Thimerosal studies show none of the vaccines in the first six months of life had Thimerosal. There was only one study relevant to the first six months of life, the IOM review of the DTaP vaccine, and it said there are no studies that prove or disprove the association with autism. Therefore, that was the only one that was relevant to the first six months of life, and it proved that they had no answers. And so for everyone that's ever sent Mountain of Evidence, that's been a lie. We won in court. It's a lie. You can take that to the bank. And actually just months after winning that lawsuit, that was in May, by August they pulled down the statement vaccines do not cause autism. We celebrated it but five months later it went back up and we've been stuck there with this propaganda statement that have no basis in science up until last night when this happened to the website. Let's see the new page. Here it is. It now says autism and vaccines and right under that it has the key points. So we read those key points. The claim vaccines do not cause autism is not an evidence-based claim because studies have not ruled out the possibility that infant vaccines cause autism, meaning those vaccines in the first six months of life. Meaning the IOM lawsuit that proved that. Studies supporting a link have been ignored by health authorities. HHS has launched a comprehensive assessment of the causes of autism, including investigations on plausible biologic mechanisms and potential causal links. It does have an explanatory statement I want to read right now. It says this about why you will still see it with an asterisk the header vaccines do not cause autism has not been completely removed due to an agreement with the chair of the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee that it would remain on the CDC website. Apparently, this was that backroom deal that was made with Senator Cassidy, of course, when Robert Kennedy Jr. was up there. But now you can see on the page it is clear we are making the statement or it's being made by the CDC that this is not a scientific statement and so ultimately this is a massive change. I tweeted out about it today and to every parent of an autistic child that's been out there. For every one of you that did interviews, whether in the film Vaxxed or when we toured the nation and for everyone that's ever been gaslit, the days of gaslighting are over. We are now moving into science-based, evidence-based statements on the CDC website. It's a beautiful day.

Speaker cites a rapid rise in autism: "one in ten thousand children had autism" in the distant past, then "one in twenty thousand," then "one in ten thousand," and now "one in thirty one" overall, with boys at "one in twelve" in some areas, notably California. "Since February, autism rates have surged by much more than four hundred percent." He questions why and argues researchers should be appreciated rather than attacked for seeking answers. On stage were doctors, and he said, "this is what we gotta we have to find out." He adds, "Because when you go from 20,000 to 10,000 and then you go to 12, you know there's something artificial. They're taking something."

About 25% of kids with autism are nonverbal, not toilet trained, and exhibit stereotypical behaviors, and this population is growing. While many individuals with autism are doing well, the speaker focuses on this specific group with severe disabilities. The media promotes the idea that increased autism rates are due to better recognition or changing diagnostic criteria, but studies disprove this. In 2013, the California legislature asked the Mind Institute at UC Davis to investigate whether the rise in autism is real or due to increased awareness. The Mind Institute concluded it is a real epidemic. The speaker argues that this epidemic is unique to children, as full-blown autism (nonverbal, non-toilet trained) is rarely seen in older adults. While the speaker has encountered people with Asperger's or on the spectrum who are their age, they have never seen an older individual with full-blown autism, despite its prevalence in children, affecting one in twenty boys, and in California, one in 12.5 boys.

"autism is such a tremendous, horror show what's happening in our country and some other countries, but mostly our country." "We will have announcements as promised in September." "We're finding interventions certain interventions now that are clearly almost certainly causing autism." "In 1970, the biggest epidemiological study in history was done in Wisconsin." "They looked at 900,000 children and they were looking for autism." "incident rate of point seven." "Today, our most recent numbers are one in every thirty one kids." "California, which has the best collection system, is reporting one out of every nineteen children American children as autism, one in every twelve point five boys." "So it's gone from one less than one in ten thousand in 1970 to one in twelve point five boys." "We will."

In 1987, 330 out of every million children were diagnosed with autism. Today, that number is 27,777 per million. To deny an autism epidemic, one must believe that researchers in North Dakota missed 98.8% of autistic children, including thousands with profound disabilities who were somehow invisible to doctors, teachers, parents, and their own study. The same researchers followed the original group for 12 years and, upon double-checking, found they had missed only one child. Doctors and therapists in the past were not missing all these cases, therefore the epidemic is real.

The speaker states that autism is a preventable disease caused by environmental exposure, not genes, though genes can provide vulnerability. A study by Blacksell et al. estimates the cost of treating autism in the US will be a trillion dollars a year by 2035, adding to already astronomical healthcare costs. According to Irva Herzbachoda, research into genetic causes of autism receives 10 to 20 times more funding than research into environmental factors, which is where the answer lies. Autism destroys families and children, many of whom were fully functional before regressing around age two due to environmental exposure. These children may never hold a job, pay taxes, or live independently. The speaker believes "we are doing this to our children" and it needs to end.

- an estimated a hundred and fifteen thousand children develop autism every year in The United States. - And if doctor Sally Ozanoff's work is correct, and she's at UC Davis, she shows that eighty eight percent of autism cases are characterized by regression. - Now regression suggests an acute toxic exposure, not genetics, not better awareness, an acute toxic exposure, which means that most cases of autism are preventable. - Autism is not a medical or scientific mystery. - We know beyond a reasonable doubt that toxicants, mostly from vaccines and about a dozen additional toxicants, are causing autism. - If we repeal the 1980 Bayh Dole Act, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and the 2005 PREP Act, that would remove the structural incentives that created the autism epidemic and the chronic disease epidemics in this country.

Vaccines cause autism, according to the speaker. They claim that a graph showing the percentage of vaccinated children versus the age of their first vaccination indicates a link between the MMR vaccine and autism. The speaker also suggests that there is a significant increase in autism incidence among children who receive the vaccine between 12 and 18 months compared to those who receive it after three years. They argue that the CDC refuses to conduct a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study because the results would reveal a high risk. The speaker questions the credibility of a study used to dismiss the vaccine-autism connection and calls for changes in vaccination policies.

“More than forty percent of American children now have at least one chronic health condition” and “Just a few decades ago, one in ten thousand children had autism. Today, it's one in thirty one.” It asks why the rise isn’t genetic: “There is no way in the world that these kind of rapid increases in the incidence of disease could be genetic,” and notes “over fifty four percent of our kids have a chronic disease.” It states “not a single childhood vaccine is safe” and that there has been “not a double blind randomized placebo controlled trial prior to licensure.” It discusses Henry Ford Health System data: “18,468 subjects, 1,957 of them were fully unvaccinated” showing “two point five fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination” and “Fifty seven percent of the vaccinated had a chronic health condition in just ten years” versus “seventeen percent of the unvaccinated.” It ends with “The Galileo moment” and “That choice is yours.”

- The meteoric rise in autism is among the most alarming public health developments in history. There's never been anything like this. - And now it's one in thirty one, but in some areas, it's much worse than that, if you can believe it. One in thirty one. - For boys, it's one in twelve. - And by the way, I think I can say that there are certain groups of people that don't take vaccines and don't take any pills that have no autism, that have no autism. - They're pumping it looks like they're pumping into a horse. - You have a little child, little fragile child, and he get a a vat of 80 different vaccines, I guess. - 80 different blends, and they pump it in.

As a child, the speaker received three vaccines; by 1986, children received 11 doses of five vaccines. Now, children in states with mandates may receive 69 to 92 vaccines between conception and age 18, with varying dose requirements depending on the brand. Each vaccine is designed to permanently alter the immune system. The speaker believes this contributes to an epidemic of immune dysregulation. The speaker claims there is a rise in diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADD, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette's syndrome, narcolepsy, and autism, which they rarely saw as a child, suggesting this generation is damaged by these diseases.

Autism rates are rising, currently estimated at one in thirty-one and one in twelve, a significant increase from one in ten thousand in the speaker's childhood. A large-scale testing and research initiative involving hundreds of scientists worldwide has been launched. By September, the speaker claims they will know the cause of the autism epidemic and be able to eliminate the exposures responsible.

We are vaccinating infants against risks that don't exist. There has to be a quantifiable risk that we're trying to prevent. We introduce a synthetic vaccine to their little immune system before they've even had breast milk, causing a reaction to a disease that they don't have and weren't exposed to in the first few days of life. This is why we have skyrocketing rates of autism, attention deficit disorder, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. When I graduated high school in 1988, I didn't know a single autistic child. Now, my 16-year-old daughter knows 10.

My son, born in 1991, has Asperger's, and I've heard from many parents of children with similar conditions. Since 1989, the vaccine schedule increased significantly, exposing children to much higher levels of mercury than deemed safe. For instance, newborns receive a hepatitis B shot that would require a child weighing 275 pounds to safely absorb under EPA guidelines. In 1988, 1 in 2,500 American children had autism; now it's 1 in 166, with many also facing learning and neurological disorders. Despite the alarming trends, the federal government claims there's no solid science linking vaccines to these issues. While we can't definitively prove a connection now, I believe future research will reveal a link between vaccines and autism.

In 1989, the vaccine schedule increased from 10 to 24 vaccines, all containing thimerosal with mercury. Children are injected with 400 times the amount of mercury considered safe by the FDA or EPA. A newborn receives a hepatitis B shot, but under EPA guidelines, would have to be 275 pounds to safely absorb it. In 1988, autism affected 1 in 2,500 children; now it affects 1 in 166. Additionally, 1 in 6 children have learning, neurological, speech, or language disorders, ADD, or hyperactivity, all connected to autism. The federal government claims there's no good science linking vaccines to autism, but science is often diluted in politics. While it can't be proven now, intuitively, the speaker believes that thimerosal causes autism.

As a long-term autism researcher and director of the New Jersey Autism Study, the speaker discusses the dramatic increase in autism prevalence. When the study began with the CDC, it was expected that autism prevalence would remain stable, unlike other neurological disorders. However, autism rates have increased significantly, from a rare disability affecting 1 in 10,000 to being present in every community. The speaker asserts that this increase is real and not solely due to better awareness. In New Jersey, rates have increased by 300% in 20 years, a trend confirmed by CDC reports and other data sources. The speaker believes future reports will show even higher rates, suggesting an urgent public health crisis. The speaker urges a focus on understanding the environmental or risk factors triggering autism, claiming that despite data collection, there has been a lack of real progress in understanding the causes, prevention, or effective treatment of autism. The speaker encourages a careful review of the CDC report and its supplemental tables to recognize autism as a true phenomenon requiring investigation into its root causes.

There is nothing more profitable than a sick child because insurance companies, hospitals, the medical cartel, and pharmaceutical companies profit from them. The earlier a child is sick, the more profitable they are. When the speaker's uncle was president, 6% of Americans had chronic disease; today, it's 60%. The annual cost of treating chronic disease was zero then, but now it's about $4.3 trillion, and none of it is necessary. In 1960, the autism rate was between one in 1,500 and one in 10,000. Today, according to the CDC, it's one in every 34 kids, and in some states, like California, Utah, and New Jersey, it's one in 22. These children should be healthy and high-performing, but instead, they have an extraordinary disability. Full-blown autism can result in nonverbal, non-toilet-trained children who will never graduate high school or live independently.

Autism rates have skyrocketed, with 1 in 10,070 men over 70 affected compared to 1 in 34 kids today. The speaker questions why allergies and autism were rare in their generation but prevalent now, costing the country $1 trillion annually. They emphasize the need to address this issue that is impacting so many children.

The ADDM report indicates an alarming increase in autism prevalence. The ASD prevalence rate in eight-year-olds is now 1 in 31, with a higher risk for boys, 1 in 20 overall, and 1 in 12.5 in California. Since the first report in 1990, autism has increased by a factor of 4.8. About 25% of diagnosed children are nonverbal and have severe symptoms. The speaker disputes the idea that increased prevalence is solely due to better diagnoses. Referencing table three of the ADDM report, they claim the rates are genuinely increasing year by year. They cite a Wisconsin study of 900,000 children that found autism in less than 1 in 10,000, compared to today's 1 in 31. A 1987 North Dakota study found a rate of 3.3 per 10,000. A national collaborative perinatal project between 1959 and 1965 found 4.7 cases per 10,000. A UC Davis MIND Institute study concluded that the autism epidemic is real.

If the autism epidemic is due to better diagnostics, it should be seen in older people, but it is not. Where are the 71-year-olds with full-blown autism? They are not seen in malls, homes, or institutions. The speaker claims this absence indicates a falsehood, likely perpetuated by industries profiting from an environmental toxin in air, water, medicines, or food. These industries benefit from normalizing autism and claiming it has always existed. The speaker asserts it is not good for the country or the press to not be skeptical. New studies will soon be announced to identify the specific environmental toxins causing autism, which the speaker claims has not been done before. The speaker anticipates providing answers to the American people quickly.

In 2016, the autism rate was 1 in 54, and in 2000, it was 1 in 150. One speaker asks what the rate was in the past and what is causing the change. Another speaker cites a peer-reviewed study in Wisconsin that looked at 900,000 children and found the rate to be 0.7 out of 10,000, which is less than 1 in 10,000.

The speaker claims the media propagates a false narrative that increased autism rates are due to better recognition or changing diagnostic criteria. They cite studies and a 2013 California legislature request to the UC Davis Mind Institute, which allegedly concluded that a real autism epidemic exists. The speaker argues that the epidemic is specific to children, not older generations. They state that while they've encountered people their age with Asperger's or autism spectrum traits, they've never seen older individuals with "full blown autism" (nonverbal, non-toilet trained), implying such cases are absent in older populations.

Speaker 0 suggests the increase in autism diagnoses is due to over-diagnosis, with children now receiving multiple diagnoses for what was once considered normal behavior, and that autism diagnoses are currently fashionable. Speaker 1 refutes this, calling it nonsense and an industry-driven myth. They claim numerous studies in reputable journals confirm a real autism epidemic. If it were simply better diagnosis, older people would also be diagnosed, but the epidemic is specific to those born after 1989. Speaker 1, age 71, states they have never seen someone their age with profound autism, characterized by nonverbal communication, lack of toilet training, head banging, and stimming. The speaker questions why, if it weren't an epidemic, it would only affect a single generation.

The speaker claims there's a simple solution to an unspecified problem: stop vaccinating. They allege that vaccine information sheets are propaganda and that the risk of serious adverse events is about one in twenty, not one in a million. The speaker states that the cause of autism is known, contrary to common belief. They claim there are hundreds of studies showing how toxins can cause autism and that aluminum, in particular, creates massive brain inflammation. The speaker suggests that if people stop vaccinating, eat organic food, and avoid Tylenol, they will be almost guaranteed healthy children.