reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The FBI told NBC News that a civilian found a hijacker's passport some distance from Ground Zero. An agent reported finding the passport blocks away from the attack. The agent's superior dismissed the idea that the passport was planted. He then ordered an invasion of the entire Middle East. The indestructible passport is now missing. The speaker wonders who took it and if they reverse-engineered it. He speculates that buildings made of passport paper might have survived. He wants to prevent the passport from being misused.

Israeli spies were detained after being caught recording the 9/11 attacks. They later admitted on television that it was their job to document the event. They were then questioned again, this time about their alleged membership in Masai. They explained that they come from a country that faces daily terror attacks and their purpose was to document the event.

The speaker warns that a war with Arabs and the Muslim world is imminent, but claims that the 9/11 attacks were not carried out by Muslims, but rather by the Israeli Mossad. They refer to a US army report published the day before 9/11, which allegedly warned about Israel's ability to carry out such attacks. The speaker emphasizes that this is not their conspiracy theory, but information from the US army report.

The transcript weaves together a compilation of statements and reporting surrounding the 9/11 attacks, Israeli involvement rumors, and related investigations. - Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly said September has been good for Israel, claiming, “we're benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon and the American struggle in Iraq.” - CNN reported (and later acknowledged as false) a tape in which Osama bin Laden told his mother that something big was about to happen; bin Laden had consistently denied involvement in 9/11 and claimed Zionists were behind the attacks. Reports from Japanese, Chinese, and Indian outlets claimed bin Laden was killed in Afghanistan in 2001 and buried in an unmarked grave by his own men. There are claims from the Muslim world and some European figures that Zionist extremists staged the 9/11 attacks to ignite terrorism. - A commentator asserted that the war has targeted Israel’s Muslim enemies and is being fought and paid for with American blood, lives, and tax dollars. - A speaker argued that bin Laden, regardless of who committed the attacks, comes back to the Middle East, and urged the United States to dismantle the entire “evil empire of terrorism,” warning that without doing so, the terror network could develop nuclear capabilities and threaten the United States and its allies. - Observers described a lack of apparent shock among certain people in connection with the events, noting unusual behavior or reactions. - Five men arrested in a van were later identified as Israeli, with some connections to Israeli intelligence; they were turned over to the FBI. National security databases showed some of the men had prior Israeli intelligence or counterterrorism experience, and one admitted serving in an Israeli army anti-terrorist unit and refused a lie detector test for an extended period. A speaker emphasized loyalty to country when discussing military service. - Fox News and others reported that up to 140 Israelis had been detained prior to September 11 in an ongoing, broad investigation into suspected espionage by Israelis in the United States. Government documents described hundreds of incidents across U.S. cities that investigators said could indicate organized intelligence gathering. The “country A” in a General Accounting Office document was said to be Israel, described as conducting aggressive espionage against the U.S. despite being an ally, with Israel possessing substantial resources to achieve its collection objectives. - Investigators questioned the possibility that some Israeli agents had advanced knowledge of the attacks, suggesting there is explosive but not necessarily conclusive evidence when aggregated. A recurring theme was the question of how such agents could have known, given the events. - Allegations of foreknowledge included claims that Israeli agents were forewarned and filmed the event on Israeli television. Some individuals detained or questioned described their presence in Israel as journalists or documenters. The broader question centered on whether Israelis gathered intelligence in advance and whether it was shared or withheld. - The transcript also recounts the failure to account for certain details (e.g., passport survivals, disappearance of voice recorders) as well as assertions that anthrax letters, later linked to a U.S. Army lab, were used to deflect blame toward Muslims. - Two accounts describe a white Chevy van linked to Urban Moving Systems, a moving company whose employees were alleged to have connections to Israeli intelligence. The FBI issued a nationwide alert about the van, and two suspects were reported in custody after explosives were found in a vehicle near the George Washington Bridge. CBS reported that two suspects were in FBI custody and that the truck contained enough explosives to damage the bridge, with some accounts noting a prior alert about a van on the way to destroy the bridge. - Overall, the material presents a network of claims and investigations involving alleged Israeli espionage, foreknowledge of 9/11, intelligence operations in the United States, and specific incidents surrounding the George Washington Bridge and related arrests.

A narrative of alleged Israeli false flag operations is laid out, beginning with 1949 when Meyer Max Bennett, described as a Zionist Jew of German descent, was sent to Iraq by Mossad. There he connected with Mossad agent Youssef Basri and planned a series of attacks on Iraqi Jews, providing maps, instructions, and specific orders to terrorize the Jewish population. From 1950 to 1951 a wave of bombings struck the Jewish community in Iraq, targeting cafes, mechanic shops, and synagogues with grenades and TNT. These attacks coincided with underground Zionist groups urging Iraqi Jews to leave for Israel, resulting in the exodus of about 130,000 Iraqi Jews within two years and aiding Israel’s early demographic needs. The account states these Iraqi attacks are part of a long list of Israel’s false flag operations. Basri was arrested by Iraqi police and executed for involvement. Bennett escaped and later helped organize an even larger false flag operation in Egypt, known as Operation Susanna, beginning in 1952 after Bennett returned under the pretense of a German businessman producing equipment for the disabled. The operation planned Jews to plant bombs inside Egyptian, American, and British civilian targets to blame the Muslim Brotherhood and Egyptian Communists, with the aim of influencing the British to retain troops along the Suez Canal. Bombings occurred in Alexandria and Cairo, but the scheme failed when one agent betrayed the plot and Egyptian authorities arrested undercover Jewish operatives, including Bennett. Bennett committed suicide when facing execution. The operation became known as the Lavon affair. Israel denied involvement at the time, but exposure followed later in 2005 when the Israeli president awarded surviving Lavon-affair agents certificates, and again in 2023 when British-Israeli historian Abi Shlaim spoke to a Jewish agent involved in Baghdad, who provided evidence of Israeli culpability. The text asserts numerous reports of false flag operations across decades serving Israel’s interests, including alleged involvement or influence in terrorist acts, and uses these cases to justify speculative claims about more recent or modern attacks being Israeli false flags. It references a connection to nine-eleven, and notes an incident on 10/10/2001 when two Israelis with Pakistani passports, grenades, explosives, and guns were stopped in the Mexican parliament while intending to blame Muslims; Mexican authorities purportedly faced pressure from Israel to suppress reporting. The narrative continues with a 2025 explosion destroying three buses in Bat Yam and Occupied Palestine, with Israeli authorities claiming Palestinian terrorists while asserting it was actually two Jewish Israelis; a media blackout followed. It mentions thousands of bomb threats during Trump’s presidency purportedly made by a Jewish American Israeli, initially used as evidence of rising antisemitism but later alleged to be perpetrated by the same group. It cites a Jewish American Israeli teen accused of making 2,000 threats and attempting to extort a Republican senator, with some calls directed to Australian Jewish centers. In Australia, cases are described as false flag attempts: a Zionist wearing a Star of David cap in a Muslim-owned cafe as part of a staged sting by The Daily Telegraph; two crackheads recruited to spray “kill the Jews” on a car and perform arson against synagogues and restaurants, later revealed to involve dark web recruitment and cryptocurrency payments. Australia is said to have been pressured to blame Iran, though no evidence is provided. The text also references Bondi Beach attacks and online speculation of false flags, arguing that Zionists’ long history of orchestration undermines public trust. A closing note echoes a maxim about deception, followed by a call for viewers to engage critically in the comments and to consider becoming a channel member to support continued production.

How could Mohammed Ada's passport survive the plane crash that supposedly cremated him, only to be found in readable condition within 48 hours? Why did these men even need passports for domestic flights? And if they were so easy to identify, why weren't these 19 accused Muslims under surveillance? Then, three weeks after 9/11, the anthrax letters killed five people and were worded to blame Muslims, but it was proven that the anthrax came from a US army lab and was never mailed by Muslims. Also, there are no airport security videos of any of the 19 accused Muslims boarding any of the hijacked planes.

Mohammed Ada's passport miraculously survived the plane explosion and was found intact within 48 hours. The presence of passports on domestic flights raises questions, as they would not be needed after the suicide flights. Additionally, the hijackers were not under surveillance despite being easily identifiable. Suspicion grows with the discovery of planted evidence, including anthrax letters that falsely blamed Muslims. It was later revealed that the anthrax originated from a US army lab, not from Muslims. Furthermore, there are no airport security videos showing the accused Muslims boarding the hijacked planes.

there was an incident where there was a white van in New Jersey across from the World Trade Center, and five Israelis, probably Mossad, were giving the high five after the World Trade Center was hit. The investigation was taken away at the Justice Department from terrorism and put in national security completely sealed off. You know, if you could look at it benignly, it was the Israelis who stumbled across this. the parameters of people knew about this of nine eleven in advance are there, and they need to be investigated. Is it possible that these Mossad assets were in place in New Jersey in order to film the first hit? And there's actually a lot of, reports that they were there set up before the first plane hit. They They were set up before the first plane hit. So you can confirm that. That's true. Yeah. Yeah. They were set up there before.

The hijacker's accent matches an Israeli Hebrew accent, according to the voice recorder from the hijacked plane. It has been confirmed by FBI director Mueller, BBC News, and ABC that 7 out of the 19 Muslims whose mugshots were shown worldwide did not die in the 9/11 crashes. They are alive and victims of identity theft. One of the accused Muslims died a year before the hijackings. It raises questions about who stole their identities and why the FBI isn't searching for them. If the hijackers were truly Muslims, why would they implicate fellow Muslims by stealing their identities? Wouldn't it make more sense for them to blame Israelis by stealing Israeli identities? Similarly, if the hijackers were Israelis, wouldn't they be more likely to steal Muslim identities and put the blame on Muslims?

The voice of the hijacker heard from the hijacked planes voice recorder reveals that the accent of the hijacker matches an Israeli Hebrew accent. FBI director Mueller, BBC News, and ABC have confirmed that seven of the 19 Muslims whose mugshots were flashed around the world did not die in the nine one one crashes. They are alive and well and are victims of identity theft. An eighth accused Muslim died one year before the nine one one hijackings even occurred. Who stole their identities and why isn't the FBI looking for them? If the hijackers really were Muslims, why would they steal the identities of fellow Muslims and implicate them? Wouldn't they be more likely to steal Israeli identities and put the blame on Israelis? If the hijackers were Israelis, wouldn't they be likely to steal the identities of Muslims and put the blame on Muslims?

The hijacker's voice on the plane's recorder had an Israeli Hebrew accent. Reports show that 7 of the 19 accused Muslims in the 9/11 attacks are alive, with one dying before the attacks. Questions arise about why their identities were stolen and not Israeli ones. The speaker questions whether the hijackers were actually Israelis trying to frame Muslims.

The transcript states that the voice of the hijacker on the hijacked planes’ voice recorder reveals that the accent of the hijacker matches an Israeli Hebrew accent. It then reports that FBI director Mueller, BBC News, and ABC have confirmed that seven of the 19 Muslims whose mugshots were flashed around the world did not die in the September 11 crashes; they are alive and well and are victims of identity theft. It adds that an eighth accused Muslim died one year before the September 11 hijackings even occurred. The speaker then asks who stole their identities and why the FBI isn’t looking for them. It questions if the hijackers really were Muslims, why they would steal the identities of fellow Muslims and implicate them, and suggests they would be more likely to steal Israeli identities and put the blame on Israelis. It further asks whether, if the hijackers were Israelis, they would be likely to steal the identities of Muslims and put the blame on Muslims.

The voice of a hijacker from the plane's voice recorder has an accent that sounds like Israeli Hebrew. A transmission seconds later warns, "Nobody move. Everything will do to you. They're trying to make any move." FBI director Mueller, BBC News, and ABC confirmed that seven of the nineteen Muslims, who were named as the hijackers, are actually still alive. They are victims of identity theft. Another accused Muslim died a year before the 9/11 attacks. Who stole their identities, and why isn't the FBI investigating? If the hijackers were Muslim, why steal Muslim identities? Wouldn't they steal Israeli identities to blame Israelis? If the hijackers were Israeli, wouldn't they steal Muslim identities to blame Muslims?

Americans are being warned that they may be drawn into a war with Arabs, falsely believing that Muslims were responsible for a terrible event. However, the speaker claims that it was actually the Israeli Mossad, known for their cunning and ruthlessness, who orchestrated the attack and made it appear as though Arabs were to blame. This is referred to as a false flag operation. The speaker cites a US army report from the day before 9/11 as evidence of Israel's capabilities.

Americans, be aware. There is a potential war with Arabs and the Muslim world looming. However, it is important to note that the blame for any terrible event should not be solely placed on Muslims. The Israeli Mossad, known for their cunning and ruthlessness, could potentially carry out attacks on Americans, making it appear as if Arabs were responsible. This is referred to as a false flag, and it is not just a conspiracy theory. In fact, a US army report, released the day before 9/11, warned about Israel's capabilities. Feel free to criticize me, but these are the facts presented by the US army.

How did Mohammed Atta's passport survive the explosion that supposedly cremated him, emerging intact from the debris within 48 hours? Why did the 19 hijackers need passports for domestic flights, and why were they found while the plane's voice recorders were not? If they were easily identifiable, why weren't they under surveillance on 9/11? The narrative continued with anthrax letters sent weeks later, killing five and seemingly blaming Muslims, but it was later proven that the anthrax originated from a US army lab. Additionally, there are no airport security videos showing any of the 19 hijackers boarding the planes.

I saw 3 men on a van near the towers, acting strangely. They were later found to be Israelis working for a moving company. Some suspected them of being part of an intelligence operation. Despite initial suspicions, they were cleared of involvement in 9/11 and deported. A Jewish speaker believes Judaism challenges false beliefs and boundaries, upsetting some.

How could Mohammed Ada's passport survive the plane crash that supposedly cremated him, fly out of the plane, and end up readable in the hands of investigators? Why did the alleged hijackers even need passports on domestic flights, and why were passports found but not the plane's voice recorders? If the 19 accused Muslims were easy to identify, why were they not under surveillance? Adding to the suspicious evidence, the anthrax letters, clearly worded to blame Muslims, killed five people. These letters said, "Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great." But the anthrax was proven to have come from a US army lab and was never mailed by Muslims. Also, there are no airport security videos of any of the 19 accused Muslims boarding any of the hijacked planes.

Americans are being misled into a war with the Muslim world, blaming them for attacks actually carried out by the Israeli Mossad. This was warned in a US army report the day before 9/11, revealing Israel's capabilities. It's a false flag operation, not a conspiracy theory. Wake up to the truth.

The speaker discusses a theory that a horrible event was falsely attributed to Muslims, when in fact it was carried out by a cunning and ruthless Israeli individual. They claim that this theory is not their own, but rather based on a US army report published the day before 9/11. The report allegedly warned about Israel's capabilities. The speaker invites criticism but emphasizes that this information comes from an official source.

The voice of the hijacker heard on the hijacked planes’ voice recorder is described as having an accent that matches an Israeli Hebrew accent. Seconds after that audio-related claim is mentioned, further transmissions are referenced in the narrative. FBI director Mueller, BBC News, and ABC are said to have confirmed that seven of the 19 Muslims whose mugshots were flashed around the world did not die in the nine one one crashes. The account states that these seven individuals are alive and well and are victims of identity theft. The transcript then raises attention to an eighth accused Muslim, stating that this person died one year before the nine one one hijackings even occurred. The transcript uses these points to introduce a series of questions about identity theft and investigative priorities. It asks who stole the identities of the mentioned individuals and why the FBI is not looking for the person or people responsible for the identity theft. It also focuses on the relationship between the alleged hijackers and the people whose identities were allegedly used. If the hijackers really were Muslims, the transcript asks why they would steal the identities of fellow Muslims and thereby implicate other Muslims. It questions whether, in that scenario, the hijackers would be more likely to steal Israeli identities and put the blame on Israelis rather than taking identities from Muslims. In the alternative scenario presented, the transcript asks whether the hijackers were Israelis, and if so, whether they would be more likely to steal the identities of Muslims and put the blame on Muslims. The transcript’s argument structure is centered on comparing these possible identity-theft targets—Israeli identities versus Muslim identities—against the stated identities attributed to the hijackers. Overall, the transcript links together three main elements: (1) the hijacker voice recorder claim about an Israeli Hebrew accent, (2) the confirmation that seven of the 19 Muslims shown in mugshots are alive and victims of identity theft, and (3) the additional claim that an eighth accused Muslim died one year before the hijackings. It then culminates in questions about the identity theft perpetrator, the lack of FBI pursuit as framed by the transcript, and the implications of who would target which identities depending on whether the hijackers were assumed to be Muslims or Israelis.

The transcript presents a sequence of claims about Israeli individuals in relation to the September 11 attacks, drawn from different sources and presented without evaluation. It links eyewitness claims, alleged spying concerns, attitudes toward the attacks, documentary evidence, and a provocative arrest scene, attributing each element to specific sources. - "On the morning of 09:11, a group of five Israeli nationals purported to have witnessed the initial explosion of the World Trade Center and were seen to be celebrating the event." This statement asserts immediate eyewitness activity at the World Trade Center collapse and describes celebratory behavior by the group. - "Fox News has learned some US investigators believe that there are Israelis again very much engaged in spying in and on The US, who may have known things they didn't tell us before September 11." This claim presents the assertion of renewed Israeli espionage involvement in the United States and suggests foreknowledge not disclosed before the attacks. - "It is true that some in Israel saw the attack as a good thing for them." This line conveys an evaluative stance attributed to segments within Israel regarding the attacks. - "A 09/12/2001 article in the New York Times quotes now Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu responding to the nine eleven attacks. Quote, it is very good, before adding, well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy." This portion provides a cited reaction from Israeli leadership, including the quoted phrase about the attack being “very good” and the caveat about generating immediate sympathy. - "According to FBI documents, the Israelis caught celebrating the nine eleven attacks had videotaped the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and may have possessed foreknowledge of the same." This claim attributes specific documentary evidence to the celebrants, alleging videotaping of the attack and possible foreknowledge. - "When the Israelis were arrested in New Jersey, they were carrying photos of themselves smiling with the World Trade Center burning in the background." This final detail describes the physical evidence found with the arrested individuals, illustrating the asserted celebratory conduct. The sources cited in the transcript include Fox News, The New York Times, and FBI documents, each contributing a separate facet: eyewitness celebration, alleged espionage implications, public sentiment within Israel, leadership reaction, documentary evidence, and incriminating photographs carried at arrest.

The speaker warns Americans that they are being manipulated into believing that a terrible event was caused by Muslims, when in reality it was orchestrated by the Israeli Mossad. This is known as a false flag operation. The speaker references a US army report from the day before 9/11, which highlights Israel's capabilities.

Americans, beware of being drawn into a war with Arabs by the Israeli Mossad, who can stage attacks to blame Muslims. This is known as a false flag, as detailed in a US army report released the day before 9/11. The report warned about Israel's tactics.

Mohammed Ada's passport miraculously survived the plane explosion and was found intact within 48 hours. The presence of passports on domestic flights raises questions, as they would not be needed after the suicide flights. Additionally, the hijackers were not under surveillance despite being easily identifiable. The planting of evidence continued with anthrax letters, falsely blaming Muslims. It was later proven that the anthrax came from a US army lab, not from Muslims. Furthermore, there are no airport security videos showing the accused Muslims boarding the hijacked planes.