TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that the flu vaccine's purpose has shifted from preventing the flu to only lessening symptoms. A Cleveland Clinic study allegedly found the flu vaccine had a negative efficacy of 26.9% last winter. According to the speaker, this means that individuals who received the flu vaccine were 26.9% more likely to contract influenza. The speaker notes the study doesn't detail the pharmaceutical industry's profits from the vaccine or list its side effects. They state the side effects would be less than an mRNA vaccine, as it is a dead virus vaccine. The speaker reiterates that taking the flu shot allegedly makes one almost 27% more likely to get sick than not taking it.

The flu season is upon us. Forty six million of us obediently took the shot. By far, the greatest number of the claims, two thirds of them, are for neurological damage or even death allegedly triggered by the flu shot. Judy Roberts, healthy in 1976, "Two weeks later, she began to feel a numbness starting up her legs" and was "totally paralyzed"; the diagnosis: "Guillain Barre syndrome, GBS for short." There are "300 claims now pending from the families of GBS victims who died, allegedly as a result of the swine flu shot." They are "asking $12,000,000, though they don't expect to get nearly that much." The vaccine was called X53A; "Was X53A ever field tested? I can't say." "No. I had never heard of any reactions other than a sore arm, fever, this sort of thing." "Did you know ahead of time... Absolutely." "The consensus of the scientific community was that the evidence relating neurologic disorders to influenza immunization such that they did not feel that this association was a real one." "The swine flu vaccine has been taken by many important persons, ..." "Mary, did you take a swine flu shot? No." "4,000 others like her are still waiting for their day in court."

I did not really know what an adjuvant was. At the moment I discovered that we were using a trick to hyperactivate the immune system in order to make the vaccine work, my thought was, how could that possibly be safe? Right. And what does it have to do with all of the allergies that we scratch our heads over? Right. Right? It doesn't make sense that I'm the immune system, you know, the the body of toxins, you know, into inflammation. I mean, in a world where inflammation is the bad guy, this product's designed to cause inflammation in order to work. In a totally nonspecific way. Here are the things that you should avoid eating for the next two weeks or a month.

Dr. Jeff Barkey discusses an email from a local hospital about a physician vaccine clinic to update on the COVID and flu shots, and reviews the flu vaccine insert for Fluzone 2526 calendar year. Warnings and precautions (section 5): - Guillain–Barré syndrome - Allergic reactions - Immunocompetence problems - Limited vaccine effectiveness Post-marketing experience (section 6.2): - Thrombocytopenia (low platelet count) - Lymphadenopathy (swollen lymph nodes) - Anaphylaxis (severe allergic reaction) - Guillain–Barré syndrome - Bell’s palsy Ingredients (section 11, description): - Multidose vial contains thimerosal, a mercury-derived preservative - Each shot contains twelve point five micrograms of mercury - Also contains formaldehyde - Contains oxyphenol ethoxylate (used in industrial cleaners, detergents, and agricultural chemicals; acts as an endocrine disruptor) Not evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility (section 13.1): - Fluzone has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility translation Informed consent Friday conclusion: - The speaker emphasizes these points to highlight information presented in the vaccine insert.

Speaker 0 states his position on vaccines has changed because he learned how they are produced. He had assumed they were produced reasonably, but discovered safety work had not been done. He says that in a book he completed in 2019, he listed vaccination as one of medicine's three great achievements, along with surgery and antibiotics. He now believes the mechanisms used by vaccine manufacturers and the methods used to obscure safety signals invalidate the products. Discovering that vaccines use a trick to hyper-activate the immune system to work, he questioned its safety and its connection to allergies. Speaker 0 says injecting aluminum to hyper-activate the immune system should come with instructions about what to avoid eating or seasons to avoid the shot, to minimize the likelihood of triggering the immune system to react to something that is not a pathogen. Speaker 1 summarizes this by saying the vaccine opens up the body so that anything present at the time can trigger an immune response.

I would never take the flu shot. Research from Cochran and BMJ shows that while the flu shot protects against that specific strain, it increases the likelihood of getting a non-flu infection by 4.4 times. Many people who receive the flu shot end up feeling sick, often experiencing symptoms similar to the flu. This reaction is due to a phenomenon called pathogenic priming.

I would not take the flu shot in a million years. Cochrane and BMJ found that people who take the flu shot are protected against the flu, but are 4.4 times more likely to get a non-flu infection. Many people get sick after the flu shot, and that's usually because they are getting something indistinguishable from the flu because the flu shot gives you something called pathogenic priming. The Pentagon published a study by Wolfe in January of this year, that said that the flu shot primes you for coronavirus. The people who got the flu shot were 36% more likely to get coronavirus, and there were six other major studies that say the same thing.

I've shut down the CDC's flu shot ad campaign and postponed a major vaccine conference to prioritize transparency over pharmaceutical profits. This is part of my plan to dismantle vaccine corruption. The CDC's "mild to wild" flu shot campaign has been canceled, a vaccine advisory conference postponed, and NIH employees fired. This isn't random; it's a deliberate move to expose corruption between big pharma and regulatory agencies. Reports show many severe flu cases occur in vaccinated individuals, with studies suggesting repeated flu shots weaken immunity. Flu vaccine efficacy rates are often low. We've been misled about vaccine immunity versus natural immunity, vitamin D's benefits, and the dangers of mRNA vaccines. If they lied about the flu vaccine and natural alternatives, what else is untrue? It's time to demand independent research and explore natural ways to support our immune systems. This is just the beginning of uncovering the truth about vaccines.

The biggest message lost during the pandemic is the importance of vitamin D. There's no such thing as flu and cold season, only low vitamin D season. Every cell in your body has a receptor for vitamin D, which controls thousands of genes and is the master key to your immune system. We're facing an international vitamin D deficiency pandemic, with 70% of the world immune suppressed. In the US, 70-80% of Americans are deficient, especially nursing home patients and people of color. Hospitalized and ICU patients are also highly deficient. If you're deficient, you're immune suppressed and susceptible to illnesses. The best mask is a healthy immune system, which requires adequate vitamin D. Sunshine is key, but those above the 35th parallel can't synthesize it through their skin for much of the year.

"People who take the flu shot are protected against the at strain of flu." "They're four point four times more likely to get a non flu infection." "and you might find, and a lot of people do, that they get the flu shot and then they get sick." "They're usually not getting the flu, they're getting something that is indistinguishable from the flu because the flu shot gives you something called pathogenic priming." "The flu shot not only primes you for flu, and it primes you for coronavirus." "What they found is actually the people who got the flu shot were thirty six percent more likely to get coronavirus and that's not a that's not a lone study." "We found six other major studies that say the same thing." "If you get the flu shot, you're more likely to get coronavirus."

I would never take the flu shot due to findings from Cochrane and BMJ. Those vaccinated are 4.4 times more likely to get non-flu infections and often experience illnesses similar to the flu. The flu shot can cause pathogenic priming, weakening the immune system and increasing susceptibility to other viral infections, including coronavirus. A Pentagon study indicated that flu shot recipients were 36% more likely to contract coronavirus. Observational data suggests that life expectancy in the elderly has declined since flu shot mandates, and many COVID-19 fatalities were among those who received flu shots. While I oppose mandates, I believe individuals should have the choice to take the flu shot if they wish, similar to other medications.

"Post marketing observational studies, increased risk of GBS, Guillain Barre syndrome, was observed during the forty two days following the Shingrix vaccine." "This is not correlation. This is causation." "This is grown in Chinese hamster ovary cells, and they tell us that there is residual amount of host cell proteins in the vaccine itself." "It also contains polysorbate eighty in addition to an adjunct an adjuvant that's called a s zero one b." "The problem with this product is that it can overstimulate the immune system. It can cause severe local and systemic reactions." "Shingrix has not been evaluated for its carcinogenic or mutagenic potential. Translation, we don't know if this product could lead to cancer." "If you're older than 80, you would have to treat three hundred and fifty six patients with the Shingrix vaccine to prevent one case of postherpetic neuralgia."

They said stroke only happened to the old, but hospitals started seeing something new. Healthy people suddenly clotting. Coincidence? Maybe. But after 2021, studies began tracing small patterns, inflammation, platelets, micro clots weeks after certain shots. Most never notice but for a few, the immune system hits too hard. The same spike that's meant to protect starts sticking to vessel walls. Breath thickens, flow slows, boom. Ischemia. Doctors call vaccine induced immune thrombotic events. Rare, yes, imagined, no. Its indolentacid and negem. The question isn't if it happens but why somebody's break the code. Genetics, guts, toxins, maybe all three. Because when the system builds to defend starts to misfire the result isn't protection, it's a stroke.

Speaker 0 argues against the flu shot, citing Cochrane and BMJ. He says: people who take the flu shot are protected against the at strain of flu, but they’re four point four times more likely to get a non flu infection. He contends that after vaccination you might get sick, not from flu but from something indistinguishable from flu, because the flu shot gives you pathogenic priming that injures your immune system and makes you more likely to get a non flu viral upper respiratory infection. He references a Pentagon story, citing Wolfe (January), stating the flu shot not only primes for flu but primes for coronavirus. In the study, they had a placebo group and a vaccine group to test prophylaxis against coronavirus for military readiness, and they found people who got the flu shot were thirty six percent more likely to get coronavirus. He claims this is not an isolated finding, saying six other major studies report the same thing. Regarding longevity, he references Cochrane’s point about what has happened to longevity in the elderly since flu shot mandates began for elderly people, saying life expectancy has dramatically gone down as the flu shot proliferation increased. He adds an observational note about the COVID vaccine period: “during the COVID crisis” there’s no science on this, but observationally, it tended to be people who got their flu shots—nursing home residents who receive flu shots and first responders who get flu shots are implicated. Speaker 1 interruptions: asks for clarification, saying, “with all due respect, I don’t understand the implications of your position. If you’re right, why wouldn’t it follow that the flu shot should be illegal? You said it’s criminal.” Speaker 0 responds with a partial cut-off fragment, beginning to reply with “to” and then stopping.

Taking the vaccine increases the risk of blood clots, but N Acetylcysteine (NAC) can prevent them and boost antioxidant levels. Zinc ionophores protect against single-stranded RNA viruses, including all strains of COVID-19. The flu shot is not very effective, with only a 38% success rate, and alternative options like quercetin and EGCG (a green tea extract) are more powerful. Zinc nanoparticles and vitamin D3 are crucial for immune response, while vitamin C supports the immune system. These over-the-counter options are affordable and accessible to everyone.

The spike and pseudouridine in the shots are changing receptor patterns on cells, suppressing the immune system's ability to fight off viruses like herpes, HPV, and RSV. Toll-like receptors, which train cells to fight cancer, are also being suppressed. These receptors are like the marines of our immune system, constantly circulating and identifying friend or foe. However, the shots are causing these marines, along with dendritic cells and macrophages, to become inactive, leaving the body defenseless against cancer cells and pathogens. It is unclear when this suppression stops or how to reverse it. While not affecting everyone, the degree to which it is happening is concerning.

People dismiss this guy because of his voice, it's hard to listen to sometimes. The condition he has, you would think there'd be some way to address it. He believes that the condition came from a side effect of the flu vaccine, which he used to take every year. So he believes it's a vaccine injury, which is very ironic. Those things don't work either. Even if it protects you from that one flu, it makes you many times more likely to catch other things. We're messing around with complex systems inside human bodies with pharmaceutical drugs. The way they've studied them is filled with shenanigans.

I'm in constant management of vaccine injury Yeah. I get flare ups, and I have a regimen. I have a go to, and like, thank God they're still working, and we should talk about God next. But I’ll keep it concise: regimen includes sauna, cold, red light, morning sunlight, direct sunlight as much as possible, some, you know, vascular movement, lymphatic drainage in sunlight. I do lymphatic gua sha. I do the spike detox, Tollpike detox. I also take vitamin d three and magnesium, elderberry syrup, and occasionally zinc. I have a calamansi tree; calamansi is a tiny citrus between kumquat, orange, and a tangerine. Vitamin C from this fruit is incredible, though it’s very sour, so I add raw honey. On good days I feel glowing and surfing for three to four hours, but the flare up is always there. The spike protein be in the thousands; a paper measured antibody levels after COVID or three shots; production of spike continues for years. Five years, inflammatory; hugely inflammatory.

Fluzone package insert: Indicated for six months of age and older. Adverse reactions for kids, normal crying, malaise, drowsiness, appetite loss, vomiting, fever, and headache. Section 5.1 under warnings and precautions. evidence for a causal relationship, not correlation, but causation of Guillain Barre syndrome. Guillain Barre is described as a type of partial paralysis that looks a lot like polio with influenza vaccine. The decision to give Fluzone quadrivalent should be based on careful consideration of potential benefits and risk. Fluzone has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or for impairment of fertility. There are no placebo controlled randomized trials for this product. They base efficacy simply on the ability of the product to elicit antibody response that's measured in the blood. Translation. We don't know if this product causes cancer or can interfere with reproductive health, but let's give it to a six month old. Informed consent.

In a million years, I wouldn't take the flu shot. Research from Cochrane and BMJ shows that flu shot recipients are 4.4 times more likely to contract non-flu infections. Many people who get the flu shot often feel sick afterward, usually from something similar to the flu, due to a phenomenon called pathogenic priming, which weakens the immune system. A Pentagon study revealed that flu shot recipients were 36% more likely to contract coronavirus compared to a placebo group. This finding is supported by six other major studies indicating that receiving the flu shot increases the likelihood of getting coronavirus.

Welcome to this talk. Now let me give you the bottom line on this video so you can decide if you want to watch. A large study at the Cleveland Clinic found out that the flu vaccine, the influenza vaccine over last winter, wasn't that effective. In fact, it had a negative efficacy of twenty six point nine percent. In other words, if you took this flu vaccine, you were twenty six point nine percent more likely more likely to get influenza. Now unfortunately the paper doesn't give us details on how much money the pharmaceutical industry made from selling this vaccine with negative efficacy.

Speaker 0 discusses this year's flu shot and mentions that flu season is longer than usual. He references headlines about flu vaccine links to higher infections, citing a Cleveland Clinic study involving their employees and the influenza vaccine during this respiratory viral season. In the study, 53,402 employees were observed; 43,857 (82.1%) had received the influenza vaccine by study end. Influenza occurred in 1,079 individuals (2.02%). The cumulative incidence of influenza was similar for vaccinated and unvaccinated groups early on, but over time the cumulative incidence increased more rapidly among the vaccinated. The study includes an adjusted analysis controlling for age, sex, clinical nursing job, employment location, and reports that the risk of influenza was significantly higher for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated, yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of -26.9%. In other words, the data suggested a 26.9% greater chance of contracting the flu or other respiratory virus for the vaccinated group. The conclusion presented is that influenza vaccination of working-age adults was associated with a higher risk of influenza during the 2024-2025 season, suggesting the vaccine did not have the intended protective effect. Speaker 1 adds commentary, noting that the Cleveland Clinic study admits they effectively coerced over 80% of their staff to get the flu shot, implying these individuals are not biased against the vaccine and would be expected to defend it. They argue this makes the bias the opposite of what some might assume and suggest that the study should prompt reconsideration of vaccination. Speaker 1 then pivots to an appeal: they encourage viewers to sign up for their email list at thehighwire.com or ICANN, promising to deliver the study and related evidence in their inbox. They urge viewers to take the Cleveland Clinic document to their doctor and ask, “Should I get this year's flu shot?” If the doctor says yes, Speaker 1 counsels firing the doctor and presenting the document as a reason, claiming doctors may be unaware of the study. They emphasize firing doctors who do not know the study and assert that this week they wish to see doctors fired across the country if they cannot defend the use of the vaccine in light of the study. Speaker 1 concludes with a personal admonition to avoid doctors who, in their view, are not making informed decisions about health and the future of children. Speaker 0 revisits the broader context, noting that a flu vaccine with low effectiveness is not surprising since strains are guessed before the season and production is ramped up accordingly. He references Canadian headlines about low or no protection this year, and remarks that negative efficacy, such as -26.9%, is particularly noteworthy.

The first vaccine decreases white blood cell production by 50%. The second dose, given eight weeks later, decreases saline while increasing harmful ingredients, further attacking white blood cell production by another 25%, leaving only 25% functionality. The booster contains 81 strands of foreign bacteria that the body can't fight effectively due to the reduced white blood cell production, leading to chronic inflammation in areas of predisposition, such as gut health, respiratory issues, or pre-existing conditions. This puts the body in a constant state of fight or flight with low immunity. The second booster contains eight strands of HIV, which shuts off the ability to make white blood cells, mirroring the effects of the disease itself. People are left with no immune system, foreign bacteria, HIV strains, and other harmful ingredients.