reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker criticizes Leticia James, calling her unqualified, corrupt, and racist for targeting Trump. They believe James should be disbarred for her actions and accuses her of trying to bankrupt Trump out of hatred. The speaker defends their criticism by stating it is not about race but about corruption. They argue that James violated legal principles and should be held accountable. The speaker praises Trump for his financial success despite James' efforts. They emphasize the need to fight back against such actions and express concern for the future of the country.

The speaker expresses concern about the high levels of violence in New York City and accuses the attorney general and judge of fraudulently manipulating assets. They claim that the case against them is a fraud and that justice has been weaponized against them. Despite a higher court overturning the judge's decision, they believe the judge will continue the case. They refer to this as election interference and mention their lead in Iowa. President Donald Trump concludes the statement.

The judge overseeing the case against Donald Trump has significant conflicts of interest. His daughter, Lauren Merchant, is president of a political advocacy group that has raised substantial funds for campaigns opposing Trump, while his wife, Laura Merchant, worked for New York Attorney General Letitia James during the time she was building a case against Trump. This raises serious concerns about the judge's impartiality. Despite Trump's lawyers requesting his recusal due to these connections, the judge refused, claiming he is not biased. Additionally, he has imposed a gag order on Trump, which many view as unconstitutional.

At a Leticia James campaign event, Alison Greenfield, principal law clerk for Judge Arthur Engeron, is seen taking pictures while candidates criticize President Trump. Greenfield's voice can be heard expressing support for Biden as the greatest president ever. She was also observed campaigning with Congressman Jerry Nadler and supporting Alvin Bragg's policies. Videos show Greenfield at a political rally for Letitia James, actively involved in petitioning and campaigning. The judge issued a gag order on Trump and his attorneys, leading to speculation that Greenfield is passing instructions from James, Nadler, and Schumer to Judge Engeron. This raises concerns about her influence on the trial's outcome.

At a Leticia James campaign event, Alison Greenfield, principal law clerk for Judge Arthur Engeron, is seen taking pictures and expressing criticism towards President Trump. Greenfield is also observed actively campaigning with Congressman Jerry Nadler, who led the impeachment of Trump, and engaging in campaign activities for Alvin Bragg. Videos show her presence at a political rally supporting Letitia James, where she is involved in petitioning and campaigning. The question arises whether Greenfield is passing instructions from James, Nadler, and Schumer to Judge Engeron, who issued a gag order on Trump and his attorneys. A recent ruling expanded the gag order, preventing Trump's attorneys from making public statements about communications with the judge and his staff. Greenfield's actions suggest she is influencing the trial's outcome in favor of James, Nadler, and Schumer.

The attorney criticizes the judge for bias and questions why taxpayer money is being used in the courtroom. They argue that everyone has the right to a defense and a lawyer who can protect their interests. The attorney expresses frustration with the judge's behavior and emphasizes the importance of preserving American democracy. They accuse the opposing party of taunting and attacking their client without evidence. The attorney asserts that their client, former President Trump, has a successful company and expertise in real estate. They believe the opposing party's politics will ultimately fail.

This is a corrupt case involving a $355 million fine in New York. The speaker criticizes the judge, Leticia James, and Biden, claiming it's a political witch hunt. They defend their company's integrity, tax payments, and employment impact. The speaker vows to appeal, accusing the judge of undervaluing assets and using the case for political interference. They assert they're targeted due to their presidential campaign success. The speaker concludes by promising to make America great again.

According to the speaker, they believe there is no case against Trump, as stated in the New York Law Journal. They express frustration at being stuck in their current location and would rather be in other states. They accuse the attorney general of corruption and claim that the judge is biased because they are a Democrat. The speaker believes the entire system is corrupt and wants to highlight this corruption to the press. They thank the New York lawyer for their work and state that the attorney general is trying to create a case against them.

The speaker expresses unwavering support for President Trump but criticizes the courtroom proceedings in New York. They claim that the judge limited their ability to present a defense and highlight the lack of evidence against their client. The speaker also accuses the opposing side of unethical behavior, including paying a witness. They argue that this is a violation of the justice system and emphasizes their commitment to fighting for everyone's right to speak and defend themselves. The speaker denies any fear on the part of the former president and states that he will continue to fight for Americans.

The speaker expresses unwavering support for President Trump but criticizes the court proceedings and the justice system. They claim that the defense was not allowed to present evidence or call expert witnesses. They also mention a witness who was allegedly paid by the opposing party. The speaker vows to appeal the verdict and fight for everyone's right to free speech and a fair defense. They assert that these trials are politically motivated and take place in New York to ensure biased juries. The speaker concludes by stating that President Trump will continue to fight for Americans without fear of the consequences.

The attorney criticizes the judge for bias and questions why taxpayer money is being used in the courtroom. They argue that everyone has the right to a defense and a lawyer who can protect their interests. The attorney expresses frustration with the judge's behavior and emphasizes the importance of preserving American democracy. They accuse the opposing party of taunting and attacking their client without evidence. The attorney asserts that their client, former President Trump, has a successful company and expertise in real estate. They conclude by warning about the dangers of a flawed judicial system and the need to fix the country.

At a Leticia James campaign event, Alison Greenfield, principal law clerk for Judge Arthur Engeron, is seen taking pictures while candidates criticize President Trump. Greenfield's voice can be heard expressing support for Biden as the greatest president ever. Videos show Greenfield actively campaigning with Congressman Jerry Nadler and supporting Alvin Bragg's policies. She is also seen petitioning and campaigning for Letitia James. The question arises whether Greenfield is passing instructions from James, Nadler, and Schumer to Judge Engeron, who issued a gag order on Trump and his attorneys. An expanded gag order has been issued, preventing Trump's attorneys from making public statements about communications with the judge and his staff. Greenfield's actions suggest she is influencing the trial in favor of James, Nadler, and Schumer.

The attorney criticizes the judge for bias and questions why taxpayer dollars are being used in the courtroom. They argue that everyone has the right to a defense and a lawyer who can protect their interests. The attorney expresses frustration with the judge's behavior and emphasizes the importance of preserving American democracy and the judicial system. They criticize the prosecutor for taunting their client and accuse her of having political motivations. The attorney asserts that their client, former President Trump, has a successful company and extensive real estate expertise. They believe the prosecutor's politics will ultimately fail.

There are concerns about Judge Mershon presiding over Trump-related cases due to his political donations and behavior in court. He was not randomly selected from the pool of judges and has shown bias. Despite praise for his judicial temperament, he has made questionable decisions, such as yelling at witnesses and allowing inappropriate behavior in the courtroom. The situation is confusing and raises suspicions of bias and unfairness.

The speaker argues that there is no victim in the case against President Trump for alleged financial fraud. They claim that the attorney general, Letitia James, is leading a politically motivated campaign. The speaker criticizes the judge for undervaluing Trump's properties. They believe the case lacks merit due to Trump paying his bills and having no intent to commit fraud. The speaker questions the judge's decision to side with the banks over Trump's valuation of Mar a Lago.

The judge presiding over the case has family ties to individuals involved in anti-Trump campaigns and investigations, raising concerns about bias. Despite requests for recusal, the judge refused, claiming he is impartial. A gag order on Trump was issued, deemed unconstitutional by critics.

Congresswoman Elise Stefanik wrote a letter to the Judicial Conduct Commission about Judge Engeron's behavior during the trial of Donald Trump. She accuses the judge of displaying bias against Trump and making prejudiced statements. Stefanik highlights that the judge entered summary judgment against Trump before the trial began and refused to listen to his defense. She also points out that the judge is a partisan Democrat who donated to the Manhattan Democrats, which violates the judicial code. Stefanik argues that if the judge can mistreat a billionaire businessman and former president, he poses a risk to all Americans. She expresses frustration that society and the media are allowing this to happen, indicating a decline in standards and a lack of accountability.

The speaker expresses frustration with a judge who they believe has already decided their client is guilty of fraud. They argue that everyone has the right to a fair defense and that corruption in courtrooms needs to be addressed. They criticize the opposing attorney, accusing her of taunting and having political motivations. The speaker asserts that their client, former President Trump, has built a successful company and is worth more than claimed. They emphasize the importance of paying attention to the erosion of the judicial system and urge for change in the country. The speaker concludes by stating that the opposing attorney made a mistake in attacking someone with extensive real estate experience.

The judge in Trump's trial is biased and unfair, threatening Trump with arrest if he doesn't attend court daily. The judge has connections to Biden and is targeting Trump supporters as potential jurors. The goal is to convict Trump before the 2024 election to prevent him from running again. Democrats are using the legal system to destroy Trump out of fear of losing to him in future elections.

A left-wing New York judge is preventing the 45th president of the United States from speaking in court. The president's attorney, Alina Haba, explains that the judge interrupts him when he tries to explain the complexities of real estate. The judge's actions are seen as biased and unfair, hindering the president's ability to defend himself. Haba believes there should be consequences for violating judicial ethics and calls for a mistrial. The situation is damaging the reputation of the New York legal system and is seen as a clown show. The president's knowledge of real estate could have provided valuable insights if the judge had allowed him to speak.

The speaker criticizes the political lawfare in the Alvin Bragg trial, accusing it of being a sham to target Trump. They highlight the lack of prosecution by various agencies and question the motives behind the case. The speaker also questions the jury selection process, alleging bias against Trump supporters. They argue that this lawfare is aimed at interfering in elections and boosting Biden's campaign, vowing that Trump will win in 2024 to stop this misuse of the justice system.

The judge in this case has close ties to individuals who have worked against Donald Trump, including his daughter who is involved in a political advocacy group that campaigns against Trump. The judge's wife also worked for the New York Attorney General during the time when a case was being built against Trump. Despite requests for recusal, the judge refused, claiming he is not biased. A gag order against Trump was issued by the judge, which is seen as unconstitutional.

The speaker discusses a left-wing judge in New York who is not allowing the 45th president of the United States to speak in court. The speaker believes that the judge has an agenda and is biased against Donald Trump. They argue that Trump is knowledgeable about real estate and is trying to explain the science and economics of it in court. The judge is accused of cutting him off and not allowing him to finish his paragraphs. The speaker criticizes the judge's behavior and calls for someone to speak out against it. They also mention a law clerk with left-wing affiliations and express the need for an impartial judicial system. The speaker believes there should be a mistrial and accountability for violating judicial ethics. They conclude by stating that the New York legal system looks like a clown show and that Trump has had a significant impact on real estate in New York.

The speaker discusses the upcoming trial against Trump in DC, stating that it is their greatest chance of conviction. They criticize the judge and prosecutor, calling them a liberal activist and a communist, respectively. The speaker also mentions the short timeline between indictment and trial, noting that it is unusual for a case of this magnitude. They criticize the judge for not allowing enough time for preparation and express concern about the lack of discovery. The speaker believes that the left sees and supports this abuse of power.

The speaker expresses concern about election interference and accuses Biden and his associates of running a campaign to damage him. They criticize the corruption and bias in the legal system, specifically mentioning Mark Pomerantz and Colangelo. The speaker believes that the ongoing trials are unfair and politically motivated. They mention the raid on Mar-a-Lago and claim it is illegal. The speaker also discusses their financial situation, stating they have a lot of cash and a successful company. They express frustration with the judge and attorney general in New York and suggest that businesses may leave the state. The speaker concludes by saying they would be willing to testify in the trial if it proceeds.